A drone for "Tornado". Reconnaissance complex completes testing

39
Projectiles multiple launch rocket systems of large calibers can carry combat units of various types, as well as special equipment. Currently, a new project of such a product with special equipment is being created in our country. A prospective missile instead of a warhead or combat elements must be carried by reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicle. Recently it became known that the process of creating such an intelligence complex is nearing completion. A new projectile for the MLRS "Smerch" completes the test and will soon be ready for service.

It must be recalled that the idea of ​​using a UAV as a missile payload is not new. Such proposals appeared a long time ago, and already in the late nineties, real samples of this kind began to appear at domestic exhibitions. However, not all missile projects with drones on board were able to reach full implementation.



New posts

The current project promising missiles with non-standard equipment was first reported at the end of January 2017. Then the leadership of the Splav Research and Production Association told about the new development. Nikolai Makarovets, General Designer of the enterprise, told the Russian press about the development of a UAV placed in the Smerch 300-mm rocket. It was noted that the idea of ​​such a system appeared quite a long time ago. By that time, part of the necessary work was carried out, with the result that Splav was in anticipation of potential customers.


Fighting vehicle MLRS "Smerch". Photo of Wikimedia Commons


Last year, some principles of the operation of the new complex were announced. The missile must deliver the drone to a given area, after which it is dropped and begins to solve its own problems. A UAV is able to stay in the air for 25-30 minutes and monitor. The signal from the camera of the device must be transmitted to the operator's console. A UAV with such functions is proposed to be used to conduct reconnaissance, adjust fire and monitor the results of shooting.

For one reason or another, the project of a missile with a UAV from NPO Splav for a long time disappeared from view. New progress reports appeared only in March of this year. This time, the project was told by the management of the concern "Tehmash", which includes the organization-developer. It was alleged that the Russian Ministry of Defense got acquainted with the draft of the new missile, but did not show proper interest in it. At the same time, the original ideas attracted the attention of the Chinese military.

The following messages, also of interest, appeared at the end of September. Then it became known that the project of a rocket with a drone on board passed into the stage of flight tests of prototypes. According to Tehmash, a new project is being developed at NPO Splav together with a certain unnamed foreign customer. The latter presented his technical task to which the finished product should correspond. It did not clarify what kind of foreign country showed interest in the new Russian project and can now become a starting customer for equipment.

On November 27, the latest news on the progress of the new project, NPO Splav, appeared. The press service of the concern "Tehmash" reported that work on the creation of promising products are in the final stages. However, the exact timing of the end of testing and refinement, as well as the start of production and transfer of products to the customer has not yet been named. Also, the starting customer in the person of a certain foreign country, which had previously submitted its own requirements for the project, was not specified.

Shortly after News On the completion of the project, the Zvezda television and radio company published a photograph of a promising UAV proposed for use with the Smerch MLRS. The T90 drone was present in the picture, quite familiar to specialists and amateurs of military equipment. It followed that the project, the materials on which regularly appeared at various exhibitions, finally got a chance to get to operation.

Product T90

Recall, the idea of ​​building a special rocket caliber 300 mm, carrying an unmanned aerial vehicle, appeared in the distant past, and to date has been proposed several options for its practical implementation. Back in the nineties, NPO Splav developed the 9М534 rocket projectile with a cargo hold instead of a full-time combat compartment. Later it was proposed several options for picking such a rocket using one or another UAV.


T90 UAV in transport position, front view. Photo Rbase.new-factoria.ru


In the same period, Kazan enterprise “Enix” for the first time showed a small-sized drone called Т90. In the future, this product was being finalized, but its main features remained unchanged. The T90 project provided for the construction of an average aircraft mass, characterized by small dimensions in the transport position. This problem was solved with the help of folding planes of a special construction. The UAV was performed disposable, it was intended for conducting visual reconnaissance in a given area to ensure one or another combat work.

The product T90 had a cylindrical fuselage of high elongation with modified nose and tail parts. Glazing was provided on the bottom of the nose for the camera to work. The device received an unusual plane. Near the nose and tail, the designers placed two pairs of planes unfolded in flight. In the transport position, the elements of the wings were stacked along the fuselage. There were also two ventral keels.

A pulsating jet engine was used as a power plant on the T90. This device was mounted on the top of the fuselage. According to known data, communications and remote control equipment was installed on board the UAV, as well as a video camera for observations during the flight. The control system has been implemented the possibility of autonomous navigation with the correction of the operator commands.

