Weapons of the Second World. Aircraft machine guns

30

Which of the machine guns listed in the article can be called the best?

Type 89-2 - 0 (0%)
0%
Vickers E - 0 (0%)
0%
Breda-SAFAT - 1 (0.56%)
0.56%
MAC 1934A - 0 (0%)
0%
MG-131 / 8 - 38 (21.23%)
21.23%
SHKAS - 113 (63.13%)
63.13%
Browning 0.30 M2-AN - 27 (15.08%)
15.08%
The first thing we decided to start with was aviation machine guns. Yes, if we talk about an airplane, then it is a very complex thing and consists of many parts. Engines and weapons will be our focus.

Let's start with weapons and machine gun rifle caliber. It is clear, because the machine gun was the main thing. A large-caliber machine guns and guns - this is the second time. Although no less interesting.



Weapons of the Second World. Aircraft machine guns


But at the time of the outbreak of World War II, the main masses of fighters of all countries were cheerfully cheating with machine guns of rifle calibers. Yes, who had guns, they were with guns. But a rifle-caliber machine gun is an indispensable and indispensable attribute of the time. So let's start with them.

Deliberately we will not set them apart, sharing the best / worst. Let's do it you.

So, let's start!

1. ShKAS. the USSR


ShKAS many consider the achievement of domestic design armory schools. And not without reason. Yes, over the years that have passed since the creation of the machine gun, the number of legends and tales about ShKAS is simply amazing, quantitatively, qualitatively.



But we’ll talk about legends another time, now we’ll note that the machine gun was really more than outstanding in some respects and constructive solutions. Incredible at that time, the rate of fire was provided precisely by the drum cartridge supply system invented by Shpitalny. The main majority of weapon assemblies were designed by the Tula arms engineer of the pre-revolutionary school Irinarkh Andreyevich Komaritsky.

The Spit and Komaritsky machine gun was seriously different from the classical schemes of the time. The main highlight is that the developers were able to turn the main inconvenience of an outdated domestic cartridge with a flange flange into dignity.

Due to the presence of the flange, the cartridge could roll along the helical groove of the drum and remove it from the belt and feed it in 10 shots.

ShKAS was a universal machine gun. By 1934, the wing and turret versions were mastered, and from 1938, a synchronous model was also installed on the aircraft.

The use of a synchronizer somewhat reduced the rate of fire, up to 1650 shots per minute, the wing and turret versions had a rate of fire 1800-1850 shots per minute. But on the synchronous version to compensate, the barrel was extended by 150 mm, which gave better ballistics.

Advantages: the best rate of fire at the time in the world, good ballistics cartridge.

Disadvantages: complex design and high cost. The machine gun was very capricious of pollution, there were more than 30 types of delays when shooting.


2. Browning 0.30 M2-AN. USA


It is a pity, of course, that John Browning did not live to see the moment when his offspring began a solemn procession across countries and continents. But Browning died in the 1926 year, and the machine gun fell on the wing in the 1929.



In general, the fate of the machine gun was not easy. The adoption of the M2 coincided with the onset of the Great Depression in the United States and the subsequent financial crisis. All new military developments were curtailed, and the production of machine guns M2 went unhurried pace until the beginning of the 2-th world war.

It looks like today, but in another country, isn't it? But yes, the export rescued. And not just rescued. The Belgians were the first to buy a license, and FN began to produce the FN38 / 39 machine gun with minimal changes.

In 1935, the British were joined by the Belgians, worn out with the Vickers. The British pretty worked on the machine gun and made a lot of changes to the M2, including adjusting the caliber. “Browning 0.303. Mk II ”became the basis of aviation weapons in the UK during the 2 World War II.

By the beginning of the 2 World War II in the United States, the caliber of 7,62-mm (0,3 inches) was considered insufficient to arm the aircraft. And the M2 began to give way to another machine gun, ".50 Browning AN / M2".

By 1943, 7,62-mm Browning М2-AN was finally removed from combat use and was used as a weapon for firing training in the training of pilots.

But nevertheless, he played a very significant role in the war, since ALL, without exception, American planes launched before 1941 were armed with this machine gun.

The release of the Browning MXNUM-AN machine gun is estimated at more than half a million pieces, including licensing ones.

