PC-28 "Sarmat". Technical features and political implications

31
At 2021, the adoption of a new missile system with an intercontinental ballistic missile RS-28 Sarmat is planned. Currently new weapon passes the test cycle, and the main part of the data on it remains secret. However, official sources have already managed to disclose some of the information about the project, thanks to which the main features and capabilities of the promising rocket have become known. Available data make it possible to understand why the Sarmat ICBM poses a particular danger to a potential adversary.

Over the past few years, the command of the strategic missile forces, as well as the military and political leadership of the country have repeatedly raised the topic of the Sarmat project and read out various information about it. As a result, it became known that in the 2021, the RVSN will receive a new complex with a heavy-class missile, characterized by the highest characteristics. Such a weapon is intended to replace the old RV-36M Voevoda and must use the same launchers.



Global weapon

It is known that the new PC-28 rocket has an improved propulsion system, which gives it the highest characteristics. In the past, the positive qualities of the Sarmat, provided by new efficient engines, have been repeatedly noted. It is the engines that can increase the combat stability and effectiveness of combat work.



Due to the greater engine thrust, the PC-28 product differs from the previous domestic-made liquid ICBMs by the reduced duration of the active flight segment. This fact in a certain way complicates the work of the enemy's missile defenses, attacking a target during acceleration, when it is most noticeable and vulnerable. In addition, this leads to the fact that during acceleration and entering the Sarmat trajectory, it remains in a safe zone, inaccessible to enemy missile defense.

New engines (perhaps in combination with certain types of combat equipment) give the rocket increased range characteristics. For example, back in 2014, Deputy Defense Minister Yury Borisov said that the new missile system had virtually no range limitations. Sarmatian combat units will be able to fly to their targets through the North or South Pole. In the future, this information was confirmed by President Vladimir Putin. According to him, in terms of firing range, the new ICBM RS-28 surpasses the existing P-36M. However, as in the past, and now accurate data on the range of flight is not available.

For some time now, the term “global weapon” has been used in reference to Sarmat. Indeed, the new propulsion system, in combination with various types of combat equipment, significantly increases the range of the missile system. Not only the territory of expected potential adversaries, but also other areas of the globe is in the area of ​​responsibility of Russian missiles. The practical value of such weapons is obvious.

A good ball

In the course of the sensational last year’s address to the Federal Assembly, V. Putin said that the Sarmat would be able to carry a wide range of high-capacity nuclear munitions. In terms of the number and power of warheads, it will surpass the "Governor." It also provides the possibility of using promising hypersonic planning combat units - a fundamentally new combat equipment with unique characteristics and capabilities.

From the presidential statements, it follows that in the version of the carrier of the traditional split head with the units of individual guidance, the PC-28 will be able to carry at least 10 warheads. The power of each warhead is at least 800 CT. However, it is not quite clear how exactly the “Sarmat” will surpass the “Governor” in the number and power of the warheads and the composition of the fighting squadrons. Along with warheads, false targets and other means of overcoming missile defense must be present at the head. Declared the use of modern systems that provide a breakthrough through existing and promising defense complexes.



Of particular interest is the version of the PC-28 complex with the Avangard hypersonic maneuvering combat unit. So far, such products are used with the UR-100N UTTH missiles, but in the future they will be transferred to modern Sarmatians. According to known data, the Avangard product is a hypersonic glider with its own warhead, launched using ICBMs. Previously, domestic missile systems were not equipped with similar products.

According to recent statements, in flight the Avangard glider can reach speeds of up to M = 27. He carries a special warhead and is able to deliver it to the intercontinental range. Planning a flight with the ability to perform maneuvers makes it impossible to effectively intercept using existing air defense systems and missile defense. At the same time, increased accuracy of target destruction is provided.

In all likelihood, in the future, the Sarmat ICBM will take up combat duty with different combat equipment options. Nevertheless, the exact composition of the head parts and the proportions of different products in the general grouping remain unknown, and they are unlikely to be disclosed in the foreseeable future.

Safe duty

From open data it follows that the ICBM RS-28 "Sarmat" is a landmark development of its own kind. It is obvious that missiles with enhanced combat characteristics are becoming a priority target for the first strike from a likely enemy. Such risks are taken into account when developing new Russian weapons. As far as is known, in parallel with the “Sarmat”, new means are being created for the operation and protection of missiles.

