The composition of the submarine fleets of the United States, Russia, China and the EU in graphs

40
Submarines of the Russian Navy





Many people who are not indifferent to issues related to the activities of the Naval Analyses organization have already heard fleet. Its experts analyze both the issues of modern naval forces and everything related to ships of the past. Perhaps one of the most interesting graphs created by Naval Analyses was the infographic showing the composition of the submarine forces of the modern Russian Navy. We are talking about both nuclear and diesel-electric submarines (as you know, unlike the United States, Russia combines two types of power plants in the submarine fleet). On the graph you can see the strategic missile submarines (SSBNs), nuclear submarines with cruise missiles (SSGN), multipurpose nuclear submarines, as well as special submarines.

Naval Analyzers can forgive some controversial points and inaccuracies. For example, the fact that they introduced the Prince Vladimir, a nuclear submarine of the 955 "Borey" strategic submarine, which in reality will be part of the fleet no earlier than 2019. According to reports, the boat is now undergoing factory and state tests. The same can be said for the newest multi-purpose boat K-561 "Kazan" of the project 885 "Ash". A submarine may be incorporated into the fleet in the 2019 year. On the whole, the graph clearly shows that the Russian submarine fleet takes the second place in the world in terms of overall potential. Immediately after the submarine forces of the United States.

US Navy Submarines



By itself, they could not bypass the US Navy in Naval Analyses, and one of the works shows all the submarines that are available to the American fleet. On the graph you can see the basis of the US nuclear triad - strategic Ohio-type submarines. In the SSBN version, each of them carries Trident II D24 ballistic missiles onboard the 5. The Ohio-type submarine even now can be called the most destructive ship in stories. It is worth noting, however, that some of these submarines were reequipped as carriers of cruise missiles, thus moving into the SSGN level.

However, fans of the US Navy are probably more interested in the numerical strength of the latest fourth-generation multipurpose submarines. We are talking about "Virginia" and "Sivulf." And if the last Americans have built only three pieces, the "Virginia" the United States intends to produce a large batch of ships in 30. Thus, the total potential of the US submarine fleet will be at a very high level even after the final withdrawal of Los Angeles-type multipurpose submarines from the fleet. The latter, by the way, for all the time produced 62 units.

Submarines of the Chinese Navy



Many, perhaps the most interesting work in the series will seem like a graph showing the composition of the submarine fleet of the PRC. This is not surprising, considering how rarely information about Chinese submarines is presented in the Russian-language media. In the foreseeable future, the Middle Kingdom has aimed at having a naval force that will occupy at least the second place in the world in terms of aggregate potential. It must be assumed that this also applies to nuclear-powered submarines with ballistic missiles.

At the same time, it is now that the submarine forces of China look rather strange than threatening. This is due, among other things, to too much noticeable borrowing from the Soviet Union / Russia. For example, the Jin 094 SSBN is difficult to visually distinguish from the traditional Soviet missile carrier of the 667BDRM Dolphin project. According to reports, 094-type submarines carry 12 Xyulan-2 (JL-2) ballistic missiles with a range of up to 12 thousand km. These missiles are considered an underwater version of the Chinese land-based strategic missiles DF-31.

The strategic submarines of the 092 "Xia" project, also shown on the graph, are very outdated, but China continues to exploit them. It should be noted that promising strategic submarines of the 096 "Tang" project are designed to strengthen the maritime component of the PRC nuclear triad. Each of them, according to available data, will carry 24 ballistic missiles, which can only be compared with the already mentioned American submarines of the Ohio type. Although China is unlikely to have missiles with the characteristics of the Trident II D5.

Submarines of the European Union



Even more complicated is the situation with the composition of the submarine fleets of the EU countries. Suffice it to say that now it formally includes submarines of Great Britain, but this is for now. The country is expected to leave the European Union 29 March 2019. In general, the British fleet is often faced with serious difficulties. In 2017, it was reported that all the latest British multi-purpose Astyut-class submarines had failed. The source also spoke about the problems with the “predecessors” of these boats - the “Trafalgards”.

