Military Review

Technical details: nuclear-powered rocket

220

The first stage is denial.



The German expert in the field of rocket technology, Robert Schmucker, considered the statements of V. Putin to be absolutely implausible. "I can not imagine that the Russians can create a small flying reactor," said the expert in an interview with Deutsche Welle.

Can, Herr Schmuker. Just imagine.

The first domestic satellite with a nuclear power plant (“Cosmos-367”) was launched from Baikonur in the distant 1970 year. The 37 fuel assemblies of the BES-5 Buk compact reactor containing 30 kg of uranium at the temperature in the primary circuit 700 ° С and the heat generation 100 kW provided the electrical power of the 3 kW unit. The mass of the reactor is less than one ton, the estimated operating time of the 120-130 day.

Experts will express doubt: the power of this nuclear “battery” is too low ... But! You look at the date: it was half a century ago.

Low efficiency - a consequence of thermionic conversion. In other forms of energy transfer, the indicators are much higher, for example, in NPPs, the efficiency value is within 32-38%. In this sense, the thermal power of the “cosmic” reactor is of particular interest. 100 kW - a serious bid to win.

Technical details: nuclear-powered rocket


It should be noted that BES-5 “Buk” does not belong to the RTG family. Radioisotope thermoelectric generators convert the energy of the natural decay of atoms of radioactive elements and have negligible power. At the same time, Buk is a real chain-driven reactor.

The next generation of Soviet small-sized reactors, which appeared at the end of the 1980-s, was distinguished by even smaller dimensions and greater energy release. This was the unique “Topaz”: compared with “Buk”, the amount of uranium in the reactor was reduced three times (to 11,5 kg). Thermal power increased by 50% and amounted to 150 kW, the time of continuous operation reached 11 months (a reactor of this type was installed onboard the Kosmos-1867 reconnaissance satellite).


Nuclear space reactors are an extraterrestrial form of death. With the loss of control, the “shooting star” didn’t fulfill desires, but could let the “lucky ones” off their sins.


In 1992, the two remaining copies of the Topaz series small-sized reactors were sold in the US for $ 13 million.

The main question is: is there enough power for such installations to use them as rocket engines? By passing the working fluid (air) through the hot core of the reactor and receiving the output of thrust according to the law of conservation of momentum.

The answer is no. “Buk” and “Topaz” are compact nuclear power plants. To create a YARD requires other means. But the overall trend is visible to the naked eye. Compact nuclear power plants have long been created and exist in practice.

What power should a nuclear power unit have to be used as a cruise missile cruise engine, similar in size to X-101?

Can't find a job? Multiply time for power!
(Collection of universal tips.)


Find power is also not difficult. N = F × V.

According to official data, the X-101 cruise missiles, as well as the CD of the “Caliber” family, are equipped with a short-service TRDD-50 developing thrust 450 kgf (≈ 4400 N). Cruise speed of a cruise missile is 0,8M, or 270 m / s. The ideal design efficiency of a turbojet bypass engine is 30%.

In this case, the required power of the cruise missile engine is only 25 times the thermal capacity of the Topaz reactor.

Despite the doubts of the German expert, the creation of a nuclear turbojet (or direct-flow) rocket engine is a realistic task that meets the requirements of modernity.

Rocket from hell

“All of this is a surprise - a nuclear-powered cruise missile,” said Douglas Barry, senior researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London. “This idea is not new, it was talked about in 60's, but it faced a lot of obstacles.”

This is not only talked about. On tests in 1964, the Tori-IIC ramjet engine developed 16 tons of thrust with the thermal power of the 513 MW reactor. Simulating a supersonic flight, the installation consumed 450 tons of compressed air in five minutes. The reactor was designed very “hot” - the operating temperature in the core reached 1600 ° С. The design had very narrow tolerances: in a number of areas the permissible temperature was only 150-200 ° С below the temperature at which the elements of the rocket melted and collapsed.

Were there enough of these indicators for the use of the LVRS as an engine in practice? The answer is obvious.

The nuclear ramjet engine has developed a greater (!) Thrust than the SR-71 “Black Bird” SR-XNUMX turbo-jet engine.


"Polygon-401", nuclear ramjet tests


The experimental installations “Tori-IIA” and “-IIC” are the prototypes of the nuclear engine of the SLAM cruise missile.

Devilish invention capable, according to calculations, to pierce 160 000 km of space at a minimum height with a speed of 3M. Literally “mowing down” everyone who met on her mournful way, with a shock wave and a thunderous rumble in 162 dB (deadly meaning for a person).

Reactor combat LA had no biological protection. The eardrums broken after the SLAM fly-over would seem to be an insignificant circumstance against the background of radioactive emissions from the rocket nozzle. The flying monster left behind a train more than a kilometer wide with a dose of 200-300 rad. According to calculations, in one hour of flight, SLAM infected 1800 square miles with lethal radiation.



According to calculations, the length of the aircraft could reach 26 meters. Starting weight - 27 tons. Combat load - thermonuclear charges, which were required to be consistently dropped on several Soviet cities, along the missile flight route. After the completion of the main task, SLAM had to circle the USSR for several more days, infecting everything around with radioactive emissions.

Perhaps the most deadly weapon of all that people tried to create. Fortunately, things did not go as far as real launches.

The project, codenamed “Pluto,” was collapsed on July 1 of the year 1964. At the same time, according to one of the SLAM developers, J. Craven, none of the US military and political leadership regretted the decision.

The reason for the rejection of the "low-flying nuclear missile" was the development of intercontinental ballistic missiles. Capable of inflicting the necessary damage in less time with incomparable risks for the military themselves. As the authors of the publication in the Air & Space magazine rightly noted: ICBMs, at least, did not kill everyone who was near the launcher.

It is still unknown who, where and how he planned to carry out tests of the fiend. And who would answer if SLAM lost its course and flew over Los Angeles. One of the insane offers offered to tie a rocket to the cable and drive in a circle over the deserted areas. Nevada. However, another question immediately arose: what to do with the rocket when the last remnants of fuel are burned out in the reactor? The place where the SLAM “lands” will not be possible to approach for centuries.

Life or death. Final choice

Unlike the mystical “Pluto,” originally from the 1950s, the project of a modern nuclear missile, voiced by V. Putin, proposes the creation of an effective means for breaking through the American ABM system. A means of guaranteed mutual destruction is the most important criterion for nuclear deterrence.

The transformation of the classic “nuclear triad” into a devilish “pentagram” - with the inclusion of new generation delivery vehicles (nuclear cruise missiles of unlimited range and strategic “6” status nuclear torpedoes), coupled with the modernization of ICBM warheads (maneuvering “Avant-garde”) is reasonable response to the emergence of new threats. Washington’s policy on missile defense leaves Moscow no other choice.

“You are developing your anti-missile systems. The range of anti-missiles increases, the accuracy increases, this weapon is improved. Therefore, we need to adequately respond to this so that we can overcome the system not only today, but also tomorrow, when you will have a new weapon. ”

V. Putin in an interview with NBC.

The declassified details of the experiments on the SLAM / Pluto program convincingly prove that the creation of a nuclear cruise missile was possible (technically feasible) six decades ago. Modern technology allows you to bring the idea to a new technical level.

Sword rushes from promises

Despite a lot of obvious facts explaining the reasons for the emergence of a “super-weapon of the president” and dispelling any doubts about the “impossibility” of creating such systems, in Russia, as well as abroad, many skeptics remain. "All of these weapons - only a means of information warfare." And next - a variety of proposals.

Probably, you should not take seriously caricature "experts", such as I. Moiseyev. The head of the Space Policy Institute (?), Who told The Insider online publication: “You can't put a nuclear engine on a cruise missile. Yes and no such engines. ”

Attempts to “expose” the statements of the president are being made at a more serious analytical level. Such “investigations” immediately gain popularity among the liberal-minded public. Skeptics make the following arguments.

All sounded complexes belong to the strategic top-secret weapons, to check or deny the existence of which is not possible. (In the message itself, the Federal Assembly demonstrated computer graphics and footage of launches indistinguishable from testing other types of cruise missiles.) At the same time, no one talks, for example, about creating a heavy assault drone or a destroyer-class combat ship. Weapons, which soon would have to demonstrate the entire world.

According to some “whistleblowers”, the purely strategic, “secret” context of messages may indicate their implausible nature. Well, if this is the main argument, then what is the dispute with these people about?

There is another point of view. Shocking news about nuclear missiles and unmanned 100 hub submarines are being made against the background of the obvious problems of the military-industrial complex encountered in the implementation of simpler projects of “traditional” weapons. Statements about missiles that once surpassed all existing types of weapons have a sharp contrast against the background of the well-known situation with rocket production. Skeptics cite as an example the massive failures during the launch of the Bulava or the creation of the Angara LV, which lasted for two decades. Herself история started in 1995 year; Speaking in November 2017, Deputy Prime Minister D. Rogozin promised to resume the launch of the Angara from the Vostochny cosmodrome only in ... 2021

And, by the way, why was “Zircon” ignored - the main naval sensation of the previous year? Hypersonic rocket that can cross out all existing concepts of sea battle.



The news of the entry into the troops of laser systems attracted the attention of manufacturers of laser systems. Existing models of directed energy weapons were created on an extensive base of research and development of high-tech equipment for the civilian market. For example, the American ship installation AN / SEQ-3 LaWS is a “pack” of six welding lasers with a total power of 33 kW.

The statement about the creation of a super-power combat laser is contrasted against the background of a very weak laser industry: Russia is not among the world's largest manufacturers of laser equipment (Coherent, IPG Photonics or Chinese Han 'Laser Technology). Therefore, the sudden appearance of samples of high-power laser weapons causes genuine interest among specialists.

There are always more questions than answers. The devil is in the details, but official sources give a very poor understanding of the latest weapons. Often, it is even unclear whether the system is ready for adoption, or its development is at a certain stage. Known precedents associated with the creation of such weapons in the past, indicate that the problems arising from this are not solved by the click of a finger. Fans of technical innovations are concerned with the choice of location for testing the nuclear engine with CD. Or methods of communication with the status-6 submarine drone (the fundamental problem: radio communication does not work under water, during the communication sessions the submarines are forced to rise to the surface). It would be interesting to hear an explanation of how to use it: Compared to traditional ICBMs and SLBMs capable of starting and ending a war within an hour, the Status-6 will take several days to reach the US coast. When there will be no one!

The last battle is over.
Has anyone stayed alive?
In response, only the wind howl ...

Using materials:
Air & Space Magazine (April-May 1990)
The Silent War, by John Craven
Author:
220 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 12 March 2018 06: 18
    +7
    The last battle is over.
    Has anyone stayed alive?
    In response - only the wind howling ...
    1. Artek
      Artek 12 March 2018 08: 26
      +10
      The German expert in the field of rocket technology, Robert Schmucker, considered the statements of V. Putin to be absolutely implausible. "I can not imagine that the Russians can create a small flying reactor," said the expert in an interview with Deutsche Welle.


      dog barked at uncle fraer
      she herself did not know whom she was biting ...
      the creation of a small reactor is not in doubt, but to establish effective heat transfer between the reactor body and the incoming air flow, so that there would be an explosive expansion of the gas, and even so that this process would become continuous? The solution to this problem is respected. This is for a ramjet engine. To create a turbine when the air heated by the reactor will spin the blades seems to be a more realistic task.
    2. Dead duck
      Dead duck 12 March 2018 14: 39
      +3
      "opened sauron's chocolate eye" lol
      1. Maz
        Maz 17 March 2018 16: 37
        +2
        And on which submarine to rise for radio communications? Shaw, the ejected pop-up antenna has already been canceled? There the cable length is up to five kilometers, Karl! Expert I watch this Kravtsov marine business
    3. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 12 March 2018 18: 30
      +10
      All that I had to hear and read, all the arguments go around the possibility of creating a small-sized nuclear reactor and a rocket engine based on it.
      But ... BUT! Something I did not notice anywhere about the fate of the reactor after reaching the goal of the flight! Or is it immediately a nuclear warhead, due to explode at the target? That is, Russian designers managed to assemble and test (!!!) the weapons of the Apocalypse? Ie the weapon of the last blow? After all, even a missile’s defeat along the route does not save anyone from subsequent radioactive contamination! Interesting things "your Lord"!
      1. Titsen
        Titsen 13 March 2018 07: 15
        +1
        Quote: Starover_Z
        All that I had to hear and read, all the arguments go around the possibility of creating a small-sized nuclear reactor and a rocket engine based on it.
        But ... BUT! Something I did not notice anywhere about the fate of the reactor after reaching the goal of the flight! Or is it immediately a nuclear warhead, due to explode at the target? That is, Russian designers managed to assemble and test (!!!) the weapons of the Apocalypse? Ie the weapon of the last blow? After all, even a missile’s defeat along the route does not save anyone from subsequent radioactive contamination! Interesting things "your Lord"!


