New AGM-88G AARGM-ER Aircraft Missile for US Navy

31 098 39

First export flight missiles AGM-88G. The mockup is suspended under the left wing, next to the drop tank. Photo by NAVAIR / navair.navy.mil

The US Navy continues to develop new aviation weapons of destruction for carrier-based aircraft. A few days ago, tests began on the promising AGM-88G AARGM-ER anti-radar missile, developed specifically for naval aviation. So far, we are talking only about the first export flights, but in a few years the missile will go into service - and can become a real threat to a potential enemy.

First flight


According to the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), tests of the AGM-88G Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile - Extended Range began on June 1 at the Patuxent River training ground (Maryland). The first carrier of the experimental rocket was the carrier-based fighter F / A-18E from the 23rd test squadron (VX-23).



A plane with a payload in the form of two hanging tanks, a pair of air-to-air missiles and one prototype AGM-88G made a take-off, completed a series of maneuvers and landed. During such a flight, information was collected about the arising loads and the reaction of the rocket to them.

The command highly noted this flight, since it puts an end to the main part of the design work and gives start to flight tests. The information collected will be taken into account in the further development of the rocket, which will soon have to go to full flight tests. Tests and debugging will take the next few years. According to current plans, the AGM-88G will go into production and reach initial operational readiness in 2023.

New modification


The current AGM-88G AARGM-ER missile is another representative of a fairly old family dating back to the AGM-88 HARM. At the same time, it is being developed on the basis of the later AGM-88E AARGM and is most unified with it. In both cases, we are talking about a major restructuring of the original design, which appeared in the eighties.


Rocket AGM-88E, the base for future modifications of the "G". Wikimedia Commons Photos

Recall that the product AGM-88E was developed since 2005 by order of the Italian and US defense ministries. The project was done by Orbital ATK and Northrop Grumman. In 2012-13. two customers received the first batch of serial missiles and began their introduction in the troops. In 2019, another order appeared - Germany acquired the missiles.

In 2016, the U.S. Navy funded the start of work on a new modification of the anti-radar missile. The product AGM-88G AARGM-ER was supposed to repeat the existing AGM-88E as much as possible, but have improved flight performance, primarily range. The preliminary project competition ended with the victory of Orbital ATK. In January 2018, she received an appropriate contract.

The main customer for the AARGM-ER program is the naval forces wishing to rearm deck aircraft. Later, the US Air Force joined the program. They are interested in getting the AGM-88G for their F-35A fighters. However, the leading role remains fleet, and the Air Force actually only participate formally.

Technical features


Despite the high degree of unification with the AGM-88E, the new AGM-88G has a different layout and composition of equipment. The long-range missile is made in a cylindrical case with an increased diameter (290 mm versus 254 mm for its predecessors). On the outer surface there is a pair of side gargrot; of the planes only tail rudders remained. The layout has been slightly revised: the head compartment accommodates the homing head, the warhead is placed behind it, and the engine occupies all other volumes. Around the nozzle apparatus steering machines are arranged.

AARGM-ER retains the AARGM GOS, but instrument placement has been redesigned to accommodate a wider housing. There are satellite and inertial navigation devices, an autopilot, as well as a radar seeker with passive and active modes. Search for a target is carried out by its radio signals; At the end of the flight, active radar is turned on for a more accurate hit. The seeker is protected from interference and maintains operability when the monitored signal is lost.


The main features of the AARGM-ER rocket. Graphics by NAVAIR / navair.navy.mil

On-board equipment is able to exchange data with the carrier, up to the moment it hits the target. In particular, this allows the aircraft to be informed of an imminent successful defeat - or miss.

A new modular warhead has been proposed for the AGM-88G, the exact parameters of which have not yet been named. The customer’s requirements included a multi-mode fuse that provides detonation when directly hit the target or when passing near it.

About half the body length is occupied by a new solid fuel engine. According to open data, it provides an increase in flight speed in comparison with the AGM-88E (maximum speed - 2M) and a twofold increase in range - up to 300 km.

