Amphibious conveyor XM-158 Drake. Drake to replace Ducks

16
In 1942, the amphibious conveyor DUKW was supplied to the US Army. This machine performed well during World War II and was used by several countries. By the beginning of the fifties, this sample was outdated and required replacement. The result of subsequent design work was several prototypes. The largest historical and of technical interest is the experimental amphibian XM-158 Drake.


Experienced amphibian XM-147 Super Duck in the museum. Wikimedia Commons Photos




Needs and Suggestions


The existing DUKW amphibian with 6,2 t curb weight could take kg of cargo on board 2250. The car kept well on the water and developed a speed of the order of 8-10 km / h. However, by the end of the forties, the US Army ceased to be satisfied with such characteristics. Initially, this problem was solved by reworking the hull and a more powerful engine. The resulting XM-147 Super Duck amphibian could take 4 tons of cargo, and on the water it accelerated to 10-12 km / h. However, this was considered insufficient, which is why the XM-147 did not join the troops.

In the mid-fifties, General Motors Canada (GMC), which had previously created DUKW and its upgraded version, proposed a new amphibious conveyor project. It proposed to radically redesign the existing design and introduce a whole range of new technical solutions. All this made it possible to raise the load capacity to 8 t and increase mobility.

Amphibious conveyor XM-158 Drake. Drake to replace Ducks
Prototype XM-158. Photo Strangernn.livejournal.com


The new sample received the working designation GMC XM-158 (in some sources there is an erroneous spelling XM-157). The name Drake ("Drake") was also used - it was an allusion to the nickname of the serial DUKW, which was called "Duck" in tune.

To increase the carrying capacity, the promising Drake needed a whole set of innovations. GMC practically developed the hull-boat from scratch, created a new version of the power plant and transmission, as well as the chassis and screw group, which meet new requirements. As a result, Drake had only minimal external resemblance to its predecessors, but at the same time had to show advantages over them.

Design features


The amphibian XM-158 was built on the basis of a new hull-boat with characteristic contours. The body was made of steel and aluminum parts connected by welding and riveting; all seams were sealed with a special paste. The hull received a curved lower frontal part, above which an almost horizontal "deck" was placed. There were vertical sides with reinforcement and a vertical aft leaf. On the sides were niches under the wheels. The central part of the bottom formed a tunnel for the units.


"Drake" on land. Photo 477768.livejournal.com


The layout of the XM-158 resembled the previous amphibians. In the front of the hull placed the power plant. Various transmission units were located next to the engine, under the cab floor and under the cargo area. Behind the engine compartment, crew seats and a control post were located. Almost all other body volume was given under the “on-board body”. Behind it was a small platform for various devices.

Calculations showed that the Drake needs a power plant with increased power. This issue was solved with the help of two diesel engines GMC-302-55 with an output of 145 hp. with own transmissions. Power flows were not combined, which simplified the design. Each engine was coupled to its own Alisson automatic transmission with 12 speeds. Behind her was a transfer case with two gears, as well as a two-speed power take-off.


The workplace of the driver. Chronicle frame


The left engine set in motion the wheels of the first and third axles, the right - the second and fourth. Also, the engines were responsible for the operation of two propellers. On a good road, it was proposed to use only the right engine and have the wheel formula 8x4. On soft ground, the left motor should also be started, getting the formula 8x8. Both engines should have worked on the water, driving two screws.

The special power plant was characterized by high fuel consumption - about 90 liters per 100 km. Four tanks with a total capacity of 636 l, combined into a common fuel system, were placed in the casing.

The chassis included four axles with independent air suspension. As an elastic element, a reinforced rubber cylinder with compressed air was used. By changing the pressure in the cylinder, it was possible to adjust the clearance and suspension stiffness. In addition, such a suspension made it possible to pull the wheels upward when moving on water, slightly reducing drag. The chassis included eight single-wheel 14.75-20 wheels.


Propellers Chronicle frame


Under the stern of the hull was placed a swinging block in a vertical plane with two propellers. On land, he rose, protecting the screws from damage. On water, the unit lowered into working position. There was no separate steering wheel. Water control was carried out using the front swivel wheels and due to the differential change in the speed of two screws. A wave-reflective shield was provided on the nose of the case.

The cab for the XM-158 was similar to the equipment of previous machines. The front of the driver and commander was covered by an inclined windshield with a narrow roof and side glazing. The driver was on the left and had all the necessary controls. A steering wheel, pedals for controlling two engines, as well as a whole set of levers from all transmission boxes and propeller controls were located at the control post.


