T-34 tanks in the XXI century

72
A few days ago, the Russian Ministry of Defense published an extremely interesting news. From Laos to our country arrived 30 medium tanks T-34-85, withdrawn from service of this Asian state. This means that another country nevertheless abandoned the armored combat vehicles created back in the early forties. Nevertheless, the rearmament of the Lao army has little effect on the general situation in the world: T-34 tanks and various equipment based on them continue to serve in a number of small and poor countries in Asia and Africa.

Way abroad



Serial production of medium tanks T-34 started in 1940 year and continued over the next few years. The latest serial modification of this technology was the T-34-85. These machines were produced in our country before the 1946 year, after which the industry launched the assembly of newer and more advanced designs. In total, the USSR built more than 60 thousand tanks T-34 of all modifications. Much of this technology was lost during the Great Patriotic War, but numerous surviving tanks continued service.


T-34-85 tanks from Laos after arriving in Russia. Photo of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation


As part of military-technical cooperation, the Soviet Union handed over its armored vehicles to friendly countries. In the case of the T-34 family of tanks, it was about the transfer of finished equipment, decommissioned in combat units. Soviet armored troops received modern equipment, and old samples were written off and sent to third countries, or left for storage. This practice lasted almost until the sixties. During this time, the T-34 tanks managed to go to more than three dozen countries around the world.

It is noteworthy that some foreign countries received not only ready-made armored vehicles, but also a license to manufacture them. At the beginning of the 1950s, the Czechoslovak Republic and the Polish People's Republic established their own production of T-34-85 tanks in an improved post-war configuration. According to various sources, in the 1952-58 years, these two countries built for their own needs at least 4,5-4,6 thousand T-34 tanks. As production proceeded, foreign tank builders refined the original design and improved production technology.


T-34 Polish production. Photo of Wikimedia Commons


In the future, Poland and Czechoslovakia were able to modernize their armored forces, and the “used” T-34 went to storage or for export. Despite its age, the tanks of the Soviet design and foreign production were of interest to customers. So, according to available data, T-34 tanks, recently transferred to Russia, were built in Czechoslovakia and acquired by Laos relatively recently - in the eighties. Confirmation of these data may be some of the design features characteristic of Czechoslovak-made tanks.

Thus, in the post-war period, the mid-range T-34 medium tanks of the last serial modification were able to enter service with nearly four dozen countries and had the most noticeable influence on the development of their armored forces. The T-34-85 service in most foreign armies continued for several decades and was completed by the early nineties. Outdated morally and physically technology was written off and sent to museums or for processing. However, in a number of countries, T-34 remain in service and still contribute to defense capability.


Czechoslovak T-34-85. Photo of Wikimedia Commons


In the ranks and in reserve

According to open sources, until recently, T-34-85 tanks remained in service with 10 foreign countries. At the same time, the number of foreign operators of such equipment is constantly decreasing. From time to time there are new data on the state of certain armies in which the rejection of old models is mentioned. In addition, the list of T-34 owners has declined since the recent Russian-Lao agreement. However, in such circumstances, medium tanks since World War II continue to serve.

At one time, as a matter of military assistance, the Soviet Union transferred significant quantities of material to a number of friendly Asian states. Thus, during the Korean War, T-34 tanks were used by Chinese and North Korean units. China has long abandoned obsolete machines, while in the DPRK, the army retains a certain number of T-34. Unfortunately, there is no detailed information about this. The number and status of North Korean T-34-85 are unknown. At the same time, there is every reason to believe that Pyongyang has the opportunity not to use this technique as the basis of armored forces.

T-34 tanks in the XXI century
Chinese tank crews and their T-34 in Korea, 1952. Photo by Wikimedia Commons


Later, our country and the Allies transferred significant quantities of T-34 tanks and other samples of different classes to North Vietnam. Most of this technology was lost in the battles, but some machines managed to avoid a sad fate. According to the directory The Military Balance for 2018 year, the Vietnamese army has such tanks for 45. However, they are all in storage and have almost no chance of returning to service.