AARGM-ER must be compatible with different media. The Navy plans to use it on F / A-18E / F fighters and on the EA-18G electronic warfare aircraft. Also, the new missile will be included in the ammunition of the land and deck modifications of the F-35 fighter. In this case, it is possible to transport and launch from internal cargo compartments. One aircraft can carry up to 2-4 missiles.

In the recent past, Northrop Grumman displayed a ground-based launcher for the AGM-88E / G as a standard shipping container. As far as we know, such a project has not yet been developed.

Long arm aviation


So far, the AGM-88G is in the early stages of testing, and the emergence of such weapons the troops are expected only in a few years. Apparently, all the necessary work will be completed on time. This is facilitated by the widespread use of finished components that no longer need to be developed.


The prototype AGM-88G in the cargo compartment of the F-35 fighter. Photo Orbital ATK / Northrop Grumman

In the future, along with a promising missile, the Navy and, possibly, the US Air Force will receive some new shock capabilities. The Navy is again waiting for an effective tool that can aim at these radiating targets or independently search for them. Some of the features and advantages of the new missile pose a danger to third countries and may become the reason for the adoption of certain measures.

An important advantage of the AGM-88G is the function of storing the coordinates of the detected target and the operation of the ARGSN in the final flight segment, which increases the probability of a successful solution to a combat mission. The product can also transmit data on the attacked target and on the results of the attack. Thus, the missile is simultaneously a means of destruction and a reconnaissance aircraft. Based on its data, it is possible to clarify the picture of the battlefield and the location of the enemy's emitting objects.

A serious cause for concern should be the new engine, which dramatically improves flight performance. The AGM-88G will be able to fly 300 km, which will allow the launch lines to be moved away from the enemy's positions. As a result, the enemy will have to use longer-range systems to repel the attack in a timely manner. Defense, capable of noticing, attacking and hitting the carrier aircraft in time. Otherwise, anti-aircraft systems will have to deal with a more complex target in the form of a missile.

In general, the promising anti-radar missile AGM-88G AARGM-ER will become a convenient and effective aviation weapon. It combines the best modern developments on radar seeker and engines, which gives an advantageous combination of flight and combat characteristics.

Real threat


The AGM-88G is being developed for the US Navy. Deck-based fighter-bombers and aircraft EW will be able to use it to destroy surface or coastal targets - ship and land radars of various purposes, including those from air defense systems. To protect against such weapons, potential enemies of the United States must take certain measures. In general, they repeat the already known methods of countering anti-radar missiles, but they must be developed taking into account the characteristic features of AARGM-ER.

To effectively combat carrier aircraft and missiles of the AGM-88 family, a well-developed and layered air defense system is needed, capable of detecting targets at distances of hundreds of kilometers and hitting them at distances of at least 200-300 km, and if necessary, “shooting through” at medium or short ranges. For example, Russia has similar systems for the ground forces and the navy. They should be developed and strengthened by the country's air defense as a whole - and then the AGM-88G missile will lose its advantages by the time it begins operation.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    12 June 2020 05: 20
    A serious problem, given the range of 300 kilometers. To know her flight capabilities below the level of the radio horizon, and the possibility of target selection, in the event of loss of contact, information about the main object of destruction. ..
    1. +8
      12 June 2020 07: 19
      Quote: Thrifty
      A serious problem, given the range of 300 kilometers. To know her flight capabilities below the level of the radio horizon, and the possibility of target selection, in the event of loss of contact, information about the main object of destruction. ..

      Add that the carrier of this missile could be the F-35 and the problem for air defense doubles.
      1. + 13
        12 June 2020 08: 53
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Add that the carrier of this missile can be F-35 and the problem for air defense is doubled.