Amphibian on the road. Chronicle frame


The bulk of the “deck” was occupied by a flat cargo area. In its flooring, hatches were provided for access to the internal units of the machine. A platform with a length of about 7 m and a width of less than 2 m could take up to 8 tons of cargo (on land). The carrying capacity when driving on water was reduced in accordance with weather conditions.

In front of the cabin and behind the "deck" there were numerous mounts for various equipment. Amphibian carried a trench tool, spare parts and various property. At the stern, modeled on DUKW, the winch was kept. With the help of additional arcs, the machine could be equipped with a removable awning to protect the crew and cargo.

Initially, the XM-158 Drake transporter did not have its own weapons. Later, after the adoption of the army, he could get a machine gun for self-defense. The crew and the landing also had to have a personal weapons.


Water test. Chronicle frame


The total amphibian length was 12,8 m - almost 3,5 m longer than DUKW. Width - 3,05 m, height along the rudimentary roof - 3,3 m. Curb weight was determined in 14 t. At maximum load 8 t, the total mass reached 22 t. On the highway, amphibian accelerated to 70 km / h, on water - to 14 km / h. Cruising range by land - 700 km.

Failure "Drake"


In 1956, GMC built a prototype of the new amphibious conveyor. In some sources it is mentioned that the Drake car remained in one copy. According to other materials, several such prototypes were built. One way or another, the number of Drake was minimal, but sufficient for testing.


All-terrain vehicle rises to the wave. Chronicle frame


During the tests, the prototype (s) confirmed the basic driving characteristics. The car briskly moved on land, both on the highway and on rough terrain, overcoming various obstacles. Comparisons with the serial amphibian DUKW clearly showed the advantages of the new model. The Drake successfully overcame the obstacles on which the lighter but less powerful Duck simply got stuck.

The payload characteristics were fully confirmed, and in this regard, the XM-158 was ahead of all existing American-made amphibians. She took as much load as two Super Duck or four serial DUKW.


Return to land. Photo Strangernn.livejournal.com


However, not all the features of the new XM-158 suit the army. First of all, they criticized the overly complex power plant and transmission, as well as extremely inconvenient control systems. So, the lack of mechanical connection between the engines did not allow synchronizing the speed. This was not a problem on land, but made it difficult to navigate on water. The difference in speed made it difficult to maintain course; the driver had to constantly steer and control the operation of the engines. The control of the power plant and transmission in all modes was complicated by the ergonomics of the cab: next to the driver was a whole battery of levers for various purposes.

Thus, the resulting amphibian had fairly high characteristics and exceeded similar developments. However, the price was the overly complex and expensive construction of key units, as well as various operational difficulties. Probably, GMC designers could save their development from the identified problems, however, it was too complicated. In fact, a radical restructuring of the power plant and transmission was required, which could affect other systems.



Such a revision of the project was considered inappropriate. Amphibian XM-158 Drake did not enter service with the United States. An unfinished car with a lot of problems was not offered to foreign customers. Thus, the prototype (or prototypes) was left alone.

After testing


According to various sources, in the future, the experienced Drake was used as a platform for working out new solutions. He was later sold to a commercial company. For several years, a unique car drove tourists somewhere on the West Coast of the United States. Apparently, in this role, she worked out the rest of the resource, and then went for recycling. Unlike the XM-147 Super Duck, not a single XM-158 sample has been preserved.

In the fifties, GMC made two attempts to create an amphibious conveyor to replace the obsolete DUKW, and none of them were successful. The XM-158 Drake project stopped due to the excessive complexity of the design and the inappropriateness of its improvement. However, the US Army was not left without amphibians. In parallel with GMC, new companies developed new models, and their projects turned out to be more successful.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    27 October 2019 18: 15
    I can’t believe that the "drake-duck" could normally ride on rough terrain. Here the bridges would be evenly spaced along the entire length, maybe then ...
    1. +4
      27 October 2019 21: 17
      Quote: mark1
      I can’t believe that the "drake-duck" could normally ride on rough terrain. Here the bridges would be evenly spaced along the entire length, maybe then ...

