Construction of a submarine with ballistic missiles in the DPRK. Submarine for the Sea of ​​Japan

35
The Navy of North Korea has one of the largest underwater fleet. In the foreseeable future, he should replenish with new military units, and some details of upcoming events are already known. The other day, the supreme commander of the DPRK Kim Jong-un visited one of the shipyards and examined the submarine under construction.


The delegation of the leadership of the DPRK in the shipbuilding plant




Official materials


A visit of the country's leadership to the plant took place on July 23, as reported by the Korea Central Telegraph Agency. The report notes the special attention paid to the leadership of the construction of new ships, and its leading role. However, the Agency manages only the most general formulations and does not disclose the most interesting details.

TsTAK did not specify the type of submarine under construction and its purpose. Naturally, the characteristics of the ship, the composition of weapons, the tasks to be solved, etc. remain unknown. However, some of the information is still announced. Thus, the new ship will serve in the operational zone of the Sea of ​​Japan and strengthen the country's defense capability. In addition, several photographs have been published, in which both the delegation and individual parts of the submarine under construction are captured.

Solid assumptions


It is obvious that for specialists and the public outside the DPRK, the most interesting are the characteristics and capabilities of the new submarine, and not the role of the country's leadership in its construction. However, this kind of information was not disclosed. All this provokes the appearance of various assumptions and versions - including fairly plausible ones. Even the available information and published photos allow you to make estimates and projections.

It should be recalled that information about the new submarine has already appeared in the open press. A few months ago, South Korean media reported on the construction of a diesel-electric submarine with ballistic missiles. It was argued that the displacement of such a ship would be at the level of 3 thousand tons, and he will be able to carry about 3-4 missiles.


For auxiliary structures visible bow end of the submarine


The photos from the TsTAK contain only views of different parts of the starboard submarine. Partly in the frame fell superstructure with deck and felling fence. Curiously, the latter has undergone retouching. Framing does not allow to determine the dimensions of the ship with acceptable accuracy. However, there are other equally interesting details.

One of the new photos shows that the bow of the boat is made vertical or with a slight inclination forward, and in its lower part a characteristic convex fairing is provided. The stern of the ship is equipped with steering surfaces and a pair of propellers in the annular canals. The cabin has a simple streamlined shape without any distinctive features.

Considering the features of the exterior of a new North Korean submarine, the American profile portal Covert Shores comes to an interesting conclusion. Its author suggests that this ship is a new version of the development of Soviet diesel-electric submarines pr. 633 (NATO code Romeo). To refer to the North Korean development code is proposed Romeo-Mod.

Covert Shores believe that we are talking about a ballistic missile submarine cruiser, in its architecture reminiscent of the early Soviet development. The Romeo Mod can carry several ballistic missiles in silo launchers. Due to the large size of the current North Korean missiles, the installation must be placed inside the hull and felling fence.

An indirect proof of this version is the felling of a relatively long length. In the 633 project and its derivatives, a smaller design was used, and the introduction of two or three launch shafts led to its processing. At the same time increased not only the fence. The hull was supplemented with a new section in the central part. Due to this, it was possible to increase the available volumes without worsening the conditions inside the ship. Also, the result of this, as follows from foreign reports, was the increase in displacement to 3 thousand tons.


View of the stern of the ship


The type of the main armament of the new submarine is unknown. It can be assumed that this is a medium-range ballistic missile "Pukkkson-1", created a few years ago and has already passed the necessary tests. Such an SLBM is equipped with solid-fuel engine stages and can carry a nuclear warhead.

Flight performance characteristics of the rocket remain the subject of controversy. So, in the first tests, the shooting was carried out at a range of about 500 km, but for this purpose the modified flight trajectory was used. According to foreign calculations, the real range of the “Pukkikson-1” product can be in the range from 1000-1200 to 2000-2500 km. In any case, it is enough to defeat the objects of the nearest probable opponents of the DPRK.

As far as is known, the North Korean industry is still unable to build a nuclear power plant for a submarine. The new ship must be equipped with a diesel-electric installation, which determines its running and fighting qualities. It is unlikely that Romeo-Mod is radically different from other options for the development of the Soviet 633 project.

Published photos show that the construction of a new submarine is nearing completion, and in the near future it will be launched into the water. Further testing and other activities will take at least several months. Thus, her service will begin in the next few years.