The 9М534 projectile most closely resembled standard ammunition for the Smerch MLRS. It had a length of 7,6 m with a starting mass of 815 kg. The new warhead, containing the drone, had a length of more than 2 m and weight 243 kg. In this case, the UAV itself accounted for only 40 kg. According to past data, the 9М534 projectile could deliver a payload from 25 to 90 km. The 90 could patrol at 500 m for 20 minutes. The maximum flight speed is 100 km / h. The on-board radio equipment provided video signal transmission to the operator from ranges up to 70 km.

The drone Т90 should be sent to the specified area using a jet projectile carrier. At this point, the payload is reset, and the UAV leaves the carrier with a parachute. During descent, the device opens the plane, drops the parachute, goes into horizontal flight and establishes communication with the operator. After that, he can perform the tasks.

The payload of the T90 UAV included a pair of cameras for surveillance at any time of the day. The video signal and telemetry data over the radio channel are transmitted to the operator’s console. The possibility of conducting observation at a considerable distance allowed the complex to solve various problems. With the help of a special projectile with a drone, it was proposed to conduct reconnaissance and search for targets during preparation for a massive strike of rocket artillery. During firing, the T90 could work as a spotter. Also with his help it was proposed to control the results of the shooting. The flight duration at 25-30 minutes allowed one to take part in one or two strokes of the MLRS battery.


UAV in flight configuration. Photo Rbase.new-factoria.ru


A characteristic feature of the complex in the 9М534 and Т90 products was the impossibility of their reuse. So, the drone after the production of fuel had to fall to the ground. His return to the launcher was not envisaged for technical and tactical reasons.

Combat engagement

The 300-mm 9М534 projectile with the T90 drone is intended for use as part of the Smerch MLRS and has the appropriate characteristics. Apparently, the creation of this complex took into account all the main features of military equipment and the possible requirements of the armed forces.

Most of the shells for Smerch have a firing range of up to 70 km, and are also equipped with correction tools that increase accuracy. The T90 UAV is capable of transmitting data from similar distances. Thus, reconnaissance drone can ensure the operation of multiple launch rocket systems for solving all the main tasks in all ranges, up to the maximum.

The task of the reconnaissance complex based on the UAV is to determine the exact coordinates of the target, as well as to control the penetration of missiles. The presence of the aircraft, patrolling over the target, allows you to monitor the results of shooting in real time and make timely amendments to the tip, increasing the efficiency of fire.

Pros, cons and interest of customers

According to recent news, the Russian project of a projectile with an UAV interested only the foreign military, while our army does not intend to purchase such products. The management of NPO "Splav" explained this. The fact is that the structure of the Russian army has already identified structures responsible for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles. In other words, reconnaissance using UAVs is assigned to specific units and units. The introduction of their own unmanned reconnaissance as part of rocket artillery in this case was considered unnecessary.

In addition, the new intelligence complex could find flaws. First of all, the reason for criticism may be the impossibility of re-using the T90 drone and its launch vehicle. Other UAVs with similar functions can be used repeatedly. In addition, the compact unit has limited flight performance. Other drones are not limited by the size of the missile warhead, and therefore can fly faster, farther and higher, and also carry a different payload.


"Tornado" in a firing position. Photo by Vitalykuzmin.net


All of this means that the Russian marines, at least in the foreseeable future, will not be able to use drones of the type T90. However, rocket artillery will not remain without the support of reconnaissance aircraft. Our army has a large number of different types of UAVs, and the interaction of such equipment with artillery was repeatedly worked out at exercises. Thus, the army has the necessary means and without the products 9М534 and Т90.

It is obvious that the military of other countries are not obliged to share the opinion of the Russian command. The result is interest in the project from China. The Chinese army is also developing an unmanned direction and is also armed with various intelligence systems of this kind. Nevertheless, she considered that the UAV for the MLRS is of interest and can be entered into service. The result was a collaboration between a foreign customer and a Russian research and production organization.

Preliminary results

Recently it became known that NPO Splav continues flight tests of a new reconnaissance complex designed for work with multiple launch rocket systems, and this part of the project is nearing completion. In the foreseeable future, the appearance of a contract for the supply of serial products is expected. The starting customer will be a certain foreign country, which, apparently, will be China. The volumes of potential supplies and the cost of the future contract, for obvious reasons, remain unknown.

