Airborne Detective Brand Birkier

43
Working on a cycle "Weapons of the Second World", sometimes you shovel so much information that willy-nilly pulls to write more widely about any moment. As, for example, it turned out with history Mark Birquier and his guns HS.404.

Airborne Detective Brand Birkier




In my articles on artillery, I somehow allowed myself the idea that in every gun you can open a detective story. There will be one more bondian, with all the essential attributes.

But let's start with the main character.

Mark, originally Birkigt. He was born in Switzerland, studied there, served, and when it came time to get involved in business, things didn’t happen for Birkigt in his native country. And he went to Gaster to Spain. Well, there was simply nothing closer at the beginning of the 20 century.

In Spain, Birkgit was engaged in frank trifles such as designing cars and in passing came up with a driveshaft as a way to transfer torque from the engine to the wheels. Before him, Daimler and Benz used a chain drive in Mercedes.

And in 1904, the company La Hispano-Suiza Fabrica de Automoviles SA was founded in Barcelona, ​​which means the Spanish-Spanish car factory, where Mark Birkigt served as CEO and Chief Designer.

And there is no whole life to be engaged in cars, to become known as the same Daimler, Benz, Porsche, Citroen ... Birkgta suffered further. Forward and upward.

Everything was so strange, but in 1914 he began to study aviation engines. Moreover, Birkigt designs just a miracle miraculous - a 8-horsepower water-cooled Hispano-Suiza V140 eight-cylinder aircraft engine.



What can compare this motor? Well, something like a Colt 1911 pistol of the year, a Mosin rifle, a Maxim machine gun. Classic for ages.

Just think of the numbers: the Birgtta company in World War I released more than 50 000 of these engines. The entire Entente flew on the engine, the HS-V8 was released under license in France, Great Britain, USA, Italy, Russia and Japan.

It was after the war that the figure of a flying stork appeared on Birkyta’s cars - part-time the emblem of the famous French fighter squadron "Cigogne" (Stork).



Agree, the engines would be rubbish - the pilots would hardly be so generous.






By the way, Rene Fonck, the best ace of France in the First World War


And then there were two more masterpieces. In the middle of the 30-ies, the Hispano-Suiza launched the twelve-cylinder HS-12Y aircraft engine, which had a Hispano-Suiza HS.404 automatic cannon in the collapse of the cylinders.



The gun Hispano-Suiza Moteur Cannon fired, as is clear from the photo, not through the propeller blades, but through the hollow shaft, on which, in fact, the screw was attached. This solution has simplified many things, eliminating the need to install synchronizers.



This was welcomed by many countries. Let's not go far, here is the very HS-12Y.



And here is our VK-105PF.



See the difference? So I did not see either. Only, instead of 404, we have ShVAK.

In short, the engine with a gun like a lot. And the money for the development of the license issue flowed not even the river into the pocket of a talented engineer.

But an unforeseen circumstance happened. In 1936, a civil war began in Spain. And not knowing how the circumstances would be, Birkigt decided to leave the hot Catalonia and moved to France.

So Birkigt became Birky in the French way. And he continued to do the same, that is, to produce aircraft engines and guns. And "Hispano-Suiza" gradually began even to crowd on the market "Oerlikon". Affinity, good business, but not in business, is not it?

But Burkier, fired by the fire of civil war, did not focus on France and began a friendship with the British, who liked the Oerlikon more than the gun of Hispano-Suiza.

Why not? Well, do not put ShVAK on the "Spitfire", right? And Birquier (let us call him that for the time being) begins work with the British. In the city of Grantham, the British Manufacture and Research Company (BMARC) was established, in fact a subsidiary of Hispano-Suiza. BMARC has been producing the Hispano-Suiza air cannon for more than 20.



While the British were building a factory, they were setting up production and everything else, caught fire in France. Moreover, caught fire in full.

In the year 1937, enterprising gentlemen in the French government had a good idea of ​​nationalization. Indeed, why are there some private traders doing business in the army? And, especially, not their own, but the new ones. And gentlemen began to nationalize all the enterprises that worked with the military department.

