Multiple Monsters

41
Practically from the very beginning of the appearance of the gunshot weapons the designers of many countries of the world tried to increase its rate of fire. The advantages of massive fire quickly became clear to the military of all countries. For a long time, the only way to increase the rate of fire of the weapon was to train the shooter himself. A well-trained soldier could make more shots per minute, in reality this could have an impact on the outcome of the entire battle. The second way to increase the rate of fire was a constructive change of weapons, and the simplest option was to increase the number of barrels.

It is worth noting that the idea of ​​increasing the number of trunks was simple, lay on the surface and became one of the first ways to increase the real rate of fire of firearms. In many countries of the world, designers created real multi-barreled monsters who could not replace a modern machine gun or machine gun, but definitely made an impression, at least with their appearance, like an 14 barrel gun created by the English gunsmith William Dupé at the dawn of the XIX century.



William Dupe's 14-Barrel Gun


English gunsmith William Dupé created firearms at the turn of the XIX century, some of his models have survived to this day, you can find sets of dueling pistols of this gunsmith on the Internet. However, the 14-barrel rifle, which today can be seen in the collection of the Museum of Weapons in Liege, is of the greatest interest. It is believed that the master made this unusual copy for the Colonel of the British Army Thomas Thornton around the turn of the 1800-year.

Multiple Monsters


A special feature of the gun was the presence of two blocks of trunks of seven pieces. Each of the 14 trunks had a caliber 12,5 mm. For weapons of the era of the domination of black powder and round bullets caliber was too small. The traditional army guns of those years had a caliber from 15,4 mm, while for serf guns it reached 25 mm. At the same time, a volley of a 14-barreled shotgun could be a powerful argument in any battle or dispute that needed to be resolved with a weapon. Most likely, the shooting from an unusual rifle was carried out with volleys, which made it possible to fire seven bullets per shot at the target. The effect for the enemy was monstrous, as was the expected return at the moment of the shot.

Weapons could hardly be called mobile, given the size and weight, which were supposed to be very impressive. It is difficult to understand for exactly what purposes such a weapon was needed by a colonel of the British army. In battle, weapons could be used only in specific conditions (in defense with strong walls or a suitable stop), it would be madness to hunt with them, if you do not take into account the case when a deer or other forest animals would not run out to the stance the hunter themselves. The original decisions of the gunsmith include the presence of a tactical grip, an advanced solution for its time. Without it, to keep the gun at the time of the shot, apparently, it was simply impossible.

English assault boarding guns


Separately, you can select multi-barrel guns, which were used during boarding fights. We all know the image of a pirate who has entrenched himself in the cinema. The screen character, preparing to attack the enemy ship, is armed with several pistols at once. In a world in which there were no multiply-charged weapons, this was the way out. Another solution was the multi-barrel model of guns, some of them most resembled a sawn-off shotgun.


Nok's seven-barreled sea gun


Known models of multi-barreled small arms of the era of the Napoleonic wars include the British naval seven-barreled shotgun. Known weapons received through a series of novels by the writer Bernard Cornwell, telling about the adventures of arrow Sharpe. The model was produced not too large series in the late XVIII - early XIX centuries. The design of the seven-barreled shotgun was developed by James Wilson, but the manufacture was carried out by the manufacturer Henry Nok, who gave his unusual model of firearms his name.

The weapon was a rather heavy (weight over 6 kg) musket with seven trunks and one flint lock. The rifle fired a volley, sending seven 13,2 mm caliber lead bullets at the enemy, the total weight of the volley was 170 grams. Such a volley literally swept opponents from the deck of an enemy ship. With all the shortcomings, to which they attributed not the most outstanding accuracy of shooting and a huge return from the shot, the weapon found its admirers. In a situation where targets hit on the deck of the ship, it was not so important. The disadvantages of weapons also referred to the complexity of the care and the duration of the recharge process, these problems were common to all samples of multi-weapon weapons of those years.

A multi-barreled rifle could be used when boarding an enemy ship, and as a anti-board weapon. There is also a version that an unusual rifle could be used by captains of British ships as a weighty argument when it was necessary to prevent a team’s riot. In any case, the British government bought approximately 600 of similar seven-barreled shotguns for the fleet.