In the context of the rearmament of the Russian army, the situation with the Т90 project does not change. As in the past, our command is not going to supplement the existing MLRS with a specialized intelligence complex, relying on other systems of this kind. In the light of the difference in tactical and technical characteristics, such an approach looks logical and correct, since it allows one to solve assigned tasks without encountering the well-known limitations of the Т90 product.

Thus, a very interesting situation is emerging. The Russian defense industry has once again demonstrated its ability to create various types of weapons and equipment, including fundamentally new ones. At the same time, a new sample of an unusual type turned out to be unnecessary for the Russian army due to the presence of other analogs, but interested foreign customers. Russian development is entering the international market and has every chance to gain a foothold on it. According to the latest news, the T90 UAV completes the tests, and in the near future we should expect new reports about its fate.

On the materials of the sites:
http://tass.ru/
http://rg.ru/
http://tvzvezda.ru/
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/
http://bastion-karpenko.ru/
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    28 November 2018 06: 30
    For 20 years they have been trying to bring it to mind, probably tired of waiting.
    1. +2
      28 November 2018 07: 51
      But isn’t it easier to introduce a car with ordinary UAVs of the required range into the battery?
      1. 0
        28 November 2018 13: 35
        The fact is that the structure of the Russian army has already identified structures responsible for the use of unmanned aerial vehicles. In other words, reconnaissance using UAVs is assigned to specific units and units.

        The fact is that in the Russian army everything is done through the ass and it does not know how and is not going to master modern methods of warfare !!! In the comments and in the article, such a dense primitivism and narrow-mindedness is voiced that words are simply not enough from indignation ... time ... The most interesting thing is that there are such channels in MLRS and ACS, and they should receive information from the non-working ESU system TK "Constellation - M" .... and similar ones, which should have long been introduced, in accordance with the program the creation of new weapons by Putin, which began in 2000 and should be completed in 2020 ... Lies and lies are everywhere, nothing has been done, they are not ready for war, as the primitive operation in Syria showed ... Glory to the General Staff and his great reformer and clever to the head-stupid V.V. Gerasimov and Co. ...
        1. 0
          28 November 2018 23: 56
          I would like to supplement with Putin's statement after the election: "The planned reduction in defense spending for 2018-2019 will not lead to a decrease in the defense capability of the Russian Federation, since the main costs for creating the latest systems are already behind. This was stated by Russian President Vladimir Putin."
          So you do not have to wait for anything new. The equipment of the purchased equipment speaks eloquently about this.
          1. -2
            3 February 2019 10: 19
            For the latest weapons, Russia left the United States behind for 80-90 years !! Over the past 10 years, Putin has developed and put into service dozens of types of the latest pages of new-generation missiles and dozens of tests, backward United States have not even developed one over the past 40 years, while 60-year-old missiles in service have long since decayed from their old age and are not combat-ready. to everyone!
      2. 0
        6 February 2019 10: 15
        Quote: Zaurbek
        But isn’t it easier to introduce a car with ordinary UAVs of the required range into the battery?

        ==========
        Well, that’s what our people apparently did !!!
        There is another question: this very T90 - reaches the target much faster than traditional UAVs (there seems to be a supersonic projectile speed)! So, on approach, you can shoot it down only with the help of air defense systems (and even then - not every one)! Well or the edge - with the help of multi-barrel ZAK ...
    2. -1
      3 February 2019 10: 16
      Yes, in the production of UAVs, Russia is ahead of the rest, Russia is the only country in the world that has armament drums of the 6th generation, Americans still have only 3-4, and Israel has 1-2 generations. And the tornado also surpasses all world analogues by 50-60 years, the Americans also do not sleep and plan to create something similar by 2080 !!
  2. +1
    28 November 2018 07: 54
    What kind of country do we have?
    The product is still at the prototype stage, and its performance characteristics are already known to the whole world. And if only a drone, this applies to almost all new developments. We successfully provide both China and all potential competitors with free ideas in the field of advanced developments.
    And it would be necessary - first in the series and in the troops, and only then the intelligence of competitors let him guess what kind of Russian crap this is.
    1. +1
      6 February 2019 10: 34
      Quote: prior
      What kind of country do we have? The product is still at the prototype stage, and its performance characteristics are already known to the whole world.

