Self-propelled aircraft from aircraft manufacturers. Project ACS-57 OKB-115

47
In the second half of the forties, the development of new types of military equipment for airborne troops began. Among other things, the Airborne Forces needed lightweight self-propelled assault guns. In the shortest possible time were proposed several similar machines with different weapons. One of the most interesting examples was the ACS-57 machine, developed in OKB-115.

Glider and self-propelled gun


In the creation of new armored vehicles for the Airborne Forces the leading role was played by enterprises that had the necessary experience in this field. However, in 1948, the SAU decided to try OKB-115, headed by A.S. Yakovlev. At that time, the bureau was engaged in the development of the Yak-14 airborne glider, and at the same time it was planned to create a lightweight ACS that was compatible with it. The new model was named ASU-57 (“Airborne self-propelled unit, 57 mm”), because of which it can be confused with the development of the same name of plant No. XXUMX.




ACS-57 OKB-115 on testing


According to some sources, the self-propelled gun project ASU-57 was not created by OKB-115, but by the Kharkov Tank Repair Plant No. 115. However, data discovered and published in recent years refute this version. A new model of land equipment did exactly aviation OKB.

Despite the lack of experience, OKB-115 quickly coped with the new task. The design assignment for the ACS appeared at the beginning of February 1948, and by the end of February a set of drawings had to go to production. Start of production tests scheduled for the end of March. During the development, it was necessary to adjust the approved appearance of the car, but no radical changes were foreseen.

Design features


The project ACS-57 envisaged the construction of a tracked self-propelled artillery system for a log cabin layout with a partially open fighting compartment. The front of the hull was given under the arms and crew seats, and behind them was the engine compartment. Measures were taken to simplify operation in the Airborne Forces, in particular, landing.

The ACS received a welded body with differentiated armor thickness from 4 to 12 mm. The frontal projection was covered by a large inclined sheet, above which was placed the so-called. lamp - curved shield with viewing devices. For suspension under the cargo glider, the lantern was folded backwards and downwards. The front sheet had a niche for a gun mount.


Side view. Noticeable characteristic low silhouette


In the rear of the hull, the GAZ-M-20 gasoline engine with an 50 horsepower capacity was mounted on the right along the side. The transmission included a bevel main gear, a four-speed GAZ-AA gearbox, two side clutches and two single-row side gearboxes. The engine and transmission were controlled by a traditional set of levers and pedals. The electrical system of the machine was based on the generator GBF-4105.

The chassis had four rubber-supported road wheels with a torsion bar on each side. The same skating rink without a bandage was used as a steering wheel. Driving wheels were placed at the back. Caterpillar collected from tracks, borrowed from the tractor T-20 "Komsomolets".

In the forward part of the body placed the machine for mounting the main armament. ASU-57 received an automatic gun 113P caliber 57 mm, originally created for promising fighter aircraft. The gun was mounted with a shift back, because of which only a limited part of the barrel with a muzzle brake protruded through the embrasure. The barrel passed through the habitable compartment, and the breech was located next to the engine compartment.

The gun 113P used automation based on a short recoil of the barrel. Technical rate of fire - 133 shot per minute. Next to her breech on the left was a feeding mechanism with a box for loose tape on 15 unitary shots 57х350 mm. Nearby were two boxes of 16 and 20 shells. Normal ammunition was determined in 31 shot, when overloaded - 51 with the placement of additional tape in a separate box. Recharging after spending the first tape was carried out hydraulically. The next recharge required the intervention of the crew.


Cannon with gun 113P


The gun mount received hydraulic drives for aiming in two planes, as well as a hydraulic reloading mechanism. Horizontal guidance was carried out in a sector with a width of 16 °, vertical - from -1 ° to + 8 °. Aviation collimator sight PBP-1A was used for guidance. Later it was replaced by the K8-T product borrowed from tank machine gun installations.

The crew consisted of only two people. To the right of the gun in the nose of the case was a driver. Left placed commander-gunner. For observation, they had their own viewing instruments in the lamp. Access to crew seats was through the roof. Normally, the ACS should have had a radio station, but it was not installed on an experienced car.

