"Forty-kapyatka" 45-mm anti-tank gun model 1937 of the year (53-K)

57
45-mm PTP arr. 1937 was the main weapon of the Soviet army during the initial phase of the Second World War. In the design of the cannon, the line of development continues, which begins with the 31 of the 37-millimeter anti-tank gun, adopted by the Red Army in February, acquired from the German company Rheinmetall along with the documentation.

"Forty-kapyatka" 45-mm anti-tank gun model 1937 of the year (53-K)
Soviet soldiers and 45-mm anti-tank gun model 1937 of the year (53-K) ("sorokapyatka")


In the year 1932 on the gun carriage of this gun imposed barrel caliber 45 millimeters. The gun thus obtained became the basis for creating an anti-tank gun of the 1937 model of the year. The wedge gate of this gun, unlike all previous samples, was equipped with a semiautomatic mechanism. In addition, the ballistic characteristics were improved, and the suspension of the wheel travel was also introduced.

A prototype 45-millimeter PTP produced at the factory number 8, where she was assigned a factory index 53-K. After conducting factory tests, he was sent to the Scientific Artillery Test Site. During the tests, which took place from August to September 1937, 897 shots were carried out, of which 184 was from concrete. The system was also tested on a haul for 684 kilometers. The 45-mm gun test passed. The suspension spring crashed during the ride.

Soviet soldiers firing 45-mm anti-tank gun model 1937, 53-K on German positions on the banks of the Volga in Stalingrad


In November 1937, the plant No. 8 produced an experimental series (6 units) 45-mm guns, which differed from the standard guns of the 1932 model of the year:
1. Semiautomatic shutter, which worked when using armor-piercing and fragmentation shells, while the gun model 1932, the year only when using armor-piercing. This was achieved through the forced charging of semi-automatic springs during the shot;
2. Special push-button descent. The button was located in the center of the handwheel;
3. Suspension of a crank-spring type, which was first implemented in the USSR in this system;
4. The PTP wooden wheels of the 1932 model of the year were replaced with GAZ automobile wheels from the State Customs Committee. ZIK-1 wheels were converted from the wheels of the GAZ car with slight changes in the spokes;
5. The upper machine was a riveted-welded structure made of sheet steel, while in the PTS of model 1932, the upper machine was made by casting;
6) The turning mechanism has been changed;
7) Lower machine - welded.

Of the six experimental guns, all but No. 5 were intended for military tests, and sample No. 5 was intended for the needs of the plant. In the period from December 1937 - to January 1938, these guns at the landfill of plant number 8 passed factory tests.

In the ambush "sorokapyatka", 45-mm anti-tank gun model 1937 of the year (53-K)


22 in January, the cannon No. 3 (barrel No. 0734), equipped with the I-3 chuck, was sent to the Scientific Test Artillery Ground, where it arrived on January 28. During factory tests, 605 shots were fired from it. The staff of the NIAP after the delivery of the gun dismantled it, and then collected with errors, resulting in some parts were rendered unusable.

During the ground tests at the Scientific Artillery Test Site, 1208 shots were fired, of which 419 fragmentation and 798 armor-piercing shells. The rate of fire when using the manual descent for both guns (sample 1932 of the year and sample 1937 of the year) is the same with fire without correcting crosstalk. When using a button release, the rate of fire of the 1937 sample gun of the year was 13% higher when firing an armor-piercing projectile and 6% when firing fragmentation. During the shooting, there were 16 semiautomatic failures, of which 13 for armor-piercing projectiles and 3 for fragmentation ones. Some failures occurred due to poor-quality liners. After the 281 th shot, the screw of the inertia body of the semiautomatic device failed. The work of semi-automatics was generally recognized as satisfactory.

Soviet gunners are preparing to open fire from the 45-mm anti-tank gun. Karelian Front


During the ground tests, the gun passed 2074 km, while the speed of wrecking over rough terrain (without a front end) ranged from 15 to 30 km / h, on cobblestone - from 30 to 35 km / h, and along the highway about 60 km / h. The haulage system was stable.

At the beginning of the 38 year, troop tests of three 45-mm 53-K guns (No. 1, 2 and 4) with front I-3 were conducted. In the tests participated 6 tractor "Komsomolets". During military tests, on average, 450 shots were fired at each barrel, while semi-automatics showed trouble-free performance. In these tests produced mileage Moscow - Kharkov - Krasnodar. Once fixed minor flaws, you could start gross production. 24.04.1938, the 53-K gun was adopted under the name 45-millimeter anti-tank gun model 1937 of the year. 06.06.1938 was launched mass production.