Five-Barreled Gun



Five-Barreled Gun


Another sample of such boarding weapons is presented on the blog strangernn.livejournal.com. On the pages of the blog, the author talks about the assault rifle with five barrels. The main materials are wood and bronze. Multi-barreled weapons were made at about the same time frame as William Dupée's unusual 14 barrel gun. At the same time it is technologically easier. All five barrel bores were drilled in a large-sized bronze billet. This is the main difference of the model from previous models, where each trunk was separate.

With a fairly modest size, the mass of the five-barrel assault gun was 5,8 kg. At the same time, the weapon was significantly shorter than Knock's seven-barreled rifle, resembling modern trim. In combat, it was partly more convenient. When boarding fights was enough and a small length of the trunks, it was assumed that the shooter will do a volley almost point blank before jumping onto the deck and begin to fight with the enemy using cold weapons. In this regard, ballistics and accuracy should have been enough, at least one bullet would certainly have found its target.

Multiple PepperBox


Special mention deserve the multi-barreled pistols, which also appeared at the turn of the XVIII - XIX centuries. For them stuck the unusual name "peperboks". When literally translated from English, means "box with pepper" or simply "pepper". At first, the term was widely applied to all multiply-charged pistols, it was even used to designate the first revolvers. But first of all, the word describes a multi-barreled pistols, most of all resembling a revolver externally enlarged in size or a very small Gatling machine gun.

A distinctive feature of such multi-barreled pistols was a rotating block of barrels. PepperBox was charged from the side of the barrel, initially it repeated the process of charging vintage flint pistols, but in the future samples of multi-barrel pistols began to appear more and more resembling revolvers, which also had a folding mechanism in the design, which allowed charging pistols from the breech part. It is believed that the first Pepperboxes were created by designers in the UK and the USA, it happened around the years 1780-1800, after which the pistols quickly spread throughout the world. Their models of PepperBox were created in Russia, but in our country they have never been a priority, and rarely created samples were almost the exact embodiment of foreign analogues.


Six Bar Pepperbox


If we consider the traditional scheme, the Pepperboxes were distinguished by the presence of six trunks of a small length, models with four trunks were also widely distributed, the trunks were screwed into a rotating block. Common in the design were flintlock and the seed shelf. In all the first models of unusual weapons, the barrel block was rotated by the shooter exclusively by hand, it was necessary to do this with gloves, since after the shot the “spent” barrel heated up. Also, the shooter needed to sprinkle a new batch of gunpowder on the shelf each time, which did not increase the efficiency and rate of fire of the Pepperbox, but even in this form the gun found its niche.

At first, the presence of a flintlock significantly reduced the capabilities of multi-barreled pistols. After the appearance of the capsule lock, they found a second life. Proto-revolvers with a new capsule lock (sometimes experts use such a designation for peperboxes) could boast the possibility of continuous shooting. The cross on an unusual family of short-barreled firearms was put by revolvers. Classic revolvers became widespread in the first half of the XIX century, and the invention of Samuel Colt, who improved their design, adding the ability to automatically rotate the drum, finally buried peperboxes.

The idea of ​​multiple weapons in our days


If you think that multi-barrel small arms are a victim of technological progress and are forever lost in the first half of the 19th century, you will be wrong. Samples of multi-barrel weapons were created in the 20th and 21st centuries. In the Soviet Union, on the basis of the TKB-022 PM submachine gun, the designer-gunsmith German Korobov in 1962 created perhaps the most interesting automatic weapon for 7,62-mm caliber cartridges. The designer created a three-barreled automatic machine, which was officially called the 7,62-mm three-barreled device for volley fire, the weapon received the index model 3Б. Three barrels, combined in one machine gun, provided a firing rate crazy for such a weapon - up to 1400-1800 rounds per minute. At the same time, Korobov borrowed some of the structural elements from the legendary Kalashnikov assault rifle, which not only accelerated development, but also significantly simplified the construction of an unusual assault rifle.


Three-barreled machine TKB-059


It is worth noting that German Korobov did not stop at the 3B model, creating an even more advanced triple-barreled machine, which received the TKB-059 index. Its main difference from its predecessor was the smaller mass-dimensional characteristics; this was achieved due to the processing of certain weapon units and the introduction of new production technologies. The model successfully stood the test, and was the most real military weapons. Moreover, TKB-059 showed excellent accuracy of fire, thanks to the almost simultaneous firing of three rounds in one queue. The disadvantages of weapons attributed the complexity of the equipment cartridges, the specificity of the design, all this, along with the lack of an urgent need to replace the AKM and left the unusual machine in the status of experimental development.


