Combat aircraft. Conditionally heavy, conditionally fighters

29

We have already raised the topic of twin-engine fighters more than once, today there are a couple more under consideration. It cannot be called sweet in any way, but these planes took to the skies of World War II, and accordingly, they have the right to be here.

History began somewhere in the mid-thirties, when in many countries the military actually had such a heavy fighter in their heads that would accompany bombers and ...



But for "and ..." in fact, nothing turned out, the idea was good, but in fact, few decent twin-engine fighters were created. We already wrote about this, so today, in fact, about French aircraft.

The technical assignment for the creation of a twin-engine fighter in France was a proposal to develop a kind of multipurpose defensive aircraft with a crew of two or three people.

The two-seater plane was supposed to be used as a day fighter, attack aircraft, reconnaissance aircraft, and bombers escort fighter. A standard set, let's say.


The idea with a crew of three was a breakthrough: it was supposed to be the leader of the fighters, in which the third member of the crew would act as a controller-gunner, that is, would be the "eyes" of a group of fighters. To add to the complete set of the radar - and here's what we have today with the MiG-31.

The idea was good, but the execution failed a little.

According to the terms of reference, the aircraft was supposed to reach a maximum speed of 450 km / h at an altitude of 4000 m, gain this altitude in 15 minutes, have a cruising speed of 320 km / h and a flight duration of over 4 hours. Quite normal numbers for both escort and patrol of the area.

Combat aircraft. Conditionally heavy, conditionally fighters

For a heavy fighter - appropriate weapons. Here the French have clearly blundered, since two 20-mm cannons from the "Hispano-Suiza" and one 7,5-mm machine gun to protect the rear hemisphere is definitely not enough.

But there was a problem - a problem ... of the engines! As strange as it may sound, but yes, the French, the pioneers aviation, there were no normal motors for such an aircraft! The terms of reference were very tight in terms of weight (normal for a fighter), which led to the fact that for a heavy fighter the weight was limited to three tons, which means that only a few engines were suitable.

More precisely, four. But the liquid-cooled engines from Renault and Salmson were frankly weak, 450 hp each, so with all the wealth of choice, only the Gnome-Ron GR14Mars and Hispano-Suiza 14Ab remained, two-row 600-liter stars .from.

Firm "Pote" offered two aircraft at once - R.630 and R.631, differing initially only in engines. On the P.630 it was planned to install the "Hispano-Suizu" HS 14H, on the P.631 - "Gnome-Ron" GR14M.

The first was made with the R.630-01 engine "Hispano-Suiza". During the tests, the HS 14Hbs motors were replaced first with HS 14Ab 02/03, and then with HS 14Ab 10/11. The third time, as they say, was right, God, apparently, loves the trinity even in France. The HS 14Ab 10/11 developed 640 hp. near the ground and 725 hp. at an altitude of 4000 meters. With a takeoff weight of 3850 kg, the aircraft reached a speed of 460 km / h at an altitude of 5000 meters. The plane could fly 1300 km at a cruising speed of 300 km / h.

In general, for 1936 - very decent performance.


The armament consisted of two 20-mm HS.9 cannons in the nose with 60 rounds of ammunition and a MAC 1934 machine gun in the rear cockpit with 1000 rounds of ammunition.

Weak, although the same Bf 109E originally had 20 rounds of ammunition for its guns.

In January 1937, the Pote enterprises were nationalized and became part of the state structure SNCAN. And in June, the first orders for aircraft were received. First, a series of 10 two-seat fighters and 30 three-seat fighters, and then another 80 two-seat aircraft.


The aircraft generated interest outside of France as well. China, Yugoslavia, Switzerland bought P.630 aircraft for testing, and Czechoslovakia acquired a license to build the P.636 modification at its AVIA factories. True, the money was wasted, since Czechoslovakia soon ended, without having time to build a single aircraft.

The first serial R.630 took off in February 1938. At the official acceptance tests the aircraft showed a speed of 448 km / h at an altitude of 4000 m, the climb to this altitude took 7 minutes. It is clear that the data of the serial copy differed from the data shown in the factory tests, but all the same, the deviations were within acceptable limits.