The design of the gun consisted of two main parts: the gun carriage and the barrel with a bolt. The bound trunk consisted of a monoblock pipe and a screwed breech. The vertical wedge bolt ensures reliable locking of the bore during firing and provides extraction (ejection) of the spent cartridge after opening. The mechanism of semiautomatic provides a high rate of fire guns - 15-20 shots. Gun carriage is optimal for its purpose - anti-tank gun. The mast includes: a cradle with wheel chocks, an upper movable machine with guidance mechanisms, a lower stationary machine with sliding beds, a sprung motion, a shield cover and aiming devices. Sliding bed provides a horizontal angle of fire to 60 °. A sprung motion using automobile-type wheels makes it possible to transport an instrument using mechanical traction at speeds up to 50 kilometers per hour. When translating the weapon into a firing position, in which the beds are moved all the way to the side, the cushioning mechanism is turned off, and the wheels and the lower machine are rigidly connected through the combat axis, thereby ensuring the stability of the cannon during the shot, as well as the cushioning safety. After transferring the gun to the stowed position (the beds are reduced), the cushioning turns on automatically.

Soviet soldiers in Vyborg against the background of the Vyborg castle with a masked 45-mm anti-tank gun


The compact design of the weapon (length 402 cm) and low shield cover (height 120 cm) ensure its inconspicuousness on the battlefield. To facilitate masking shield shield gun made folding. The gun was mainly used to destroy armored targets and enemy firing points with direct fire at 1000-1500 m. When firing at long distances, the observation of firing results was hampered by a projectile rupture cloud (small in size).

A set of ammunition consisted of unitary cartridges with armor-piercing, sub-caliber and armor-piercing-tracer shells, fragmentation grenades, as well as unitary cartridges with buckshot. Armor-piercing tracer and armor-piercing shells were used to destroy tanks, armored vehicles, as well as for firing at the embrasures of firing structures. When meeting at right angles at a range of 500 meters, they pierced 43 mm armor, and at a distance of 1 km - 32 mm. With a caliber projectile at a range of 500 meters, when meeting at a right angle, armor 66 mm thick was pierced, and at 100 meters - a distance of dagger fire - 88 mm. In the first year of the war, these indicators were quite enough to destroy all types of Wehrmacht tanks.

Soviet artillerymen with 45-mm anti-tank gun


Frag grenade used for the destruction of manpower and openly located firing points. A grenade at break on the surface of the ground gives about 100 damaging elements (fragments) that can defeat on the area up to 7 meters deep and up to 15 meters along the front. Cartridges with grapeshot used to repel infantry attacks on the position of the gun. Range of use to 400 meters. The canister consists of bullets that were placed in a sleeve in a special shell. When firing a bullet from the barrel, they fly out at a certain angle, hitting the enemy forces on the front - up to 60 meters, in depth - up to 400 meters.

In the pre-war years, in addition to these projectiles, smoke and armor-piercing chemical projectiles were produced. The latter were intended to poison the garrisons of the pillboxes and tank crews. The mass of the armor-piercing chemical projectile was 1,43 kg, it contained 16 grams of potent toxic substances.

The production of 45-mm PTP, rolled up before the war, was restored in an exceptionally short time at several enterprises at the same time. One of the enterprises, which was merged with the Kiev plant "Arsenal", evacuated to the east, by the end of 41 had already given the 1,3 front thousands of 45-mm guns of the 1937 model of the year. In the 42 year, the production of these guns was replaced by the production of modernized 45-mm guns of the model 1942 of the year. In total, 42 43-mm PTP model 37354 of the year was manufactured during 45-1937.

The calculation of the Soviet 45-mm anti-tank gun changes position


The 45 mm guns of the 1937 model of the year were armed with anti-tank divisions of rifle divisions (12 guns) and anti-tank platoons of rifle battalions (2 guns). The same guns armed individual anti-tank regiments, which consisted of 4-5 batteries (for 16-20 guns). In the development of anti-tank artillery a landmark was the order of the People's Commissar of Defense against 01.07.1942 of the year. In accordance with this order, anti-tank artillery was renamed fighter-anti-tank. The officer corps, which was part of the PTA, was taken on a special account and appointed only in them. After being treated in hospitals, wounded sergeants and soldiers were to return to PTA units. For the personnel, the following were introduced: increased monetary support, payment of a bonus to the calculation of a weapon for each enemy tank wrecked, a distinctive sleeve insignia. Of course, all this contributed to increasing the effectiveness of anti-tank artillery.

Calculation of the Soviet anti-tank 45-mm guns. Kursk arc. It was removed, most likely, in the rear - it does not look like the conditions of a real battle (the position is not equipped, the hats in the distance are peacefully clean, untouched by the war)


Here is an excerpt from the document of the “Main Artillery Directorate of the Red Army”, which describes the purpose of the 45-K 53-mm PTP: “The 45-mm 1937 anti-tank anti-tank gun of the year is a powerful anti-tank weapon of cavalry and rifle units of the Red Army, which is able to successfully fight off the Red Army, which is able to successfully fight off the Red Army’s cavalry and rifle units of the Red Army, which can successfully fight off the Red Army. tanks of any type.

In addition to the main purpose (destruction of tanks), the gun, which is armed with a canister and fragmentation projectile, can successfully destroy enemy firing points located behind light shelters, infantry and cavalry operating in open areas.

