Bold plans: Raytheon's laser anti-missile defense missile defense

23
The list of products of the American company Raytheon has systems of different classes, and it intends to master fundamentally new directions. Recently, the company talked about its desire to develop a new version of the laser missile defense system, capable of fighting even hypersonic aircraft. However, Raytheon recognizes that the solution to this problem will be extremely difficult.

"The next flight to the moon"


In recent months, articles on The Next Moonshots series “Next Moon Trips” have been published on the official website of Raytheon. They describe the company's future plans related to advanced technologies and fundamentally new developments. The creation of such systems is extremely complex, which is why they are compared with the American lunar program of the past.



Bold plans: Raytheon's laser anti-missile defense missile defense


The new material of the series is devoted to laser missile defense systems. Such systems are already being created and tested, but their developers face new challenges. Russia and China announced the emergence of promising hypersonic impact aircraft. The United States needs protection against such threats, and Raytheon should create it.

Creating a "hypersonic" laser missile defense is a particularly difficult task and requires the creation of new devices and technologies. It is necessary to solve a number of fundamentally important issues, without which the defeat of a hypersonic aircraft will be impossible. That is why such a missile defense is compared in complexity with the flight to the moon.

As an illustration of the material about the new direction led advertising video, published last fall. It demonstrated how compact laser complexes hit unguided missiles, UAVs and even a helicopter. However, this video is not directly related to the planned work and only demonstrates the general principles of dealing with air targets.

Problems and tasks


Although a promising project is similar to existing ones, its creation is associated with certain difficulties. So, modern combat lasers can literally burn unmanned aircraft. However, a much larger "number of photons" is required to hit a ballistic missile. Thus, we need some powerful sources of energy and radiation.

The laser complex needs special optical tools capable of withstanding high radiation power. Finally, all components of such a system must be placed on a suitable carrier.

This kind of missile defense system may face visibility issues. The laser beam does not bend, and therefore the range of "shooting" is physically limited by the horizon. This can reduce the maximum possible range of targets. The solution could be the placement of the laser on the spacecraft. "Fighting satellite" has advantages, but differs in complexity and high cost.



Raytheon believes that the emergence of an effective laser missile defense system can become a deterrent in the field of nuclear weapons. If the US gets a system that can deal with the enemy’s nuclear missiles with minimal effort and expenditure, the latter is unlikely to invest in its development.

Difficulties in the way


A recent article from Raytheon is of particular interest. It, at a minimum, demonstrates the desire of this company to continue the development of laser technology, including with the aim of creating means of protection against fundamentally new weapons. However, so far there is no reason to believe that Raytheon was able to move in this direction further than preliminary discussions and the search for basic solutions. Moreover, the interception of hypersonic shock LA is not even present in promotional materials.

However, Raytheon is already building and testing laser systems capable of tracking and hitting air targets. In the future, such products may be used in air defense and "traditional" missile defense. On the basis of such complexes and their technologies, it is theoretically possible to create even more developed systems capable of intercepting fundamentally new targets.

The published article lists the main difficulties encountered when creating combat lasers for air defense and missile defense. An energy source and a radiation source of sufficient power, as well as optical systems and controls are required. In the context of the fight against hypersonic aircraft, all these problems are exacerbated, and are also complemented by several characteristic difficulties.

The main factor determining the fighting qualities of a hypersonic shock system is the high speed of the aircraft. It is able to travel great distances in the shortest time, which reduces the time for the reaction from the air defense missile defense. In addition, the tracking and tracking of the target is complicated with the subsequent issuance of target designation to firing means. All this places special demands on both the detection means from the air defense and missile defense, as well as the control systems of the anti-aircraft complex.

In order to destroy an aircraft, a combat laser must transfer a certain energy to it, and difficulties also arise in this area. The first is the difficulty of pointing the laser beam at a fast-moving object and holding it for the required time. To solve such a problem, advanced means of tracking and controlling a combat laser are required. The second problem is also related to the flight characteristics of the hypersonic system. Such an aircraft is capable of unpredictable maneuvering, and laser missile defense is obliged to respond to its actions, while maintaining the tip.



