The Black Widow's Revenge: The Legendary YF-23 in a New Version May Appear Above the Far East

55

The first prototype of the YF-23 "Black Widow II" on the runway during the tests (summer-autumn 1990 of the year)


If you plunge headlong into the period of the design formation of the American tactical aviation 5th generation, rooted in the early 80s., You can pay attention to the fact that the promising program ATF ("Advenced Tactical Fighter"), which largely determined the vision of the world's leading aerospace corporations, research institutes and experimental design bureaus on the look of next-generation multi-functional fighters can boast not only such a crown of creation from the Lockheed Martin company (in cooperation with McDonnell Douglas), like the inconspicuous tactical fighter F-22A Raptor (flight demonstration index torus / prototype YF / A-22). After even 27 years, the almost forgotten ATF competition, won by the Raptor, continues to be accompanied by the “shadow” of the unique car, which by the end of the 90th year dropped out of this race. We are talking about the inconspicuous fifth-generation fighter of the 5th generation F-23 "Black Widow II" (index of flight prototypes YF-23).



This machine, developed by Nortrop Corporation in 1990, joined the competition in the framework of the Advanced Tactical Fighter program one month before the first experimental demonstration flight of the YF / A-22 Raptor. The Black Widow flew into the air on August 27, while the Raptor stepped on September 29's wing. Somewhat later, the second YF-23 prototype, the Gray Ghost (Gray Ghost), took to the air. From this point on, between the main contenders for the role of the world's first 5-made serial fighter and the “strategic asset” in performing covert electronic and radio intelligence intelligence in the US Air Force a fierce competitive fight ensued, represented by a whole series of tests aimed at testing electrical control systems, systems thrust vector deviations (in the case of YF / A-22), as well as the identification of deficiencies in the aircraft performance characteristics.

Due to the lack of a thrust vector deviation system for the Pratt & Whitney YF-119 and General Electric F120 engines, the Black Widow and Gray Ghost (YF-23) were inferior to the future F-22A in the angular rate of turn in the plane pitch, had a larger bend radius, and also could not perform such aerobatics as "Pugachev's Cobra" and "Frolov's Chakra"; The "Raptor" mastered similar figures. At the same time, the YF-23 flight prototypes, which have not only an integrated glider circuit, but also a "diamond-shaped" wing in plan, as well as a high-performance computerized fly-by-wire control system, had much better controllability at low speeds and at high angles of attack, a dangerous stall effect overtook these machines much less frequently than the prototypes of the early Raptors. They were not inferior to the YF-23 in terms of supersonic cruising flight speed without switching to afterburner operation: at maximum (without afterburner), a speed of 1700 km / h was reached, which at that time was an excellent indicator. Meanwhile, the US Air Force Evaluation Commission gave preference to the YF / A-22 (F-22A "Raptor"), after which the Northrop YF-23 project was immediately closed.

According to various sources, the refusal of the US Air Force from the “Nortropov” brainchild has several justifications. First, it is the extremely futuristic appearance of the F-23 "Black Widow II". Apparently, the “diamond-shaped” wing, as well as the presence of only two tail-turning, full-turning tail elements with a collapse angle of about 90 degrees (instead of the standard pair of vertical stabilizers / rudders and a pair of horizontal elevators) frightened the conservative representatives of the Air Force, accustomed to the F-15C machines "Eagle", its innovative design that looked like a fancy high-altitude glider fighter from a science fiction film. Secondly, this is a more unfavorable economic situation at Lockheed Martin at the beginning of the 90s, which required an infusion from the US Congress in the form of financing the purchase of a large F-22A series, while Northrop Corporation had already received an order for serial production of strategic bombers B-2 “Spirit”, which worthily filled the company's purse. Third, servicing the future F-23 would require the United States Air Force to create a new, more complex and expensive service base.

Meanwhile, the official folding of the YF-23 project does not at all mean that the unique design features and the elemental base of the first two prototypes of this machine will not be partially embodied in promising projects of next-generation tactical fighters from other manufacturers on the Eurasian continent. Confirmation of this was news to provide RFI (Request of Information) information at the Northrop Grumman Corporation in the interests of the Japanese program for the development of the X-NUMX generation fighter F-5. We remember well that the ATD-X project of the twin-engine low-profile fighter that reached the stage of creation and the first flight tests of the demonstrator was frozen by the Japanese in November 3, which was argued by the huge costs (about 2017 billion dollars) to organize high-tech facilities and build a series of several dozen machines. Moreover, despite the duration of the establishment of the ATD-X project, the specialists of the Japanese company Ishikavagima-Harima Heavy Indusries Co., Ltd. (IHI Corporation) could not master the design of a modern nozzle with a thrust vector deflection system for engines of national development XF40-5.


