A ship with giant hydrofoils. MRK project 1240 "Hurricane"

95

Small missile ship of project 1240 "Uragan" on automatically guided hydrofoils was created in the midst of the Cold War. The design of the unusual ship began in 1964. The projected ship was in many ways ahead of its time, developing speeds of up to 60 knots (111 km / h). This development of the domestic industry can be safely called the pride of the Soviet naval fleet.

True, the unique warship was built in only a single copy.



Designing "Hurricane"


In the Soviet Union, they actively worked on the creation of hydrofoil ships. Experimental work on similar projects in the country was carried out back in the 1930s. So, in 1937 and 1941, TsAGI conducted tests of boats with controlled deep-sunk wings. After the war in the late 1940s and early 1950s, similar work continued. The idea of ​​reducing the level of hydrodynamic resistance by lifting the ship's hull out of the water attracted Soviet designers of warships at the time.

A side effect of this interest was the creation in the USSR of a numerous line of civilian hydrofoils. At the same time, the Soviet Union gained world recognition in this area. Numerous "Meteors", "Rockets", "Comets" have become a recognizable hallmark of the Soviet passenger shipbuilding. The ships of these projects were in demand outside the country, including exported to Western countries. These successes would not have been without work on the creation of hydrofoil warships.

The efforts of Soviet designers and engineers were rewarded in the late 1950s, when work began to be carried out at a qualitatively new technical, design and theoretical level. Large torpedo boats pr. 206M "Shtorm" became a successful project and were built in the USSR in large series.


MRK project 1240 "Hurricane" in the dry dock in Sevastopol

At the same time in the USSR, there was a rapid development of small missile boats.

Interest in these ships around the world pushed the 1967 sea battle, when two Egyptian Soviet-made missile boats of the 183P Komar project sank the Israeli destroyer Eilat. It was the first in stories a case of sinking of a surface ship by anti-ship missiles.

Naturally, in the Soviet Union, there were ideas to combine new missile weapons with hydrofoil ships, developing a huge, even by today's standards, speed. As part of the implementation of this concept, a project was developed for a small rocket ship of project 1240, which received the code "Uragan".

The design of a new rocket ship, a distinctive feature of which was to be deeply submerged automatically guided hydrofoils, began in 1964 by specialists from TsKB-5 (today TsMKB "Almaz", St. Petersburg). The chief designer of the project was Vadim Mikhailovich Burlakov. In the process of creating hydrofoil RTOs, an experimental passenger ship "Typhoon" was developed and built.

This passenger gas turbine vessel on automatically steered wings was completed in 1969 and was actively operated in the 1970s on the lines of sea and river passenger shipping companies. The results obtained in the course of civil operation were used to improve the project of MRK project 1240 "Uragan". At the same time, the civilian Typhoon could boast of a high operating speed - 44 knots (81,5 km / h), the maximum speed reached 50 knots (92,6 km / h).


MRK "Hurricane" with raised hydrofoils and aft wing columns with propellers

The only rocket ship, built according to the project 1240 "Uragan", received the designation MRK-5 and was laid down in Leningrad in 1972. In 1976, the MRK on hydrofoils went out for testing and at the very end of 1977 - on December 30 - was introduced into the fleet in the Baltic. The entire 1978 MRK was in trial operation. After the completion of all tests, the ship from the Baltic was transferred by inland waterways to the Black Sea.

The ship arrived in Sevastopol in November 1979. In the city of glory of Russian sailors, the small missile ship was included in the 166th division of the 41st missile boat brigade of the Black Sea Fleet, where it served until 1990, when it was expelled from the fleet.

Technical features of the project 1240 small missile ship "Uragan"


At the time of construction, the new Soviet rocket ship was already amazing. Not only the novelty of the applied technical solutions, but also the size. At the time of construction, the MRK became the largest hydrofoil ship in the world. At the same time, by the standards of surface ships of the fleet, the MRK, of course, was not a giant. The ship's standard displacement was 342 tons, and the total displacement was up to 432 tons.

The greatest length of the ship - 56,6 m (without steering columns, the length decreased to 49,8 meters), width - 10,17 m.Together with the wings raised from the water, the width of the ship increased immediately to 21,14 m. wings was only 2,35 m. The crew of the ship consisted of 34 people, among whom there were 7 officers.


You can estimate the dimensions of the Hurricane's hydrofoils in contrast to passenger cars.