At the same time, problems began with the Hispano-Suiza engines. The problems were so serious that it was decided to remove the P.630 from the combat units and convert them into dual-control training aircraft. The P.631 was supposed to compensate for this process, the production of which was increased.

In general, the supply program was constantly under the threat of disruption in terms of engines, weapons, and propellers. The first batch of P.630 was generally armed with four 7,5 mm machine guns instead of cannons.

Nevertheless, the fighters went to the Air Force. Especially three-seater, designed to be the leaders of conventional fighters. According to the plan, it was supposed to have one flight of six leaders per fighter squadron. The leaders were supposed to provide navigational assistance and from them they were going to command an air battle. That is, the "Pote" were supposed to replace the Blokh MV.200 bombers that were performing the role of an air command post, which by that time simply could not keep up with the fighters.

You can justifiably make a curtsey to the French designers. The aircraft turned out to be very technological and easy to manufacture. The release of one P.630 required 7500 man-hours. For a twin-engine aircraft, it is minuscule, considering that the Dewoatin D.520 took 7300 man-hours, and the Moran-Saulnier MS.406 - 12 200 man-hours.

Before the declaration of war on Germany, the French Air Force had 85 P.630 units and 206 P.631 units. Not so much, but not too little.


When the war began, it was mainly the patrol functions that were entrusted to "Pote". The scouts were supposed to patrol the front sectors in the daytime and, if the enemy appeared, to direct fighters at him.

In fact, the R.631 and R.630 were replacing modern radar patrol aircraft, since they really could "hang" in a given area for quite a long time.

However, no one said better than Antoine de Saint-Exupery about how the reconnaissance squadrons acted. Therefore, his diary book "Military Pilot" is something that is worth reading in any case.

Sometimes the Pote attacked German planes and even shot down a number. But not critical.

In general, the service of twin-engine reconnaissance aircraft and fighters did not work out. And the point here is not in any particular backwardness of the P.630, but in the general mess that reigned in the French army. The fact is that the P.630 and P.631 were in fact very similar to the Bf.110C, and therefore everyone fired at them: French troops, British troops, French fighters, British fighters ... That's all.

In this regard, all planes had to be decorated with a wide white stripe running along the side to the left and right of the national circles. The circles themselves were increased in size and outlined with a large edging. And all the same, fire from their own became quite commonplace for the Pote pilots.


LTH Potez 630:

Wingspan, m: 16,00.
Length, m: 11,07.
Height, m: 3,61.
Wing area m: 32,70.

Weight, kg:
- empty aircraft: 2 450;
- normal takeoff: 3 850.

Engine: 2 x Hispano-Suiza 14Ab 10/11 x 720 HP
Maximum speed, km / h: 448.
Cruising speed, km / h: 412.
Practical range, km: 1.
Maximum rate of climb, m / min: 620.
Practical ceiling, m: 10 000.

Crew, person: 2.

Armament: two front 7,5 mm MAC.34 machine guns and one of the same machine gun on the turret in the rear cockpit

Served "Pote" in the night fighter and naval aviation. Four squadrons of "night lights" covered Paris, and one squadron - Lyon and weapons factories "Creusot".


Night fighter aircraft also underwent changes. In accordance with pre-war plans, on October 16, 1939, a squadron of ECN2 / 562 night fighters with a staff of 12 Р.631 CN2s was formed in Lyon. The recruitment of this unit was completed by January 29, 1940. On that day, the squadron's name was changed to ECN5 / 13. This was due to the fact that the GCNI / 13 and P / 13 groups were divided into four separate squadrons (ECM1 / 13,2 / 13,3 / 13, 4/13). They were all stationed in the Paris area, and ECN5 / 13 was tasked with covering Lyon and the Creusot arms factories.

The war showed that, as day fighters, the "Pote" were very so-so. Not only were the speed and rate of climb low, but the armament also left much to be desired.

Yes, for the P.630 twin-engine aircraft, in terms of maneuverability, they were simply excellent. This is true. But the main fighter of the Luftwaffe "Messerschmitt" Bf 109E did everything he wanted with the French "heavy" fighter.

"Pote" could well operate successfully against bombers, scouts and so on, but often there was not enough firepower for this. A lot of aircraft were armed beyond any criticism, since no consensus was reached with the management of "Hispano-Suiza" in connection with the nationalization of the factories.