Advantages: low weight, reliability, excellent rate of fire, good ballistics.

Disadvantages: a rather complicated scheme (Browning differed in this).


3. MAC 1934. France


"I blinded him!" Just blinded, without continuing. The machine gun is very, very peculiar, more than ten years have passed since the beginning of work and before putting it into service. But the French needed a machine gun for aviation, and now ...



Designers from the state arsenal of Chatellerault decided to create a new weapon for France, using the achievements of their company "Berthier" and the American "Browning".

So in 1934, the version of the MAC machine gun Mle1931 was virtually unchanged and put into service with French aircraft under the designation MAC 1934.

The machine gun was intended for installation on all aircraft, but for the first time it was intended for installation in the wing.

Here, the French staged a show that will actually remain in the annals of aviation weapons stories.

According to the idea of ​​the designers, the MAC 1934A (wing) was supposed to carry out ammunition from ... stores! For this, hefty drum shops for 300 or 500 cartridges were designed. So far, these monsters confidently hold (soon 100 will mark the years) first place among all the shops of all times and peoples. No one has surpassed by volume.



It is clear that the aircraft designers were just happy to invent all sorts of fairings for these monsters, since these drums did not fit into one normal wing. Or, as an option, have the machine guns sideways, which caused ardent love among gunsmith technicians. Yes, also the drive for feeding the cartridges was pneumatic, through a gear pair ...

Very interesting machine gun ...

For the use of a machine gun as a defensive weapon of the bombers, the “tiny” shops on 150 and 100 cartridges were invented.

After a few years, having been fed up with this perversion, the French still decided that it was necessary to be funny about tape feeding. And then fate made them a present in the person of the I-15bis with a Spanish pilot, who fell into their hands through a flight from Spain, where the civil war ended.

The French have carefully studied the ShKAS and ... just tore off at 101% the cartridge supply system!

And - lo and behold! - France has a normal machine gun! Which was put on all French fighters and bombers until the moment France ended in the war. This is the “Chatellerault MAC 1934 Mle39” with tape feed. Used as a cloth tape, and metal. The rest - MAS 1934 and ShKAS.

Advantages: high rate of fire (French sources say about 1400-1500 rds / min, but modern experts say that the real numbers are 1200-1300 rds / min).

Disadvantages: like all similar structures did not differ reliability.


The ballistics was average due to the low initial velocity of the bullet, which was partially offset by the barrel length, but partially.

4. MG-131 / 8. Germany


In terms of machine guns, of course, the large-caliber product of the Rheinmetall concern was more than known. The compact heavy machine gun MG.131 was produced in turret, synchronous and wing versions.



But we are not talking about the MG.131 itself, but about the MG.131 / 8, the transition model of the 7,92-mm caliber. They passed from the MG.15 and MG.17 machine guns, from which they inherited the construction of the majority of units and the principle of operation.

The history of fine-tuning the machine gun took three whole years (which is generally uncharacteristic for the Germans) and the machine gun came into service only at the end of 1941 of the year.

The machine gun can be called the next generation of weapons. The device used a system of electric ignition of the primer, which significantly affected the rate of fire of the weapon. The recharge was double electropneumatic. The machine gun was really bilateral, that is, by rearranging several parts, it was possible to change the direction of movement of the tape. The electropneumatic charging mechanism could also be rearranged from one side to the other, which greatly facilitated life when mounting the machine gun in the wings or in the synchronous version.

Beginning with the 1942, MG.131 / 8 confidently registered as a synchronous machine gun under the hood of Messerschmitt fighters Bf-109 and Focke-Wulf FW-190. It was produced by confident parties until the end of the war, and if the fighters gradually switched to the large-caliber version, then the bombers on the turrets and in the MG-131 / 8 tower installations were installed until the very end of the war.

And even after the end of production in the 1944 year (more than 60 thousand pieces were produced in all), the machine guns unclaimed in aviation were easily converted into manual guns and transferred to the Wehrmacht. The system of electric ignition of the machine gun was changed to a standard firing mechanism, the machine gun was completed with bipods and a shoulder rest or with a machine tool.

Advantages: high rate of fire, excellent ballistics, the best initial speed of a bullet, reliability.

Disadvantages: heavy in the complete set with electro-running and reloading and feeding mechanism.


