Another Lend-Lease. Light multipurpose armored personnel carrier M3А1 "Scout Car"

47
The next hero of our series is known to many. Someone saw him in the exhibitions of museums. Someone was surprised at his appearance on the shots of military newsreels. And someone exploited his "Soviet son".

Another Lend-Lease. Light multipurpose armored personnel carrier M3А1 "Scout Car"




Our hero, as was the case with many "Americans" of that period, was indeed a novelty for the USSR. Even during the Patriotic War, when military equipment appeared at our enterprises in record time, nothing of the kind was created.

The reason for such disregard for the creation of such equipment in the USSR was not only the standard lag of Soviet industry from the US industry, but also the sufficient saturation of the corresponding parts with machines of other classes. But with the same tasks.

So, today we will talk about the light multipurpose armored personnel carrier МХNUMXА3 Scout Car (reconnaissance vehicle). The one that still raises questions for the majority of museum visitors with its buffer rotating drum mounted in front of the hull. By the way, this drum later became the "chip" of most US armored vehicles of that period.



It should not start with the design and stories creation, and from the reasons for the emergence of the very idea of ​​creating such machines.

30-40-s 20 centuries are characterized by the rapid development of armored vehicles in all the leading armies of the world. The motor age dictated its conditions for a future war. Their speeds and their solutions for a variety of units, including intelligence.

Most designers from different countries have taken the path of creating lightweight tanks and armored reconnaissance vehicles. In principle, the decision was logical. Light, high-speed tanks or armored cars really could serve as the vanguard of tank units and formations. And the presence of light armor protected the crew from enemy bullets and fragments. Plus, the mobility of the scout allowed him, in which case, simply to break contact with the enemy that suddenly appeared, that is, in other words, to wash off.

At first glance, small armored vehicles and light tanks were fully consistent with the military tasks assigned to them. But it is at first glance. In fact, in the work of these machines was a significant drawback. It is in the intelligence part.

The size of these scouts significantly reduced the number of crew members. Moreover, each crew member had his own duties. When getting into a combat situation, the crew was not so much engaged in reconnaissance as it was fighting with the enemy.

And the second drawback. Already more specific. When conducting reconnaissance positions of the enemy, in most cases, the machine must be left at some distance from the enemy. A direct observation should lead a scout on foot.

This is where the dog is buried. The crew during the conduct of intelligence has no right to leave the car! The commander of the reconnaissance unit is simply forced to either violate the procedure established by the charter and deprive the crew of the crew member of the vehicle necessary to conduct the battle, or conduct reconnaissance in force, causing fire on himself.

In other cases, intelligence results were more than questionable. At the level of "unverified data." And the battle itself on poorly protected machines was more than a dubious event. The armored vehicle was easily amazed not only by artillery, but also by large-caliber machine guns.

It follows that an armored vehicle for reconnaissance units should be used not so much as a combat vehicle, but as a vehicle for the delivery and evacuation of intelligence officers. But, at the same time, she should be well-armed enough to support the departure of the group in the event of its detection.

The first to come to such conclusions were the Americans. It was the American military that, back in 30, they started talking about the creation of an armored personnel carrier. At the beginning of 30-ies, the US military department formulated quite stringent requirements for such machines. Then the name of scout vehicles (Scout) appeared.

Subsequently, during the operation of these conveyors, this name is most often used when they are indicated in official documents. The alphanumeric index of the US Army was almost never used.

How were the first armored reconnaissance vehicles built in the USA?

The first such car, traditionally for the United States, is based on the commercial white lorry white indiana 4x4. Call this first armored car armored personnel carrier was difficult. More precisely, a full-fledged armored personnel carrier. Created by White Motor Corporation in 1933, the prototype received the designation T7. And subsequently, the army designation M1.



The M1 was equipped with the Hercules I carburetor 6-cylinder engine with a displacement of 4,6 l and a power of 75 hp. The top-opened body of the car had 12,7-mm frontal, 7,62-mm fodder and 6,35-mm side armor, providing protection from bullets and small pieces of shells.

