New Russian spacecraft will go to the moon

54

The head of Roscosmos, Vladimir Popovkin, made a statement to the media that a new space manned spacecraft would be created in Russia by 2018. In the same year will be conducted and its unmanned tests. He also talked about which use cases are being considered for the new ship. This is not only long-term missions in autonomous mode, but also flights to the moon, as well as a flight to a space station located between our planet and the moon. Popovkin noted that the new system is supposed to be made transport not immediately, because first of all it is necessary to check how accurately and correctly the ship is assembled, whether errors and errors are made in its layout scheme, and whether it can descend to the second surface of the Earth. cosmic speed, as it comes to heavy loads. In the new ship will be solved the problem of reusable use due to the heat-shielding coating.

Also, the head of Roskosmos added that if the heavy launch vehicle is not ready to launch from Vostochny space center (this rocket is supposed to be built before 2015 in the Amur region), the unmanned launch will be carried out using the Zenit launch vehicle. And the tests themselves will be conducted from the Baikonur cosmodrome. Such decisions Popovkin explained that the industry should not be dependent on the occurrence of possible problems and difficulties in the construction of the East, and the associated delays.



The head of Roscosmos also added that new spacecraft may in the future replace the Soyuz spacecraft.

A promising space manned spacecraft will be able to land ten times more accurately than the Soyuz did thanks to the use of a parachute-jet system during landing.

Similar information was also announced by Gennady Raikunov, General Director of the Central Research Institute of Mechanical Engineering, who noted that work on the creation of a new spacecraft had already started. In his conviction, at present, the Russian space industry has significantly expanded the tasks of mastering and exploring outer space. That is why it is necessary to concentrate all attention on the development of space infrastructure. A new promising transport manned system should help in solving a whole complex of tasks related to conducting scientific research, servicing vehicles located in outer space, and carrying out flights to the moon.

Alexander Zheleznyakov, academician of the Russian Academy of Cosmonautics named after K. Tsiolkovsky, also shared his thoughts on a new project. According to him, the need to create such a ship has been brewing for a long time. And the reason for this is quite serious - the fact is that the Soyuz ships, which are currently in use, were built back in the 60s of the last century. And, even despite all the modifications and upgrades, they can no longer meet modern requirements. In such a situation, there was an urgent need to create a new spacecraft that would have a large payload, would have great flight simulation capabilities and orbit heights. He also noted that the ships of the new generation are needed not only in Russia, but in the whole world. By creating a new promising manned system, the Russian state will be able to consolidate its position in outer space. In addition, this system will provide an opportunity to master not only the near-Earth orbit, but also to rise much higher to the Moon, and perhaps in the future will become the real basis for making flights to asteroids and planets that have not yet been studied.

At the same time, it’s not worthwhile to say that with the help of new ships Russia will be able to take leading positions in the global space industry, since similar projects are being developed in other countries around the world - in the United States of America, China, and Japan. It is noteworthy that all the developments that are carried out in different countries have approximately identical parameters and capabilities. And from the one who will be able to complete the construction first, conduct flight tests and bring new ships to the world market, he will be the winner. Therefore, if Russia is claiming leadership, it should consider not only creating a new system, but also that it should appear first in the world.

Recall that the tender for the development of the conceptual design of a promising Russian-made manned spacecraft was won in April 2009 by the corporation Energia. It is envisaged that several modifications of the system will be created that will perform certain functions: preparing flights to the near-moon and earth orbit, de-orking large space debris and satellites that have failed, carrying out repair work on spacecraft.

Earlier, Alexey Krasnov, the head of Roscosmos manned programs, also noted in particular that flight tests of a promising spacecraft created in Russia will begin in 2015-2016.