5. Breda-safat. Italy


The Italian forge of weapons is something. These are “Beretta”, “Breda”, “Benelli” and so on. This is the design thought of higher flight. And, frankly, the implementation is so-so. Perhaps the culprit Italian disorder. However, judge for yourself.



Società Italiana Ernesto Breda is one of the oldest in Italy. It was founded in 1886 in Milan. That's just not producing weapons, and locomotives. But here Ernesto Breda decided that the designer was not the only person who was alive with the locomotive and started creating weapons.

Having trained the personnel on the licensed assembly of the FIAT-Revelli M1914 machine gun, Breda went further. And he presented himself to Mussolini himself (Breda financed the party of fascists, so everything is logical here) the design of the machine gun.

Mussolini gave the command not only to start production without waiting for the test results, but also to produce two machine guns at once, with different calibers, 7,7 and 12,7-mm. We will look at the heavy machine gun in the next article (everything was very sad with it), but the original, 7,7-mm, turned out to be quite to itself. The product is called "Breda-SAFAT".



Machine guns Breda-SAFAT installed on almost all types of combat aircraft produced in Italy until the debugging of the large-caliber version. That is, until 1942. But what was normal for 30's (2 7,7-mm synchronous machine guns) has become nothing at all since the beginning of the war.

In general, the Italians are not lucky. 7,7-mm machine guns quickly disappeared from the scene at the beginning of the war, and with further developments on larger calibers simply did not have time, and the war ended for Italy.

But on the ground, machine guns Breda-SAFAT, oddly enough, served until the 70s of the last century as anti-aircraft guns.

Advantages: reliability and reliability.

Disadvantages: weak ballistics, low initial velocity of the bullet.


6. Vickers E. United Kingdom


This machine gun has been released a lot. According to various estimates at least 100 thousand. But war is not only quantity, but also quality. And here we have in two ways.



Once, at the end of the 19 - the beginning of the 20 century, the English armament was considered the best in the world, but English conservatism ruined a lot, including this. The British gunsmiths were, after all, in many ways the foremost guys, having invented a loose machine gun belt, a hydraulic synchronizer and a defensive turret for bombers, the so-called "Scarff Ring". But machine guns ... Yes, there was a reliable and reliable Vickers Mk.I, but still it is essentially a modified "Maxim".

At the very beginning of the 20 century, the British corporation Vickers bought out the patents of the American engineer Hiram Maxim. Bringing the machine gun to perfection with the inherent British thoroughness, the British army adopted the Vickers Mk.I.

Life machine gun in a series of modifications was very long. But the paradox, in Britain itself, he did not take root. The British military department chose to adjust the licensed release of the Browning machine gun.

And Vickers had a pretty long life in license execution. Polish, Czech, Australian and Japanese machine guns, with a greater or lesser degree of success, fought almost the entire war.

Advantages: simplicity, reliability.

Disadvantages: low rate of fire, not the best ballistics.


7. Type 89-2. Japan


Japan has become a victim of its friendship with Britain. In the prewar period, the role of the main aviation machine gun was firmly occupied by the Vickers class E caliber 7,7 mm, the export version of the Vickers Mk.V.



Naval aviation also adopted its Vickers aircraft. It is worth remembering that unlike many countries in Japan, naval aviation was a separate force. The downside was that in addition to machine guns, Japanese forces were forced to buy ammunition for them. Japanese aviation was very dependent on imports.

From 1929 to 1932, the Vickers E machine gun was produced under the designation “Type 89 model 1”. But later it was replaced with the new model “Type 89 model 2”, in which it was possible to use both the old cartridge “Type 89” and the new “Type 92”.

The machine gun "Type 89 model 2" was produced in large series until the very end of the Second World War. It is clear that even at the beginning of the war the machine gun did not meet modern requirements. But the conservatism of the Japanese is quite comparable with the conservatism of the British, so the "89 Type 2 model" fought to the very end of Japan.

The machine gun was used in synchronous installations of Japanese fighters and light bombers of almost all types. His main "chip" was that in synchronous performance, he almost did not lose the rate of fire in comparison with the wing version.

Naval aviation used the same machine gun at the same time as their land colleagues, but unlike them, licensing agreements did not bother at all. Before 1936, Japanese naval pilots used purchased machine guns, and only after they started to produce the 97 Type machine gun, which differed little from the 89 Type 2 model.

