Military Review

Unique record C-130 Hercules - landing and taking off from an aircraft carrier

10
Unique record C-130 Hercules - landing and taking off from an aircraft carrier

When experts consider the achievements and characteristics of the C-130 “Hercules” transport aircraft, certainly one of the most striking are the events that took place in October-November of the 1963 year.
In 1963, the US Navy was looking for an opportunity to replenish consumable supplies on aircraft carriers without entering the base and leaving combat patrol areas.
One of the options was the idea to use the transport aircraft "Hercules", more than 10 years in service.

"Hercules" at the car wash


The US Navy decided to try to land the C-130 "Hercules" on an aircraft carrier.
Was it possible to do this in practice?
Who would have guessed that a large, four-engined aircraft that has a performance characteristics:
Length: 29,79 m
Wingspan: 40,41 m
Main rotor diameter: 4,11 m
Height: 11,84 m
Curb weight: 53 230 kg (at + 2,5g)
Normal take-off weight: 70 305 kg (with typical load)
Maximum take-off weight: 79 380 kg
Takeoff run: 1 433 m (up to height 15 m)
Run length: 777 m (from height 15 m with a landing weight 58 967 kg)

will be able to land on the deck of an aircraft carrier and then take off?
This was not only possible, but was carried out in a moderately stormy sea in 500 miles from Boston in the North Atlantic.
At the same time, the aircraft became the largest and heaviest aircraft in the world that ever landed on an aircraft carrier and took off from it. A record that is not broken to this day.

When Lieutenant James H. Flatley III talked about a new mission, he thought that someone in the Navy had lost his mind.
“To land the C-130 on an aircraft carrier and then take off? You must be joking,” he said.
But no one was joking. The head of the command of naval operations ordered to prepare a feasibility study on the landing and take-off of a large turboprop aircraft for the USS Forrestal (CV-59). The Navy tried to find out if they could use the "Hercules" as a "Carrier for delivery". The aircraft previously used to solve such problems was the Grumman C-1 Trader (two piston engines with limited payloads and an 300-mile radius of action).
If the aircraft carrier is working in the ocean, it does not have a fast means of delivering ammunition and material resources. In order to get something, you need to get close to the land before you even take urgently needed cargo on board.
Hercules was perfect for this. But to imagine landing such an aircraft on an aircraft carrier and then taking off was in the spirit of Hollywood action films.

The KC-130F aircraft in the tanker-transport version (BuNo 149 798), belonging to the US Marine Corps, was delivered to the 8 on October 1963. Lockheed made only minor changes to the chassis, improved the braking system, added the ABS system, removed cables and refueling hoses from the deck of the aircraft carrier, and drew a white line along the axis of the deck to give direction to the pilot.
“The biggest concern was the maximum speed of descent — about nine meters per second,” Flatley said.
As it turned out, the aircraft in fact showed a significant margin.



In addition to Flatley, the crew consisted of Lt.Cmdr. WW Stovall - the co-pilot; ADR-1 EF Brennan - Flight Engineer and Engineer from Lockheed - Test Pilot Ted H. Limmer.
30 October 1963 was the first attempt at wind speed 40 knots.
In this case, the plane touched the deck, but without stopping to the end, continued acceleration and took off again.

In general, the crew successfully conducted 29 such touch-and-go landings landings.

Then the 21 landing was carried out with a full stop and the 21 took off, all without the help of other mechanisms. The take-off weight in the experiments ranged from 85000 pounds to 121000 pounds (38555.35 kg - 54885 kg).
With a weight of 85000 pounds KC-130F reached a full stop after running 267 feet (81,38 m), approximately equal to two-fold wingspan of an airplane!
Navy specialists were surprised to find that even at maximum payload, the aircraft uses only 745 feet of deck for takeoff and 460 feet for landing.
The distance from the end of the wing of the aircraft to the "island" (flight control tower) was just under 15 feet.



