In the early stages: project of the SSN (X) multipurpose nuclear submarine for the US Navy

19

Multipurpose nuclear submarine USS Seawolf (SSN-21) of the project of the same name. Despite their technical excellence, these ships did not become widespread.

The US Navy is going to create a new project of a multipurpose nuclear submarine and begin mass production of such ships. So far, this project bears the symbol SSN (X) and is in its earliest stages. The first submarines of the new type will enter service in the first half of the thirties, which will make it possible to begin replacing the aging Los Angeles-class ships.

In the early stages


The need to create a new multipurpose nuclear submarine to replace the old Los Angeles ships and to complement the modern Virginia has been discussed over the past several years. The fact is that over the next 10-15 years, the US Navy will have to write off the aging Los Angeles, and new submarines will appear in the armament of foreign countries. This leads to the need to develop a promising underwater "hunter".



However, real measures in this direction have been taken only recently. The FY2021 defense budget for the first time, expenses were envisaged for the development of the project of the future submarine SSN (X). However, this year only $ 1 million has been allocated for all events. The draft budget for the next FY2022 includes 98 million dollars are already being requested for development. As work continues, a new increase in spending can be expected due to objective factors.

Construction of the lead nuclear submarine SSN (X) is expected to begin only by the end of the twenties, and the ship will enter service by the middle of the next decade. According to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office, such a submarine could cost from 5,8 to 6,2 billion dollars, while the required number of submarines and their total cost have not yet been determined.


Submarine USS Providence (SSN-719), transferred the fleet in 1985. At the moment it is the oldest ship of the Los Angeles type in service

The exact price of the new submarine can be calculated only after the Navy determines the requirements for it, and the development organizations form its appearance. Work of this kind has already begun, but its results are still missing. At the same time, some wishes for a new nuclear submarine are already mentioned in the documents and statements of officials.

According to customer requirements


The first requirements for SSN (X) were disclosed in the draft defense budget for the current fiscal year. The document indicated that the goal of the project is to create a new multipurpose nuclear submarine capable of detecting and hitting a wide range of targets. Such ships will have to ensure the maintenance of their presence in all major regions of the oceans.

The new SSN (X) should differ from the previous Virginia project with increased driving characteristics and stealth parameters. It is proposed to increase the total ammunition load, as well as to revise the composition of the armament. Unlike its predecessors, future SSN (X) should have more potential in finding and destroying underwater and surface targets.

The main armament should be torpedo tubes with the ability to use cruise missiles. Separately, the issue of using vertical launchers or abandoning them should be considered. At the same time, it was required to provide additional equipment, such as unmanned underwater vehicles.


The last "Los Angeles" - USS Cheyenne (SSN-773) in 2003 after returning from Iraq

A few days ago, the Sea Air Space 2021 conference was held in the United States, during which Rear Admiral Bill Houston, the head of the Undersea Warfare Division, revealed the new wishes of the Navy for the new nuclear submarine. In general, the fleet wants to get a submarine with high performance, which will become the "supreme predator" of the depths. It is planned to obtain such a result in different ways.

According to B. Houston, in the promising project SSN (X) it is necessary to combine the best qualities of submarines of existing projects. It is necessary to ensure the performance and payload at the level of the Seawolf-class ships, as well as ensure stealth and use onboard instruments no worse than that of the Virginia. At the same time, operational characteristics, incl. service life, should be at the level of future strategic missile carriers Columbia.

Technical uncertainty


Thus, the Navy is inclined to abandon previously used concepts and is considering the possibility of building nuclear submarines with new qualities. In the previous Virginia project, emphasis was placed on the ability to combat coastal targets, while maintaining anti-submarine and anti-ship capabilities. In the SSN (X) project, they can revise the goals and objectives of the submarine, making it mainly a hunter for sea targets.

The exact shape, tactical and technical characteristics, etc. have not yet been determined and will be formed only in the future, based on the results of current research activities. It can be expected that the size and displacement of the SSN (X) nuclear submarine will be close to the existing Virginia ships. At the same time, the rejection of separate installations for missiles can lead to a decrease in the submarine in comparison with the previous type.


Solemn ceremony of handover of the USS Virginia submarine (SSN-774), 2004

Particular attention is paid to issues of reliability and durability. In this context, the possibility of using the developments of the new Columbia SSBN project is being considered. This means that SSN (X) can receive the most modern systems and units with a high resource. In addition, it is possible to use a nuclear power plant that does not require fuel replacement during its entire service life.