In the future, missiles of the new type will be placed in existing mine launchers exempted from obsolete weapons. Such structures themselves have a high class of protection against direct impact, and in addition, must be equipped with additional means. In 2013, work was resumed on the subject of active protection complexes for silo missile complexes. In the past, such a system has confirmed its capabilities in practice, and in the future, production models of this kind will have to ensure the protection of the Sarmatians on duty.



With the implementation of all current plans, the silo complex of the Sarmat complex will become an extremely difficult target for the first strike of the enemy, capable of maintaining a high probability and providing a counter attack. In the event of a flying warhead of an ICBM or other enemy means of destruction, KAZ will be forced to knock it down at a safe distance. If the ammunition can pass through the protection system, the rocket will remain intact thanks to a solid launcher. It should be noted that the methods of passive protection of silos and ICBMs have been worked out for a long time, while the active protection complexes are new.

Threat from the future

The PC-28 Sarmat product is a serious threat to a potential adversary, but all the risks associated with it are still problems of the future. The first missiles of the new type will take over on duty in the 2021 year, and a full replacement of obsolete P-36M will take place only a few years after that. Thus, in the coming years, the existing ICBM will hold back the potential adversary.

Nevertheless, the moment of adopting “Sarmat” into service is approaching, and the industry is doing everything necessary for this. In a new message to the Federal Assembly from February 20, V. Putin mentioned the continuation of testing of the PC-28 product, but did not go into details. On the same day, the TV channel Zvezda published some data on the current successes of the project.

Last year, the success of the new missile test phase ended. In the course of these works, fifty design and test tasks were performed. It was possible to confirm the correctness of the constructive solutions used in the project. Were also conducted bench tests of engines for the rocket. Practical work on the stage of breeding.

At the same time, industry is being prepared for the mass production of missiles and objects of the Ministry of Defense for new tests. Thus, the infrastructure for flight and state tests of the Sarmat is being completed at the Plesetsk test site. The enterprises involved in the project are updating their production facilities, which in the future will allow them to participate in the assembly of an experimental batch of missiles, and then master the series.



This year, the first test launch of the new rocket is to take place at the Plesetsk test site, followed by a full-fledged flight and the defeat of a conventional target at the Kamchatka Kura test site. Flight tests should be completed in 2020-21, after which the missile complex will be adopted. Next will begin full-fledged mass production with the production of missiles on duty.

It is in 2021 that the ICBM RS-28 will begin to realize their potential and will become a new military-political tool. First, they will solve common problems together with outdated Р-36М, but then they will completely override them and fully occupy the corresponding niche. Most likely, the update of the arsenals of heavy ICBMs will not lead to a noticeable change in the quantitative indicators, and in the future there will be about the same number of Sarmats on duty as the Governor now costs. However, one should expect a noticeable increase in the qualitative character, provided by an increase in the characteristics and the obtaining of new opportunities.

Thus, by the middle of the next decade, Russia will have a new promising strategic deterrent tool with special capabilities. The threat of a reciprocal use of the Sarmat PC-28 missiles, capable of breaking through any existing missile defense and delivering accurate strikes using any combat equipment, must act soberly on excessively hot representatives of the command of a potential enemy.

On the materials of the sites:
http://mil.ru/
http://kremlin.ru/
https://tvzvezda.ru/
https://tass.ru/
https://ria.ru/
https://bmpd.livejournal.com/
31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    28 February 2019 05: 56
    Imagination draws a kind of matryoshka - "X (x) (A) in 1". And science does not stand still, so you have to constantly make changes, and therefore not quite, it is done soon.
    1. 0
      April 20 2022 19: 40
      TTX where is the full? Range?
  2. -1
    28 February 2019 05: 58
    it should act soberly on the excessively ardent representatives of the command of a potential enemy.

    Ever since the days of the USSR, we have had a well-organized work of such "sobering-up centers" ... lol
    1. -3
      28 February 2019 06: 10
      The article reminds me of the times of the USSR, only instead of the policy of the party, Putin’s words in a message to the people.
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 08: 00
        And more precisely, everything that is happening now reminds me of the USSR 39 ... 40 years. If tomorrow is war - in 3 months we will be in Berlin ...
        1. 0
          28 February 2019 09: 40
          Quote: ohka
          If tomorrow is war - in 3 months we will be in Berlin ...