The gun, being in the arsenal of rifle units, must accompany the infantry during all periods of the battle, relentlessly follow it, shooting the enemy firing points with direct fire.

The main fighting qualities of 45-mm PTP are:
a) Maneuverability and mobility;
b) rate of fire;
c) armor penetration;
d) Flatness of the trajectory.

The gun can be transported by mechanical pitch (car or tractor “Komsomolets”), as well as horse pitch. The front and carriage moves of the gun are reliably sprung, which makes it possible to allow speed when moving by mechanical pitch: on tarmac road - 50 — 60 km / h, on dirt roads of good quality - 40-45 km / h, on cobbled bridge - 30-35 km / h…

... To make full use of the fighting qualities of the 45-millimeter anti-tank gun, you need the correct formulation of the fire mission, careful use of the gun to the terrain, and flexible maneuvering during combat.

Fast execution of the assigned fire tasks is ensured thanks to the reliable operation of the gun. To ensure trouble-free operation, excellent training is required for calculating an instrument, strictly coordinated work, the interchangeability of its numbers during loss, and excellent knowledge of the mat. parts of the gun, as well as timely replenishment of ammunition.

For firing from an 45 millimeter PTP model 1937 of the year, unitary cartridges are used as for the 45 millimeter PTP model 1932 of the year. "

Performance characteristics of the 45 millimeter cannon model 1937 of the year:
Caliber - 45 mm;
Weight in the fighting position - 560 kg;
Weight in the stowed position: 1200 kg;
The initial velocity of the projectile - 760 m / s;
The angle of vertical alignment is from -8 ° to 25 °;
The angle of horizontal guidance - 60 °;
Rate of Fire - 15-20 shots per minute;
Maximum firing range - 4400 m;
The maximum direct shot range - 850 m;
Penetration of the norms - 28-40 mm (at distances 500 and 1000 m);
Weight of armor-piercing projectile - 1430
57 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 June 2012 08: 25
    Good article. The gun is wonderful. People who served in units with 45 heroes. Grandfather said that the calculations of 45-k and 76-k plugged the most vulnerable places in the event of a breakthrough or were sent to strengthen the defense of the threatened area. Not many gunners survived until VICTORY DAY! Eternal memory to them.
  2. +2
    27 June 2012 09: 40
    Thanks to the author for the article. What's interesting: many pseudo-historians tell us about the complete uselessness and ineffectiveness of this weapon (supposedly, these calculations were called "goodbye Motherland")
    1. +11
      27 June 2012 09: 58
      My grandfather, a mortarman, told my father that they were called "Death to the enemy, n .... c calculation"
      1. +2
        27 June 2012 15: 31
        they were called "double salary - triple death" of the OPTAB gunners
    2. +3
      27 June 2012 10: 29
      This, as always, 45mm bikes was relevant for German medium tanks until the end of the war.
      For Pz.Kpfw.IV took on board steadily even with screens. And given the fact that as a rule she worked from an ambush, she was quite effective in skilled hands
      1. borisst64
        +4
        27 June 2012 12: 38
        The same gun was used on Soviet light tanks. There is a fact of the destruction of two Pz.Kpfw.V "Panther" by a light tank from an ambush.
        "Sorokapyatka" became a symbol of 41 bloody battles, although it was in the ranks until the end of the war. Lightweight, rapid-fire, reliable. Undoubtedly, it should also be classified as a "weapon of victory".
        1. +4
          27 June 2012 14: 32
          Quote: borisst64
          "Sorokapyatka" became a symbol of 41 bloody battles, although it was in the ranks until the end of the war.

          One veteran told me such a thing. In Berlin, magpies were dragged to the 2-3 floor, since the Germans had wide stairs, they were set up to the balcony door and shot opposite houses.
      2. Kibb
        +4
        27 June 2012 17: 11
        She did not take the three on board, and there is such a photo
    3. mind1954
      +1
      28 June 2012 03: 50
      That's right! This is "goodbye Motherland"!
      Then a veteran who fought on it throughout the war, said
      that she was so well-aimed that they got into the embrasure from two kilometers!
      When I saw her in the hall on the "Poklonnaya Hill" I rushed to hug her with tears!

      I read everywhere that it was taken out of service in the middle of the war,
      and then repeatedly saw in the chronicle during the storming of Berlin!
      Her floors, even dragged ?!

      Let me notice!
      "Goodbye Homeland" is respect!
      But "Death to the enemy, n .... c calculation" and "double salary - triple death" -
      - this, in my opinion, is envy that they themselves have a "gut"! But I am not their judge !!!

