The fifth generation of submarines. Requirements and projects

33
The most modern nuclear and diesel-electric submarines replenishing the composition of the naval fleet, refer to the conditional fourth generation. At the same time, shipbuilding designers do not lose time and work on issues related to the further development of the submarine fleet and the creation of the next fifth generation ships. According to reports, to date, the Russian design bureaus have already managed to complete some of the necessary work and to a certain extent bring closer the moment of the appearance of fifth-generation submarines.

Generation theory



The modern submarine separation system covers projects created after the end of World War II. It was during this period in the field of submarine construction that a number of fundamentally new technologies began to be introduced, which had a positive effect on the characteristics and capabilities of the finished equipment. Subsequently, the submarines received new instruments and devices, other weapons, etc. All this led to a qualitative growth and, as a result, to the formation of the next generation.

However, it should be noted that the division of submarines into generations is conditional. There are no generally accepted and well-defined criteria, and different definitions may be used in different countries. Despite such problems, the classification with the division into generations to some extent simplifies the analysis of the development of submarine fleets. In addition, the concept of generations can be used to showcase technological advances or for advertising purposes.



Now in our country new nuclear submarines of projects 885 “Ash” and 955 “Borey”, as well as diesel-electric projects 636 “Varshavyanka” and 677 “Lada” are being built. These projects are usually referred to the fourth post-war generation. It is believed that this generation differs from the previous one by raising all the main technical and operational characteristics. It received more advanced digital radio-electronic systems and improved weapons. Finally, various technologies were used, which allowed for record-breaking low noise figures.

To date, domestic shipbuilders, in general, have formed the basic requirements for the submarines of the next fifth generation. It is planned to continue to reduce physical fields and visibility for detection tools, to increase the degree of automation of onboard systems and to introduce modern components into all major systems. Nuclear power plants are expected to be upgraded, including with the introduction of systems that do not need to be recharged throughout their service. Diesel-electric systems should be improved and production of air-independent power plants should be reached.

Known and proven components and ideas, as well as options for their development will be the basis of new projects. Together with them when creating submarines it is proposed to use a number of completely new ideas and solutions that have not yet been applied in real projects. It is these new products will have to improve all the basic characteristics and capabilities of the ships.

In recent years, the possibility (and in some cases the necessity) of using the modular architecture of a submarine has been repeatedly mentioned. The base for the underwater ship is proposed to make a universal platform with a number of general ship systems capable of carrying certain modules for solving different tasks. Thus, on the basis of a unified base it will be possible to build boats for various purposes. Due to this approach, it is planned to reduce the cost and simplify both construction and subsequent operation. Also, to some extent, the development of new modifications and the modernization of existing ships will be simplified.

The submarine needs an advanced means of detection, which allows it to notice the enemy in time and, if necessary, to carry out the attack first. In the context of the fifth generation, further development of the existing sonar, radar and optical systems is expected - the usual ones for modern submarines. At the same time, it is proposed to equip new ships with additional robotic complexes. On board the submarine must be unmanned submersibles capable of conducting reconnaissance at some distance from the carrier. The use of such intelligence officers will increase the situational awareness of the submarine, but at the same time will reduce the likelihood of its early detection.

The military, scientists and engineers have repeatedly mentioned the need for the full inclusion of the submarine in the general information and control structures of the armed forces. However, in this area there is a characteristic problem: when transmitting or receiving data, the stealth of the boat is sharply reduced, and it is exposed to risks. Whether the task will be solved and how it will be done is not specified. Perhaps some solutions have been found that allow submarines to exchange data, but not risk stealth and security.

In the field of armaments, the fifth generation will be a logical continuation of the previous ones. It is proposed to build strategic missile submarine cruisers with ballistic missiles, as well as multi-purpose boats with cruise missiles. In this case, we should expect an increase in the characteristics of weapons and the introduction of fundamentally new models. Already obtained results in the development of missile weapons will allow to abandon the concept of a purely torpedo submarine. Even with only torpedo tubes, the ship can use both torpedoes and rockets.

Thus, the new fifth generation of submarines is quite capable of being a breakthrough. Transitions between previous generations were carried out not too sharply - with the gradual introduction of new solutions and technologies. The submarines of the expected fifth generation can have a lot of differences from modern models, including at the level of concepts. However, it is not necessary to overestimate the future submarines. It is quite possible another scenario, in which the differences of the fourth and fifth generation will not be drastic.