Planning issues


At a recent event, Vice Admiral B. Houston noted that the design team currently working on the Columbia submarine could be involved in the development of the SSN (X) project. They have already mastered modern technologies and can create ships with a backlog of decades. However, they will not be transferred to SSN (X) until they complete the Columbia work.

The plant, which is to build a new type of nuclear submarine, has not been determined. At the same time, only two enterprises have the necessary competencies, which are already loaded with orders for the construction and modernization of ships of current types.

Approximate plans for serial production are drawn up. In the early stages of the building program, the Navy will be able to receive one SSN (X) annually. After 2035, in connection with the completion of other programs, the release of production capacity is expected. This will increase the pace of work on SSN (X) and annually hand over two submarines. In addition, there is a fundamental possibility of further increasing production.

According to current estimates, the promising SSN (X) nuclear submarines will replace the aging Los Angeles. The oldest ships of this type, remaining in the Navy, have been in service since 1985. The newest this year celebrates 25 years of service. By 2035, all or almost all of Los Angeles will be decommissioned due to resource depletion. In addition, the oldest multipurpose Virginia will fit the service life limits.


The newest Virginia class submarine is the USS Montana (SSN-794). She was launched in February 2021

The required number of SSN (X) submarines has not yet been announced and may not yet be determined. However, it should be expected that several dozen of these ships will be built in the middle of the century. Due to this, in the distant future, it will be possible to maintain the number of submarine forces at the required level, despite the abandonment of old ships.

The fleet of multipurpose nuclear submarines, made up of ships Virginia and SSN (X), will be able to solve all relying combat missions. Each of the submarines will be able to search for and hit various targets. At the same time, the older "Virginias" will be more effective against coastal targets, and the new SSN (X) will take over the hunt for enemy ships and submarines. The competent organization of the combat service of such a submarine fleet will allow obtaining maximum results.

Underwater confrontation


Thus, after lengthy preliminary discussions, the US Navy is still launching a program to develop a promising multipurpose nuclear submarine. The necessary funding has been found and preliminary work has begun. However, the project, as always, will be lengthy - the first ships of the SSN (X) type will enter service in the middle of the next decade. After that, for several decades, they will shape the US submarine fleet.

One of the reasons for the creation of SSN (X) is the observed progress in the development of the leading foreign fleets - Russian and Chinese. Accordingly, "probable opponents" will closely monitor the progress of the American project and take the necessary measures. This will lead to a new change in the situation in the underwater sphere and, possibly, present different requirements for the submarines. And the US Navy will have to take these processes into account so that promising SSN (X) nuclear submarines do not become obsolete at the time of their appearance.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    28 July 2021 05: 49
    "The repair cannot be completed, it can only be completed" (c) Also with the update of the fleet

    Ships of different generations serve at one time, new projects are gradually replacing outdated ones. There is no instant 100% renewal of the ship composition

    When the last Elk is written off, modern Virginias and promising SSN (X) themselves will need to be replaced.
    1. -6
      28 July 2021 06: 08
      When they run out of money just for this endless ,, repairs ?! Again, they want to increase their debt, maybe even China will put them in a vice, Faberge, a little.
      1. 0
        28 July 2021 23: 56
        Blessed is he who can exchange
        your fist for real money.
        They can, and that's why it's such a duty.
        And the money that was borrowed works.
        They won't lend a penny to a beggar,
        because there is nothing to take from him.
        Such is the parsley.
    2. +5
      28 July 2021 07: 08
      Quote: Santa Fe
      "The repair cannot be completed, it can only be completed" (c) Also with the update of the fleet

      Ships of different generations serve at one time, new projects are gradually replacing outdated ones. There is no instant 100% renewal of the ship composition

      When the last Elk is written off, modern Virginias and promising SSN (X) themselves will need to be replaced.


      Oleg!
      I think that the American naval technicians-anvlytsy came to the conclusion that such a large submarine needs to be updated with the Tik-Tak system ...
      Generation "Tick" - a qualitative improvement in characteristics with a level of novelty up to 25%.
      Generation "Tak" - the level of novelty is up to 50%, the capabilities and characteristics are even more improved.
      This will greatly improve the combat effectiveness, there will be no 30 years of production of one boat, albeit well improved (but still based on the ideas of 40 years ago) ...
  2. +6
    28 July 2021 08: 52
    ... were not obsolete when they first appeared.