        This is the most interesting commentary a few days after the Message.

        And, apparently, a similar thought dawned on the mattress-striped partners and their hangers-on.

        Thought hard.

        And what, cheap and cheer angrily!

        And then we don’t have a choice ...
        1. Shaska
          Shaska 15 March 2018 07: 19
          +6
          So VV said bluntly in a subsequent interview - HELLO NEED PEACE, IF RUSSIA IS NOT PROVIDED IN IT? (and I completely agree with him)
          MAKING CONCLUSIONS fellow
    4. The comment was deleted.
  2. Ingvar 72
    Ingvar 72 12 March 2018 07: 04
    +100
    In 1992, the two remaining copies of the Topaz series small-sized reactors were sold in the US for $ 13 million.
    Did not know. request Thanks again to Yeltsin. I will Eburg - I’ll stop by to spit on its center.
    1. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 12 March 2018 08: 36
      +62
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Thanks again to Yeltsin. I will Eburg - I’ll stop by to spit on its center

      And please spit from me! ..... two times (!) good
      1. Sverdlov
        Sverdlov 12 March 2018 10: 10
        +27
        And I’m not far from him, just six kilometers, to add - just spit, scum!
      2. Fosfor_ru
        Fosfor_ru 17 March 2018 18: 05
        +2
        need to create a folk flash mob. Drooling can be mailed in bags). To make it clear the scale of people's love for the greatest figure
      3. Abel
        Abel 19 March 2018 01: 03
        +1
        If everyone spits on the B-Center, Yekaterinburg will drown. sorry, good city
    2. wicked pinnochio
      wicked pinnochio 12 March 2018 09: 49
      +22
      come personally I will also spend and help to spit
    3. Herman 4223
      Herman 4223 12 March 2018 11: 12
      +19
      From me please too !!!
    4. CHARM
      CHARM 12 March 2018 11: 22
      +28
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Did not know. Thanks again to Yeltsin. I will Eburg - I’ll stop by to spit on its center.

      You don’t need to spit there, but come with an excavator and level it all down. It is only in Russia, a thumping worker, and simply a drunken drunk, could drunkenly move up the career ladder, and refine to the president of the country.
      As for the nuclear-powered rocket ... the stage of negation has passed, now the stage of sobering has begun. Correctly Kedmi said-the teacher won the war.
      1. Vasilenko Vladimir
        Vasilenko Vladimir 12 March 2018 14: 29
        +17
        Quote: OBEREG
        to come with an excavator and level everything.

        liberalists to expel and make dm pioneers, what kind of wastefulness is this?
        1. CHARM
          CHARM 12 March 2018 14: 37
          +16
          Quote: Vasilenko Vladimir
          liberalists to expel and make dm pioneers, what kind of wastefulness is this?

          Not wastefulness, but a method of stimulating memory. In general, Russia is a very controversial country. In our main square of the country lies the mummy of a man who did everything to destroy the Russian empire. Moreover, in each city we have monuments to him. We were smeared with shit during the time of Gorbachev, and after 30 years, we had people who would vote for Grudinin, Sobchak .. Our country was put on its knees during the time of Yeltsin, disarmed, and bled (this period is equal to death in war ), and we are building the Yeltsin Center. And now you’re talking about the house of pioneers. It's a good thing, I’m not arguing. Just the facts of memory and humiliation must be nailed to our heads with nails so that neither 17 years old nor 85, nor 91 years old will repeat. Therefore, an excavator.
          1. businessv
            businessv 12 March 2018 15: 37
            +3
            Quote: OBEREG
            Yes, only the facts of memory and humiliation must be nailed to our heads with nails, so that neither the 17th year of the year 85, nor the 91th, or the XNUMXst would repeat. Therefore, an excavator.

            That's just the excavator - it is radically, in Lenin's style! It is enough to make a marquee with a list of Yeltsin’s “merits” at the entrance to Yeltsin’s home-pioneers, and the public path will not grow to it, memory is guaranteed! fellow
          2. V. Salama
            V. Salama 12 March 2018 17: 04
            +15
            Quote: OBEREG

            ... In our main square of the country lies the mummy of a man who did everything to destroy the Russian empire. ...

            .... we have people who will vote for Grudinin, ...

            Well, the one who lies on the main square didn’t destroy the Russian Empire (everything was already destroyed without it), he revived it in the form of the Soviet Union. You can’t know the history of your country so badly.
            And what about the people who will vote ...? In our country, elections cannot be won, especially since a change of political course is supposed to be won, at least another 15 years is necessary, when all History will be completed. And after the election, Grudinin will not be forgiven for fear, so I think he will not bother you anymore. Yes, there will no longer be any need for anyone to worry there, elections will not be needed there, everything will be new, so I think.
            1. CHARM
              CHARM 12 March 2018 17: 14
              +4
              Quote: V. Salama
              Well, the one who lies on the main square just did not destroy the Russian Empire (everything was already destroyed without it),

              Oh how. And what was destroyed there before this figure? Very interesting to listen to.

              Quote: V. Salama
              he revived it in the form of the Soviet Union

              Well of course ... putting millions of lives in doing so. But he lived a curly-haired boy, in a good family, with a good education ...
              Quote: V. Salama
              You can’t know the history of your country so badly.

              When you turn to your opponent with such non-clever statements, think, maybe you don’t know the story.
              But I’m interested in listening to your version of events, especially on the issue of the collapse of the Russian Empire to Lenin.
              1. V. Salama
                V. Salama 12 March 2018 18: 56
                +17
                Quote: OBEREG

                .........
                When you turn to your opponent with such non-clever statements, think, maybe you don’t know the story.

                But I’m interested in listening to your version of events, especially on the issue of the collapse of the Russian Empire to Lenin.

                "Oh how."
                To your surprise, I begin to understand how everything is extremely running. In addition, according to the theory of efficiency, your first phrase here indicates the absence of subject
                object contradiction without which no activity arises, including the pedagogical process. That is, you do not need it, it is not interesting, at least you are not going to believe me. So what is the point for me to throw beads ... If you need you to find material without me, there is no normal literature - Google to help, the Internet is full of necessary things. At the same time, the criticality of perception is supposed to be nothing, separate the grain from the chaff. And what do you want - "learning is light, but you have to pay for light." Joke. Do you really think that in this format, by pointing a finger at the smartphone, I will present you the facts in the logical chain of historical events. I did not plan this, just drew your attention that everything was not the way you think. And if I lied, then my honor and conscience will suffer. I think you are convinced that for people like me, in principle, it can’t be. But if you do not bother to raise your self-education, then the time will come, your conscience will torment you, and before whom? Yes, in front of me, I’m clearly not counting here. Although the world is small, there will be a chance, I will not miss the opportunity to recall.
                In your second statement here, you declare that it would be interesting to listen ... How inwardly contradictory are you, however, yourself or whom you want to deceive? We still have to say something.
                Before this “leader” after the February Revolution, by the summer, the country was almost destroyed. October, what the Bolsheviks are doing. Civil war, who started and organized. We take Wikipedia, we find “Intervention”, we begin to understand that the West has already divided the country for a long time, and now it is robbing and selling according to plans already at the end of the 19th century. White, red terror of the target, who started, how long, the number of victims. Stalinist repression: the total number of repressed, by social groups, the number of executed. This can be immediately to A. Wasserman, if necessary immediately and quickly.
                Understand this, according to reliable sources, then it will be easier. Well, all I can for now ...
            2. Days
              Days 14 March 2018 00: 04
              0
              Quote: V. Salama
              Well, the one who lies on the main square just did not destroy the Russian Empire (everything was already destroyed without it),

              It was destroyed without him simply because he himself did not have time. But I tried very hard. Comrade Lenin has been purposefully moving toward revolution for at least 25 years, i.e. to blood, devastation and chaos.
              1. V. Salama
                V. Salama 14 March 2018 19: 00
                +5
                Quote: Dagen

                It was destroyed without him simply because he himself did not have time. But I tried very hard. Comrade Lenin has been purposefully moving toward revolution for at least 25 years, i.e. to blood, devastation and chaos.

                Watching the progress of A. Mamontov’s telecasts on the Spas TV channel, I came to a number of conclusions that allow us to evaluate you as a person who is sincerely and deeply religious. Do not exacerbate, it will not be about faith, but about you, because faith does not replace either mind or education. In the absence of a number of morally specific qualities, believers have a strange sense of superiority over atheists, bordering obscurantism. The bottom line is that they a priori suspect an atheist of the capacity for any bloody crime, on the sole basis that "they have no sense of sin." From this comes all the slander, including yours. But who gave you the right to privatize this feeling if the concept of sin was known thousands of years before Christianity? Who gave you the right to privatize ordinary human qualities, such as compassion (and even animals have it), justice, and conscience? And lie, lie and slander? Yes, and then the Moral Code from the Commandments is copied ... - but who claims so vilely that they did not see these documents in person.
                Lenin, two weeks before the February Revolution, in conversations with students, arguing about the inevitability of the revolution (and this follows from the dialectic), regretted that his generation would not see it anymore, since there were no conditions for it, and it would lie on your shoulders - young. So, what don’t have to be done from Lenin’s down, but he really always moved purposefully, but where are the goals that are unknown to you so far. Take it for granted.
                In his work “On the Slogan of the United Europe” (1915), Lenin (contrary to Marx) substantiated the possibility of building socialism in several countries or even in one single country. Notice, this is about construction, not about destruction. On this, at one time Trotsky wanted to play, trying to remove him from power, accusing him of revisionism. I hope you are not a Trotskyist? Power was taken peacefully, here yours always didn’t agree on two or two, you’re definitely a guide, at least in agitation. A peaceful construction of a new life was supposed, but a bloody reaction began under the leadership of the West. Yes, it's me, you don’t even know where and when the civil war broke out (July-August 1917), not to discuss the terror of green-white-red with you. So take the advice that I gave to the previous opponent and ..., as Vladimir Ilyich bequeathed, - to study, study and study again.
          3. satris
            satris 11 February 2019 19: 23
            0
            who did everything to destroy the Russian empire.

            Really controversial.
            Only Poland and Finland have fallen off. The rest is left.
      2. Sinbad
        Sinbad 13 March 2018 00: 42
        +2
        Above this garbage sarcophagus must be placed, abruptly Chernobyl, that would never have escaped!
        1. V. Salama
          V. Salama 13 March 2018 16: 48
          +2
          Quote: Sinbad
          .... that would never break out!

          And what is there that can break out? winked
          If this is what bit you, then this "grass" must be bought elsewhere. wassat
          And if this is something that, in principle, can bother you because of your worldview and socio-political position, then the sarcophagus will have to be placed over libraries and living people, and not only our country laughing Here it will be necessary to change the attending physician yes definitely.
        2. V. Salama
          V. Salama April 2 2018 16: 33
          0
          Quote: Sinbad
          Above this garbage sarcophagus must be placed, abruptly Chernobyl, that would never have escaped!

          Andrei, maybe I didn’t understand what it was about the Mausoleum or the Yeltsin Center?
          1. Sinbad
            Sinbad April 3 2018 00: 34
            +1
            Of course about the Yeltsin center!
            1. V. Salama
              V. Salama April 3 2018 15: 16
              +1
              Quote: Sinbad
              Of course about the Yeltsin center!

              Sorry brother! In vain I ran into you. Then one made a hint at the mausoleum, but I, under the influence of the dispute, showed inattention, took it to another account regarding the sarcophagus. And then I didn’t learn how to read arrows, how to determine which post they are directed to?
      3. Vladimir 23rus
        Vladimir 23rus 18 March 2018 05: 23
        +1
        You don’t need to spit there, but come with an excavator and flatten everything
        Why align! Make in there the largest public toilet in Europe (the world?) !!!
        1. roma1doma
          roma1doma 12 February 2019 11: 05
          0
          It is more logical to make the world's largest sobering station there! Or the World Center to Combat Alcoholism :)
    5. Dead duck
      Dead duck 12 March 2018 14: 32
      +9
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Thanks again to Yeltsin.