One of the recipients of the Soviet equipment written off was Cuba. She was supplied with decommissioned tanks of old models, as well as some quantities of newer armored vehicles. The exact number of T-34 in Cuba remains unknown, and its definition is associated with some difficulties. According to known data, in the Cuban army still serves several such tanks in the original configuration, and in addition, part of the tanks was redesigned into self-propelled artillery installations. A regular combat compartment with a turret was dismantled from them, instead of which open installations with artillery systems of various types were installed.


Tank T-34 in the GDR, 1953. Photo Bundesarchiv / bild.bundesarchiv.de


Quite large groups of T-34-85 tanks persist in some African states. Thus, The Military Balance 2018 reports that 30 of similar armored vehicles are still in use in the army of the Republic of Guinea. They form the basis of armored troops: in addition to three dozen T-34, Guinea has a total of 15 amphibious tanks PT-76 and 8 T-54. The neighboring Republic of Guinea-Bissau has a smaller army and a few tank troops. She continues to operate X-NUMX T-10-34 tanks. Unlike the neighboring country, these machines are inferior in number to the newer PT-85 - the latter number 76 units.

Another T-34-85 recipient in Africa was the Republic of Congo. In the past, this country was armed with several dozen such vehicles, with the help of which it was possible to build relatively efficient tank troops. Later, newer armored vehicles were obtained, and the T-34-85 were out of service. However, an unknown amount of such equipment is still present in the army on the sidelines and in storage.


A Soviet-made tank owned by the People’s Liberation Army of China. Photo of Wikimedia Commons


According to known data, a number of T-34 tanks can still remain in the armed forces of Namibia. However, their exact number and condition are unknown. Apparently, these machines are already unsuitable for use. The situation is similar with the armored forces of Mali. Until recently, the sources mentioned the presence of 20-21 tank T-34-85, but now they are decommissioned.

An unknown amount of T-34 is available in the army of the Republic of Chad. Previously, these tanks were in full operation, but so far all have been transferred to storage. Information from some sources suggests that in recent years the existing T-34-85 have been disposed of due to the development of the resource and as superfluous.


Armored vehicles of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Cuba, 1961 g. Photo by Wikimedia Commons


Until recently, the Republic of Yemen could be considered one of the most active operators of T-34 tanks. Before the start of the civil war, there was about 30 medium tanks of the Second World War period in its armed forces. After 2014, evidence of the use of T-34-85 tanks in battles repeatedly appeared. Some of this equipment was destroyed by the enemy, while other machines have finally exhausted their resources and can no longer be used. An assessment of the current state of the tank forces of the opposing sides and the determination of the number of remaining T-34 is not yet possible.

Finally, recently the People’s Army of Laos refused the T-34-85 tanks. She had three dozen of these machines, of which 10 were in active operation, while the others were in reserve. In accordance with the Russian-Lao agreement, a number of modern T-72B1 tanks went to an Asian country from Russia, and the decommissioned T-34 went back. As a result of this transaction, Laos left the list of operators of old tanks of the Soviet design.

Causes of longevity

Since the mid-forties, the Soviet Union regularly transferred decommissioned medium tanks T-34 to friendly foreign countries. From a certain time, two foreign countries licensed to manufacture Soviet tanks entered the international market for weapons and equipment. The USSR, Czechoslovakia and Poland, working both together and independently, sent many thousands of armored vehicles abroad and re-equipped nearly four dozen armies.


North Vietnamese tanks T-34. Photo Scalemodels.ru


Over the past decades, technology has become obsolete morally and physically, even by the standards of poor and small countries. As a result, the overwhelming majority of countries-operators were forced to write it off or send it to storage - almost always with replacement by newer samples. Nevertheless, about one and a half to two hundred T-34-85 tanks still remain in the top ten foreign countries, and in some of them still continue to serve.

Despite the unique history service during the Great Patriotic War and combat work during subsequent conflicts, the medium tank T-34-85 even with reservations can not be called modern and relevant actual requirements. Nevertheless, a significant number of such machines successfully continued service for many decades, and so far they are not abandoned. This development has several main reasons.

