"Strategic triangle" designer Bartini

25
One of the main tasks of Soviet aircraft construction in the fifties of the last century was the creation of bombers capable of quickly and efficiently attacking objects of a potential enemy. The existing Tu-4 did not fully meet current requirements and only the development of a completely new aircraft could solve the problem. Contributing to the creation of a revolutionary new aviation technology already in 1952 made the head of the department of promising schemes SibNIA them. S.A. Chaplygina (Novosibirsk) R. Bartini.

"Strategic triangle" designer Bartini
Tu-4


It all started with a preliminary study of the appearance of the aircraft, codenamed T-203. Using only the knowledge of high-speed aerodynamics and mathematics, Bartini quickly calculated several aerodynamic configurations and chose the best one. The intergral tailless tail with a variable wing along the leading edge of the sweep turned out to be optimal. For that time, this aircraft look was too new, so the T-203 remained on paper.

Nevertheless, the developments and calculations on this topic were not in vain. In 1955, Bartini completed the preliminary draft of the supersonic A-55 bomber. This aircraft was largely reminiscent of the T-203, although its design was worked out much better and more detailed. Of particular interest in the new project was the method of application. Bartini decided to make not just a long-range supersonic bomber, but also to provide it with practically unlimited range. For this, the A-55 was supposed to be an amphibious aircraft. Thus, A-55 was able to take off from concrete airfields, go to a given area and, if necessary, get on the water and produce refueling from submarines or surface ships. In addition, the amphibiousness would allow A-55 to be in a certain area for a long time, soaring from which it was possible to strike the target in a matter of minutes. It can be said that if T-203 was just a bold project, then A-55 was very bold. An interesting fact: for the characteristic shape of the aircraft in terms of and A-55, and all subsequent projects of this family received the nickname "strategic triangle".

A-55


According to Bartini’s calculations, the A-55 design allowed for a maximum speed of about 2500 km / h at a distance of at least ten thousand kilometers. The leadership of the aviation industry, having familiarized themselves with the project, issued its conclusion: the project is certainly interesting and useful, but under current conditions it is not feasible. Nevertheless, thanks to a number of studies on the topic, Bartini was able to defend the project and was entrusted with the task of continuing to work. The entire 56 year went on further purges, consultations with experts from related industries and other studies. In April, the next 1957 of Bartini was transferred from SIBNIA to the OKBS of the Ministry of Aviation Industry. At this point, the project again slightly changes its appearance, and the leading institutes of the industry, TsAGI and CIAM, are involved in the work. In particular, the staff of the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute explored the characteristics of takeoff and landing on water, as well as the possibilities for a long stay of the aircraft on the surface of the sea or ocean.



At this stage, the project received a new index - A-57. Now it was a whole complex of aircraft armament, designed to deliver strikes at a great distance from the home airfield. The plane with a delta wing of variable sweep on the leading edge had the design of an integrated circuit. The fuselage and wing mating was done in such a way that there was no noticeable border between them. Amphibiousness of the aircraft was supposed to provide the original ski landing gear. For taxiing on the airfield and take-off, the A-57 aircraft had to be equipped with wheeled carts discharged after separation. The possibility of landing on the water was provided by three skis retractable in flight. The ski landing gear also allowed to land on snow or ice. The implication was that such an opportunity would help to fly not only from continental airfields or the world ocean, but also from icy airfields in the Arctic. As a weapon for the A-57, the RCC intercontinental projectile was developed by designer P. Tsybin. Due to the layout of the internal volumes of the RCC carrier aircraft was to be fixed on the upper side of the A-57.

The crew of three, according to a preliminary draft, had all the means for a long stay on board the aircraft, including in terms of autonomous actions. In addition, it was possible to carry out all technical work from the upper surface of the wing. This design feature provided the opportunity for small repairs by the crew or technicians of tanker ships.

Over the next few years, project A-57 underwent a series of changes of a different nature. For example, the motor nacelle alone was altered three times for different engines. In 1961, the project A-58 was even introduced, according to which the aircraft had a nuclear power plant. Anyway, all the changes in the end did not entail the start of construction of at least a prototype. Project A-57 was extremely complex, expensive and requiring the creation of a mass of new technological processes. In addition, the Bartini aircraft was much more visible to radar stations than the recently created Tu-95. The project has been closed. But on the basis of A-57 another project was created - F-57. From the original aircraft, it differed in size, purpose, and slightly less technological complexity of design.