      You won’t believe it, but in those years, almost everywhere, where people (not ours, of course) needed to sit or "hang out" from behind a hill ...
      much was taken out for free or for a penny ...
    6. Kent0001
      Kent0001 12 March 2018 14: 55
      +4
      Their Americans simply did not return from the exhibition, I had to sell it, in my opinion it was so. "Lapotnaya" Russia has always paid "exceptional", we can and this time they will understand that they were made and will not bite the bit.
    7. Mikhail Zubkov
      Mikhail Zubkov 12 March 2018 15: 46
      +6
      And what if in Yeltsinium itself regularly spoil? To assemble a diarrheal team with inquiries from gastroenterologists - and crap on command and in heaps? Season with vomit too - yogis have such an exercise in self-cleaning of the stomach and intestines. It is possible to exercise bowel movements on the traitor’s grave. And then Nainu Io is promoted on our TV as the heroine of the era, and not as the widow of a traitor and not as the mother of a thief.
    8. V. Salama
      V. Salama 12 March 2018 16: 34
      +9
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      In 1992, the two remaining copies of the Topaz series small-sized reactors were sold in the US for $ 13 million.
      Did not know. request ...

      Similarly, this is not surprising, since it is unlikely that such a dirty trick would be covered in the media, even at that dirty time. But in my memory, the scandal of the past years, which was already after this sale, namely: at one of the international exhibitions in the USA, our small-sized nuclear power plants for space were demonstrated. But when at the end of the exhibition it was time to return the exhibits to the Russian Federation, the Americans arrested the reactor without a clear explanation of the reasons. In the media, they went awry for some time and everything died down - what kind of reactor they gave, what characteristics they gave, they did not give silence, or I banally missed the info, well, it seemed too quiet. If anyone is in the know, enlighten, please.
    9. AIR
      AIR 13 March 2018 19: 35
      +4
      Pancake!!! And I specially visited that shameful den of lies of Yeltsinoids. He left, did not leave a review. Now I'm sorry. I would know that this passed our development to the enemy, so I would have screamed at his monument with relish !!!
    10. Shaska
      Shaska 15 March 2018 07: 21
      +4
      Damn, take me with you !!! I'm still pumping under the door ... lol And I’ll put a flower ... love From Russians with love !!! wassat
  3. Cherry Nine
    Cherry Nine 12 March 2018 07: 13
    +10
    Is Mr. Kaptsov now a nuclear power specialist?
    1. Professor
      Professor 12 March 2018 07: 15
      +36
      Quote: Cherry Nine
      Is Mr. Kaptsov now a nuclear power specialist?

      Do not quibble. The article is interesting and I plusanul it. good
      1. Ingvar 72
        Ingvar 72 12 March 2018 07: 34
        +25
        Quote: Professor
        Do not quibble. The article is interesting and I plusanul it.

        Professor - the second time I see you have an adequate comment! good Are you getting better? wassat
        1. Phoenix_L'vov
          Phoenix_L'vov 12 March 2018 09: 01
          +5
          When your enemies praise you, think - is everything going well? Obviously, since they praise you, then everything goes well for them.
        2. Operator
          Operator 12 March 2018 15: 32
          +2
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          Professor - the second time I see you have an adequate comment

          “Sarmat”, “Vanguard”, “Status-6”, “Dagger” and NQR laughing
      2. Phoenix_L'vov
        Phoenix_L'vov 12 March 2018 09: 00
        +3
        Kaptsov’s order is not good for good people!
        1. Dead duck
          Dead duck 12 March 2018 14: 35
          +7
          Quote: Phoenix_Lvov
          Kaptsov’s order is not good for good people!

          sometimes sensible even enemies can talk (do) ...
          not to mention those with whom we disagree yes
          1. Baikal
            Baikal 12 March 2018 18: 11
            0
            Well, you know. Kaptsov - not Gridasov, and then bread laughing
            1. Days
              Days 14 March 2018 00: 34
              +2
              But Kaptsov didn’t go far from him - he switches between themes just as slippery. The only difference is that Kaptsov’s schizophasia is deliberate and deliberate (after all, everyone makes money in different ways. Kaptsov out with articles with propaganda and lack of truth).
  4. Romario_Argo
    Romario_Argo 12 March 2018 07: 58
    +12
    what does a nuclear reactor, a ramjet engine with built-in fuel rods from a nuclear reactor mean completely different things (!) Kaptsov risks ending up like Nemtsov if he continues to receive a salary at the American embassy (!) "Kaptsov Plaza - it sounds"
    custom article
    1. Romario_Argo
      Romario_Argo 12 March 2018 08: 27
      +4
      Kaptsov did not write a word depleted uranium which applies in fast neutron reactors and shells
      1. V. Salama
        V. Salama 12 March 2018 17: 15
        0
        Quote: Romario_Argo
        Kaptsov did not write a word depleted uranium which applies in fast neutron reactors and shells

        And why was it necessary to write about the depleted? In shells, yes it is used so that it is not too expensive, due to the excess of the required damaging effect. And in fast neutron reactors, uranium is used, which is not divided by thermal neutrons - 238 (EMNIP).
        1. Romario_Argo
          Romario_Argo 12 March 2018 17: 35
          0
          U-238 is absolutely true but (!) depleted, and in what "place" does it fonit, especially from a height of 40 km on 20M? (next. see fuel assemblies and fuel elements - the next debriefing)
          1. meGrail
            meGrail 13 March 2018 11: 14
            0
            He is not a phonite, but short-lived isotopes formed as a result of the reaction. You can touch new TVELs with your hands, but those that are "burnt out", those that you got out of the reactor - this will melt your hand /
          2. V. Salama
            V. Salama 13 March 2018 16: 15
            +1
            Quote: Romario_Argo
            absolutely true U-238 but (!) depleted, ...

            I am not a specialist in reactors, but I believed that the "degree of depletion" of nuclear fuel is always manipulated based on the dimensions of the installation and the required power of energy release.
            Quote: Romario_Argo
            and in what “place" does it fonit, especially from a height of 40 km to 20M?

            A working nuclear power plant always fonits due to the occurrence of a nuclear reaction, for stationary installations this is not essential, since the weight of physical protection does not play any role, and for unmanned aerial vehicles such protection is necessary only for radio electronics elements, for ground objects due to the large distance to them, such protection also not required. Here, the only problem, in my opinion, is the release of nuclear reaction products into the environment during the flight to the target, since this is not a nuclear power plant, but a nuclear engine. The question is, do existing technologies provide the creation of nuclear-powered engines with the necessary power of energy release (in temperature) to ensure the required engine thrust, without the release of nuclear reaction products into the atmosphere or not? If not, then this is a problem that should not be ignored, since there are dangers of contamination of the environment and, not so much of a radiation nature as a chemical, which is much more dangerous in various respects.
    2. K.A.S.
      K.A.S. 12 March 2018 08: 44
      +18
      In Soviet times, atomic engines were often written in the “youth technique” as “science and life,” etc. So, given the development of science, anything can happen!
      Remember a few months ago in Europe they sounded the alarm about radiation from the Russian Federation, and could not determine the place where the leak occurred. Maybe the rocket flew?
      Article plus set
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. Sverdlov
      Sverdlov 12 March 2018 10: 31
      +10
      https://im0-tub-ru.yandex.net/i?id=c3f50b4970992f
      f2c3733c3171f5308a&n=13

      The trickiest thing about these perversions is the laws of physics that no one has canceled and cannot cancel. To tell the pepelatsu a momentum of motion capable of moving it with cosmic speed, you must either increase the speed or increase the mass of the discarded body. Give formulas for downs laziness. The German is right ....
      1. DimerVladimer
        DimerVladimer 12 March 2018 14: 40
        +1
        Quote: Sverdlov
        The trickiest thing about these perversions is the laws of physics that no one has canceled and cannot cancel. To tell the pepelatsu a momentum of motion capable of moving it with cosmic speed, you must either increase the speed or increase the mass of the discarded body. Give formulas for downs laziness. The German is right ....


        In general, there is still a variable speed - higher velocity of the outflow of gases - higher momentum - the mass is not changed.
        1. saturn.mmm
          saturn.mmm 12 March 2018 18: 24
          0
          Quote: DimerVladimer
          higher velocity of the outflow of gases - higher momentum - the mass is not changed.

          Quote: Sverdlov
          or increase the mass of the discarded body.
          Sverdlov increases the mass of the discarded body, the discarded body is gases, and the higher the outflow of gases, the greater the mass of the discarded body.
      2. Kent0001
        Kent0001 12 March 2018 15: 03
        +5
        I taught a physics teacher in class 10 (commercial year 1989 or 1990) a space atomic engine based on the principle of microexplosions in a closed volume (Sphere) and pulsed discharge of products into open space through a nozzle with a high-frequency valve. He even considered something according to the law of conservation of momentum, taking into account the weight of uranium atoms and their total number when dividing with the minimum weight of the substance necessary for the reaction .... so he still recalls this topic like Hochma when meeting ...., but you and the implemented topic using a nuclear reactor. Keep it up guys.
        1. V. Salama
          V. Salama 12 March 2018 19: 19
          +2
          Quote: Kent0001
          I taught a physics teacher in class 10 (commercial year 1989 or 1990) a space atomic engine based on the principle of microexplosions in a closed volume (Sphere) and pulsed discharge of products into open space through a nozzle with a high-frequency valve.
          ...

          Yes, for sure, I read about it (the year of commercials 1974 or 1975) in the journal "Technique of Youth" yes the truth about the valve did not say anything there, it had to be patented for sure laughing keep it up, pasaremos drinks
        2. DimerVladimer
          DimerVladimer 13 March 2018 10: 00
          +3
          Quote: Kent0001
          A physics teacher in class 10 (commercial year 1989 or 1990) was offered a space atomic engine based on the principle of microexplosions in a closed volume (Sphere) and pulsed discharge of products into open space through a nozzle with a high-frequency valve.


          Ripples of powerful rocket engines - the scourge of rocket science.
          They lead to the destruction of the structure.
          How many fought with the seven in the transition to manned flights, in order to smooth out the pulsations of the engines, so that the vibration would not kill the astronauts.
          And you are micronuclear explosions ...
          How many Americans struggled with the pulsation problem of the F-1 rocket engine for the first stage of Saturn-V
          These partitions in the combustion chamber of the F-1 (Rocketdyne) liquid propellant rocket engine helped prevent pulsations - more stable operation of powerful single-chamber liquid propellant rocket engines,


          In general, ripples are not good for the design. They lead to an increase in peak loads and, consequently, to an increase in safety margins - a heavier structure. Fast fatigue wear.
          An example - helicopters - a bunch of vibrations from different sources.
        3. Ingvar_1970
          Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 00: 37
          0
          In the early 80s or late 70s, the British proposed this principle for accelerating vehicles to speeds comparable to the speed of light. True, it was necessary to use all the warheads of the planet and rivet new ones, apparently that's why it did not go.
      3. V. Salama
        V. Salama 12 March 2018 17: 35
        +1
        Quote: Sverdlov
        ..... To tell the pepelatsu a momentum of motion capable of moving it with cosmic speed, you must either increase the speed or increase the mass of the discarded body. Give formulas for downs laziness. The German is right ....

        Well, not everything is so simple, since it is not about flying in space, but in the atmosphere, where there is enough mass for a directly accurate engine. Theoretically feasible, the question is in the technology of implementing the idea and at what stage everything is. Here, on one of the pages of VO, it is too lazy to look for (one of Putin’s Dagger, EMNIP) one of the comrades allegedly involved in the trials, modestly surprised at the Status (an underwater drone) that they say that they’re not even ready to stand, but are already promoting. Who can you believe now? Just took note ...
      4. cats
        cats 13 March 2018 09: 48
        +2
        Quote: Sverdlov
        Give formulas for downs laziness. The German is right ..

        Imagine how down you seem, the developer of this device,
        if he accidentally stopped by to read that heresy that you were squeezing out of yourself ..
    2. vlad007
      vlad007 12 March 2018 11: 53
      +3
      Quote: Geksagena
      The author of the lowest grade clown! He cites the words of the German "specialist" of a country that does not have space, and nuclear technology.

