“Armatu”, it turns out, is waiting. With laser and railgun
Finally, we opened our eyes to simple truths, which for some reason did not open before. And the eyes did not open, and the truths were hidden by darkness. Maybe from a lack of education, and maybe from some unknown disease of these very eyes. Not so important, in principle, it is important that among the Russian media there are still rays of light in the dark kingdom.
And these rays will show us the true path and will not allow misunderstanding to drown in the darkness.
Let's start yelling, as expected, in order. It turns out that everything that our weapons designers are developing and introducing into production today is utter nonsense and old stuff!
By the way, the same applies to combat officers and generals who develop the tactics and strategy of modern combat. All their notions - the last century! Twentieth, and even with a stretch.
And in the yard like the century twenty-first, so we draw the appropriate conclusions. On the complete obsolescence of everything and everything.
Aircraft? Tanks? Assault rifles and other rifle weapon? Fighting machines? All last century. Something from the age of Pithecanthropus. Modern war will be a war of machines. And the soldiers will sit for a couple of thousand kilometers and move the “tanchiki” joystick.
Well, just like in the Ghoul and Ghoul aircraft.
And to us, the commanders said that the object is considered captured only after the nickel-chrome-vanadium testicles of the ordinary Seryoga Shishkin hang over the trench of the defenders.
Notice, not a tank will pass or the plane will fly, but a simple motorized infantry soldier will clear the enemy trench.
One feels that someone is outdated. Moral and thought.
Our insight came after reading the article in one fairly well-known edition. The author, undoubtedly owning the material, talks about why our new weapon systems today, even without putting them on the conveyor, must be sent to a landfill.
It turns out that we don’t need Armata tanks and vehicles based on them at all. And everything else, too. Billions of rubles in the furnace. New machines - in the furnace. New armored vehicles - in the furnace. New aircraft - there too. In the sense, something to melt down, and something just burn in the drawings as useless.
Today, very different ideas are fashionable.
Idea Robot-soldier, robot tank, robot plane taken from there. Modern warfare is a war of robots! But I wonder why those who are now fighting in various parts of the world, in various countries and in various armies do not know about this? Why weren't they told?
Why does a sniper with red eyes strain for days on positions? Wet, frozen, perhaps under the gun of an enemy sniper. Simply send the robot. Put a dozen cameras and one unit with a rifle. I saw - shot ...
After all, even invent nothing. Computers sea. Programs by which the robot will choose the target. - also. Self-propelled robots capable of shooting, invented and used for a long time. Put the sniper in a warm dugout away from the front line and let him fight with a joystick.
And for some reason he lies in the position ... Lies and terrifies the enemy with his accurate shots. Moreover, it destroys robotic opponents, whose “brain” is hundreds, thousands of times faster than human.
And the answer is given many decades ago! The human brain does not work the way even the most powerful computer works. The sniper does not analyze every blade of grass or every bush on the subject of determination. The sniper determines the location of the possible appearance of the enemy.
The number of operations per unit of time will never give an advantage to the machine. Man can not win. Of course, if it is a good professional. A person will always find an "antidote" from any car.
Another interesting point that we noticed is an atomic tank! Not in the sense of a tank firing nuclear weapons. Atomic engine tank! Imagine such a military phenomenon?
"And he goes to himself, goes ... And he doesn’t recognize your barking at all ..." Tank, which has such an installation that provides energy for any systems. This is a fortress, which is impossible to take.
And if there instead of a gun to put a railgun? That same electromagnetic gun? And not the first, also outdated version for a long time, and the second, promising. Shooting not projectiles, and electromagnetic pulses!
Babah - and all enemy high-precision weapons destroyed or struck. Depending on the distance, the brains are burned or the roof has gone.
And even better, and the films are more well-known thing, put laser weapons. Can you imagine the Peresvet laser on a tank?
The tank, and behind three "KamAZ" with electrical installation. Although, with a nuclear installation instead of an engine, why should a KamAZ tank? The reactor will give a hundred kilowatts, even without straining.
True, against the tanks, this thing does not trample. There anti-tank gun "from Pithecanthropists" need. Armor all the same. But on the aircraft may well be punched.
The story of what kind of weapon will be tomorrow, you can continue indefinitely. It's easier to watch any fantastic film about the conquest of humanity by aliens from a more developed planet. But why?
Why do we talk about what we would like to invent? And why does this new weapon begin its life from the fact that it is at war with the old?
We remember the most recent stories about the Soviet 60’s "obsolete" air defense missiles. About the ancient "Maxims" and ZSU-23-2. About retro mortars of the Second World War. We remember and see that it is precisely these weapons that are today one of the most formidable.
What is the deadliest weaponry today? Not in perspective, but in reality? We at one time gave an answer to this question. Mortars! Including "self-made". And that is typical, without a single e-rubbish.
Okay, not mortars. People. People who control all this metal armada interspersed with silicon and other electronics.
It is clear that the development of new weapons systems is necessary. Moreover, without this work there is no future for the Russian army. But why throw out what has already been achieved is not clear. Why do we have to abandon the "Almaty" and combat vehicles at its base? Just because it is expensive?
Weapons are generally expensive. Therefore, they invented the principle of necessary sufficiency. Do we need thousands of "Armat"? Not. Do we need thousands of Su-57? Also no. And not thousands? Looking for!
And then, who said (and in the TOI article about this is not a word) that robots and atomic tanks with loho ... excuse me, will the railguns be cheaper?
And in the end we will return to that very infantry Seryoga. Let's return to remind what was said at the beginning of the article. He, and only he takes the city, strong points. Frees civilians. Dies first and comes first winner.