The following difficulty is present in the context of energy transfer. Hypersonic aircraft must have a developed thermal protection. The laser for his defeat should be powerful enough to "penetrate" such protection. In-flight heat protection is subject to high loads, but this slightly simplifies the operation of the laser. It also depends on the laser power whether the missile defense system will have time to hit the target before it leaves the zone of responsibility.

The need to create highly effective means of detection and a powerful laser emitter adversely affects the size and mobility of the entire complex. It also turns out to be extremely difficult to manufacture and operate. However, considerable cost and considerable size are a standard problem of all existing combat lasers capable of developing the required power.

Bold plans


From a recent Raytheon article, only two main conclusions can be made. The first, one of the leading American arms manufacturers, is considering the possibility of creating new anti-aircraft and anti-missile defense systems that meet the challenges of the near future. The second conclusion is that in “Raytheon” they perfectly understand how difficult the implementation of such plans will be, and also represent what tasks will have to be solved for this.

It is curious that in parallel, Raytheon will work on the proper hypersonic impact aircraft. In particular, a few months ago in the “The Next Moonshots” column a corresponding article was published. It can be assumed that the simultaneous development of promising aircraft and means of dealing with them to some extent will facilitate obtaining the desired results in both directions.

In his article "Raytheon" directly mentions the latest developments of Russia and China. Indeed, the United States regards these countries as potential adversaries and acts accordingly. Russian and Chinese military and engineers need to consider American statements and draw the necessary conclusions. At the moment, hypersonic shock systems are invulnerable to the US defense systems, but the situation may change in the future.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    24 May 2019 05: 31
    A hypersonic warhead is flying in the atmosphere in a plasma cloud. How will the laser pierce this cloud? Well, okay, let's say it breaks through ... The optical properties of plasma are different. We take a glass half full of water, throw a pencil, look from the side. What do we have? The pencil has become "broken". Here is such a pun, you understand laughing
    1. +2
      24 May 2019 06: 14
      laser on "hypersound" really boldly ... (freeze for a second, I'll take aim ...))))
    2. +1
      24 May 2019 09: 18
      Quote: Karabas
      A hypersonic warhead in the atmosphere in a plasma cloud flies. How does this cloud break the laser?

      The concentration of electrons in the aforementioned plasma cloud is less than the plasma cutoff frequency for the applied lasers of the optical and even IR ranges. Therefore, the plasma cloud is transparent to the Peresvet laser beam.
      1. -1
        24 May 2019 09: 58
        The concentration of electrons in the aforementioned plasma cloud is less than the plasma cutoff frequency for the applied lasers of the optical and even IR ranges. Therefore, the plasma cloud is transparent to the Peresvet laser beam.

        How clever at first glance laughing It doesn’t matter that rubbish, the main impression is to make and briefly describe the scientific tolmuds. The laser beam scatters the plasma. Here is an article, check out http://journals.ioffe.ru/articles/viewPDF/38867
        1. +1
          24 May 2019 10: 58
          Quote: Karabas
          Here is an article, check out http://journals.ioffe.ru/articles/viewPDF/38867

          From fig. 3 of the article you mentioned shows that even at almost atmospheric pressure of 750 Torr the maximum scattering angle is 6 ... 8 degrees.
          The thickness h of a plasma cloud around a hypersonic target, for example, at a speed of 10 Mach, is h = Vsound / V rockets * L ~ = 330/3300 * 3 = 0.3 meters, where L = 3 meters is the length of the rocket. At a thickness h = 0.3 meters with a scattering angle of teta = 8 degrees, the deviation of the laser beam dR will be
          dR = h * teta = 0.3 * 8 * 3.14 / 180 = 0.04 meters. So you are talking about scattering. Those. scattering of the laser beam in the plasma cloud around the hypersonic rocket can be neglected; it is too small to have any diminishing effect on the energy and power of the laser beam on the target.
          1. 0
            28 August 2019 11: 39
            From Fig. 3 it follows that at a scattering angle of 6 degrees, the dissipated power exceeds 200 kW.
            The thickness h of a plasma cloud around a hypersonic target, for example, at a speed of 10 Mach, is h = Vsound / V rockets * L ~ = 330/3300 * 3 = 0.3 meters, where L = 3 meters is the length of the rocket. At a thickness h = 0.3 meters with a scattering angle of teta = 8 degrees, the deviation of the laser beam dR will be
            dR =h*teta=0.3*8*3.14/180=0.04 метра.