      Why do you think so? The BAZ vehicle for the Oka BAZ-6944 is arranged in the same way. It was a wonderful car. hi
      1. -1
        28 October 2019 04: 11
        Not just her. A series of floating conveyors - PTS, PMM, And they all have a similar configuration. Actually about it below there are comments with photos.
    2. +1
      28 October 2019 01: 40
      Quote: mark1
      I can’t believe that the "drake-duck" could normally ride on rough terrain. Here the bridges would be evenly spaced along the entire length, maybe then ...

      oh well ... Floating chassis BAZ-6944 family "Basis" to your side


      yes, of course it would be ideal (for all-terrain wassat those. better geometric cross) "bridges", but there are still customer requirements for the arrangement of units and assemblies of the "product" on the chassis. but, even with the wheels spaced at the corners feel , BASES are not weaklings on impassability - the suspension of each wheel was equipped with double-acting hydraulic shock absorbers and provided maximum travel within 220 mm.



      and yes, are there many good wheeled all-terrain vehicles (in the BAZ category) with equally spaced bridges in the world?
      1. +1
        28 October 2019 04: 07
        But what does the BAZ and the layout have to do with it !? You Look at the distance between the second and third bridges at the "Drake" and at the BAZ.
  2. +4
    27 October 2019 18: 38
    As far as I remember, something similar was being developed with the Union, but was considered inappropriate.
    1. +1
      27 October 2019 20: 02
      Title in my opinion is precisely the Soviet analogue of such a machine.
    2. +1
      27 October 2019 23: 27
      Quote: sabakina
      As far as I remember, something similar was being developed with the Union, but was considered inappropriate.

      hi


      ZIS-485 BAS (BAS - a large water-floating car) - an amphibious car, produced from 1950 to 1962. A BAS machine could transport 25 people or up to 2,5 tons of cargo through water barriers.
    3. +1
      28 October 2019 00: 32
      Quote: sabakina
      As far as I remember, something similar was being developed with the Union, but was considered inappropriate.

      The Union considered that the tracks are more reliable. IMHO For this reason, there was a release of conveyors K-61, PTS and its modifications.
      1. +2
        28 October 2019 01: 57
        Quote: Amurets
        The Union considered that the tracks are more reliable.

        not so much more reliable as there was not enough capacity (capabilities) to produce one more "product" in already busy industries. BAZ was fully engaged in the production of chassis for "Tochka"

        "Oki"

        "Wasps"

        also, a little, DBK "Redut"

        and SPU-143 for the Reis drone
        [media=https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/236311/252965890.5/0_1ce891_f44f48d2_XXL.jpg]
        1. +1
          28 October 2019 06: 26
          Quote: self-propelled
          BAZ was fully engaged in the production of chassis for "Tochka"
          Well, at the heart of the BAZs was still the ZIL-135. "Among the numerous off-road vehicles developed at SKB ZIL, this model was waiting for the happiest fate. The four-axle ZIL-135LM truck was produced in series for about 30 years. Various weapons systems were installed on its chassis, which served in the Soviet army for a long time, such vehicles were exported to a number of countries. "
          https://topwar.ru/163200-amfibijnyj-transporter-xm-158-drake-selezen-dlja-zameny-utki.html#comment-id-9800677
  3. +8
    27 October 2019 19: 10
    However impressive how he holds the wave. Famously!
  4. +2
    27 October 2019 19: 22
    Testers reckless in the video. With such excitement, tip over, just spit. Moreover, it is managed quite poorly.

    Again, the SuperDuck was scolded for the body, it is impossible to roll something into it, the gun there or a jeep, only lift and load over the side. It is just as inconveniently done here. Well, we have already written about patency above, such a long car will obviously cling to the middle of the belly when leaving the water.
  5. 0
    27 October 2019 22: 06
    In general, the situation is typical for the USA. Roughly speaking, all that was required for this unit was trained, versed in the technique of a carrier. Otherwise, the complexity of management is caused only by the desire to ensure the reliability of the structure, without complicating it. The simpler - the less likely it breaks.
    And then - the classic mattress upholstery. We don't want to understand anything ourselves - "we have paws" (c) It is necessary that my uncle did the control for - three buttons: "forward", "backward" and "warm up the hamburger". And the fact that such control will not only be less reliable, but also more expensive, is good for mattresses - you can cut it ...
    1. 0
      29 October 2019 01: 26
      Quote: Jerk
      Otherwise, the complexity of management is caused only by the desire to ensure the reliability of the structure, without complicating it. The simpler - the less likely it breaks.

      We had a similar transmission on the BTR-60 (70-?). When they rolled me on it, some sort of jambs got out all the time: then in one gearbox the gears are turned on, and in the second there is none, then there is a problem with the brakes (I applied the brake, it puffed, the authorities heard that the brake was applied, and it drove into it time pulled the handbrake), then did not fit into the turn, and so on. etc
    2. 0
      3 November 2019 20: 32
      The simpler the better. Besides the fact that it was difficult to manage, this also had to be maintained. The army needs simple and reliable solutions. It may turn out that the driver will be killed during the landing, how to bring the car to shore without knowing the features? And if one engine fails, it will generally have fun swimming in a circle, and it may drown quite calmly. It is normal practice not to allow such samples into the troops.