Materials used:
http://www.odnako.org/blogs/show_19830/
http://ria.ru/science/20120718/702412855.html
http://www.space.com.ua/gateway/news.nsf/HronolR/226D90DBA04C59FCC2257A400030EC08!open
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    24 July 2012 07: 45
    Personally, I have already missed the news about space successes and am tired of news about failures (read crashes). And I want to be optimistic! ..
    1. 755962
      +13
      24 July 2012 09: 17
      But it’s possible to create such an unmanned aerial vehicle, much less a space one. Americans are skerking quietly, launching their own X-37 and do not blow into a mustache. And the most plausible purpose of this device is to run technologies for the future space interceptor, which allows inspecting other people's space objects and, if necessary, disable them by kinetic action. This purpose of the device is fully consistent with the document "US National Space Policy" of 2006, proclaiming the right of the United States to partially extend national sovereignty to outer space.
      1. Diogenes
        +13
        24 July 2012 11: 33
        I also heard after all these peaceful religions that the mission of the ship is military beyond! Friends-partners also do not doze off in this direction.
        1. Docker76
          +1
          25 July 2012 00: 13
          Quote: Diogenes
          don't doze off in this


          ..... so are ours, "Not a bastard" .......... laughing
      2. Tirpitz
        +12
        24 July 2012 12: 10
        Quote: 755962
        Americans skerry quietly, launch their X-37s and do not blow into their mustache

        As they say less words - more work. and do not tremble on the whole world that by the year 202 they will create something that the whole world will envy.
        1. Yeti
          +9
          24 July 2012 12: 18
          God grant that words are not just words. And then we have an adjustment on the adjustment.
          1. White
            +9
            24 July 2012 12: 24
            The picture actually depicts Clipper, the beginning of which was laid back in the early 90s, but he was never born.
            SpaceX Dragon designed and launched in 6 years.
            So far this is an empty concussion.
        2. +25
          24 July 2012 12: 25
          Quote: Tirpitz
          As they say less words - more work. and do not tremble on the whole world that by the year 202 they will create something that the whole world will envy.


          if we compare the state of domestic and American programs for the success of tests, then perhaps the lag in our development will be only in scale advertising companies. Yes, at aerospace exhibitions, we exhibit models and stands, and do not flood television and the Internet with colorful clips and 3D models. However, our designs are less virtual. They fly, and contact is not “lost” with them. Perhaps the Americans will be able to bring their programs to existing systems. However, they are unlikely to succeed in achieving “all-encompassing superiority”. While the Americans cannot conduct a successful test of the maneuvering ICBM warhead (FHTV-2), we held it during the 2004 Security Exercise. According to their results, Vladimir Putin said that
          “The latest technical systems will be delivered to the Russian army, which will be able to hit targets at intercontinental depth with hypersonic speed and high accuracy, with the possibility of deep maneuver both in height and course.”
          And Yuri Baluyevsky added this statement with the words
          “The device can bypass regional missile defense systems ... can solve the tasks of overcoming missile defense systems, including promising ones”
          . As you can see, while we successfully cope with global challenges.
          - GLL-8 was accelerated by a launch vehicle to speeds close to 14M (information was first presented at the MAKS-97 air show).

          - GLL-VK ("Needle") - a model for testing the future "aerospace aircraft" program "Eagle". Acceleration also with a booster.

          - GLL-31 (VLL-AS) - a model of a hypersonic weapon that does not go beyond the atmosphere. Acceleration was carried out by MiG-31.

          X-90 / GELA is also a model of a hypersonic missile (NATO even assigned a code and designation - AS-19 “Koala”). Tested from the side of the Tu-160, a range of about 3000 km., Cruising speed of 4-5M.

