Robotic complex Rheinmetall Mission Master. Transport, scout and fighter on the same platform

17
The world's leading companies are engaged in the development of promising robotic complexes suitable for solving various combat and auxiliary tasks. The German company Rheinmetall Defense for this offers RTC Mission Master. Such a project involves the construction of a universal wheeled platform chassis with a remote control, suitable for the installation of various systems and weapons.


MLRS and Mule when interacting with infantry




Modular approach


For the first time, the Mission Master project was told in 2017. In the future, the company-developer revealed new information and showed the newly developed modifications of this RTK. The latest information about the development of the project came just a few days ago. In the next advertising video, the work of the new military version of the Mission Master, which received missile weapons, was demonstrated.

RTC from Rheinmetall is based on a universal wheeled chassis with the required characteristics. The chassis has a cargo area suitable for mounting various equipment. It can be installed means of transportation of goods, optical systems or a variety of weapons. The installation of the target modules is not associated with the reworking of the chassis itself, although the finished machines may differ significantly from each other. Maximum payload - 600 kg. At the same time, some modules are noticeably lighter and leave some load carrying capacity.

The platform is made in the form of a compact four-axle machine and has a recognizable appearance. A power unit of unnamed type and control equipment are placed inside the case. The chassis is equipped with a set of video cameras for driving, and can also be equipped with lidars. The on-board equipment provides constant two-way communication with the operator, and also allows you to connect various target loads and control it remotely.

Robotic complex Rheinmetall Mission Master. Transport, scout and fighter on the same platform
Mission Master Cargo transports two wounded


Mission Master chassis on the highway reaches speeds up to 40 km / h. The car can float due to the rotation of the wheels, accelerating to 5 km / h. Control and communication are carried out using a wearable remote. All functions of the RTK are controlled by one operator.

Unmarked transport


The simplest option to retrofit the chassis is called Mission Master Cargo. It is considered as a "mule" and is intended for the transport of a variety of goods. The payload is placed directly on the roof of the case or on additional trunk frames of several versions. Such devices can be mounted on the sides or above the roof - depending on the type of cargo and the problem to be solved.

Equipment, ammunition, etc. it is proposed to transport on the roof and in side restraints from frames and belts. Mission Master Cargo can also operate as an ambulance transport. A pair of stretcher on longitudinal baskets on the roof is used to evacuate the lying wounded. Safety of the wounded is provided by safety belts and restraints.

Reconnaissance vehicle


Mission Master UGV-S RTK is designed for surveillance and reconnaissance. In this case, a larger superstructure and a telescopic mast are mounted on the chassis. The latter houses a block of optoelectronic equipment. The UGV-S can reach the required position and carry out the observation, raising the optics to the required height.


UGV-S reconnaissance vehicle with a raised mast


The UGV-S operator conducts real-time monitoring, and thanks to this, the unit immediately receives relevant information about the situation. At the same time, reconnaissance does not lead to risks for personnel - fighters can remain in a safe place while the RTC is operating in the danger zone.

Combat versions


The first of the combat options appeared RTK UGV-P. This machine is designated as a means of fire support units and has the appropriate equipment. In this version, the chassis receives a remote-controlled combat module with machine-gun and grenade launchers. Also shown is a prototype supplemented with a rear casing for equipment and safety arcs.

The main task of the UGV-P is direct fire support of the unit or independent work at a distance from the operator. It was also proposed to use such a technique for patrolling, assault, etc. The proposed set of weapons allows you to effectively deal with manpower, lightly armored vehicles and unfortified buildings.


Mission Master UGV-P with machinegun grenade armament


In the spring of this year, Rheinmetall showed a new combat version of the Mission Master. This modification of the RTK is completed with a launcher for missiles. A pan-tilt unit was used, on which two FZ220 packages were installed with seven guides on each and an optical-electronic equipment unit for guidance. In fact, we are talking about creating a short-range robotic rocket system.

This version of the Mission Master can use unguided and guided 70 mm caliber missiles. It is proposed to be used to inflict point or area strikes on enemy targets. Depending on the type of missiles used, the MLRS based on the Mission Master is capable of destroying manpower, fortifications and various equipment. Control systems allow you to shoot single and a volley. Shooting all ammunition takes 1,6 seconds.

Equipment on landfills


Since 2017, various prototypes of the Rheinmetall Mission Master family regularly undergo various tests under different polygon conditions. Checks are carried out both in Germany and in other countries. Their help determines the strengths and weaknesses of the new technology and ways of its modernization. In addition, the interaction of the RTK and the living fighters is being worked out.


The newest version of the complex - light MLRS


Some results of such events are of interest. So, in September last year, Rheinmetall participated in the competition ELK-2018. Its RTK Mission Master won by a large margin in the category of “mules” - vehicles for infantry escorts.