The three-folding (“three-lobed”) thrust vector deflection (OAT) system on the advanced Japanese ATD-X fighter is highly reliable, but antediluvian in terms of design; there is also a loss of efficiency when the thrust vector changes, which is facilitated by the impressive gaps between the moving flaps (it is through these gaps that a partial loss of the useful jet occurs)


Fancy 3-fold controlled nozzles of the antediluvian design were installed on the demonstrator. Now, experts from the Japanese Technical Research Institute (TRDI) and the corporation Mitsubishi Heavy Industries focused on getting ready-made technological developments from the companies Boeing, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman. And it is “Northrop” that has among its American “aerospace trinity” an important trump card in the form of unique developments on the YF-23 project. Thus, in the Japanese ATD / F-3 program, this American company can finally take revenge from Lockheed Martin, which is trying to promote its F-35A Lightning-2, which is not very good at 1100 km, everywhere. Northrop specialists can offer Japanese developers such unique technological features of the Black Widow II as:

- a flat rectangular nozzle with a top-oriented cooling circuit (such a design will reduce the infrared visibility of a future Japanese fighter for infrared opto-electronic complexes placed on enemy low-flying fighters several times);
- “diamond wing”, which prevents the machine from sticking into a corkscrew when maneuvering with large angles of attack (35 or more degrees);
- double-tailing empennage with 90-degree camber, maintaining controllability at high angles of attack, as well as reducing fighter radar visibility to even lower than the F-22A "Raptor", ESR indicators (of the order of 0,05 square meters);
- ribbed overhangs, encircling the nose of the fuselage, up to the root of the wing (contributed to increased vortex formation to maintain manageability in the yaw at the angles of attack);
- constructive niches under the radio-transparent skin of the wing and elevators to accommodate additional radars of the decimeter and meter ranges with an active phased antenna array (the same radar architecture is present on our Su-5 fighter jets).



Both YF-23 flight prototypes in flight: black - board # XXUMX "Black Widow II", gray - board # XXUMX "Gray Ghost". The latter, equipped with more sophisticated, complex and expensive turbojet afterburner afterburner engine F800, with the ability to change the degree of bypass ratio in flight, was able to develop an afterburner supersonic speed in 801 km / h (the record was reached 120 in November 1900 of the year)


And this is only a small part of the entire list of technological "bells and whistles" and "buns" that the American company Northrop Grumman is ready to provide to the Japanese for taking revenge from Lockheed Martin for the fiasco in the ATF project and gaining prestige on the Asian arms market.

Information sources:
http://airwar.ru/enc/fighter/yf23.html
http://airwar.ru/enc/fighter/f22.html
http://forum.militaryparitet.com/viewtopic.php?id=21171
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    16 July 2018 07: 37
    Well, we are lucky that this particular aircraft was not put into service? Oh well ... There are plenty of similar stories. If only ... In the technical history (history of the development of technology), as in history in general, there is no subjunctive mood!
    1. +9
      16 July 2018 07: 45
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Well, we are lucky that this particular aircraft was not put into service? Oh well ... There are plenty of similar stories. If only ... In the technical history (history of the development of technology), as in history in general, there is no subjunctive mood!

      You just do not understand ... the story would go the other way, and our "patriots" would write what kind of Mr. YF-22. In general, Evgeny has a “crisis of the genre”, and for a long time he has not told us about our missile defense system in the Kuril Islands. lol
      1. +1
        16 July 2018 10: 30
        Missile defense on the Kuril Islands was once - but now there is nothing there.
        1. +8
          16 July 2018 11: 16
          Quote: Vadim237
          Missile defense on the Kuril Islands was once - but now there is nothing there.

          Yes, you sho? Probably you served there? Do not hurt the crap, because it hurts. In the Kuril Islands, even the stationary positions of the air defense missile system has never been, and do not need to fantasize. No.
          1. +3
            16 July 2018 14: 29
            Not in the Kuriles, but in Kamchatka, there was an experimental system.
            1. +5
              17 July 2018 10: 32
              Quote: Vadim237
              Not in the Kuriles, but in Kamchatka, there was an experimental system.