        In fact, everything is much more serious and scary. Only it is not customary to talk about this in the air defense environment. Already in the late 90s, after the Yugoslav and Iraqi military conflicts, most scientists agreed on the onset of a radar crisis. The forces of air attack and air defense turned out to be too unequal. It is not only about the presence of many anti-radar missiles of the AGM type, but also about the fact that the average power density of the simplest aviation active jammer is on average 1 kW / MHz, while the capabilities for protection remain an order of magnitude smaller. And unfortunately, the main reason is in ordinary physics, which is described by the equations of radar and anti-radar. Not only politicians, but also many military men with high epaulets need to understand that in a modern war, the air defense system is far from omnipotent. For example, according to the results of mathematical modeling by the Spektr software package on the Kola Peninsula, 50% of air defense equipment and weapons are destroyed within 20-30 minutes, i.e. comparable to the flight time of the main means of destruction.
        Therefore, it is necessary to switch to new physical principles in air defense systems, such as active-passive correlation-basic methods of target detection. In the meantime, our industry prefers to use outdated active radar, and we will wait "until the thunder breaks out" or "the roast cock bites."
        1. -7
          12 June 2020 12: 40
          Quote: Vita VKO
          In fact, everything is much more serious and worse. Only this is not customary to talk about among air defense personnel.

          Chef, it's all gone! Plaster is removed, the client leaves ....
          Quote: Vita VKO
          It is not only about the presence of many anti-radar missiles of the AGM type, but also about the fact that the average power density of the simplest aircraft aviation active jammer is an average of 1 kW / MHz, while protection capabilities remain an order of magnitude less.

          And how much energy is needed on the plane to close the frequencies, at least up to 10 GHz ???
          Ground defense is always more advantageous than air defense. There is no restriction on energy ....
        2. -2
          12 June 2020 14: 43
          Stupidity is sheer.
        3. 0
          13 June 2020 09: 15
          Quote: Vita VKO
          so we will wait "until the thunder breaks out" or "the roast cock bites."

          As they say, God will not betray, the pig will not eat
        4. -3
          13 June 2020 19: 01
          oh my god, what a bird.. this is all from the area of ​​​​a spherical vacuum and a horse. The echeloned air defense and missile defense is now impenetrable by any air attack means. simply because it consists of very powerful ground radars + airborne radar systems - that is, ELINT and AWACS aircraft + fighter aircraft. Such a complex of detection means will not only see all aircraft, but will also see all launched attack weapons, jammers, AWACS aircraft, etc. At the same time, our own fighter aircraft will operate in radio silence mode - that is, they will be invisible to the enemy and calmly cut out jammers, AWACS aircraft, etc.
          If the air defense and missile defense system is not layered and does not have an air component, then it is of no value and it is not a problem to uncover it.
          Thank you for laughing about the outdated active radar))) Of course, we don't have any RTR equipment in our troops))) I laughed even more about the new physical principles - I just watched the news on Channel One)))
          1. 0
            17 June 2020 02: 21
            Quote: Yarhann
            gosh, what bird .. it's all from the realm of a spherical vacuum and a horse. Separated air defense-missile defense is now impassable by any aircraft attack means. simply because it consists of very powerful ground-based radars + airborne radar systems - that is, RTR and AWACS + fighter aircraft.

            - Saddam Hussein once thought exactly the same thing, poor thing ... request
            1. +1
              17 June 2020 08: 36
              oga in Iraq once there was a layered air defense system at least at the level of the USSR 80s))) yes yes they made a lot of fun.
        5. 5-9
          -2
          14 June 2020 10: 27
          AGM is an abbreviation for guided air-to-surface missiles .... rather than the PRR type .... You can not read further from such an expander
      2. 0
        12 June 2020 12: 27
        Quote: Aron Zaavi
        Add that the carrier of this missile can be F-35 and the problem for air defense is doubled.

        F-35 or another plane at a distance of 300km no longer plays a role.
        But if you use a cargo plane-battery with the possibility of volley launch .......
        1. +2
          12 June 2020 14: 09
          Quote: Genry
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          Add that the carrier of this missile can be F-35 and the problem for air defense is doubled.

          F-35 or another plane at a distance of 300km no longer plays a role.
          But if you use a cargo plane-battery with the possibility of volley launch .......

          If the F-35 has the ability to operate in the direction of air defense not from 300, but from 100 km, then the air defense response time to the threat will be reduced.
          1. 0
            12 June 2020 14: 12
            Quote: Aron Zaavi
            If the F-35 will be able to work out in the direction of air defense not from 300, but from 100 km, then ....