      In Europe there is the European Atomic Energy Community and the European Space Agency. The budget of the European Space Agency for 2016 amounted to 5,25 billion EUR or $ 5,71 billion USD !!!. The budget of Roscosmos in the 2016 year is 104 billion. RUBLES !!!!
      1. Sinbad
        Sinbad 13 March 2018 00: 47
        +1
        They're cutting it cool, and they are also nodding at us.
      2. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 00: 40
        0
        Despite the small budget, the lion's share of new elementary particles was discovered by our scientists and not all by the large collider. We now have 2, and 3 should be under construction.
    3. vlad_vlad
      vlad_vlad 12 March 2018 12: 24
      +5
      Quote: Geksagena
      ... He cites the words of the German "specialist" of a country that does not have space, and nuclear technology. ...


      from Werner Braun to Ariana Space and the OCH, from Heisenberg to Siemens (until recently, one of the 3 largest manufacturers of nuclear reactors) - this is all from Germany.

      quickly to school, and mom do not say that quietly rummaging on the Internet.

      and if on the topic, then the article is strange, the facts contradict the conclusions. if this crap is a hundred years old at lunch, then flying Chernobyl and how to test it - what is the breakthrough ??
      1. cats
        cats 13 March 2018 09: 53
        +2
        Quote: vlad_vlad
        and if on the topic, then the article is strange, the facts contradict the conclusions. if this crap is a hundred years old at lunch, then flying Chernobyl and how to test it - what is the breakthrough ??

        The breakthrough is that if the Germans do not begin to think, then such Chernobyl will fall on their heads.
        But in general, the Germans always thought tightly about what it was that they Russian sipped ..
  6. Darkesstcat
    Darkesstcat 12 March 2018 09: 36
    +1
    Well, she would have flown over Los Angeles, they would have simply stated that an accident at a nuclear power plant had occurred.
  7. sevtrash
    sevtrash 12 March 2018 09: 45
    +6
    The main thing is that the new weapons systems level out the prospects of the missile defense practically created by the Americans. Surely the Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA and others like them were and are aware of the developments, in fact the most logical for Russia was to develop new options for delivery vehicles. Well, what was the United States doing? Refuse missile defense? It makes no sense, missile defense is still important for leveling a significant part of the threats, at least in terms of the development of interception systems, radars, missiles, including new ones. Surely, they probably already have some kind of experience on the PRO-2 type, more likely a theoretical plan.
    It’s another matter for the general public (in other words, biomass, as one politician puts it) and missile defense, as it were, didn’t exist, but now that same public may ask a question - what’s the matter, what kind of noise and new threat? And politicians will have to explain something and do something, such as agreeing. What was it all about.
    1. KERMET
      KERMET 12 March 2018 10: 24
      +4
      "... Unlike the mystical Pluto, originally from the 1950s, the modern nuclear missile project, voiced by V. Putin, proposes the creation of an effective means to break through the American missile defense system ..."
      Is it possible in more detail than it is more effective then? Keeping this on alert is more hemorrhoids for the owner of this weapon than for his potential adversary
      1. Sverdlov
        Sverdlov 12 March 2018 10: 54
        +13
        Calm down already. There is no such weapon. The laws of physics cannot be deceived. This is all the election campaign. I’m going there, for the first time in 65 years, I won’t go ...
        1. Korax71
          Korax71 12 March 2018 13: 50
          +8
          No, you are all-inclusive! the guarantor is NEVER fooling! it means the laws of physics for Russia have been specifically changed. you are not aware that we even have a different physiology! the water in the river is knee-deep, and the fish are ..... short to ears laughing but the fact that you do not go to the polls is sad recourse give your vote, the bill has already been printed for you, which will prevent someone from entering your last name with passport data into it, putting a squiggle and a cross where necessary? sad
          1. Pingo
            Pingo 12 March 2018 14: 09
            0
            what will prevent you from rewriting this piece of paper as you want?
            and does the surname and passport data fit into it?
            1. businessv
              businessv 12 March 2018 15: 49
              0
              Quote: Pingo
              and does the surname and passport data fit into it?

              Of course, data is written in the spine of the newsletter, and the newsletter comes off and is given to you. From that moment on, it’s already not clear whose. Although, if you set a goal, then by applying the ballot to the spine, you can calculate the voter! This is a joke, friends, about the application, liberals, do not get excited! hi
              1. AUL
                AUL 12 March 2018 18: 36
                +1
                Quote: businessv
                Although, if you set a goal, then by applying the ballot to the spine, you can calculate the voter! This is a joke, friends, about the application, liberals, do not get excited!

                In every joke ... Do you think there are few technical ways to tie a ballot to a spine? On the fly, three things crossed my mind!
              2. Pingo
                Pingo 12 March 2018 23: 05
                0
                it doesn’t fit into the piece of paper (which they called the bluetooth) and then do whatever you want with it
            2. Korax71
              Korax71 12 March 2018 16: 03
              +1
              Yes, especially, of course, even a piece of paper filled by you. It will simply create at least small but complex laughing Well, this is at least some kind of life position.
              1. Pingo
                Pingo 12 March 2018 23: 02
                0
                position not to play with cheaters and not to participate in someone else’s circus clown
        2. cats
          cats 13 March 2018 09: 56
          +3
          Quote: Sverdlov
          I’m going there, for the first time in 65 years, I won’t go ...

          That is, you are at least 80 years old?
          Quote: Sverdlov
          Calm down already. There is no such weapon. The laws of physics cannot be deceived. This is all the election campaign.

          And in 80 years, the mind hasn’t accumulated?
      2. Sewer krainiy
        Sewer krainiy 12 March 2018 13: 44
        +2
        Is it possible in more detail than it is more effective then? Keeping this on alert is more hemorrhoids for the owner of this weapon than for his potential adversary
        Sorry, you have passwords, appearances, cards ... drawings and schemes ... wink laughing laughing hi
        1. Pingo
          Pingo 12 March 2018 14: 22
          0
          just guys in the pose of one flightless bird.
      3. cats
        cats 13 March 2018 10: 00
        +2
        Quote: KERMET
        Is it possible in more detail than it is more effective then?

        You can. But I think then you have to kill.
        Quote: KERMET
        Keeping this on alert is more hemorrhoids for the owner of this weapon than for his potential adversary

        So you decide, know what it is about, or come up with and doubt ..
  8. Razvedka_Boem
    Razvedka_Boem 12 March 2018 10: 05
    +6
    “Status 6” will take several days to get to the US coast

    Or maybe on the border of coastal waters already lie at the bottom, waiting for the hour "X"? ..
    Even if this is not so, I’m sure of surprises, consider the United States attacking Russia, there are many in store.
    1. freejack
      freejack 12 March 2018 14: 49
      +7
      Or maybe on the border of coastal waters already lie at the bottom, waiting for an hour "X"?