              I do not even know what to answer you. request You confuse the Kurile Islands with Kamchatka and apparently don’t understand the difference between the radar intended to accompany the inert ICBM warheads during test launches, before they fall on the Kura test site from the anti-missile missile system. No. System Our missile defense system is deployed only around Moscow, and this is not only the detection and tracking radar, but also anti-missiles. I do not recall that such interceptor missiles capable of destroying the combat units of ICBMs and SLBMs would be deployed in Kamchatka. And the main thing is why?
      2. -2
        20 November 2018 13: 54
        Well, you definitely don’t understand anything, you probably have a crisis of age. Show off your article, then see the reviews
        1. +1
          21 November 2018 08: 29
          Quote: usovo1
          Well, you definitely don’t understand anything, you probably have a crisis of age. Show off your article, then see the reviews

          Do you even understand who write this? fool Have you tried to watch the Bongo profile?
  2. +4
    16 July 2018 09: 01
    This is just Wishlist. Who will enable Northrops to export technology funded by the US DoD? Judging by the fact that even a penguin with a vertical landing does not give yap, Americans do not really trust yap. Although Aegis was again sold.
    1. +1
      16 July 2018 10: 36
      Like anyone - for Japan, this is the best option, the creation of the fifth generation - for 20 billion will acquire technology and finished aircraft from the United States.
    2. +3
      16 July 2018 15: 03
      where did you get the idea that verticals are not given to the Japanese?
      no restrictions, maybe any delays or technical problems.
    3. MPN
      +2
      17 July 2018 17: 43
      Quote: demiurg
      Who will enable Northrops to export technology funded by the US DoD?

      These technologies, alas, yesterday, so it’s better to sell them while someone takes
    4. +3
      19 July 2018 01: 43
      "Judging by the fact that even a penguin with a vertical landing, the yapes are not given" ////
      ----
      They even collect them at their own factory. To turn their helicopter carriers into aircraft carriers.
      But in order to gain air supremacy, they need another aircraft to replace the F-15 (which they also assemble in Japan).
  3. +3
    16 July 2018 09: 07
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Well, we are lucky that this particular aircraft was not put into service? Oh well ... There are plenty of similar stories. If only ... In the technical history (history of the development of technology), as in history in general, there is no subjunctive mood!

    You are right about the subjunctive mood. What was, was. And if each time we consider the principle "What would happen if ...." you can get into the wilds. Yes, losing the YF-23 was for the most part unexpected. All publications, including and our ZVO preferred the "23rd" rather than the "22nd" car ...
    1. +2
      16 July 2018 10: 31
      Everything is standard - lobbied F 22.
      1. +3
        19 July 2018 01: 37
        Northrop has a better glider. Lockheed has more advanced avionics.
        1. 0
          23 July 2018 20: 50
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Northrop has a better glider. Lockheed has more advanced avionics.

          Alexei, I seriously, it’s just brilliant in a nutshell to say so true about the competition between the two main manufacturers of military aircraft in the United States! That's exactly it ...
  4. 0
    16 July 2018 09: 28
    It seems to me that this is a good example of a glider for a light, medium-sized fighter of the 5th generation. Put there - Item 30 and reduce by 1,5 times.
  5. +5
    16 July 2018 11: 25
    hi ... Northrop / McDonnell Douglas YF-23 is a fifth-generation multirole fighter prototype developed by Northrop Grumman and McDonnell Douglas. In total, two copies were built - "Black Widow II" (English Black Widow II) and "Gray Ghost" (English Gray Ghost).
    1. +4
      16 July 2018 14: 31
      Beautiful car turned out however.
      1. +3
        16 July 2018 14: 55
        Quote: Vadim237
        Beautiful car turned out however.

        ... A lot of $$ was needed for revision, and the conservatism of the military affected. Eventually:
        .... Both experimental aircraft after giving up the program were transferred to NASA for load calibration studies. Currently, both of them are in flight museums in an airworthy condition.

