M982 Excalibur Projectile: Creation History and Development Opportunities

43
Extensive use of high precision weapons (WTO) was the key to victory in the military conflicts of the last decades, and its intensive development is the general line of development of the means of warfare in the leading states of the world.

Moreover, if earlier the WTO used mainly aviation, recently, considerable efforts have been made to create high-precision field artillery ammunition for firing from closed positions.

From the start of development to production

Nowadays in this sphere it was possible to achieve serious success. In particular, during the hostilities in Iraq and Afghanistan, Americans often fire guided missiles from the MLRS MLRS. In the development of the 155-mm M982 "Excalibur" (Excalibur - the name of King Arthur's legendary sword), there is also a definite breakthrough, and it began in the 90-e.

Then the Pentagon leadership decided to improve the accuracy of 155-mm cluster artillery shells (CAS) with cumulative fragmentation combat elements (KOBE) using space-based radionavigation system (CRNS) "Navstar" combat vehicles for various purposes. At that time, the program received the name ERDPICT (Enhanced-Rang Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munition). In 1996, the person responsible for its implementation is assigned to the project manager for the creation of a CAS with combat elements of precise aiming (BETP) SADARM (Sense And Destroy ARMor).

At the beginning of 1997, new requirements for a CAS with KOBE were formulated: the maximum range of a projectile with a bottom gas generator or a cruise engine must be at least 45 kilometers, ammunition must be equipped with 72 KOBE M42 / M46 or 85 KOBE HM80.

In January, 1998 was signed a contract for development work on the CAS HM982 topic. It was assumed that the planned projectile distance can be overcome due to the planned flight, which will allow a special aerodynamic shape and four-section tail of the ammunition.

In addition to the CAS with KOBE, the development of the CAS with the BAD SADARM (XM982 Block II) and the high-explosive fragmentation projectile (OFS) of concrete action (XM982 Block III) was proposed. The terms of the contract provided for the release in 2001 of a small batch of shells of all three types.

Meanwhile, in the Pentagon’s 2001, it is concluded that the US Army does not primarily need cluster munitions, but concrete-type OFS with the Increment 1 index. The CAS with BETP is still considered as the second variant of the projectile with the Increment 2 index. The third option is becoming an ammunition with a homing head with an index of Increment 3. Thus, the construction of a CAS with KOBE was discontinued, and the main task of the developers was to create a means for defeating structures, including fortified command posts.

It is possible that the abandonment of CAS with KOBE was caused by a significant drawback - a significant proportion of unexploded elements after their fall on the ground: with a firing range of up to 10 kilometers - two percent, over 10 - more than three percent. The hull ХМ982 was supposed to be equipped no longer with an American four-section tail, but with an eight-section Swedish, designed for a TCM projectile (Trajectory Correction Munition), and a bottom gas generator.

In the 2003 year, due to repeated technical problems, the US Department of Defense made a decision on the phased development of ammunition. Creating its first version included two stages - 1 and 1b. During the first sub-stage, the projectile was constructed in two versions - 1-1 and 1-2. The 1-1 version was simplified so much that it allowed us to produce and deliver ammunition to the troops as quickly as possible. Requirements for different XM982 1a options in 2003 year are presented in the 1 table. Particular attention was paid to reducing the cost of the projectile.

M982 Excalibur Projectile: Creation History and Development Opportunities

Table 1


For the second version of the ammunition, due to the termination of the SADARM program in 2001, their foreign counterparts were considered as combat elements of precise aiming. The development of the third version of the projectile, starting with 2005, is funded separately. Thus, the main focus of the program was on creating the XM982 Increment 1 controlled concrete-drilling projectile.

In June, 2005-th signed a contract for the production of 140 shells ХМ982 1-1 (the cost of each - 144 thousands of dollars) for delivery in March next year. However, due to the detected failures during the tests, the first ammunition began to arrive only in September, and the shooting was possible only at the start of the 2007. In the same year it was planned to purchase two batches of HM982 1-1: 321 projectile - at a price of 153 thousands of dollars and 224 projectile - at a price of 120 thousands of dollars per unit, respectively.