Marc Birquier and his company, Hispano-Suiza, flew all the way into this show and, quite expectedly, suffered under the full program. The company's factory in Bois Colombes was nationalized, as were all the Birkye’s prototypes and designs confiscated.

In 1938, Birkyer and Hispano-Suiza declared bankruptcy, and the next part of the show began.

Birkyt again became Birkigt, everything that could have been evacuated from France, moved to his homeland in Switzerland, where he founded the new enterprise Hispano-Suiza (Suisse) SA

In France, they rubbed their hands, anticipating profits and dividends from confiscations and nationalizations. All the development of Mark Birquier was transferred to the state arsenal of Chatellerault ("Manufacture d'Armes de Châtellerault"), where military clever men were going to complete the development on their own, introduce them into the series and launch the production of new guns.

The problems began immediately after it became clear that Birkigt was by no means a fool, and brought everything he could. And he could much, plus the main thing - his head. The French expected a complete fiasco, because it was not enough that they could not arrange a timely release weapons on contracts already concluded, so that it was released, it was impossible to get documentary support.

In Chatellerault, one gun after another was removed from the agenda. By and large, the French were able to keep up to date with only the release of HS.404. The turret version of the HS.405 and 23-mm guns HS.406 and HS.407 to the beginning of 1939, existed only in single copies. Looking ahead, it is worth saying that these guns were never mastered by the French, and only 404 remained in their arsenal.

Meanwhile, Birkigt in Switzerland gradually recovered from the blow inflicted by the French, and was setting up the release of guns at the same time in Switzerland and the UK. There were problems, but a completely different plan.

The situation was simply wonderful: in France there was a streamlined production without the slightest chance of further modernization and development, in Switzerland the revived Ispano-Suiza offered to potential customers both cannons and all the relevant documentation. Somewhat worse was the production.

In general, many countries that bought a license for the production of HS.404 were put in a rather ugly situation, because, for example, in the case of the USA, the purchased license implied signing a contract with the French side, which was not able to provide technical support for the products being sold.

It can even be called a revenge on the part of Birkje, but - nothing personal, right?



And then the Second World War began, and France was not as such. The war naturally divided Switzerland and Great Britain, trapped in different camps.

But the British had problems with the 404 produced. Big problems. But the guns needed more and more, and the BMARC plant seemed to be coping with the volumes, but the quality of the guns was (according to the British) unacceptable.

The British military even went on an unprecedented step - agreed to supply the US under the lend-lease licensed HS.404. And after the first set party, the British realized that their guns were quite normal for themselves.

In the USA, they didn’t cry much, and, promptly returning the party, they installed them on the Air Cobras and shuffled to the Soviet Union. Those were the worst cannons from Oldsmobil, about which quite a lot was written and not a word was good.

And the British went with the shaft cannon "Hurricane" (well, it was necessary to somehow make this coffin competitive) and "Spitfire". There was a battle for Britain, and the guns were very much in demand.



And here the gentlemen from the British intelligence intervened. Swiss residents came to Mark Birkigt and tried to explain that British gentlemen and sirs are asking to help them with guns. In Britain, the right to private and intellectual property is respected, not only in France, but nevertheless, they can also be understood.

Birkigt understood. Therefore, without much thought, he agreed to help. It is unlikely that "Hispano-Suiza" and he himself would safely have suffered another confiscation of the plant.

In general, Birkigt agreed to a business trip to Britain. But there was a small problem. This is the intelligence of Germany, which also knew how to work, and would easily have buried Birkigt, learn about his plans.

Something that the Germans knew how.

Birkigt's journey from Switzerland to Portugal took 3 by air for a day. Yes, a bit too much, but there was a war in Europe, so even the neutrals had a hard time. With the help of the Swedish airline BOAC Birkigt flew from Switzerland through Austria and France to Portugal.

And in Portugal, more precisely, not far from the Portuguese coast, an English submarine waited for Birkigt.