Therefore, the R.630, armed with two or four 7,5 mm machine guns, were not uncommon. Some machines only had one cannon. In general, there were problems with the Hispano-Suiza's cannons right up to the very end of France.

Realizing that the armament was really weak, the French military department made attempts to strengthen it, settling on the final version of two 20-mm cannons and four 7,5-mm machine guns. And to this standard it was decided to modify all the already produced twin-engine "Pote". However, in fact, only two cars were altered.

By May 10, 1940, when the Germans launched an offensive, only P.631 were used at the front. But only naval pilots from flotilla F1C. This formation fought for 12 days, from May 10 to May 21, 1940. During these 12 days, naval pilots shot down 12 German aircraft and lost eight of their own. And this was a real achievement, as the remaining six squadrons (18 aircraft each) shot down 17 German aircraft.

As a night fighter, the P.631 CN2 was almost as effective as its daytime counterpart. Since the French simply did not have the equipment for detecting enemy aircraft, it is not surprising that the night fighters did not perform a single successful interception.

As a result, a masterpiece decision was made: to use night fighters as daytime attack aircraft. 24 night fighters attempted to strike at the advancing Germans on 17 May. The results of the attacks on the Germans are unknown, and the French lost 6 out of 24 vehicles.

When the French government capitulated to the Germans, 32 R.630 and 112 R.631 remained in the unoccupied zone. But in 1942 they still went to the Germans. There was no profit in this, since less than a third of the total number could be recognized as serviceable and ready for military service.


Another squadron P.631 (ECN 3/13), based in North Africa, ended up on the side of the part of the French army that fought on the same side with the allies. So until the end of 1942, the squadron on "night" aircraft was engaged in covering the city of Gabes from German bombers.

In general, a very small number of twin-engine "Pote" out of 1200 survived the war. They were used as training for a very short time, but were mostly decommissioned in 1946.


LTH Potez 631:

Wingspan, m: 16,00.
Length, m: 11,07.
Height, m: 3,61.
Wing area m: 32,70.

Weight, kg:
- empty aircraft: 2 450;
- normal takeoff: 3 760.

Engine: 2 x Gnome Rhone GR14Mars x 660 HP

Maximum speed km / h:
- at height: 442;
- at sea level: 360.
Cruising speed, km / h: 240.
Practical range, km: 1.
Maximum rate of climb, m / min: 710.
Practical ceiling, m: 9 500.

Crew, person: 2.

Armament:
- two 20-mm cannons Hispano-Suiza HS 9 or HS 404 with 60 + 30 rounds of ammunition per barrel (some vehicles had one machine gun and one cannon);
- one rear 7,5-mm MAC 1934 machine gun (1000 rounds).

On some machines, 4 additional 7,5-mm machine guns were installed in under-dust fairings.


In general, as a result, we can say the following: the idea was quite good, especially with regard to the control plane. However, the plane was not lucky: there was nothing for it: engines, guns, tasks. Therefore, R.630 and R.631 found themselves in a strange situation of searching for an application.

And since everything was very sad in terms of organization in the French army and air force, the Potet was not destined to become another Lightning, alas. Although there was some potential for this.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    30 July 2020 18: 08
    Opportunities do not always coincide with desires. Thanks for the material hi
  2. Eug
    -1
    30 July 2020 18: 46
    It is strange that Poteza was confused with the Bf-110. The French have air-cooled engines, the Germans have water-cooled engines, and they are located on the wing in different ways.
    1. +14
      30 July 2020 19: 21
      Quote: Eug
      It is strange that Poteza was confused with the Bf-110. The French have air-cooled engines, the Germans have water-cooled engines, and they are located on the wing in different ways.

      "I look at Dutertra, my fortune-teller navigator. Yesterday he argued with a colonel from the division:" But how can I pinpoint your positions if I fly ten meters from the ground at a speed of five hundred and thirty kilometers per hour? " - "Excuse me, but you will see where they will start hitting you! Once they are hitting, then the positions are German."

      “Well, I laughed after that,” concluded Dutertre.

      The fact is that the French soldiers did not see French aircraft in the eyes. There are only a thousand of them, and they are scattered from Dunkirk to Alsace. Rather, they are dissolved in infinity. Therefore, when a plane flies over the front, it is probably German. And they try to shoot him down before he has time to drop the bombs. Hearing a rumble in the sky, machine guns and rapid-fire cannons immediately open fire.