The MRK hull was made of a special aluminum-magnesium alloy, hydrofoils were made of titanium alloy. The size of the wings can be judged by the change in the width of the ship, taking them into account in the raised position, as well as by the numerous photographs that have come down to us. In the raised position, the wings protruded far to the sides at an angle of almost 45 degrees. The underwater wing device of the ship, which has an automatic lift control system, provided the MRK with stabilization in roll, trim and height above the water surface.

The ship was propelled by a powerful gas turbine unit, which consisted of two turbines. Through gearboxes, they transmitted rotation to the propellers mounted on the lowered wing feed columns. Each column had two propellers. The total capacity of the gas turbine power plant was 36 liters. from. This power was enough to provide the unique ship with a maximum speed of 000-57 knots.

For the movement of the ship in the displacement position, when the bow wing and both wing feed columns rose from the water, a diesel power plant (trolling unit) with a capacity of 2200 hp was used. from. The trolling unit consisted of two diesel engines powered by water jets. The maximum speed in this position reached 10 knots.

The autonomy of the ship in terms of food supplies on board was estimated at 5 days. The cruising range at a speed of 45 knots did not exceed 700 miles; at a continuous trolling speed of 8,5 knots, it increased to 1500 miles. For a hydrofoil ship, the MRK-5 had very good seaworthiness. When moving on hydrofoils, the seaworthiness of the ship was estimated at 5 points. With such a rough sea in the Baltic, the ship developed a speed of 50–55 knots during tests. In the displacement position of the hull, the seaworthiness of the ship increased to 6–7 points.

The composition of the weapons "Hurricane"


Despite its relatively small size, the Project 1240 Uragan small missile ship on hydrofoils possessed a formidable weaponry. The main strike capabilities of the ship were provided by two paired onboard launchers of the P-120 Malachite (2x2) anti-ship missiles. The missiles of this complex (according to the NATO codification SS-N-9 Siren) could hit targets at a distance of 15-150 km.

A ship with giant hydrofoils. MRK project 1240 "Hurricane"
More information about the project can be found in the magazine "Marine Collection", No. 3 for 2015

The cruise missile of the Malachite complex with a starting weight of 5400 kg carried a warhead weighing 800 kg. It was possible to install special nuclear weapons with a capacity of up to 2 megatons. The length of the rocket body was 8,84 m, the diameter was 0,8 m, the wing span of the rocket was 2,5 m. The Malachite anti-ship missile was subsonic, with a maximum flight speed of Mach 0,9.

In addition to anti-ship missiles, the MRK-5 also carried anti-aircraft missiles - one two-beam launcher of the Osa-M air defense missile system with an ammunition load of 20 missiles. Unlike the land-based versions of the complex, on the ship version, only two missiles were always ready for launch (rate of fire two rounds per minute). The complex ensured the destruction of targets at a distance of up to 15 km, the reach in height - up to 4 km.

The artillery armament of the boat was represented by a six-barreled 30-mm artillery mount AK-630, which could be used to combat enemy air targets and to combat light surface forces. The maximum effective firing range of the installation, capable of providing a rate of fire of up to 4000-5000 rounds per minute, was 4000 meters.

The fate of the ship


It is believed that the experienced MRK-5 demonstrated good seaworthiness, stood out for its excellent speed and proved to be a tenacious ship. However, its disadvantage was the overall complexity of operation. The ship, saturated with modern equipment and automation, turned out to be too complicated for the fleet, the basis of which was conscript sailors. For efficient operation, the ship required a crew of professional sailors.


MRK-5 moves on hydrofoils

Some sources indicate that the inadequate level of training of conscripts became the cause of breakdowns and accidents on board.

In any case, the prototype small missile ship of project 1240 "Uragan" was built in a single copy and, unfortunately, has not survived to this day.

In 1992, after the withdrawal from the fleet, the MRK sank after a fire in the Streletskaya Bay of Sevastopol. The ship was later raised and scrapped.
95 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -11
    23 June 2021 04: 15
    Well, no, flapping wings is in itself too much, even for an experimental ship, and then there are folding propeller columns, plus titanium, probably, like on the Tu-160.
    1. +27
      23 June 2021 04: 33
      But all the same it is impressive ... all the same, they walked ahead of the whole planet in this part, a lot was done for the first time.
      1. +11
        23 June 2021 04: 38
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        But ace is equally impressive ... all the same, they walked ahead of the whole planet in this part, a lot was done for the first time.
        You can’t argue with that.
      2. -12
        23 June 2021 07: 09
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        But still impressive ... all the same they went ahead of the whole planet

        not there .. reached, appreciated, spat, went back. And there were a lot of such projects (ekranoplanes, sea lions ..) I don’t mind the money, but you won’t return the time ..
        1. +3
          23 June 2021 10: 48
          Quote: Tlauicol
          And there were many such projects (ekranoplanes, Sea lions ..) I don’t mind the money, but you won’t return the time ..