The length of the ACS-57 from OKB-115, taking into account the gun, slightly exceeded 4,5 m. The width is 3,8 m, the height is only 1,38 m in a combat position or slightly more than 1 m with a folded lantern. Combat weight - 3255 kg. The car had to reach speeds of up to 45 km / h, and the 120-l tank gave 167 km of power reserve. ASU-57 had to overcome various obstacles, incl. fords.

Failed tests


In the early summer of 1948, Plant No. 115 handed over a prototype of the new amphibious assault landing system to the Kubinka training ground for testing by the army. Within a few weeks, the car showed running and fire qualities. The test results were far from desired.


View from the engine compartment to the fighting compartment and crew seats


The power plant SAU was weak. Service was difficult. There was no shielding wiring. After 62 h work the engine had to be changed due to a serious breakdown. The transmission, however, worked out properly and without significant problems. The chassis was not strong enough, and therefore regularly required to tighten the bolts and nuts. There were no slats above the caterpillar, because of which the self-propelled gun was covered with dust. The lack of a silencer on the exhaust pipe created discomfort and led to the risk of fire.

Fire tests were limited to 21 shot, after which all the flaws became clear. The muzzle brake of the 113P gun raised dust, interfering with observation, and also had a negative effect on the crew. In addition, at the first shot, he broke a single headlamp. Hydraulic guidance system provided insufficient angles of movement of the gun. At the same time there was no synchronous movement of the gun and sight. During operation, the pressure in the hydraulic system quickly fell, interfering with the guidance. The design of the guidance systems eliminated the use of a traveling stopper gun.

The collimator aircraft sight made it difficult to guide at long distances. The ammunition system was unsuccessful. The project provided for a quick replacement of the tape by the gunner, but in practice, reloading required the work of two gunners and took about 10-15 minutes. At the same time, people had to leave the protected compartment.

There were also many other flaws. Poor protection of the crew against shelling from the side and from the stern, lack of entrenching tools, insufficient set of spare parts, etc. were noted.


Modified version of ACS-57


According to the test results, the ACS-57 was recognized as unsuccessful and not meeting the requirements of the army. Experienced car returned to the factory. Soon, the comparative tests of several new models were completed, and the machine of the same name from plant No. XXUMX was put into service.

Attempt to upgrade


In the same year, 1948, OKB-115 attempted to correct the deficiencies and improve the existing ACS. New proposals implemented on the layout, and then in the form of a full-fledged prototype.

The modernization project included the abandonment of a half-open habitable compartment. Behind the lantern appeared additional armor, forming the roof of the wheelhouse. Redesigned viewing devices in the lamp. Boxes for spare parts and other property, as well as external fixings, have been seriously upgraded. The composition of the power plant remained, but all auxiliary units were altered, which caused criticism during testing.

The gun mount lost its hydraulics and was driven by hand mechanisms. The angle of inclination was brought to -2 ° with the possibility of increasing to -5 ° by opening the hatches above the breech. The hydraulics in the reloading mechanism of the gun were replaced by pneumatics. The sight PBP-1А was replaced with an OP-1 with magnification. Introduced other minor improvements.


Self-propelled gun with missile launcher


ASU-57 still did not have machine-gun armament, but now it was proposed to supplement the gun with rockets. At the stern, it was planned to mount a lightweight, removable launcher on 30 rockets PC-82. The launch control was carried out from under the armor or from the remote control.

The updated ASU-57 retained its previous dimensions, but it became heavier to 3,33 tons. The launcher for the PC-82 added 320 kg of mass. Mobility remained at the same level.

At the end of October, the second version of 1948 ACS-57 was sent to Kubinka for new tests. After the checks, in early February 1949 was returned to plant number XXUMX without any complaints about the operation and reliability of the units. However, the military did not consider the OKB-115 project in the context of future rearmament.