Apart from the UK, France has the most powerful underwater forces in Europe. Recall, the latter has in its composition four missile strategic submarine cruisers "Triumfan". As for multi-purpose boats, here the Fifth Republic boasts six nuclear submarines “Ryubi” built in 1976 — 1993. It is worth noting that the class of submarines "Ruby" are the smallest nuclear submarines in service in the world. Each of them has an underwater displacement in 2607 tons.

The German submarine fleet is looking pale against the background of the British and French, although during the Second World War the German submariners instilled horror in the hearts of experienced American and British sailors. Modern Germany has no nuclear submarines at all, and there are only six diesel-electric submarines at the disposal of Deutseche Marine. However, this is a very modern submarines project XNUMHA, which are interested in a number of foreign customers.

Italy also boasts a fairly powerful fleet of diesel-electric submarines.

A very numerous submarine fleet, as follows from the schedule, have the Greek Navy.

It should be noted that the graphs presented by us are far from the only ones created by Naval Analyses. By visiting the organization’s website, you can, in particular, familiarize yourself with the size of the fleets of Latin American countries, the surface potential of EU countries and many other interesting facts concerning modern (and not only) fleets of the world.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mvg
    +2
    30 July 2018 09: 05
    What is the article about? Or am I missing a couple of paragraphs?
  2. -2
    30 July 2018 09: 06
    Everything about defense is very worrying. But this article pleased me, of course, if all of our boats are in combat condition.
  3. +4
    30 July 2018 09: 07
    France has the most powerful submarine forces in Europe ....

    hi ..After more than 10 years of research in the DCNS design department, a program was developed for four new-generation submarines of the Le Triomphant class. The last of them, Le Terrible, was transferred to the French fleet in 2010 ..
  4. +7
    30 July 2018 11: 20
    The situation is deplorable, in order to maintain second place in the Russian submarine, it is necessary to increase the submarine fleet in the first order, taking into account the worthlessness of large surface ships in the specific conditions of the Russian Federation, and the auxiliary functions of the surface fleet as such, the submarine is the base of the fleet, the most important part of the nuclear triad, the only long arm Moscow, give up all efforts to build submarines of all kinds, the development of new projects
    1. 0
      6 August 2018 17: 34
      It is well said that drones at the bottom of the Mariana Trench and other depths are what we should strive for, this will give a guarantee of a retaliatory strike, not a single defeat system can reach it.
  5. 0
    30 July 2018 12: 52
    Although such a certainty.
    Under Yeltsin, there were less than a dozen nuclear submarines. Now the situation is getting better. And this is good.
    1. +13
      30 July 2018 14: 57
      Quote: atakan
      Under Yeltsin, nuclear submarines remained less than a dozen

      wassat Andrey, you are more than wrong. Under Yeltsin, we had a powerful (numerically) submarine fleet anchored and gradually leaving under the knife. Under Putin, we continued a landslide reduction in the fleet, and the number of subfloors has long fallen below the plinth, and continues to decline. Worse, it will continue to decline, since the arrival of new submarines does not nearly compensate for the retirement of old
      Under Putin, we completed as many as 3 multipurpose nuclear submarines - Nerpa, Cheetah (Shchuki-B) and Severodvinsk, and the Nerpa was given to the Indians. For 18 years.
      1. +1
        30 July 2018 15: 22
        But under Yeltsin, the fleet really only went under the knife. Old too than bad to finish. The number will definitely decline. Even so, 20 years did not really build anything
        1. +6
          30 July 2018 15: 30
          Quote: igorbrsv
          But under Yeltsin, the fleet really only went under the knife. Old too than bad to finish

          The old ones were also completed under Yeltsin. With him, 6 Shchuka-B boats, 1 boats of the 945A Condor project, 5 boats of the 949Antei project were put into operation, and, which is typical, all this was put into operation for 10 years, and not for 18 (and can I still forgot something, by the way)
      2. +7
        30 July 2018 17: 35
        Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
        Under Putin, we completed as many as 3 multipurpose nuclear submarines - Nerpa, Cheetah (Shchuki-B) and Severodvinsk, and the Nerpa was given to the Indians. For 18 years.

        We do not consider Boreas.
        Andrey, distort!
        1. +3
          30 July 2018 17: 47
          Quote: konstantin68
          We do not consider Boreas.