          The "new independent Russia" ate ekranoplanes, like many other things.
          1. +7
            23 June 2021 11: 35
            Quote: Vladimir_2U
            Quote: Tlauicol
            And there were many such projects (ekranoplanes, Sea lions ..) I don’t mind the money, but you won’t return the time ..

            The "new independent Russia" ate ekranoplanes, like many other things.

            Yeah, all over the world.
            1. +15
              23 June 2021 11: 39
              Quote: Tlauicol
              Yeah, all over the world.

              Do you know a lot of combat electronic devices "all over the world", or heavy RK "Energia", or orbital stations?
              1. -6
                23 June 2021 12: 29
                a little, because the smart ones learn from the mistakes of others and build a normal fleet and aviation. and rightly so.
                and the program of combat EPs was closed under Andropov (KGB), not Yeltsin. Project RTO Hurricane too request
                1. +15
                  23 June 2021 14: 58
                  Quote: Tlauicol
                  because the smart ones learn from the mistakes of others and build a normal fleet and aviation. and rightly so.
                  Some kind of liberal mantra. What does Russia not do with super-heavy launch vehicles and orbital stations because it has learned from other people's mistakes?
                  Quote: Tlauicol
                  the combat EP program was closed under Andropov (KGB)
                  Lies or ignorance
                  The first "Lun" was laid in 1983 at the "Volga" pilot plant located at the Central Design Bureau in the city of Gorky. On July 16, 1986, the first ekranoplan was launched into the water [7], followed by redirection to the city of Kaspiysk for further tests and completion of the apparatus. Design trials began in March 1987, and factory trials in July 1989. On December 26, 1989, the state tests came to an end. In 1990, the ekranoplan was transferred to trial operation, which was completed a year later - in 1991 [3].
                  1. -4
                    23 June 2021 15: 06
                    have you heard about the Eaglets? combat EPs, in terms of building 120 pieces. The program is closed on anyone? ... as well as the Hurricane.
                    P.S. By the ears of space in the theme of the fleet, drag. Add more gas production
                    1. +5
                      23 June 2021 15: 15
                      Quote: Tlauicol
                      have you heard about the Eaglets? combat EPs, in terms of building 120 pieces. The program is closed on anyone? ... as well as the Hurricane.
                      It was closed for financial reasons, firstly, and secondly, it was the landing craft. So to compare the landing boat, and in fact the Eaglet was with the MRK which Lun was, this far-fetched comparison.

                      Quote: Tlauicol
                      P.S. By the ears of space in the theme of the fleet, drag. Add more gas production
                      Words about "smart people all over the world" are far-fetched.
                      1. -13
                        23 June 2021 15: 39
                        you are right, not all people in the world are smart, and reading your comments, you understand that you will step on the rake more than once with dreams of a wunderwaffe
                      2. +1
                        24 June 2021 04: 27
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        you will come more than once with dreams of a wunderwaffe

                        EP is a niche device like MRK and missile boats, it's just better than them, so EP as a wunderwaffe is YOUR fantasy. And yes, I'm right, not all people are smart, not all have mastered heavy launch vehicles, orbital stations, ekranoplanes and skeg rocket ships on the VP.

                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        And there were many such projects (ekranoplanes, Sivuchi

                        By the way, Sivuch is a skeg ship on the VP, like a missile boat of the Skjold type and a minesweeper - a mine seeker of the “Oksoy” type, but you, as a typical follower of liberal mantras, are ignorant and do not know such things.
                      3. -2
                        24 June 2021 06: 36
                        But where can I, wretched, know about skegs request Maybe you, my lord, tell me why the sea lions stopped building, how they differed from other skegs, and why they no longer walk at full speed, although they do not get out of repairs?
                        Just don't get lost in space and ballet, I beg you!
                      4. 0
                        24 June 2021 06: 59
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        Maybe you, my lord, tell me why the sea lions stopped building, how they differed from other skegs, and why they no longer walk at full speed, although they do not get out of repairs?
                        It is enough that they were skeg-type on the VP, and you ranked them as dead-ends, on the basis of "world experience", as for defects, so the norgi took them into account in their ships, probably.