    Deprecated? That is unlikely.
    Virginia is now at the peak of progress, only Ash can compete in something, the rest do not count ...
    By 2030, Virginias will be almost four dozen, and they will serve until the 60s and 70s. SSN (X) will not replace Virginias as much as supplement them. The first - large, with a VPU, the second - with a smaller a / and, sharpened exclusively for anti-submarine warfare ...
    1. +2
      28 July 2021 11: 20
      Quote: Doccor18
      ... were not obsolete when they first appeared.

      Deprecated? That is unlikely.
      Virginia is now at the peak of progress, only Ash can compete in something, the rest do not count ...
      By 2030, Virginias will be almost four dozen, and they will serve until the 60s and 70s. SSN (X) will not replace Virginias as much as supplement them. The first - large, with a VPU, the second - with a smaller a / and, sharpened exclusively for anti-submarine warfare ...


      you must understand that the beginning of the design from 1986-87.
      The design was carried out on ideas, technologies - of the late 70s, early 80s.
      Now the year is 2021.
      how not to improve what you invented 50 years ago, there is a limit in it, because I will touch upon 50 years ago.

      no matter how they were ahead of their time, competitors, but still almost 50 years have passed since the idea was created ...
      And those people who designed and modernized these particular boats, who operated these particular boats - gained experience and received new ideas and new technologies - and, accordingly, for them Virginia is already a really outdated product.
      1. +2
        29 July 2021 10: 17
        Quote: SovAr238A
        you must understand that the beginning of the design from 1986-87.
        The design was carried out on ideas, technologies - of the late 70s, early 80s.
        Now the year is 2021.

        You are right, but in Block IV and V, it seems that little is left of that Virginia of 2004 ...
  3. +1
    28 July 2021 10: 42
    6 billion for a submarine? Not too much?
    1. +1
      28 July 2021 11: 22
      Quote: Lawyer1
      6 billion for a submarine? Not too much?


      Do you think Kazan is cheaper?

      Just don't look at the victorious reports from the talking heads of the Defense Ministry and the military-industrial complex in 2012-2015 about a preliminary contract for the construction of Kazan ...
      1. 0
        28 July 2021 16: 52
        Quote: SovAr238A
        Do you think Kazan is cheaper?
        Here is the USC price data.
        The cost of the head submarine K-329 "Severodvinsk" pr.885 is set at 47 billion rubles. The cost of a series of 5 serial SSGNs is 164 billion rubles (32,8 billion rubles per unit).

        It seems like the 885M is worth 42 billion wood. And this is at the rate of the Central Bank (on average $ 1,0 = 75,0 rubles) Then it turns out 560-570 million greens ... I have not met other prices.
        AHA.
        1. +4
          29 July 2021 08: 18
          Boa constrictor, welcome!
          The prices are correct, only the year of their voice acting is not taken into account. The dollar then cost about 30 rubles, so for a billion greens it turned out. And then there was a lot of squabble in pricing, Putin had to intervene, so it is possible that prices are understated. And it's unclear if this is a solid price or an estimate. All in all...
          1. +2
            29 July 2021 16: 49
            Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
            it is possible that prices are understated. And it's unclear if this is a solid price or an estimate.

            Andrew, hi
            It's just that when they build for themselves (GOZ), then pricing goes at cost + percentage of profitability (10-15%), and not a commercial rip-off of a client who has nowhere else to go.
            That is why now they are fighting for the creation of KAZENNYE (FSUE) enterprises and all kinds of USC / UAC, so as not to squander budget rubles ... (Because the pockets of a private trader are truly ENDLESS and are directly connected with offshore companies!)
            Now they began to squeeze the firms on the terms and guarantees of the implementation of the GOZ-a ... Let's see what happens with MikhMish and his henchman Borisov.
            AHA.
            1. +5
              29 July 2021 17: 24
              Good evening wise KAA drinks hi
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              It's just that when they build for themselves (GOZ), then pricing is at cost + percentage of profitability (10-15%),

              20 + 1 to be precise. For purchased semi-finished products, it is allowed to wind up 1%, for other costs (raw materials, salary of workers, etc.) - 20%
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              not a commercial rip-off of a client who has nowhere else to go.