Combat use and prospects

In April, 2007 th north of Baghdad HM982 1-1 fired at a real enemy for the first time. In May-August in Iraq, the Americans spent several more such shells. Their deviation from the target did not exceed four meters. But in Afghanistan, the ammunition did not show the expected high efficiency, as a result of which the total production of the 1 projectile was not 30 thousands, but 6264 units.

The first batch of XMUMNUMX 982-1 variants in the number of 2 units were produced in 362, and 2008 - in 458-m. In October, the 2009 of the 2010a-1 projectile was assigned the M2 index and a full-scale production of ammunition was planned for 982.

In September 2008, the Pentagon signed a contract to perform OCD to create the Increment 1b Excalibur option. The main requirement for developers was to reduce the cost of the projectile. It should have the following characteristics: circular probable deviation (CEP) - no more than 10 meters when used without CRNS interference, 30 meters - under interference conditions, maximum firing range - 35 – 40 kilometers, minimum - 3 – 8, reliability - no less 0,9, guaranteed penetration of concrete 10 – 20 thick centimeters.

As you can see, the requirements for the projectile in terms of firing range and reliability after 12 years of development have not only not tightened, but have noticeably softened. The achieved parameters for the 1 variant and the requirements for the 1b variant in the 2008 year are listed in the 2 table.


Table 2


Preliminary tests of the 1b variant are planned for the third quarter of 2012, and the completion of the development is scheduled for the 2014 year. According to the plans of the creators of the munition, it should be supplied with a bottom gas generator, thanks to the introduction of new technical solutions, it will be less expensive. Two versions of the 1b projectile are offered: the first (Saber) with a main engine, its flight range will reach 48 kilometers, the second with a new tail unit made of titanium, the bottom gas generator (1 version) capable of hitting the target at a distance of 45 kilometers.

The principal differences in the construction of the versions of the 1 projectile and 1b are as follows. The tail part of the 1 version rotates relative to the body and is closed with a lid when fired. In the variant 1b, the bottom part of the projectile is fixed, protective coatings for the tail unit are not provided. The data for the 1 projectile motion control system are entered before firing into the read-only memory. For 1b, an external reprogramming device is supposed to be used, which makes it possible to change the nature of the impact of the munition on the target during its flight. The M982 projectile software with the Increment 3 index should autonomously determine the optimal aiming points, flight path and method of detonation. It is possible that the 1b variant will have the following types of equipment: smoke, thermobaric, lighting and non-lethal actions. It is planned to use a laser seeker and to realize the possibility of striking the target at a specified time.

The development of the M982 has proven to be more costly and time consuming than expected. In the production of 30 thousand shells it was expected that the price of each of them would be at the level of 75 thousand dollars, taking into account the cost of research and development. In fact, it was twice as much. Work continues and, consequently, financial costs and the cost of ammunition increase, which may lead at least to a reduction in the number of products purchased.

During the combat use of Excalibur, a number of flaws were revealed. The accuracy of the projectile hit depends on the stability of communication at the same time with at least three spacecraft. A negative point is also the obligatory presence of special equipment in the equipment of the howitzer for preparing ammunition for a shot, since it differs significantly from similar actions when firing with standard shells.

Despite the fact that the M982 is officially adopted for service, its entry into the troops and mass use in battles can be expected no earlier than 2014 – 2015. It is important to note that the development of only the first version of the projectile, which satisfies the minimum requirements, has been completed. It is possible that the ammunition with the index 1b, which meets all the requirements of the customer, will appear only in the 2015 year.

In conclusion, it should be noted that the creators of the 155-mm high-precision projectile M982 faced serious scientific and technical problems, which greatly delayed the creation of a new ammunition and increased its price. It is now equal to the cost 120 – 150 of conventional OFS. Probably, "Excalibur" can be cheaper, but not so much as to oust the latter from the ammunition of field artillery guns.