            Then the new rocket just sucks.
          2. 5-9
            0
            14 June 2020 10: 29
            Yes, even the Su-17 ... what's the difference? You can work out only because of the radio horizon.
  2. +2
    12 June 2020 07: 28
    Maybe this is a "problem" for those who did not serve in air defense ... any aircraft moving in any environment, including air, creates disturbances and reveals itself. This is an axiom. Therefore, we will find and knock down and deceive the GOS. The fact that such a weapon has appeared only proves that it is necessary to have on ships a multichannel, all-angle impenetrable short-range air defense missile system, something like the RAM system with missiles from PM, and installed in the center plane of the ship to an amount of at least two PU. (stern and bow). As on German corvettes. And this should be done for a long time, since the appearance of small-sized aircraft bombs, which any fighter can pour out in dozens, requires an urgent solution to this problem. Since the presence of 12-32 SD missiles on our BNK will not save the situation.
    1. 0
      12 June 2020 10: 17
      Yes... indeed... the "topic" of creating a non-traditional type of SAM system, but a purely anti-missile system, as was once implemented in the RAM ship direct defense system, is arising... A more "specialized" missile (interceptor) is also needed... A "RAM" type would be suitable for this, that is, with a combined seeker (IR + PR seeker) or an interceptor with an AR seeker.MM, and for "complete happiness" - an AR seeker.MM + IR... A more maneuverable missile is also needed... and therefore - with gas-dynamic control...
      1. +1
        12 June 2020 13: 10
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        A more "specialized" missile (interceptor) is also needed ...

        There are 9M100.
        The Pantsir works well against single missiles.
        1. +1
          12 June 2020 14: 06
          Quote: Genry
          There are 9M100.
          "Shell" works normally against single missiles

          We need NEWER ammunition! If the Russian Ministry of Defense has realized this, then we should expect corresponding "news" in some time!
          1. +1
            12 June 2020 14: 10
            Quote: Nikolaevich I
            Need more NEW ammunition!

            What are you missing? What characteristics are needed?
            And then as an accountant at work: "I want a new computer." Yes, please get: new but the same.
            1. 0
              12 June 2020 15: 04
              And I thought that between “new”...(but the same) and NEW there is a difference...even a visual one! wink As for the characteristics, I have already expressed myself in a previous comment ... [/ b] ---- more "specialized" missile (interceptor). that is, with a combined seeker (IK + PR.GSN) or an interceptor with AR.GSN.MM, and for "complete happiness" - AR.GSN.MM + IK ... A more maneuverable missile is also needed ... which means - with gas dynamic control ... 1. Lighter (small-sized) missiles will be needed, of which more can be placed on the "same" launcher... 2. It will be necessary, nevertheless, to equip interceptor missiles with a seeker..., for example, IR + PRGSNMM; 3-mode ARGSNMM; 3. Equipping interceptors with DPU (the property of "super-maneuverability") There are ideas for interceptors of a different concept, but I will keep silent about this for now. As an additional means of counteracting PR missiles, one can offer "copter"-type drones equipped with transmitters-simulators of radars ... corner reflectors to create active and passive interference... But to explain in more detail and clearly, one would have to aim for an "article"...
              1. +2
                12 June 2020 18: 18
                Quote: Nikolaevich I
                a more maneuverable missile is needed ... and therefore with gas-dynamic control.