                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        Just don't get lost in space and ballet, I beg you!
                        Do not shove liberal mantras and you will be happy.
                2. 0
                  30 June 2021 18: 26
                  Lunya personally observed the flight in the summer of 89 in Kaspiysk - is this the Andropov era?
                  1. 0
                    1 July 2021 02: 54
                    Quote: kaban7
                    Lunya personally observed the flight in the summer of 89 in Kaspiysk - is this the Andropov era?

                    And the Hurricane and the Eaglets went until the 90s, so what?
              2. +7
                23 June 2021 14: 06
                Quote: Vladimir_2U
                You know a lot of combat EPs "all over the world"

                It's just that those who are technically able to build ekranoplanes have long worked out the interaction of aviation and the fleet. And they don't have to reinvent the wheel at the junction of two environments.
                In fact, an ekranoplan is a subsonic low-maneuverable target, with rudimentary air defense and seaplane survivability. Which cannot hide at low altitudes, since the normal Navy has aviation that serves as their "over-the-horizon eyes". And for aviation, long-range detection of a target with the size of a small rocket ship traveling at subsonic speed over water (to the delight of the SDC) is not a problem.
                1. +3
                  23 June 2021 14: 54
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  In fact, an ekranoplane is a subsonic low-maneuverable target, with rudimentary air defense and seaplane survivability.
                  An ekranoplan of the "Lun" type is the ultimate form of a high-speed small rocket ship with a non-displacement main mode of travel.

                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  survivability of the seaplane
                  There are no seaplanes with a minimum thickness of 4 mm hull plating, and there are no combat boats.
                  1. +3
                    23 June 2021 15: 20
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    An ekranoplan of the "Lun" type is the ultimate form of a high-speed small rocket ship with a non-displacement main mode of travel.

                    Combining all the disadvantages of an aircraft and a ship. From the ship, she took the dimensions and maneuverability, from the aircraft - strength and protection.
                    Quote: Vladimir_2U
                    There are no seaplanes with a minimum thickness of 4 mm hull plating, and there are no combat boats.

                    You need to lift the RTO into the air. So, in any case, you will have to reduce the strength rates in order to reduce the weight of the structure.
                    1. +1
                      23 June 2021 15: 33
                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      Combining all the disadvantages of an aircraft and a ship. From the ship, she took the dimensions and maneuverability, from the aircraft - strength and protection.

                      Garbage, from MRK Lun took strike capabilities, radar means, radio reconnaissance and electronic warfare, seaworthiness and autonomy, by the way, the cruising range is almost equal to the Gadfly, from the plane the speed of exit to the patrol area.

                      Quote: Alexey RA
                      You need to lift the RTO into the air. So, in any case, you will have to reduce the strength rates in order to reduce the weight of the structure.
                      Why lift 600 tons? Why lift 45 people with food and water supplies for them and beds for them when only 11-12 people can be lifted? Why raise the masts of the RES when there is a keel, why raise the air ducts and gas ducts of the engine room when there is no engine room at all? In general, a lot of things do not need to be raised. And the norms are underestimated, perhaps in comparison with the naval ones, but they are many times overestimated against the aviation ones.

                      Do not rush to answer, I myself will be off for n-tzat hours.
      3. +5
        23 June 2021 07: 15
        Quote: Lech from Android.
        all the same, they walked ahead of the whole planet along this part,

        Well, not quite ahead, rather head to head - American "Pegasus" in 6 copies (and not very cheap) and the same ended their careers in the 90s
        1. +8
          23 June 2021 07: 34
          Pegasus like with constantly submerged wings and a water cannon. They cost 250 tons of displacement. The purpose and composition of the weapons are similar. I don't know what the case is made of. Used actively.
          1. +7
            23 June 2021 07: 41
            The wings are lifting, themselves made of aluminum, one of the first carriers of "Harpoons" (8 pieces), the range at 38 knots is more than 1200 miles.
          2. +5
            23 June 2021 10: 52
            "Pegasus" had lifting wings
    2. +4
      23 June 2021 06: 29
      Yes, you take higher, what is the scope of engineering! I adore those who created this. The ship was great! Required crew over-conscripts.
      1. +5
        23 June 2021 07: 06
        Quote: d1975
        Yes, you take higher, what is the scope of engineering! I adore those who created this. The ship was great! Required crew over-conscripts.

        what for? Protect Foros? Carry mail? With such autonomy from him as good as from a goat of milk. Onshore installations will be covered more.
  2. +4
    23 June 2021 07: 32
    There was a country that could do this and, most importantly, wanted it. There is only memory left.
    1. +5
      23 June 2021 10: 40
      There was a country that could do this and, most importantly, wanted it. There is only memory left.