The further fate of the experienced ACS-57 is not known for certain. Apparently, it did not save and disassembled for parts. The first and last project of an aviation OKB-115 in the field of land armored vehicles did not give the desired results. It should be noted that the bureau did make a significant contribution to the development of the airborne troops. His glider Yak-14 entered service and has been actively used for many years. However, he had to carry self-propelled automatic control systems of the bureau.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    2 June 2019 18: 08
    Poor crew protection from side and aft shelling was noted, lack of a trench tool, insufficient set of spare parts, etc.


    Especially the last two - well, absolutely insurmountable obstacles

    I wonder what is behind the "etc." - the absence of camouflage on the armor, which makes it noticeable and the self-propelled gun ran out of fuel?
  2. +2
    2 June 2019 18: 17
    This is our story, and not only in the creation of armored forces, but also in new technologies
  3. +4
    2 June 2019 18: 46

    Landing Glider Yak-14.
    1. +5
      2 June 2019 19: 39
      In the post-war period, several ACS models were developed for the Airborne Forces, but there was no transport aircraft capable of transporting such equipment. Therefore, at the same time, self-propelled guns were developed for their transport.

      In October 1946 in Gorky at the plant number 92 named after I.V. Stalin began to create a 76-millimeter gun, and at the factory number 40 (Mytishchi) - the chassis for a light airborne self-propelled artillery installation (ACS). The development of the chassis was led by one of the best designers of the USSR N.A. Astrov.
      In March 1947, a preliminary design of the “object 570” was completed, and already in June of that year, a technical project. Plant No. 92 in November 1947 produced two prototypes of the LB-76S gun, transferred to plant No. 40. The first experimental self-propelled gun was assembled at the plant in December. In 1948, factory tests began.
      From July to September 1949, in the 38 airborne corps (Tula region), military tests passed four prototypes of the ACS. 17 December 1949, the Council of Ministers signed a decree according to which the unit was adopted under the designation ASU-76 (“airborne self-propelled unit, 76-mm”). ASU-76 was the first to enter service with the domestic armored vehicle designed specifically for the Airborne Forces.
      However, the car was never produced - the Il-32 glider, which was supposed to carry it, "did not fly."
      1. +2
        2 June 2019 19: 40

        Landing glider IL-32. Built in a single copy.
  4. -1
    2 June 2019 19: 10
    Looks like a Chinese toy. Some kind of awkward
  5. +8
    2 June 2019 20: 45
    hi Thank you.
    ... Project ACS-57 provided for the construction of a tracked self-propelled artillery cabin assembly with a partially open fighting compartment.
    1. +4
      2 June 2019 23: 28
      Sanchez! hi Do you even have this in the bins !?
      ASU-57, the one that was adopted, I saw at the test site, next to my "half-four", it looked like a "Zaporozhets" with a KAMAZ.
      1. +5
        3 June 2019 09: 28
        hi ... This is not mine, ... in Tube in the warehouse it was "lying around" smile
        ... next to "child":
        1. +3
          3 June 2019 20: 42
          Well, for the ability to find in the warehouse everything you need! drinks
          1. +2
            3 June 2019 20: 45
            drinks ... you will not drink experience smile hi
            1. +2
              3 June 2019 20: 48
              That's right, Comrade Field Marshal !!! hi good
  6. +1
    2 June 2019 20: 52
    Something reminds

    https://topwar.ru/109180-samohodnaya-artilleriyskaya-ustanovka-a25-e2-alecto-velikobritaniya.html
  7. 0
    2 June 2019 21: 39
    .... for what it seems that the product was promising .... very impressive! .... but we are not in the headquarters .... it is not for us to decide .... article +! .......
    1. 0
      3 June 2019 04: 05
      ASU-57 was in service with the Airborne Forces. They began to take off arms after the appearance of the BMD-1.
      https://topwar.ru/10822-asu-57-protivotankovoe-samohodnoe-orudie-vozdushno-desantnyh-podrazdeleniy.html
      In this article, a story about an experimental model that has not been adopted. ACS-76, although it was put into service, but was not mass-produced and was not in service with the Airborne Forces. A total of 7 pieces of this self-propelled gun were produced.
      https://topwar.ru/3361-samoxodnaya-artilleriya-desanta-asu-76-asu-57-asu-85.html
  8. +2
    2 June 2019 22: 14
    What ?? Normal)) for aircraft manufacturers. You didn’t see the yacht that the aircraft builders concocted. In 91 or 92, they allocated good money to create a family sailing yacht and distributed this money to TADAMMMM, AIRCRAFT PLANTS, and even the shoals of a Japanese yacht were given, such as a peep. So this self-propelled gun is generally a miracle of technology)))
  9. Alf
    0
    2 June 2019 22: 46
    Yakovlev did not take up his business. I would build planes, but build. And as an aircraft designer after the war, Yakovlev somehow quickly blown away.
    1. Alf
      0
      3 June 2019 19: 21
      Quote: Alf
      And as an aircraft designer after the war, Yakovlev somehow quickly blown away.