      ===========
      Well, firstly, in this case we are talking about a "product for foreign customer "!!! So you can consider this element of" promoting the world arms market ".....
      And secondly: in the second half of the 70s of the last century, your humble servant got to the "training camp", where, among other things, they studied the "new items" of NATO weapons, incl. and the F-16 (which had just completed the tests and was preparing for delivery to the troops) .... Then I was terribly surprised that the performance characteristics (and not only performance characteristics, but also the appearance "without plating" - that is, a full view machine "anatomy") got into the open press !!! I asked the instructor about this. Do you know WHAT he answered me ?: "And where did you get the idea that the PUBLISHED data CORRESPOND to reality, and not" misleading "??? Well," anatomy "is the same! Besides, the MAIN thing here is the same! In addition, the main thing is not the "anatomy" of the aircraft, but the parameters of the onboard electronics, construction materials, etc., etc. ... But these data are just classified!
      Here - somewhere like that!
      1. 0
        6 February 2019 10: 44
        I agree with your arguments. But if you remember in the USSR even the appearance of the developed products, planes, for example, was secret. Ideas, technologies are not the last meaning.
        Know our "partners" more precisely that we are developing hypersound, with their financial, technological, intelligence and scientific capabilities, where would we be now?
  3. +5
    28 November 2018 09: 24
    Recently, there was talk about new MLRS systems to combat air defense. There the principle is this. A drone is launched for reconnaissance and target designation, and then a MLRS package flies with detached, unobtrusive gliding high-precision bombs. For such purposes, an unmanned aerial vehicle with a MLRS missile delivery is necessary. An ordinary drone still needs to fly to the reconnaissance area. And here the drone with delivery on an MLRS rocket has a much greater chance of receiving information.
    So either our MO is deeply wrong or is encrypted under the fool.
    1. Kaw
      0
      11 January 2019 20: 42
      The world has already begun the era of barrage of ammunition, there and reconnaissance and striking in one bottle. Why not make a drone out of it.
      1. 0
        6 February 2019 10: 41
        Quote: Kaw
        The world has already begun the era of barrage of ammunition, there and reconnaissance and striking in one bottle. Why not make a drone out of it.

        ==============
        Well, WHY, actually the T90 cannot serve as a prototype for such weapons ?? And who says that such work is NOT WENT ???
  4. +5
    28 November 2018 12: 09
    It seems to me that the disinterest of our MO in such a UAV lies in the following. The essence of the use of MLRS in the following is to deliver the most powerful blow and then change the position as quickly as possible. Now imagine the task - to destroy the enemy motorized infantry (say battalion) in the area of ​​concentration. The enemy has counter-battery means (which you will agree is very common now). The battery (now the most likely outfit of forces allocated for a strike) takes a position and prepares for a strike. The commander launches RS with UAVs for additional reconnaissance. The PC leaves the rail and after a short time is detected by the counter-battery of the enemy. Those. The UAV has not yet completed its task, and the coordinates of the battery are already known to the enemy. There are still chances to strike, but no change of position. Conclusion. It is better to use a conventional UAV and launched from a source that does not have a binding to the location of the battery.
    It can be argued that a BM launching a rocket from a UAV may be far from the main battery power, but then this will reduce the density of fire on the battery on this BM, or increase the complexity of battery control, if you use a "reconnaissance" BM from the position from which the launch was made and from big risk of losing this BM. Again, whatever one may say, losses cannot be avoided and the use of conventional UAVs is more expedient.
    These are the pies with kittens, and you say that our generals are "stupid."
    Although you can come up with such a UAV and another application - for example, when the battery is charged with the main task of setting the EW curtain in a certain area. But this is a different story and UAVs are not needed for reconnaissance.
    1. +1
      28 November 2018 13: 57
      I think the element of surprise and short-term fire raid MLRS here has a key role.

      A UAV rigidly attached to a given salvo does not have to send a "picture" to the fire control point.
    2. +2
      28 November 2018 18: 28
      I absolutely agree with you, especially since the UAV can be launched from anywhere, but the operator, who is also a spotter, can be located directly on the battery
      1. +1
        28 November 2018 18: 32
        Quote: spec.78
        I absolutely agree with you, especially since the UAV can be launched from anywhere, but the operator, who is also a spotter, can be located directly on the battery