Husky generation

Several years ago, the command of the Russian Navy and representatives of the shipbuilding industry disclosed part of their plans for the further development of the submarine fleet. It became known that promising fifth-generation boats will be built only after the 2030 year. At the same time it was planned to develop new projects of all main classes. In the fifth generation both nuclear and diesel-electric or non-nuclear submarines were to remain.

From subsequent reports, it became clear that the thirties would be the period of the arrival of new submarines in service, and the development of promising projects should start in the near future. According to various estimates, the first projects of this kind should be created by the mid-twenties. The second half of the decade will be spent on the construction and testing of promising ships. Accordingly, by the year 2030 it will be possible to determine the date of delivery of the first submarines of the new types.

To date, it has become known that the Malachite St. Petersburg Marine Engineering Bureau has begun to work on the appearance of a promising fifth-generation nuclear submarine. While the project is working title "Husky". An advance design of such a boat was carried out at the end of 2017 of the year and at the same time presented to the command of the Navy. In May, the management of the United Shipbuilding Corporation 2018 announced the completion of the design. At that time, the development of tactical and technical characteristics of the future ship was carried out.

Apparently, further work on the Husky theme will take several more years. It was announced a long time ago that the lead ship of this project would be laid in 2023-24, and this information has not been updated since. This suggests that the new project is not yet ready to launch construction, but in a few years the situation will change. By the mid-twenties, construction starts, and at the beginning of the next decade, the fleet will be able to put the submarine into service.

It should be noted that the Husky project envisages the construction of nuclear-powered submarines only. It was mentioned earlier that non-nuclear submarines will be present in the Russian fifth generation, but no new information has been received to this effect. The further development of non-nuclear submarines faced known problems, and the future of this direction remains uncertain.

New ideas for new projects

As it became known to date, almost all original ideas proposed for the fifth generation will be used in the promising project of the Husky submarine. For example, it is proposed to use a modular architecture that provides the use of different weapons on a common platform. Due to this, it will be possible to develop at once two boats with different combat missions.

It was mentioned that the Husky submarines would be smaller than the existing Ash trees; full displacement will reach 12 thousand tons. A two-part scheme with a modular approach to the equipment of the cases will be used. In the design it is planned to use modern composite materials and perspective devices. A new type of hull should provide a significant reduction of physical fields and, accordingly, visibility for the means of detecting the enemy. Due to new materials, technologies and components, the life of submarines can be extended to 50 years.

On the basis of a common platform, it is proposed to build two versions of submarines with different weapons and differing combat missions. The first type of ship will be designed to search and destroy enemy submarines, primarily armed with ballistic missiles. Such a boat will carry torpedoes and anti-submarine missiles. Perhaps all the weapons will be used with standard torpedo tubes, as on some modern submarines.

The second version of the “Husky” ALP will carry missile weapons designed to destroy surface and coastal targets. It has been repeatedly mentioned earlier that such ships will be armed with promising hypersonic anti-ship zircon missiles. The use of Calibr and Onyx products is also not excluded. The available data on the armaments and the tasks of such boats suggest that they will also differ from “anti-submarine” submarines in the composition of radio-electronic and sonar equipment.

In the medium term, it is planned to build two variants of nuclear submarines of the Husky family at once. However, it has not yet been clarified to which version of the project the head ship, planned for the bookmark in 2023-24, will belong to. Also, the topic of further construction of the lead ship of the second modification remains undisclosed. It can be assumed that this submarine will be built in the second half of the twenties and will enter service in the early thirties, a little later than the first.

The construction of two modifications of the Husky series submarines is a matter of the distant future. For obvious reasons, plans for the series can only be formed in the next decade. For their preparation it is necessary to complete the development of the project and determine the requirements of financial, industrial and other nature. Therefore, in the coming years, the Ministry of Defense will hardly be able to give the dates and volumes of building a full-fledged series of promising submarines of the fifth generation.

Future affairs

Currently, the Russian shipbuilding industry is implementing several large orders for the construction of modern nuclear and diesel-electric submarines of a number of projects. These submarines, capable of carrying cruise and ballistic missiles, as well as torpedoes and mines, belong to the fourth post-war generation. In the fourth generation were obtained high tactical and technical characteristics and the required capabilities.

The development of the submarine fleet must continue, and work is already underway to create a completely new generation of submarines. The basic requirements for such ships are defined and design is underway. Over the next few years, this stage of work will be completed, after which the construction of the first submarine of a fundamentally new type starts. All this allows us to look into the future with cautious optimism. The submarine forces of the Russian Navy are being updated. In the future, these processes will not stop and will lead to new remarkable results.