      Is anyone against it? Give the Yakovlev aircraft, adopted after a war in large numbers.
      1. +1
        3 June 2019 21: 17
        yak 15, 17, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 38, 130
        hi
        1. Alf
          +1
          3 June 2019 21: 41
          Quote: Corn
          yak 15, 17, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 38, 130hi

          Yak-15. The only Yakovlev fighter jet that was in the Air Force as a combat vehicle. 280 pieces.
          Yak-17. Airplane for training pilots. 430 pieces.
          Yak-23. He was practically not in the Air Force; everything went to our smaller brothers. 310 pcs.
          Yak-25-series interceptor. 638 pieces
          Yak-27. Interceptor. 180 pieces.
          Yak-28. Front bomber. 638 pcs. It was not officially adopted.
          Yak-30. Training. 4 pieces.
          Yak-38. Don’t understand what, it’s not worth equating with Harrier.
          The only serial Yakovlev fighter in our Air Force-Yak-15. All the rest could not stand the competition with the MiG-15. If by maneuverability they were still more or less with the MiG, then by speed, weapons, survivability, range they were behind. The number of MiG-15s released in 15600 pieces can not even be compared.
          1. +1
            3 June 2019 22: 00
            I will correct a little
            Quote: Alf
            Yak-28. Front bomber. 1 180 pcs.
            Corrected a little
            Yak-30. Training. 4 pieces.
            he really hit the list by accident.
            You yourself asked about the post-war mass aircraft of Yakovlev, what is wrong this time? All planes sold hundreds of pieces, which is pretty good.
            All the rest could not stand the competition with the MiG-15.
            Mig-15 and its modifications, these are highly specialized air combat vehicles, the light has not converged on them, there are still interceptors, attack aircraft, bombers, reconnaissance vehicles, transporters, vertical aircraft in aviation, and the Yakovlev Design Bureau has been very successful in many of these areas.
            1. Alf
              0
              3 June 2019 22: 22
              Quote: Corn
              Corrected a little
              hi

              Quote: Corn
              You yourself asked about the post-war mass aircraft of Yakovlev, what is wrong this time? All planes sold hundreds of pieces, which is pretty good.

              1200 fighters Yakovlev compare with 15 thousand MiGs. Is this not evidence that the Yakovlev fighters lost to Mikoyan? The Yakovlev fighter aircraft were abandoned immediately. Already adopted MiG-15 with an arrow-shaped wing, and Yakovlev sculpted everything with a straight line.
              Quote: Corn
              Mig-15 and its modifications, these are highly specialized air combat vehicles,

              But the Yak-15, 23 is a machine for what? The same planes for a fight.
              Quote: Corn
              attack aircraft

              What kind of attack aircraft did Yakovlev create?
              Quote: Corn
              bombers, scouts,

              The Yak-28 was not officially adopted by the Air Force.
              Quote: Corn
              transporters