            This is where you got it ??? belay
            Those. scattering of the laser beam in the plasma cloud around the hypersonic rocket can be neglected; it is too small to have any diminishing effect on the energy and power of the laser beam on the target.

            You can do anything. But physicists and engineers alas. Physical laws are not repealed by Wishlist and invention, many have tried, even the Pope somehow canceled gravity to Newton for evil, so as not to show off, then he was crushed by the roof laughing
      2. 0
        25 May 2019 23: 04
        Quote: Svetlana
        a plasma cloud is transparent to the Peresvet laser beam.

        do not mention Peresvet in vain ... Nobody has seen him yet in his eyes.
    3. 0
      24 May 2019 13: 05
      I don’t know, in my opinion, in the article, not relevant problems
      the hardest thing is not aiming speed at all
      You correctly indicated one of the problems, but there are a few more -
      adequate accuracy of target designation and guidance, state of the atmosphere, dubious opportunities for efficient energy transfer and focus retention
      and most importantly, economic efficiency. Even if all of a sudden succeeds, then at least approximately the installation turns out to be so complicated and expensive that it is much easier to stamp GLA.
      It seems to me that the way of Soviet designers who immediately thought about covering the area \ volume is much more practical.
      Yes, even the ancient banal anti-aircraft shrapnel shell, successfully exploded in the path of the GLA, will have a much greater chance of hitting than a laser.
  2. +1
    24 May 2019 05: 43
    Cyril, give a link to the article, otherwise there’s a somewhat chaotic description for you, see, translation difficulties. ..
    1. 0
      24 May 2019 06: 15
      Quote: Thrifty
      Raytheon Co. / raytheon.com

      Well, so below, under the author.Raytheon Co. / raytheon.com
      1. +1
        24 May 2019 07: 49
        Aerodrome hi - I do not notice, thanks! !! hi
  3. 0
    24 May 2019 09: 08
    I propose a two-stage version of the transfer of energy of beam weapons to the target.
    The first stage - ground-based active microwave headlamps with microwaves feed the drone’s power plant, designed to power an onboard laser.
    The second stage is an on-board laser of visible and / or infrared ranges with LED pumping, capable of aiming at hypersonic atmospheric and transatmospheric targets.
    Converting microwave radiation into direct current - by onboard rectennes located in the bottom of the drone. The efficiency of converting microwave radiation to direct current for rectenn can be more than 50%. The efficiency of converting AC energy ~ 380 Volts (or ~ 6kVolts, ~ 35kV, ~ 110kV, ~ 220kV, ~ 500kV, = 1150kVolt) to microwave radiation from AFAR can be more than 80%.
    For example, thermal airships, as well as multicopters, can be used as drones.
    The power plant of the UAV supplies energy to the onboard laser and electric motors of the propellers generating lift, or heats the gas in balloons in the case of unmanned airships.
    UAVs barrage at an altitude of ~ 20 km above the upper layer of tropospheric clouds, transparent to microwave radiation AFAR. And the flight paths of hypersonic targets lie at altitudes of more than 20 km, where there are practically no clouds (except for silver and pearl, which are extremely rare) and the laser beam of the second stage is not nearly susceptible to attenuation.
    1. 0
      25 May 2019 23: 16
      Quote: Svetlana
      I suggest ...

      Wow how many technoeres in one message ...
      you give a cheap and mobile Tokamak, maybe then there will be enough energy for this whole cascade of transformations and losses, and a couple percent of the original power will reach the target.
  4. -2
    24 May 2019 09: 43
    Raytheon is simply a nyash: any hypersonic device (planning or motor), by definition, flies in a cloud of plasma through which a laser beam of arbitrarily high power cannot pass - starting from a certain power threshold the laser will turn air into a plasma immediately after radiation into the air .

    Sawers of the American budget, our respect and respect laughing
    1. -1
      25 May 2019 14: 35
      Quote: Operator
      Raytheon is simply a nyash: any hypersonic device (planning or motor), by definition, flies in a cloud of plasma through which a laser beam of arbitrarily high power cannot pass - starting from a certain power threshold the laser will turn air into a plasma immediately after radiation into the air .