        With modern automated control systems, the operator can be located anywhere, including and on the battery ... But from the point of view of convenience, it is more logical for him to be at his unit
    3. 0
      28 November 2018 22: 01
      You can launch an UAV during a volley to assess the damage caused and to correct subsequent volleys, in addition, this is the essence of a planning projectile and in such a hypostasis it can also be used in theory.
  5. +4
    28 November 2018 14: 38
    The 90M9 missile launched by the T534 has the advantage that it can be at the right point in space very quickly, i.e. at the right moment. Another UAV is not capable of this ... This is the T90's critical advantage. The only drawback is the short range, about 70 km - communication restrictions. This disadvantage can be eliminated by another UAV - a repeater, probably a helicopter type, rising in the region of the RZSO. The task is to throw the T90 at a range of up to 250 km and conduct reconnaissance from there. And the T90 itself can also be returned if it gives its landing coordinates, then the postal UAV will be able to pick it up later.
    1. +1
      28 November 2018 22: 31
      The new warhead containing the drone had a length of more than 2 m and a mass of 243 kg. At the same time, the UAV itself accounted for only 40 kg.

      In theory, a heavier specimen can be created with higher characteristics.
  6. +6
    28 November 2018 18: 42
    What nonsense write out. The essence of this UAV is to clarify the result of the strike. The rocket goes with him in a salvo. The rest fall to the ground, explode, inflict damage on the enemy fortifications and equipment. And the UAV hangs quietly and looks down at the AD created on the ground. Allows you to clarify the actual result of the volley. Hit / missed. Maybe supplements need to be requested from an adjacent battery. Maybe the target was false and as a result of the defeat, inflatable tanks and mannequins from the nearest megamall appeared, and the real forces of the enemy should be continued to be sought.
    1. 0
      29 November 2018 02: 55
      It remains the main thing, who will give you the coordinates of the enemy fortifications and equipment ... There are no fortifications, only the terrorists have left, but the technology has left ... If reconnaissance and target designation and the transfer of target coordinates does not go in real time, then in a modern war, defeat is immediately ... We have only one option - these are death row spotters or scouts with a radio station who transmit the coordinates of the enemy, being in combat contact with him and most likely posthumously ... This is not even yesterday, but the day before yesterday with a mountain of corpses .... And also consider the time of prin There are solutions in our outdated structures .... In this regard, our army is a dinosaur ...
      1. +1
        29 November 2018 10: 45
        Reconnaissance is in charge of issuing coordinates for the strike. More precisely, the troops request a strike at the given coordinates. And who there is engaged in reconnaissance to MLRS has nothing to do. There can be: satellite, plane, Stirlitz, reconnaissance group, UAV, "Zoo, etc., etc. There are many sources of information. The tornado must be worked out according to coordinates and make sure that the target is hit. That's what an unmanned rocket is for.
        Its size and functionality simply will not allow for full intelligence. The flight time is short, only the camera is a means of detection.
  7. +1
    28 November 2018 22: 16
    Screw 250 grams of cc to this device and give the opportunity to relay the signal to others the same and get an almost instantly deployed swarm network of shock drones.
    A similar swarm will already be able to cause significant damage not only to concentrated but also to dispersed troops (unlike conventional tornado missiles). Advantage over corrected shells of the same tornado: launcher can leave immediately, has no restrictions on dispersion of targets, significantly longer range (70 km + 0.4 * 100 = 110km). The disadvantage is a small charge of centuries.
    The current model, however, has only one camera, but having received a second camera in the back hemisphere and an infrared emitter, such a network will already be practically immune to electronic warfare.
    1. 0
      29 November 2018 01: 23
      If you still think of why. Then it will be very good.
      1. 0
        3 December 2018 02: 09
        In order to destroy dispersed columns with enemy reinforcements on the march, for example. How reinforcements from the Nagorno-Karabakh armed forces were destroyed during the last exacerbation of their conflict, as a result of which the Armenians lost their territory for the first time.
    2. 0
      30 November 2018 10: 49
      Quote: Newone
      Screw 250 grams of centuries to this device