              Yak-transporter? What is the model?
              Yakovlev even climbed into helicopter building, blinded the Yak-24. They made 40 copies and after 2 years they wrote off.
              About the Yak-28.
              In operation, the aircraft turned out to be quite complex and largely abandoned, despite the almost complete absence of any automation. Throughout the operation of the machine, there were a lot of restrictions, including complicated aerobatics and a corkscrew. Due to the non-synchronous ignition, as well as periodic self-shutdown of the afterburner, takeoff was allowed only at the maximum engine afterburner operation mode (MBFR) and afterburners were switched on after take-off, since when the afterburner was turned off, a significant difference occurred, which inevitably led to disaster. To prevent this phenomenon, a system was installed on the plane — an AK-2A automatic machine, which, in the event of a different motor rod, automatically deflected the rudder, fending off the plane's turn in the direction of the failed engine. In practice, the course machine was unreliable, and many disasters occurred due to its abnormal operation. For a long time, the flap release system, which developed insufficient effort, was criticized, and sometimes one of the flaps at the landing was not fully released. The problem was subsequently resolved by installing a more powerful hydraulic drive.
              Nevertheless, the aircraft was respected among aviators. The impressive thrust-weight ratio caused special delight - when taking off without armament, after igniting the afterburners, the aircraft could gain altitude almost vertically.
              The fuselage of the aircraft turned out to be quite weak and deformed when fully loaded, while it was impossible to close the lights. Therefore, it was necessary to first land the pilot and navigator, close the cockpit, and only then refuel the aircraft and suspend ammunition (it was necessary to mount large-caliber bombs). In addition, the small clearance between the fuselage and the concrete coating of the airfield did not allow the suspension of large-caliber bombs. I had to build special lockable "pits" in the parking lots, or install the plane on the lifts.

              Is this a plane? With such flaws? By the way, from the pre-war Yak-2 Air Force spat for precisely the same reasons.
              1. 0
                3 June 2019 22: 50
                Is this not evidence that the Yakovlev fighters lost to Mikoyan?
                do you even read or not? Except for Mig-15, there were no other aircraft in the USSR? From the victory in the tender of Mikoyan’s car, you conclude that in general the entire design school of the Union was blown away?
                The Yak-28 was not officially adopted by the Air Force.
                but what the hell difference, the plane was in a large series and was actively used in combat units, the rest is a formality.
                Is this a plane? With such flaws? By the way, from the pre-war Yak-2 Air Force spat for precisely the same reasons.
                it generally does not apply to the topic at all, not even close. I still can’t understand how you got so much negativity towards Yakovlev Design Bureau and the long-dead designer, what did he annoy you with? Have an accident on his yak40 / 42?
                1. Alf
                  0
                  5 June 2019 19: 54
                  Quote: Corn
                  do you even read or not? Except for Mig-15, there were no other aircraft in the USSR? From the victory in the tender of Mikoyan’s car, you conclude that in general the entire design school of the Union was blown away?

                  Union Design School and Yakovlev Design School are two completely different things.
                  You are not reading this or trying to understand. Issue 310 Yak-23 vs. 15600 MiGs is Yakovlev’s loss as a designer. Two engines were offered at the competition - RD-45 and RD-500. What prevented Yakovlev from taking an RD-45 for his car? Nothing. While Mikoyan put an arrow-shaped wing on his RD-45 aircraft, Yakovlev remained in his reality straight wings and a revised scheme. Yakovlev’s company still exists. Where is at least one Yakovlev fighter built and put into series after the war?
                  Yakovlev is especially ugly in the story of Semyon Lavochkin. And Yakovlev didn’t react to Pokryshkin’s unflattering statement about his planes.
  10. +1
    2 June 2019 23: 03
    With a gun, they got excited. A tank, even a small one, not a fighter, it’s difficult to direct and accompany the entire body with a hull.
    1. +4
      2 June 2019 23: 33
      So this is not a tank, but a self-propelled gun, and even an air transportable one. How can you combine "a horse and a quivering doe"?
      1. +1
        3 June 2019 22: 11
        Quote: Sea Cat
        How can you combine "a horse and a quivering doe"?

        Well, after all, the adopted ASU-57 of the classical scheme turned out quite well. The one that Sanchez found in warehouses :) A nimble, light machine, in theory, even fit in the Mi-8. And with guidance there are no problems.
      2. +1
        3 June 2019 22: 58
        How can you combine "a horse and a quivering doe"?