According to the results of a series of consultations, the State Committee for Aviation Engineering under the USSR Council of Ministers (GKAT) decided to continue work in the direction of the super-sound tails of the Bartini structure in an experimental manner. To begin with, they decided to limit themselves to a 20-ton demonstration aircraft. Not wanting to leave his project without any military prospects, the designer began to make not just an experimental aircraft, but a front bomber. Along the way, the aircraft became heavier in relation to the original plans - its take-off weight increased to 25 tons. On the F-57, it was supposed to install two prospective turbojet engines VK-13 with a load of 10 thousand kgf. These engines provided the aircraft with an estimated cruising speed of about 2400-2500 km / h. At the same time, the aerodynamic layout provided good flight characteristics both at supersonic and landing speeds in 260 kilometers per hour. Normal flight range was about 2800 kilometers. From Bartini's previous projects in the field of supersonic bombers, the F-57 received a ski landing gear, albeit its design has been significantly updated. The original scheme of the ski chassis implied one main support located near the center of gravity and two additional ones under the wings. In other words, Bartini equipped his F-57 with a kind of bicycle chassis, but without wheels and without one main support. In the fuselage of the aircraft were provided for the placement of weapons. F-57 could carry from 15 bombs caliber 100 kg to one and a half tons.



The aviation department officials thoroughly analyzed the project and all related documentation and came to the same conclusion as before. F-57 was a really good bomber, but again there were problems with the technological part of construction. Despite the increased convenience of manufacturing a number of components and assemblies, the F-57 was still unsuitable for mass production. Nevertheless, in GKAT they began to gradually prepare for the beginning of the production of the prototype aircraft. As a site for the construction of the prototype was considered the Moscow plant number XXUMX. While the designers under the leadership of R. Bartini were preparing documents for transfer to the enterprise, new ideas were being developed in the military leadership of the country. At the beginning of the 30s, several changes were made to the structure of the aviation industry and related areas of production. In the context of the F-60 project, they led to the fact that Plant No. XXUMX could not even begin preparations for the assembly of an experienced front-line bomber. Due to the inability to continue work and a slight bias towards the rocket technology, the F-57 project was closed. He was destined to be the last of the "strategic triangle" family. Creating a project A-30 and its "heirs" required a lot of tests, calculations, etc. All of them were not in vain. Most of the knowledge gained was applied in the development of new supersonic bombers, as well as passenger Tu-57.


On the materials of the sites:
http://dogswar.ru/
http://sergib.agava.ru/
http://testpilot.ru/
http://airbase.ru/
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ra1647
    +5
    7 July 2012 09: 50
    Yes, not a bad idea, it’s a pity that we didn’t start to wave it further
    1. Teploteh - nick
      +15
      7 July 2012 11: 03
      In Soviet times - there were 1000 chi ideas and projects. Most of which were frozen, due to either uselessness or inability at that time to realize them in full.
      Now what is happening. Many of these projects are taken out of the archives. And taking into account modern technologies and capabilities, they look - what can be done and what cannot.
      Like it or not, Soviet science and its projects have bypassed their time by 50 years.
      Satan alone is worth it. Yes, and Topol - on the development of which they spent 1.000.000.000 Soviet rubles! Yes
      But now - due to all that Soviet, those developments, those Geniuses - we are with you - we live and will continue to live! Yes
      1. White
        -1
        8 July 2012 20: 45
        Shitty idea and it was proved by the USA Convair F2Y-1 Sea Dart.
        By the way, there is an article on Topwar about him that is why I won’t list all the little ones.
      2. 0
        8 July 2012 23: 45
        Soviet power was strong!
  2. +14
    7 July 2012 10: 57
    In the design developments of the 50s and early 60s, Robert Bartini and Pavel Tsibin, our famous aircraft designer A. Tupolev I saw dangerous competitors, and made every effort and talent (and he was a brilliant intriguer) to bury these developments. This was facilitated by the negative attitude of Khrushchev N.S. to aviation, as well as a greatly reduced budget for aircraft development.
    The same fate befell a little later, thanks to the "help" of AN Tupolev. , the wonderful T-4 aircraft of the aircraft designer P.O. Sukhov.
    1. +8
      7 July 2012 11: 19
      Gamdlislyam
      I agree, Tupolev spoiled quite a bit, but this unit justifies him somewhat.
    2. +3
      7 July 2012 12: 17
      Competition is competition, but Tupolev's planes for some reason turned out to be much cheaper than the same "three-corners". Just a dull pursuit of performance and novelty is almost meaningless - all equipment must be designed for real use.
      1. +2
        7 July 2012 19: 41
        Dear colleague Glenn Witcher, I will not argue, because not one of the aircraft competitors Tupolev A.N. did not go into the series. Built prototypes were not even fully tested. This is the M-50, and T-4. Many were not even embodied in metal. The cost of the car in this case played a secondary role. If the Tu-160 is so cheap, why were they built only a little more than 2 dozen? By the way, the design of this aircraft used the achievements of Bartini, Myasishchev, Sukhov, and many other design teams. It should be borne in mind that in the USSR there was not only competition, but centralization, when it was required for speedy implementation into a real product.
        1. +2
          8 July 2012 10: 01
          Quote: Gamdlislyam
          not one of the aircraft competitors Tupolev A.N. did not go into the series.