Possible consequences


The emergence of a new submarine with ballistic missiles should have a great impact on the strategic nuclear forces of the DPRK. According to various sources, now in the ranks there are no more than a few diesel-electric submarines with similar weapons, which have limited characteristics. In such conditions, any new combat unit, regardless of its specific characteristics and capabilities, is necessary and useful.


Possible layout of the new submarine


The new ship may be the second well-known carrier of the newest North Korean SLBMs "Pukkson-1". The first boat with such weapons for several years continues its service and is known by the alleged name "Sinpo". With its help, several years ago, tests of a new missile were conducted, and by now, it seems that the latter has entered service.

The newest submarine to be on duty in the Sea of ​​Japan. More distant hikes are theoretically possible, but are associated with a lot of different difficulties. In this case, the ship will be able to solve its main tasks at small distances from the Korean coast.

The main task of the boat with the SLBM will be on duty at sea in anticipation of an order to launch a rocket attack on the targets of a potential enemy. Almost all potential opponents of the DPRK are located in the same region and cannot boast of a large area of ​​their territories. If the Pukkikson-1 rocket, according to some estimates, is capable of flying at a distance of up to 2-2,5 km, its targets can be any important objects of Japan, Taiwan and South Korea.

A new North Korean submarine could be a serious threat to nearby unfriendly countries, but it should not be overestimated. The real combat qualities of this submarine and the entire naval component of the DPRK SNF are limited by several objective factors.

Construction of a submarine with ballistic missiles in the DPRK. Submarine for the Sea of ​​Japan
Test launch SLBM "Pukkikson-1", 2016


First of all, the number of submarines and their missiles. According to various sources, the North Korean Navy has no more than 1-3 PLRB, including obsolete ones. All of them carry no more than 2-3 SLBMs with limited characteristics. Thus, submarine missile carriers are only a small, albeit a useful addition to the land-based missile forces.

The second problem is the limited tactical and technical characteristics. The submarines with medium-range missiles clearly lose the SSBNs with the ICBMs of the advanced powers. They are less effective, and in addition, they can be simple targets for the developed anti-submarine defense of the enemy.

Such problems and difficulties have an obvious solution, but it is beyond the power of the DPRK. To obtain all the desired capabilities, it is necessary to massively build modern-designed submarines with advanced weapons, showing high performance. However, as the slow construction of diesel-electric missile carriers with BRSD on board shows, Pyongyang cannot afford such projects. The appearance of each such submarine becomes a real event.

Nevertheless, even in the conditions of technical, technological and economic constraints, necessary measures are being taken, and the construction of new submarines is underway. Its pace leaves much to be desired, and the results are far from ideal. However, with all this, North Korea has the opportunity to develop the submarine fleet and provide strategic deterrence.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    25 July 2019 08: 05
    Something painfully shabby and wrinkled submarine, for a new ship. The penultimate photo shows the deflection of the sheathing sheets and some "ribs" of the vertical set. This can usually be seen on seasoned ships at a venerable age.
    1. 0
      25 July 2019 08: 29
      Some American and South Korean experts claimed that the boat was not really built from scratch, but modernized the existing one.
      1. 0
        25 July 2019 08: 35
        Probably it is. Vidocq in the submarine, to say the least, is so-so. On a newly built does not pull at all.
        1. jjj
          0
          25 July 2019 10: 38


          On this model, you can clearly see how the Soviet shipbuilders had to excel in order to place the missiles in 629A Ave. But how will the Koreans be able to place their missiles in this building?
  2. 0
    25 July 2019 09: 24
    Is it possible to determine the size of the boat by the size of the wheel from the cart (railway narrow gauge it seems) Well, see, with plus or minus 5m in length and 1-2m in height, it’s quite possible.
  3. 0
    25 July 2019 10: 31
    I think Project 633 is too small for ballistic missiles. The diving start system will not function normally. If only the rocket has small weight and size characteristics, which will definitely affect the firing range. In the fencing of the wheelhouse, judging by the photo, no more than one or two launchers will fit, and if in the superstructure - three limited dimensions. The Shinpo type carries one missile. Perhaps in the photo is the restored project 629A (the decommissioned boats of the Pacific Fleet of this project were delivered to Korea in 1993 for cutting into metal, the missile silos and stabilization systems were not dismantled). They could and adapt to their needs. Based on the performance characteristics of the boats and the technological level, it can be assumed that the performance characteristics of the missile system approximately correspond to the Soviet D-4 with a range of 1420 km.
  4. +2
    25 July 2019 13: 37
    If the Pukkykson-1 rocket, as some estimates claim, is capable of flying at a range of up to 2-2,5 thousand kilometers, any important objects of Japan, Taiwan and South Korea can become its targets.