          Of course not. This is not the MAPL, but the SSBN, and without the cover of the MAPL, they are helpless
          1. +3
            30 July 2018 17: 49
            But the conversation was about the submarine, in general, without separation according to military mission.
            But what about 885?
            1. +9
              30 July 2018 18: 38
              Quote: konstantin68
              But the conversation was about the submarine, in general, without separation according to military mission.

              OK, if you like, then please. PR Yeltsin was put into operation in less than 10 years 1 Pike, 6 boats "Pike-B", 1 boats of the project 945A "Condor", 5 boats of the project 949A "Antey", and all - 13 nuclear submarines
              Under Putin, for 18 years - 3 MAPL (Nerpa, Cheetah, Serevrodvinsk) and 3 SSBN Borey is only six, given the fact that Nerpa went to the Indians, the fleet received 5
              Quote: konstantin68
              But what about 885?

              No way - by the time all 7 boats go into operation, the fleet will lose much more of them
              1. +2
                30 July 2018 20: 13
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                Under Putin for 18 years

                And how much was laid under Putin?
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                No way - by the time all 7 boats go into operation, the fleet will lose much more of them
              2. +4
                30 July 2018 20: 17
                Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                OK, if you like, then please.

                Don't write about 636 either. Not a nuclear submarine, but still. And not only them.
                1. +9
                  30 July 2018 20: 50
                  Quote: konstantin68
                  And how much was laid under Putin?

                  What else would you think up to somehow shield Putin? :))))
                  Under Yeltsin, the 7 submarine of the Pike B type, the 4 submarine of the 949A project, one Severodvinsk and one Borey, and all in all the 13 nuclear submarine, were laid down. For 10 years.
                  Of the 7 submarines of the Pike type B, Putin sold one to India, and three - cannibalized for the completion of other submarines, so that the fleet was replenished only with 3 “Pike-B” of which 2 went into operation under Yeltsin.
                  Of the 4 submarines of the 949A project, one was put into operation under Yeltsin, one is being completed on a special project (Belgorod), the other two were dismantled by Putin on a slipway.
                  Severodvinsk and Borey completed under Putin.
                  That is, from the 13 nuclear submarines that were laid down by the predecessor, Putin destroyed the 5, and sold one. At the same time, under Putin, 6 submarines of the Ash type and 7 submarines of the Borey type - that is, 13 units - were laid down. True, not for 10 years, but for 18, but who counts them for you? laughing
                  Quote: konstantin68
                  Don't write about 636 either.

                  And what, they became atomic? :)
                  Quote: konstantin68
                  Not a nuclear submarine, but still. And not only them.

                  And what else?:)))
                  1. +4
                    31 July 2018 07: 41
                    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                    What else would you think up to somehow shield Putin? :))))

                    I always considered you adequate, I read your reviews and articles with interest, but I did not understand this for some reason. What does it have to do with fencing off, simply comparing the "board" of the EBN and GDP on the development and modernization of the armed forces is simply incorrect.
                    1. +1
                      31 July 2018 18: 10
                      Quote: konstantin68
                      What does it have to do with fencing off, simply comparing the “board” of the EBN and GDP on the development and modernization of the armed forces is simply incorrect.

                      Nevertheless, there is a fact - we build submarines under Putin much more slowly than we did under Yeltsin, and this despite the fact that submarines are the only one of the whole fleet that under Putin is more or less built, the rest is very bad
                      1. 0
                        1 August 2018 17: 16
                        the question is different, but how much does the submarine need to defend the country?
                        If with a digital for the SSBN it is more or less clear on the basis of the number of nuclear weapons carriers for strategic offensive arms, then with ICAPL it is not so clear - the minimum is the defense of the SSBN in position bully , i.e. 8-10 pcs. But how to evaluate the optimum? feel
      3. +3
        30 July 2018 23: 46
        Andrei, as always, you are mistaken; over the last time, repairs were carried out, including the overhaul of almost all nuclear submarines, their service life is extended and will continue to be continued until it is possible, based on the technical condition and obsolescence of the systems
        1. +1
          31 July 2018 18: 13
          Quote: vladimir1155
          Andrey, as always, you are mistaken; over the last time, repairs were carried out including the overhaul of almost all nuclear submarines