The “biting” price of precision projectiles means that they will be used in decisive areas and for the destruction of certain important targets (command posts, infrastructure facilities), as well as in conditions where it is necessary to avoid continuous destruction and death of persons not involved in an armed conflict.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    27 August 2012 08: 22
    There is something similar with us ... like Krasnoplya, but it’s different there:

    A calculation of three people illuminates the target with the help of a laser target designator, a range finder, which is part of the Malachite portable fire control system. Small-sized targets such as a tank can be illuminated at a distance of up to 5-7 kilometers during the day and 4 km at night, larger targets - up to 15 km. Then, a guided artillery shell is fired from a remote position.


    and in general, our arsenals are clogged with conventional ammunition for the most 3 world,
  2. damba
    0
    27 August 2012 09: 09
    It is clear that such supplies are needed purely for preventive operations somewhere in the savannah, for a real war there will be ordinary shells since on some Excalibur the USA can become bankrupt 2-3 times again
    1. +1
      27 August 2012 13: 05
      How to say it. It depends on what you mean by "real war"
  3. Prohor
    +2
    27 August 2012 09: 49
    I like the wording: "its entry into the troops and mass use in battles can be expected no earlier than 2014-2015".
    That is, the constant US war against everyone no longer surprises anyone, somehow they got into the uniform of the world gendarme ...
    As for the projectile, it’s rather complicated, in my opinion, one connection with three spacecraft is worth something! 150 ordinary OFS (the price of one "Excalibur") is more effective in any way.
    1. +1
      27 August 2012 13: 06
      Why be surprised? All strong countries howl on an ongoing basis. The USSR fought, actively sending military advisers and entering into conflicts, the Great Britain fought, etc.
  4. Dimon Lviv
    +1
    27 August 2012 09: 54
    The accuracy of a projectile hit depends on the stability of communication with at least three spacecraft at the same time.
    - And what will this accuracy be when all American satellites over the desired area are destroyed?
    1. Windbreak
      0
      27 August 2012 10: 17
      What is it that the satellites will be destroyed in such high orbits (20200 km)? So far, only low-orbit satellites can destroy anti-satellite weapons
      1. +2
        27 August 2012 10: 33
        On duty as a koment to similar topics: How !!! You have not heard about the electromagnetic pulse ?!
    2. vitya29111973
      0
      20 February 2013 18: 08
      Perhaps slingshots are far from hidden? laughing
  5. 0
    27 August 2012 10: 36
    Long live the nuclear explosion in space !!! Hurray, comrades !!!
    1. Prohor
      0
      27 August 2012 13: 04
      And do not need a nuclear explosion in space.
      An explosion in the ionosphere of a cumulative ammunition with beryllium, it seems, the lining of the funnel causes a strong aurora, paralyzing any interaction with satellites.
      This, incidentally, was the "asymmetric response" to the Star Wars program.
      Although this is not for the Papuans, of course ....
      1. Old skeptic
        -1
        27 August 2012 14: 19
        Everything is much simpler, an explosive magnetic pulse generator is placed in a conventional shell and does not cost much more, but has a double effect:
        1. Powerful local electromagnetic pulse.
        2. A decent high-explosive action.
        1. 0
          27 August 2012 14: 59
          That is why all this is riveted in bundles
  6. borisst64
    +2
    27 August 2012 11: 00
    Regarding the high cost, the metal consumption for shells in the Second World War is several times higher than the consumption for tanks, artillery, ships and other weapons combined.
  7. 0
    27 August 2012 11: 04
    The accuracy of the defeat is of course inferior to projectiles with GOS from laser illumination, not to mention the targets moving at different speeds, but still I would like to know about possible measures to counter this projectile. Is it possible to use electronic warfare, signal suppression and at what distances?
    1. +2
      27 August 2012 12: 10
      Yes suppression is possible, but it’s not for popuars
    2. 0
      27 August 2012 13: 07
      EW tools often do not distinguish between friends and foes. Laser light is easier to detect
      1. DIMS