    In fact, in open sources, the range of 1200-1500 km is indicated. And taking into account the dimensions of this missile, IMHO, the range of 1200-1500 km is a more realistic range than 2000-2500 km.
  5. 0
    25 July 2019 16: 22
    If the boat is 3 thousand tons, then in addition to 3 solid fuel BR there are places for air-independent installation.
    1. 0
      25 July 2019 16: 39
      Quote: Kostadinov
      If the boat is 3 thousand tons, then ... there are places

      Did you consider the monument to the leader?
      seriously, shipbuilding in the DPRK is somewhat archaic and it is worth remembering.
  6. +1
    25 July 2019 16: 36
    in the photo "View of the stern of the ship" the hull in places resembles a corrugation
    this is normal? never seen this
  7. +2
    25 July 2019 18: 06
    Quote: Kostadinov
    If the boat is 3 thousand tons, then in addition to 3 solid fuel BR there are places for air-independent installation.

    Why not atomic? God forbid that they build those 2024 or 3 boats that they have planned within the stated time (until 4). And you already think about the air-independent. Even those who have developed underwater shipbuilding, not all have it, not everyone "reached" it. and you about this DPRK boat.
  8. val
    -1
    25 July 2019 18: 22
    In my opinion it is bred. Eun ordered to make a layout and once again strain Trump.
  9. 0
    25 July 2019 19: 20
    Quote: val
    In my opinion it is bred. Eun ordered to make a layout and once again strain Trump.

    This is hardly bred. Information about the laying of boats with SLBMs appeared around the beginning of 2017. . The point is to make a boat model if you have a weapon for it. I think that the boat is still available
    1. 0
      25 July 2019 20: 36
      .
      "I watched the cartoon about Chip and Dale, but that doesn't mean that I believe that chipmunks talk" :-)

      They do not have rockets underwater launch, and now they are suicide to use from the surface.
  10. +2
    25 July 2019 21: 23
    Quote: VVAU
    They don’t have underwater launch missiles, but now they’re suicidal.

    No? Sure? But nothing that they experienced it (successfully) a couple of years ago. It was originally a liquid-propellant liquid-propellant ballistic missile, now with a solid-fuel engine





    The first and second photo - the launch of SLBMs with rocket engines, the third - with the solid propellant rocket engine
    1. 0
      25 July 2019 21: 43
      I do not believe. This does not happen. They still cannot bring solid mace to Mace, and the impoverished country has already done.
      Photos can be any
      A couple of years ago, the site of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation was posted by Trident. Having written that it was a Mace.
      Putin gave American turntables to Stone.
      Koreans have their football team world champion :-) :-) :-)
      One of the weak tools is misinformation.
      1. -2
        25 July 2019 23: 28
        Alexander, if you please. one comic advice: "do not read American newspapers before dinner, but better not read them at all, and your appetite will be better and your head will be brighter."
    2. -2
      25 July 2019 22: 34
      Vladimir, take a look here all are solid fuel, just in the first picture you can’t see a plentiful smoke trail (cut off in the photo), the LRE is neat like a lit candle without smoke at all.
    3. -2
      25 July 2019 22: 38
      And here the completely unbroken fire trail expands to the bottom (this is only for solid propellant rocket engines), if the photo would not further cut off the smoke there is a dense and wide trail.
  11. -2
    25 July 2019 22: 44
    Kirill. as it is not "comme il faut" sounds SSBN with ICBMs, SSBNs are armed with SLBMs, regardless of what range they are 150 km or 11100 km, and an ICBM is a land system.
  12. -3
    25 July 2019 22: 56
    In general, Koreans are great. An SLBM with a non-metal hull (in the ceremonial photographs it can be seen that the hull is wound with a carbon thread, impregnated with epoxy resin), the rocket is clearly two-stage. (do not let not take Polaris A-2.) range of at least 2000 km, but rather more, thermonuclear warhead-250 kt, weighing about 650 kg (in the BB case) - this is serious. There are not many countries capable of this - The USA, the USSR (Russia), France, the PRC and NOBODY more, even the Great Britons could not.
  13. -1
    25 July 2019 23: 02
    Even the custodians were the first to launch their own SLBM M 1 and M 2 (from 1974 to 1978) with nuclear (non-thermonuclear) warheads of 500 kt and weight 1360 kg. here you have the backward DPRK.
    1. +2
      26 July 2019 11: 34
      Stop making people laugh.
      Nothing happens out of nothing :-)
  14. 0
    26 July 2019 10: 39
    Quote: Old26
    Why not atomic? God forbid that they in the declared time (until 2024) built those 3 or 4 boats that they planned. And you’re already thinking about air independence.