              Yes, I would not say :)))) Just a commercial usually has a place to go, more competitors are not asleep.
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              That is why now they are fighting for the creation of KAZENNYE (FSUE) enterprises and all kinds of USC / UAC, so as not to squander budget rubles ... (Because the pockets of a private trader are truly ENDLESS and are directly connected with offshore companies!)

              Everything is much more complicated there. Many private traders work for the defense industry almost at a loss. The whole problem is that cost-based pricing goes only for the first time, and then - even if you break into a cake, you will not be allowed to raise the price more than the deflator coefficient. Let the costs be at least 100500 times justified. To insanity, moreover. Let's say that they used to sharpen a part by hand with a file, and spent 100 hours on it. An hour of work of a grinder, say, 200 rubles. And then they bought a CNC machine, which makes the same part in an hour, but the operator costs a little more, say, 500 rubles, that's understandable. So our valiant VP in the calculation will cut the operating time from 100 hours to 1 hour right away, but it will cost you to raise the cost of an hour. We used to work 200 rubles earlier, and now work. And to explain that he used to work as a handyman, and now a qualified specialist is useless.
              And the deflator ... well, I think there is no need to explain how inflation is considered in our country
  4. kig
    0
    28 July 2021 11: 49
    The question has long been tormented - why SSN? That is, with the last letter it is clear, N = nuclear, the second S = submarine. and the first one?
    1. +2
      28 July 2021 13: 12
      SS - Submersible Ship.
      1. kig
        0
        28 July 2021 13: 37
        won cho .. thanks, I'll know.
  5. +4
    28 July 2021 18: 09
    Something Cyril has become lazy lately and is not very deeply digging on the topic. It's a pity. The topic is new, not yet worn out. You could have distinguished yourself. AHA.
    But, as they say, to our rams ... (in the sense of the American SSN (X) wink
    So, there is a certain message from a US Navy expert about the views and wishes on the new project of the next generation PLA hunter:
    Submarine expert HI Sutton said SSN (X) could include new technologies such as:
    • Laser weapons,
    • Conformal bow sonar,
    • Quantum technology,
    • Enlarged weapon storage compartment allows you to place more systems such as weapons and UAVs,
    • More torpedo tubes to deploy the systems mentioned above,
    • Very large flanking massifs,
    • Quieter electric drive of the power plant,
    • X-rudder for better maneuverability,
    • VLS for cruise missiles and future hypersonic weapons

    It's time for words in a comment:
    1. Laser weapons. This, presumably, is a radiator placed on a retractable device (and not necessarily an OES mast) to combat aircraft and possibly small-sized NCs. The power of the device should be more than 30 kW ... but the more, the better.
    2. A developed SJC with a conformal nasal H / A antenna and developed side (flank) canvases of the HAS to cover a wide range of operating frequencies of the WB. This has been practiced since the Volkov, and in Virginias, the AN / BQG-5A onboard wide-aperture sonar antennas have received a permanent registration. The sonar complex with the AN / BQQ-10 bow GAS has also undergone changes, having ceased to be hermetically sealed with a spherical antenna.
    3. Quantum technology. There are two possible areas of use here: in the methods of locating underwater objects, communications and communication at the tactical level. and the use of quantum computing systems. Weapons include quantum gyroscopes, etc.
    4. The number of TA will increase (possibly not only airborne, but also bow ones) to 8 units. , and the number of torpedo ammunition will increase to 40-50 units. It is also planned to use the UFO in the search and destruction of underwater objects.
    5. The developers plan to still have a missile compartment for anti-ship missiles, KRBD and GZO.
    6. The Yankees are decisively switching to an electrical scheme of movement. It has already been reported that the British will equip their DREDNOUT with electric motors in the annular gap outside the PC as the main movers of their SSBNs. Judging by the fact that the cooperation of the Anglo-Saxons is growing stronger from year to year, it is logical to assume that the amas will follow their example, as was the case with water jets. The message about equipping submarines with X-shaped tail rudders belongs to the same category.
    7. New technologies will also be used to reduce the level of h / a visibility, starting from the polymer continuous GWP of the boat hull and ending with complexes for suppressing its own noise and HAP sensors built into the skin.
    And the last.
    SSN (X) is being created to combat our autonomous underwater vehicles and their carriers, and, of course, to combat submarines and NKs. This is clearly stated in the report of the US Congressional Budget Committee:
    The new SSN (X) design places a (renewed) emphasis on anti-submarine warfare (ASW), increasing the SSN (X) transit speed and stealth performance and performance over the current Virginia-class nuclear attack submarine. In addition, the SSN (X) will also carry more armament and a more varied payload than Virginia submarines. to deal with more advanced enemy submarines, unmanned submarines (UUVS) and coordinate with warships and Allied forces.
    This is - if very briefly and modestly about the ideas of our counterparts.
    Now imagine the level of science and technology of the enemy and what we will need to oppose in order to win the submarine war ...
    But.
    1. -1
      29 July 2021 01: 57
      Quote: BoA KAA
      Something Cyril has become lazy lately and is not very deeply digging on the topic. It's a pity. The topic is new, not yet worn out. You could have distinguished yourself. AHA.
      But, as they say, to our rams ... (in the sense of the American SSN (X) wink
      So, there is a certain message from a US Navy expert about the views and wishes on the new project of the next generation PLA hunter:
      Submarine expert HI Sutton said SSN (X) could include new technologies such as:
      • Laser weapons,
      • Conformal bow sonar,
      • Quantum technology,
      • Enlarged weapon storage compartment allows you to place more systems such as weapons and UAVs,
      • More torpedo tubes to deploy the systems mentioned above,
      • Very large flanking massifs,
      • Quieter electric drive of the power plant,
      • X-rudder for better maneuverability,
      • VLS for cruise missiles and future hypersonic weapons