                In dense layers of the atmosphere (low altitudes) for short-range air defense missiles, gas dynamics are not needed.
                The 9M100 has an IR seeker and a controlled engine thrust vector - this is more than enough to intercept enemy missiles on their final trajectory, when maneuvering them would already be fraught with a miss.
                "Carapace" is also good at shooting down anti-radar missiles, but it has a low rate of fire (max 10 targets per minute).
                1. 0
                  13 June 2020 01: 52
                  9M100 is a good interceptor! But in modern wars, and especially in the wars of the "near future", air defense systems, both "land" and naval, will have to defend themselves from a large (!) number of attacking anti-radar munitions... while maintaining the function of destroying a large number of air-to-surface weapons carriers! Then it will be difficult to have your cake and eat it and read Playboy at the same time! Anti-aircraft missiles with a tendency to reduce their weight and size characteristics with the "previous" destructive capabilities are becoming promising. That is, to combat the "harm-like" anti-aircraft missiles of the latest modifications, an interceptor missile, for example, the RIM-116A type, is very promising in terms of weight and size characteristics... the 9M100 is "heavier and larger"... much fewer of them will fit on the launcher! Even, GOS (IR + passive "radar") "from RIM-116A" is quite appropriate for an interceptor missile of "harm-like" anti-aircraft missiles (!), considering the rather long engine operation and the operation of the active radar homing head of the mm-range! A combined homing head is desirable, sir! I already wrote that for the 9M100 it is desirable to develop an active radar homing head... In the anti-aircraft missile interceptor version 3- or 2-mode MM-range radar seeker is desirable with a combination of active, semi-active, passive or active, passive modes! What the 9M100 missiles do not have... When intercepting supersonic anti-aircraft missiles of the "harm" type of the latest modification, gas-dynamic control of the DPT type, in my opinion, is more preferable than gas-dynamic control of the OVT type... because it provides even greater maneuverability... a more "lightning-fast" reaction when correcting an impending miss of the interceptor! Moreover, it can work even when the cruise engine "burns out".
                  1. 0
                    13 June 2020 11: 02
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    In the PR-missile interceptor variant, a 3- or 2-mode MM-range radar seeker with a combination of active, semi-active, passive or active, passive modes is desirable!

                    Now, explain why all this is needed for a short-range missile? And in your RIM-116 this is not.
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    9M100-more "heavy and large" ... they will fit much less on the PU

                    If we take into account that the 9M100 is installed in vertical launchers, without a heavy rotating turret, then the number will be the same, while the reaction to targets from different sides is improved. Large dimensions provide greater energy and allow the missile to be used as a ground-to-water (ground-to-ground) missile, and at low altitude, the range can reach 30 km.
                    Quote: Nikolaevich I
                    gas-dynamic control of the DPT type, in my opinion, is more preferable than the gas-dynamic control of the OVT type ... because. provides even more agility ... more "lightning" reaction

                    The 9M100 already has such a reserve for overloading the maneuver that it makes no sense to go further.
          2. 5-9
            0
            14 June 2020 10: 31
            What for? The main plus of the Shell is just cheap rockets and that there are many of them ...
      2. -1
        12 June 2020 15: 33
        I, as if fountaining, see PU A-215 "Grad-M with 8 blocks for 160 NURS, which, if something happens," screwing on the simplest seeker can create "fences" at ranges of up to 40 km for all flying objects, including terrible ones. " drones ".... or further ???
        1. 0
          12 June 2020 16: 52
          A similar option is also possible... Of course, it is not necessary to make a "direct defense system" on the "base" of the A-215... (of a ship, air defense missile system, or other object...)! But at one time, MLRS of a similar purpose were proposed... the difference of which was greater "multiple charges", "thanks" to the small caliber... for example, by the French! In the USSR, "Mozyr" can serve as an example to follow. At present, "Tekhmash" is going to do something similar. A long firing range is not at all necessary for systems of this type... (an anti-aircraft missile, for example, will not go anywhere anyway... it will fly to a known "point"!...) NURS and other unguided striking elements were proposed as striking elements... The functionality was to "fill" the calculated combat information and control system of the defensive system with a "cube of space" where, according to "all calculations", an enemy missile should fly... an anti-aircraft missile or anti-ship missile! But such systems also have their downsides... It seems that "specialized" anti-missile systems with guided missiles... missiles with a homing head are more promising!
  3. +7
    12 June 2020 08: 18
    We, too, would not hurt to buy heels of pieces - for study. They bought the X-31 from us. I wonder under what "tsar" this was allowed?
    It’s a pity they don’t sell ...
    1. +2
      12 June 2020 11: 39
      When EBN it was- when the MA-31 sold
  4. -4
    12 June 2020 11: 45
    The body of the new rocket for compactness is equipped with aerodynamic ridges instead of wings - see the photo of the layout in the internal compartment of the F-35 weapon.