A few days ago, the company-developer has published a new video showing the operation of the complex in the configuration of the MLRS. Shots with moving over rough terrain and shooting were shot at the Denel Overberg in South Africa. It should be expected that new tests will take place in the near future, and Rheinmetall will surely show their most interesting moments.

Pending order


The promising RTK Mission Master was first shown two years ago. Then, specialists and the public were shown a universal chassis and several options for the target load for it. To date, all this technique has been tested at different sites, and in addition, new samples of a different purpose have joined it.



However, the Mission Master RTK has not yet been launched into the series. This system attracts attention and becomes a topic for discussion, but contracts for the supply of finished samples are not yet available. Apparently, potential customers are not yet ready to acquire and put into service such a complex - with all its advantages.

The advantages and positive qualities of RTK Mission Master and others like him are obvious. Such equipment in the transport configuration is able to follow the fighters and transport their supplies, weapon or equipment, simplifying the passage of the route and the solution of a combat mission. RTK with surveillance systems allows reconnaissance with minimal risks, and the combat vehicle is able to support infantry with fire or even independently solve all firing tasks.

However, this technique has certain disadvantages. First of all, this is a high degree of novelty, which requires long-term refinement in order to eliminate possible risks. In addition, for the operation of the RTK under the control of the operator, stable radio communication is required, due to which the enemy’s electronic warfare equipment becomes a serious threat. The defeat of the enemy’s RTC by enemy fire can lead to the loss of ammunition and other “baggage” or to the impossibility of fire support in difficult conditions.



However, when solving all technical issues and properly organizing the use of the RTK, the Mission Master in any configuration can make a significant contribution to the solution of various combat missions. This suggests that the modular complex from Rheinmetall will still be of interest to customers and will be able to go into the series.

The absence of contracts at the moment can not be considered a definite problem. In the current environment, the company-developer gets the opportunity without haste to carry out all development work and bring to the market a full-fledged and ready-made military product. In addition, the development of the modular RTK idea may be developed, and in the future, new versions of the Mission Master for other missions and operations will appear. And the future customer will be able to get a robotic complex with more features.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. xax
    +1
    1 July 2019 07: 40
    The chassis is very similar to the Canadian ARGO all-terrain vehicle.
    Canadians can still throw goose wheels on wheels and hook on a trailer.
    I have no idea what happened with the Germans, but the Canadian "argoshka" is a tub on wheels with very good maneuverability, simple, reliable, and quite maintainable. The only negative is the carrying capacity.
    1. -3
      18 August 2019 05: 56
      It is not clear how they solved the problem of drive on wheels. On Argo it is chain. On the old 2R-50 on the new 1 R-60. This is the pain point of all-terrain vehicles. Requiring continuous lubrication and attention. Is this drive system unclear? IF THE CHAINS ARE STANDING THAT IT'S JAM. A large weight pulls the chains in an instant. But the concept itself is correct. In the army, a car like Argo would be in demand as a cheap, very cheap way to transport small cargo units operating in its composition. Moreover, she swims.
  2. +2
    1 July 2019 09: 44
    From RTK Mission Master it can turn out not a bad all-terrain vehicle for fishing / hunting. It is not clear with the dimensions, and so it looks not bad. The only thing that "confuses" me is his tread wheels mounted backwards or is it wrong because of the photo? what
    1. +2
      1 July 2019 14: 56
      Quote: K-50
      ... wheels mounted tread backwards:

      hi .... He so rakes better smile
      ... In the next advertising video, the work of the new combat modification Mission Master, which received rocket weapons, was demonstrated.
    2. 0
      2 July 2019 12: 10
      I mean it can happen? look at https://tinger.ru/model/ everything turned out a long time ago. :) And I think these are not the only manufacturers of something similar.
  3. +4
    1 July 2019 17: 42
    Scout with retractable mast - this is interesting. Instead of aerial reconnaissance. It is not so easy to get into the mast from small arms, and the video cameras on it with a large zoom and real-time transmission of information are help to the company commander.
  4. sen
    +1
    2 July 2019 07: 12
    A beautiful robotic complex, but for delivery to the front line of ammunition, etc., under enemy fire, you need a low and armored one.
    1. +1
      2 July 2019 12: 07
      It is not necessary, just for this to make it possible to put mounted armor at an angle using various light elements. And in height - much lower then, look at the illustration next to people, robots in the floor of growth, which means somewhere a meter of height. Below, it will already be extremely hemorrhoidal, passable and with very narrow capabilities.
      1. sen
        +1
        2 July 2019 17: 05
        The lower, the more likely to survive. The caterpillar allows you to do this. There are quite a few low robots on tracks and with good cross. And the armor should not be mounted, but bearing.
        1. 0
          2 July 2019 17: 56
          I do not agree. Show at least one model significantly lower than a meter, with cross-country ability, carrying capacity comparable to these samples. I’ve seen small ones, they don’t have any cross, the presence of tracks is not a guarantee of cross at all. Especially with a small mass.
          Armor, of course, should not be a carrier, but only mounted. Because ONLY mounted armor can be configured for specific tasks and optimize security / load. And only hinged armor can make it possible to use complexes without armor at all, where it is not required. You suggest initially increasing the mass of the machine without any possibility of changing this. You read the article - these machines are universal, there is only 1 view for direct contact, the rest either for working at a distance or without any fire presence.
          1. sen
            +1
            3 July 2019 06: 42
            I talked about a specialized conveyor robot - to work at the forefront, so that carrying armor is required.
            In height somewhere Talon UGV, TALON SWORDS, Milrem THeMIS without combat modules.
            http://38niii.ru/analitika/52-boevye-roboty.html
            http://ucrazy.ru/interesting/1290621467-boevyeplatformytalonswordsimaars.html
            https://topwar.ru/154672-protivotankovyj-robot-mbda-milrem-anti-tank-ugv.html