      Maybe so ... Only somehow everyone forgot that more than 40 (!) Years ago we had a Flurry torpedo at a speed of about 400 km / h ....
      If two "statuses" will patrol the quiet places of the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean at a distance of 3000 km from the state coast, then such a multi-megaton class super torpedo will find the coast of America in 8 hours !!! What days is the author raving about ???
      And the fact that the torpedo has no connection (it goes in the air bubble) I don’t see big problems is not a high-precision thing ... She doesn’t need to get into the adversary’s ship, but into the North American continent. I think that in 40 years this problem has probably been solved! hi
      1. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 00: 50
        0
        In the new unit, it’s like a warhead with cobalt or something else there, so that for centuries it’ll rub everything around. His task is not to cut a piece, but to make life impossible on a vast territory, where accuracy is special and unnecessary.
      2. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 00: 52
        0
        And our partners refused to create analogues of a flurry, they say inaccurate. Apparently they need the drawings all the same. The Chinese seem to have even washed down.
    2. faradien
      faradien 13 March 2018 01: 45
      0
      In fact, the "Status" is declared as a multi-purpose unmanned system. And this may be patrolling in a given area in anticipation of a command, and remote mining, and sabotage operations, and even the possible pursuit of the enemy’s nuclear submarines ... How many states do the submarines have? For each, let’s say, a pair of them, and let them go after them. It will be difficult to “run away” from them, and they will find it later ... We don’t know what kind of equipment they will stand for ... Perhaps this is also possible ... Well, theoretically ... Dozens of “Statuses” will be needed then but they are much cheaper than full-fledged submarines. And what a task then is being solved! It would be worth it what fellow
  9. gridasov
    gridasov 12 March 2018 10: 44
    +3
    Obviously, we have to repeat again and again that it is not enough to talk about the scattered heat or energy release. It is necessary to talk about the concentration of this energy release in the necessary sections of the reactor, so that later this energy could be transformed into its new form. All this is not in modern nuclear engines. Moreover, the use of NRE eliminates all its advantages since either the flow interacts with the medium as the reactive kinetic energy of the flow or through the propulsor, but also the flow flow. Moreover, there is completely no understanding of why and how to get rid of the acoustic explosive impulse when overcoming supersonic sound. Therefore, talk about the practical application of NRE is very premature.
    It is worth noting that the same NRE can also be created on completely radioactive materials if technologies are used to process the formation of ultrahigh-directional emfs on the discharge surfaces. Then all the positive effects of the radioactive, but scattered radiation of the material will not only be in a concentrated form, but will also be in one device and not separately in the reactor and turbine separately.
    To overcome supersonic thresholds without an acoustic impulse, you just need to convert the potential energy of air or water into the work of the stream, which will be converted into a spin vector. That is, at this moment La will acquire an even greater impulse of acceleration. The theoretical basis for this conclusion is that, for example, a radial flow pressure drop occurs in the Laval nozzle. However, there is a more advanced device in which the flow can be radically impulse accelerated without such a pressure drop. And this technology is applicable to any flight objects in the air or in the environment of water or space.
    1. Mimoprohodil
      Mimoprohodil 12 March 2018 11: 25
      +2
      What kind of stream of consciousness is like schizophrenia
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 12 March 2018 11: 47
        +7
        So pass by. Not for you .
    2. Falcon5555
      Falcon5555 12 March 2018 21: 18
      +2
      Monsieur Gridasov, well, when will we see your NRE (without nuclear materials)? Are you ready to assemble it?
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 13 March 2018 18: 48
        +1
        Remember how in a joke. The plumber came to repair the faucet at the client. He looks at the catastrophe of leaky water from a broken connection and says that the work will cost one hundred dollars. The client tells him, do it. Fitter bam and did the work in five minutes. The client asks what it takes so dearly for such a quick job. Locksmith to him, and I take money not for work, but for the fact that I know how to do everything.
        So you, along with dozens of research institutes, will be dealing with issues that I have already justified and spend a lot of money for dozens of years. And then do not think that everything is so simple and affordable. I didn’t even make close contact with those who want and can get a “prize”, and this will be a very long and time-stretched period. By the way, thank you for not forgetting me and all the time warm up communication with taunting jokes. Keep on people like it. And help me
        1. Falcon5555
          Falcon5555 13 March 2018 22: 52
          +1
          warm up communication with prickly mockery.
          Yes, what are you, what are you ... how can you ?! That's where you saw the "sticky" ... "mockery" ... in my previous post? I just can’t imagine modestly, more modestly, inquired whether you are ready to assemble a nuclear engine without nuclear materials? You can suspect here, but not "mockery" and not "stabbing", but easy and harmless humor, only if you yourself do not believe that this is possible. But you write that this is possible? Or do you yourself not believe what you write?
          1. gridasov
            gridasov 14 March 2018 00: 18
            +1
            Okay! The question, after all, boils down to how to create a directed emf in a simple solid or the same radioactive material. At the same time, both the voltage and current strength will be so high that it is very difficult to do this in the technology of external energy supply. But here by a simple method through exposure to these substances hydro-gas-dynamic flow, this is done quite simply. And if you cannot imagine how to do this, then alas. And what will happen when such a design works. The same thing will happen as when using radioactive material, as simple. The only question is the rate of flow of the ionization of the outflow surface. The process of thermionic emission of the material in the medium of cavitating liquid or air will occur. If you understand, then this is an engine in which the temperature in the combustion chamber is such that no modern fuel can provide the same. In this case, not the entire surface of the outflow, but its most intense place, will be the active catalyst. Naturally, water or air containing water vapor will be the fuel that creates the waste of the masses. So much for the detonation engine combined with the propulsion and, at the same time, an ultrahigh alternating magnetic field generator. Of course I miss the subtleties. I have the right. But it is already a fact that it is possible to create an EMF in any material and also incredibly powerful. Such a device, I think, can be created in garage conditions. However, I am frightened by some points that I have already encountered. With an inaccurate approach in the plane of expansion and the use of inappropriate materials, the kinetic energy is such that the foam parts pierced a board removed two meters away. Well, that was in the early stages. Now I think everything will be serious.
            It is impossible not to believe in this because my task was only to select algorithms for the sequence of all stages, which as private experiments on the Internet can always be seen as evidence. Analysis do you know the tool is serious.
            1. gridasov
              gridasov 14 March 2018 00: 43
              +2
              What is the fundamental nature of our development. The fact is that by controlling only mechanical speed, firstly, the thresholds of centrifugal failure of even the most resistant materials can be overcome. In general, to get away from the mathematical and real dependence of the fact that an increase in the speed of rotation and radius approximates the thresholds of destruction. Secondly, our device does not have pressure drops in the moving flow at any speed. Thirdly, only a change in the rotor speed affects what we want to use this device as a generator or propulsion device or, together, this and that plus a reactor. Imagine that if Koldamosov created his device only as proof of the physical effect of sonoluminescence of water, then we embodied this effect in a specific application and, most importantly, in the possibility of transforming this effect as a process into the next stages of its use, be it the same process in an ion engine or simple an aircraft engine or propulsion device for ships and submarines or a generator of thermal energy. And this is not a perpetual motion machine, but a system, just in a new way, of the stages of transformation of kinetic and potential energy of hydro-gas-dynamic flow constructed.
              1. Falcon5555
                Falcon5555 14 March 2018 20: 08
                +1
                I read your answers from top to bottom, from bottom to top, from right to left, diagonally from top to bottom, to the right and in the opposite direction, but I never saw a single answer to my questions. sad The only thing that somehow relates to the last question of whether you believe in what you write is a phrase that I could hardly catch closer to the end of the previous post: "You can’t believe this, because my task was only to select the algorithms "but I find it difficult to determine what it means. On the one hand, it seems impossible not to believe, but maybe you are doing it all the same, what is impossible and don’t believe? "Believe it or not?" - "However, some moments scare me ... my task was only in the selection of algorithms" ... What algorithms? What are the moments? Have a question about algorithms? belay
                1. gridasov
                  gridasov 14 March 2018 20: 49
                  +1
                  Well, not yours! Not yours! If you yourself do not understand what radioactivity is in elementary terms, then you will not understand that these same properties are identical to when any material is in the dynamics and in the stream creating ionization. If it’s difficult for you to understand that the algorithm for changing physical states is the stages of a consistent transformation of the basic properties of a substance or body, then all my efforts are useless, and then, I won’t openly talk about such things, which is extremely important especially in the current situation in Russia. No offense, but I'm not a teacher at school to explain all the details. Although of course it would be clearer in the sketches
                  1. Falcon5555
                    Falcon5555 14 March 2018 22: 34
                    +1
                    And what, in fact, is “not yours”? I even have the suspicion that you are trying to be rude to me. But this is very harmful, especially for you. Here I am as polite as an angel. If I still do not have a luminous circle above my head and wings, then they may appear soon. The back is already itching. laughing Focus on “ours,” on the questions I asked you. No need to ride like a flea in a pan. Read these questions in words, or even in letters.
                    1. gridasov
                      gridasov 15 March 2018 12: 18
                      +1
                      In no way trying to be rude. Moreover, I apologize if this seemed to you. It's just that I am powerless to clarify the situation with the potential of my capabilities that I use.
                      I understood all your questions. But get me right. that any intelligible explanation can be based on the fact that I must identify and correlate your associations with the examples by which I can justify my arguments so that you can understand. But how to do this if I need to give explanations at the same time in which analysis method I need to consider complex processes and at the same time give answers on the design and on the processes that occur in this device. At the same time, it is obvious to everyone, and you and I should take into account that such a topic is extremely interesting for the powers that be, you need to say everything openly so that only we understand it. So I’m ready to explain, but only in those conditions where those aspects of which I speak are respected. Therefore, I’m ready to apologize a thousand times for my inability to solve this problem.
                      I read my expositions and see that I have written quite clearly and clearly and to the best of my ability.
                      Let me once again only repeat that it is important to understand that radioactivity is scattered radiation, if simple. If someone agrees with this, it means that only this scattered radiation can be used in those technologies that are known. What is scattered radiation is obviously not necessary. However, when we talk about the possibility of concentrating the entire intranuclear potential of a radioactive material at one point, we must understand how to create a potential in the dimension of a certain level and shape of the material in such a way that it can be extracted. Since this radioactive material is also functional and is the surface of the outflow in a highly dynamic flow of either air or water or mercury, etc., we not only increase the concentration of energy in the reactor, but also make it safe. But the main thing becomes obvious that instead of radioactive material, any material can be used at all, and the level of its internal potential energy can only be regulated by the surface ionization flow rate. Everything is very simple . Then, in fact, a nuclear reactor is used as a propulsion device that works on the movement of mobile media, but also a generator of an alternating magnetic field, etc.
                      1. Falcon5555
                        Falcon5555 15 March 2018 20: 55
                        +1
                        I am very glad that it only seemed to me. But, however, what does it mean to “clarify the situation with potential” and continue throughout the text to the very end? My basic questions were very simple and I still don’t see the answers: "Monsieur Gridasov, well, when will we see your NRE (without nuclear materials)? Are you ready to assemble it?" So when? Answer Options:
                        and tomorrow
                        b) by the end of the year
                        c) in 2020
                        d) in another specific year
                        d) I do not know
                        e) I know, but I will not say
                        g) never.
    3. Sinbad
      Sinbad 13 March 2018 00: 54
      0
      I can’t say that I know everything. And do I know at all. But, the creation of the new is the denial of the old, based on his old experience. We are trying to talk about the possibility of this or that, but our experience and our knowledge are out of date. It is necessary to accept the new as a given and reconcile with its limitations until the new one "enters school textbooks."
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 13 March 2018 11: 10
        +1
        Personally, I am preaching something else. Any events of any time is a complex of events. Our experience speaks of certain algorithms for perceiving this experience in accordance with the circumstances that we considered. New knowledge is a complex of the same circumstances but in new interaction algorithms and relatively new tasks and goals. Therefore, nothing needs to be broken. You just need to re-examine the situation and the knowledge that we are able to manipulate to expand perception. In general, this fits into the mathematics of analysis, not the mathematics of calculations. Here, of course, fundamentally new outgoing or introductory ones were needed, namely, those new properties of the number, as a foundation, in order for mathematics to consider science itself in new problems and methods of its use
  10. tchoni
    tchoni 12 March 2018 10: 48
    +2
    It is not even clear what this article is about ... The author gives an epic seed and does not give any conclusions .... But, then, emotions ... emotions ..
    1. cats
      cats 13 March 2018 10: 01
      +2
      Quote: tchoni
      It is not even clear what this article is about ... The author gives an epic seed and does not give any conclusions .... But, then, emotions ... emotions ..

      So that's the calculation. Arrange srach. Now either giggles or rubs his hands.
  11. Sverdlov
    Sverdlov 12 March 2018 10: 48
    +4

    ABOUT! Selected loaded!
    Once again about love. The German is right. The laws of physics have not been canceled and cannot be canceled. To give a momentum of movement, it is necessary to throw back either a larger mass with a higher speed or air with a higher speed.
    In this fantasy, spaceships flew on water vapor ....
    1. Locksmith
      Locksmith 12 March 2018 12: 31
      +2
      Quote: Sverdlov
      The German is right. The laws of physics have not been canceled and cannot be canceled. To give a momentum of movement, it is necessary to throw back either a larger mass with a higher speed or air with a higher speed.

      Nobody really knows about the cruise missile, but the reactor can not be brought to extreme temperatures. If it is placed inside the turbojet engine to heat the incoming air, at least up to 1000 degrees, this will also increase the flight range due to fuel economy, because hydrocarbons burn mainly air nitrogen for a minute 78% wink And so we heat the compressed air, and turn the turbine on with fuel. The initial start by the accelerator, which is located inside the engine, at the same time heats up the stellarator, it goes into active mode from warming up - why not idea? laughing
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 12 March 2018 13: 38
        +1
        But it is much easier to introduce the entire air flow into a mode in which it becomes fuel. It is only necessary to change the process algorithms.
    2. lance
      lance 12 March 2018 17: 48
      0
      or all the same, gas with high T ° C at the initial stage and plasma in the subsequent?
    3. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 12 March 2018 18: 40
      0
      Quote: Sverdlov
      To give a momentum of movement, it is necessary to throw back either a larger mass with a higher speed or air with a higher speed.

      Air has mass.
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 12 March 2018 20: 47
        +1
        Air doesn't just have mass. It is elastic through atomic-molecular interactions, or rather magnetic processes. Because neither atoms nor molecules directly interact. Magnetic force flows interact. Therefore, the question is how this potential energy of magnetic interactions can be transformed into kinetic.
        It is a deep mistake to specifically heat the gas at the inlet. The transition period from the gala as an aggregate state to the plasma is very short and fast.
    4. cats
      cats 13 March 2018 10: 04
      +2
      Quote: Sverdlov
      In this fantasy, spaceships flew on water vapor ....

      Surely you have a car .. Turn around, buy yourself a donkey and a cart. Although the cart too
      probably when it was an incredible invention.
  12. Rey_ka
    Rey_ka 12 March 2018 10: 48
    +3
    the test of this weapon was monitored by the Norwegians and NATO A50 so that they are in the know and do not refute
    1. gridasov
      gridasov 12 March 2018 13: 40
      +1
      Who are they so that their conclusions are worthy of attention? They are simply outside observers and do not own any technologies that give them priority to their opinion.
      1. cats
        cats 13 March 2018 10: 07
        +2
        Quote: gridasov
        Who are they so that their findings are worthy of attention

        Listen better to Gridasov. lol
        No offense. Where do you get grass?
        1. gridasov
          gridasov 13 March 2018 11: 15
          +1
          Actually, it’s complete tactlessness to talk about such things. And by the way, I didn’t say it, but you. Therefore, you showed yourself simply as a person with whom you can dissemble and talk to him in such a way that he likes. But in this way you will never come into contact with what may be the identity of reality expressed in words . You do not understand me and it does not matter. You may ask for clarification, But you made a premature conclusion and personally I have no interest in continuing the dialogue.
          1. cats
            cats 13 March 2018 17: 12
            +2
            Quote: gridasov
            You do not understand me and it does not matter

            I think I'm not the only one down to earth who does not understand your
            intergalactic colloquial. Do not be offended, just when I
            I read and try to comprehend what I read, then I go to smoke a couple of times.
            hi
            1. gridasov
              gridasov 13 March 2018 18: 30
              +1
              I will clarify the situation. The question is not in you, but in me. Knowing my problems and understanding that I can’t step over them, and most importantly, that some issues of a scientific and technical order are generally unreceptible, and especially those that I mean, I just have to maintain the “sound of the melody” to reach those who topic. Of course, I'm not a philanthropist and I'm not interested in technology for individual use. I’m interested in interactions with the monopolists of the energy production market and of such important devices as aircraft engines, but including nuclear installations of a dynamic process, not a static process, when nuclear materials heat water and transform it into steam and then through a turbine into alternating magnetic fluxes generators. I’m talking about installations in which in one housing and in a single process you can use both a reactor and a turbine and a generator. And it’s obvious that the principles that are applied in the voiced NRE are completely sucks. Therefore, you, like many smart people, should understand that it is difficult for me to maintain a balance between what to say and what cannot be said. Many people are interested in the topic. And therefore, I just use the forum site not for "show off", but in order to get in touch with people who understand and realize the impossibility of solving theoretical problems in academic circles. Moreover, I am more interested in the issues of fundamental mathematics as a tool for analyzing super-large data. And since I already know that no one realizes what a function of a constant value of a number is, and only on this basis it is possible to build fundamentally new and non-computational systems of mathematical analysis, then believe that it is often convenient to look like a fool. Your statements only fuel interest in my monologues. Of course, few people enter into dialogue with me, if not to say, no one
              1. cats
                cats 13 March 2018 19: 08
                +2
                Quote: gridasov
                Of course, few people enter into dialogue with me, if not to say, no one