      It's time for words in a comment:
      1. Laser weapons. This, presumably, is a radiator placed on a retractable device (and not necessarily an OES mast) to combat aircraft and possibly small-sized NCs. The power of the device should be more than 30 kW ... but the more, the better.
      2. A developed SJC with a conformal nasal H / A antenna and developed side (flank) canvases of the HAS to cover a wide range of operating frequencies of the WB. This has been practiced since the Volkov, and in Virginias, the AN / BQG-5A onboard wide-aperture sonar antennas have received a permanent registration. The sonar complex with the AN / BQQ-10 bow GAS has also undergone changes, having ceased to be hermetically sealed with a spherical antenna.
      3. Quantum technology. There are two possible areas of use here: in the methods of locating underwater objects, communications and communication at the tactical level. and the use of quantum computing systems. Weapons include quantum gyroscopes, etc.
      4. The number of TA will increase (possibly not only airborne, but also bow ones) to 8 units. , and the number of torpedo ammunition will increase to 40-50 units. It is also planned to use the UFO in the search and destruction of underwater objects.
      5. The developers plan to still have a missile compartment for anti-ship missiles, KRBD and GZO.
      6. The Yankees are decisively switching to an electrical scheme of movement. It has already been reported that the British will equip their DREDNOUT with electric motors in the annular gap outside the PC as the main movers of their SSBNs. Judging by the fact that the cooperation of the Anglo-Saxons is growing stronger from year to year, it is logical to assume that the amas will follow their example, as was the case with water jets. The message about equipping submarines with X-shaped tail rudders belongs to the same category.
      7. New technologies will also be used to reduce the level of h / a visibility, starting from the polymer continuous GWP of the boat hull and ending with complexes for suppressing its own noise and HAP sensors built into the skin.
      And the last.
      SSN (X) is being created to combat our autonomous underwater vehicles and their carriers, and, of course, to combat submarines and NKs. This is clearly stated in the report of the US Congressional Budget Committee:
      The new SSN (X) design places a (renewed) emphasis on anti-submarine warfare (ASW), increasing the SSN (X) transit speed and stealth performance and performance over the current Virginia-class nuclear attack submarine. In addition, the SSN (X) will also carry more armament and a more varied payload than Virginia submarines. to deal with more advanced enemy submarines, unmanned submarines (UUVS) and coordinate with warships and Allied forces.
      This is - if very briefly and modestly about the ideas of our counterparts.
      Now imagine the level of science and technology of the enemy and what we will need to oppose in order to win the submarine war ...
      But.

      Writing and actually doing are two different things. All that you have listed is pure "Wishlist". And how it will be, time will tell. If you want in any project, you can stuff everything that can be dug at the moment, up to railguns and Poseidons)))
    2. -2
      29 July 2021 12: 21
      Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
      6. The Yankees are decisively switching to an electrical scheme of movement. There has already been a message that the British will equip their DREDNOUT with electric motors in the annular gap outside the PC as the main movers of their SSBNs.


      Is it a "caterpillar" from "The Hunt for Red October"? :)))