      Not. There is still a better future still possible for us, if, of course, we change our minds. And we will build it - on the mighty foundation of that particular country.
  3. +7
    23 June 2021 07: 42
    Thanks to the author. I read it with interest.
    1. +1
      23 June 2021 15: 14
      Hi Igor hi , I saw him in Sevastopol. In nature, he is much more impressive than in photography.
      1. +1
        23 June 2021 15: 16
        And I regret that I have never seen a close military ship in general. Neither big nor small request
        1. +1
          23 June 2021 15: 36
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          And I regret that I have never seen a close military ship in general. Neither big nor small request

          Have you not been to Sevastopol during the Soviet era? I happened several times. Pleased to the eye.
          PS. Well, I saw enough at the exercises YUG-90. We are, according to the legend of the teachings. reflected the landing from the sea.
        2. +4
          23 June 2021 15: 36
          An unforgettable sight, especially when you pass close by on a boat. I also caught sight of our old artillery cruisers of the Sverdlov class (project 68 bis), they generally made an indelible impression.
          1. -1
            23 June 2021 15: 41
            So earlier it was a "closed" city. A girl from Sevastopol studied with me. She had a special pass.
            In Odessa, I saw the ship "Taras Shevchenko" close by. He was standing near the seaport. A tanker was looming in the roadstead near Kherson.
            That's all my observations of the ships!))) smile
            1. +1
              23 June 2021 15: 47
              With Sevastopol it was easier for us, from the Kherson Museum a request by name came and we were issued temporary passes by the police, and so - yes, you can't enter the city. True, in the early nineties there the mind was already a gateway.
              1. +1
                23 June 2021 16: 37
                In 1979 he saw the "Comrade" under sails. abeam Tarkhankut. I watched from the board of m / v Adjara. Unforgettably.
          2. -1
            23 June 2021 16: 25
            Konstantin, this is the cruiser "Mikhail Kutuzov" in Novorossiysk, stands at the seaport, still stands now. Somehow in 2002, on November 30, we were drinking with the commander and the chief officer. The first mate arranged a tour for us, a packet of vodka with him, we stopped in each room, "charged" and told the first mate ... I liked the wardroom campaign, the finish with bog oak, paintings, a piano.
            1. +2
              23 June 2021 16: 34
              Hi Aleksey hi ... I had a chance to visit only the "Thirty-bis" and the diesel engine 641 of the project, everything else I saw only from the outside. Apart from the WFD and the Kazbek rescuer, everyone is also in Sevastopol.
              1. +4
                23 June 2021 16: 46
                Hello, minusyor, at least you could explain in Russian why you didn't like the ships, which even our sworn enemies consider very successful.
                Well, you are "One word - Romanian". laughing
              2. +1
                23 June 2021 17: 41
                Greetings, this is now a museum, civilian personnel. And at the time of my .... Visit, the cruiser was still in the Navy, it was registered with the NVMB, there a team of sailors of 30-40 people was serving there. Yes, another moment, not a sailor, I do not know what it is called, the military from other units used it, in its superstructure (right?) At the level of about 5-6 floors there was some kind of military post, two guys were in field camouflage, or border guards either ... God knows.
                1. 0
                  23 June 2021 17: 45
                  Yes, anything could be there, the devices were not dismantled from it. Both border guards and aviation could be used, there are many options.
                  1. 0
                    23 June 2021 17: 51
                    It seems like some kind of surveillance service. And what and why? HZ. There it was not about the equipment, but about the height above the port, from such a height almost the entire bay was at a glance.
          3. +1
            23 June 2021 18: 51
            I also caught sight of our old artillery cruisers of the Sverdlov class (project 68-bis),

            Me too, in the mid-70s I regularly went by boat to the North side by "Zhdanov". And later, already in this century, it turned out that in the mid-70s the fathers of the wives (father-in-law) of my eldest and youngest son served as sailors on cruisers of the 68th project - one on "Zhdanov", the other on "Ushakov".
            1. +1
              23 June 2021 19: 42
              in the middle of 70's

