Siebel Ferries. Universal combat weapon

44

Siebel ferry in the modification of a heavy air defense ferry on Ladoga

History the combat ferry, which was used both to transport troops and as floating air defense batteries, and sometimes as artillery support ships, began in the summer of 1940. The development of the ferry was directly linked to German plans to land on the British Isles as part of Operation Sea Lion.

Siebel Ferry Building Process


The main purpose of the new ship was to be the transfer of troops and cargo when crossing the English Channel. The operation was planned on a large-scale, the Germans would need a huge number of landing vehicles to carry it out, which the Wehrmacht categorically lacked. At the same time, it was necessary to develop and build ships in a short time, until the weather worsens and the season of storms begins.



One of the proposed options for landing vehicles was the Siebel ferries, which got their name from the name of their creator - Luftwaffe Lieutenant Colonel Friedrich Wilhelm Siebel. He was a pilot, designer and entrepreneur. He had an engineering education even before the Second World War.

The education came in handy to Siebel, when representatives of the sapper units of the Wehrmacht approached him, who were faced with the task of preparing landing vehicles for crossing the English Channel. At that time, the lieutenant colonel was in Amiens at the local aircraft plant and was engaged in the restoration of production at the enterprise. The appeal of the sappers who did not really hope for help fleet, interested the officer. And he literally in the same place proposed an option with the combination of two pontoon sections.

The project was as simple as possible. Two parallel pontoon sections were interconnected by transverse steel beams. The structure was set in motion aviation a motor installed between the pontoons on a special pylon. The first version, whipped up, was tested on a lake near Berlin. The ferry reached a speed of no more than 4 knots (7 km / h) and did not impress the military. In addition, it did not have a deck, it could only carry infantry and light cargo.


Lieutenant Colonel Siebel and Finnish Army Colonel Järvinen, 1942

However, as you know, appetite comes with eating.

The newly minted Luftwaffe officer, who had worked in the aviation industry for a long time before the war, could not be dragged away by the ears from the new project. Ferry development continued with Siebel constantly increasing their size.

The length of the next ferry was doubled, starting to dock two pontoons in tandem. In total, it already consisted of four pontoons, on top of which it was decided to make a steel deck. This at the same time increased the strength of the structure and made it possible to transport heavy weapons or vehicles by ferry.

The power stop was made combined. In addition to the aircraft engine with a pulling propeller with a capacity of 450 liters. with., used two automobile motors with propellers. It was planned that the aircraft engine would be the main propulsion of the ferry, and the propellers would be mainly used for maneuvering.

The extended version of the ferry was successfully tested and received the designation LF40 - "light ferry model 1940". The ferry, which weighed 8 tons without cargo, showed a speed of 8 knots (15 km / h) during tests.

The military liked the model. And they placed an order for 400 units, of which 150 were ready. Further production was canceled due to the appearance of new modifications.


Heavy steam SF40 with aircraft engines and propellers

Already on August 31, 1940, a new ferry was successfully tested on the Ems River. This time the heavy version. Carrying capacity and dimensions have grown significantly. The number of pontoons in the structure doubled again. The heavy ferry Siebel received the designation SF40 (schwere fahre).

Initially, each float of the catamaran ferry was assembled from four separate pontoon sections into a single structure. Over time, the use of pontoons was completely abandoned. As a result, the float became one third wider and already consisted of 9 separate sections, which were sequentially attached to each other.

Tests of this model on the Ems river proved the success of the project.

The catamaran ferry demonstrated good seaworthiness and excellent maneuverability. Turns were made by reducing the number of turns of the propellers of the left or right float. Moreover, the Siebel ferry could turn in almost one place. At the same time, the speed remained at the level of 8 knots.

Already in September 1940, the first 27 heavy ferries were built. All of them then went to North Africa.

Technical features of Siebel heavy ferries


The first version of the heavy ferry, designated SF40, had a maximum length of 21,75 meters. The deck width of the ferry was 14,2 meters. The maximum draft in comparison with the LF40 version has doubled and reached 1,2 meters.

The weight of the ferry without cargo was about 130 tons. The carrying capacity of the Siebel heavy ferry in this version reached 60 tons (or 120 soldiers with full armament).

The transport crew consisted of 11-14 people.

Siebel Ferries. Universal combat weapon
Heavy steam SF40 without propellers

The power plant was combined. And it included 4 car engines, which were installed in pairs in the left and right floats.

