BDK "Konstantin Olshansky." Destiny at a crossroads. Part of 1

24
The large landing ship "Konstantin Olshansky" belongs to the project 775 family of landing ships. At the beginning of the second half of the XNUMXth century, the command fleet it became clear that the landing fleet of the Union no longer meets the requirements for it. Therefore, in 1968, on the instructions of the Commander-in-Chief of the USSR Navy Admiral Sergey Georgievich Gorshkov, tactical and technical requirements were developed for the design of a new KFOR (medium landing craft) of project 775. Looking ahead, I will clarify what exactly in the design process because of the increase in displacement paper, the ship was retrained from medium to large landing ship, but formally, until 1977, it remained "medium".

The design itself was carried out in fraternal Poland. The chief designer was the Polish shipbuilder O. Vysotsky, the chief observer from the Soviet Navy was the captain of the 1 rank B.M. Molozhozhnikov (later on, civilian specialist MI Rybnikov replaced him in this position of observer), and L.V. Lugovin.




BDK "Konstantin Olshansky"

The construction of the ships, now practically constituting the core of the amphibious fleet, was also carried out in the Polish shipyard Gdansk at the shipyard Stocznіa Polnocna (translated as “Northern Shipyard”). This shipyard was founded in 1945 year, and since 50-ies engaged in the construction of mainly warships for the fleets of Poland, GDR, USSR, Bulgaria and Yugoslavia. Today, the shipyard was bought by Remontowa SA, and it is called Remontowa Shipbuilding. By the way, the predecessors of Konstantin Olshansky, the ships of the project 770, 771 and 773 were also built on this Polish shipyard.

The first lead ship of the 775 SDK-47 series was built in 1974. As construction progressed, improvements were made in the project, so the first original series, consisting of 12 ships, was completed by 1978 year. According to the NATO classification, these amphibious assault vehicles received the Polish name “Ropucha” (“Toad”).

After the modification of the 775 project, the ships of the 775 II project with the corresponding NATO name Ropucha II, which were built in Gdansk up to the 1992 year, went to the series. This series was different from the ancestor of another radar.



The development of the project in the form of the third series of project 775 was specifically designed for Tanks T-80, but, in fact, they were already slightly different ships, so they passed the project with the number 778. However, the collapse of the Soviet Union put an end to both the project and the entire series. The lead ship of the 778th project, which according to some sources should have been named in honor of Vice Admiral Ivan Ivanovich Gren, even managed to lay down. But at the same rate as “decommunization” was turning into industrial degradation, the already laid ship was cut into metal by 1993.

All built in Gdansk BDK intended only for the Soviet fleet. The exception was only one BDK No. 139, then transferred to the friendly People's Democratic Republic of Yemen in 1979, when our naval forces were based with access to the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Aden in order to protect the newly minted "friends." True, the sense of the "royal" gift was a bit. In 1986, a bloody civil war broke out.

The BDK of the first and second series of the 775 project are multi-deck flat-bottomed amphibious assault ships of the ocean zone. For these ships, a cargo (tank) deck, which runs the entire length, is characteristic, thanks to which the loading and unloading of armored vehicles could be carried out both from the stern and from the bow. Such a design is called the Ro-Ro (or Rocker, in civil shipbuilding it is a cargo-passenger ships, often ferries). The silhouette of a ship with a forecastle and developed aft superstructure is more than recognizable.

BDK "Konstantin Olshansky." Destiny at a crossroads. Part of 1


These ships are intended to transport amphibious forces and disembark them both on the equipped and on the unequipped coast. BDK is also able to provide fire support to the landing party. The ship can be used both to evacuate the population and to deliver humanitarian supplies. By the way, these ships had to carry out the latest actions in practice, but more on that later. As a rule, the BDK operate as part of the ship's amphibious assault group, but it was understood that they are capable of performing their functions independently without the cover ships.

BDK 775 and 775 II are designed for use in one of the following loading options: either 150 man of troops and 10 of main battle tanks of type T-55 with crews of 40 man; or 12 amphibious tanks PT-76 with crews of 36 people; or a unit consisting of three main battle tanks of T-55 type with 12 crews, three 120-mm mortars with crews, three combat vehicles with crews (command and staff vehicles), four ZIL-130 vehicles, four GAZ-66 vehicles and one passenger SUV GAZ-69. On the ship, there is a place to accommodate the landing party to 190 (according to other data, the number can be brought to 225 people, given the hold). The ship is able to transport cargo weighing 650 t to a distance of 4700 miles.