    And this is information from Taiwan. They told the world that the DPRK was offering them VNEU several years ago. I don’t have any solid foundation.
    Another thing is that VNEU developed and adopted in Germany and the USSR about 60-70 years ago. What such boats have been doing for a long time except France and Germany and little Sweden.
    1. val
      0
      26 July 2019 11: 08
      And they did not offer a rocket to the moon, or a perpetual motion machine?
      In the country, people are eating grass, and you are carrying a blizzard.
      Did you consider the distance from Vladik?
      If he covers Un, Primorye will get it.
  15. +4
    26 July 2019 11: 25
    Quote: sergey k
    Vladimir, take a look here all are solid fuel, just in the first picture you can’t see a plentiful smoke trail (cut off in the photo), the LRE is neat like a lit candle without smoke at all.

    Sergey, I looked through all the photos again and I must say that with the first photo (with the first pair) I probably got excited. The second photo is definitely liquid. She was mainly shot from a submerged stand and EMNIP 1 or 2 times from a boat, after which it went to be repaired. Now the "wheelhouse" has a slightly different appearance than before these tests. The third pair is definitely solid fuel

    Quote: sergey k
    Kirill. as it is not "comme il faut" sounds SSBN with ICBMs, SSBNs are armed with SLBMs, regardless of what range they are 150 km or 11100 km, and an ICBM is a land system.

    That's for sure. It "hits" the eyes, although by and large, if accuracy is not required (and accuracy in defining military equipment is still desirable in a VO), then such a phrase - SSBNs with ICBMs, in principle, has the right to exist. This only suggests that the boat is carrying intercontinental ballistic missiles. Although you are absolutely right. Still, the generally accepted combination of SLBMs for the Navy and ICBMs for the Strategic Missile Forces

    Quote: sergey k
    In general, Koreans are great. An SLBM with a non-metal hull (in the ceremonial photographs it can be seen that the hull is wound with a carbon thread, impregnated with epoxy resin), the rocket is clearly two-stage. (do not let not take Polaris A-2.) range of at least 2000 km, but rather more, thermonuclear warhead-250 kt, weighing about 650 kg (in the BB case) - this is serious. There are not many countries capable of this - The USA, the USSR (Russia), France, the PRC and NOBODY more, even the Great Britons could not.

    That they mastered the technology of winding - no questions asked. The photo is not very clear, but nevertheless it is clear what it is



    The rocket is really two-stage, but I think the range is less. The estimate of 1200-1500 km is the most realistic. All the same, the dimensions of the rocket are smaller than even that of the Polaris A-1. There the length was 8,53 x 1,37 in diameter, here 7,37 x 1,1.


    The power of the thermonuclear warhead of the Korean missile is unknown, since they did not carry out explosions of such power. The latter, according to estimates, was somewhere in the region of 60 kt, although the North Koreans stated that they had mastered fusion. Therefore, the figures regarding the throw weight and head power are now a kind of "terra incognita".

    As for Britain and the fact that she “didn’t do it,” you are right. I have on my shelf "Album of military planes, helicopters and rockets of the capitalist countries" published by the Military Publishing House in 1965. So from ground strike weapons there is only an air-to-ground missile of the Blue Steel type. And nothing more. Of the unrealized ones, they had only the anti-ship Green Cheese (Green Cheese) - an anti-ship nuclear tactical missile with 10 kt Air-to-Ship warheads and the unrealized Blue Strike project - MRBM with a range of 2800 km. All the rest of the implemented ones are air defense missiles, ATGMs. For some reason, they "fell under" the Americans and did not develop their missile technology. With the French, everything is clearer there. Leaving the NATO military organization, they were forced to develop their rocketry.

    Quote: sergey k
    Even the custodians were the first to launch their own SLBM M 1 and M 2 (from 1974 to 1978) with nuclear (non-thermonuclear) warheads of 500 kt and weight 1360 kg. here you have the backward DPRK.