              Wow, they could have crossed somewhere on B. Morskaya or Grafskaya. smile drinks
              1. 0
                23 June 2021 19: 47
                drinks They could have. In 1973 and in 1975 I had a rest in the summer camp "Sevastopol", which is on the North (street Simonok 62). Now there is a number, like, 68.
                1. +1
                  23 June 2021 19: 55
                  And our "brigade" mainly lived in the ancient Chersonesos, but visited the North on a regular basis, acquaintances there were from local children.
                  1. 0
                    23 June 2021 20: 22
                    Chersonesos also fell in love, but later, in the 90s. The local historian, Kostya Kolontaev, then showed both the 35th battery and the surroundings. There are still remains of trucks and practical 12-inch shells under water. He warned me that at the bottom of ancient Chersonesos there might be chemical ammunition from the KCHF naval aviation, I did not find anything - and I didn’t really try.
                    1. +2
                      23 June 2021 20: 49
                      It's a pity that Kolontayev did not know, although in the nineties there, in comparison with the seventies, the staff of museums changed more than once. The quarantine bay near Chersonesos was climbed repeatedly in the equipment - there is no ammunition there, after each storm it washes away only fragments of amphorae and tiles, the same is in Streletskaya. Yes, and the navy divers crawled everything there, in Karantinka there was a Diving Training and Training Base (VUTS) of the Black Sea Fleet, they got us air and clogged. For the 35th I will not say, the catacombs all climbed, but did not go under the water there, but in Akhtiarka, near the Konstantinovsky ravelin, then there was still a drowned transport jug, the superstructures were cut off and only rusty frames protruded from the water, the WFD was moored directly to them and walked in the holds for crabs, there was an abyss of them, stone, then boiled in sea water. Eh, there was a time. smile drinks
                      1. 0
                        23 June 2021 21: 35
                        Well, I think the chemical munitions have been dumped somewhere further from the coast. There is such a fact - the naval aviation had them, but they were not delivered to the Caucasus. Kostya Kolontaev graduated from the Simferopol History Faculty in the late 80s, worked as a museum employee, in the mid-90s both of us published in "Duel", took his phone number in the editorial office and crossed paths in Sevastopol. Then at 35 there was still no complex, but there were a lot of bones (I think, German and Romanian, ours lay deeper). In Peschaniy, 300 meters from the coast, there is a broken barge with German bombs - 10 kg of lighters and 250 kg of high-explosive lighters. I showed the photo to my father - he clearly identified them. Maybe he drowned this barge himself - the order was simple - our ships are not there, to sink everything, especially at night. I spoke with the village leadership, they reasonably stated that they are lying there, and they are not bothering anyone, and if you get it, then problems will begin.
                      2. +1
                        23 June 2021 22: 06
                        Yes, there is a lot of things on the ground, not far from Laspi, for example, there is the German BDB, what is there in its holds, some Germans know that when I was there everything was clogged with sand. The border guards asked us to lift the "black diggers" with their own scuba diving upstairs, of course. The guys were digging something in the holds with sapper shovels (!!!) fool , well, what they were looking for there, the border guards then figured it out, we did not ask, one devil will not say. smile
                    2. 0
                      27 June 2021 12: 26
                      Kostya Kolontaev - a ghost from the 90s, fed by the then liberal myths lol There have never been any "chemical munitions of the KCHF naval aviation" laughing
                      Practical shells in the turret compartments of the 35th battery lay until 2001.
                      At the bottom of the Golubaya Bay were barges with ammunition, wreckage of equipment, ours and the Germans, there was the last pier during the war, from where the troops left the encircled Sevastopol.
                      1. 0
                        27 June 2021 13: 47
                        Kostya Kolontaev - a ghost from the 90s, fed by the then liberal myths

                        A very interesting proposition. Did you know him personally?
  4. +6
    23 June 2021 08: 09
    Hoisting wings and columns due to insufficient depth in some harbors, isn't it already clear? When I first saw it at the wall, I thought - why should he have such strange antennas?
  5. +2
    23 June 2021 08: 23
    He's kind of in the movie, right? I watched for a long time. The watchdog on hydrofoils chased the violators. I don’t remember already.
    1. +7
      23 June 2021 09: 02
      The project 133 "Antares" border boat was shot in the film. If I'm not mistaken, two went to Ukraine. At the moment, they have been written off and cut - they cost a penny in metal ...
      1. +2
        23 June 2021 09: 22
        Thanks for the clarification. Intereseo who slapped you a minus.
        1. +7
          23 June 2021 11: 43
          The minus was put by those who were just cutting and selling scrap metal - they did not enter the money in the declaration ...
          1. 0
            23 June 2021 12: 00
            Maybe those who read the article
            In 1992, after the withdrawal from the fleet, the MRK sank after a fire in the Streletskaya Bay of Sevastopol. The ship was later raised and scrapped.