      This, it seems to me, is 100% Russian artillerymen, whom
      Leo Tolstoy described in "War and Peace"!
      Himself during the defense of Sevastopol was an artilleryman!
      Thank you for the article !
      1. 0
        29 July 2012 17: 06
        Quote: mind1954
        and then repeatedly seen in the chronicle during the storming of Berlin


        The 45th was in service with the OSHISB (separate assault engineering and combat engineer brigades), was used along with machine guns, the PTR as part of the assault groups during battles in the city (it seems to have begun from Stalingrad) during the storming of fortified buildings, and remained in service until the end of the war thanks to their qualities - mobility, stealth, accuracy!
  3. +3
    27 June 2012 09: 48
    the legendary magpie, something that he didn’t know on the basis of rheinmetal)
    1. 22rus
      +2
      27 June 2012 16: 12
      Quote: Civil
      what on the basis of rheinmetall did not know

      So almost all of our pre-war artillery comes from Germany.
      37-mm and 85-mm anti-aircraft guns, 122-mm howitzer .. 45-ka.
      1. Kibb
        +2
        27 June 2012 16: 26
        Quote: 22rus
        So almost all of our pre-war artillery comes from Germany

        But you are very mistaken in this, although there is a portion of your rightness in this
        Quote: 22rus
        37 mm and 85 mm anti-aircraft guns

        The 85 mm anti-aircraft guns have their own story (and it is indeed German), and the 37 mm anti-aircraft guns - why should Bofors, even if processed, be German?
        Quote: 22rus
        122-mm howitzer

        Which one? There were two of them? And if the M30 then it is Soviet
        1. 22rus
          0
          27 June 2012 17: 23
          Quote: Kibb
          7mm anti-aircraft gun - why should Bofors be reworked German?

          Well, at first they tried to establish the production of the German 3,7cm Flak18.

          Quote: Kibb
          And if the M30 then it is Soviet

          122 mm howitzer
          Originally developed by Krupp, the Germans did not like it for some reason, converted to 122mm and sold to us. After "optimization" for our production went into series under the index M-30
          1. Kibb
            +1
            27 June 2012 17: 57
            Quote: 22rus
            Well, at first they tried to establish the production of the German 3,7cm Flak18.

            Well, after all, they did not fix it, but before that they still tried to set up the production of 37 mm arr 28 - basically overtaken by Vickers - "WE WILL SAY FRIENDLY TO TUKHACHEVSKY"
            Quote: 22rus
            Originally developed by Krupp

            And yet there were TWO of them - one German, another French, and the M30 has no special relationship to them at all
            1. 0
              27 June 2012 18: 11
              Quote: Kibb
              "WE WILL SAY FRIENDLY TO TUKHACHEVSKY"

              My words
              1. Kibb
                +1
                27 June 2012 19: 26
                yes, I quoted
            2. 22rus
              0
              27 June 2012 18: 37
              Quote: Kibb
              M30 has nothing to do with them at all.

              Everybody knows:
              ZIS-3 - designer Grabin;
              D-1 - designer Petrov;
              240 mm mortar - constructor Shavyrin;
              PTR - designer Simonov or Degtyarev.
              PPSh - Shpagin,
              Yak-1,3, .. Yakovlev and so on.
              As soon as we are talking about truly domestic weapons, as a rule, next to the name or even in it is the name of the designer. Those. saying T-34, we immediately remember the name of Koshkin
              And what are the names of which designers come to mind with the name of the 45-mm anti-tank gun? Or an 85mm anti-aircraft gun?
              1. Kibb
                +1
                27 June 2012 19: 47
                Quote: 22rus
                And what are the names of which designers come to mind with the name of the 45-mm anti-tank gun? Or an 85mm anti-aircraft gun?
                е
                I personally -Usenko, Sidorenko, Lipgart, Durlyacher ,, Mohanavov, Ivanov and those same Grabin and Petrov still have about a dozen people to name?
                Quote: 22rus
                Everybody knows:

                here everyone knows and you don’t have that M30 Petrov?
                1. 22rus
                  0
                  27 June 2012 20: 09
                  Quote: Kibb
                  I personally -Usenko, Sidorenko, Lipgart, Durlyacher ,, Mohanavov, Ivanov and those same Grabin and Petrov still have about a dozen people to name?

                  And what do these designers have to do with 53-K?
                  Quote: Kibb
                  here everyone knows and you don’t have that M30 Petrov?

                  It looks like you are surnames Loginov M.N. and Dorokhin G.D. also unfamiliar.
                  1. Kibb
                    +1
                    27 June 2012 21: 00
                    If they would have said that 53K, 19K, 20K, 21K is a bore UNDER THE CARTRIDGE 47 MM GOCHKKIS, the GERMAN gun I didn’t get into a dispute at all, but they said that
                    Quote: 22rus
                    So almost all of our pre-war artillery comes from Germany