The reconnaissance armament was very powerful: two 12,7-mm large-caliber Brawning M2 machine guns in front of the hull and two 7,62-mm Brawning M1919-X4 on its sides.



Alas, after testing at the test site, it was decided to release only 76 of such vehicles to arm two armored cavalry battalions in Fort Knox (Kentucky). The history of the Scout Car M1 is over.

But the success of М1 inspired other companies to create "scouts". Moreover, the designers went again in the traditional way.

Already in 1935, another prototype was created - the T9. And it was created by a competitor firm Corbitt & Co. The fate of this prototype was exactly the same as that of the M1. Limited edition and ... oblivion. But some important changes that were later included in the next version should be noted.

As a base, the chassis of a commercial truck was still used, but it installed the 8-cylinder engine Lycoming New Corbitt Eight hp 95 engine.

The layout of the car did not change much, but the armament was reduced to two machine guns M1919A4 located on the sides. The main difference option М2А1 became rail-tire, covering the entire armored body along the perimeter. On this rail, with the help of special mobile grippers, machine guns were installed and could be moved.

By the way, M2 became the “father” of another interesting solution that is used everywhere today. One version of this Scout was the T5EXNNXX self-propelled mortar, 1 caliber inch. True to shoot from the body, as they do today, the mortar could not, but still. The mortar with the help of a special device was installed behind the car body and fired from there.



In materials about trucks, we often mention the firm Marmon Herrington from Indianapolis. The one that was engaged in the modification of cars "Ford". Especially for the needs of the army.

Naturally, the “Marmon” could not pass by such a tasty morsel as reconnaissance vehicles. They developed two Scouts at once. In 1935, the A75SSA reconnaissance vehicle, similar in its characteristics to the M2, was presented to the military for trial.



It was equipped with a Ford V8 8 85-cylinder engine with HP. and developed speeds up to 120 km / h, however, the American army was not interested. A slightly more fortunate other car, the T13, built on the chassis of a commercial Ford-Marmon-Herrington 1-ton truck: The National Guard ordered 38 units in 1937 this year.



But what about the pioneers? White Motor Company did not “fight” with competitors, but chose the way of further modernization М2А1. An interesting fact is the modernization of not only the engine, the new version received a 5-liter Hercules JXD engine with 110 horsepower, but also the body itself.

The corps, in the variant already adopted by the army, is traditionally considered inviolable. Its changes are always associated with complications when accepting a new car. However, White went to change both the hull and the look of the car.

М3 received armor plate in front of the radiator, which was located at a rational angle, which increased its bulletproofness. And the thickness of the armor was increased to 12,7 mm.

In 1938, this modernized armored personnel carrier was standardized by the US Army under the symbol M3. And again the car went to the troops in a small series. Before 1940, 64 units of this version of the machine were released. All of them went to the 13 Cavalry Regiment and the 7 Cavalry Mechanized Brigade.



The experience of using these armored personnel carriers was generally positive. It was planned to organize the mass production of M3 for the intelligence units of the American army. However, already in 1939, the White Motor Company presents an updated version of the body. Somewhere even revolutionary.

The new machine had an elongated hull aft. The width of the body was increased, it exceeded the outer envelope of the rear wheels. The configuration of the side doors and the design of the front sheet of the body have changed, the door in its stern wall was eliminated.

In front of the hull, or rather, in front of it, a buffer rotary drum appeared, which became a characteristic detail of American armored personnel carriers of the Second World War period.

It is in this building that we know Scout. In the US Army, he received the index MXNXA3. And it was this armored personnel carrier that went into series in 1.



What is the Scout M3A1 from the point of view of design.



In terms of assembling the M3А1 chassis, it was a typical all-wheel drive (4х4) 1940-s light truck with a transfer case, which was installed separately from the gear box and was connected to it by an intermediate shaft.

The Scout had a fully armored, open-top hull, in front of which there was an engine, and behind it was a control compartment and a landing unit. Armored Corps had a different reservation. The thickness of the armor of the frontal hull of the body of the M3А1 armored personnel carrier was 12,7 mm, and all other sheets - 6,35 mm.