First of all, it is necessary to note the simplicity of the design and operation, high maintainability and other positive features of a technical nature. Even countries without a developed defense industry can cope with the operation and repair of T-34 tanks. In addition, as the experience of several foreign countries shows, the T-34-85 is a good platform for building new equipment for various purposes. At one time, Cuban-made self-propelled guns, assembled on the T-34 available chassis, became widely known. Possessing sufficiently high combat qualities, this technique was not particularly complex production.


Medium tank used during the war in Rhodesia. Photo Foto-history.livejournal.com


The second factor contributing to the continuation of the service of old tanks is associated with the capabilities and desires of the operators. Many countries in Asia and Africa would like to replace the outdated T-34 with something more new and efficient, but a weak economy does not allow them to even begin negotiations on procurement. A curious exception is Laos, who managed to negotiate with Russia on the purchase of new armored vehicles. From a certain point of view, it would seem that the Lao army, with a solid surcharge, exchanged the old T-34-85 for new T-72B1. At the same time, she literally jumped over several generations of armored vehicles.

Other countries, for one reason or another, cannot conclude the same contract, and therefore are forced to continue to operate the equipment of the middle of the last century. As the resource is developed, it has to be written off, including without a real chance of timely replacement with modern samples.


Overwhelmed T-34-85 in Yemen. Photo Foto-history.livejournal.com


With the financial capabilities of developing countries is another factor affecting the length of service of armored vehicles. If the country-operator of T-34 tanks cannot replace them with new cars, it is quite possible that its neighbors and geopolitical competitors are also forced to use outdated armored vehicles. As a result, the need for the speedy modernization of the army and the purchase of expensive imported products is lost. Such a confrontation of outdated technology can last for years and decades - up to the appearance of the desired capabilities and real threats.

Decades in the ranks

Medium tanks T-34-85 went into the series in the first half of the forties of the last century and soon had a significant impact on the course of the Second World War. However, the further development of armored vehicles transferred them to the category of obsolete and unsuitable for participation in a full-scale modern war. No longer needed medium tanks were sold to foreign countries, and this time they waited longer service.


Yemeni tanks are still able to fight. Shot from the frontline chronicles


The long-term operation of T-34 tanks in foreign countries was promoted by a number of specific factors, some of which can be considered negative - armies have to face real problems and difficulties. Nevertheless, despite the special nature, these factors led to known results. T-34 tanks continue to serve, although the number of active vehicles is constantly decreasing. Technique without the possibility of recovery has to be sent to storage or for disassembly.

In this regard, three dozen T-34, previously owned by the army of Laos, look really lucky. They were promptly serviced and repaired, thanks to which they remain on the move and are able to continue working. It is reported that the Russian military department will use them in military-historical events, when shooting movies, etc. This means that the legendary tanks will be preserved and will continue their service - but in a new capacity.

Based on:
http://mil.ru/
https://tass.ru/
https://rg.ru/
https://warspot.ru/
https://globalsecurity.org/
https://armyrecognition.com/
Solyankin A. G., Pavlov M. V., Pavlov I. V., Zheltov I. G. Domestic armored vehicles. XX century. - M .: Exprint, 2005. - T. 2. 1941 – 1945.
IISS The Military Balance 2017
IISS The Military Balance 2018
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    13 January 2019 05: 45
    on May 9, will the T-34 company go instead of the armature company?
    1. +16
      13 January 2019 06: 51
      And I agree with you, and, in general, it’s better to buy them out, or exchange them from African countries, for the same T72, with a small surcharge. We will gather from around the world a couple of hundred, and at their film studios, shoot a war using real technology of that time. In general, military parades, it is necessary to establish a tradition for the T34 company to open! !!
      1. +6
        13 January 2019 11: 32
        Yesterday I read on the site warhead.su too (an interesting site) that these tanks were produced in Czechoslovakia which are manufactured under license (approximately 2500 units were produced) and not in Nizhny Tagil and cannot be considered Soviet. They differ in several visual signs. In general, I’m talking about the drum where they were made, the main thing is to be used wisely.
      2. BAI
        +3
        13 January 2019 17: 40
        In the first half of the war (and even further) and the same parade on November 7, 1941, the T-34-76 is needed. Otherwise - profanity.
    2. +8
      13 January 2019 06: 58
      But is it really bad, even with them a platoon of t-34-76, but not remodels! soldier
      1. +5
        13 January 2019 08: 30
        still with them platoon t-34-76