According to the testimony of some of the "visitors" of the ship, the interior is more than modest. Thus, the ceiling height (lining the inside of the ceiling of residential premises) is no more than 2 meters, and in fact, taking into account the space savings between the beds located in three tiers, the paratrooper is always packed, like a cartridge holder. And such transportation can last much longer than one week.

The tank bilge had the following characteristics: length 95 m, width of the bow 6,5 m, width of the stern 4,5 m, height along the diametrical plane 4 m. The landing is carried out with the help of a nasal landing device even with rough seas up to 4 points.

Directly BDK "Konstantin Olshansky" was born under the license number BDK-56. By the way, this ship is a kind of elder brother of two other landing ships operating on the Black Sea - “Caesar Kunikov” and “Novocherkassk”.

The main performance characteristics of the Konstantin Olshansky BDK:

The standard displacement is 2768 tons, the total displacement is 4012 tons.
112,5 meter length, 15,01 meter width, 4,26 meter draft.
Full speed - 18 knots (power plant - 2 diesel engine "Zgoda-Sulzer" 16ZVB40 / 48 for 9600 hp. Each).
3500 miles sailing range for 16 nodes or 6000 miles for 12 nodes;
Autonomy about 30 days.
The total number of crew - 98 people.

And now about the armament of the BDK. As an artillery weapon, the Konstantin Olshansky carries two twinned 57-mm AK-725 installations. One is set before the wheelhouse, the second at the stern. Artstanovki, as they say, with history. They were developed as early as 60's, and were put into service as early as 1964. Production of plants was stopped in the 1988 year, so the last three ships of the 775 project were armed with more modern AK-176 and two 30-mm six-barrel AK-630М installations.


And in the clean ... sea system "Grad"

For the fire support of the assault force, the ship was equipped with two Grad-M A-215 multiple launch rocket systems of 122 mm caliber. The 40-barrel system А-215 is capable of throwing unpleasant surprises in the form of high-explosive fragmentation missiles 9М22У at a distance of up to 20-thousand meters.

Also, to enhance the security of the BDK, Strela-3 MANPADS were included in the mandatory kit, in addition to stationary weapons.

That is how the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet of the USSR entered into service in the BND-56 of the USSR in 1985. In 1991, the year of the license ship got its present name - "Konstantin Olshansky". Konstantin Fedorovich himself, after whom the ship was named, was born in 1915 in the Kharkov province and was an ordinary car mechanic before the war. After being drafted, he joined the Red Army on the Black Sea Fleet. Olshansky participated in the defense of Sevastopol and Yeisk, liberated Taganrog and Mariupol.

In 1944, commanding a tiny detachment of paratroopers in 68, Olshansky seized the port of Nikolaev and, defending the object for two days, pulled the considerable Nazi forces to him and this greatly facilitated the task of the advancing Soviet troops. During the operation, a detachment of Konstantin Fyodorovich destroyed the Nazis to 700. Apart from the fact that the sappers of the detachment retained most of the infrastructure of the port, which the Nazis intended to blow up.


Landing with the same type BDK

Olshansky died in that battle. He was posthumously awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union. Konstantin Fedorovich was buried in a mass grave in Nikolaev in the 68 park of paratroopers. There, as I know, the hands of the Kiev junta have not yet reached.

However, in the same year 1991 allegedly entered into force the so-called Act of the Proclamation of Independence of Ukraine. This marked a massive razderbanivanie Soviet national property, in this case the Black Sea Fleet, from the infrastructure to the ships directly. The thought itself was not even capable of penetrating into the greedy skull boxes, why a ship was needed, what tasks it would solve, etc. By the way, it was then that the purely doctrinaire "basis" of the Ukrainian fleet was laid, which brought it to its present state. Mriya about "spaceships plowing the Bolshoi Theater," replaced the harsh reality.

The new authorities of Ukraine laid claim to all the ships of the fleet, as in the well-known joke “a tse on the land”. Therefore, provocations and open attempts at forceful seizure have become commonplace for the Konstantin Olshansky BDK.