On the materials of the sites:
https://tass.ru/
https://tvzvezda.ru/
https://ria.ru/
https://rg.ru/
http://arms-expo.ru/
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/
https://globalsecurity.org/
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +7
    21 January 2019 08: 05
    I don’t understand how anything can be developed without a military concept, at least until the year of the proposed introduction of these boats?
    Or do we do it first, and then look - did it fit / not fit the reality?
    1. +2
      22 January 2019 04: 12
      Does anyone know what it means
      Modern submarine division system
      ??
  3. 0
    21 January 2019 08: 40
    A very necessary line of work, improving the most important component of the Navy! Modern submarines need a lot
  4. +8
    21 January 2019 08: 59
    If the Husky is going to pawn only after 2030, then this is just horrible. Although predictable.
    1. +2
      21 January 2019 10: 00
      Construction will begin by the mid-twenties, and at the beginning of the next decade, the fleet will be able to put the submarine into operation


      The article seems to say that by this time they will already be built, although, of course, the style of Kirill Ryabov does not allow us to draw unambiguous conclusions :))
  5. -4
    21 January 2019 09: 28
    SSBNs and strike submarines - FSE, the first generation of unmanned mini-submarines and their carriers has arrived.
    1. -1
      27 March 2019 19: 43
      Quote: Operator
      SSBNs and strike submarines - FSE, the first generation of unmanned mini-submarines and their carriers has arrived.

      We’ll wait another 40 years ...
      No one will give any AI any right to independently decide on the launch of nuclear weapons ...
  6. +4
    21 January 2019 11: 09
    Colleagues, as far as I understand, all over the world military "naval builders" have already played with the idea of ​​modular ships and rejected it as useless. With a submarine it will be technically even more difficult ... Or not?
    1. +9
      21 January 2019 12: 03
      This is not about modularity, but about unification.
      On the basis of a single hull and basic units and assemblies, boats of different specializations will be built.
      1. +4
        21 January 2019 12: 04
        Then of course - and justified, and necessary!
  7. +3
    21 January 2019 13: 25
    It is time to make launches of ballistic missiles from submarines horizontal, from torpedo tubes, "cold start".
    Then boats of such huge diameters (and general dimensions) will not be needed - under vertically standing BRs.
    1. +5
      21 January 2019 19: 20
      Quote: voyaka uh
      It is time to make launches of ballistic missiles from submarines horizontal, from torpedo tubes, "cold start".

      Then, you have to first invent the BR, under the TA sub.
      Dimensions of the "Bulava" - 12m x 2m, weight - 37 tons
      Submarine dimensions of project 955 Borey
      Case length - 170 m
      Case Width - 13,5 m
      Then boats of such huge diameters (and general dimensions) will not be needed - under vertically standing BRs.

      ... Then you have to lengthen the case, under horizontally lying (full-length submarine fellow , which is impossible even in theory. Otherwise, the boat will stand upright or just break in half ... Think for yourself how to place the BC in the 16 Bulava BR?

      ... If you really do, then obliquely like a PU on the Antaeus.
      (!) All boats are designed most optimally and repeatedly. With the most correct ergonomics. And at the moment, nothing can be improved.
      1. +1
        21 January 2019 19: 46
        Nothing can be improved before someone can do it :))))
        drinks
        1. +4
          21 January 2019 20: 02
          Nothing can be improved before someone can do it :))))

          ... yeah laughing
          1. 0
            21 January 2019 20: 39
            Imagine a submarine with 8 torpedoes of large diameter. Four from each side.
            In two rows in height. Fired from 4 launchers. Two for each launcher.
            Submitted? - Now replace the torpedoes on the missiles in the tubes. smile
            The submarine will be twice thinner at the same length. And five times cheaper.
            I’m afraid it’s a bet that they will do something like that soon.
            If they switch to the "mosquito" surface fleet, then the next in line is the mosquito submarine.
            1. +3
              21 January 2019 21: 23
              ... I wonder what's the use? Reducing the size even by 30 - 50% (!), In 3D scales of the World Ocean, will not change anything ... Except, it will add a "headache" to those involved in the creation and operation of SSBNs.
              ... "The smaller the ship, the stronger the pitching" (!)