Gilboa Snake double-barreled assault rifle


The idea with multi-barreled small arms was not lost in the XXI century. In 2012, at one of the arms exhibitions, Israeli designers of the Silver Shadow company demonstrated to the public their vision of a modern multi-barreled weapon - a double-barreled automatic rifle machine called Gilboa Snake. In fact, this is a modern assault rifle, which can be made in various calibers, the base one - under the NATO cartridge 5,56x45 mm. The Israelis created their model on the basis of a shortened version of the Gilboa Commando assault rifle. The new instance received an extended receiver box, with which the designers combined two barrels parallel to each other at a distance in 30 mm. It is important to understand that this is not a mass sample. The salvo machine was originally developed for the needs of the special forces of the Israel Defense Forces; weapons never claimed the role of a mass armor for conventional infantry units. The presence of such a double-barreled automaton only expands the capabilities of the special forces, allowing it to be used when circumstances and circumstances require it.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    25 May 2019 05: 15
    Thanks to the author for the article ... an interesting overview of this type of weapon. hi
  2. +5
    25 May 2019 07: 24
    The idea with multi-barrel small arms did not disappear in the XNUMXst century.


    MG14Z
  3. +3
    25 May 2019 07: 36
    The idea with multi-barrel small arms did not disappear in the XNUMXst century.

    If the "twin machine gun" thing is quite adequate, then the need for a multiply charged double-barreled shotgun is clearly doubtful

    DP-12
    1. 0
      25 May 2019 11: 45
      Quote: Spade
      If the "twin machine gun" thing is quite adequate, then the need for a multiply charged double-barreled shotgun is clearly doubtful

      No more dubious than a twin machine gun.
      1. +6
        25 May 2019 12: 10
        Quote: Trouble
        No more dubious than a twin machine gun.

        "Twin machine gun" is an excellent solution for turrets on vehicles. Moreover, the solution, which has shown its effectiveness during the Second World War
        1. +3
          25 May 2019 15: 13
          It looks like this is a British patrol in the desert with a pair of aircraft machine guns from the Second World War. An interesting photo, Colleague, but in my opinion a simple "spark" is something other than a "twin machine gun". Although in fact you are absolutely right. hi
          1. +3
            25 May 2019 17: 23
            Quote: Sea Cat
            with spark aviation machine guns

            Despite the enormous problems of such machine guns related to cooling, they still installed. And it was the highest rate of fire. Which made it possible to maintain a sufficient probability of hitting the target during the movement of the machine.

            Here the question is not a technical device, here the question of the principle itself
            You can even remember the American M231 for shooting from the "Bradley" at a rate of 1200 rounds per minute. There is generally one barrel.
            1. +1
              25 May 2019 18: 02
              I read an article by some American about "Bradley", he did not leave "stone unturned" from this BMP. Popularly and step by step he explained what kind of crap it was and why, clearly showing what it means "cutting money in the Pentagon way". I repeat - an article by an American author. good
              1. +2
                25 May 2019 18: 06
                Quote: Sea Cat
                I read an article by some American about "Bradley", he did not leave "stone unturned" from this BMP.

                I'm not talking about "Bradley", I'm talking about a special rifle for shooting from embrasures "Bradley"

        2. 0
          26 May 2019 13: 45
          Quote: Spade
          Great solution for turrets on technology. Not only that, the solution, which proved to be effective even during the Second World War

