New radar to replace the "beetles"

16
Over the past few decades, the issue of avionics (avionics) has become one of the main aspects of development aviation. Moreover, starting from the third generation, all the combat prospects of fighter aircraft are more closely related precisely to avionics and ammunition electronics. The most promising area in the field of on-board electronics is currently airborne radar (phased radar) with a phased array (PAR). Widely known are domestic radars with a phased antenna array of the Zhuk family. At the same time, despite all the prospects of this line, its creator, the Fazotron-NIIR enterprise, together with the Scientific Center for Special Radioelectronic Systems of the Moscow Aviation Institute, has already begun developing a new radar for future aircraft.

New radar to replace the "beetles"
Radar "Zhuk-AE"


The final name of the development has not yet become public (with a high probability it will no longer be “Beetle”), but a number of technical and conceptual details have been made publicly available. Thus, it is argued that the new station has the following working title: Multipurpose scalable radar or abbreviated MBRLS. According to the available information, MBRLS will be executed according to a modular scheme, which will facilitate the work on the repair or modernization of the station. At the same time, as part of the new on-board radar there will be a separate module responsible for monitoring the performance of all its parts. It is possible that it will allow the maintenance of the MBRLS to the kind that the US designers are aiming for: a cable is connected to the appropriate connector of the aircraft, and the station itself transmits all the collected information about its condition to a special control panel. It analyzes data and automatics gives technical staff recommendations on the work required.

However, the introduction of a separate monitoring module can not affect the weight and dimensions of the entire station. But in recent years, electronics engineers around the world are trying to reduce the weight and size parameters of their creations. According to various estimates, an aircraft radar can overcome the threshold in 150 kilograms of weight only if the emphasis is placed not only on its “iron” part, but also on software. First of all, you need to create such hardware and software that could work with a speed of about 35-40 gigaflops (floating point operations per second). By world standards, this is not a difficult task, but in the conditions of a significant lag of the domestic element base, the creation of such computers becomes much more difficult. In addition, the MBRLS software has several features, which, combined with the nuances of the entire avionics, required the introduction of a separate unit for mathematical modeling of a number of processes, namely: processing the received signal, tracking its own state, simulating the movement of the aircraft carrier and ensuring its navigation. In perspective, any of the listed software modules can be “upgraded” to the new version with the best performance.

In addition to the control module and the process modeling module as part of the radar, as is clear, there must be other units. Moreover, their presence in the case of new developments also requires a number of innovations. As it became known, at the Fazotron-NIIR perspective MBRLS, the connection between the individual modules will be provided by the RapidIO interface with a bandwidth up to 1066 MB / s, which has proven itself well in many foreign electronic systems. According to unconfirmed data, the current architecture of the promising MBRLS with timely upgrades will be able to provide the aircraft with all the necessary qualities for 25-30 years or even more. Another positive aspect of this architecture concerns the placement of individual radar units on the airframe. Thanks to the use of RapidIO tires, if necessary, it is possible to install station modules not as a single unit, but one at a time in possible places of the airframe. The maximum distance at which the wiring allows the radar to function normally is approximately equal to the 10 meters. In addition to the convenience of layout, this can also contribute to an increase in the combat survivability of the aircraft radar in case of its defeat.

Unfortunately, the above describes everything that is known from the new project of JSC Fazotron-NIIR. The fact is that at the moment only what was told by representatives of the enterprise developer at the exhibition “High Technologies of the 21st Century” that was held recently in Moscow is known about the MBRLS project. However, there is data on progress. So, in March of this year, bench tests of a millimeter radio module from the future MBRLS began. According to unverified data, Phazotron plans to finish work on this node by the end of the year, and a full-fledged “presentation to the public” should be expected at the MAKS-2013 showroom. Probably, by the same time, not only the architectural features, but also some technical data of the new radar will be announced.

On the materials of the sites:
http://nvo.ng.ru/
http://www.phazotron.com/
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    4 May 2012 09: 20
    Drop dead!
    News is class!
    Give high-tech development!
    1. Pedro
      +3
      4 May 2012 10: 40
      Підтримую !!!
    2. Neighbor
      0
      4 May 2012 16: 51
      Quote: will be able to provide aircraft with all the necessary qualities for 25-30 years or even more!
      good drinks wink
    3. Boba
      0
      6 May 2012 02: 02
      The author is not quite in the subject. We have prots for NVCom-01 radars with 3,6 Gflops: http://multicore.ru/index.php?id=601 And they are parallel. Not only on RapidIO, but also on SpaceWire: http://multicore.ru/index.php?id=27
      And they have: http://www.russianelectronics.ru/developer-r/review/2191/doc/44291/
      And on the radar in more detail: http://vpk.name/news/68481_innovacionnyii_proryiv_fazotrona.html
  2. +6
    4 May 2012 11: 04
    To the great regret, the imperfection of the element base is still a headache for Russian military electronics, however, civilian too, but nowadays, without exaggeration, electronics is the basis of almost all types of weapons, there’s nothing to say about communications. It’s time for the state to start more actively finance this industry, because hopes that the business will do it
    absolutely no, the necessary investments and payback periods are too long.
    1. 755962
      +5
      4 May 2012 14: 02
      Quote: crossbow
      imperfection of the element base is still a headache for Russian military electronics