        0
        27 August 2012 14: 43
        Who told you? The goal is not highlighted all the time.
        1. 0
          27 August 2012 15: 02
          No, but modern tools allow you to quickly detect the backlight point
          1. DIMS
            0
            27 August 2012 15: 07
            That's just to detect and have time.
            1. 0
              27 August 2012 21: 22
              Yes, how to say. Manages to knock out and, as a rule. The goal is not always the same, and there are remedies.
              1. DIMS
                0
                27 August 2012 21: 48
                Yeah, and also drink a liter and hopak dance. You did not forget that such shells arrive almost from above - one of the features of howitzers? Well, with speeds incomparable with the speeds of ATGMs and RPGs
                1. 0
                  27 August 2012 21: 51
                  The article points to the trajectory providing planning ... this implies a gentle ....
                  1. DIMS
                    0
                    27 August 2012 22: 00
                    I’m talking about the Russian line of managed and adjusted.
                2. 0
                  28 August 2012 18: 27
                  I have not forgotten. AND? What specifically see the problem here?
      2. 0
        27 August 2012 19: 26
        no doubt the question is what is the importance of the goal. For example, the data channels can also be launched by wire
  8. 0
    27 August 2012 11: 22
    The article is definitely a plus ... but as for the shells ... 6 meters for hitting the bunker ... it's a bit much ... the good thing is that laser lighting is not required ... that is, the human factor is excluded ... I don’t know ... maybe of course I'm wrong ... but it looks like a child prodigy ...
    1. 0
      27 August 2012 12: 11
      And we must not forget that the power of this projectile is an order of magnitude lower than that of a conventional OFS.
      1. Prohor
        +2
        27 August 2012 13: 18
        Total: the price of 150 OFS and the power of 0,5 OFS give a ratio of 1/300!
        This is a fifteen-fold volley of artillery battalion !!! laughing
        Please tell me - why is it needed at all? request
        1. 0
          27 August 2012 13: 56
          Well, only if you destroy what shack nito. No more Dota picking no
          There is no infantry from the trenches either.
          At a current range, but again it’s already MLRS there and there are more guarantees of defeat
          1. DIMS
            0
            27 August 2012 14: 41
            And you count. High-explosive fragmentation, uncontrollable, dispersion (only it) at a range of 1.2% That is, at 60 km it will be 720 meters. What does it mean? That 99,98% of the shells will fall into an ellipse, the major axis of which will be 4 meters. And at the same time you will have to absolutely accurately determine the settings for shooting, which is basically impossible.
            1. 0
              27 August 2012 15: 57
              DIMS
              All is well.
              BUT there are a couple of points.
              1 What do you want to destroy with this shell? Something important? And not dug. I note that the escalibur also has a KVO, but given the weakened power? And if the target is covered by GPS jammers?
              2 You pointed out the ellipse more or less correctly, but there’s a nuance why work at such a range with barrel artillery if there is an MLRS and their share in the troops is not small. And taking into account the form factors of the MLRS, the accuracy there can be higher and the power is not so weakened.
              3 Inability to use against moving targets.
              1. DIMS
                0
                27 August 2012 16: 24
                What do you want to destroy with this shell? Something important? And not dug. I note that the escalibur also has a KVO, but given the weakened power? And if the target is covered by GPS jammers?

                Why not dug? According to the religious ban on delayed fuse installation?
                And how weakened this power? Maybe it's just longer than a conventional shell, like, for example, our "Krasnopolye"?
                He has a CVO, but it is an order of magnitude smaller than just the dispersion of conventional shells.
                Working jammers are generally a gift for radio intelligence. You can also fireworks to launch, so they certainly found. In addition, even with them its accuracy will be higher than that of a conventional projectile.