        If I am not mistaken, there are several dozen of these tanks left, on the move units. And everyone stands in museums. Most were lost in the Second World War.
      2. +3
        13 January 2019 10: 29
        Do they exist somewhere? So, somewhere in the swamps or parts, but to find?
        1. +5
          13 January 2019 11: 19
          "Do such, exist somewhere? So, somewhere in the swamps or parts, but to find?"
          And what prevents those in the swamps from putting on the move? Are your hands full of fanfare?

          2011. One of the Bulgarian army’s rembases in Sliven receives a 4 German T1943 tank for restoration at the Museum of Military Glory in Yambolovo for restoration.
          1. +7
            13 January 2019 11: 23

            And this is the same tank at the exit.
            1. +8
              13 January 2019 11: 28

              The same repair plant in Sliven. The second in the "ranks" - Jagdpanzer T4 L 48, a rare car, which were released in 1977 pieces.
              1. +16
                13 January 2019 11: 41

                This T-34-76 was lifted from the bottom of the Don in the Voronezh region in July 2016. The tank was launched in 1942 at the STZ. Such made only a total of 1000 pieces.
                1. +16
                  13 January 2019 11: 55

                  And this photo was taken about in October last year on the banks of the Pripyat, in the Gomel region of Belarus. Inside, presumably, there may be a crew.
                  What or who is preventing the restoration of these machines, moreover, machines with a very specific history of military service? On the other hand, the rumble in the tulumbases about the "self-immeasurable" Patriot park does not subside. Only for him, Czech-made tanks are bought in Laos.
                  1. +3
                    13 January 2019 12: 25
                    I agree with you, but there are other thoughts
                  2. +10
                    13 January 2019 12: 47
                    Murmansk restorers and their chilling Arctic fox at the Sherman base. "For the Motherland", white edging, white star, USA Bulwarks from BMP-1, and on the DShK tower
                    1. +11
                      13 January 2019 12: 48
                      The tank was designed by the so-called "sewing troops"
                      1. +4
                        13 January 2019 13: 01
                        Murmansk restorers
                        ,, why Murmansk? if it was restored in Primorye.
                      2. +9
                        13 January 2019 13: 09
                        Quote: bubalik
                        if it was restored in Primorye.