Sometimes there is a question about the appropriateness of an open roof on the body of an armored personnel carrier. The answer is simple: the designers refused additional doors in the aft part of the body. The doors are preserved only for the driver and commander. Thus, for the rapid evacuation of personnel, as well as loading and unloading, the roof would become an obstacle. And so - jump, and all. Or climb under the rail. Not the most convenient method, but where the headspace is a soft canvas cushion.



And the second. In firing from the side of the machine, the machine-gunners used the rail-bus, borrowed from Corbitt М2А1. Thus, the shooting was carried out over the side. In the same way, soldiers of the landing force acted, providing a circular sector of fire.

The standard armament of the M3A1 version was the large-caliber 12,7-mm machine gun М2 and the 7,62-mm machine gun М1919А4. The loaded ammunition consisted of 8 thousands of 7,62 caliber cartridges mm and 600-750 12,7 mm caliber cartridges. Boxes, equipped with machine-gun belts, were placed in two boxes, located on the sides of the body.

Machine guns were not installed stationary, but on a special system of the mobile machine M22. It was this system that allowed machine guns to move machine guns practically throughout the entire armored personnel carrier of the BTR.

By the way, on some BTR M3А1, instead of the М1919А4 machine gun, an 7,62-mm Browning М1917А1 machine gun with a water-cooled system was installed. In the variant of the Soviet army, the machine gun Maxim was also installed there. But this is the exception rather than the rule.

To increase the reliability of the undercarriage, wheels with reinforced multilayer tires with anti-bullet filler were used. The Scout had a very high speed on the road (up to 90 km / h), but limited mobility on rough terrain and could not ensure the proper mobility of the motorized infantry.










Riding on the gas tank ... Well, there is something in it, right?











Today it sounds strange, but it was the limited mobility over rough terrain that made the Scouts not very welcome in the American army. But, on the other hand, their versatility amazed.

The armored personnel carriers performed not only the functions of reconnaissance vehicles, but also tractors, freely moving 37-mm anti-tank guns, ambulances, carrying lightly wounded or 2 lightly wounded, staff vehicles and artillery observers on one 3 flight.

Since 1942, the Scouts have become the standard armament of armored cavalry squadrons of tank and then infantry divisions of the US Army. Since March, 1943 has had 13 armored personnel carriers in each armored cavalry platoon: three in the command group (these vehicles were simultaneously 37-mm anti-tank guns), one in the reconnaissance group and nine “scouts” in three reconnaissance sections.

Scout М3А1 is widely known not only in European theaters, but also in Canada and Australia. The United States supplied armored personnel carriers to the Canadian and Australian armies, the troops of the Free French, the Polish, Belgian and Czechoslovak armies. And of course the USSR.



The first М3А1 were Canadian and Australian units; the British army accepted them only in May 1941. Used M3A1 in the headquarters units of the regiments and brigades. Soon they began to be used as ambulances and artillery observers.

In the tank and armored car parts "Scouts" for quite a long time served as commander and communication vehicles equipped with a powerful radio station. However, soon each squadron in the regiments of armored vehicles received a platoon of riflemen and four Scouts to transport them. In the second half of 1944, the Scouts in the British Army were already in almost all British motorized infantry battalions.

The fate of the Scouts, which were supplied to the USSR under a lend-lease, is interesting. The first deliveries of these machines began at the beginning of 1942. The fact is that in the documents of that period these machines did not even have a single name. You can find at least three different names for this type of technology. Armored personnel carrier, armored vehicle and semi-armored vehicle. And all this is “Scout” М3А1.



The car was so unusual that the Soviet command was forced to organize the training of crews for these armored personnel carriers in a training regiment specially created on the basis of the 20 tank regiment in Uryupinsk, and from 1 in March 1942 in Ryazan. In parallel, in the 3-m Saratov School of armored vehicles and armored personnel carriers trained technical personnel and retrained officers and non-commissioned officers to command the units of these armored personnel carriers.