                    This is not so !!!
                    1. 22rus
                      0
                      27 June 2012 21: 08
                      Name the 100% Soviet pre-war artillery system.
                      1. Kibb
                        0
                        27 June 2012 22: 19
                        Well, I’ll try, hoya is almost a spree
                        mortar mortar -50 mm
                        bn mortar 82 mm + two 45 mm guns
                        regiment 76 mm +120 mm mortar
                        Division - 76 mm guns (they could have used both model 1902/30 and F22 m USV, where they were model 33 it’s not very clear where
                        Further along the division - howitzers -122 mm there were TWO, old systems plus M30, 152 mm - they all came together in the state, but would they?
                        Case - A19 122mm, gun-howitzer ML152mm, they tried to introduce another 203mm into the cabinet but it didn’t work out
                        By RGK continue?
                      2. 22rus
                        0
                        27 June 2012 22: 48
                        At the heart of all these systems are irrelevant roots. Something is borrowed, something is deeply reworked ... Not a single original scheme, let’s say, like a German gun with a conical barrel. Well, there wasn’t such a design level in Russia that they could create their own absolutely own system.
                      3. Kibb
                        0
                        27 June 2012 23: 03
                        At the heart of any barrel artillery lies one principle - the pressure in the bore, barrel, projectile, while all is just a sleep
                      4. 22rus
                        0
                        28 June 2012 05: 36
                        Especially. The artillery gun was not born in the vastness of Russia.
                      5. Kibb
                        0
                        28 June 2012 17: 28
                        Quote: 22rus
                        born not in the vastness of Russia.

                        where was it born?
                      6. Kibb
                        0
                        28 June 2012 17: 24
                        Quote: 22rus
                        At the heart of all these systems are irrelevant roots.

                        A19? According to the Kahn’s ballistics, but everything else is Soviet and Kané is not German, and the caliber of 122 was originally Russian. Do you have three inches? The French idea - so and two divisional guns became the best in their history
                        Regimental - originally Danglis - Greek apparently of French origin.
                        Mortars according to the Stokes-Brandt scheme are a classic, but there are other equally good systems
                      7. Pessimist
                        0
                        29 June 2012 19: 28
                        Quote: 22rus
                        At the heart of all these systems are irrelevant roots.

                        Why are all non-domestic?
                        Russian divisional, famous three-inch! On the basis of its ballistics, even the tank guns L-10, L-11. The shape of the chamber and the cartridge were preserved even on the F-22. And the 45ka is really a Krupp 37mm PTP with a barrel bored to 45mm. Exactly as much as the barrel strength allowed! They tried to bring it up to 47mm, because the shells of this 47 caliber were still a dime a dozen in stock, but it didn't work out. (It is the huge quantities of old and 76mm shells that explain the desire of the designers to preserve the ballistics of the three-inch gun even in tank guns). Hence the "non-standard" 45mm caliber.
              2. Kibb
                +1
                27 June 2012 20: 05
                [quote = 22rus] ZIS-3 - constructor Grabin [/ quote]
                yes, only the balustka of this gun is not his - he only brought the division in such a caliber to perfection [
                quote = 22rus] D-1 - constructorPetrov [/ quote]
                Why didn’t the M10 get drunk? D1 is the M10 barrel on the M30 carriage
                [quote = 22rus] PTR - designer Simonov or Degtyarev. [/ quote]
                and who created the steam?
                [quote = 22rus] PPSh - Shpagin [/ quote]
                Do you know Shpagin’s designs?
                [quote = 22rus] That is. saying T-34, we immediately remember the name of Koshkin [/ quote]
                no, I still peck Firsogo and Dick
                1. 22rus
                  0
                  27 June 2012 20: 15
                  Everything is correct. KB is not one person. But the name of the listed systems is clearly tied to specific names. What can not be said about one of the most massive guns of the Second World War. Just "forty-five".
                  1. Kibb
                    +1
                    27 June 2012 20: 44
                    Loginov - are you talking about the Research Institute of Geophysics?
                    Quote: 22rus
                    KB is not one person
                    1. 22rus
                      +1
                      27 June 2012 20: 46
                      LOGINOV MIKHAIL NIKOLAEVICH (1903, Trans-Baikal province, village Kyra –1941.)
                      The designer of artillery weapons. Under his leadership, a 45-mm anti-aircraft gun, a 45-mm anti-tank gun of the 1937 model, a 76-mm semi-automatic anti-aircraft gun of the 1938 model, an 85-mm anti-aircraft gun of the 1939 model, a series of small-caliber automatic field and sea anti-aircraft artillery, in t h. 45, 37 and 25 mm automatic anti-aircraft guns and installations. USSR State Prize (1941, posthumous). Repressed in 1937, shot in January 1941 (as a Japanese and English spy).
                      1. Kibb
                        +1
                        27 June 2012 21: 08
                        Well what can I say, again, "Live and learn"
                        read about him too
                      2. TVK
                        0
                        16 July 2019 10: 23
                        It's not like that at all! You have to come up with this!
                      3. 0
                        30 September 2021 10: 48
                        Quote: 22rus
                        LOGINOV MIKHAIL NIKOLAEVICH (1903, Trans-Baikal province, village Kyra –1941.)
                        ...Repressed in 1937, shot in January 1941 (as a Japanese and English spy).