        LTH:
        YF-23 modification
        Wingspan, m 13,29
        Aircraft Length m 20,54
        Aircraft height, m ​​4,24
        Wing area, m2 87,80
        Weight, kg
        empty equipped aircraft 16800
        takeoff weight 29000
        Fuel supply in internal tanks, l 10900
        Engine type 2 turbofan Pratt Whitney YF-119 (General Electric YF-120)
        Static forced traction, kN 2 x 155
        Maximum speed M=1,8
        Cruising speed M = 1,5
        Practical ceiling, m 18000-20000
        Combat radius of action, km 1300-1500
        Runway length, m 915
        Max. operating overload 6.
        Estimated vertical speed during landing 3,05 m/s.
        Crew 1
        Armament: built-in 20-mm cannon М61А1
        can be installed up to eight air-to-air defense class
        AIM-120 and AIM-9L.
        external nodes can be installed existing conventional weapons.
        1. 0
          16 July 2018 17: 37
          The very definition that huge expenditures are spent on refinement, debugging, etc. speaks for itself. This means that there is no clear knowledge on the basis of which the manufacture of individual parts and assemblies and the entire aircraft is carried out. Moreover, when you say that a turbine with its rotor can be calculated based only on the radius, then everyone makes a very smart look and of course makes the author a jester. And then again they spend and spend money and time, and of course remain again with their noses. About the system providing the thrust direction vector (they will come up with the same name), then generally laughter and sin
          1. +2
            16 July 2018 17: 53
            Quote: gridasov
            ... huge amounts of money are spent on refinement, debugging, etc.,

            ... This is normal practice for technology ... "The devil is in the details." ... am
            1. +1
              16 July 2018 18: 28
              Uh no, do not confuse a member with a nose. It is possible to make a part according to the drawing, and to ensure the energy balance at the end of the hydro-gas-dynamic flow on the surface by the same technique, it will not work. So what do you need? It is necessary to change the analysis methodology not just of a mobile medium, but also its transformation processes. It is necessary to see and understand the processes of algorithmic transformation of one state into another. We need a comprehensive method for analyzing all process participants without exception. And without the mathematics of analyzing super-large data, nothing can be done. And no matter how many pieces of paper you have in your pocket or bank, new knowledge is needed. At the same time, you do not need to blur your eyes with excuses that this is normal practice. This is an abnormal practice !!
              1. +6
                16 July 2018 18: 47
                Quote: gridasov
                ... to ensure the energy balance at the expiration of the hydro-gas-dynamic flow on the surface by the same technique, does not work out.

                ... But they didn’t know ... And what the flight, factory, etc. tests to carry out (with subsequent improvements) laughing
                1. +1
                  16 July 2018 19: 33
                  In my opinion, they are just like others just too high opinions about their abilities. See how many amers have experimental aircraft samples. They began to fly faster, more maneuverable than steel, or flight safety became higher. Apparently, like others, show your finger and say that it’s an idol and you’ll be praying. Because there is no own opinion. But this is still half the trouble is not great loss. But when people who are responsible for national security behave this way, then this is another matter
                  1. +5
                    16 July 2018 20: 07
                    Quote: gridasov
                    ... You probably like others show a finger and say that this is an idol and will pray

                    ...No. I’ll break my finger to the very elbow.
                    ... See how many amers have experimental aircraft samples.

                    ... Look how much the USSR has.
                    ... Because there is no own opinion.

                    am ...Because. that it is different from yours!

                    ... Read the wise guy, about how LA (not important US or RF) is not only in the "mathematical models" and
                    ... algorithmic transformation of one state into another

                    is born ... And also as a result of a whole complex of real tests ... Not one "mathematical model", from a bird to an air intake or from a rocket to a side, will not save you ... and then, you will pass from "one state to another ", as a result of the" spin "in the" gas-dynamic flow " wassat .
                    https://studfiles.net/preview/2592492/
                    ... You still have a vidos with force majeure (for clarity) ... While I'm kind bully
                    1. +3
                      16 July 2018 22: 20
                      And after these shots, someone will talk about hyperspeed and launches of ultra-modern rockets. Even there is no one to talk to.
                      1. +3
                        17 July 2018 08: 19
                        Quote: gridasov
                        And after these shots, someone will talk about hyperspeed and launches of ultra-modern missiles.

                        -- Anyway.
                        There’s no one to even talk to.

                        -- Normally tongue
                    2. +3
                      16 July 2018 23: 19
                      Hi Sanya!