                        You are right, I missed this point. The tank was sent for recovery from Murmansk in Primorye. "Specialists of the armored weapons storage base of the Eastern Military District (Arsenyev) restored the American Sherman medium tank, which was raised from the bottom of the Barents Sea. First, the" American "was delivered by an Il-76 military transport aircraft to Vladivostok, after which they Arsenyev to the armored weapons storage base. "
                        The reaction of Pasholok, one of our top tank historians:
                        Continuing the story of the unfortunate Medium Tank M4A2 (76) W, which ended up in Vladivostok after being evacuated from the American SS Thomas Donaldson transport. The very first reportage from the place where he was "restored" aroused conflicting feelings. However, the result exceeded all expectations.
                        The fact that the units from the BMP-1 are plugged into the unfortunate carcass is not so scary. In the end, over 70 years, everything has rusted so much that it can no longer be restored. The same can be said about the tracks, they have become unusable and can only be used for "static" purposes. But what they did next is already completely beyond the line of good and evil. Okay, the tracks, as I said, they are unusable, but above the undercarriage, in general, a nightmare. The Vladivostok demiurges stuck the front fenders of the T-54 / T-55, the side skirts were piled from the BMP-1, the handrails were attached, and the DShKM was mounted on the tower. Well, as a final chord, we painted it all in the color that Germans usually flaunt in our museums. The last one is completely alles, was there no khaki XB-518 in stock? You don't even have to talk about the headlights. Well, to top it off, they also depicted the "Loza's tank" # 936.
                        No wonder the Federation Council is deciphered as "Most Fleet". Yes, there was a handicap in the form of a tractor based on the M4A2E8, from which they took the transmission and chassis. But it was in the Northern Fleet for some reason that there were people who were interested in the fate of the car, who released it and when, who contacted the right people and received information. As a result, the M4A2 (76) W turned out to be quite authentic on the Northern Fleet. And in the rest of the places, it's either a dickhead, or this nightmare. And the question is not even for repairmen, whose task is not to restore equipment. Their task is to recover on the move. So he goes. And the question is for those characters in large caps with stripes, who still think that repair plants are obliged to do restoration. And no one knows how many of these exhibits will be mutilated.
                      3. +6
                        13 January 2019 13: 16
                        As for the "sewing troops" - I agree. In Murmansk - no. This is military unit 42817, Arseniev, Primorye.
        2. BAI
          +6
          13 January 2019 17: 50
          Do they exist somewhere? So, somewhere in the swamps or parts, but to find?

          There are many things you can find in the swamps.




          One person restored everything (and much more) - in the bottom photo - Sergey Chibineev.
    3. +1
      13 January 2019 17: 30
      30 T-34 is a tank battalion!
      1. 0
        20 January 2019 20: 26
        Exactly! Tank battalion of a tank regiment, a tank division! Shoulder straps and buttonholes are black. There in a tank platoon 3! tank. But in the tank platoon of the Tank regiment of the MSDivisia there are 4 tanks, and therefore in their company 13, in the battalion - 40. Epaulettes and buttonholes are red, with tanks!
    4. 0
      14 January 2019 11: 10
      there are few of them left. collectible tanks.
  2. +2
    13 January 2019 07: 34
    In the Red Scorpion with aDolf Lungren, the T-34 also played a role!
  3. +7
    13 January 2019 08: 46
    Why don't the French open parades on their Renault FT-17? After all, this is the tank of the Victory of the First World War, which broke the ridge of the Kaiser army, moreover, a revolutionary tank. Until now, tanks are doing the FT-17 concept: a single 360-degree rotating turret with a gun, front control compartment, fighting compartment in the middle, transmission and engine compartment at the rear.
    1. -5
      13 January 2019 09: 37
      Merkava looks at your opinion with bewilderment))))
      1. +12
        13 January 2019 10: 33
        Merkava is still pretty exotic. Other MBTs also look at her in bewilderment.
        1. 0
          13 January 2019 10: 45
          Well, yes)))
      2. 0
        13 January 2019 13: 56
        Quote: sds127
        Merkava looks at your opinion with bewilderment))))
        What about Merkava? The T-15 also deployed the T-14 carcass, as did the M-60.
      3. 0
        20 January 2019 20: 28
        Let be! We are holding it in the sight of our T-72!
    2. +4
      13 January 2019 13: 51
      Well, at least the victory in the 1st World War was not so unconditional. Berlin was not taken by the Anglo-French troops. Therefore, Victory Day is not celebrated, but the Day of WWII completion ... The T-34 was stormed by the Reichstag, but Renault FT-17 is unlikely ... Again, according to your logic, a gendarme parade is needed on Bastille Day , Landsknechtov and firing from arquebuses do? No, but what, cool! good
      1. +4
        13 January 2019 14: 20
        T-34 was quite stormed by the Reichstag, but Renault FT-17 was hardly.
        ,, yep, Renault FT-17 fought on the other side ,, winked

        After the fall of France, the Wehrmacht captured a total of 1704 standard and modified 31 Renault FT tanks. Panzerkampfwagen 17R 730c (f).
        even in the USSR stopped by