                Quote: gridasov
                And so I just use the forum site

                Probably not the best platform for finding an interlocutor on a topic about which
                most of us read in science fiction. I see it as trying to catch fish in an unfamiliar pond.
                Through hardship to the stars.. hi
                1. gridasov
                  gridasov 13 March 2018 19: 30
                  +2
                  Here I can very well rely on your suggestions. Where and what sites can be interesting for me. And then there is another reason for the convenience of the VO site. Such forums are always under the control of industrial intelligence. Here, even if you don’t hear specific secrets, you can always do an analysis of the weather in a particular topic. And indeed there are plenty of indirect conclusions.
                  I can even give an example of how Russia, for example, was taken away by a Dagestan scientist who applied the method of rotation of the oil flow in a pipeline. And hundreds of millions have already earned on this. And then I talked about the implementation of our developments in one Russian company and absolute zero. At the same time, they complain that they are being crushed from above to seek and implement innovations. In general, laughter and only if I did not want to cry after all
  13. Glory1974
    Glory1974 12 March 2018 10: 55
    +6
    Or communication methods with the “Status-6” underwater drone (fundamental problem: radio communication does not work underwater, during communication sessions submarines are forced to rise to the surface)

    Data is outdated. It is no longer necessary to come up for communication. The laws of physics are not violated, just the technology has advanced. With a nuclear engine, I think the same.
    1. Gary zucker
      Gary zucker 12 March 2018 15: 14
      +1
      Come on. Extra-long waves always didn't care about the skin effect. Since the end of the 80s, I remember a complex of antennas stretching hundreds of meters along the Gorky-Arzamas highway. And she’s standing there probably since the 50s. Now everything has been updated there, it is clearly not inactive.

      https://www.google.ru/maps/place/%D0%93%D0%BE%D0%
      BB%D0%B8%D0%B0%D1%84,+%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0
      %BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F/@56
      .1694533,43.9316304,3000m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1
      s0x414fd3636568c6e5:0xefbada1b801ae720!8m2!3d56.1
      71128! 4d43.9340016? Hl = en
      1. Vlad.by
        Vlad.by 12 March 2018 17: 19
        +1
        A similar antenna complex in Baranovichi.
        No one really hides that this is a communications complex with submarines ...
        You can not believe it, you can refer to the fact that this does not exist and can never happen, only here is the thought that "... What if they did it ...?" Firmly sat down and the hand to the Start button no longer reaches.
        And, probably, it won’t drag on for some time until it becomes clear whether it exists or not.
        And time now, in any case, works for Russia.
        Moreover, there is Sarmat, a dagger, a dagger, and Vanguard with a Mace about 7 years ago, it seems, was tested. Now brought to mind and the carrier and equipment.
        It is more likely to exist, but even if not, try to check ...
        1. karish
          karish 12 March 2018 17: 24
          +1
          Quote: Vlad.by
          A similar antenna complex in Baranovichi.
          No one really hides that this is a communications complex with submarines ...

          In Gantsevichi (I built it in 1987 - more precisely, I took part)
          Actually, as far as I know, this is a Volga radar station and has no connection with submarines
          1. Vlad.by
            Vlad.by 13 March 2018 00: 20
            0
            Apparently they were not building it. The Volga is a SPRN, and in Baranavichy, the moraeans go.
    2. lance
      lance 12 March 2018 17: 51
      0
      with water communication, too, the Arctic test of water communication as an example, and stable without interference.
  14. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 12 March 2018 11: 09
    +6
    Such crazy projects of “flying Chernobyls” are not power, but complete powerlessness.
    No different from: "we infect everyone with anthrax (or plague), even if we ourselves become infected."
    1. brigadir
      brigadir 12 March 2018 13: 08
      +5
      I still do not believe that there is even a prototype.
      All to the polls !!!
      1. freejack
        freejack 12 March 2018 14: 57
        +2
        not power, but complete powerlessness.

        I still do not believe that there is even a prototype.

        All that remains for you is to sit quietly, DO NOT believe and pray to your Judas ... am
        1. saturn.mmm
          saturn.mmm 12 March 2018 18: 49
          +2
          Quote: freejack
          DO NOT believe and pray to your Judas ..

          Of course, I wildly apologize, but if you are Orthodox then pray to the same god with them, and this is not Judas.
      2. Humpty
        Humpty 12 March 2018 14: 59
        +1
        Quote: brigadir
        I still do not believe that there is even a prototype.
        All to the polls !!!

        It touches that the Israelis on the forum are confident in the infallibility of their knowledge.
        If so, then correctly answer a simple question - can an ordinary plastic bucket take off without external influence? And if all the same it can, then under what conditions?
        This is much simpler than a compact reactor.
      3. Mikhail Zubkov
        Mikhail Zubkov 12 March 2018 16: 18
        +3
        For a long time, there are rocket fuels with impurities of metals, for example, aluminum. But it is lightweight, which reduces the reactive moment. Or explosive - in hexagen. And if it were heavy, like uranium, then the reactive moment would increase by a factor. This is chemistry with physics, and energy is needed to control the reaction - it is provided by a uranium nuclear reactor. According to the algorithm, everything is simple, but the specifics rests on supermaterials and control systems. Let's go to the polls!
    2. Operator
      Operator 12 March 2018 15: 39
      +3
      "Katz offers to surrender" (C) laughing
    3. Winnie76
      Winnie76 12 March 2018 16: 18
      +4
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Such crazy projects of “flying Chernobyls” are not power, but complete powerlessness.

      Warrior, do not worry. All rockets are cardboard laughing laughing laughing By the way, maybe Israel should abandon the insanely inhumane nuclear weapons that are not on your submarines?
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. cats
      cats 13 March 2018 10: 16
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Such crazy projects of “flying Chernobyls” are not power, but complete powerlessness.
      No different from: "we infect everyone with anthrax (or plague), even if we ourselves become infected."

      laughing Well, what are you .. And where is the "unbecoming" ..
      Apparently you know Russian well. winked
      There’s even brigadir wiping his sweaty palms, showing Jewish stamina,
      spiraling everything to the polls. lol
    6. Nikolaevich I
      Nikolaevich I 18 March 2018 02: 16
      +2
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Such crazy projects of “flying Chernobyls” are not power, but complete powerlessness.
      No different from: "we infect everyone with anthrax (or plague), even if we ourselves become infected."

      I don’t see the logic in your statement ... maybe this is the result of an inattentive “reading”? It was said that this device will be equipped only with nuclear warheads. In this version, it’s violet, will the rocket engine be environmentally friendly, or not ... wink
  15. Snakebyte
    Snakebyte 12 March 2018 11: 36
    +8
    Historical examples show that countries that have failed conventional arms programs have relied on miracle weapons.
    Suppose that all information about the new weapons is real, and this is not PR. At the moment, the Americans have nothing to fear. So far, only the laser complex and the "Dagger" are in the troops and in pilot operation. The first is a purely defensive weapon, the second has insufficient range to destroy targets in the United States.
    The remaining products are only in development, maximum at the initial stage of testing. It will take years, if not decades, for a sufficient number of new products to stand on alert.
    During this time, the Americans will develop countermeasures, their scientific and technical reserve is enormous. Or, in the worst case, they decide to neutralize the threat in the bud, suddenly discovering that there is no democracy in Russia. And most countries will support them, no one will want to wait until Status-6 gives them mass genocide.
    1. Sewer krainiy
      Sewer krainiy 12 March 2018 13: 58
      +4
      Or, in the worst case, they decide to neutralize the threat in the bud, suddenly discovering that there is no democracy in Russia. And most countries will support them, no one will want to wait until Status-6 gives them mass genocide.
      Well, okay, you do not regret us, take pity on yourself ... You need to negotiate hi
      1. Pingo
        Pingo 12 March 2018 14: 19
        +3
        Snakebyte - everything’s gone chef, the cast is removed, the client leaves .... laughing
    2. figwam
      figwam 12 March 2018 14: 23
      +2
      Snakebyte

      Wake up! except for Sarmat, everything has already been adopted and mass production has begun for delivery to the troops.
      1. Snakebyte
        Snakebyte 12 March 2018 15: 04
        +7
        Reread carefully the speech of the President.
        A dagger and a combat laser are what the troops already have, even in trial operation.
        Sarmat - trials are just coming.
        Vanguard - the tests are completed (it is strange that nothing was heard about it, because an object flying at a speed of 20 M in dense layers of the atmosphere should be surrounded by a cloud of high-temperature plasma, and at the heart of NATO missile defense there are satellites capable of detecting such infrared signatures), troops not yet. In principle, it can be considered its most immediate threat.
        Submarine - a nuclear power plant has been tested, the apparatus itself has only been developed, it still needs to be built and tested.
        Nuclear KR - a successful launch and a complex of ground tests were carried out, which "allow us to move on to the creation of a fundamentally new type of weapon - a strategic complex of nuclear weapons with a missile equipped with a nuclear power plant" - a verbatim quote.
        Total, 2 out of 6 exist only in cartoons, another 2 - in the process of testing or only completed them. 2 are in the army, but pose no threat to the United States.
        1. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by 12 March 2018 17: 55
          +4
          Even at the first launch of the Mace, Putin announced the presence of a hypersonic maneuvering BB. What year was that? 7? 10 or 15 years ago?
          And you can not hear, can not hear ...
          Then there was a prototype.
          Now, it seems, already serial crap all over the aggressive face.
          And where did you get such deep knowledge about the state of affairs with the listed devices? Are you from a close circle?
          Oh, look, they’re already following you, apparently ...
          1. Pingo
            Pingo 13 March 2018 00: 22
            +1
            Quote: Snakebyte
            During this time, the Americans will develop countermeasures, their scientific and technical reserve is enormous. Or, in the worst case, they decide to neutralize the threat in the bud, suddenly discovering that there is no democracy in Russia. And most countries will support them, no one will want to wait until Status-6 gives them mass genocide.

            yes, in the last paragraph of the common man broke
          2. Snakebyte
            Snakebyte 13 March 2018 09: 17
            +1
            Quote: Vlad.by
            And where did you get such deep knowledge about the state of affairs with the listed devices? Are you from a close circle?

            All data from the speech of the President. Everything is written there, for those who can read, and not just shout "cheers."
            I deliberately do not consider the possibility (quite real) that some part of these projects is simply a throw-in to make the intelligence services of the opponents fuss and light up their sources. A politician of this rank has the right to bluff.
            Or, that this is a regular election chatter. The coefficient by which campaign promises must be multiplied has long been known; it is 0.
            So to say, all pseudo-patriots will burn their chairs.
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 12 March 2018 20: 18
          +2
          All of them 6 out of 6 - in trial operation and on the verge of mass production.
        3. Arikkhab
          Arikkhab 15 March 2018 11: 10
          0
          Vanguard - the tests are completed (it is strange that nothing was heard about it, because an object flying at a speed of 20M in dense layers of the atmosphere should be surrounded by a cloud of high-temperature plasma, and at the heart of NATO missile defense there are satellites capable of detecting such infrared signatures)
          Then the Americans recently posted a video with a "UFO interception"
    3. saturn.mmm
      saturn.mmm 12 March 2018 18: 59
      +1
      Quote: Snakebyte
      Suppose that all information about the new weapons is real, and this is not PR. At the moment, the Americans have nothing to fear.

      Although someone reassured the Americans how you were upset for them, don’t be afraid the Americans have no weapons, no, no
      .
      Quote: Snakebyte
      Or, in the worst case, they decide to neutralize the threat in the bud, suddenly discovering that there is no democracy in Russia.

      Americans have long discovered that there is no democracy in Russia, they were supported by most countries, and so what?
      But what if Status already in the Gulf of Mexico is waiting in the wings? It turns out that you deceived them.
      1. Pingo
        Pingo 13 March 2018 01: 02
        0
        Will not understand. He forgot about the "Voivode", who had long been on duty.
        Quote: saturn.mmm
        But what if Status already in the Gulf of Mexico is waiting in the wings? It turns out that you deceived them.

        it’s better for them
    4. xtur
      xtur 17 March 2018 16: 22
      0
      > that countries that have failed conventional weapons programs rely on miraculous weapons.

      you need to change the training manual - all American cinema and cartoons are built on the same idea of ​​creating a superweapon or superpower with the help of science. So your criterion stands out first of all the USA
    5. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 01: 04
      0
      We seem to have even enough “tube” rockets so far to fight against human rights violations around the world if someone does not like our democracy.
  16. Old26
    Old26 12 March 2018 11: 51
    +9
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: Cherry Nine
    Is Mr. Kaptsov now a nuclear power specialist?