Each pair of engines ran on its own propeller with a diameter of 60 cm. Usually, two types of car engines were used: a licensed version of the 8 hp Ford V-78. from. or "Opel Blitz" with a capacity of 68 liters. from.

The basis of the power plant on the SF40 version was made up of three deformed aircraft engines BMW-VI with pushing propellers (660 hp in total).

The use of aircraft engines on ferries was quickly abandoned.

First, they made so much noise that it was simply impossible to talk while on deck.

Secondly, three aircraft engines consumed too much fuel. Crews preferred to launch them only in exceptional cases.

Already in 1941, the ferry was tested with an additional outboard motor, but without aircraft engines. The speed decreased by only a couple of knots, while the removal of the aircraft engines from the ferry increased the usable deck space and the carrying capacity, which increased to 70 tons (or 250 soldiers with weapons). The version received the designation SF41.

At the same time, it was precisely as Siebel ferries that the versions equipped only with propellers were better known.

These ferries have added a little more in size. The length of the floats reached 24–26 meters. The width remains the same. The empty displacement increased to 130 tons. And the maximum carrying capacity is up to 100 tons.


As a power plant, two derated aircraft engines from BMW were used. To preserve engine life and fuel economy, their power was reduced to 240 liters. from. Each of them was completely located in the body of the float and worked on its own propeller. The speed of such catamaran ferries was 6-7 knots. And the cruising range reached 116 miles. At the same time, by 1944, this figure was already brought to 285 miles.

Since 1943, the production of the larger Siebel ferries (Siebelfahre) began.

The main difference from its predecessors was the appearance of a streamlined nose on the model. This decision made it possible to increase the speed of ferries to 11 knots (20,4 km / h), although it worsened the manufacturability of the design and ease of manufacture.

The 1943 models were the largest of all ferries. Their length reached 32 meters. The empty displacement increased to 143 tons. Carrying capacity - up to 169 tons. At the same time, the maximum draft of the vessel also increased - up to 1,75 meters.

Heavy and light air defense ferries


Quite quickly, the Germans decided to use the landing craft both as floating air defense batteries and as artillery support ships.

Since Siebel's ferries passed through the Luftwaffe, anti-aircraft artillery was massively installed on them. Initially, the 1940 ferries had only one anti-aircraft machine gun. But already on the 1941 modification, which was used for transportation to North Africa, one 37-mm anti-aircraft gun and two 20-mm anti-aircraft machine guns appeared.


Heavy air defense ferry (Siebelfähre 40 Schwere Flakkampffähre)

The next step was the appearance of light and heavy air defense ferries.

In the version of the heavy air defense ferry (Siebelfähre 40 Schwere Flakkampffähre), up to 3-4 of the famous anti-aircraft 88-mm guns were installed on the catamaran, which could be supplemented with auxiliary fire weapons. For example, two 20-mm anti-aircraft guns.

On such ferries, only the wheelhouse was booked. The armor of its walls was 10 mm. The shields of the 88 mm flasks had the same thickness of armor, the rest of the hull was ordinary structural steel. The crew of such ferries reached 47 people.

In the version of the light air defense ferry (Siebelfähre 40 Leichte Flakkampffähre), the armament was represented by small-caliber artillery. Since 1942, the following armament has been massively used: four "firlings" (quad 20-mm C / 38 assault rifle - the naval version of the Flakvierling 38), placed on the bow and stern sections of the ferry. As well as one 37 mm Flak-Lafette C / 36 automatic gun (naval version of the FlaK 36 mount) on the central superstructure. The crew of such a ferry reached 42 people.


Light air defense ferry (Siebelfähre 40 Leichte Flakkampffähre) on Ladoga

At the same time, the composition and number of weapons changed frequently.

From the photographs that have come down to us and newsreels, we can talk about a variety of combinations of small-caliber anti-aircraft artillery and 88-mm anti-aircraft guns.

At the same time, even in the version of the light air defense ferry, the composition of the anti-aircraft armament of the Siebel ferry approximately corresponded to the destroyers of those years.

Project Evaluation


Siebel's versatile combat ferries turned out to be somewhat more expensive than originally planned. And their design has become more complex over time.

But, despite this, they played their role in the war, having established themselves as a universal combat means. They were used to transport troops and cargo, as air defense ferries and artillery support, and even in the version of minelayers.

Ferry production was carried out practically throughout the entire war. The manufacturability of the design made it possible to assemble Siebel ferries even at small enterprises. Including on the territory of the countries occupied by the Nazis.