Lockheed Chief Engineer E. Flock was on board the aircraft carrier to observe the tests. He recalls: “The sea was quite turbulent that day. I was on the captain’s bridge. I was looking at the man on the prow of the ship and saw that he was moving up and down 30 feet when he was going.” The speed of the aircraft carrier was increased to 10 nodes, as well as reduced yaw and it is oriented in the direction against the wind. Thus, when the plane landed, it had from 40 to 50 knots of headwind speed.
“This plane stopped right in front of the captain’s bridge,” recalls Flock.
"There was applause and laughter. And on the side of the aircraft’s fuselage facing us, there was a big sign" LOOK MA, NO HOOK. "
From the accumulated data as a result of these tests, the Navy concluded that, using the Hercules C-130, it would be possible to deliver 25000 pounds of cargo to 2.500 miles and land it on an aircraft carrier.
Despite the positive data received, the idea seemed too risky for routine operations and the plane was too large to fit on the aircraft carrier elevators or in its hangars. Being on deck seriously hampered all other operations and interfered with other aircraft.

The Navy decided to abandon this idea, using later aircraft significantly lower take-off weight.
Flatley received from fleet Distinguished Flying Cross award.



"Hercules" - "record holder" was used until May 2003 and was placed in the National Museum of the Marine aviation (NAS) in Pensacola, Florida. Its tail number is BuNo149798.


Author:
10 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ward
    ward 1 September 2012 09: 14
    +3
    Everything is fine ... but the landing tension for the pilots was unbelievable ... the pilots were later suspended from flights due to the unacceptable state of the nervous system ... plus ...
  2. biglow
    biglow 1 September 2012 09: 43
    +2
    it would be good for the author to translate all sizes into the metric system
    1. postman
      2 September 2012 02: 06
      +3
      Translated, first.
      agree:
      Take-off weight in experiments ranged from 85000 pounds
      Take-off weight in experiments ranged from 38555.35kg
      Does it sound different?
      Which m ... k will weigh 350 gr to 38 555 kg in an airplane?
      The record was in utahs and pounds.!
      In the U.S.
      Further there is an on-line calculator
  3. sasha127
    sasha127 1 September 2012 15: 27
    +2
    Impressive!
  4. Drednout
    Drednout 1 September 2012 15: 40
    +3
    Brave kids. Such a fool and on such a patch! Really impressive.
  5. Pimply
    Pimply 1 September 2012 16: 13
    +7
    Well, knowing the unique capabilities of "Hercules" and watching it live - I'm not surprised. Incredible car
  6. Kostyanich
    Kostyanich 1 September 2012 18: 05
    0
    but not easier to buy from the Russian BE-200 and not steamed landing on the deck?
    1. Darck
      Darck 1 September 2012 21: 14
      +5
      At that time, the Be200 wasn’t in the bud, to put the plane on the water, to pull supplies from it in the conditions of war .... as if not the best idea.
    2. postman
      2 September 2012 02: 09
      +2
      Quote: kostyanich
      but not easier to buy from the Russian BE-200

      At that time (1963), there were 35 years left before the "birth" (first flight) of the BU.
      Would have worn out waiting
  7. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 2 September 2012 19: 46
    +2
    What can I say? .. Only the fact that good equipment with a professionally trained crew literally works wonders ...
    Impressive however ...
  8. desava
    desava 2 September 2012 20: 58
    +4
    AC-130, really, is good for its take-off and landing characteristics. It was he who was used to save the hostages in Entebbe. He had good qualities.
  9. Yan005
    Yan005 4 September 2012 19: 17
    +2
    Interestingly, and the B-52 is weak to plant?
    1. bazilio
      bazilio 6 September 2012 13: 45
      +1
      B52- will not fit in width, wings are very good. long
  10. USNik
    USNik 30 June 2013 17: 08
    0
    In general, the crew successfully conducted 29 such touch-and-go landings landings.
    Damn it, I didn't even know. In vain did the facepalm in the cinema on "World War Z" ...