                        Wow, they lie, they lie! lol As the saying goes, "whoever whistles is a transvestite".
                        But what they write about Loginov's death in other sources:
                        However, tuberculosis, which worsened by the end of the summer of 1940, interfered with these plans. The plant's management decided to send Loginov to Crimea for treatment. Before leaving, Loginov handed over to the plant his theoretical developments with the performance characteristics of future guns and possible ways to increase their effectiveness for practical implementation over the next 10 years.
                        At the beginning of September Loginov left for Crimea to the Gornoe Solntse boarding house. Despite the efforts of doctors, he died on October 28, 1940.
                        On the initiative of the Black Sea Fleet, in memory of Loginov's merits in arming the Navy, it was decided to bury Loginov in Livadia.

                        On September 3, 2020, his ashes were reburied with military honors in Mytishchi at the Federal War Memorial Cemetery.
                  2. 0
                    27 June 2012 20: 51
                    Forty-five was developed on the basis of a 37 mm rheinmetal, by re-milling and finalizing the retractable device. As a result, an anti-tank piston of the 45 mm model of 1932 appeared. She had wooden wheels.
                    Then came the roadbots of anti-tank vehicles, which were put into service under the name: "45-mm model 1933", "45-mm model 1934", "45-mm model 1936", "45-mm model 1937", "45 -mm sample 1942 ". Only the names of the first sample and the last two took root, although they were all mass-produced and had different authors.
                    1. 22rus
                      0
                      27 June 2012 21: 17
                      Quote: Gamdlislyam
                      Only the names of the first sample and the last two took root, although they were all mass-produced and had different authors.


                      So I draw attention to the fact that next to such a famous gun is not the name of its designer.
  4. Vanya Ivanov
    +3
    27 June 2012 09: 54
    I don’t remember where I read it ... one soldier with a "forty-five" stopped a mech.column of Germans.
    and by the way was buried by the same Germans with military honors.
  5. admiral993
    +3
    27 June 2012 10: 31
    Vanya Ivanov most likely you mean Nikolay Vladimirovich Sirotinin. Senior Sergeant Gunner. Fight July 17, 1941. And the gun, right, forty
    1. -1
      27 June 2012 14: 18
      Sirotinin fought on F-22 (76mm.)
      1. 22rus
        0
        27 June 2012 15: 51
        Why did you get this?
        1. Kibb
          +2
          27 June 2012 16: 33
          And what's the difference in this case, here's a fact
          1. 22rus
            -2
            27 June 2012 17: 25
            Quote: Kibb
            And what's the difference in this case, here's a fact

            Apart from this fact (I mean the monument), everything else is a myth.
            1. Kibb
              +1
              27 June 2012 18: 13
              Quote: 22rus
              everything else is a myth.

              What is the myth? It is impossible to destroy 10-20 tanks from one gun with skillful operations of calculation and the presence of shells and not skillful actions of the commanders of these tanks? Seven girls, too, could not be destroyed by a platoon of seasoned soldiers, but they were destroyed - I hope you find the information yourself.
              Technique is one thing, but people are different
              They are not discussing Gastelo, Gastelo, but simply storming an army wave on a distant bomb is already a feat
              1. 22rus
                -1
                27 June 2012 18: 23
                Quote: Kibb
                What is the myth?

                The myth is the whole story of a lonely gunner.
                Quote: Kibb
                10-20 tanks cannot be destroyed from one gun with skillful operations of calculation and the presence of shells and not skillful actions of the commanders of these tanks?

                Yeah ... especially if the sight is an untrained and unfired first-year soldier, and on the other side are tankers of one of the Wehrmacht's best divisions. laughing
                Quote: Kibb
                Seven girls, too, could not be destroyed by a platoon of seasoned soldiers, but they were destroyed - I hope you find the information yourself.

                Something I do not know ...
                1. Kibb
                  0
                  27 June 2012 20: 31
                  Quote: 22rus
                  Something I do not know ...

                  it's so dumb to find old stuffing into the search engine "And the dawns here are quiet"
                  1. 22rus
                    0
                    27 June 2012 20: 44
                    There it is ...
                    And where are there 7 girls? Or the foreman Vaskov for two considered? laughing
                    And there was no platoon of enemies there, but only 16 people.
                    Well and most importantly - this is just a work of art. Reliable facts are not relevant.
                    1. Kibb
                      +1
                      27 June 2012 21: 12
                      Well, look, copy-paste nebuda, and 16 people are well-armed trained, and knowing what they are going to men - this is a force against girls who really did not hold a carbine in their hands
                      1. 22rus
                        0
                        27 June 2012 22: 16
                        Petty Officer Fedot Vaskov, fighters Zhenya Komelkova, Rita Osyanina, Lisa Brichkina, Galina Chetvertak and Sonya Gurvich.
                        5 girls and one man. And you talked about 7 girls ...
                        Quote: Kibb
                        16 people are well armed trained, and knowing what men are going to do - this is a force against girls who really did not hold a carbine in their hands

                        Well, yes ... foreman, a military man with military experience, of course, does not count.
                      2. Kibb
                        0
                        27 June 2012 22: 25
                        Quote: 22rus
                        Well, yes ... foreman, a military man with military experience, of course, does not count.