"Scouts" have become the most massive and most popular armored personnel carriers in the Red Army. They were used in the same way as in the Allied forces, mainly as reconnaissance and staff vehicles. The reconnaissance of a tank or mechanized brigade had 3-4 М3А1, a corps reconnaissance battalion - 6-8, and an army motorcycle regiment - 13-16.



Cars were really loved by soldiers and officers. And for an example of the combat use of this BTR, let's take a description of the actions of the reconnaissance company of the 28 Guards Mechanized Brigade of the 8 Guards Tank Corps during the liberation of Poland in August 1944.

"South of the village of Lenin in a beam, the enemy ambushed. Reaching into the beam, the column of 28 control vehicles of the Guards Mechanized Brigade was suddenly fired from the left flank and frontally from the factory buildings of the village.
Left to the left two divisions of intelligence under the command of Lieutenant Alekseychuk riveted the attention of the ambush of the enemy. Meanwhile, four armored personnel carriers М3А1 of a separate reconnaissance company under the command of the deputy chief of staff of the intelligence brigade of the guard, Major Tifonov, opened heavy squatting automatic-machine-gun fire at the enemy.
As a result, the Nazis 30, seeing the hopeless situation, abandoned weapon and surrendered, the rest, who was in the gully (before 60 soldiers and officers), was destroyed. Only individual Nazis up to 30 people, entrenched in the building, continued to conduct strong automatic and machine-gun fire, shooting through the road on which the column of vehicles had to move.
The two M3А1 armored personnel carriers sent forward, under the command of Senior Sergeant Starostin and Sergeant Lieberman, approached the factory building and opened hurricane fire on the windows, forcing the enemy to stop resistance. The two anti-tank guns of the 2 motorized rifle battalion, which came to the rescue, completed the ambush of the enemy. "



Thick cavalry mustache and professorial glasses. That's right, Colonel-General Pavel Alekseevich Rotmistrov. And behind him is a Scout.

Scout М3А1 was produced before 1944 of the year. A total of 20 994 armored personnel carrier descended from the conveyors of the plant. Of these, 3 034 machines were supplied to the USSR.

And the traditional technical data of the hero of the material:



Combat weight BTR, t: 5,62
Crew, people: 1-2
Landing, people: 5-7



Overall dimensions (LBH), mm: 5626 x 2032 x 1994
Base mm: 3327
Track, mm: 1657
Ground clearance mm: 400



Reservation
Steel armor, surface hardened
Body forehead, mm: 12,7
Board, mm: 6,35

weaponry
Machine gun 12,7-mm М2НВ - 1 (b / c to 700 cartridges);
Machine gun 7,62-mm М1919А4 - 2 (b / c to 8000 cartridges).

Engine
Inline, 6-cylinder, carburetor, liquid cooling, Hercules JXD
Power, hp: 110
Speed ​​(highway), km / h: 91
Cruising (highway) km: 400



Overcomes barriers:
rise, hail: 30
wall, m: 0,3
ford, m: 0,7



But on this material is impossible to finish. Just because there was one important question for our military equipment. Whose "father" "Scout" М3А1? This statement at the beginning of the article requires proof.

Soviet designers during the war dealt with many problems. Alas, the priority armored personnel carriers were not listed. American and British cars successfully filled this flaw. Yes, and production facilities were engaged in the release of other types of weapons and equipment, for example, tanks and self-propelled guns, more useful at that current time.

The USSR simply did not even have such trucks that could become the basis for the development of an armored personnel carrier. Only in 1944, the tests of the Soviet GAZ-63 began.



A characteristic feature of this car were wide tires 9,75-18 and lean-to the rear wheels, which had the same track as the front. When driving through mud, snow, sand, all the wheels went “next to the next” without experiencing additional rolling resistance due to the difference in track width.

On state tests of all-wheel drive vehicles GAZ-63 demonstrated, as noted in the report of the Main Automobile and Tractor Office of the Red Army, "record-breaking throughput".