        Lutsk, 1943.
      2. 0
        13 January 2019 19: 34
        The Germans overcame fighting 40 km from Paris, and not the Anglo-Franks - at Berlin. Our revolution, like a wick, crawled across Germany and Austria-Hungary. The mood of the soldier is a powerful and vanishing factor.
    3. +1
      13 January 2019 13: 55
      Quote: Kot_Kuzya
      Until now, tanks are doing the concept of FT-17
      We have MS-1. Of course, not quite the FT-17 ...
  4. +6
    13 January 2019 09: 30
    The long-term operation of T-34 tanks in foreign countries was facilitated by a number of specific factors, some of which can be considered negative - the armies have to deal with real problems and difficulties.

    2016 year. Yemen. It can be seen that there are indeed "real problems and difficulties".
    The crew does not even run the risk of firing a cannon while in the tank, so it adapted a rope stretched through a hole in the armor.
    1. +3
      13 January 2019 10: 44
      From this tank, you can apparently shoot only at stationary targets, but not at all dynamic.
      1. +3
        13 January 2019 10: 50
        Why? You fix the time required to "evacuate" the gunner from the tank and take a lead, taking this time into account. If the target is moving in a straight line, there is a chance of hitting.
        1. +6
          13 January 2019 11: 11
          Victor, only the Lobachevsky are fighting in Yemen? wink
          1. +5
            13 January 2019 12: 07
            I will not say for Yemen, but among the Libyan Berbers there were very smart guys.
        2. Alf
          0
          13 January 2019 22: 51
          Quote: Decimam
          there is a chance to get.

          There is. A little more than zero. ,
          Quote: Decimam
          You record the time required to "evacuate" the gunner from the tank

          He fixed 5 seconds (the figure from the bulldozer), calculated the parameters from this, and the basmach jumped out after 7. Shooting "towards the target"?
          1. +1
            13 January 2019 23: 42
            A sense of humor is such a thing, it is either there or not.
        3. 0
          20 January 2019 20: 32
          The master's case is afraid !!! And the Yemenis, those are still fighters !!! The American ship was covered with "Tochka" ... a scoundrel burned for several days! Such beauty was !!!!
    2. +6
      13 January 2019 12: 40
      Quote: Decimam
      stretched through a hole in the armor.

      This is my friend pistol port.
      1. +3
        13 January 2019 12: 50
        Yes you are right. It seemed to me that the hole for a personal weapon is a bit low.
        1. 0
          20 January 2019 20: 34
          So the loader stands almost on the bottom of the hull (there, under the tower, there’s only a raised floor)
    3. 0
      13 January 2019 16: 07
      Are you interested in the crew?
    4. +1
      14 January 2019 01: 09
      Hole, excuse me, in a completely different place, and this is an embrasure for firing from personal weapons.
      1. WW2
        +2
        14 January 2019 01: 15
        Quote: Slinqshot
        Hole, excuse me, in a completely different place, and this is an embrasure for firing from personal weapons.

        Isn't this embrasure a hole? laughing
        1. +1
          14 January 2019 01: 17
          Hole!!! Use technical terms hi
          1. WW2
            +2
            14 January 2019 01: 18
            Quote: Slinqshot
            Hole!!!

            And the hole, is it not a hole? laughing
            Quote: Slinqshot
            Use technical terms