              1. -3
                21 January 2019 23: 26
                "... I wonder what's the use of that?" ////
                ----
                I wrote - financial. Giant submarines are ruinous for not
                a very rich country as in the construction process,
                and during operation. Shark project is grandiose with design
                point of view is an example.
                Why is Russia building not destroyers, but RTOs? For the same reason I foresee
                transition to "small missile submarines".
                1. +4
                  22 January 2019 00: 19
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  I foresee the transition to "small submarine missile carriers".
                  Sure, not a problem! Only start their own SLBMs they will have from the Gulf of Mexico. From the zone of effective US Navy PLO. Maybe 1-2 SLBMs and release ... (On the basis of the energy of an SLBM, there will be a range, and at the same time, ZV)
                  So, stop the ridiculous naval ... missile ... mechanical engineers and other servicemen in the fleet. AHA.
                2. 0
                  4 March 2019 10: 34
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  "... I wonder what's the use of that?" ////
                  ----
                  I wrote - financial. Giant submarines are ruinous for not
                  a very rich country as in the construction process,
                  and during operation. Shark project is grandiose with design
                  point of view is an example.
                  Why is Russia building not destroyers, but RTOs? For the same reason I foresee
                  transition to "small missile submarines".

                  Because there is no serial gas turbine engine for destroyers, but I don’t want to do it on coal with boilers.
            2. +6
              22 January 2019 00: 13
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Imagine a submarine with 8 torpedoes of large diameter. Four from each side.
              In two rows in height. Shot from 4 launchers. Two for each launcher.
              Submitted? - Now replace the torpedoes on the missiles in the tubes.

              Oh God!
              1. Count the moment to differentiate! Shoulder - 80м, weight: (38х4) = 152т ... No automatic stabilization will keep the boat, She will dive, and God forbid, you will be able to divert him from the sunset angle by the rudders and the nose bubble ...
              2. An example of the PLRC "Waterfall" haunts you? But its range is not intercontinental. If you manage to make an SLBM in the weight and overall characteristics of the "Waterfall" with an intercontinental range and 6-10 BB, at least an average (150 Kt) power, then you can embody your idea in iron. But for now - alas.
              Sincerely. Boa.
              1. -3
                22 January 2019 00: 52
                "with an intercontinental range and 6-10 BB, at least an average (150Kt) power" ///
                ----
                For nuclear deterrence, such capacities (and missile sizes) are redundant.
                In order to scare the enemy very much and keep him in suspense
                it is enough to have 8 ICBMs with one warhead of 150 Kt each.
                And it will turn out a rocket of a relatively small diameter.
                And, of course, launching from torpedo tubes not all together, but in turn, so that
                keep the submarine in place.
            3. +4
              22 January 2019 01: 16
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Imagine a submarine with 8 torpedoes of large diameter. Four from each side.
              In two rows in height. Fired from 4 launchers. Two for each launcher.
              Submitted? - Now replace the torpedoes on the missiles in the tubes. smile
              The submarine will be twice thinner at the same length. And five times cheaper.
              I’m afraid it’s a bet that they will do something like that soon.
              If they switch to the "mosquito" surface fleet, then the next in line is the mosquito submarine.


              comrade, "be afraid" of making a pawn with your wife, forgive me, at least you won't make anyone laugh.
  8. +7
    21 January 2019 14: 08
    Some kind of wandering in the empyrean. What, in fact, is the article about? The fifth generation of submarines? If you look at the materials on this topic, the whole world believes in Russia and that the project of the fifth generation Husky submarines will be implemented. Since everyone else's head is busy with the implementation of specific projects, and it seems that no one bothers too much for generations.
    The United States, it seems, does not suffer from any troubles over generations and implements its Columbia-class submarine program, which they plan to operate until 2085, that is, in the next 65 years. Apparently, the Columbia-class is not the fifth, but the nth generation, since they are going to operate it before the end of the XNUMXst century. The only problematic issue is the price.
    Even a distant country like Australia, where wild kangaroos still live, has the SEA 1000 Future Submarine Program, a submarine construction program until 2050.
    Taiwanese and Hindus also have specific programs for the next thirty years. In a word, with generations for the next thirty years, at least, everyone has decided and is building.
    Maybe you don’t need to publish materials about anything, thoughts of young men far from the subject? Or the same reflections of those who, due to their age, retired from the question of the elders, such as today's article on Ukrainian tanks. Maybe you should try looking for authors who will write something on the case?
    1. +2
      21 January 2019 19: 39
      And in the case, everything is closed with secrecy. By the way, the author is quite himself and says that the division into generations is very, very conditional. The boats of the same project will differ greatly from each other, depending on the purpose. So "speculative" is very appropriate here.
  9. -4
    21 January 2019 14: 36
    Absolutely any submarines, existing now and adopted by the USA and NATO countries or new ones that are just being developed at the moment, will be inferior in future to all tactical and technical characteristics of Russian submarines that have not yet been created and have no analogues. And this is a matter of the near future.
  10. -2
    21 January 2019 20: 01
    The military themselves are not confused with their 4, 4+, 4 ++, 5 generations? belay - who and how installs them? - have never read about the history of weapons, so that someone proudly wrote - "we built a submarine of the 2nd generation" laughing
  11. +5
    21 January 2019 20: 09
    Not an article but a slag! The perfect example of graphomania! (or earning a rating on the Military Review on "water").