      Quote: Newone
      The advantage over the corrected shells of the same tornado: the launcher can leave the position immediately, has no restrictions on the dispersion of targets, a significantly longer range (70 km + 0.4 * 100 = 110 km).
      Offer to reduce the warhead by 1000 times, cool. And what prevents the tornado from leaving the position immediately after the launch of conventional corrected shells?
      1. 0
        3 December 2018 02: 44
        The absence thereof (with the exception of 9M542 for a foreign customer whose characteristics are not known). Those. in a concentrated column of equipment on the march, the Tornado will fall (if everything goes well) due to the large area of ​​destruction (and homing submunitions). But if the enemy travels dispersed, with large intervals between vehicles, then nothing will come of it.
        If we argue, then the "conventional corrected" ammunition, used with correction in real time, requires an individual spotter. Accordingly, if there is only one spotter, then the MLRS will not be able to shoot with a packet, and an increase in the number of non-simultaneous launches is an increased probability of getting a response. Roy fired and left.
        1. 0
          3 December 2018 13: 39
          A dispersed column is no longer a group goal. Nobody will shoot at it from the RSZO.
          1. 0
            3 December 2018 15: 12
            The existing ammunition "SMERCHA" will not be because it is ineffective. Drones are ALREADY used for similar purposes. If MLRS is used as a platform for delivering drones, then why not?
            1. 0
              3 December 2018 17: 50
              The essence of the drone is largely in the cheapness. Can you imagine how much a tornado volley costs? This one, two how to ensure the guidance of the mass of drones at a distance of 100+ kilometers? A division of gunners behind enemy lines ,? Or put strong transmitters on the drones themselves? Include EW and Khan volley. For those purposes that you describe, the optimal large strike UAV with guided bombs on board is optimal. And his energy is higher and the connection on it is stronger and more resistant to electronic warfare.
              1. 0
                3 December 2018 22: 57
                1) The essence of the kamikaze drone, from my point of view, is that it can independently carry out additional reconnaissance, guidance and destruction of the target, i.e. its combat effectiveness is close to 100% and only the enemy’s air defense is cut. At the same time, cheapness makes it economically disadvantageous to use complex long-range air defense systems that limit the use of aviation, for example.
                2) that is why the salvo system and swarm use are proposed. Each drone in a swarm repeater for the rest. I have already suggested that the use of two cameras and emitters compatible with them (IR or optical range) allows such a swarm to get a communication system with an operator that is practically immune to electronic warfare equipment. Stretch the chain of drones to the operator, where the distance between the drones is determined by the resistance to electronic warfare. Dubbing such chains. You get a system resistant to electronic warfare and air defense.
                3) A swarm of drones is his own gunner - this is the point. Shot in a square and then within 20 minutes, search for the target, then guidance and destruction. From means of external target designation, only an indication is required that the target is valid in a given square
                4) A large impact UAV is a convenient target for air defense and electronic warfare directional countermeasures. Dimensions, cost, number of such devices.
                1. 0
                  4 December 2018 00: 46
                  That is, do you think that a swarm of drones will be able to circle the target for 20 minutes and no one will notice it and will not react? The concept of the swarm itself is complex and its huge minus in vulnerability to the electronic warfare. The more elements in the swarm it is easier to break into their network and make confusion.
                  1. 0
                    4 December 2018 14: 45
                    "its huge disadvantage is its vulnerability for electronic warfare equipment" - for a network of drones controlled by radio, you are probably right. However, there are already opportunities for organizing high-capacity communication channels using infrared and / or optical bands, rather than radio (moreover, similar domestic commercial systems have already been created and offered to the market). Systems built using such communication and control channels to electronic warfare facilities are stable. The device considered in the article already has the most complex part of such a system - an optical receiver. Mass use will provide redundancy for control communication channels.
                    1. 0
                      4 December 2018 18: 36
                      What is the range of such a connection?
                      1. 0
                        5 December 2018 01: 21
                        A few kilometers. Therefore, a chain of drones is needed.
  8. 0
    29 November 2018 01: 44
    It seemed like there was a discussion of this UAV, though Damantsev was there, but I really did not see anything new ... well, if you read the article and comments ...


    https://topwar.ru/84515-prover-takticheskie-preimuschestva-giperzvukovogo-drona-dlya-smercha.html

    laughing soldier
  9. Kaw
    0
    11 January 2019 20: 34
    In the 90s, that would be cool. And now it looks pretty ridiculous, a one-time UAV that can fly only 90 km, work no more than 20 minutes, inferior in its characteristics to the banal Orlan and probably more expensive.
    IMHO from this development it is worth making barrage ammunition. Analogue of Spike, only with a range of 90 km. But if you develop it for more than 10 years, you can not even start, it will become obsolete earlier.
  10. M_5
    0
    5 October 2022 00: 19
    Isn't it easier to make a cheap cruise missile with a PuVRD and a television seeker?