          The statement is not entirely true, since the Myasishchev M-4 and 3M aircraft were built in series.

          Many interesting developments "did not go" because of the shortsightedness of individuals. BUT (!) In my opinion, the control system in the Soviet Union was more perfect than what we have now. UAC is not interested in revolutionary projects. And the IAP, as we can see, allocated significant funds for the development of science and various scientific works in new directions.
          1. 0
            8 July 2012 10: 49
            Dear colleague Dmitry, I agree with you, the Myasishchev M-4 and 3M aircraft were built in series. But, these development aircraft of the early 50s. Already the next Myasishchev M-50 aircraft was not even fully tested, and Myasishchev Design Bureau was dispersed. (1960).
          2. +2
            8 July 2012 19: 17
            Quote: Zerstorer
            Not a true statement,


            More precisely, it’s completely wrong
    3. +2
      8 July 2012 19: 26
      Quote: Gamdlislyam
      the beginning of the 60s of Robert Bartini and Pavel Tsibin our famous aircraft designer Tupolev A.N. I saw dangerous competitors, and made every effort and talent (and he was a brilliant intriguer) to bury these developments.


      And I think what are they (Tupolev and Bartini) sitting in the jail together? Now it’s clear that Bartini’s designs were buried, and it’s quite clear why Bartini presented the Tu-144 to Tupolev, he really didn’t see it

      [
      Quote: Gamdlislyam
      thanks to the "help" of Tupolev A.N. , the wonderful T-4 aircraft of the aircraft designer P.O.


      Again, the secret was revealed, and I thought it a sinful thing that in 1972 the winner of the competition for the promising bomber was Sukhoi Design Bureau, bypassing both the Tu-160 and M-20, and the T-4 grave digger was the T-10 (Su-27) that made the Sukhoi Design Bureau He was more important, but no grandfather knows better.
  3. Svistoplyaskov
    +15
    7 July 2012 11: 49
    Oh, these Italians - everything that doesn't do everything looks like a Ferrari!
    On the Bartini monument at the Vvedensky cemetery in Moscow, the inscription: In the land of the Soviets, he kept his oath, devoting his whole life to ensuring that red planes fly faster than black ones.
    1. Num lock U.A.
      +2
      7 July 2012 14: 26
      against the backdrop of the successes of Soviet and German engineers, the Italian are in the shadows, although their design school is at least no less strong
    2. +6
      7 July 2012 17: 46
      Quote: Whistling
      Oh, these Italians - everything that doesn't do everything looks like a Ferrari!