          Vladimir, you lie, don’t lie. About the situation with repairs, I wrote an entire article at the time, we have a bunch of boats that need repair, but which will not get it for sure, and there are big doubts that we will carry out the current repair program at least percent on 50, and this despite the fact that this program is constantly being adjusted downward. In general, the repair of nuclear submarines is in our afedron, and diesel-electric submarines are in a very deep afhedron, and many submarines are now on the joke because they cannot repair them
  6. +2
    30 July 2018 17: 01
    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    Quote: igorbrsv
    But under Yeltsin, the fleet really only went under the knife. Old too than bad to finish

    The old ones were also completed under Yeltsin. With him, 6 Shchuka-B boats, 1 boats of the 945A Condor project, 5 boats of the 949Antei project were put into operation, and, which is typical, all this was put into operation for 10 years, and not for 18 (and can I still forgot something, by the way)

    Thanks to Yeltsin for this .... I didn’t know who to thank ....
    1. +2
      30 July 2018 17: 48
      Quote: Stasweb
      Thanks to Yeltsin for this ....

      In general, yes - today it is the basis of our nuclear subfusion
      Quote: Stasweb
      I didn’t know who to thank ....

      Well, now you know :)
  7. 0
    30 July 2018 18: 40
    A good article ... Even with overexposure: they attributed to us and those that were under repair ... But the essence here is, as I understand it, in detail. We’re kind of like a terrible enemy so far, and therefore ... Well, this is quite normal for the defense business. As a basis for groans about lost power, please do the same. Personally, I don’t need a starving price for nothing, especially in the conditions of “solvability” of problems with nuclear weapons and the possibility of protecting “trellis” with affordable means. The nuclear fleet is an autonomous drifted club and long political “hands”. The thing is expensive, but necessary ... within reasonable limits. This is not a "maybach" in the garage for the show-offs (as our "potential friends" see), and we also have a smaller economy so that we can look after dozens of nuclear submarines.
  8. 0
    30 July 2018 19: 50
    We have a bit too mixed composition.
  9. +1
    30 July 2018 21: 34

    Do not assume that fools rule us. It's just that these people despise the homeland. For them, the loot is the most expensive. And if there is no dough, then they do not care. Here are two news.
    Vice Prime Minister complained about the high cost of Almaty. Or the same news, but in a different way, Deputy Prime Minister Borisov advised upgrading old tanks instead of purchasing Armata. But what about all this fuss about the creation of a super tank. That is, you can’t get any money in the production of Almaty? But what about defense? And notice again the exact same formula for no money. But here is the second news, the same Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov was about to produce a new super-heavy aircraft, which will replace AN-124 Ruslan. The situation is repeated as with Armata, first lurking, and then oh, liquidated. However, this is for us, for ourselves, new yachts, palaces, in a word, the people are noodles, our favorite compote.
    1. -1
      30 July 2018 22: 42
      The cost of the 40 largest yachts of Putin's oligarchs is equal to the cost of the military fleets of France or England.
      1. +9
        30 July 2018 22: 55
        Quote: albert
        equal to the cost of the navies of France or England

        So France, or England?
        Spoil the source of secret knowledge ...
        Quote: Krylov
        Sing, little light, don't be ashamed
        1. +1
          30 July 2018 23: 00
          Quote: Golovan Jack
          So France, or England?

          They are approximately equal in cost of maintenance, a troll. Here Melnichenko’s yacht is half a billion green worth. Polavianotsa.
          1. +6
            31 July 2018 07: 19
            Quote: albert
            troll...

            ... here you are. Or you.
            Quote: albert
            half a billion green worth. Polavianotsa

            Yes laaaaaadno ... It’s just “gender”.
            So what about
            Quote: albert
            the cost of the fleets of France or England

            This is a question, if it is ... but it’s accepted to answer for words, even on the Internet ... troll Yes
        2. -1
          29 August 2018 06: 52
          Spoil the source of secret knowledge ...


          Pamper yourself.

    2. +3
      30 July 2018 22: 56
      Quote: Yan Sergeev
      people noodles, myself beloved compote.