And the only way he managed to get into the UK. But what can you not do for the sake of business ...

The result of the trip was the HS.404 cannon, brought to mind, which is also Hispano Mark II, which became if not the best gun of that war, then the most massive one. And then more than 20 years stood in service with the UK as an aviation and anti-aircraft gun.

Unfortunately, there is absolutely no indication of how and when Birkigt returned.

The Second World War buried the automotive business of Birkigt, and he completely switched to aviation.


Mark Birkigt with his wife and friends behind the wheel, of course, "Hispano-Suiza"


And the brand "Hispano Suiza" exists today. True, in a very piquant form. As purchased by the Swiss company Oerlikon, which, in turn, is part of the concern Rheinmetall Borsig.

In general, one can only wonder how yesterday's enemies can become allies, and friends and allies can quite well rob you.

Apparently, Mark Birkigt had such karma. That, however, did not prevent him from making history as one of the representatives of engineering geniuses.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    8 June 2019 18: 46
    Well done man! And to all lovers of "take away and divide", incl. Every Latin American, and not only leftists, must always remember that nationalization has never and nowhere led to any good.
    1. +7
      8 June 2019 19: 18
      This is how to manage. When the normal staff - and the "national office" will plow as expected. A former classmate of mine lives in France and says that their state company for providing electrical services is quite normal. And the opposite examples, so they are a dime a dozen throughout Russia.
      1. -7
        8 June 2019 20: 07
        National or nationalized? If it was created by the state, without taking it away from anyone, this is a slightly different matter, and anyway, as a rule, it is much less effective.
    2. -4
      8 June 2019 19: 33
      Yeah. Especially revolutionary nationalization of industry in old Russia.
      1. -11
        8 June 2019 19: 40
        Exactly, a great example. God only knows how many decades this criminal Bolshevik nationalization was thrown back by Russia.
        1. +9
          8 June 2019 19: 40
          And this God is you, as I understand it?
          1. -10
            8 June 2019 19: 53
            What about me?
            I’m just a warm-hearted person who is offended by the power.
            1. +7
              8 June 2019 20: 13
              Is it a shame when we treat children through SMS?
        2. +6
          9 June 2019 07: 45
          Exactly, a great example. God only knows how many decades this criminal Bolshevik nationalization was thrown back by Russia.

          So I rejected that you’ve been living on its remnants for 28 years, but something private business you shows one fig of mother Russia good
    3. +2
      8 June 2019 23: 35
      The system works best in which losses and risks are nationalized and profits are privatized.
      1. +1
        9 June 2019 07: 26
        It was a joke actually.
        1. Alf
          +1
          9 June 2019 16: 18
          Quote: Narak-zempo
          It was a joke actually.

          You should at least add a smiley, otherwise I barely managed to grab myself by the hand with a minus.
          1. +1
            9 June 2019 21: 48
            Quote: Alf
            Would you even add a smiley face

            Yes, it was interesting how many people plyusanet seriously
      2. +2
        9 June 2019 18: 30
        Yes, for a few particularly fat bourgeois. This is the best way to take away all the money from the population, except for scarce food and clothing.
    4. +2
      9 June 2019 07: 50
      Quote: Sergey Sergeev_4
      Well done man! And to all lovers of "take away and divide", incl. Every Latin American, and not only leftists, must always remember that nationalization has never and nowhere led to any good.

      The example is illustrative, but its applicability is limited. It is true only in the first generation, when the owner of the company, he is its founding father, is the main generator of ideas.
      But over time, the company is inherited or sold, and the new owners, in the end, turn out to be just owners who just want to make a profit. At the same time, sometimes a bolt is put on real development and innovations that require costs, and sometimes the developers start to freak out to the detriment of the end user, especially if the market is monopolized and it will not go anywhere. Do you, for example, use Skype? How do you like the eighth version? So at this stage, both R&D specialists and managers, with the exception of the tops, are simply hired workers, and they don't care who exactly pays the salary. And if the production of an enterprise is important, its nationalization is fully justified in order to reorient it from maximizing profit to the quality of this very product.
      1. Alf
        +1
        9 June 2019 16: 20
        Quote: Narak-zempo
        And if the company's products are important, its nationalization is justified in order to reorient it from maximizing profits to the quality of these products.