      Really stylistically similar to Ferari!
      But maestro Bartini also had a less elegant, but more practical project, VVA-14:

      Multifaceted and talented was a man!
    3. mind1954
      +3
      8 July 2012 02: 59
      Recently recalled that from near Moscow two regiments of Er-2, regularly,
      flew to bomb Berlin!
  4. +3
    7 July 2012 14: 34
    And for me, here is slowly and begins to loom the outline of the future PAK-YES !! request
  5. NickitaDembelnulsa
    +4
    7 July 2012 15: 11
    Ah cool designer, and now one of his offspring VVA-14 - It rots in the back areas of the Monino Museum, It’s sad to see it live ... recourse
  6. 8 company
    +5
    7 July 2012 16: 13
    Bartini was as talented as he was naive. Believing in earnest in the communist idea, he joined the Italian Communist Party, to which he gave his entire inheritance - about 10 million dollars. After Mussolini came to power, he was transported to the USSR, where he began to design aircraft. In 1938 he was arrested for participating in the "conspiracy of Tukhachevsky and espionage in favor of fascist Italy." From 1938 to 1946 he worked in the "sharashkas" of the NKVD. It’s good that they didn’t shoot or torture me in the camp, because at that time it was mortally dangerous to be a foreigner in the USSR. Rehabilitated in 1956.
    1. mind1954
      0
      8 July 2012 03: 10
      And, in general, in the country, in that historical period, the company was operating
      silly naive "C grade students"!

      So I am reporting to you that they do not believe in the Communist Idea.
      It is shared or not !!! A place for believers in the church!
      From what I know about Bartini, something doesn’t really follow that he was
      to believers!
      1. +1
        9 July 2012 09: 57
        Quote: mind1954
        So I am reporting to you that they do not believe in the Communist Idea.


        This is your subjective opinion, and there is still an opinion that the code of the builder of communism is written off from the commandments
    2. vpm
      vpm
      +3
      8 July 2012 12: 55
      I would say thank you for Bartini for his "naivety", living in Italy under Mussolini, he could have put his genius in a completely different direction.
    3. 0
      8 July 2012 16: 12
      Well, how much can you moan ?! Read his biography, memoirs and turn on his head, turning off hysteria (bleeding to kill hundreds of millions of tortured). Or do you get paid for it?
    4. +2
      9 July 2012 01: 53
      When there is work to do everything else, the little things in life. Genius Bartini is ahead of his time.
  7. +6
    7 July 2012 17: 07
    One can argue for a long time about whether these "triangular" strategists were needed or, on the contrary, not needed. One thing cannot be denied - Bartini was one of those few people in the history of mankind who was able to get ahead of his time ...

    By the way, there is a fairly reasonable assumption that it was Bartini who served as the prototype of Bulgakov’s Woland. Moreover, this assumption deserves full attention, given the fact that Bulgakov was personally acquainted with Bartini ...
  8. +1
    8 July 2012 14: 10
    In our country, everything that is very advanced and extremely promising is immediately hidden under the cloth and taken out only when, well, oh, very hot. Of course it is sad.
  9. 8 company
    +3
    8 July 2012 20: 49
    From the memoirs of L. Kerber "Tupolev Sharaga":

    "Here, lost in thought, bowing his patrician head, sits Bartini. Instead of a toga
    he is dressed in a black prisoner robe. The son of wealthy parents, he
    became interested in Marxism when Mussolini came to power - he emigrated to
    the fatherland of workers. Then he was quickly exposed and for the transfer of state secrets to the Italian intelligence (sic!) They gave him 25 years in prison. A talented design engineer, he created several aircraft in the USSR. Undoubtedly, he would have done more if he hadn’t been inclined toward original solutions that seemed bureaucratic from the state apparatus to be fantastic {See book of V.V. Shavrov
    "The history of aircraft designs in the USSR". Moscow, 1968}.
    Poor knowledge of the Russian language, but I must say that in the USSR, as in
    the time of Peter I, foreigners were treated very suspiciously, he made his way through all the slingshots of the bureaucratic apparatus and was appointed chief designer of plant No. 81 named after Holtzman ...
    ... Bartini was planted, and the twin-engine bomber that he created was renamed by the name of his deputy engineer Ermolaev in EP-2.
    Robert couldn’t understand anything, he was especially struck by the fact that he sold something
    Mussolini. Excitedly, he switched to Italian and began to speak it quickly. A word like inconcepibile was heard all the time. "
    1. +2
      8 July 2012 21: 39
      Quote: Company 8
      From the memoirs of L. Kerber "Tupolev Sharaga":


      That's right, it’s Tupolevskaya, and not TsKB-29 named after Tupolev