            so he also got to Ukraine? Or "this is different" :-)
            1. 0
              23 June 2021 14: 43
              Quote: Dimka75
              Or "this is different" :-)

              These are two different comrades and their departments are different!
      2. +4
        23 June 2021 10: 48
        Ukraine received 4 ships of this type - PSKA-103, PSKA-105, PSKA-108 and PSKA-115. All written off and disposed of (the last PSKA-115 in 2010)
  6. +12
    23 June 2021 08: 45
    Ships of another civilization.
    1. +6
      23 June 2021 09: 41
      Quote: bbss
      Ships of another civilization.

      Impressive, yes ... We tried, and not for the sake of money! And for the COUNTRY !!!
    2. +3
      23 June 2021 11: 57
      Alas, the armor of our ancestors is not always up to us.
  7. +4
    23 June 2021 09: 34
    I saw him, he was standing in "Ugolnaya" in 89, the author writes that he sank in "Streletskaya" in 92, I served in this bay and he was not there, at least until May 92, then I quit DMB.
    1. +1
      23 June 2021 14: 49
      Quote: Sailor
      I saw him, he was standing in "Ugolnaya" in 89, the author writes that he sank in "Streletskaya" in 92, I served in this bay and he was not there

      He lived on Telefonka in a place with the MPK "Vladimir"

      This is their personal dock! Telephone pier, South Bay.
      1. +1
        24 June 2021 09: 00
        Yes, yes, there was also, this, as we called it, "eight-winged seven-screw", so that the moderators would not block.
  8. +1
    23 June 2021 12: 22
    Perhaps the author is not aware, but in Zelenodolsk small anti-submarine ships "Falcon" on hydrofoils of project 11451 were mass-produced. So they were even supplied abroad, and had rather good running characteristics for their class.
    You can learn more about them in the book "Checked by the Sea" about the Zelenodolsk Design Bureau.
    https://booksee.org/book/1343758
    1. +1
      23 June 2021 12: 45
      Curious to whom the 11451 were exported ??
      1. +2
        23 June 2021 12: 50
        Quote: Luty
        Curious to whom the 11451 were exported ??

        The book lists the GDR, Yugoslavia, Algeria, Libya, Cuba, Bulgaria - mostly 2-3 boats.
        There is a book "Falconry" where this ship is described in detail.
        1. +2
          23 June 2021 13: 34
          Quote: ccsr
          Quote: Luty
          Curious to whom the 11451 were exported ??

          The book lists the GDR, Yugoslavia, Algeria, Libya, Cuba, Bulgaria - mostly 2-3 boats.
          There is a book "Falconry" where this ship is described in detail.

          this is not so from the word at all. only two were built, two more were unfinished
          1. +1
            23 June 2021 18: 46
            Quote: Tlauicol
            this is not so from the word at all. only two were built, two more were unfinished

            Indeed, another book I refer to indicates that the Navy ordered only four ships:

            Well, then the collapse of the country went, and there was no time for these ships.
            So the complaints are not against me, but against the authors of the book.
            Quote: Serg65
            sometimes you shouldn't believe what is written in the books ...

            I do not even dispute this - I myself have seen how well-known historians sometimes carry nonsense when the question concerns military documents.
            Quote: Luty
            Project 11451 Existed in the amount of 4 units. Two of them have not been completed yet.

            Indeed, this is more accurate information. It's just that our industry sometimes loves to play it up in order to increase its worth, so they suffered about foreign sales. Or maybe the military themselves gave them this misinformation so that they lag behind with a proposal to bring the ships to their senses.
        2. +1
          23 June 2021 14: 55
          Quote: ccsr
          The book indicates

          sometimes you shouldn't believe what is written in the books .... Kukhanovich and Vladimirrets, after each going to sea, stood for a month in dry dock in the South Bay ..... and MRK-5 with them in line!
        3. +1
          23 June 2021 16: 08
          Project 11451 Existed in the amount of 4 units. Two of them have not been completed yet. So neither 11451 nor other projects of the USSR ships with a wing system were exported. Nobody at all. Even the TK project 206M went without wings, like the border boats on the same hull 206PE. Well, it's not surprising that the book is written by the same guys who draw posters for Victory Day with German tanks)))))
    2. 0
      23 June 2021 14: 52
      Quote: ccsr
      in Zelenodolsk were serially produced small anti-submarine ships "Sokol" on hydrofoils of project 11451