    Do not quibble. The article is interesting and I plusanul it. good

    So do I. Oleg, at least, is trying to ask questions, and is not “scolding” that everything, Khan America, and we will tear all.

    Quote: Geksagena
    The author of the lowest grade clown! He cites the words of the German "specialist" of a country that does not have space, and nuclear technology. Let me remind you that it was our country that first applied the atom in the energy sector, it was our country that first made the nuclear engine (NPP). I think we need to demonstrate it in the United States, since they say they are cartoons.

    Well, Germany just has nuclear technology, but the fact that there are no missiles is a pity, the ban on them is still valid. And what about the demonstration in the United States ... Ready to sacrifice such a demonstration for your loved ones? Or do you naively think that we will arrange a "Demonstration", but there will be no answer ??? Well then, you are either a naive person, or forgive the rude word - d.urak

    Quote: sevtrash
    The main thing is that new weapons systems offset the prospects of missile defense practically created by the Americans

    To be honest, missile defense is a scarecrow for the average man than a real weapon. Even without all these weapons, we broke through their missile defense at a time. In Alaska, they have only 44 interceptor missiles. The maximum that all these missiles can do is intercept 2-3 Voyevoda-type missiles. All .... But a bugaboo threat must exist. Otherwise, it will be impossible to keep your population in obedience ... And when there is an external enemy, and the enemy still has a super-duper weapon - the population will repeat everything as one that they will be let down from above

    Quote: KERMET
    "... Unlike the mystical Pluto, originally from the 1950s, the modern nuclear missile project, voiced by V. Putin, proposes the creation of an effective means to break through the American missile defense system ..."

    Actually, judging by all the drawings and photographs (possibly fake), this missile has a subsonic aerodynamic configuration. The only plus in the words of GDP is an unlimited range and unlimited time in the air. And if this is a subsonic product, knocking it down is not difficult, even without the help of missile defense.

    Quote: Rey_ka
    the test of this weapon was monitored by the Norwegians and NATO A50 so that they are in the know and do not refute

    But no one refutes the test. Test result? Where did this rocket fly? Or did it land on New Earth?
    1. Vlad.by
      Vlad.by 12 March 2018 18: 08
      +2
      You can also bring down the Moon from orbit.
      If there is anything.
      And a missile can also be shot down if it flies within the radar field, if it is detected and if air defense systems reach it at the required, specific moment in time. It may not even fly F-16 until the arrival of the Kyrgyz Republic to Norfolk, for example. Or he doesn’t have time to obscure her ... Or he doesn’t have time to shell her - this is certain death for a specific pilot. There are not many Sailors and Filipovs.
      And, in general, a lot if, don’t you?
      And when the missile reaches the continent beyond the puddle, of course it is possible to bring down it, but it’s already considered 90% fulfilled the BZ - it caused unacceptable losses (nuclear explosions, radioactive contamination of the territory, damage to electronics on a decent part of the territory, human losses, morale and etc. etc.)
      1. faradien
        faradien 13 March 2018 02: 36
        0
        On the continent beyond the puddle there is no air defense, not at all, but there is definitely no organized mass phenomenon. And their missile defense there is not designed to combat the mass raid of the Kyrgyz Republic. So if I got there, then almost 100% result wink
        1. Vlad.by
          Vlad.by 13 March 2018 08: 32
          0
          Their air defense is based on fighter aircraft. You don’t have to open your opponent with such caps. Thousands of fighters there. Another thing is that the reaction is different.
  17. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 12 March 2018 11: 58
    +4
    Vladimir Vladimirovich (or Volendemord Volendemorovich) told not everything. Left a couple of "trump cards" in the sleeve. For example, the bottom strategic missile Skif or the latest ballistic missile Rubezh. Saved, left for later. First, let this dermets from underneath be raked out, and we will later toss it to them later.
    1. Snail N9
      Snail N9 12 March 2018 12: 08
      +4
      ..... the bottom strategic missile Skif or the latest ballistic missile Rubezh

      There is also an underground "death star" (the Earth is hollow) - this is generally a doomsday weapon ....
    2. faradien
      faradien 13 March 2018 02: 44
      0
      Quote: VohaAhov
      Vladimir Vladimirovich (or Volendemord Volendemorovich) told not everything. Left a couple of "trump cards" in the sleeve. For example, the bottom strategic missile Skif or the latest ballistic missile Rubezh. Saved, left for later. First, let this dermets from underneath be raked out, and we will later toss it to them later.

      Yes, there are new missile defense systems S-500 and Nudol on the campaign, as well as the deployment of weapons on aircraft platforms on new physical. principles ... Rogozin said a few years ago that our missile defense would be impenetrable.
  18. Livonetc
    Livonetc 12 March 2018 12: 13
    +8
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Such crazy projects of “flying Chernobyls” are not power, but complete powerlessness.
    No different from: "we infect everyone with anthrax (or plague), even if we ourselves become infected."

    We didn’t comprehend anything from either the article or the president’s message about the specific structure of this unit.
    So there is no reason to consider this project “insane”.
    From Soviet practice, we see that crazy projects were screened out at a certain stage for completely logical reasons.
    Well, the question is what is considered crazy.
    At one time, US misinformation regarding the ability of Americans to develop weapons to drop Star Wars gave a huge impetus to the development of detection and destruction tools in the USSR.
    Americans are unsurpassed marketers of provocateurs and disinfectants.
    However, then they seriously miscalculated what was possible and what was inaccessible to science and industry of the USSR.
    Let them be mistaken about this even now, if they wish.
    1. cats
      cats 13 March 2018 10: 25
      +2
      Quote: Livonetc
      Americans are unsurpassed marketers of provocateurs and disinfectants.

      That’s the difference. They cannot scream, then they think, then again they cannot ..
      The bottom line is that Putin is not a balabol. They know this, from that such confusion.
      Even a proxy in one line fit,
      apparently there are no words. lol
  19. ares1988
    ares1988 12 March 2018 12: 27
    +2
    To prove the reality of the AME samples from the message will have, first of all, not to the domestic liberal public, but to foreign "partners". The purpose of the message was: to put them at the negotiating table on global issues (missile defense, strategic offensive arms, the INF Treaty, the CFE Treaty, not counting sanctions and other things), and it is beneficial to conduct these negotiations by concluding deals that are advantageous to us. And in order to have certain arguments in such negotiations, you have to convince them of the reality of all this van der waffe.
  20. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 12 March 2018 13: 11
    +4
    Quote: Sverdlov
    The German is right. The laws of physics have not been canceled and cannot be canceled. To give a momentum to the movement, it is necessary to throw back either a larger mass with a higher speed or air with a higher speed. In this fantasy, spacecraft flew in water vapor ....

    This same German Schmeker Kotoriy convinced that the DPRK would have no ICBMs until at least 2020.
    No law of physics prevents a krilate rocket from flying, discarding heated air into a nuclear reactor. With her, she can fly at subsonic speed, but at a very long range and for a long time, which gives an undoubted tactical advantage.
    1. Korax71
      Korax71 12 March 2018 14: 06
      +3
      How much will such a prodigy cost? And who will guarantee 100% successful launches of such missiles? And storage, transportation, preparation for use? Biological protection how will it be carried out? And if it is subsonic, what will prevent it from being knocked down? Appropriateness of having this ashtray clearly outweigh all the advantages of its presence? Yes, and there is no reason to launch such a launch from its territory. They can detect it, but they can knock it off so that it doesn’t have time to fly over the border.
      1. Winnie76
        Winnie76 12 March 2018 16: 05
        +4
        Quote: Korax71
        How much will such a child prodigy cost?

        How much is a bullet flying in the forehead. Few people care.
        Quote: Korax71
        and who will guarantee 100% successful launches of such missiles?

        Guarantees, as you know, only at a savings bank.
        Quote: Korax71
        biological protection how will be implemented?

        Who cares. Perhaps she will not be at all.
        Quote: Korax71
        and if it is subsonic, what will prevent it from knocking down?

        What prevents knocking down an ax? Nevertheless, the axes are riveting.
        Quote: Korax71
        questions of expediency, having this pepelats clearly outweigh all the advantages of its presence?

        After the use of calibers in Europe, all compasses were bought out, draw circles 2000 km. And then the whole ball is under the gun. Of course not practical laughing
        Quote: Korax71
        ? Yes, and there is no sense in launching such a launch from their territory. They can detect a start, but they can bring it down that it does not have time to really fly over borders.

        What if she flies across the North Pole? Who will knock her down, Superman?
        Quote: Korax71
        if launching from surface or airborne carriers, then what did solid-fuel rockets not suit?

        Range
      2. Ingvar_1970
        Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 01: 13
        0
        They can be launched in advance, swarm and let them fly along the borders and in neutral waters. Strategic bombers, after all, no one is shooting down now. So they will fly for a long time and you won’t do anything - you knock down one whole swarm immediately attacks.
        I would use that.
  21. Photon
    Photon 12 March 2018 13: 43
    +3
    In any search engine, enter the "Soviet nuclear rocket engine." We look at pictures and read
  22. Sagaidark
    Sagaidark 12 March 2018 13: 45
    +3
    The transformation of the classical “nuclear triad” into the devilish “pentagram” is the best of everything that Kaptsov wrote)

    I would rephrase - “nuclear pentagram”
  23. UVB
    UVB 12 March 2018 14: 05
    +2
    And by the way, why was Zircon, the main naval sensation of the previous year, ignored?
    But what if it was large-scale disinformation, a cover for the same “Dagger" with much higher characteristics? It is no coincidence that the President awarded special services for secrecy in the development of new weapons.
    1. Snakebyte
      Snakebyte 12 March 2018 15: 11
      0
      There are questions to Zircon - how to direct a rocket surrounded by a layer of heated plasma that blocks any radiation to a point, moving target (ship)?
      And why did they ignore the Russian missile defense system, the tests of which were successfully passed in December?
      The President did not want to please the citizens that they should not be afraid of American missiles?
      1. lance
        lance 12 March 2018 18: 00
        +1
        the answer is the same simple, if the dagger is pointed, then the zircon is the same
        1. Snakebyte
          Snakebyte 13 March 2018 09: 08
          0
          How is the dagger pointed? It is one thing to direct a rocket according to the data of the onboard ANN to predetermined coordinates of the target, another is to get into a moving target. In this case, active guidance is required.
          1. Ingvar_1970
            Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 01: 29
            0
            With a megaton charge, you can not hit very accurately. After starting at these speeds, the target will not go far and will be guaranteed to be damaged. It's my opinion.
    2. cats
      cats 13 March 2018 10: 31
      +2
      Quote: UVB
      It is no coincidence that the President awarded special services for secrecy in the development of new weapons.

      It’s not for nothing that he awarded, you look like the seats are lit by vrazhin .. laughing
  24. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 12 March 2018 15: 02
    +3
    Yeah! If someone destroys humanity, then it will be the people themselves. And many millions of years of evolution will be taken down the drain.
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 01: 31
      0
      You are wrong, evolution will just advance and will not repeat such a mistake as man.
  25. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 12 March 2018 15: 03
    +1
    How to evaluate the PLUTO project in the USA
    Nevertheless, SLAM, and in particular its Project Pluto nuclear engine, remain fascinating (if somewhat horrific) evidence of the ingenuity of nuclear scientists and military planners in the early years of the Cold War.


    Project Plan PLUTO-IIC

    A completely insane project - a ramjet engine has the property of monstrous air pollution.
    1. Winnie76
      Winnie76 12 March 2018 16: 15
      +1
      Quote: DimerVladimer
      A completely insane project - a ramjet engine has the property of monstrous air pollution.