At the beginning of 1947, in the OKB of the Gorky Automobile Plant, headed by V.A. Dedkov, the design of a light two-axle 141 object, designed to carry eight infantry, the Scout, began in a Soviet way. V.K. was appointed lead designer. Scar. GAZ-63 chassis was used for this car, reducing the base by mm 600 and increasing the engine power by hp 10.

Several armored personnel carriers were designed and built, but only in 1949 the armored personnel carrier successfully passed state tests and was adopted by the Soviet Army under the designation BTR-40.



At the end of 1950, the mass production of the car began at the Gorky Molotov Automobile Plant, and its creators were awarded the Stalin Prize. The armored corps was manufactured by the Murom steam engine repair plant.

It was this Soviet descendant of the American "Scout" that many saw in parades and in museums ...
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    22 December 2018 06: 35
    Thank. The author, as always, is on top, very detailed, interesting. The car, frankly, was not particularly impressed. Not very comfortable, not too passable, although the roller instead of the bumper is interesting. Drew attention to the ax. A good hatchet hatchet, the handle is long, not short-carpentry. The blow intensified and, for example, a tree that interferes with the passage could be cut faster than an example. Thought out. Armament is also not weak. Normal medium technique.
    1. +16
      22 December 2018 16: 51
      You succeeded: "not very comfortable, not too passable" is from the position of today, but then for the Red Army, it seemed like a royal carriage + powerful weapons and a long-range radio. The Red Army did not know anything like this at that time
      1. 0
        22 December 2018 17: 01
        I just compare this car and others from the same series.
        1. +5
          23 December 2018 11: 32
          This is the first of a series. Of course, later more advanced designs appeared, but at the beginning of the 40s it was a breakthrough in design ideas.
  2. +1
    22 December 2018 07: 05
    Thank! As always, exhaustively, very interesting!
  3. +2
    22 December 2018 07: 30
    which still raises questions from most visitors to museums with its rotary buffer drum

    AND? To overcome the obstacles?
    It is a pity there is no photo from the stern, I saw there a step and a tripod for machine guns.
    1. +9
      22 December 2018 09: 12
      Quote: Puncher
      It is a pity there is no photo from the stern, I saw there a step and a tripod for machine guns.

      http://kulikov.woya.ru/news/19281/
  4. +5
    22 December 2018 08: 25
    Yes, it’s a very necessary and useful machine for the victory.
  5. +2
    22 December 2018 09: 09
    It was this Soviet descendant of the American “Scout” that many saw at parades and in museums.

    As a child, I even had the HAPPINESS to ride on this, on arable land and after the rains. Delight was "over the roof". good
  6. +1
    22 December 2018 09: 43

    Machine gun turret M30.
  7. +1
    22 December 2018 10: 38
    The skating rink is useless, well, if only to hobble, pack the asphalt. Even if you use it to climb up, you’ll sit on your belly. The panel is a cigarette lighter, cool. The front end I do not understand is turned off or not, I do not see the lever. I'm sitting on the tank, and in front of the face 40 liters of gasoline is this normal? between devices, as I understand it, a sump with manual pumping of fuel.
    1. +1
      24 December 2018 12: 49
      Quote: Free Wind
      I'm sitting on the tank, and in front of the face 40 liters of gasoline is this normal?

      This is the norm! © smile
      On Soviet armored vehicles, the gas tank was generally above the driver’s head. This fire shower, EMNIP, was removed only on the BA-10M.
  8. +3
    22 December 2018 10: 53
    I * Scout * from * Stars * came in a tented version, but from the non-tented one it differed only in a slightly different assembly instruction and this part, and everything else was the same, including machine guns! Well, how could I miss such a thrill !! In addition, the tent covered the interior of the airborne squad. And why did I try then? unearthed in his rubble * Modeller * with an article by Baryatinsky, figured ... Collected! THE BEAUTY!! Wheels spin, machine guns go up and down! By the way, judging by the model -12,7 mm * Browning * could shoot at air targets
  9. +6
    22 December 2018 10: 59
    Regarding the BTR-40- a few years ago, our police special forces covered the hacienda of some cool blatar and found a BTR-40 chassis in the garage. And the guys a trip to Chechnya soon shone. They podshamanili his little- and with themselves! there was a report in the news
    1. -4
      22 December 2018 15: 42
      Quote: serg.shishkov2015
      our police special forces covered the hacienda of some cool blatar and found a BTR-40 undercarriage in the garage. And the guys a trip to Chechnya soon shone. They podshamanili his little- and with themselves! there was a report in the news