Advantages: reliability and practicality of "Vickers".

Disadvantages: Vickers flaws.




And who was the best?

Sources:
Yevgeny Aranov. Browning aircraft machine guns.
Alexander Shirokorad. The history of aviation weapons.
Yevgeny Aranov. Aircraft weapons in Germany.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    19 May 2019 05: 24
    Actually, if they didn’t lie, there was ShKAS in Hitler’s reception room .. as a reproach to the German gunsmiths who could not create something like that
    1. +8
      19 May 2019 07: 01
      Quote: Nathanael
      as a reproach to the German gunsmiths who failed to create something like this

      Since 1938, the Germans mass-produced the MG.81 machine gun, which had a rate of fire of more than 1600m / min and a weight of 6,5kg.
    2. +4
      19 May 2019 10: 10
      Quote: Nathanael
      Actually, if they didn’t lie, there was ShKAS in Hitler’s reception room .. as a reproach to the German gunsmiths who could not create something like that

      hi If they are not lying, then about the allegedly discovered "ShKAS, under glass and with a" reproachful inscription of the Fuehrer "in the Hitlerite Reich Chancellery" are these only "Tales" by Boris Gavrilovich Shpitalny himself ?!
      I first learned about this supposedly "Reich chancellery" from the Tekhnika-Molodezhi magazine in 1973, a series of articles on Soviet small arms edited by B.G. Shpitalnym-all the other, ironic and non-ironic, sources of this "story (IMHO)" one way or another refer to the same author!
      Having survived and left their memories, the navigators of the MBR-2 and DB-3 (3F-Il-4) aircraft, which had to use ShKAS turret machine guns, even in censored Soviet memoir literature noted their tendency to frequent failures at the most crucial and tense moments of air combat (Obviously costing the lives of those many who could no longer leave their memoirs ?!).
    3. 0
      25 May 2019 21: 38
      Nonsense, nothing and no one confirmed, a weapon of victory appeared in the book
  2. +8
    19 May 2019 06: 32
    Disadvantages: complex design and high cost. The machine gun was very capricious of pollution, there were more than 30 types of delays when shooting.
    And ShKAS required special cartridges.
    "The delays that arose when firing from the ShKAS with ordinary cartridges (dismantling and breaking the cartridge, dropping the primer, sinking the bullet into the sleeve, destruction of the primer composition) were caused precisely by inertial overloads. Eliminating most of the above delays required disassembling the machine gun, which, of course, during the flight The imperfection of the cartridges endangered the pilot's life and the fulfillment of the combat mission. Perfectly designed weapons, as it turned out, outperformed the cartridges they fired - a rather rare phenomenon in the history of weapon technology. Their development was undertaken by a team of designers headed by NM Elizarov. By the mid-30s, the work was completed and, as a result, 7,62-mm cartridges for the ShKAS machine gun appeared. " http://weaponland.ru/publ/patrony_dlja_sverkhpulemjota/13-1-0-779
    1. +4
      19 May 2019 09: 37
      As a result, ShKAS can hardly be called a successful machine gun - the task was to create a machine gun for an existing cartridge with a rim, because of this we went to complicate the design, which did not add reliability, but as a result, this machine gun did not really work with an ordinary rifle cartridge ....
  3. +1
    19 May 2019 06: 48
    The authors are outrageously concise. Waiting for comments.
    PS The quality of aviation weapons in my opinion at Shavrov was estimated as the ratio of the second volley to the mass of weapons.
    1. +3
      19 May 2019 11: 23
      Quote: mr.ZinGer
      the quality of aviation weapons in my opinion at Shavrov was estimated as the ratio of the second volley to the mass of weapons.

      Too easy.
      1. The weapon begins with a cartridge. About half-word cartridges. The edge of the Soviet (Russian) sleeve came out of the corner, a similar problem of the English cartridge was not mentioned at all. When the authors get to the CCP, this approach will be completely acidic.
      2. Reliability. Perhaps the main characteristic of weapons. A mediocre specimen with absolute reliability will always be preferable to a prodigy with one delay of 200 shots. Here and the weapon itself, and the installation of reloading systems.
      3. With regard to aircraft weapons. Synchronization. Mentioned systems in different ways lose their rate of fire during synchronization. This affects the choice of a central or wing armament layout.
  4. +5
    19 May 2019 08: 56
    The French have carefully studied the ShKAS and ... just tore off at 101% the cartridge supply system!
    I would like to ask the authors a question - where else, apart from the article on "Corner of Heaven", did they meet such a statement.