  10. +2
    30 July 2018 23: 04
    Quote: albert
    The cost of the 40 largest yachts of Putin's oligarchs is equal to the cost of the military fleets of France or England.

    And then what? Everyone sees everything, everyone hears everything, everyone knows everything ... and what? While there is only talk to them there, on our yachts put and slap on us. So when rubber boats will parade instead of ships on the day of the Navy, just like ATVs have recently paraded in Moscow, and instead of combat aircraft, they will launch kites with atomic bombs "on board", then that's all - you can order a place in the cemetery. Although now it’s not too late yet ... But the guard has been armed to the ears ... Urya. laughing
    1. +3
      31 July 2018 07: 46
      Quote: Sea Cat
      ATV parade recently

      In vain you ernichat. How many troubles the “carts” and “martyrs” did in Syria. Any weapon is a tool. Somewhere you need an excavator, and somewhere there will be a lot of MPL, an archaeological brush is needed. Like so.
  11. +1
    31 July 2018 12: 53
    Well, if a submarine can carry weapons that can destroy a continent, then there are not so many such boats - there are not so many continents! :) Quality is sometimes better than quantity! Right now, in general, they are going to fight for Space! .. :(
    1. 0
      20 September 2019 09: 45
      https://warfiles.ru/206181-ohotnik-stavshiy-zhertvoy-gibel-avianosca-koreydzhes.html ПЛ это сила
  12. 0
    31 July 2018 13: 07
    Quote: Sea Cat
    Quote: albert
    The cost of the 40 largest yachts of Putin's oligarchs is equal to the cost of the military fleets of France or England.

    So when rubber boats will parade instead of ships on the day of the Navy, just like ATVs have recently paraded in Moscow, and instead of combat aircraft, they will launch kites with atomic bombs "on board", then that's all - you can order a place in the cemetery. laughing

    Well, being motorcyclists for 13 years I’ll say that quadrics, if properly armed, with their maneuverability and dimensions will be better cars! I’ve seen a buggy somehow - you won’t get into the tank from the tank! .. Any improvements are good if they fill empty weapon niches! :)
  13. 0
    31 July 2018 13: 13
    Quote: albert
    The cost of the 40 largest yachts of Putin's oligarchs is equal to the cost of the military fleets of France or England.

    Do you think it's time to fight the oligarchs? Do you think it will be fast? And America will not use the Russian top-cleaning inside, but will quietly wait on the sidelines, shyly picking the sand with its leg ??? In Ukraine, something did not fail ... :(
  14. +3
    1 August 2018 01: 48
    Quote: Likant
    Quote: Sea Cat
    Quote: albert
    The cost of the 40 largest yachts of Putin's oligarchs is equal to the cost of the military fleets of France or England.

    So when rubber boats will parade instead of ships on the day of the Navy, just like ATVs have recently paraded in Moscow, and instead of combat aircraft, they will launch kites with atomic bombs "on board", then that's all - you can order a place in the cemetery. laughing

    Well, being motorcyclists for 13 years I’ll say that quadrics, if properly armed, with their maneuverability and dimensions will be better cars! I’ve seen a buggy somehow - you won’t get into the tank from the tank! .. Any improvements are good if they fill empty weapon niches! :)


    I have been with quadrics for ten years now. Frankly: you can’t shoot very much with him, even if you were a lefty. And the passenger is also not very happy, they went hunting together, there they would stay at speed in the saddle, and not just shoot. Before the war, the Red Army practiced the installation of a DT machine gun on a motorcycle steering wheel, which is unclear, but during the war they were convinced that this "architectural excess" and photographs of this equipment disappeared from the pages of the military chronicle. When I wrote about "quadrics and rubber boats," I meant that the military power of the country is not measured in ATVs in parades, but in more serious and advanced technology. And when our "gentlemen" order yachts to their mistresses at astronomical prices, then only ATVs remain for the army. Personally, I have nothing against quadrics at all, but on the contrary, I even love very much. But I would prefer to fight on a tank. hi
  15. 0
    19 October 2018 23: 18
    If you do not know about the existence of other submarines, this does not mean that they are not