        I personally am against such an exotic bestial incest.

        laughing
    2. +2
      3 June 2019 00: 37
      The Swedes had a tank, which aimed the gun squat.
      1. +1
        3 June 2019 22: 13
        Quote: Horse, lyudovѣd and soulѣlyub
        The Swedes had a tank, which aimed the gun squat.

        Then they changed it to Leopard in the end :) And it is expensive and time-consuming to maintain and not convenient to manage.
      2. +3
        3 June 2019 22: 40
        In general, it is not clear why they called it a tank, self-propelled gun - it is self-propelled gun.
        1. +1
          3 June 2019 22: 43
          But, an infection, he was squat. And our "Nona" also, it seems, knows how to squat but not for aiming.
          1. +2
            3 June 2019 22: 48
            There is a tower on the "Nona", but the Swedes do not understand who is aiming the gun, either the gunner, or the mechanic, or both at once. laughing
            1. +2
              3 June 2019 22: 52
              And who should they be pointed at? On the moose, perhaps?

              laughing

              Here, the cat is pointing.

              Swedish crouching tank
              1. +3
                3 June 2019 22: 53
                No, well, for fuck they built it, so not all the moose were knocked out. wink
                1. +1
                  3 June 2019 23: 11
                  And why did Constipation be built? For four elephants?

                  laughing
                  1. +3
                    3 June 2019 23: 17
                    Constipation is treated with an enema, and elephants ... Oh, my dear mother, I just saw: he doesn’t have a canister along the side? The Swede has a diesel engine, or a carburetor, huh?
                    1. +1
                      3 June 2019 23: 22
                      I suppose that they carry Aquavit in cans. If they catch a runny nose and, in general, for health.

                      In the 60s in Denmark, the state gave out old retirees a week, sort of like 400 grams of Aquavit. For health. But the old people did not need so much and they sold young people cheaply, for whom this was still not enough.

                      drinks
                      1. +3
                        3 June 2019 23: 26
                        What is Aquavit? Water diluted with alcohol? I sat at a table with the Swedes, they can eat no worse than ours. drinks
                      2. +1
                        3 June 2019 23: 30
                        Water is not the main thing there. The main thing is various useful and healing herbs, infused with alcohol and diluted with water up to 40 degrees.

                        Threat ... he was invented as a cure for ... alcoholism.

                        The clearest Aquavit is called Linya. In barrels it is carried twice through the equator. During this time, he flounders in barrels in the right way there, insists and acquires tasteful properties.

                        And for me it's just aniseed vodka. Ivan Vasilyevich respected her very much.
                    2. +2
                      3 June 2019 23: 23
                      - How many elephants fit in Zaporozhets?
                      - Not at all ...
                      - The answer is not correct. The correct answer is four!
                      - ?????
                      - Constipation - a four-seater.
                      1. +3
                        3 June 2019 23: 28
                        Is this not a "Georgian" joke, like about tomatoes and Gogh?
                      2. +1
                        3 June 2019 23: 34
                        Let's finish, otherwise we will be banned for flood now.

                        feel
                      3. +3
                        3 June 2019 23: 46
                        I agree, good night.
  11. +1
    3 June 2019 01: 06
    After 62 hours of operation, the engine had to be changed due to a serious breakdown. The transmission, however, worked properly and without significant problems. The chassis was not strong enough, and therefore regularly required to tighten the bolts and nuts. There were no slats above the caterpillar, due to which the self-propelled gun was covered with dust. The absence of a silencer on the exhaust pipe created discomfort and a risk of fire.
    Engine failure, and where are the designers? The M-20 engine and its GAZ-69 variant were reliable units. By the way, the GAZ-69 engine had shielded electrical equipment. I was simply struck by the fact that Yakovlev Design Bureau took up this work.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +1
    3 June 2019 15: 30
    The 113P muzzle brake raised dust, interfering with observation, and also negatively impacted the crew. In addition, at the first shot he broke a single headlamp.

    No wonder GAU and GABTU so did not like the muzzle brake.
    1. Alf
      +1
      3 June 2019 19: 19
      Quote: Alexey RA
      No wonder GAU and GABTU so did not like the muzzle brake.

      Love, not love, and you can’t argue against the laws of physics. How else to reduce rollback?