To be continued ...
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    4 February 2019 06: 22
    I wonder what is guided by in NATO or with us when they give a code name? Indeed, the BDK is a little like a toad. There must be some logic
    1. 0
      4 February 2019 07: 12
      Well, yes, of course the Russian "flower garden": Acacia, Cornflower, and so on. Looks like frivolous. Whether it’s the Hammer, the way it’s zhahnet, so zhahnet!
      In general, the topic is interesting, it has already been touched upon in VO; in this, the Russians are definitely not equal!
    2. 0
      4 February 2019 09: 43
      Nemchura called I-16 * Rata * - a rat, such as with contempt, forgetting that the rat is a tenacious, strong, cunning beast, with sharp teeth! even though they call our weapons, they won’t get any worse!
      1. 0
        4 February 2019 17: 04
        nemchura called I-16 * Rata * - rat
        * Rata * this is from being as nimble as a rat. "Do not drive the rat into a corner ..." a very unpredictable beast.
        1. +1
          5 February 2019 06: 05
          I will tell you a terrible secret - for me the I-16 is my favorite airplane of those that flew, fly and will still fly!
        2. 0
          5 February 2019 21: 35
          And the Spaniards called it "chatos" - "snub-nosed"
    3. 0
      5 February 2019 18: 43
      Quote: vladcub

      I wonder what is guided by in NATO or with us when they give a code name?

      in NATO, words are selected according to the following criteria:

      It must be sonorous and memorable, not to present difficulties during transmission by technical means of communication. It should be difficult to confuse with another word. That is why the words rarely used in everyday speech are often chosen.

      Toad by them: toad.
      Ropucha-class landing ship was named Ropucha, since it was built in Poland (in Polish, Ropucha-toad)
      Bufonidae (Toad) - a family of tailless amphibians
      Amphibians, or amphibians, can here and there breathe with gills and skin / lungs.

      Everything is logical
  2. +5
    4 February 2019 09: 48
    The author is somewhat inaccurate in the description of the series of the project 775. There were three series different in appearance. The first differed mainly in the mast. The second series carried the MLRS grad. The third series received the AK-176. AK-630 and radar "Positive" also PK-16. The third series was built 3 units. Personally served on BDK-47, 105. and 58.
    1. +3
      4 February 2019 12: 58
      The second series carried MLRS grad.

      The second series is also not all with the Grad, on the TOF BDK-98 (Nevelskoy) and BDK-101 (Oslyabya) they are not there either.
      By the way, Lao T-34s were brought from Vietnam "Oslyabya" and "Vilkov". The first was loaded with 12 pieces, the second - 18.
  3. +4
    4 February 2019 11: 22
    “The interior is more than modest. So, the height of the ceiling (covering the inner side of the ceiling of residential premises) is no more than 2 meters, and in fact, taking into account the space savings between the beds located in three tiers, the paratrooper is always packed, like a cartridge in a clip. And such transportation can last much longer than one week. ”
    I had to live in the aft cockpit of the landing of the BDK "Voronezh Komsomolets" pr.1171 and more than a month
    and people there went to the battlefield to Angola ... So after a cubicle of 300 places, the living conditions on BDK pr. 775 are quite normal, given the dimensions and displacement. This is not UDC "Tarava" ...
    1. +3
      4 February 2019 22: 26
      Quote: Fotoceva62
      I had to live in the aft cockpit of the landing of the BDK "Voronezh Komsomolets"

      and I was on the "Crimean Komsomolets" in the 82nd year. then there was "Filchenkov", but not for long. The conditions were Spartan for the crew and for the Marines.
      1. +1
        5 February 2019 15: 29
        In 1982, I already served on the EM "Perfect", and then 29 calendars on different hardware.
        1. +2
          5 February 2019 18: 08
          Quote: Fotoceva62
          on EM "Perfect"

          if not mistaken, then in Novoozernoye stood? At least the destroyers of this series were nearby
          1. +1
            6 February 2019 11: 07
            The division stood between the BDK and the conservation. Divisional Commander Kap.2 Kisses nickname "brick".
            1. +2
              6 February 2019 11: 09
              Quote: Fotoceva62
              The division stood between the BDK and the conservation.