      - Frankly speaking, they receive valuable information with this method! .. - added Dutertre. "


      (c) "Military pilot" Antoine de Saint-Exupery
      1. 0
        31 July 2020 05: 12
        Quote: Spade
        There are only a thousand of them, and they are scattered from Dunkirk to Alsace. Rather, they are dissolved in infinity.

        It is immediately clear that French infinity is significantly inferior to Russian.
    2. Alf
      +8
      30 July 2020 20: 08
      Quote: Eug
      It is strange that Poteza was confused with the Bf-110. The French have air-cooled engines, the Germans have water-cooled engines, and they are located on the wing in different ways.

      Look from 500 meters, but from different angles.
  3. +1
    30 July 2020 19: 11
    Thanks for a good article, an interesting airplane.
    1. +1
      30 July 2020 20: 21
      I agree, but the volume is too high. The plane doesn't deserve it. It was possible to devote an essay to the main combat aircraft of France, which fought (with all) during the WWII.
      1. +2
        30 July 2020 21: 10
        Skomorokhov just has an inexplicable and strange love for the French aviation of the WWII
        1. +2
          30 July 2020 21: 47
          "Monsieur knows a lot about perversions" (c)
    2. -5
      31 July 2020 01: 33
      "article" ... what a "heavy fighter" - according to the data - a bomber and not "light" ... seuss - ask any specialist - about ANYTHING ... never ... even to tell laziness ... Spartak - deserves more attention ... a team of corrupt losers ...
      1. Alf
        +1
        31 July 2020 18: 16
        Quote: sg7s
        seuss - ask any specialist - NOTHING ... never ... even too lazy to tell ... Spartak deserves more attention ... a team of corrupt losers ...

        What are you talking about?
        1. -6
          31 July 2020 22: 10
          Listen. now such a girl was brought ... What fighters, what Spartak ?? five hours as a minute ...
          1. Alf
            +4
            31 July 2020 22: 14
            Quote: sg7s
            Listen. now such a girl was brought ... What fighters, what Spartak ?? five hours as a minute ...

            fool
  4. +6
    30 July 2020 19: 45
    It is difficult to become lightning with such engines, it was not for nothing that the Pawn became a bomber, although it had more powerful motors and the Pe-3 was produced in scanty quantities.
    1. Alf
      +1
      30 July 2020 22: 30
      Quote: MooH
      It is difficult to become lightning with such engines, it was not for nothing that the Pawn became a bomber, although it had more powerful motors and the Pe-3 was produced in scanty quantities.

      Where is it more powerful? On the PE-2 there were M-105, 1250 horses each, and on the 38th - 1475. The difference was 500 mares.
      1. +5
        30 July 2020 23: 49
        I meant more powerful motors than the Pote. He has only 660. But 1250 and 1475 are almost 20%, which is quite a lot for this class.
        1. Alf
          +1
          31 July 2020 18: 15
          Quote: MooH
          I meant more powerful motors than the Pote.

          I beg your pardon, I understand that you are comparing the PE-2 and the P-38.
      2. 0
        1 August 2020 11: 44
        If at the ground the plane with the M-82 was only 7 km (458 km / h versus 451 km / h) ahead of the car with the M-105PF, released in February 1943, then already at medium altitudes the advantage increased significantly. Here the new version of the Pe-2 overtook not only domestic aircraft with water-cooled engines, but also the American Douglas "Boston" III (A-20C), which at that time was one of the fastest serial medium bombers in the world. The Pe-2 with the M-82 at an altitude of 6200 m developed a speed of 547 km / h, while the Boston III - 530 km / h at 4500 m. The new car also significantly surpassed the Boston III in climb rate and ceiling. For a combat turn, it was possible to reach 800 m instead of the previous 450-500 m. The high thrust of the engines sharply reduced the takeoff - from 620 m for a serial aircraft from the M-105RA to 490 m (when crossing the M-82). The longitudinal and directional stability of the aircraft has somewhat improved. The new version flew freely on one motor.
    2. +2
      31 July 2020 14: 21
      It is difficult to become lightning with such engines, it is not for nothing that the Pawn became a bomber,