    The work of the revolving mechanism for supplying the ShKAS machine gun was based on a sleeve with a rim.
    The French cartridge 7,5 × 54 mm MAS, as can be seen in the photo, had no flange. Therefore, copying the feed mechanism will not work here. Yes, this is not necessary. Waferless sleeve allows you to solve the issue of rate of fire and without such tricks.
    1. +5
      19 May 2019 09: 06

      This is how the ShKAS machine gun feed mechanism looks like
      1. +4
        19 May 2019 09: 10

        And so the feed mechanism of the French machine gun.
    2. +5
      19 May 2019 10: 25
      hi Honestly, this phrase about a 101% copied cartridge system for feeding cartridges also introduced me into a short-term stupor due to the many surging options of its likely use and manufacturing technology of mating surfaces (instead of a technological and resistant to damage internal groove under the welt, which is very fragile and largely non-technological thin screw ledge under the groove of the sleeve). Up to assumptions about the special fabrication by the French of their old Lebel-style welded cartridge, but with reinforced bullet mount and increased sensitivity of the capsule composition! Maybe it was so ?! smile
  5. +7
    19 May 2019 09: 24
    there was a reliable and trouble-free Vickers Mk.I, but still it is essentially a modified "Maxim".
    In the USSR, so to speak, there was a "restyling" of the "Maxim" machine gun, this PV-1 was produced until 1940. In the design of Nadashkevich, the "maxim" automatics were retained (recoil energy was used with a short barrel stroke). The aircraft machine gun differed from the easel in its lower weight, achieved by turning the barrel, the introduction of air cooling and a power system designed for firing from a metal link belt. The trigger was adapted for synchronized firing. To increase the rate of fire of the machine gun, the diameter of the muzzle sleeve was reduced and a buffer spring was introduced, which imparted an additional speed to the moving system when it moves forward and took a blow when it retreated. The spring buffer was first used in an aviation machine gun both in our country and abroad. As a result of design changes introduced to the machine gun, the rate of fire increased from 600 to 750 rounds per minute.
  6. +2
    19 May 2019 10: 43
    it would be nice to place a vote at the end of articles
    1. 0
      19 May 2019 15: 32
      This is technically impossible on this site engine.
      1. +4
        19 May 2019 16: 27
        It’s a pity, because the majority of people vote without even understanding the performance characteristics and without reading
  7. +2
    19 May 2019 10: 57
    Shkas is the most perfect sample (my opinion). cartridges for him ?, a product of the problems of our industry ... PV-1, Browning, vickers, as well as the Japanese, should probably be compared separately, like maxim clones. And where is YES?
    The article is not complete uninformative. In the photo PV-1.
  8. +1
    19 May 2019 12: 02

    hi ........ Browning MKII vs. Vickers
    ... For some reason, it is not said about Browning M2 50 cal.

    ... in B-17, there are 12 of them. It was................ soldier
    1. 0
      19 May 2019 12: 19
      Quote: san4es
      ... For some reason, it is not said about Browning M2 50 cal.

      feel ... I was not attentive ... Large caliber - "next time".
  9. +2
    19 May 2019 12: 13
    And why the article does not say anything about the MG-81, MG-17 ?!
  10. +3
    19 May 2019 13: 54
    The Spit and Komaritsky machine gun was seriously different from the classical schemes of the time. The main highlight is that the developers were able to turn the main inconvenience of an outdated domestic cartridge with a flange flange into dignity.

    Due to the presence of the flange, the cartridge could roll along the helical groove of the drum and remove it from the belt and feed it in 10 shots.