      Those. stolen?
      Is stealing from the rich good?
      1. +2
        23 December 2018 08: 06
        I just stated a fact from the life of the BTR-40, and what is good and what is bad, I told my students ,,,, once, in a past life ,,,
      2. +1
        25 December 2018 19: 45
        The term confiscated will suit you more?
        There is another option - took a long-term lease)
  10. +1
    22 December 2018 11: 52
    Could the latches be in the basic configuration? Filthy weld seam, most likely homemade.
  11. +6
    22 December 2018 11: 53
    In our regiment in each tank battalion, in the command platoon, there was one BTR-40 as a communications vehicle. I rode it when we went to training or shooting, I liked the car, but only in the summer, in winter the armor froze, and there was no heating, and we put a "stove" in it, and the pipe was taken out into the shooting cell by opening the hatch. A funny moment: in a neutral car, this beter, quietly humming, was crawling at a snail's speed, but it was practically not heard. Near Blagoveshchensk, during firing with a regular shell, they drove AWOL for vodka and everyone was happy.
    Thanks to the authors for the comprehensive and beautiful material. I talked with pleasure. hi
  12. jjj
    0
    22 December 2018 11: 58
    Yes, the car meets the concept of war on the roads. The Red Army used foot marches and tank landings. Delivery of soldiers on tanks was at that time in the conditions of World War II almost the best option. This practice was applied much later: in both Chechen ones. Although transformed. Armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles appeared in the USSR
  13. 0
    22 December 2018 14: 37
    article, thanks, interesting. but it was probably all the same not in Poland, the village of Lenin ??? (although the eastern part may)
    1. 0
      22 December 2018 16: 03
      laughing Material about the battle is taken from archival documents. By time, place and participants there were no questions
  14. +3
    22 December 2018 15: 03
    As a child, I read Tretyakov's book Spring at the End of Summer.
    In it, the front-line writer describes in great detail the actions of his "flying" sapper detachment, which was part of a separate regiment of heavy self-propelled guns making their way through the Carpathians. The armored car in the novel, as one of the main characters --- helped out more than once and did not fail. How, then, when reading, I missed the illustration of this technique ... The article is gorgeous, but I also recommend the book. She will supplement the description of the machine with the tactics of its use.
    1. 0
      22 December 2018 16: 57
      I will look on the Internet
  15. +2
    22 December 2018 15: 35
    Good article! Respect! Looking at the BTR-40, one can see how Soviet industry picked up the idea, developed it and took the best of scouts. Starting from the layout, which, by the way, was sourly reworked and ending with such an elementary thing as the antenna of a radio station.
    P.S. In reality, the union could pile something similar back in the 30s. based on the same triaxial chassis gas AA. But the task was set for a purely artillery armored personnel carrier, unfortunately.
    1. Alf
      +3
      22 December 2018 19: 10
      Quote: dgonni
      In reality, the union could pile something similar back in the 30s. based on the same triaxial chassis gas AA.

      The three-axle GAZ-AAA had a 6x4 formula and twin rear wheels. On the cross as an armored personnel carrier there was no question.
    2. +2
      24 December 2018 12: 55
      Quote: dgonni
      P.S. In reality, the union could pile something similar back in the 30s. based on the same triaxial chassis gas AA.

      I will tell you more - an armored personnel carrier based on GAZ-AAA with a capacity of 10 people was even built in iron.