                      There are several PTB discharges on this video, there have always been problems with them, and not just the amers ...
                      1. +3
                        17 July 2018 08: 11
                        Quote: NN52
                        ... there are several PTB discharges ,.

                        Hi Dim hi ... Yes, I noticed ... "blows off" them unpredictably ... On a turn it is necessary to shoot wink
                  2. +3
                    16 July 2018 23: 09
                    gridasov

                    Something I don’t recognize you today ...
                    You speak in some normal language and under different flags ... As if you were several people, and all with different levels of knowledge and beliefs ..
                    What happened?
                    Do you have my doubts?

                    Or is there no longer faith in fiction?
                    1. +2
                      17 July 2018 08: 14
                      Quote: NN52
                      gridasov
                      Something I don’t recognize you today ...
                      You speak some normal language ...

                      - Re-educated laughing
                      ... and under different flags ... As if you were several people.

                      - Levitation winked
      2. +3
        16 July 2018 23: 33
        Vadim237

        Where is the car beautiful? With a "short" nose and a "long" backside?
        And with a max overload of 6 units ..
        IMHO, however ...
        1. +2
          17 July 2018 00: 05
          Aerodynamically beautiful and correct.
          1. 0
            17 July 2018 09: 44
            And from the position of the distribution of magnetic fluxes at different flight speeds and at different altitudes - not quite right. General trends, of course, have the right orientation, but key geometric forms, especially when forming interactions with the external environment, are not thought out. At the same time, the engine remains the main issue. They are built on fundamentally incorrect design decisions.
        2. +1
          17 July 2018 10: 34
          A machine cannot be beautiful on the basis of subjective perception. A machine must be effective in the algorithm for changing physical events as phases of flight in various conditions. Therefore, based on the complex of these physical events, only a sphere can be the best geometric shape. However, at the speeds that modern engines provide, this is like a maximum disk or a minimum boomerang.
      3. 0
        17 July 2018 10: 25
        Beautiful in terms of aesthetics, in terms of gliders, beautiful, or technologically beautiful? In terms of aesthetics, we even didn’t stand next to our Sushki, either a frog or a flattened flounder, the tail plumage looks awful, any effect is more beautiful in terms of beauty! maybe good!
        1. 0
          17 July 2018 10: 41
          The shape of the machine is based on the analysis of spectral colors that determine the distribution of loads when air-blown by a small-scale model. However, any spectral color is a consequence of the level of magnetic flux density in a given flight environment or model blowing. Therefore, engineers simply do not understand the depths of those processes that they see with their own eyes and at the level of those knowledge that allows us to draw adequate conclusions. Therefore, I say that the trends are positive, but the time to solve these problems is extended over a long period
  6. 0
    16 July 2018 14: 06
    Maybe still "Advanced", there is a difference))
  7. +2
    17 July 2018 09: 08
    Great plane ... And the design generally falls in love with itself.
    1. 0
      17 July 2018 10: 26
      ZV lover .. lol ?
  8. 0
    17 July 2018 22: 21
    We would also remember the famous computer F-19, which never flew ...
  9. 0
    18 July 2018 17: 37
    It would be nice for our specialists to reduce the stealth of SU 57 so that the engines do not stick out so much out of the plane
  10. +1
    21 July 2018 22: 54
    Damn, it was just a matter of price and speed of deliveries to the troops. Americans know how to count money. The USSR collapsed, and Russia in the 90s could not answer in any way to the development of fifth-generation fighters. As a result, the cheapest project was chosen, which was then also trimmed. At first it was assumed that the fighter for gaining superiority in the air would be the F-23, and the front-line F22. Then, since Russia could not answer with anything, they decided to compare and choose a cheaper project. Well, and then he was cut from 1100 to the 184s, and even the first batch of 300 was cut to the indicated 184s. Yes, and the technical justification had to be written: what for they are needed and these expensive 184 Raptor, if Russia does not want to answer? That’s the whole story of these two projects. Now the Raptor will remain a fighter to gain superiority over a small number of Su-57 and 4th generation junk. And the main workhorse, that is, the front-line multipurpose and accordingly averaged fighter will be the F-35. That's the whole layout. Moreover, if the United States is completely reequipped for the 5th generation, then all fourth-generation fighters in Russia immediately become flying scrap metal, unless Russia has a special radio-absorbing coating in its secrets that could bring stealth characteristics of 4th-generation aircraft to fighter jets 5 th. That’s all.
    1. 0
      21 July 2018 22: 57
      But if there is such a cover by some miracle, then a very interesting situation will turn out: air-to-air missiles are rubbish again and over-maneuverability and cannon armament come to the fore within direct line of sight. There you go.
    2. 0
      29 August 2018 10: 18
      IMHO F-35 is not a bit superior to the "trash" of the 4th generation. at least the cheaper Su-27 (and its derivatives) and the F-15 loses
  11. +1
    22 July 2018 17: 14
    Quote: Vadim237
    Missile defense on the Kuril Islands was once - but now there is nothing there.