          And this was safely forgotten for more than half a century. Moreover, this initiative was used only in North Africa by SAS units.
          A double-barreled shotgun is twice as much shot / buckshot, as a "twin machine gun" is twice the rate of fire.
  4. 0
    25 May 2019 08: 13
    Most likely, firing from an unusual shotgun was carried out in one gulp, which made it possible to fire seven bullets at a target in one shot.
    Bursts with a cut-off of up to seven shots.
    The effect for the enemy was monstrous, as was the expected return at the time of the shot.
    The enemy is roe deer and deer, maybe wild boars. The return is acceptable when you consider the mass of 10 kg (I think so).
    The weapon could hardly be called mobile, given the dimensions and mass, which should have been very impressive.
    In the presence of a squire-loader?
    to hunt with him would be sheer madness if we disregard the case when a deer or other forest animals did not run out to the hunter who took up the position themselves.
    During a driven hunt, animals run out to the hunter almost themselves: the point is that the beaters drive the beast at the shooters.
    The original decisions of the gunsmith include the presence of a tactical handle, an advanced solution for its time. Without it, it was simply impossible to hold the gun at the time of the shot.
    It is, rather, an emphasis for a small monopod. To cope with recoil is not so difficult as to take aim with hands with such a mass and balance. Moreover, at that time they had not yet come to modern rifle racks.
    1. +2
      25 May 2019 08: 37
      Somewhat incomprehensible are the possible advantages of a multi-barreled volley over an oversized caliber. all the same, the trunks are not rifled in these multi-barrel boarding monsters. Therefore, the expansion of bullets, although less than one barrel with a buckshot, but this is still to see, plus or minus. But the weight and mobility of the card holder greatly wins.
      1. +1
        25 May 2019 09: 12
        Quote: abrakadabre
        Somewhat incomprehensible are the possible advantages of a multi-barreled volley over an oversized caliber.
        Multi-barreled is not a volley, but a queue. I wrote in the first line.
        Queue is a more comfortable return.
        12,5mm is about the 32nd caliber of the modern.
        The mass of volley of round bullets is 80 + g, and if something is cylinder-conical, then more.
        80g in one shot is a lot.
        The same MP-153 in the 89mm chamber can be 64. This is probably very painful: it’s unpleasant for me to shoot 38 g, although I’m not easy. True, the gun is only 3,2 kg, not 10+
        1. 0
          25 May 2019 16: 32
          Multi-barreled is not a volley, but a queue.
          How is the delay between shots organized there? Especially out of that five-barreled sawn-off shotgun? Different length of the flame tube? So when burning gunpowder, the pause between shots will not even be a millisecond. I did not notice something on all the presented old samples, even a hint of a rotary mechanism or multi-course, in order to bring a new barrel after the shot of the previous one. Well, the return is highly dependent on the weight of gunpowder.
          1. +2
            25 May 2019 17: 58
            Quote: abrakadabre
            Multi-barreled is not a volley, but a queue.
            How is the delay between shots organized there? Especially out of that five-barreled sawn-off shotgun? Different length of the flame tube? So when burning gunpowder, the pause between shots will not even be a millisecond. I did not notice something on all the presented old samples, even a hint of a rotary mechanism or multi-course, in order to bring a new barrel after the shot of the previous one. Well, the return is highly dependent on the weight of gunpowder.


            Apparently the comrade thinks that possible small delays, when firing in a salvo, some barrels from the block, can be considered "burst firing".
            The delays are caused by the quality of the gunpowder and the contamination of the fire tubes. But the delay is really miserable.

            Here's a video of a Nock shotgun


            And this is shooting from a five-barrel gun with bronze trunks, presented in the article.


            Since the gun is Dupes ( or dapre ??? ) structurally does not differ from the presented samples, it also shot in one gulp. The only difference is that the shooter was able to make two volleys, not one. Since the gun has two blocks of trunks with its own lock on the block. And it was rifled.
            “Well, or he could have made a volley with a doublet from two blocks, although it is still unknown who will take the most damage in this case - the shooter or the enemy.”

            How is the delay between shots organized there?


            Flintlock shotguns did exist.
            Here is a description of one design (see link).
            It is shown how the delay between shots was carried out.



            https://zen.yandex.ru/media/hazardtv/4h-stvolnyi-23h-zariadnyi-karabin-xvii-veka--5af48b737425f5fcbcde6854
            1. 0
              25 May 2019 21: 01
              Quote: Freeman
              Apparently the comrade thinks that possible small delays, when firing in a salvo, some barrels from the block, can be considered "burst shooting"

              You have very slurredly stated your position. You can even understand that these guns really shot in bursts :) But if you read it, then you refute it. This is true?
              1. 0
                26 May 2019 11: 11
                Quote: Saxahorse
                Quote: Freeman
                Apparently the comrade thinks that possible small delays, when firing in a salvo, some barrels from the block, can be considered "burst shooting"

                You have very slurredly stated your position. You can even understand that these guns really shot in bursts :) But if you read it, then you refute it. This is true?


                All the confusion due to the fact that we project our modern concepts of automatic weapons on the technical capabilities of the past.

                So we must proceed from the task that the gunsmith set for himself - firing in one gulp, as in the case of the Nock gun.

                Or a sequence of shots, as in this design.
                (video from the link to my post, for those who "niasilil many letters")
                1. 0
                  27 May 2019 01: 38
                  Quote: Freeman
                  All the confusion is due to the fact that we project our modern concepts of automatic weapons on the technical capabilities of the past.