          With the addition of the 45th from Germany. They are snapping from all sides, but we’ll do a wunderwaffe right now and take revenge on everyone. Just about to do it, any day.
      2. 0
        28 February 2019 14: 55
        Quote: Pessimist22
        The article reminds me of the times of the USSR, only instead of the policy of the party, Putin’s words in a message to the people.


        We will live poorly - but what powerful and effective weapon we have ...
        Similar in content.
        However, the storage periods for the launch vehicle have already been exceeded - it is time to change the minimum "guarantee" fund.
    2. +2
      28 February 2019 06: 43
      Quote: ROSS 42
      "sobering-up centers" ..

      There is no USSR and the "sobering-up centers" burned down, sadly.
  3. +2
    28 February 2019 08: 00
    An excellent and powerful deterrent / response weapon (although I remind theorists that there is also a standard start-on-time command) ...
    the only thing you need to think about ... is there enough of the two remaining divisions of heavy missiles (we are talking about rearmament of the 15A18M missile complex into the existing mines) to fulfill all the tasks ... assigned to this missile complex ... maybe you can think about deploying a third division 8 - 10 regimental personnel ... (launching one regiment ... 6 or more missiles is guaranteed to destroy all significant targets of countries such as France ... or Japan ... for the United States with all overseas territories and bases ... one strike of one division is enough ) ...
  4. +1
    28 February 2019 08: 33
    Of particular interest is the variant of the RS-28 complex with the Avangard hypersonic maneuvering warhead

    Well, here it is still cunning, the RS-28 is of interest with a dozen warheads and an n-number of false targets ... And not just one, let it be maneuvering in airless space. Already let the vanguard put on obsolete carriers that cannot guarantee to hit the enemy with current warheads
    1. -1
      28 February 2019 09: 05
      Why do we need false goals? Once all restrictions have been discarded, then the entire payload on the combat units, we will crush them, reptiles, in the mass, nor any missile defense will be enough.
      1. +1
        28 February 2019 11: 53
        The content of a false target is much cheaper than a warhead, which relatively often needs to be changed to a new one due to the characteristics of neutron fuses, high explosive and plutonium itself.
        Well, security measures are not comparable.
        Look, the Americans have already overstrained themselves on this, now they are crying that everything is old and "probably does not work" laughing
        1. 0
          28 February 2019 12: 04
          Well, here is the dilemma - what do we want - "shob bulo" or whatever is 100%. And maintenance - for 60 years, technical regulations have been worked out both on carriers and on BB, and these false heads (especially heavy ones) are not so primitive, so it is not known which is simpler. Yes
          1. 0
            28 February 2019 12: 11
            Another nuance is one thing when 40 out of 30 goals are 70 simulators (10 percent of them are determined) and another when 750 pcs. At 30 kT and 5 pcs. At 12, which is all real. In the first case, it will work out 16-70 missile defense missiles, and in the second already up to XNUMX, where can I get so much?
      2. +2
        28 February 2019 12: 09
        Why do we need false goals? Since all restrictions have been discarded, then the entire payload on the warheads

        The limit on the number of warheads is still valid, and the carrying capacity of the carrier is limited, so 10 false targets are better than 1-2 real warheads, they will bring down less
        1. +1
          28 February 2019 12: 18
          We are waiting for the end of START-3 (there are no other restrictions)
          Quote: spektr9
          Yes, and the carrying capacity of the carrier is limited,

          The RS-18 had the opportunity to throw up to 36 BB, but it was precisely the limitations on OSV-1 that stopped these ideas and had to put heavy and light imitators, since the cast weight allowed any imagination.
      3. +2
        28 February 2019 14: 52
        Quote: mark1

        Why do we need false goals? Once all restrictions have been discarded, then the entire payload on the combat units, we will crush them, reptiles, in the mass, nor any missile defense will be enough.