          - In 2004, TsIAM experts said they were preparing for testing an unnamed apparatus with three engines, capable of speeds up to 15 times the speed of sound.
          All the above-mentioned masterpieces of military thought are still the designs of our designers of the 70-80s of the last century (it’s good even now that they have begun to realize while the fried Amer’s eagle has not pecked). And the situation is as follows.
          There was a strong school at the Keldysh Center - liquidated in 95-98
          There was a strong school at TsIAM - separate scientific areas remained
          There was a strong school in TsAGI - the old people retired, whether there is anyone unknown from the young.
          There was a group in Novosibirsk, I don’t know what the situation is now, but I don’t think they survived, their funding was cut off primarily in the 90s, and they had very interesting work on "wave flights".
          The only design bureau specializing in the development of SPVRD ("Buri", "Cuba", "Onyx" in particular) and the GPVRD was liquidated in 2003, not without the participation of managers of the TRV corporation from Bolshev.
          The surviving design bureaus (Novator, NPOMash, KBM, "Raduga") do not have specialists in the development of SPVRD (GPVRD).
          Nobody is going to create a specialized design bureau for the development of this area today. These are the pies. Although on Soviet topics of 20 years you can still wipe your amers nose, and then you need to fuss now.
          1. +2
            24 July 2012 15: 29
            Quote: Ascetic
            Although on Soviet topics about 20 years old, you can still wipe your amers nose, and then you need to fuss now.

            Thank you Stanislav! At least a little at the end of the post pleased. winked
          2. Docker76
            +1
            25 July 2012 00: 20
            ...... joy and sorrow .........
            ....... good crying......
            .PS ........... angry .......
          3. +1
            25 July 2012 05: 36
            Ascetic - hello, of course I understand everything and really want to believe in the bright future of our domestic cosmonautics and all that, but for now Popovkins and others like him sit at the Roskosmos feeder (and they see Roskosmos as their big pocket because they simply are stupidly absent brains) this GREAT industry will be at a stage of decline and quietly go out ... your last paragraph is a vivid confirmation to which you can add another cart and a small cart of such nigat ... there were words, it will be by 20-30-50 of the current century they lead to melancholy and despondency, for such terms give the nouveau riche an indulgence of innocence * for the donkey or the paddies will die over the limitation period, but they will not miss their profits and will live on stolen and looted happily and even chuckling).
            I really look forward to the landing of the fundamentally new Nasov rover and wish the whole team great luck in this matter - at this stage we can’t even create anything close in terms of complexity and information efficiency. Where are in our Roscosmos today's Korolev, Chelomey, Glushkov ... they are not there and peacocks and orangutans are sitting in their places ... what progress has been made, so far I can see the sunset of the golden heritage, misunderstood by some decorated individuals.
            We are still poorly and poorly able to rivet mid-level weapons, but to create breakthrough directions we need a base, but you can see what’s done with the base.
            I give it for 2-3 years and it will be possible to put an end to our space cabs.
    2. Patriot of Russia
      +2
      24 July 2012 13: 21
      Dmitriy69while these are just words. what we just do not promise lately
    3. freedom
      +3
      25 July 2012 00: 18
      Article big "-" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      When will this talk in this country end ?????????????
      We have already become world champions in the 18th football (((((((
      I understand that by the 15th year of Pop ... there will be no more kin?
      RKK ENERGY is not able to put new systems on serial production. She barely copes with the old ones.
      BOLD POINT.
  2. +2
    24 July 2012 08: 33
    Very good news. Progress steps into the future.
    I would like to see the final version of the ship.
    1. Abramovich
      -16
      24 July 2012 14: 28
      Everything is simple and uncomplicated there - such a large silver pan "made in Russia" a la Phobos Hryunt. lol
      1. biglow
        +11
        24 July 2012 14: 52
        Abramovich,
        when the Americans start flying on it to the orbital station, you will probably say that they optimize costs
        You don’t have enough Israeli sites, you’re crawling on Russian sites to scam everything in a row. Everything is paid for both good and evil.
        1. biglow
          +8
          24 July 2012 15: 33
          minusers what really hurts? or burns?
        2. BYRY
          -1
          25 July 2012 23: 47
          For evil, seven times.
    2. NickitaDembelnulsa
      +1
      24 July 2012 16: 29
      It will be final, I think, like an N-1 rocket, it would be great!
  3. Senzey
    0
    24 July 2012 08: 50
    The news is certainly wonderful. Unions it's time to change. Only the first we are unlikely to be in the construction of such a ship. Americans have long been working on creating their own instead of shuttles. In any case, our position in space will be on top. We will have our own space exploration program. There is also enough space for tourists.