                        yes ... against 16 personnel paratroopers
                      3. 22rus
                        -1
                        27 June 2012 22: 39
                        Quote: Kibb
                        yes ... against 16 personnel paratroopers

                        And what do they regret their adversaries?
                        Again. This is a book. Good, but just a book. It is not worth seriously discussing the reality of the events described.
                        But the battle of Sirotinin, which is presented as reality, is broken down. The conclusion is a myth.
                      4. Kibb
                        0
                        28 June 2012 17: 07
                        Quote: 22rus
                        But the battle of Sirotinin, which is presented as reality, is broken down. The conclusion is a myth.

                        Well, what’s the difference? Was it Sirotin or not, how many tanks he knocked out, and the main thing is that the war ended in Berlin, Once again, the technique is one thing, but people are different
                      5. Pessimist
                        +1
                        29 June 2012 19: 35
                        Quote: 22rus
                        But the battle of Sirotinin, which is presented as reality, is broken down. The conclusion is a myth.

                        But Batmen and Spidermen are very real heroes! laughing Better our "mythical" heroes than theirs "super real" people! lol
                      6. 0
                        29 June 2012 22: 24
                        it is necessary to raise normal native heroes.
                      7. loc.bejenari
                        -1
                        28 June 2012 01: 32
                        what does the work of art
                        while watching Soviet films about the war, do not think that the Germans at 41 Tigers were -if they show the defense of Moscow and the ranks of the T44 converted to the Tigers are coming and the German infantry with the Kalashnikovs are running behind wink
                      8. Pessimist
                        0
                        29 June 2012 19: 40
                        Quote: loc.bejenari
                        rows of T44s converted to Tigers are coming and the German infantry with the Kalashnikovs are running behind

                        Well, why are you picking on props? Maybe they wanted to depict the T-4, because they also had long-barreled 75mm guns with a muzzle brake! And T-3, if anything, only two samples in the world remained in good condition.
              2. loc.bejenari
                -1
                28 June 2012 01: 39
                the order about the assault on a convoy of equipment on a high-altitude bomber cannot be called a crime against one’s own people
                people didn’t eat, worked to create an expensive car and train the crew
                as a result, an illiterate commander gives an order at the cost of a car in roughly 100000 rubles (I don’t know the exact price of a DB) to destroy, at best, taking into account the probability of a hit-1 tank for 10000 and a couple of cars for 500
                the literature cites data that 1 aircraft sorties were needed to destroy 2 tank using IL10
                and this is a specialized attack aircraft and not a high-altitude bomber
                this does not detract from the feat of pilots - on the contrary - they knew that they were sent to certain death
                1. Brother Sarych
                  0
                  29 June 2012 19: 52
                  It must be assumed that it was better to sit and watch the columns go east? Why death for certain? And not so many German fighters, and not entirely anti-aircraft guns ...
                  By the way, there weren’t so many tanks in those columns, more than ordinary cars, and they were not bombed on strategic bombers, but on the most ordinary ones ...
                  If necessary, they let the TB-3 go - and they already wrote that it was much harder to shoot them down than Simonov described ...
              3. 0
                28 June 2012 12: 27
                What is the myth? 10-20 tanks cannot be destroyed from one gun with skillful operations of calculation and the presence of shells and not skillful actions of the commanders of these tanks

                it’s possible, just the opposite, an ordinary (or sergeant) first year, without combat experience, one without calculation, and a crowd of at least lieutenants in tanks, with Poland and France behind ...
      2. 0
        28 June 2012 12: 17
        Sirotinin fought on F-22 (76mm.)
        and how did he alone manage with separate guidance, 3 hours, and even bring shells?
        unreal.
        45 hasn’t gone yet ...
  6. AlexMH
    +2
    27 June 2012 11: 09
    Very successful gun. Subtle, cheap, light. In the 42nd year was adopted by the new 45-mm gun with an increased barrel length and the initial velocity of the projectile. Note that the German counterpart - 37 mm cannon, was in service until the end of the war and was also produced in large quantities.
    1. 22rus
      -1
      27 June 2012 15: 52
      Wrong. Just the domestic 45-mm gun is an analogue of the German, and not vice versa.
    2. Kibb
      0
      27 June 2012 16: 45
      [quote = AlexMH] 37 mm gun, was in service until the end of the war [/ quote]
      what year did they stop releasing it?
      [quote = AlexMH] In the 42nd year, a new 45mm gun with an increased barrel length and an initial projectile speed was adopted. [/ quote]
      Yes, but it was also made on the basis of 53K [quote = 22rus] Just the domestic 45-mm gun is an analogue of the German, and not vice versa. [/ Quote How can this not be known?
  7. +1
    27 June 2012 11: 43
    The gun is good, and, frankly speaking, our soldiers were very helpful in the first year of the war, when there were almost no PT guns. But the shells to it, unfortunately, were of poor quality. By the way, one of the Wehrmacht’s best tankers, Otto Carius, was first hit precisely by the forty-fifth and then lost all his teeth (Tigers in the mud), but he then fought on a Czech tank.
    1. Pessimist
      -1
      29 June 2012 19: 43
      Quote: Trapper7
      but then he still fought on a Czech tank