In total, at least 150 light LF40 ferries were built, which were replaced by the heavy Siebel ferries SF40 / 41/43.

Between September 1940 and 1945, at least 393 Siebel heavy ferries were built. At least a series of Siebel-type amphibious catamarans (according to sequential numbering) ended on the SF-393 ferry.


Siebel ferry carries two tank Pz.III Ausf.L and Tiger heavy tank in Tunis, 1943

Siebel's ferries, designed for the transfer of troops across the English Channel, were eventually noted in all theaters of operations in Europe.

They were used in the Mediterranean and Black Seas, and fought in the Baltic.

The possibility of disassembling and transporting ferries in the form of separate sections by rail made it possible to use the "Siebel" and on the lakes. In particular, they managed to fight on Ladoga and Lake Peipsi.

At the same time, the main disadvantage of ferries throughout the war was not their technical features or design flaws, but departmental affiliation. The ferry created by the Luftwaffe engineer was produced for the German Air Force and was subordinate to the Goering department with all the ensuing consequences.

The crews of such ferries did not have proper maritime and navigational training, which was most clearly manifested on Ladoga in the summer-autumn of 1942. Operation Brazil carried out here in October 1942 ended in complete failure. A squadron of 38 pennants that went to the island of Sukho, which included 11 Siebel artillery ferries (7 heavy and 4 light), three transport, headquarters and hospital ferries, ended in nothing. At the same time, the Germans suffered significant losses in people and equipment.


Soviet troops are crossing the water barrier on the captured Siebel ferry

The Siebel ferries were mainly used for their intended purpose.

Since 1943, they have been actively used to transport troops and cargo. But no longer for the landing of assault forces, but for the evacuation of German troops, which were retreating on all fronts under the blows of the Allied armies.

At the same time, some of the captured ferries in the USSR were repaired and used in operations against the Germans.

The most formidable variants, armed with the famous 88-mm anti-aircraft guns, were used as floating air defense systems, as well as in the role of escort or strike ships.

But in the role of the latter, they were used much less often, unlike their naval colleagues - lighters of the MNL type, which in the Soviet, and then already in the Russian classification, are better known as high-speed landing barges.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    23 March 2021 18: 08
    A well-designed technique is always in demand.
    1. -7
      23 March 2021 19: 03
      And Russophobes for 80 years went to shit, proving that Germany did not have watercraft for crossing the English Channel and that is only why they did not occupy the British Isles.
      1. +7
        23 March 2021 19: 13
        Quote: Operator
        only because of this they did not occupy the British Isles.

        We WILL NOT interpret all doubts, the matter is absolutely empty.
        And there were many more than one reasons. This is usually the case.
      2. +12
        23 March 2021 20: 32
        Quote: Operator
        And Russophobes for 80 years went to shit, proving that Germany did not have watercraft for crossing the English Channel and that is only why they did not occupy the British Isles.

        and the ferries themselves would fight off the royal cruisers?
        1. -5
          23 March 2021 20: 56
          Royal cruisers in the English Channel would have been sunk by Luftwaffe dive bombers, apparently.
          1. +1
            10 May 2021 20: 51
            Quote: Operator
            Royal cruisers in the English Channel would have been sunk by Luftwaffe dive bombers, apparently.

            And how should dive bombers fight off the Hurricanes with the Spitfires?
            1. -3
              10 May 2021 21: 29
              Messerschmitts, obviously.

              Glass wool, you better think about yourself - how will you fight off 85-FZ in three weeks bully
              1. 0
                11 May 2021 08: 17
                Quote: Operator
                Glass wool, you better think about yourself - how will you fight off 85-FZ in three weeks

                I am not engaged in educational activities, strictly the opposite laughing
                And the law is correct.
                And then the YouTubers got divorced, each blowing his own tune - the head swells.
                A Gleichschaltung should have been held for a long time.
                And at the same time it doesn’t hurt to remind hamsters that “blogger” is not a profession, and parasitism from donations will no longer work.
        2. +2
          25 March 2021 08: 48
          So that the Germans don't have something? This is a nation of engineers. Learn and learn from them!
          1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +3
        23 March 2021 23: 46
        So there were no such floating craft for crossing, it is not on self-propelled barges to transfer a mass of troops. The Royal Navy was still strong at the time.
        Much more questions are caused by the lack of enthusiasm of the Reich command in the very preparation for the landing operation. Attacking the USSR as well, opening a third front, was perhaps the worst decision of all available.
        1. 0
          24 March 2021 01: 19
          What does the second / third front have to do with it - we are talking about one single Western front with the aim of occupying the British Isles until the moment of the German attack on the USSR and Japan on the United States.