                You indicated the ellipse more or less correctly, but there’s a nuance why work at such a range with barreled artillery if there are MLRS and their share in the troops is not small. And taking into account the form factors of the MLRS, the accuracy there can be higher and the power is not so weakened.

                But because the MLRS dispersion is even higher. And in general, I will see how you will hit with their help targets located close to your troops.

                Inability to use against moving targets.

                The only problem. But the troops also have ATGMs that make moving targets much easier to hit than with MLRS or barreled artillery fire.
                1. 0
                  27 August 2012 19: 36
                  Working jammers are generally a gift for radio intelligence.
                  Oh oh And if you do not take popuasiya and for example a full-fledged team?
                  But because the MLRS dispersion is even higher.
                  Eito if you take ordinary shells. And the main increase in value falls precisely on the guidance system. As a result, the same charge of the Tornado-G 23kg and the escalibur 9, the difference, as it were, is considerable. With this, it costs 85 kilobax (55 in a large series) with a CVO with interference of 30 meters. which, as it were, does not guarantee the defeat of the target with a single shot. and it won’t.

                  Threat Want to spend 85kilobaksov for the shell of the flag in their hands and a barrel on the neck.
                  1. DIMS
                    +1
                    27 August 2012 20: 04
                    Oh oh And if you do not take popuasiya and for example a full-fledged team?

                    Well, they’ll definitely pull the radio intelligence. Especially in Papuan.

                    Eito if you take ordinary shells. And the main increase in value falls precisely on the guidance system. As a result, the same charge of the Tornado-G 23kg and the escalibur 9, the difference, as it were, is considerable.

                    Do not confuse different things. MLRS for this purpose are designed to hit the area, and not for a separate purpose

                    which, as it were, does not guarantee the defeat of the target with a single shot. and it won’t.

                    None of the precision weapons gives a guarantee. In addition, improving the accuracy of firing of MLRS and conventional artillery shell artillery shells also costs a lot of money.
        2. Passing
          0
          27 August 2012 14: 22
          Well, for example, it is not always permissible to flatten an entire city block with three hundred shells, sometimes you need to put a shell in strictly in one building.
          1. Prohor
            0
            27 August 2012 14: 28
            For whom is this unacceptable? For the Americans, who razed the ground two huge Japanese cities without any need for that?
            Alas, for this ugly world hegemon the word "can not" does not exist ....
            1. DIMS
              0
              27 August 2012 14: 44
              The Americans in these cities did not have troops.
            2. vitya29111973
              0
              20 February 2013 18: 22
              after the battles for Okinawa, the Americans, unlike us, knew almost all of their losses, figured out that to take the Japanese Islands they simply would not have enough male population. So there was a need, and its price is half the population of the USA !!!
          2. 0
            27 August 2012 15: 58
            And how do you accurately calculate the coordinates of this particular building?
            Or do you think the building will fall from one OFS?
            1. DIMS
              0
              27 August 2012 16: 26
              Actually, artillery has been dealing with this since the First World War — determining the coordinates of a target.
              1. 0
                27 August 2012 19: 38
                I’m talking about that.
                It is either everywhere to carry the spotter or to measure with instruments. Or, by intelligence, calculate the target coordinates in advance and enter them into the database.
                Here the question is what if the same building is easier to illuminate with a laser.
                1. DIMS
                  0
                  27 August 2012 19: 56
                  Not easier. In this case, laser illumination devices are coupled with the firing gun. In order not to highlight the target constantly, see above. "Excalibur" is more universal in this respect. For me, both are so necessary.
                  1. 77bor1973
                    0
                    28 August 2012 23: 08
                    As far as I know, the target is highlighted in just a matter of seconds ...
  9. ADGH122
    0
    19 September 2012 10: 13
    I know that this shell was made for the Ventecora self-propelled gun, this is a self-propelled gun without a crew, it is fully automatic