    1. DYMITRY
      +11
      24 July 2012 09: 08
      The Americans do not have their carrier, and in the coming years is not expected. First of all, because there is no production of engines for space. And there is nothing to produce them on. Companies dismantled, mostly retired staff. So they can build a ship, but our carriers will take it out into space.
      1. +11
        24 July 2012 12: 22
        Quote: DYMITRY
        So they can build a ship, but our carriers will launch it into space.


        That's right, Dmitry, I completely agree with you, I wanted to write about it myself, but you got ahead of me +
      2. Eraser
        -4
        24 July 2012 13: 19
        Are you writing this from a parallel cheers-patriotic universe? wassat
      3. White
        +1
        24 July 2012 13: 44
        The United States does not have missiles, which is Atlas-5, Delta (II · IV), Minotaur (I · IV), Taurus, Falcon-1, Falcon-9. Falkon Heavy is being developed and I believe in its flight more than in the Angara.
        Perhaps you meant a flight to the moon and we don’t have a rocket to fly (if you call Energy so the USA has Saturn in the museum too)
      4. deodorant
        -10
        24 July 2012 15: 16
        hooray patreots they are like to carry nonsense
    2. NickitaDembelnulsa
      +1
      24 July 2012 16: 28
      I would not argue much about our future successes. But they don’t make plans for the future. I don’t argue about the Americans, they will make their breakthrough, at first they make secrets, and then they bang and bring something new. And about Russia, of course, space is priority for us, and all our super developments are kept secret. And yet, I would not look at this so optimistic. But this is my opinion, maybe everything is going well with us, but we don’t know about it yet?
  4. Trofimov174
    +2
    24 July 2012 08: 53
    Is this talking about PPTS? If so, then somehow they don’t have time in time, in theory in 2016 they should have finished testing the non-manned modification, and in 2018 they should have sent the series with the astronauts on board so that by 2020 everything would be ready to conquer the Moon. This is still in the plans of the Russian Space Agency for this decade.
    1. DYMITRY
      +2
      24 July 2012 09: 11
      Who knows .... Cosmos and to this day remains the most closed area. And given that nuclear money for space began to be allocated in 2005, who knows what has already been built, except for those who directly work there. And the people working there are extremely silent ...
      1. NickitaDembelnulsa
        0
        24 July 2012 16: 22
        Cosmonauts are primarily soldiers, they obey only orders, they say keep quiet, they will keep quiet. They will say they keep state secrets, they will keep it.
  5. +5
    24 July 2012 08: 54
    ... Where are the promised "CLIPER" and "RUS". And it seems that all the assigned tasks cannot be solved by one system. There should be two of them. One for the conquest of deep space, which can not be lowered to earth at all, but collected in orbit and contained there. And a reusable transport system with the most simplified launch (as a basis, you can take the MAKS developments and preferably with an air launch. And if we take the latest statements that a carrier in excess of a heavy class is not needed, it turns out that the Korolev assembly system in orbit with a subsequent start) from orbit to the moon, etc. The main thing is not to suffer the fate of the USSR, where there is a large number of design bureaus that competed with each other.I did not have a common long-term program of space exploration.
    1. Trofimov174
      +1
      24 July 2012 08: 57
      Russia was canceled due to the parallel development of a system similar in parameters and purpose. The management decided not to repeat the mistakes of the Soviet lunar program and not to conduct several similar developments at the same time, which I think is the right decision.
  6. 0
    24 July 2012 08: 56
    I thought that he was kicked out for a fight, but he dreams of everything.
  7. Kaa
    0
    24 July 2012 09: 10
    This is all good, but where are the projects comparable to Energia? I propose to introduce a tax for the owners of large enterprises with a specific purpose for space programs, a tax on large expenses for dollar millionaires there, without a nationwide program nothing will work out quickly, we will no longer be astronauts, but the taikonauts. But after all, they were able to overtake everyone from 1945 to 1957, now that there is no more gunpowder in the flasks?
    1. Dryomin
      0
      24 July 2012 19: 38
      Quote: Kaa
      But they were able to overtake everyone from 1945 to 1957, now that there is no more gunpowder in the powder flasks?