        Then, that agreement limits the number of warheads on one carrier within 10 pieces.
        Both the MX and the P-36 can carry more. But only 10 pieces are combat and the rest are means of overcoming missile defense, here we have quasi-heavy false targets that are less retarded in the atmosphere to an altitude of 100-70 km and therefore the time for their selection by missile defense systems is limited.
        1. 0
          28 February 2019 15: 14
          Quote: DimerVladimer
          Then, that agreement limits the number of warheads on one carrier within 10 pieces.

          I do not know how much START-3 limits, but according to SALT-1 the limitation is 14 pieces (as much as it was in the Poseidon S3 BR), the rest I said above.
  5. -1
    28 February 2019 08: 38
    "... with the highest performance ..."
    "... superior performance ..."
    "... give the rocket increased characteristics ..."
    "... the information was confirmed by President Vladimir Putin ..."
    "... should act soberly ..."
    Solid blah blah blah ...
  6. +2
    28 February 2019 14: 42
    This fact in a certain way complicates the work of the enemy’s missile defense systems, which attack the target during dispersal, when it is most noticeable and vulnerable. In addition, this leads to the fact that during dispersal and exit to the trajectory, “Sarmat” remains in a safe zone, inaccessible to the enemy missile defense


    The error is endlessly repeated by technically illiterate journalists.
    There are no missile defense systems capable of intercepting missiles in the active part of the trajectory somewhere in the Yasnoy / Uzhur region (open data) - that is, over the territory of the Russian Federation.
    It is likely that in the event of a retaliatory nuclear strike, high-altitude blocking nuclear explosions will be produced over the base area. To pass the zone of high-altitude blocking nuclear explosions in R-36M2, the discharge of the head fairing was delayed and the BB's protection against factors of a blocking nuclear explosion was increased:
    [
    As a result, the radius of the missile strike zone with a blocking nuclear explosion, compared with the 15А18 rocket, is reduced by 20, the resistance to X-ray radiation is increased by 10 times, gamma-neutron radiation - by 100. The rocket is resistant to the effects of dust formations and large soil particles present in the cloud during a ground-based nuclear explosion.


    But this is not exactly a missile defense system in the generally accepted sense, but rather the tactics of using strategic nuclear weapons to block a retaliatory strike.

    It should be noted that the methods of passive protection of silos and ICBMs have been worked out for a long time.

    Does the author know the criteria for the maximum possible overload for silos in a ground / underground nuclear explosion?

    The accuracy of ignorance of the BB in the 80s did not leave a chance to survive the silos during an attack. They were placed in such a way that it was impossible to hit several mines with a single warhead.
    That is, the passive protection of the silos is not enough for the contents to survive - the missile defense of the facility gives some chances.

    The silos of the Sarmat complex will become an extremely difficult target for the first strike of the enemy, which is highly likely to remain operational and provide a response attack.


    Already funny. Not from a good life, we turned to the development of the Vanguards. American Managed Unit,


    Falcon HTV-2 lagged behind, but this does not mean that it will not be or a similarly designed development, which eliminates the presence of a missile defense facility.

    The threat of the retaliatory use of RS-28 Sarmat missiles, capable of breaking through any existing missile defense and delivering precision strikes using this or that military equipment, should soberly act on overly hot representatives of the potential enemy’s command.


    No - it’s just that the enemy will have an improved MX ICBM with higher characteristics - and so on ad infinitum.

    In general, in this information, it is useful that about 46 units of obsolete R-36M2 complexes with expired storage periods are planned to be changed to more modern ones, with improved media characteristics and equipment.
    Hooray comrades!
  7. 0
    28 February 2019 15: 32
    And recently, General John Haiten, the head of the US Armed Forces Strategic Command, complained to the new Russian missiles in front of the Senate.
    The general told the senators that the American systems were able to detect Russian missiles, but "then they disappear, and we do not see them until the moment of impact." In this regard, the general urged senators to increase spending on the modernization of the US nuclear arsenal.
    1. 0
      1 March 2019 09: 29
      Quote: _Ugene_

      And recently, General John Haiten, the head of the US Armed Forces Strategic Command, complained to the new Russian missiles in front of the Senate.
      The general told the senators that the American systems were able to detect Russian missiles, but "then they disappear, and we do not see them until the moment of impact." In this regard, the general urged senators to increase spending on the modernization of the US nuclear arsenal.