            Why?
            1. 0
              14 January 2019 01: 22
              Incidentally, I myself recently learned about the existence of these "loopholes" in the tower 85x
          2. 0
            20 January 2019 20: 34
            Well, like yeah !!!
        2. +2
          14 January 2019 01: 21
          A comrade apparently wanted to say that a hole is a positively charged carrier in a semiconductor, and a hole in a tower.
      2. +1
        14 January 2019 01: 18
        I really wanted to write? Have you tried to read the comments before writing?
        1. 0
          14 January 2019 01: 20
          I will consider your proposal. When I find it valuable.
          1. 0
            14 January 2019 01: 25
            How can a proposal be evaluated without considering it?
            1. 0
              14 January 2019 01: 29
              And you think for yourself. Especially before asking stupid questions, imagining yourself to be a palemics master. Good night. hi
              1. 0
                14 January 2019 01: 32
                You need to think. Well, you are going to accept the proposal first, considering it valuable, and then think it over. Although the "palemics" may be so. And Happy New Year to you!
                But buy a spelling dictionary.
                1. +1
                  14 January 2019 07: 15
                  You are like that woman in the bazaar - you need to have the last word. As I understand it, there was nothing more to get to the bottom of - we got to the bottom of the spelling. I thought that the level of such arguments had grown on this site. Well, do not be offended when the next time, in the language of the classics, they start poking you with "her face in her mug" for the slightest spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors. Good luck.
  5. +5
    13 January 2019 09: 34
    “It’s still not clear, the t-34 in Russia should have remained at the storage bases (my opinion), even on television they showed the storage base near Krasnoyarsk, where the t-34 is still of military issue.


    “Or is it on account of writing off $ 960 million of Laos debt from $ 1,3 billion, well, by the way.
    1. 0
      13 January 2019 21: 10
      Quote: bubalik
      “It’s still not clear, the t-34 in Russia should have remained at the storage bases (my opinion), even on television they showed the storage base near Krasnoyarsk, where the t-34 is still of military issue.

      Yes, they were shot for a long time at the training grounds, and if anything remains, then it is already inoperative.
    2. +1
      20 January 2019 20: 38
      I remember the Russian media trumpeted and trumpeted that in Ukraine they sold everything! And in Russia there were storage bases with T-34-85 and there were not dozens of them there and the safety for 1991 was the highest! Where have you been since 1991?
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. +3
    13 January 2019 16: 50
    1. When transporting the T-34, the turret was always turned back with a gun. And in the pictures we see some kind of parade.
    2. In Kamchatka, in the early 90s, there were also many T-34s along the coast. Has everything been stolen to metal?
  9. +2
    13 January 2019 18: 44
    Well and good. There will be at least normal tanks in films to shoot and not masked T54 that the eye cuts right away.
    1. Alf
      0
      13 January 2019 22: 53
      Quote: evgen1221
      Well and good. There will be at least normal tanks in films to shoot and not masked T54 that the eye cuts right away.

      Zananerenny T-54 is garbage, but when naked Msta acts in the role of Ferdinand, this is already something ...
    2. WW2
      0
      14 January 2019 01: 22
      Quote: evgen1221
      Well and good. There will be at least normal tanks in films to shoot and not masked T54 that the eye cuts right away.

      In normal cinema, equipment has long been drawn on computers, not removed.
      1. 0
        15 January 2019 03: 29
        Is it normal? Cinema, it should be CINEMA, not computer animation ...!
  10. 0
    13 January 2019 20: 58
    Reportedly, the Russian military will use them in military-historical events, when shooting movies, etc.

    Yes, they had shot their T-34s for a long time at the training grounds, but to shoot films or modern equipment they had camouflaged, or made replicas. Thanks to Laos for keeping these veterans so well. Maybe we’ll see them in the movie about the war.
    1. -1
      14 January 2019 01: 15
      And they will trot 41s instead of 85s in films about the 76st year. And, of course, a tank battle: against an avalanche of 30 "thirty-four" a pair of German shells 3 or 4.
      1. 0
        14 January 2019 21: 19
        Well, in many Soviet (post-Soviet) films, this is not what happened. Only in recent years 10 already try to select, and often just draw (computer technology allows), historically reliable technology.
        1. 0
          15 January 2019 10: 24
          No, well, of course, the graphics are. But all the cool directors say that an authentic live technique is better.
  11. 0
    20 January 2019 20: 06
    In terms of workmanship and rinks, these tanks are very similar to the T-34-85 of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, and not of Our Soviet assembly at all! I can’t say 100% because I didn’t see this equipment live, but the Czechoslovak had time!
  12. 0
    24 August 2020 20: 56
    A legendary tank. How many things made today will function in 80 years.