            But better two-link, articulated robot with wide tracks.
            It could also transport a heavy machine gun with ammunition or several sets of "Bumblebees".
            1. -1
              3 July 2019 08: 39
              Quote: sen
              I talked about a specialized conveyor robot - to work at the forefront, so that carrying armor is required.

              Of course not. Because today he is at the forefront, tomorrow not at the forefront, the day after tomorrow he was replaced by a module and he began to perform the third or fourth functions. The platform should be one, for versatility.
              As for the robots that you brought, I thought something like this - this is generally nothing, as I wrote in another post - a cannon on wheels. Such can’t be conveyors, there the load and opportunities are minimal. Patency is also no. No serious equipment can be installed. They are highly specialized.
              1. sen
                +1
                3 July 2019 10: 29
                Of course not. Because today he is at the forefront, tomorrow not at the forefront, the day after tomorrow he was replaced by a module and he began to perform the third or fourth functions. The platform should be one, for versatility.

                It will not, because, as I said, we are talking about a specialized sample.
                As for the robots that you brought, I thought something like this - this is generally nothing, as I wrote in another post - a cannon on wheels. Such can’t be conveyors, there the load and opportunities are minimal. Patency is also no. No serious equipment can be installed. They are highly specialized.
                .
                Unproven.
                1. -1
                  3 July 2019 11: 30
                  Quote: sen
                  It will not, because, as I said, we are talking about a specialized sample.

                  About what specialized, you wrote about the delivery of ammunition, that is, the so-called mule. That is, it will either be universal or will not be any. There are no specialized ammunition for delivery under fire and will never be. Actually this is shown by ABSOLUTELY all manufacturers. Platforms are universal. For some reason, large and wealthy firms understand. What is it to bring the model to the market for orders, and why the universal platform is important, and you are not.
                  Quote: sen
                  Unproven.

                  Yah? The old song begins - no matter what you say, I ran into my idea and do not want to know anything. Have you at least a little understanding of technology? I see that no. Those models that you showed do not have any off-road qualities, not a single one at all. Neither sufficient clearance, nor suspension, which can go around the relief while maintaining stability, have no size whatsoever to overcome the simplest obstacles. Even the ordinary track on a broken rural road for small robots will be a serious obstacle and they certainly will not be able to overcome it without losing their goal. They have no normal mass to push their way. They are intended only for flat surfaces and caterpillars is not an indicator of patency at all.
            2. sen
              +1
              4 July 2019 13: 09
              Milrem THeMIS without combat modules.
              https://topwar.ru/154672-protivotankovyj-robot-mbda-milrem-anti-tank-ugv.html

              "The Milrem THeMIS chassis without payload has a length of 2,4 m, a width of 2 m and a height of 1,11 m. The ground clearance is up to 60 cm. The unladen weight is 1450 kg, the payload is 750 kg. The machine reaches speeds of up to 20 km / h. . Travel range and range depend on various parameters. "
  5. 0
    2 July 2019 12: 21
    I recall the argument with one person, I don’t remember the nickname, it was six months ago, then there was a discussion of our Uranus. Man believed that such robots should be small, literally the barrel on wheels. No arguments about the cross-country ability, review and capabilities did not bother him.
    I talked about something less than Uranus, but with a similar concept. And as I see the development of most companies just in this direction, which is logical.
    And also at the expense of management. Use it remotely. Although partial automation, at least for the same mules, is not a problem at all, and will probably be used in the further promotion of the project.
  6. +1
    3 July 2019 20: 02
    potential customers are not yet ready to purchase and put into service a similar complex


    In other words, the failure is the same as the Russian counterpart.