          At your leisure, familiarize yourself with the width of the English Channel and how the evacuation of the British Expeditionary Forces from Dunkirk was organized.
          1. +6
            24 March 2021 07: 32
            Quote: Operator
            At your leisure, familiarize yourself with the width of the English Channel and how the evacuation of the British Expeditionary Forces from Dunkirk was organized.

            at the same leisure, become familiar with the fact that the evacuation of Dunkirk byko was de facto allowed by Hitler and was unimpeded by the German troops.
            1. 0
              24 March 2021 14: 35
              So yes: the width of the English Channel in 1941 was an order of magnitude greater than 1940 laughing
            2. +2
              24 March 2021 19: 10
              Without getting up from the couch and without getting into the depths of the Internet, I can show that Hitler's stop-order was quite adequate and corresponded to the current situation. He had no other options.
          2. +2
            24 March 2021 16: 55
            Check out how Operation Overlord was organized at your leisure. Especially with regard to landing craft.
            1. +2
              24 March 2021 17: 26
              You compared .... with a finger: the defending Wehrmacht of the 1944 model and the defending British army of the 1941 model laughing
      4. +10
        24 March 2021 08: 31
        Quote: Operator
        for 80 years they went to shit, proving that Germany did not have watercraft for crossing the English Channel

        For me, the photo of Matilda is more interesting, because the anti-Soviet Germans stubbornly count only German tanks and self-propelled guns.
        1. +5
          24 March 2021 09: 13
          So there was Dunkirk and many other places where the Germans got a lot of things. They got hold of the whole geyrope, with all the goodies that were there.
          1. +4
            24 March 2021 09: 15
            Quote: rocket757
            So there was Dunkirk and many other places where the Germans got a lot of things.

            Yes, it is clear to sane people, unfortunately, humanity is not limited to them only.
            1. +3
              24 March 2021 09: 47
              Castrate history, and the resulting treat to the population is a nasty offense ...
              The upper then sho, they always expect that the bell, for them, will not ring! But the man in the street always gets everything in full.
        2. +2
          24 March 2021 12: 49
          Part of Matilda was captured in Africa.
          Well, in general, all sides used captured weapons and equipment.
    2. +4
      24 March 2021 08: 18
      Quote: rocket757
      A well-designed technique is always in demand.

      When reading military literature, I often came across descriptions of Siebel's participation in the battles of ferries, so few were released, but they managed a lot.
      1. +2
        24 March 2021 09: 12
        Everything is logical. A successful design and to the place came.
      2. +2
        25 March 2021 16: 42
        In addition to Siebel ferries, the Germans and Italians widely used high-speed landing barges (BDB) with the same armament and carrying capacity, but seaworthy and with a good cruising range. A total of 700 units were built. Germans and 100 pcs. Italians. This is a huge fleet that writers often forget about the 2 MB.
  2. +16
    23 March 2021 18: 18
    A very interesting article about the little-known technique of the Germans. good Sincere thanks to the Author.

    One question arises, the Author writes:
    The ferry created by the Luftwaffe engineer was produced for the German Air Force and was subordinate to the Goering department with all the ensuing consequences.
    , however, in the photo with the caption "Siebel ferry transports two Pz.III Ausf.L tanks and a heavy Tiger tank to Tunisia, 1943" quite clearly, in the foreground on the left, the officer of the Kriegsmarine is visible.
    So there was a reassignment after all?
    1. +9
      23 March 2021 20: 01
      I subscribe to your words. I read about "Siebel" only as a final floating craft, absolutely not knowing the history of creation.)
    2. +11
      23 March 2021 20: 36
      So there was a reassignment after all?
      Did not have. The Luftwaffe produced ferries for itself separately, the army separately.
      The army ferries were powered by a Ford V8 engine, while the Luftwaffe was powered by a BMV.
      1. +5
        23 March 2021 21: 14
        I see, what about the fleet? A naval lieutenant is standing there.
        1. 0
          24 March 2021 09: 57
          Quote: Sea Cat
          Officer Kriegsmarine is visible.

          Quote: Sea Cat
          I see, what about the fleet?