      Any WWII twin-engine aircraft was a bad front-line fighter. Lightning is no exception. The calculation was that the power of the two motors would fall on the smaller weight glider. But there is a law of squares and cubes. The wing loading must be kept by increasing the wing area. And away we go - tail area, fuselage shoulder, chassis weight. The dimensions led to a decrease in strength, and the time of maneuvers increased.
      Until it became necessary to carry a locator, an operator. Here, yes - one engine is no longer enough. Well, or exotic, such as carrying a tank of fuel to accompany a long-range bomber
      And optimal for two (even 4) guns - 1300 -1700 horses are enough.
      Even two to 500 is worse in terms of mass return than 1 to 1000.
      1. 0
        7 August 2020 17: 24
        Quote: dauria
        Any WWII twin-engine aircraft was a bad front-line fighter. Lightning is no exception.

        An extremely controversial statement - both in Europe and in the Pacific, the Lightnings have fully proved themselves as fighters, having learned how to deal even with super-maneuverable Zeros.

        But a series of aerial duels over France in 1940 showed that the French Potezes were much inferior to the German Destroyers of the same class.
  5. +4
    30 July 2020 20: 19
    If there were no weight restrictions, motors with a capacity of 2250 hp could be used, several types of which were installed on Leo-451 bombers and its versions, such as Leo-454, Leo-455 and the like. Then something could have happened, because the propellers on the French twin-engine machines rotated in different directions, which greatly facilitated piloting.
  6. 0
    30 July 2020 22: 49
    By the way, the idea came to me: for some reason, the most powerful piston fighters are single-engine, and jet fighters are two-engine.
    1. -2
      30 July 2020 23: 51
      they did not pick up initially reactive ... KS - 400 kelvin, knd - degrees 1-5 2 increase in pressure and so on ... BUT SPEED - the same 15th (instant, not lavochkin) - I even made sabers, I didn’t say how many even, something more than 1000 (the 86 had 6 machine guns, ours had an RD-45F engine with a thrust of 4500 pounds, a copy of the British turbojet engine "Nin". The armament consisted of two 23 mm cannons and one 37 mm ... volley made of sabers - a bunch of scrap, they said that at the first meeting (when Kozhedub lifted ALL, (left one pair on duty). risking, in the sky of American parachutes it was like when landing) ... Something 30-ku "fortresses ( 29th) and a dozen 86 A-5s "lowered ... Well, think about it - a volley of three cannons, there the tank will not survive ...
    2. 0
      17 August 2020 10: 52
      And how to measure the "power" of a fighter? ;) If in the mass of a second salvo, then the leader will most likely be the twin-engine 6 (!) - He-219 cannon night fighter with an indicator of about 15 kg / s
  7. +2
    31 July 2020 11: 31
    Another rewriting from airwar.ru?
    By golly, it would be better to start there proofreading and organizing the material.
  8. 0
    31 July 2020 13: 23
    Interesting stuff. Thanks for taking the time to dig.
  9. 0
    31 July 2020 18: 30
    Breguet-69 series had much higher performance characteristics with the same engines. But Pate was more familiar with the minavia.
    As for Saint-Exupery, he flew the MB-174. He wouldn’t fly a lot on the hopes
  10. 0
    1 August 2020 17: 42
    I was waiting for an article on all heavy fighters. Roman brushed aside the article about Poteza. Although, of course, all the disadvantages of "Potez" are inherent in almost all heavy fighters. So a short answer is still given. Although a comparative article about the best twin-engined fighters would be much more interesting.
    1. +1
      7 August 2020 17: 28
      Quote: Vladimir Mashkov
      I was waiting for an article on all heavy fighters. Roman brushed aside an article about Poteza. Although, of course, all the disadvantages of "Potez" are inherent in almost all heavy fighters.


      Ay, and so it is clear that the leaders at that time were Bf110 and P-38, and Comrade Skomorokhov simply does not know the basics of the tactics of heavy fighters of the 1940s, so it’s difficult to expect a masterpiece analysis from him, in my opinion. You have correctly noticed that the article is short and, in fact, "unsubscribe".

      French aircraft essentially accomplished what they could, having their own flight characteristics and the system of combat use used. There were no results ...