        And in order for the employees to work "tasty", you can pay them a percentage of the profit, albeit not large, but constant. But only to ALL employees, not just the top.
    5. 0
      10 June 2019 09: 19
      Yah ? And who owns Renault now? I once went to Clio. I had no complaints against her, rather she had to me.
      1. +1
        10 June 2019 12: 14
        Quote: sivuch
        And who owns Renault now?

        The surviving one of Renault’s two brothers (like Henry Ford) took ideas and even became Schiklgruber’s great friend. Especially the fact that after the (victorious for the Reich) war, a popular car (VW) will be in great demand. After the deserter de Gaulle came back from England (with a bunch of supporters) in France, only motivated French communists remained his political non-opponents. Due to the difficult economic situation and France’s lack of grandeur, Renault's factories were nationalized, and Renault itself was quietly beaten in prison (maybe for collaboration, or maybe in order to save budget funds).
        1. +1
          10 June 2019 12: 22
          So I mean that the nationalized Renault quite successfully competes with private firms
        2. 0
          18 June 2019 15: 10
          That is, it must be understood that the ideas of Mr. Schicklgruber are closer to the gentlemen of the libertarians than, for example, gallism?
          1. +1
            5 August 2019 20: 07
            Naturally!
  2. 0
    8 June 2019 19: 43
    Wonderful article. The topic is not beaten and easy to read.
    There was a time when people, with their creative genius, entered their name in history, and at the same time earned a solid fortune. And now there are such?
    I don’t even know, but by ear they are only masters of trade. However, I may be mistaken because of my ignorance in this topic.
  3. +1
    8 June 2019 19: 51
    There is a version that the reason for the nationalization in 1937 of the French branch of Hispano-Suiza was the accusation of Mark Birkier of selling the USSR HS-407 bypassing the ban on sales of military developments.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +1
    8 June 2019 22: 43
    Very Interesting and Informative Article, well illustrated (I have never seen any of these detailed photographs, except perhaps, the famous stork-in the drawings in the automobile museum of the magazine "Tekhnika-Molodezhi", the beginning of the 70s-publications of Yuri Dolmatovsky about elegant and beautiful cars " Hispano-Suiza "and in the Polish magazine" Mali Model "- on board a model of the Nieuport-17 biplane fighter of this French squadron winked )!
    I thank the respected Author, Roman Skomorokhov, for a series of "machine gun and cannon stories" and for this Article, especially! good
  6. 0
    8 June 2019 23: 42
    In general, one can only wonder how yesterday's enemies can become allies, and friends and allies can quite well rob you.
    God works in mysterious ways. And the article is interesting. Thanks, author.
  7. 0
    9 June 2019 07: 12
    In France then a lot of things were nationalized.
    And the working week was reduced.
    Socialists, however.
    But, in terms of the country's defense, it hit hard.
    As for which form of ownership is more effective, according to competent Western experts, options are possible.
    For small industries it is uniquely private.
    For large, the form of ownership does not matter. Management efficiency does not depend on this.
    1. -2
      9 June 2019 11: 17
      State-owned firms are effective for short periods. But then surely
      move out into the swamp of bureaucracy and production stagnation.
      Large private firms, on the contrary, have periods of stagnation, but in general they
      they recover from stagnation and are reorganized quickly.
      Israel, in particular, for 50 years smoothly moved from state capitalism
      (semi-socialism) in large industry to almost
      full private capitalism. The process is not completed and continues.
      And there is no disappointment.
      1. 0
        9 June 2019 18: 32
        Is Israel a classic example of the economy?
    2. Alf
      0
      9 June 2019 16: 23
      Quote: ignoto
      For small industries it is uniquely private.