    The Americans are very strange people: an anti-radar missile with a flight speed of 2M is knocked out "from a slingshot" by any anti-aircraft missiles when approaching the near air defense zone.
    1. 0
      12 June 2020 15: 29
      Well, if the crew has a sober competent calculation, with a higher technical education, and not like in Libya, the shells were controlled by stoned fellahs in slippers ....
    2. 0
      13 June 2020 23: 29
      The speed was reduced to increase the range - there is nothing surprising here. In such sizes there is no other option. I think the main target will still not be ground-based radars, but air-based ones, i.e. AWACS aircraft, bombers, transport aircraft, etc.
  5. +3
    12 June 2020 20: 08
    Quote: Genry
    Ground defense is always more advantageous than air defense. There is no restriction on energy ....

    And it was well shown by the example of the first war in the gulf. When US countermeasures were able to drown out tightly all of Iraq’s air defense.
    And some of our chief designers alas left for another world after tests at the Southern training ground, when its air defense systems could not oppose anything to the aviation component attacking the complexes in a training battle. It is not worth it to relate to this development option and make the next super-wunderwaffe unparalleled in the world from its own RSL systems.
    1. 0
      13 June 2020 23: 35
      my good specialist in SAM, in Iraq there was a rather miserable air defense-missile defense system; old SAMs operating on fixed frequencies are quite successfully jammed and this is no secret. There was also a weak air component of the air defense-missile defense system - that is, the hawks that were supposed to destroy jammers. The echeloned air defense-missile defense system does not consist of only ground-based systems - the air component is mandatory - AWACS aircraft, ELINT and hawks.
  6. -2
    13 June 2020 07: 14
    And the AGM-88G missile is really very powerful.
    One launch of such a missile towards a Russian facility and... and Washington is gone, and New York is gone..., and America, alas, is gone too...
  7. +2
    13 June 2020 11: 25
    It won't fly 300 km. The Americans don't disclose the real range, but it's about twice as long as a regular "short" missile.
  8. 0
    14 June 2020 00: 11
    The new missile will be adapted for placement in the internal arms compartments of Lockheed Martin F-35A fighters (F-35B / C aircraft will only be able to carry it on external suspensions)
  9. 5-9
    0
    14 June 2020 10: 41
    PRR is a thing in principle with dubious effectiveness (although F16 by Harm according to Patriot has definitely figured it out), so the addition of ARLGSN will increase efficiency ... But the missile is more likely a sea missile, a variant of RCC ... On land, its sworn armor will be knocked down at such speed, and the price with two GSNs go well for lam bucks will fly away ....
    1. 0
      22 August 2020 22: 30
      You're wrong
  10. 0
    22 August 2020 22: 27
    “The current rocket AGM-88G AARGM-ER is another representative of a rather old family, dating back to the AGM-88 HARM product. At the same time, it is being developed on the basis of the later AGM-88E AARGM and is maximally unified with it. In both cases, we are talking about a serious restructuring of the original structure, which appeared back in the eighties "

    - So it is written that the reader may get the impression that we are talking about some kind of modernization of an old rocket. In fact, this is not the case. The AGM-88G is a new rocket that resembles its predecessors from the 80s, rather only for its intended purpose. It is only the control system that makes it related to the current AGM-88E serial rocket, which may well still undergo changes, in terms of software, for sure, plus updated components.

    In fact, the missile control system 88E (and future 88G) is special in that it includes a passive radar sensor, plus an active millimeter-wave radar in the final section, plus INC / GPS (and the newest military signal M-code is supported) a two-way transmission channel data and digital map of the area. Also warhead with Lethality Enhanced Ordnance (LEO) technology to increase the density of the fragmentation field and the likelihood of damage (version 88G)
    I don't remember any other missiles with such technologies. Very dangerous car