      As a result, the army and designers once again realized that without a car engine with a power of more than 100 hp and all-wheel drive to take on a wheeled armored personnel carrier is meaningless.
      1. Low engine power.
      2. The height of the armored hull does not meet the requirements of camouflage.
      3. Small angle of inclination and thickness of the armor.
      4. Bulletproof housing is not suitable - protects only from simple bullets.
      5. Hatches and body doors are not tight.
      1. 0
        28 December 2018 08: 58
        after testing, the BA-22 was put into operation by a specialized institution; it was created as a sanitary BA. if memory serves, the Research Institute of Sanitation
  16. 0
    22 December 2018 17: 15
    As a child, I once talked to a frontman. He said that he was in a motorized rifle unit. I flashed my erudition, said about the armored personnel carrier, and he said that there were 2 armored personnel carriers for the whole regiment: a regiment commander and a guard. During the battles, the armored personnel carrier was used by the guards as an "ambulance": the Germans ate, they sat down somewhere and interfered with the advance, they sent the armored personnel carrier and from a distance of 50-60 meters (it is impossible to get closer: they envy grenades) opened machine-gun fire ..
  17. +1
    22 December 2018 18: 23
    Reservation
    Steel armor, surface hardened
    Body forehead, mm: 12,7
    Board, mm: 6,35

    The thickness of the armor up to hundredths of a millimeter coincides with the popular caliber of small arms. There are coincidences! Or was there any special meaning?
    1. 0
      22 December 2018 18: 59
      There was no point. Competitors. The original M1 version is quick: forehead 12,7 mm, sides 6,35 mm, feed 7 mm. Only competitors armor was placed at angles to increase protection, and on the M3 it has a vertical on the sides and aft. Tilt only on the forehead ..
      By the way, our armored personnel carriers-40 were originally also made like German armored personnel carriers, with a narrowing to the bottom. However, they refused because of the large loss of area inside the car ..
      1. +2
        22 December 2018 19: 06
        It seems to me what’s the matter. In the United States, armor thicknesses and calibers are measured in inches and fractions of an inch. 12,7 mm is half an inch, 6,35 mm is 1/4 inch.
    2. Alf
      +1
      22 December 2018 19: 12
      Quote: Sergey Mikhailovich Karasev
      Or was there any special meaning?

      It was. All sizes in the USA of those years went in inch measurement.
  18. +3
    22 December 2018 21: 34
    Thank you for the article with beautiful photos about my favorite Armored Car. smile
    Probably the most desirable to receive such a "package" ... after all, 20 units were produced.
    http://military-photo.com/unsorted/683-photo.html
    There was also an option from Chrysler ...

    Chrysler Scout ½-ton 4x4 Reconnaissance Car '1941
    M3A1 Scout Car (G-067) '1940–44 in dynamics ...

    The USSR simply did not even have such trucks that could become the basis for the development of armored personnel carriers.

    The trucks were ...

    GAZ-AAA '1934–07.1943 (Produced in 37 copies)

    ZiS-6 '07.1933 .41–21 (Produced in 239 copies)
    But, unfortunately, they short-sightedly preferred to make armored cars (I would even call them light wheeled tanks).

    Armored vehicles BA 10 and BA 6 from the 18th Tank Brigade during the counter-offensive near Moscow, November 1941.
    1. Alf
      0
      23 December 2018 22: 12
      Quote: VictorZhivilov
      The USSR simply did not even have such trucks that could become the basis for the development of armored personnel carriers.
      The trucks were ..

      And how many of them were four-wheel drive?
      The power of the dvigun in the ZIS-6 is 50 mares, in the GAZ-AAA 73 horses, in the Scout-101 cloven-hoofed. Which of these trucks would be suitable for an all-wheel drive armored personnel carrier?
    2. +1
      24 December 2018 13: 01
      Quote: VictorZhivilov
      The trucks were ...