    - Yes, when she, to hell, "was" ?? When the South Korean Boeing 747 flew 1200 kilometers first over all the forbidden zones and landfills over Kamchatka (only over its land - more than 400 km!), Then sawed through Sakhalin - and only at the exit was his “brave hero”, which was 15 minutes away 12-15 km range dangled behind the tail of this Boeing "like shit in an ice hole", instead of as it should be: come close and identify, and then give the required signals ...

    Oh, these falsifiers of history ...
  12. +1
    22 July 2018 17: 19
    Quote: MPN
    Quote: demiurg
    Who will enable Northrops to export technology funded by the US DoD?

    These technologies, alas, yesterday, so it’s better to sell them while someone takes

    - Yesterday for the USA, tomorrow for China, after tomorrow for Russia ... Different countries live technologically in completely different time layers: in the USA - the XNUMXst century, in Russia - the end of the XNUMXth, in Nigeria - the beginning of the XNUMXth go, in Turkmenistan - the XNUMXth century, etc.
    1. 0
      23 July 2018 20: 59
      Quote: Outsider
      Yesterday for the USA, tomorrow for China, and after tomorrow for Russia ... Different countries live technologically in completely different time layers: in the USA - the 21st century, in Russia - the end of the 20th, in Nigeria - the beginning of the 19th , in Turkmenistan - the 17th century, etc.

      Unfortunately I can not disagree with you, in many ways you are right ...
  13. +1
    22 July 2018 17: 24
    Quote: gridasov
    And after these shots, someone will talk about hyperspeed and launches of ultra-modern rockets. Even there is no one to talk to.

    - Do not tell the audience with rants about the "backwardness" of the US aviation industry. No one will believe you.
  14. +2
    22 July 2018 17: 27
    Quote: gridasov
    A machine cannot be beautiful on the basis of subjective perception. A machine must be effective in the algorithm for changing physical events as phases of flight in various conditions. Therefore, based on the complex of these physical events, only a sphere can be the best geometric shape. However, at the speeds that modern engines provide, this is like a maximum disk or a minimum boomerang.

    - In "Ward No.:" today they are released without orderlies ?! The best geometric shape for an airplane is Flying Wing- Consider yourself somewhere, otherwise tomorrow you will forget again and begin to drive about the sphere of schizo ...
  15. +1
    22 July 2018 17: 30
    Quote: rtutaloe
    ... At first it was assumed that the fighter for gaining superiority in the air would be the F-23, and the front-line F22.

    - It is the same. F-22 is the fighter of gaining dominance in the air, he is also the front-line fighternaturally.
  16. +1
    22 July 2018 17: 39
    Quote: rtutaloe
    But if there is such a cover by some miracle, then a very interesting situation will turn out: air-to-air missiles are rubbish again and over-maneuverability and cannon armament come to the fore within direct line of sight. There you go.

    - This nonsense stubbornly and constantly circulates in RuNet, but this is not true. The means for detecting air targets will simply be continuously improved - in AFAR PPM on gallium arsenide they will be replaced by those on gallium nitride (power increases by 40-60 %%), electron-optical devices will be improved, horizon-based radars and surface-wave radars will be used more widely with the issuance of data to all consumers - SAM and IA, and on the SAM and the airborne missile launcher, multi-mode GOS will become more widespread, for example, on the Israeli rocket "Stanner" (the English name) there are already two-mode GOS - and a millimeter active radar and thermal imaging GOS, which is everything equally - stealth, or not stealth in front of her ..

    .
  17. 0
    24 November 2018 02: 35
    And I don’t remember something when the raptor did Cobra Pugachev. Oh, you have to eat, it’s just shot as beautifully close, and from a distance you see that some kind of corbra is stretched.