    Doubtful dignity. It was necessary to stretch the extraction from the tape because the flange did not allow the cartridge to be fed from the link forward, and when jerking back at this speed, the cartridge was unprotected or even ruptured. But even stretching did not help - I had to make cartridges with a steel sleeve and reinforced dulce. Then, with the introduction of the synchronizer, it turned out that the shot does not always happen fast enough, and we had to select especially high-quality cartridges for the synchronous version and mark it in a special way. So the main goal, for the sake of which the design was complicated - the unification of ammunition with other small arms - was not achieved.
  11. +13
    19 May 2019 14: 08
    Yes, the swing was "ruble". The authors represented terabytes of information about the weapons of the Second World War, the people were salivating in anticipation of consuming these terabytes ...
    The first to decide on the table was to deliver rifle caliber machine guns. Absolutely legitimate.
    Given the variety of samples, several parts suggest themselves, each of which is dedicated to a certain country, since even Switzerland and Czechoslovakia were noted by interesting models on this field, and the leading aviation powers had several of them.
    Alas and ah! Instead of the expected terabytes, readers received an extremely "dried up and worn out" retelling of articles from "Corner of Heaven", diluted by the author's emotional escapades and it is completely incomprehensible by what criteria the list compiled for "voting", in which German aircraft rifle caliber machine guns are not represented at all. Machine guns MG15, MG17, MG81 missing. But there is MG 131/8, which cannot be attributed to rifle-caliber machine guns in any way due to the fact that it was designed for the 7,92 x 82 mm cartridge, which was a modification of the standard 13x64 sleeve, compressed to a 7.92-mm rifle bullet. While maintaining the powder charge from large-caliber weapons, the mass of the bullet was reduced by 3.5 times - 11.55 g instead of 38 grams. Thus, a significant increase in the initial speed (1130 - 1160 m / s) and the aiming range of the weapon was achieved. A kind of hybrid.
    Many samples were excluded from the "competition", leaving seven pieces according to completely incomprehensible criteria. And the "disqualified" is worse?
    I especially want to note in the sources the presence of the famous Shirokorad compiler, because it does not apply to specialists in the field of aviation weapons at all. He is far from them.
    So the terabyte mega-intrigue ended in a megapix. If things go on like this, we can safely "turn down hopes."
    1. +1
      19 May 2019 15: 36
      Quote: Undecim
      Many samples were excluded from the "competition", leaving seven pieces according to completely incomprehensible criteria. And the "disqualified" is worse?

      By the way, I also wanted to say a couple of affectionate ones on this topic, but the introduction to the voting ballot is formulated quite cleverly:
      Which of the machine guns listed in the articlecan be called the best?

      So I thought and did not write anything.
  12. +2
    19 May 2019 18: 44
    An interesting point about aviation machine guns.
    In 2011, a Spitfire fighter was found in a peat bog near the Irish town of Donegal, which crashed in 1941. The plane's engine stalled, the pilot jumped out with a parachute, the car fell into the swamp and crashed, so the plane was taken out of the swamp in parts.
    They also removed all the Browning .303 Mark II machine guns with which the Spitfires were armed.

    The Irish military decided to check whether machine guns would fire.
    Of the six found, they collected one that worked like new.
    1. +2
      19 May 2019 18: 50

      This is assembled from the details of six Browning .303 Mark II machine guns on an impromptu machine during test firing.
      1. +2
        19 May 2019 19: 26
        I won’t say anything about machine guns, but I know from people who started working with him back in the 4s when I started working with an IL-70 shot down in Karelia.
        I love ShKAS, at least for the fact that it narrows the search circle when discussing versions for identifying an aircraft during search operations.

  13. 0
    19 May 2019 21: 41
    The article, as the information is necessary and interesting, but superficial and not finalized. The volume is small. Tell me how to attach photos!
    1. Alf
      +1
      19 May 2019 22: 13
      Click Answer. The Rectangle icon with a mountain pops up, click on it, a window pops up suggesting you to download a picture from the Web with the URL and Download from computer. Choose the second one, specify the path from which library to load, check the Save box and press Enter.
      Phew, writing longer than loading a picture.
  14. 0
    20 May 2019 07: 50
    Hitler’s SHKAS was under glass with the inscription: HOW IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO MAKE MACHINES!
  15. +1
    20 May 2019 09: 35
    Zamah, in the sense of design, was a million,
    and the blow, in the sense of the fact, - on the ruble!
    A grand cycle of articles was promised.
    But judging by the first, which otherwise than an educational program, and even then not by all samples (where YES, for example) can not be called, we will face disappointment ahead.
    Glad to be wrong ...