                  I don’t understand why so many words are in response to a simple question .. Judging by the video, this ingenious design shot an extended volley. Shooting with bursts is still a controlled process; here, once you pull the trigger, you cannot change anything until all bullets fly out. In general, a dubious idea.
                  1. 0
                    27 May 2019 03: 10
                    Quote: Saxahorse
                    Quote: Freeman
                    All the confusion is due to the fact that we project our modern concepts of automatic weapons on the technical capabilities of the past.

                    Shooting with bursts is still a controlled process, here, once you pull the trigger, you cannot change anything until all bullets fly out. In general, a dubious idea.

                    By no means.
                    Judging by its size, it is a cavalry weapon. Shooting at a dense cavalry (infantry) formation with a "fan burst" gives a chance to hit more opponents than in the case of firing a single bullet from a pistol (carbine), or firing a blunderbuss with buckshot.
                    1. 0
                      27 May 2019 22: 00
                      Quote: Freeman
                      Shooting at a dense cavalry (infantry) formation with a "fan burst" gives a chance to hit more opponents than in the case of firing a single bullet from a pistol (carbine), or firing a blunderbuss with buckshot.

                      The very idea of ​​firing more bullets in one shot is certainly laudable, but frankly speaking, the implementation is very bad.

                      Remember the old meme ?:
                      "in electrical engineering there are only two types of faults. lack of contact where it is needed and the presence of contact where it is not needed at all" (c)

                      Exactly so here. With high probability, the force of the flame may be lost and not penetrate one of the many tubules prepared for this. As a result, this muzzle-loading prodigy will have to be discharged for a long time and painfully. And even worse, a force of flame can suddenly find an inappropriate hole and penetrate one of the wad ahead of time. Get a shot with a double-triple-quadruple charge with a high probability of rupture of trunks. I’m already silent about the complicated charging procedure with a high probability of somewhere to make mistakes ..

                      It may be recalled that attempts to create multi-charge in this way, by sequential loading into one barrel, were made not once or twice. It ended equally badly, sooner or later such an enhanced shot happened with the exit of the weapon (and the shooter) out of order.
            2. +1
              25 May 2019 23: 58
              Quote: Freeman
              The delays are caused by the quality of the gunpowder and the contamination of the fire tubes.
              Delays are caused by the quality of the powder, the quality of the backfill, compaction and long fire tube.
              However, the snapshot shows the non-simultaneous release of shells.

              Quote: Freeman
              And it was rifled.
              Those. the bullets are most likely not round and heavier than the balls, which means that the mass of the "salvo" could be more than 100g.
              1. 0
                26 May 2019 13: 05
                Simargl (Andrey) Yesterday, 23: 58
                Those. bullets are probably not round and heavier than balls

                Not necessarily, they could be spherical.
                In the Sharpe Shooter novels mentioned in the article, he loaded his "rifle" (Baker Rifle) with a bullet wrapped in a piece of pigskin.
                Without the use of this obturator, the rifle could shoot cartridges from the regular smooth-bore musket of the English army “Brown Bess”, however, it lost its advantages in range and accuracy of the shot, but won in rate of fire.

                Excerpt from the novel "Sharpe's Chaos"
                ... They brought ten boxes of cartridges - not so good as they do for rifle shooting, but suitable in case of need. Harper filled his shako with ammunition and now laid them out on the parapet, to which the arrows rested their rifles and ramrods, and grumbled:
                “And that, sir, they consider ammo suitable ?!”
                .........................................................
                - In places! He ordered, throwing the gnawed bone into the garden. - When they come closer, try to get into people with stairs.

                Even if his long-range rifles were not taken into account, he doubted that the French would be able to get close enough to put the stairs to the garden wall, but it was better to be safe. Most of his shooters used short minutes of silence to load the newly cleaned rifles wrapped in leather shreds carefully kept for such an occasion in a pencil case with bullets and high-quality gunpowder. This meant that their first shots would be truly deadly accurate. When the French come closer and the battlefield is covered with a dense curtain of powder smoke, they will switch to cartridges, sacrificing accuracy for the sake of rate of fire. Sharpe loaded his rifle the same way.