          He's in charge of the anchor! laughing Or we can assume that the photo was taken from the pier and there was a lot of German bastards.
      2. 0
        24 March 2021 03: 54
        I’m wondering if Siebel’s ferries were subordinate to the Luftwaffe, it turns out that the ferry’s navigator and the crew were from the Luftwaffe? Can a navigator pilot be a skipper?
        Earlier, looking through the options for landing barges (with / without ramps), I saw the Siebel ferry according to the catamaran scheme.
        In the hostilities on Lake Ladoga, if I am not mistaken, the Germans transferred such ferries to the operational management of the Finns.
        It seems to me that, after all, the Germans did not plan to use Siebel's "big" ferries for the transfer and landing of troops across the English Channel. In terms of seaworthiness, such ferries are more suitable for coastal operations, transportation (unloading / loading) in the inner roadstead, river crossing.
      3. +2
        24 March 2021 08: 23
        Quote: Undecim
        The Luftwaffe produced ferries for itself separately, the army separately.
        They were far from the Japanese with their "land" submarines! laughing
    3. +13
      23 March 2021 22: 43
      Constantine, tanks were loaded onto ferries in Reggio d'Calabria, unloaded in Bizerte, Tunisia (pictured in the article). It is 700 kilometers across the Mediterranean. The transportation was carried out by Luftwaffen-Fährenflotille IV and V. Naturally, the transportation was carried out as part of convoys. Therefore, the presence of sailors there is quite natural.

      Loading tanks in Reggio d'Calabria.
      1. +11
        23 March 2021 22: 57
        Victor, great! And you have no desire to write an article about the German BDB, I went to the Black Sea for one drowned man from this series with the merciful permission of the border guards, but there is little left there, the depth is small.
        1. +14
          23 March 2021 23: 10
          Do you mean Marinefährprahme?

          Somehow, I do not add up to articles for VO. As the desire was discouraged, I still cannot wrap my head around.
          1. +9
            24 March 2021 01: 10
            Yes, it is these ships, they say, were of a very successful design.

            And about the articles ... I am sincerely sorry. Surely I would be able to get answers to some questions, And so, in a conversation, you will not immediately remember what you wanted to know. smile
          2. 0
            25 March 2021 09: 12
            Why do you need to turn around?)
        2. +2
          24 March 2021 01: 51
          In the area of ​​Geroyevka? There are even 2 barges.
  3. +1
    23 March 2021 19: 43
    In fact: transport, artillery support and air defense ships.
    It seems that it was "noted" in the Barents Sea as well.
  4. +5
    23 March 2021 19: 43
    These "ferries" were a "tough nut to crack" and they drank a lot of blood from our ancestors, especially on the Black Sea.
  5. +12
    23 March 2021 20: 10
    From the article I first heard about Operation Brazil and now read about the battle on Suho Island.
    4th hour strong hand-to-hand combat. The battery is bombed by planes. Out of 70 we have 13 left, 32 wounded, the rest fell. Cannons 3, fired 120 shots. Of the 30 pennants, 16 barges were sunk, 1 was taken prisoner. Many fascists were beaten ...
    Defense commander Gusev I.K.
    22th of October 1942
    - Memorial plaque on the island of Sukho

    It is a pity that such information is little known: (((
  6. +1
    24 March 2021 17: 41
    Thanks to the author for the excellent article, very interesting!
  7. +1
    25 March 2021 09: 10
    In despair of departmental conservatism, many people renounced doing business with specialists, for "a specialist is like a gumboil. Its completeness is one-sided." Actually, such a situation is the main problem of our time. People have invented and invented a lot more than can be mastered with the existing management structure.
    The engineer was a pilot. And the vehicles that he invented, despite their outstanding manufacturability, were pinched all over the war. And not only) NATO exercises have shown more than once or twice that the main problem of the amphibious assault is the lack of mooring facilities. And the ferry can be made cheaper, disposable, and safely throw it on the beach, on any low coast, thanks to its shallow draft and adapted shape. Or turn on the engines and mercilessly press it to the rock, ensuring the landing of the "cargo".
    Is anyone using this technique now? Hehe ... Why? Mainly because the ferry is not a ship. And the sailors don't want to deal with him. Stupid. So what? Mental acuity is not appreciated ... Our methods of control do not match our technique. Our leaders would have to steer the khan's rate, and large cities of ten thousand inhabitants, sorting out disputes between potters and goldsmiths ...
  8. 0
    April 30 2021 11: 39
    what an interesting photo with the trophy matilda2 on the ferry
  9. 0
    19 May 2021 15: 59
    Old and new photo. Pay attention to the numbers)). The wooden box that is on the deck, stands next to it on the ground
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.