      When they "complain" - we are talking about knocking out a lot of money and filing the military budget.
      The appearance of new missiles does not violate nuclear parity under the treaty.
  8. +1
    28 February 2019 19: 13
    The governor needs to be changed. And even if Ukraine suddenly comes to its senses, and again becomes "brotherly", then there will be no more kin. We must do our own thing, and naturally, at a modern level.
  9. +4
    28 February 2019 21: 24
    Quote: silberwolf88
    may be thinking about deploying a third division of 8-10 regiment ...

    How many billions, if not hundreds of billions of rubles (or even trillions) will need to be spent on this. Not only that, heavy rockets never had a 10-regiment composition, especially the R-36M and modifications. In addition, it is necessary to violate the agreement on not creating new mine PUs, which will hit us as a boomerang ...

    Quote: mark1
    Once all restrictions have been discarded, then the entire payload on the combat units, we will crush them, reptiles, in the mass, nor any missile defense will be enough.

    Discarded? Can you tell when this significant event happened ???

    Quote: mark1
    The RS-18 had the opportunity to throw up to 36 BB

    Do not repeat the nonsense that is circulated by our media. In-1 RS-18 (SS-19, UR-100N UTTH) did not carry more than 6 warheads.
    Secondly, the SR of the R-36M2 Voevoda (RS-20 or SS-18) had only 14 seats for the BG. In addition, the SR was "two-story" and 4 seats were redesigned so that it was impossible to install warheads on them. Only false targets

    Quote: mark1
    I do not know how much START-3 limits, but according to SALT-1 the limitation is 14 pieces (as much as it was in the Poseidon S3 BR), the rest I said above.

    The restrictions go back to the OSV-2 agreement. 10 pieces on ICBMs and 14 on SLBMs. As it was, it remains ...
  10. 0
    1 March 2019 20: 35
    The main feature of the RS-28 "Sarmat" is an increased range that allows you to strike both through the north and through the south pole. The United States will have to build new missile defense facilities on its territory in the direction where they did not exist.
  11. +1
    2 March 2019 00: 57
    What kind of planet in the picture?
    1. +1
      2 March 2019 09: 15
      What kind of planet in the picture?


      1 Painted!
      laughing
      2 Planet Earth after the Third World
      am
      3 Secret planet designed to save a global ry in the event of a nuclear conflict ...
      belay
  12. +1
    2 March 2019 18: 38
    Quote: lopvlad
    The main feature of the RS-28 "Sarmat" is an increased range that allows you to strike both through the north and through the south pole. The United States will have to build new missile defense facilities on its territory in the direction where they did not exist.

    This chip is 100 years old at lunch. Every heavy rocket has such a feature. Back in the 60s, we already had such a rocket - the so-called suborbital rocket 8K69 (R-36 orb. * The only difference is that through the South Pole the rocket delivers to the target three times less payload. And it flies for about an hour, and not 25-30 minutes, as through the North
    They already have a second positional area in California. There are few launchers there now, EMNIP 4 or 6, but increasing the number of launchers is not such a difficult task. And the range of these GBI missiles is up to 5000 km
  13. 0
    3 March 2019 13: 37
    According to recent statements, in flight the Avangard glider can reach speeds of up to M = 27

    This is a rough jamb of the disinformation department, 27 Machs about 9 km / s early, and the first space speed I recall 7,9 km / s.
  14. +1
    3 March 2019 22: 07
    Quote: Passing by
    According to recent statements, in flight the Avangard glider can reach speeds of up to M = 27

    This is a rough jamb of the disinformation department, 27 Machs about 9 km / s early, and the first space speed I recall 7,9 km / s.

    This is not the cant of the misinformation department. This is a jamb of education for those who write this in the media. In principle, it is impossible to talk about the speed M in space. Tabular values ​​of the speed of sound - up to an altitude of 80 km. Moreover, the increase in the speed of sound starts from 30 km (227 m / s) to 80 km (282 m / s). Based on these data, the speed of 27M at an altitude of 80 km is not more than 9 km / s, but 7,6 km / s.
  15. 0
    5 June 2019 17: 08
    how everyone got excited, I wonder what will happen after the first start? bully