                Pencil case in the butt of the Baker Rifle rifle
                1. 0
                  26 May 2019 23: 56
                  Baker's rifle most likely fired conical bullets (or Leah-like "cups"). The ball is very imprecise, even when trying to twist it.
                  Heh ... 305 m / at 15,6 mm ... I have a meaner gun: 32g bullet 450 m / s wassat 3200 J ... from 100 m to the thoracic target without any problems.
                  1. 0
                    27 May 2019 03: 00
                    Quote: Simargl
                    Baker's rifle most likely fired conical bullets (or Leah-like "cups"). The ball is very imprecise, even when trying to twist it.
                    Heh ... 305 m / at 15,6 mm ... I have a meaner gun: 32g bullet 450 m / s wassat 3200 J ... from 100 m to the thoracic target without any problems.

                    And yet spherical (round)



                    Video from the rector britishmuzzleloaders in 3 parts.
                    1 part

                    2 part

                    3 part


                    I have a meaner gun: 32g bullet 450 m / s wassat 3200 J ... from 100 m to the thoracic target without any problems.

                    If from “Brown Bess” the shooter hit the target at 70 meters, then from “Baker Rifle” at 250 (300) meters.
                    The accuracy of the Baker system and the strongest blow of a soft lead bullet weighing 31 grams led to terrifying open wounds, which, due to shock or gangrene, almost always ended in death.
          2. +1
            25 May 2019 23: 54
            Quote: abrakadabre
            the pause between shots will not even be a millisecond.
            An-94 has 0,035 s. How many milliseconds is it? PPSh has 0,05 ... how much is it?
            For a simultaneous shot, there should be a common chamber, and they are separate there for each barrel, otherwise there would be no shooting, but nonsense.
  5. 0
    25 May 2019 10: 07
    The rate of fire in modern weapons is a very controversial issue and can be easily solved, accuracy is a priority. For example, on the first samples of assault rifles there were gas regulators that allowed you to choose the rate of fire. For submachine guns, this is generally a common problem, they constantly use retarders. art "than a necessity.
    1. +2
      25 May 2019 10: 15
      Quote: shinobi
      controversial issue and easily solved, accuracy is a priority.

      And if this, for example, shooting from a moving armored object?
      1. 0
        26 May 2019 01: 36
        Here you have tanking in your childhood. There you can clearly see the Pchem abandoned multi-element systems. What is good for a cruiser, it can be bad for land. Aviation and air defense stand apart.
        1. +2
          26 May 2019 08: 10
          Quote: shinobi
          abandoned as a result of multi-element systems.

          Rapid-fire machine gun is much simpler than other existing systems that provide sufficient accuracy of shooting in motion
  6. 0
    25 May 2019 16: 13
    Damn, really interesting, especially about modern weapons. Many thanks to the author!))
  7. 0
    25 May 2019 18: 05
    In general, multi-barreled guns are a joke, take at least IZH-54, one barrel under 0000 another under buckshot, pigs can go out, and they have fangs of 5 cm, they tear dogs.
  8. 0
    25 May 2019 21: 04
    Today is just a holiday! The second consecutive interesting article :) Special thanks to the author for the original topic!

    At the same time, it is clear where the ancient meme came from - "You can't get into a crowd of hares from a six-barrel gun !?" laughing
  9. 0
    25 May 2019 22: 38
    For new lovers of fittings, get medical tweezers past the barrel, the pheasant twitches with a bang, but the duck is heavy. However, it is possible to pull it out in December, so they gut it and remove the skin with a feather. Quick cooking boil the shulum.
    Pheasant-Utka can be baked in Kazakhstan, saxaul. But in Russia there are problems with birch, and then you have to wait on coal so that the tar burns out. Therefore, the shulum is cooked.
  10. +1
    26 May 2019 16: 09
    fellow
    Found some multi-barrel weapons
  11. +1
    26 May 2019 16: 13

    "Duck paw"
  12. +1
    26 May 2019 16: 18
    A medieval device to demonstrate the disagreement of the executive with the legislative.
  13. +1
    26 May 2019 16: 34
    A few more of my photos of multi-barrel weapons
  14. +1
    26 May 2019 16: 42
    Pepperboxes and a cross between shotguns with a carbine and a revolver.
  15. +1
    26 May 2019 16: 45
    Three-barrel wick gun (glare from the glass could not be edited ... No. )
  16. 0
    26 May 2019 17: 40
    A three-barrel gun hangs in the Abay Museum near Semipalatinsk: two smooth trunks, one rifled.
    1. +1
      27 May 2019 23: 00
      What is higher - a three-barrel wick gun and a multi-barrel wick gun on a stand - this is Venice, Doge's Palace.