      It is not regrettable, but it is. Rogozin: military electronics in the Russian Federation is 12 years behind foreign
      The level of Russian military electronics in some areas is 12 years behind foreign, said Dmitry Rogozin, Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation.

      “The security of the electronic base of the sphere of development and production of military equipment as of January 1, 2012 averaged up to 70%, the scope of its operation - up to 85%, according to the RF Ministry of Defense. And its technical level is 5-12 years behind the foreign level for various product groups, ”said the Deputy Prime Minister at a meeting on the development of domestic microelectronics in the Government House on Monday.

      According to Rogozin, the production of special-purpose microelectronics is now small-scale, unprofitable for manufacturers and needs state support.
      http://aktualno.ru/view2/11109
  3. toguns
    +1
    4 May 2012 13: 33
    We wait, hope and believe !!!
  4. 0
    4 May 2012 16: 36
    Now, research institutes will get students tucked up and come up with something that we’ll even overtake everyone !!!!!!!! bully
  5. Stasi.
    +1
    4 May 2012 22: 59
    In modern aerial combat, superiority is given to aircraft whose radars see further, are more resistant to interference, detect more targets than the enemy, and also detect inconspicuous targets on the ground, in the air and at sea. I am sure that we have every opportunity to equip our aviation with all promising radars.
  6. vylvyn
    0
    5 May 2012 04: 17
    IMHO, the evolution of radar systems in the direction of miniaturization, a qualitative increase in the level of their combat capabilities, improvement of software and its integration with aircraft systems will ultimately lead our aviation to a qualitative leap towards unmanned, capable of performing combat missions under loads significantly exceeding the limit of human capabilities .
    1. +3
      5 May 2012 04: 24
      On the MIG-31, the radar is on lamps and works very well by the way ... maybe we can go our own way and not turn everything into gadgets ... because the result is important ... and not how it is made and from what ... I still have then the old monitor and eyes get tired less ...
  7. Opertak
    +2
    5 May 2012 09: 28
    The lag in hardware is quite quickly and fully compensated by our superiority in mathematics, algorithms, including combat ones, as well as a high level of programming. For example: the first computer complex for the PRN system in the USSR was Kartsevsky 5E73, built on the basis of the American IBM360. The domestic electronic base then also lagged behind, but due to the software and algorithmic complex, the system worked in such a way that the Americans were envious - for them it was unattainable. By the way, now too.
  8. Olegovich
    +2
    5 May 2012 13: 49
    Just a thought in the subject:
    In Soviet times, there was a concept that one can resist and survive in the event of a nuclear war. Anti-nuclear shelters were built, directives were issued for the development of special equipment. In the prefix "special" fit, in particular, such a characteristic as the resistance of the equipment to the effects of an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). In an atomic explosion, in addition to a light flash, radioactive radiation and a shock wave, a very powerful pulse of an electromagnetic field is generated, which, propagating at the speed of light, creates such interference in electrical and radio equipment that it breaks down. By the way, this fact was reflected in one Hollywood film about the beginning of a nuclear war: a bomb exploded, nothing was heard yet and the trees were not uprooted, but suddenly all the engines of the cars on the road went out. This EMP worked. So the requirements for electronic components for EMP from the military, especially for missiles and attack aircraft, were such that the equipment had to remain operational at a distance of 10-15 km from the epicenter of a nuclear explosion. I asked one military representative: "After all, at such a distance from the pilot in a couple of seconds, even the ashes will not remain, the equipment will be needed." He replied: "The pilot will die, but the equipment must complete the combat mission." This is about the cost of human life and strategy.
    1. 0
      10 May 2012 11: 17
      The lamp base is resistant to electromagnetic radiation, but sensitive to mechanical stress, has a large weight and enormous power consumption (high heating, powerful, and therefore heavier generator), long lead-up time. belay
  9. Oladushkin
    +3
    5 May 2012 14: 44
    Let our airmen have the equipment that will be the best for many years to come!
  10. 0
    9 May 2012 12: 02
    Let our radar be heavier than that of our sworn enemies, but our aircraft have higher thrust-weight ratio! (We will answer with our thrust-weight ratio for our excess weight!) wassat
  11. 0
    3 March 2015 15: 13
    Unfortunately the information is very scarce.