      Quote: Trapper7
      Otto Carius was first hit precisely forty

      And besides, they directly slapped him in the forehead !!! I saw the photo.
  8. +1
    27 June 2012 13: 55
    “The set of ammunition consisted of unitary cartridges with armor-piercing, sub-caliber and armor-piercing tracer shells, fragmentation grenades, as well as unitary cartridges with buckshot. When meeting at a right angle at a distance of 500 meters, they penetrated 43-millimeter armor, and at a distance of 1 km - 32-millimeter. fire - 500 millimeters. In the first year of the war, these indicators were enough to destroy all types of Wehrmacht tanks. "
    Where did the sub-caliber projectile come from in 1941 !? They were introduced in 1943. Or did the author Beshanov and Rezun take "reliable" information as a source?
  9. loc.bejenari
    +3
    27 June 2012 15: 39
    good article
    By the way, in the production photo, the gun is in the normal position - the barrel is horizontal
    on the rest - the gun is not clear where it is aiming - the barrel in a howitzer position - which is a priori impossible for it
    and in our films this immediately catches the eye
    especially struck the Shtrafbat - where guns fire at tanks at an angle of elevation of the barrel of 30 degrees - so only at targets closed behind the hill they shoot from howitzers
    1. +2
      3 March 2014 21: 19
      Quote: loc.bejenari
      especially struck the penalty box
      Well, "Penal battalion" is generally something. I have never seen more dregs in my life, not just an army, but some kind of gang.
  10. +2
    27 June 2012 15: 53
    this gun was often called "Goodbye Homeland".
  11. -1
    27 June 2012 16: 49
    Yes exactly! for for leaving the enemy to be shot!
    1. 77bor1973
      -1
      27 June 2012 20: 04
      Because there was a calculation, 12 people!
  12. 0
    27 June 2012 17: 35
    And when did she (the gun) have a normal barrel ?, Tell me, please! Not that stump, but really - the trunk.
    1. 22rus
      +2
      27 June 2012 17: 46
      Quote: Bugor
      And when did she (the gun) have a normal barrel?

      At first (in 1931), the native German trunk was 37 mm. Then ours thought about increasing the power of the gun. They did it very simply: they began to bore their own trunk to the maximum possible diameter. It turned out 45 mm. They began to think where to get shells for such a caliber. In warehouses, even in the times of the WWII, a significant number of shells from the 47-mm gun of Hotchkiss remained. These shells with a sharpened lead belt and became the first ammunition for the 45-mm anti-tank missile. And in the 37th year, the gun went into series. In 1942, when modern Lend-Lease equipment began to arrive, it became possible to further modernize the Magpie. The gun received a new longer barrel and new ammunition.
      1. Kibb
        0
        27 June 2012 21: 49
        so kago h ... here they were crucified - you know how 45mm appeared, another question is that the cast-iron shell is not steel at all
  13. gercog_75
    +2
    27 June 2012 17: 55
    design 45 is taken from the German pak-36. Ours changed two things, this is the caliber and set a vertical wedge lock instead of a horizontal. until the age of 43, she completely coped with her duties.
  14. 0
    27 June 2012 18: 52
    The losses in the PTA were huge. Even for double salary no one wanted in the PTA.
  15. Odinplys
    0
    28 June 2012 08: 20
    Maneuverable ... light ... the fascists liked it ...
  16. 0
    28 June 2012 12: 42
    inconspicuous, small, very accurate, undermined and 40 cm in height, excellent weapon to the ends of the war ...
    1. 0
      28 June 2012 18: 19
      Toward the end of the war, it was already used as a modern grenade launcher - fragmentation at firing points. From the middle of the war no one has fired at tanks from it. Whatever you say - a successful gun turned out.
  17. 0
    10 February 2023 02: 12
    The article is good, but, like many others, it leaves a white spot in the history of the armament of the Red Army and this white spot is gigantic. Read the story of the designer Loginov M.N., the creator of the legendary anti-tank gun "forty-five" and all anti-aircraft artillery of the Second World War.
    TOOLS THAT SAVE THE COUNTRY IN 1941.
    https://max659.livejournal.com/888.html

  18. 0
    10 February 2023 02: 17
    In the Pantheon of Defenders of the Fatherland in Mytishchi, a monument was erected to the designer of the WEAPONS OF VICTORY Loginov Mikhail Nikolaevich.
  19. 0
    10 February 2023 02: 20
    The reburial ceremony of the ashes of the outstanding Soviet designer Mikhail Nikolaevich Loginov took place at the Federal War Memorial Cemetery of the Russian Ministry of Defense. The name of the specialist is included in the book “Russian gunsmiths. The creators of the weapons of Victory. All anti-aircraft guns with which our army was armed during the Great Patriotic War were created under his leadership.