      Sawers of the American budget, our respect and respect laughing

      Above they wrote "even at almost atmospheric pressure of 750 torr, the maximum scattering angle is 6 ... 8 degrees.
      The thickness h of a plasma cloud around a hypersonic target, for example, at a speed of 10 Mach, is h = Vsound / V rockets * L ~ = 330/3300 * 3 = 0.3 meters, where L = 3 meters is the length of the rocket. At a thickness h = 0.3 meters with a scattering angle of teta = 8 degrees, the deviation of the laser beam dR will be
      dR = h * teta = 0.3 * 8 * 3.14 / 180 = 0.04 meters. So you are talking about nothing about dispersion. Those. the scattering of the laser beam in the plasma cloud around the hypersonic missile can be neglected, it is too small to have any diminishing effect on the energy and power of the laser beam on the target. "But you may not believe
      1. 0
        25 May 2019 15: 44
        Plasma is an ionized gas of negatively charged electrons and positively charged atomic nuclei with an incomplete set of electrons.

        The laser is scattered by several orders of magnitude more efficiently and absorbed by electrons than by neutrally charged gas molecules. Therefore, high-power laser weapons are inoperative in air — the beam itself ionizes the air and is itself scattered / absorbed by the ions.

        And so yes - believe in what you want (idolaters shaken before the West) laughing
        1. 0
          25 May 2019 16: 10
          Quote: Operator
          Plasma is an ionized gas of negatively charged electrons and positively charged atomic nuclei with an incomplete set of electrons.

          The laser is scattered by several orders of magnitude more efficiently and absorbed by electrons than by neutrally charged gas molecules. Therefore, high-power laser weapons are inoperative in air — the beam itself ionizes the air and is itself scattered / absorbed by the ions.

          And so yes - believe in what you want (idolaters shaken before the West) laughing

          So our overexposure is shit :( drank dough?: D
          1. 0
            25 May 2019 19: 19
            "Peresvet" is designed to disable the sensors of satellites that fly in space and not in the atmosphere. The best carrier for "Peresvet" is the Il-76DT.
  5. +1
    24 May 2019 09: 49
    This makes me happy. The task will require a fantastic amount of money, while carrots of an acceptable result will be practically unattainable at this stage of technology development.
    Here, the cheapest option will be the invention of a time machine in order to pre-position the damaging elements in the path of hyper-rockets. Or a disintegrator from fantastic sagas that instantly destroys atomic bonds at a given point in space.
    America - for the carrot march! We must cut down all sorts of welfers and other benefits-insurance! An exceptional homeland is in danger!
  6. 0
    24 May 2019 11: 34
    First you need to set up lasers to work at 5-10 km on subsonic
    and supersonic targets. When such a burn becomes the norm, then
    it will be possible to think about tens of kilometers in space.
    1. 0
      25 May 2019 23: 17
      so far - more than 3 km - this is impasible.
  7. +2
    24 May 2019 23: 09
    Quote: Karabas
    A hypersonic warhead is flying in the atmosphere in a plasma cloud. How will the laser pierce this cloud? Well, okay, let's say it breaks through ... The optical properties of plasma are different. We take a glass half full of water, throw a pencil, look from the side. What do we have? The pencil has become "broken". Here is such a pun, you understand laughing

    And sorry, what idiot will shoot a laser pulse at a warhead in the atmosphere when it goes in a fiery cocoon? The defeat of the warhead will occur in space. A little damage to the thermal barrier is enough for the plasma to do its job and the warhead to burn out in the atmosphere

    Quote: Aerodrome
    laser on "hypersound" really boldly ... (freeze for a second, I'll take aim ...))))

    Of course, boldly. When aiming, for example, occurs over 50 km from the laser, and the laser will be on the satellite. The beam will hit the target in 0,0004 seconds, and the block needs almost 7 seconds to cover this distance. How many times does the laser have time to shoot at the target ??? This is subject to 50 km. And if at 500?
    1. 0
      26 May 2019 19: 56
      Quote: Old26
      A little damage to the thermal barrier is enough for the plasma to do its job and the warhead to burn out in the atmosphere
      Not enough. The warhead is not Buran, there the evaporation of the coating is the norm.
      Quote: Old26
      How many times does the laser have time to shoot at the target ???
      Once: it needs to be cooled and pumped up again. This is not easy on earth.