That's about who we must first take care of ... He needs new infantry fighting vehicles, new tanks, a new machine gun, a new bulletproof vest.
And these rays will show us the true path and will not allow misunderstanding to drown in the darkness.
Let's start yelling, as expected, in order. It turns out that everything that our weapons designers are developing and introducing into production today is utter nonsense and old stuff!
By the way, the same applies to combat officers and generals who develop the tactics and strategy of modern combat. All their notions - the last century! Twentieth, and even with a stretch.
And in the yard like the century twenty-first, so we draw the appropriate conclusions. On the complete obsolescence of everything and everything.
Aircraft? Tanks? Assault rifles and other rifle weapon? Fighting machines? All last century. Something from the age of Pithecanthropus. Modern war will be a war of machines. And the soldiers will sit for a couple of thousand kilometers and move the “tanchiki” joystick.
Well, just like in the Ghoul and Ghoul aircraft.
And to us, the commanders said that the object is considered captured only after the nickel-chrome-vanadium testicles of the ordinary Seryoga Shishkin hang over the trench of the defenders.
Notice, not a tank will pass or the plane will fly, but a simple motorized infantry soldier will clear the enemy trench.
One feels that someone is outdated. Moral and thought.
Our insight came after reading the article in one fairly well-known edition. The author, undoubtedly owning the material, talks about why our new weapon systems today, even without putting them on the conveyor, must be sent to a landfill.
It turns out that we don’t need Armata tanks and vehicles based on them at all. And everything else, too. Billions of rubles in the furnace. New machines - in the furnace. New armored vehicles - in the furnace. New aircraft - there too. In the sense, something to melt down, and something just burn in the drawings as useless.
Today, very different ideas are fashionable.
Idea Robot-soldier, robot tank, robot plane taken from there. Modern warfare is a war of robots! But I wonder why those who are now fighting in various parts of the world, in various countries and in various armies do not know about this? Why weren't they told?
Why does a sniper with red eyes strain for days on positions? Wet, frozen, perhaps under the gun of an enemy sniper. Simply send the robot. Put a dozen cameras and one unit with a rifle. I saw - shot ...
After all, even invent nothing. Computers sea. Programs by which the robot will choose the target. - also. Self-propelled robots capable of shooting, invented and used for a long time. Put the sniper in a warm dugout away from the front line and let him fight with a joystick.
And for some reason he lies in the position ... Lies and terrifies the enemy with his accurate shots. Moreover, it destroys robotic opponents, whose “brain” is hundreds, thousands of times faster than human.
And the answer is given many decades ago! The human brain does not work the way even the most powerful computer works. The sniper does not analyze every blade of grass or every bush on the subject of determination. The sniper determines the location of the possible appearance of the enemy.
The number of operations per unit of time will never give an advantage to the machine. Man can not win. Of course, if it is a good professional. A person will always find an "antidote" from any car.
Another interesting point that we noticed is an atomic tank! Not in the sense of a tank firing nuclear weapons. Atomic engine tank! Imagine such a military phenomenon?
"And he goes to himself, goes ... And he doesn’t recognize your barking at all ..." Tank, which has such an installation that provides energy for any systems. This is a fortress, which is impossible to take.
And if there instead of a gun to put a railgun? That same electromagnetic gun? And not the first, also outdated version for a long time, and the second, promising. Shooting not projectiles, and electromagnetic pulses!
Babah - and all enemy high-precision weapons destroyed or struck. Depending on the distance, the brains are burned or the roof has gone.
And even better, and the films are more well-known thing, put laser weapons. Can you imagine the Peresvet laser on a tank?
The tank, and behind three "KamAZ" with electrical installation. Although, with a nuclear installation instead of an engine, why should a KamAZ tank? The reactor will give a hundred kilowatts, even without straining.
True, against the tanks, this thing does not trample. There anti-tank gun "from Pithecanthropists" need. Armor all the same. But on the aircraft may well be punched.
The story of what kind of weapon will be tomorrow, you can continue indefinitely. It's easier to watch any fantastic film about the conquest of humanity by aliens from a more developed planet. But why?
Why do we talk about what we would like to invent? And why does this new weapon begin its life from the fact that it is at war with the old?
We remember the most recent stories about the Soviet 60’s "obsolete" air defense missiles. About the ancient "Maxims" and ZSU-23-2. About retro mortars of the Second World War. We remember and see that it is precisely these weapons that are today one of the most formidable.
What is the deadliest weaponry today? Not in perspective, but in reality? We at one time gave an answer to this question. Mortars! Including "self-made". And that is typical, without a single e-rubbish.
Okay, not mortars. People. People who control all this metal armada interspersed with silicon and other electronics.
It is clear that the development of new weapons systems is necessary. Moreover, without this work there is no future for the Russian army. But why throw out what has already been achieved is not clear. Why do we have to abandon the "Almaty" and combat vehicles at its base? Just because it is expensive?
Weapons are generally expensive. Therefore, they invented the principle of necessary sufficiency. Do we need thousands of "Armat"? Not. Do we need thousands of Su-57? Also no. And not thousands? Looking for!
And then, who said (and in the TOI article about this is not a word) that robots and atomic tanks with loho ... excuse me, will the railguns be cheaper?
And in the end we will return to that very infantry Seryoga. Let's return to remind what was said at the beginning of the article. He, and only he takes the city, strong points. Frees civilians. Dies first and comes first winner.
That's about who we must first take care of ... He needs new infantry fighting vehicles, new tanks, a new machine gun, a new bulletproof vest.
Information