      Boris Chertok himself said that the success of the primacy in space exploration by the Soviet Union was because there were delays due to problems with testing the launch vehicle, which solved military tasks. During the solution of these problems, the first human flight took place. As you know, a month later, an American flew, which means that in the USSR and in the USA they went foot and foot, but the championship is still ours and this is a matter of pride)
  8. Cosmonaut
    +1
    24 July 2012 09: 20
    Good news))))
    1. lotus04
      +3
      24 July 2012 09: 48
      Quote: Cosmonaut
      Good news))))


      What do you call news? The picture is "Clipper". This news is over 12 years old.

      Clipper, Russia, since 2000. A new spacecraft under development with a reusable cabin for delivering crew and cargo to low-earth orbit and an orbital station. Vertical launch with a Soyuz-2 rocket, horizontal or parachute landing. The crew is 5-6 people, the launch weight of the ship is up to 13 tons, the landing weight is up to 8,8 tons. The expected date is 2015.

      Already apparently, God forbid, in 2018.

      News damn it!
      1. FID
        +4
        24 July 2012 10: 43
        More than 30 years. In 1980, RSC Energia developed, but not approved, the project of the Zarya reusable spacecraft. In the mid-1990s, development continued and a project was created for a ship with a load-bearing hull (average between Buran and Soyuz), but due to lack of funding, the work was not shaky, not shaky. B2000 the project was named "Clipper".
      2. Cosmonaut
        0
        26 July 2012 01: 15
        I know what is in the picture. But better than nothing at all.
  9. 0
    24 July 2012 09: 22
    God forbid, God forbid .... otherwise the fall of the phobos-soil greatly damaged the reputation ...
  10. PARROT
    +2
    24 July 2012 09: 43
    And I personally plan to launch a spaceship in 2030, I'll take off the picture, sec.
  11. +1
    24 July 2012 10: 07
    I do not believe Popovkin. Especially after the scandal with his adventures. And did he make a statement or his spokesperson?
  12. FID
    +1
    24 July 2012 11: 14
    Apparently, Popovkin will instruct Poghosyan to design the ship and things will go! At first, it will be a 3-seater ship, and then, with increased funding, a lot, a multi-seat ship using a lot of things!
    1. Belarusian
      0
      24 July 2012 12: 23
      the main thing is to put glonas
      1. +1
        24 July 2012 12: 34
        belorus - "the main thing is that the glonas is installed" and the ZPS is not forgotten, led by the main domestic space groove made in Popovkin drinks
  13. cool.cube2012
    +4
    24 July 2012 11: 43
    I absolutely don’t believe these menagers. They’re hanging noodles to get a little budget. Russian space is the main thing to fill your pockets. The whole system is from the very top.
  14. +2
    24 July 2012 12: 12
    Ha, I knew that against the backdrop of DOWNLOAD in a wonderful office called "roskosmos" - this managerial sharaga would pull out the bogey of the long-suffering "Clipper" into the light of day and pass him off as the newest hell knows what ..., but yes, it's quite relative Ukraine recently threatened with all sorts of kakras about the Clipper, because they consider it their own development. Interestingly, how the brutal macho Popovkin is doing with the inflatable thermal insulation of the newest boat and finally this topic he has in his work (to refuse wassat )? I repeat once again that until this muthena, along with the siphons from Roscosmos, is thrown out, be this office in the deep popovkin ZhO.
    PS This post does not apply to normal men from Roscosmos.
  15. keylogger
    +2
    24 July 2012 13: 26
    I want to read the news in the present tense ...
    1. NickitaDembelnulsa
      0
      24 July 2012 16: 20
      But efforts must be made, nothing will be done!
  16. +3
    24 July 2012 14: 04
    In Russia they used to say: they did not boast about walking on the army, they boasted while walking with rati!
    How many plans were there, and where are the results?
  17. itr
    0
    24 July 2012 14: 51
    In the meantime, send the Head of Roscosmos Vladimir Popovkin on the old spacecraft one way. That's why making statements here, and so it is clear to everyone that this great space figure does not work until this time. Anyway, I hope so
  18. NickitaDembelnulsa
    0
    24 July 2012 16: 19
    Sorry, I don’t understand the meaning of the new moon landing, because we wanted to go there, and then we got over it, what’s the interest?
  19. sxn278619
    +2
    24 July 2012 16: 23
    Nefig to the moon fly. You give normal satellites in quality and quantity.
  20. foxhaund31
    0
    24 July 2012 16: 56
    With such corruption and venality in power, you can forget about records in space. Yes, and who will make the device? Engineers are literate retired, production masters, too, who are capable of something for a long time at Cape Canaveral. As a result, they’ll create some kind of pan, they’ll take the money away, cut the ribbon, and it will crash for 34 seconds. Say, but some grandmother turned on the radio in Asian mode and its waves fell into vibration in the installation of 3 acceleration units, and blah blah blah.
  21. +1
    24 July 2012 17: 35
    Simple question
    But is it possible to put all these talkers and promiseers at the table ...
    to solve the simplest problems in physics, special ... courses and other level 2-3-4 courses of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University (which Korolev, Yangel once solved there)