    I repeat. There is no data on the creation of such a charge. The final test was EMNIP 60 kt. They stated that they had mastered fusion, but only declared. Tests of such power that it could be said unequivocally that there was no "thermonuclear" charge.
    But there can be no doubt that they are good fellows. Although, to be honest, I'm not happy with "their regime". But this is "their regime" and their business. Yes, they received some kind of help from the USSR in the 50s and from China, but their developments are impressive in themselves. To do it ourselves, and at a rather serious level, is an indicator of the national-technical level (given, in principle, the general backwardness of the country). Indeed, sometimes the North Korean ones are the basis for both Pakistani and Iranian developments.
    1. +2
      26 July 2019 11: 36
      Sergey is another exalted at the bet.
      Understood people do not take him seriously.
  16. 0
    26 July 2019 17: 29
    I repeat. There is no data on the creation of such a charge. The final test was EMNIP 60 kt. They stated that they had mastered fusion, but only declared. Tests of such power that it could be said unequivocally that there was no "thermonuclear" charge.

    The first information beat about magnitudes 5,8, then adjusted to 6,0. At Americans, magnitudes first hit more than 6,2.
    North Korea showed a charge in the pictures. Estimates of its power range from 150 to 450 ct. Of course, there is no guarantee that the charge was thermonuclear. A full guarantee will be when the DPRK conducts an ICBM test with this charge somewhere in the Pacific Ocean. Such an idea hit in 2017 because some senators did not believe in the USA either.
  17. -1
    26 July 2019 17: 40
    Quote: val
    And they did not offer a rocket to the moon, or a perpetual motion machine?
    In the country, people are eating grass, and you are carrying a blizzard.
    Did you consider the distance from Vladik?
    If he covers Un, Primorye will get it.

    Americans need to be asked about the moon - they can offer the Saturn-5 rocket, and even better, Hollywood.
    As long as there is DPRK, Primorye is not in danger - there will be a clear sky, sun and peace. Now, if suddenly the DPRK is not then everything can beat.
    1. val
      0
      26 July 2019 18: 28
      Heard, heard ..... :-)
      War is peace, truth is a lie, black is white.
  18. +2
    27 July 2019 11: 00
    Quote: Kostadinov
    The first information beat about magnitudes 5,8, then adjusted to 6,0. At Americans, magnitudes first hit more than 6,2.
    North Korea showed a charge in the pictures. Estimates of its power range from 150 to 450 ct. Of course, there is no guarantee that the charge was thermonuclear. A full guarantee will be when the DPRK conducts an ICBM test with this charge somewhere in the Pacific Ocean. Such an idea hit in 2017 because some senators did not believe in the USA either.

    "The further into the forest, the more firewood / or the thicker the partisans"
    The greatest power was indicated by those who were the farthest. Norse. They said about 140 ct. All others indicated power ranging from 50-60 to 108.1 kt (according to Chinese data).
    Assessing the power of the warhead by the appearance of the warhead is very cool.
    The point is that there is no information that the charge was thermonuclear, although the Koreans claimed it. In general, we at one time experienced a NUCLEAR charge of 400 kt. NUCLEAR, NOT THERMONUCLEAR. And I'm sorry, but as Stanislavsky said, I DO NOT BELIEVE. I DO NOT BELIEVE that having experienced 5 charges with capacities from 0,4 to 22 kt, the sixth already immediately became thermonuclear.
    They won’t even think about any test in the Pacific Ocean. Firstly, they don’t have KIK ships to track something there in the Pacific Ocean (even in China, they rarely have problems with KIK ships to their maximum range). And secondly, a test of charge in the Pacific Ocean. will lead to the fact that everything will mount up on the DPRK, including and Russia with China, as DPRK violates fundamental test ban agreement in three environments


    Quote: Kostadinov
    While there is DPRK, Primorye is not in danger

    In addition to the DPRK itself. since no one knows that once again he will be able to wean Eun
  19. +2
    27 July 2019 11: 47
    There is a photo of Un with a nuclear device such as peanuts, we called it a dumbbell.
    The acquaintance of the deaf-mute said that they received such a compact thermonuclear fusion in RTB in 1986.
    So estimate the terms.
    Eun stupidly bred everyone, his opinion :-)
    1. val
      -1
      29 July 2019 14: 02
      This is probably a photo.
      1. 0
        15 August 2019 21: 24
        First date with Lolybomb! So romantic )))
  20. 0
    15 August 2019 21: 23
    All for the sake of preserving the "gains of communism." Well, the sacred Kim family in power, by itself)