    You can also squeeze the article "The sixth generation of aircraft. Requirements and projects" - The latest developments will be used! Hooray!

    "New generation of tanks. Requirements and designs" - The latest developments will be used! Hooray!

    "The next generation of artillery. Requirements and designs" - The latest developments will be used! Hooray!

    "and introduce modern components into all major systems"

    Deep! Strong! Analytically! And most importantly, informative :))))
    And you can do this: all indicators will be significantly improved!
    And most of the shortcomings are eliminated!
    And "Development (insert what you want) must continue, and work is already underway to create a completely new generation (insert what you want). Basic requirements for such (insert what you want) are defined and design is underway."
  12. +1
    21 January 2019 20: 23
    Russia is a country of contrasts. We are thinking about the 5th generation of submarines, but somewhere along the way, getting up from calendars, we lost the 10th egg. Russia is a country of contrasts. But of course, good luck to the submariners.
  13. -1
    21 January 2019 22: 10
    The author did not understand one thing! The 5th generation is already 5 years old both in the seas and in series! Non-nuclear boats outside those that made the Germans this are generally super! Americans asked for exercises with their atomic. Then they scratched their turnips for a long time and made changes to their last atomarins! Do we actually finish 4th generation atomarines and? And then the emptiness of neither technology nor the idea of ​​what and how to do. All! By 2030, the submarine will be so purely a nominal defender of the homeland. I’m not for people; they are flint; I am for technology!
  14. +3
    22 January 2019 19: 55
    ...... when transmitting or receiving data, the stealth of the boat is sharply reduced, and it is at risk ........
    "I'll tell you one funny thing, just don't laugh" (c)
    Transmit with information, session time for submarine departure, flooding. It was used back in the 60s.
    Reception antenna. It was used back in the 50s.
    Repeater-was used back in the 40s.
    Unfortunately, SBD and satellite have been "taken" since the 80s. Since the 80s, they have had a bottom lighthouse system, mapping the sea surface. Our boats sometimes fell into their areas of operation (the term "Quakers" appeared, when the system was removed in 1993, talk about them ceased). In 1993, we worked with the USA on the ACOUS topic. But I think they just wanted to know the possibilities of our science in this direction. A year later, the joint work ended. (((
    And the issue of target designation for "Calibers" and other things has not been resolved. And all that we had exclusive to them for a long time in civilian spheres - navigation, data exchange, control of pipelines, etc.

    1. +2
      22 January 2019 21: 45
      Quote: Alex-333
      And the issue of target designation for "Calibers" and other things has not been resolved.

      Irtysh-Amphora hears on 220-230 km, which is quite enough in tactical terms. And 955 is specifying its place, using the SJC to bind coordinates to the submarine launch area of ​​the SLBM. This ensures the secrecy of receiving his place. And the place of the goal is laid in the head of the Bulava.
      1. -1
        22 January 2019 22: 45
        Yes, I’m only for))) Hears what? How many boards in the AMG? It was already-shooting in a bunch .. Read, I have enough about it. Do not repeat the same for the tenth time.
        Semenov-anti-submarine warfare. A look from the USSR
        http://samlib.ru/editors/s/semenow_aleksandr_sergeewich333/protivolodochnaioborona-nov2018.shtml
        Aircraft Carrier - Answers to Questions
        http://samlib.ru/editors/s/semenow_aleksandr_sergeewich333/avianosec-1985-86.shtml

  15. 0
    4 March 2019 09: 32
    ... but in general, officials exist, or not .. Such a blizzard, the light is not visible ..