      Moreover, such industries that work for the immediate needs of people, as they say "watches and cowards". But even here it is necessary to strictly monitor that incomes from bottom to top do not differ in a strictly specified number of times.
    3. +1
      9 June 2019 18: 35
      For some reason, in the USSR, 100% state ownership of the defense industry also hit hard. But for Germany and its satellites. Private property did not help them, despite the advantage in rabsil and machine tools.
      1. 0
        10 June 2019 08: 41
        And by the end of the USSR, it hit the USSR. Depriving the population of commonplace things - TV, Video, clothes, batteries, a normal range of agricultural products and food. In what is needed the State property, and in what is harmful.
        1. Alf
          +1
          10 June 2019 19: 31
          Quote: Zaurbek
          And by the end of the USSR, it hit the USSR.

          Thanks to the khrushch who zealously undertook to eradicate other types of property in the USSR
  8. +1
    9 June 2019 11: 46
    An interesting and talented person was the basis of the article ... I read about his invention of the cardan for the first time, well, I did not know ... like the fact that he was the first to suggest putting weapons in the collapse of the cylinders ... and of course, the not so common talent of an inventor and businessman in one "bottle"
  9. -1
    9 June 2019 13: 52
    Read. I was surprised. It turns out that in England there were no engineers to improve the gun (as I understand it, all the necessary documentation was). Something somehow I do not believe. The USSR took and made MP-105 (107). But the British dragged the hero of the article across Europe to improve his brainchild ...
    1. 0
      9 June 2019 14: 16
      Well, each result is corresponding.
    2. Alf
      +1
      9 June 2019 16: 27
      Quote: lexseyOGK
      It turns out that in England there were no engineers to improve the gun (as I understand it, all the necessary documentation was). Something somehow I do not believe. The USSR took and made MP-105 (107).

      The business is that the USSR bought the motor completely, with documentation, machines, tools. But to improve the product "without family, without tribe" usually turns out to be very bad.
      1. 0
        9 June 2019 19: 11
        And how did the "ignorant and unmotivated communists" do it? And for the enlightened pedantic private traders in France and England - through a stump-deck?
        1. Alf
          0
          9 June 2019 22: 05
          Quote: meandr51
          And how did the "ignorant and unmotivated communists" do it?

          Very simple-bloody Beria for all shot in batches, but hunting is something to live for. laughing
          1. Alf
            0
            10 June 2019 17: 56
            Quote: Alf
            Quote: meandr51
            And how did the "ignorant and unmotivated communists" do it?

            Very simple-bloody Beria for all shot in batches, but hunting is something to live for. laughing

            Judging by the minus, an admirer of Solzhenitsin ran in.
  10. 0
    9 June 2019 17: 26
    With the help of the Swedish airline WOAS ...

    But isn't BOAC British Overseas Airways Corporation?
  11. 0
    9 June 2019 17: 41
    And the brand "Hispano Suiza" exists today. True, in a very piquant form. As purchased by the Swiss company Oerlikon, which, in turn, is part of the concern Rheinmetall Borsig.

    Interestingly, another part of Oerlikon, Oerlikon Solar, was controlled by Victor Vekselberg in the 2000s. This company is developing solar panels. Until 2014, a plant in Novocheboksarsk worked on its technologies.
  12. +1
    10 June 2019 12: 42
    See the difference? So I did not see either. Only, instead of 404, we have ShVAK.

    But I saw a lot of differences. Motors in the photo have the same camber angle and the shape of the valve covers. The rest is different. The shaft is different, the front cover is different, the cooling system is not very close, up to the holes in the blocks in different places, the outlet is also different, the inlet is not visible in the photo, but it is completely different. So, kinship is not very visible even without looking inside.
    1. 0
      10 June 2019 16: 44
      To see the difference and similarity, you must be in the subject. ))) Starting with the fact that on one photo the engine is bare, and on the other the propulsion system with all attachments, including the breather tank.
      But family ties, of course, can be found in these photos.