      You can immediately forget about the ZIS-6 - this chassis was extremely scarce and was urgently needed for PARM, gas oil and other special equipment, the production of which was limited by the lack of chassis (according to the report of the head of the GABTU Fedorenko). It is not for nothing that practically all cannon BAs were made on the GAZ chassis.
      And the GAZ-AAA chassis is not suitable for an armored personnel carrier - which has been tested in practice (BA-22).
  19. +2
    22 December 2018 23: 08
    Grandfather on this was wounded near Königsberg. The car was overturned by a close gap, and his leg was crushed by the side. The bone was collected from pieces. Then, after the war, he had to relieve himself of his disability - otherwise he would not be hired by the locomotive brigade. And before retiring with great difficulty to recover. I remember that he periodically went to the hospital in the regional center - to get a new pair of shoes, in which one sole was 3 cm thicker.
  20. +3
    23 December 2018 01: 20
    Excellent article, many thanks to the authors! And what a great photo documentary series ?! Well, yes, a sinner, I like the American equipment, it is very reliable and at the same time very comfortable ... It was Aerokorby or Boston, but Scouts ... And without 500.000 American only trucks that solved the problem of mobility of the Red Army in 43- 44, there are serious doubts that we would be in Berlin in 1945 ...

    Most designers from different countries took the path of creating light tanks and armored reconnaissance vehicles. In principle, the decision was logical. Light, high-speed tanks or armored cars could really fulfill the role of the avant-garde of tank units and formations. And the presence of light armor protected the crew from enemy bullets and fragments. Plus, the mobility of the scout allowed him, in which case, to simply break contact with the suddenly appeared enemy, that is, to put it simply, slip away
    Interestingly - it turns out that the doctrine of mobile war, based on various "auto tank", which "entered the topic" in recent years in the Middle East, and before that was used in a number of third world countries, was in use in the 40s? True, in the realities of serious battles and the presence of huge and fairly dense fronts, this probably did not become particularly relevant (although in North Africa, for example, light mobile forces were actively used by both sides, but there the specifics are different, often there were no dense front lines).
    1. +2
      23 December 2018 14: 40
      And without 500.000 American only trucks that solved the problem of Red Army mobility in 43-44
      - your table no longer pour bully
      a bit more 400 has been delivered. ALL cars, trucks account for about 350. In my opinion... hi
      1. +2
        23 December 2018 14: 51
        Quote: faiver
        a bit more 400 has been delivered. ALL cars

        Yeah, and yours too!)) Even it seemed that the quantity of the delivered one was disassembled in one of the topics of this cycle, it was itself in shock
  21. 0
    23 December 2018 19: 19
    Very interesting stuff. Especially close up photos. Thanks a lot to the author.
  22. +1
    24 December 2018 12: 45
    The USSR simply did not even have such trucks that could become the basis for the development of an armored personnel carrier. Only in 1944, the tests of the Soviet GAZ-63 began.

    To be precise, the USSR did not have serial all-wheel drive trucks. The experimental GAZ-63 was back in 1940, but before the war, mass production was not managed
    Moreover, the USSR also had a special chassis suitable for a scout-class vehicle - the LB-62. But, unfortunately, also not in time for the war.
  23. 0
    25 December 2018 20: 20
    Thank you for the article.
    Is anything known about deliveries of bridge spacers to the Valentain chassis, which was also delivered under Lend Lease?
    1. +2
      28 December 2018 06: 01
      25 units of this bridgelayer entered the USSR in 1944. You can see the car in the Patriot. In the Far East, there were two companies of 10 vehicles each. In general, this particular machine can be considered the basic one for the entire series of scissor bridges.
      Our film crew did not shoot the car in detail, but if it is interesting, the material will be prepared. Engineering cars in general are a special topic. Although, any car is a special topic ... if you look closely ...
      1. 0
        29 December 2018 08: 35
        Of course it’s interesting.
        The engineering equipment supplied by Lend-Lease for me is a dark forest.
        I read somewhere that the BREM M31 was posted. Recently, Sherman, a paravoz and KATOK tanks were raised from a sunken transport! The skating rinks turned out to be the same with Lend Lease. The topic is interesting and little studied. I wanted to know what else was posted on the land lease of the exotic.
        1. 0
          29 December 2018 09: 35
          laughing Or maybe it was a mine trawl for tanks?
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            29 December 2018 10: 29
            Austin-Western American company Cadet Roller rink lifted from a sunken transport Thomas Donaldson.