              absolutely right. Nearby still an old floating workshop stood. My commander cap. 2 Grams, the first drop Kurenkov
  4. -3
    4 February 2019 15: 02
    I’m looking at these ships ... To whom did the Mistrals interfere? Apparently admirals and senior officers, when they saw the human conditions of living l / s. Such a mess should not be allowed. Too bad example. Decomposing everything and everyone.
    1. +2
      4 February 2019 16: 57
      Mistral and Project 775
      ships completely different in terms of use. Project 775 is an assault ship, with good strike capabilities: if there is no landing, it can work with a minzag or cannon boat.
      Something like this.
      1. 0
        6 February 2019 13: 38
        And for me, the heels of the Ka-52 from the Mistral have an incomparably greater impact force than the cannons of the BDK + Grady on it.
        And the above photo is the best illustration of the fact that the BDK is just a big target. You need to manage to miss.
        1. 0
          6 February 2019 13: 45
          BDK is a good transport for transporting marines and their equipment. When you just need to bring and just drop off.
  5. -4
    4 February 2019 18: 18
    Can't an article appear in the Armaments section without such a set of "theses"?
    with a tiny detachment of paratroopers of 68 people, Olshansky captured the port of Nikolaev ... exterminated up to 700 Nazis.

    and wasn't June 12, 1990 before? naturally "supposedly so-called"
    However, in the same 1991, the so-called Act of Declaration of Independence of Ukraine entered supposedly into legal force. In greedy skull boxes
    1. -1
      4 February 2019 22: 43
      Quote: Dimka75
      and wasn't June 12, 1990 before? naturally "supposedly so-called"
      However, in the same 1991, the so-called Act of Declaration of Independence of Ukraine entered supposedly into legal force. In greedy skull boxes

      I also noticed that the author managed to spoil a good article. "The junta didn't get it" and "supposedly".
      Forgetting that the Russian Federation is the first. But then they are braces, and this is "Bandera" (ours and others)
      recently looked there broke off 2 trees (for sure! the junta! did) and also "The junta held tenders there
      The department of housing and communal services of the Nikolaev city council following the results of the repeated tender intends to conclude an agreement with the Nikolayevzelenkhoz company on care of 4 squares in the center of Nikolaev for a total amount of almost 3,5 million hryvnias.
      This is evidenced by the data of the electronic procurement system Prozorro.
      We are talking about caring for the square named after 68 paratroopers with a memorial monument, a square near the Nikolaev Regional State Administration, Pushkin Square and Arkasovsky Square. According to the tender tasks, by the end of this year, the contractor who won the tender will have to clean the lawns and flower beds, mechanically clean the sidewalks from dirt and snow, clean the lawns from fallen leaves, clean the bins from the trash, take care of the trees, take care of the soil, planting plants, lawn mowing and garbage collection.

      you’re what Herods thought of ... laughing
      and got there!
      "Konstantin Olshansky" was captured by the Russian military on March 24, 2014.
      During the Crimean conflict, on the night of March 6, 2014, it was blocked along with another 6 warships of the Ukrainian Navy in Donuzlav Bay, as a result of flooding by the sailors of the Russian Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Navy several decommissioned ships, including the large anti-submarine ship Ochakov. The sailors managed to disable the machine and equipment.
      Status - interned by Russia
      For 2019 is under the control of the Russian Federation. Russia has not denied and does not deny the Ukrainian affiliation of “Konstantin Olshansky” and is ready to transfer the ship to Ukraine after the cessation of hostilities in the Donbass
      1. 0
        April 23 2019 10: 13
        Quote: Antares
        and is ready to transfer the ship to Ukraine after the cessation of hostilities in the Donbass

        ===
        where, taking into account the new priorities, it can be renamed, for example, in "hero of the UPA"
  6. 0
    5 February 2019 18: 19
    Quote: Author
    There, as I know, hands Kiev junta until we got there.

    I beg you ... Don't call them "Junta".

    Junta (Spanish junta - assembly) —A military reactionary terrorist group that seized power and established a terrorist dictatorship ...

    A lot of honor
    Colonel-junta regime
    Junta de Gobierno de Chile (Pinochet) junta
    Turchinov or something military?
  7. 0
    5 February 2019 20: 38
    very interesting topic, we look forward to continuing