    And please - loudly announce the results - what our LEADERS are capable of.

    In my research institute, I can say (and I know it from facts) the whole audience, starting with the heads of departments, is complete f * flo.
  22. Insurgent
    +1
    24 July 2012 19: 04
    Aha and Popovkina, with Serdyukov to the moon send to completely
    1. 0
      5 July 2017 20: 55
      And then only these? It’s time, at least for a couple of hundred places, a one-time boat to bungle, or even a series of pieces so few ... I don’t even know how much is needed.
  23. +4
    24 July 2012 21: 19
    Under the Soviet regime, they did not talk much, but did in 1957, that is, 12 years after the Victory, a satellite was launched, and in 1961. Gagarin flew without much ado. And now there is a purely propaganda chatter with the date of the construction of communism in 20 years. Rejoice Russians in the distant future will be ahead of everyone and hope forever.
  24. 0
    24 July 2012 21: 21
    we'll see, otherwise it smells like pouring a lot of money again.
  25. +1
    24 July 2012 22: 47
    I always believe in the best but it seems to be like with the Hangar
  26. vikdik
    0
    25 July 2012 00: 17
    With manned flights, the future is difficult, it’s really expensive to stay in space, and the efficiency is small. More than half the time the astronaut takes to service himself. Need a target for a manned flight
  27. vylvyn
    0
    26 July 2012 03: 10
    Popovkin, if you provide green light for the new PAC as promised by 2018, we will forgive Vedishchev. The PAC is more important than w x y x. Give the Russian PAC!
  28. Simonov
    0
    31 July 2012 21: 36
    For the head of Roscosmos, the glane is not a result but a huge number of plans. Who will implement all this? Managers?
    If he breaks a couple of bottles against Bosko, plans will appear for flights not only to asteroids, but also to Jupiter. And even landing on the rings of Saturn.
    And what will the money be spent on? Yes, these are gas giants! Of these, gas can be pumped!
  29. 0
    5 July 2017 20: 52
    It’s time to move on to planning, in space, in everything. And then continuous trepidation. Enough. Over there, the Americans know what they turned into an unmanned devil. We would like to modernize the creations of Lozinsky and other designers of the Union into the matter.