      what Serially? 2 in the days of the Union ... is this a series? This is a trial operation!
      Quote: ccsr
      So they were even delivered abroad

      recourse ..... Two boxes were built for the Ukrainian Navy ... they built, they built .. but they never finished it!
    3. 0
      23 June 2021 21: 23
      This is where they went for export ?!
  9. -1
    23 June 2021 15: 00
    An interesting article and well-written. Nice to read. Thank you
  10. 0
    23 June 2021 16: 13
    Eh, I remember how the "Comets" and later "Colchis" were once cut across the black sea. Odessa - Kherson, Nikolaev ... Somehow they left the ship of their father, after the border was closed. The families of the crew were removed from the dry cargo ship. And there was a storm warning. The last Comet was leaving (you can't stay in the hotel for several days). Our mothers decided - let's go! And let's go. They came to Odessa - the whole comet was cut off, their faces were blue, everyone was feeling bad. But it was a sight !!! follow the waves on the Comet !!! Now such impressions can be obtained only for a lot of money)) The show is not for the faint of heart.
  11. 0
    23 June 2021 17: 20
    that the insufficient level of training of conscripts became the cause of breakdowns and accidents on board.

    Project 705 nuclear submarine - an automatic submarine required a crew of warrant officers and officers. people who knew their specific management well. And on the NK it would be a little expensive to recruit dozens of contractors.
  12. 0
    23 June 2021 22: 23
    Cool, I haven't even heard of this, thanks.
  13. 0
    27 June 2021 11: 17
    To him yet to return, time will pass, the project will be obtained, finalized and made more fun and better
  14. +1
    27 June 2021 20: 17
    We did not have the honor to make lifting wings.
    But nevertheless * Falcon *, * Antares * had time.
    Then, the process of disintegration began ... And we cut the finished * Falcon * into scrap by ninety percent.
    I also broke my leg while cutting the wings.
    He took revenge on the steamer. I also hung them up in due time.
    Fodder ...
    1. +2
      28 June 2021 11: 02
      Hello everyone ! Since 1962, ships on hydrofoils have been serially produced.
      project 125A. The ships were assigned to the naval units of the border troops. Served
      on the Black and Baltic Seas. Maximum speed 65 knots. I served on this
      ship in 1964-66. Who wants to know in detail read the magazine "Border Guard".
  15. 0
    29 June 2021 17: 53
    "The ship was later raised and scrapped." - the crime!
  16. 0
    1 July 2021 16: 21
    Ships of a past more highly developed civilization
  17. 0
    1 July 2021 20: 57
    Still, there was a series of hydrofoil boats, I found them when they were no longer on the move ...: "In the 70s, a new ship project was developed for the maritime border units of the KGB of the USSR - project 133 code" Antares " , the main distinguishing feature of these ships was hydrofoils, although this idea was not new.
    The construction was entrusted to the Feodosia Production Association "More". In total, 11 ships of this type were built at this shipyard for the MCHPV of the KGB of the USSR, another project 133 ship has already been completed for the maritime border guards of Ukraine. This type of ship was not exported. Another feature of these ships was that this ship project was "purely" borderline, the USSR Navy did not accept such a ship project for its armament. Although the fleet considered such ships (on hydrofoils) as high-speed small anti-submarine ships, But after the development and construction of two prototypes (the projects were significantly different from the border Antares and in fact they were two completely different IPC projects) they abandoned this idea ... Thus, from the end of the 70s, only maritime border guards possessed hydrofoil warships with a high speed.
    At the moment, all ships of this type have been excluded from the border forces of Russia and Ukraine. In Russia, the latter were decommissioned PSKRs 109 and 110 (both in 2009), and in Ukraine PSKR-115 in 2010. "
  18. 0
    13 August 2021 16: 16
    its disadvantage was the overall complexity of operation. The ship, saturated with modern equipment and automation, turned out to be too complicated for the fleet, which consisted of conscripts. For efficient operation, the ship required a crew of professional sailors.

    And this is not the first time. Project 705 nuclear submarines, which are difficult to operate, also turned out to be a "tough nut to crack" for the crews. So the armament should correspond to the average level of crew training. There is no question of conscripts. About contract soldiers and officers training and education for several months
  19. 0
    8 September 2021 16: 52
    what we do not store, the operation of complex equipment must of course be professionals.