      In the event of a nuclear exchange, environmental issues will be considered last
      1. DimerVladimer
        DimerVladimer 13 March 2018 10: 50
        +2
        Quote: Winnie76
        In the event of a nuclear exchange, environmental issues will be considered last


        Yes, yes - they have already heard.
        The population in the Urals regularly receives reminders of the nuclear apocalypse in the form of the poisoned Techa river, the EURT, dusting of the shores of Lake Karachay (Since October 1951, lake Karachay (reservoir-9, V-9) has been used to remove liquid radioactive waste. about 120 million curies of radioactive materials (mainly radioactive cesium-137 and strontium-90). The potential danger of a reservoir is the possibility of radioactive aerosols entering the atmosphere under abnormal meteorological conditions (tornado) and groundwater pollution) http: //www.atomic -energy.ru/articles/2013/03/25/4
        0689
        As well as the release of ruthenium in September 2017.
  26. Operator
    Operator 12 March 2018 15: 36
    +2
    Quote: Yeshua-Solomon Movshevich
    German is right

    Somehow not kosher on your part laughing
  27. businessv
    businessv 12 March 2018 16: 11
    0
    Friends, here the Ministry of Defense noted on a hot topic! Nothing new has been said, a little explanation on its purpose, take a look! https://rg.ru/2018/03/12/reg-pfo/v-minoborony-pri
    otkryli-sekrety-rakety-s-iadernoj-silovoj-ustanov
    koj.html? utm_source = warfiles.ru
  28. Operator
    Operator 12 March 2018 16: 20
    +9
    Oleg - I was pleased to plus your article, the correct formulation of the question in conditions of a minimum of information.

    However, there are inaccuracies in the article:

    The American SLAM Pluto project provided for the creation of an open-cycle supersonic cruise missile with a nuclear ramjet ramjet - pumped air passed directly inside the channels of a nuclear reactor. The fuel rod tubes (100x7,6x5,8 mm) were made of a ceramic alloy of uranium, beryllium and zirconium oxides with a working temperature of 1300 degrees Celsius. The estimated speed of the CR was planned at 3M (1040 m / s or 3600 km / h). Range at an altitude of 18000 meters - 120000 km, at an altitude of 300 meters - 21000 km.

    The KR glider was made of thick-walled sheets of Rene-41 nickel alloy with a thickness of 4 to 10 mm and had to withstand heating to 540 degrees Celsius without cooling.

    The thermal power of the TORI slow neutron nuclear reactor in the latest version reached 600 MW.

    Starting weight of the KR without solid fuel boosters was 20 tons, the length of the hull was 20 meters, and the diameter of the hull was 1,5 meters.

    The sound pressure of the shock wave at an altitude of 300 meters was estimated at 150 decibels (due to the lower flight speed than at an altitude of 18000 meters).

    Radioactive air pollution from an open-loop reactor occurred due to induced radiation in the particles of dust and salt pumped through the reactor in sea water. Therefore, radioactive contamination was at an acceptable level, even in the case of the simultaneous use of hundreds of SLAM Pluto (with the exception of cases of emergency destruction of fuel elements, of course).

    The reason the USA abandoned the production of SLAM Pluto was the sharp changes in the speed of the controlled nuclear reaction in an open cycle reactor due to fluctuations in the degree of deceleration / acceleration of the reaction with increasing / decreasing concentration of water vapor, dust and salt in the pumped air - control device slowing rods did not have time to fend off the fluctuations in the speed of the nuclear reaction and the reactor went into spacing

  29. Old26
    Old26 12 March 2018 16: 22
    0
    Quote: UVB
    But what if it was large-scale disinformation, a cover for the same “Dagger" with much higher characteristics?

    Yeah, disa. And launches from Nenoksa, and photographs of launches, and the alteration of the atomic ship of project 1144 - all for desa ...
    1. Operator
      Operator 12 March 2018 17: 13
      +5
      Unlike the open-loop slow-neutron air-cooled nuclear reactor (developed in the SLAM Pluto project), the power plant of the Russian supersonic intercontinental cruise missile uses a closed-loop fast-neutron liquid-metal cooling plutonium nuclear reactor of the same design as the core and the primary cooling circuit with nuclear reactor BAPL "Status-6".

      Plutonium fuel elements are encased in a high-strength carbon-carbon composite, which is coated on top with silicon carbide to protect against carbon oxidation.

      A eutectic alloy of lead and bismuth is used as the coolant of the first cooling circuit. Electricity for the operation of a linear type circulation pump is generated by a thermionic generator built into the heat exchanger. The primary heat for transferring the coolant to the liquid phase at the beginning of reactor operation is taken from the solid propellant rocket engine operating in the process of accelerating the rocket to supersonic speed and placed in the heating chamber and ramjet nozzle.

      After the reactor reaches the operating mode, the liquid metal carrier removes heat from the assembly of the fuel elements and gives it to the air in the ramjet heating chamber, and then is pumped back to the reactor. The pressure in the heating chamber is maintained by high-speed air pressure.

      The absence of direct exposure to dust and salt contained in the pumped air, as well as the absence of contact of water vapor with fuel elements in a closed-loop reactor eliminates radioactive pollution of the environment and jumps in the speed of the nuclear reaction.

      The power unit of the BATL “Status-6” is distinguished by the presence of a second circuit in the cooling system, in which a water coolant circulates, evaporating in a heat exchanger, triggered in a steam turbine and condensing in a condenser (cooled by sea water). A high-speed steam turbine rotates an electric generator that supplies current to a low-speed electric motor with a gearless propeller drive. The propeller propulsion system is designed to ensure the speed of the UAV at 100 knots / 180 km / h at a depth of 1000 km (in the absence of cavitation).

      All said, of course, IMHO bully
      1. Olezhek
        Olezhek 12 March 2018 19: 15
        0
        the power plant of the Russian supersonic intercontinental cruise missile uses a closed-loop fast-neutron liquid metal cooling plutonium nuclear reactor,

        It sounds ominous ... am
      2. Winnie76
        Winnie76 12 March 2018 19: 34
        +1
        It is subsonic like
  30. NF68
    NF68 12 March 2018 16: 40
    0
    + + + + + + + + + +
  31. Shahno
    Shahno 12 March 2018 17: 56
    +1
    By the way, where is Zircon .. But is it more real than a yard in the Kyrgyz Republic? I’ve been waiting for 2-3 for when reality will destroy the basic physical. principles. Landau and Bohr failed. Maybe Putin and Co. can ...
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 12 March 2018 18: 56
      0
      So they say, TO (Einstein's theory of relativity) is based on conflicting postulates.

      Well, the speed of light is constant. It can only be in a specific environment called ether.

      Those. a forgotten theory of ether can explain a lot.
    2. Operator
      Operator 12 March 2018 19: 22
      0
      The same problem with the Russian Zircon as with the Soviet Koala and the American X-51 - kerosene refuses to mix with air in the combustion chamber of a hypersonic ramjet (see interview with Herbert Efremov).

      Until they switch to liquid methane or hydrogen, a hypersonic chemical fuel rocket will not take off.
  32. Operator
    Operator 12 March 2018 18: 30
    0
    Possible type of liquid metal / air heat exchanger of a supersonic cruise missile with a closed-loop nuclear reactor

    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 12 March 2018 20: 30
      0
      Rather, on this rocket there is an electro-reactive subsonic engine that gives 300000 rpm on the shaft, and a nuclear battery with a generator feeds it.
  33. gladcu2
    gladcu2 12 March 2018 18: 50
    0
    The author gave out a little information, but didn’t finally clarify the picture.

    So how does this RD work?
    1. cats
      cats 13 March 2018 10: 35
      +2
      Quote: gladcu2
      So how does this RD work?

      Are you sleeping too hard?
      Wanted an adventure?
  34. 100ik
    100ik 12 March 2018 19: 36
    +2
    Ilya Muromets went with the Snake Gorynych to fight. Day is coming, two is coming, he suddenly sees a cave. He looked into it, and shouts:
    - Serpent Gorynych, come out, we will fight!
    And the answer is silence. He again:
    - Serpent Gorynych, come out, we will fight!
    Silence. He is the third time:
    - Serpent Gorynych, come out, we will fight!
    - Well, to fight, so to fight, but why yell in the ass?
  35. stone
    stone 12 March 2018 19: 41
    +1
    The dagger is the same Iskander screwed to the MIG; Sarmat is just a new unfinished ICBM. Nothing new and revolutionary. A hypersonic missile is real, but the Americans will do it faster. Judging by the PAK FA and other Armats, ours will be sawing it for another 10 years. Well, CR with NRE is ... I have a question how to test it with NRE, even if it is really shoved into a compact CR? Agree with the Japanese or Ukrainians to rent Fukushima or Chernobyl? lol
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 12 March 2018 20: 32
      +1
      "The dagger is the same Iskander." No, not the same - missiles are completely different.
      1. stone
        stone 13 March 2018 05: 13
        +1
        Yes, of course, completely different !! One is green, the other is blue lol
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 15 March 2018 23: 44
          0
          Missiles even have different head fairings. And the dagger in the head part has orientation engines.
  36. Berkut24
    Berkut24 12 March 2018 20: 05
    +3
    Honestly, now no one will say exactly what percentage of the tale and misinformation sounded in Putin's speech. And the main problem for the United States and its “six” is that they cannot accurately determine the extent of the threat. The United States and Russia have swapped places. Once upon a time, Reagan scared the USSR with Star Wars and our country tore up the navel in the economy, struggling with a nonexistent threat. Now in a similar situation, Trump. The national debt is growing sharply. Many projects, such as the F-35, suck out a lot more money than originally planned. And ahead are plans to change the generation of stationary ballistic missiles, change generations in nuclear submarines, etc. A few wars, which take trillions ... And in this situation, Putin offers the Pentagon another "little" planned to be spent.
    No need to argue now about what is possible and what is not. The essence of the message of the President was not that. Here the rates are not technical at all, but political and economic. The hegemon was challenged openly. And the glove was not thrown into his face, but was pulled over his head instead of a clown cap. And his free and involuntary allies look at their patron and wait for his reaction. But Trump is ready to threaten, but can not punish Russia. And this unexpected “squiggle” is the weapon that Russia used. Many may think that the king is no longer the king.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Santa Fe
      12 March 2018 21: 28
      +6
      Quote: Berkut24
      Reagan scared the USSR "Star Wars" and our country undermined the navel in the economy, struggling with a non-existent threat

      Are you seriously?

      The USSR did not tear the navel in 1930's. having built more tanks than all the countries of the world combined
      The arms race could not be (and never was) any significant cause of the destruction of the country
      1. Berkut24
        Berkut24 13 March 2018 10: 02
        +1
        Have you tried to study the issues of budgeting of the military sector as a percentage of GDP in the 30s and 70-80s? And given the military-economic assistance to the so-called allies and friends?
  37. ★ VLADIMIR ★
    ★ VLADIMIR ★ 12 March 2018 21: 10
    +2
    ))) Ha ha ha. And who doubted it. Hitler also doubted, and did not believe the warnings that the Russians would give him a snot.
  38. invas
    invas 12 March 2018 23: 51
    +4
    "The announcement of the creation of an ultra-powerful combat laser contrasts with a very weak laser industry: Russia is not among the world's largest manufacturers of laser equipment (Coherent, IPG Photonics or Chinese Han 'Laser Technology)."

    Over 80% of the global production of high-power industrial fiber lasers falls on IPG Photonics, owned by VP Gapontsev (aka Director General of the Scientific and Technical Association "IRE-Polyus").
  39. Romin
    Romin 13 March 2018 00: 21
    +1
    Such missiles are a breakthrough. I just wonder, the lack of strike drones-analogues that have already been taken out of service by the Predators, what will we fill in with? Immediately nuclear?
    1. cats
      cats 13 March 2018 10: 40
      +3
      Quote: Romin
      lack of shock drone-analogues

      Why do we need analogues?
      We protect the country, not to bomb weddings ..
  40. jonht
    jonht 13 March 2018 04: 44
    0
    It seems Oleg Kaptsov has embarked on the path of correction, there are no longer armadillos and aircraft carriers, but a very interesting article ....
  41. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 13 March 2018 10: 15
    0
    Quote: ★ VLADIMIR ★
    ))) Ha ha ha. And who doubted it. Hitler also doubted, and did not believe the warnings that the Russians would give him a snot.


    Ha ha ha Do not take all jokes to heart! Bribery is our national sport! When the pan, or gone, it's all Russian roulette.
  42. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 13 March 2018 10: 33
    +2
    Quote: Snakebyte
    Historical examples show that countries that have failed conventional arms programs have relied on miracle weapons.
    Suppose that all information about the new weapons is real, and this is not PR. At the moment, the Americans have nothing to fear. So far, only the laser complex and the "Dagger" are in the troops and in pilot operation. The first is a purely defensive weapon, the second has insufficient range to destroy targets in the United States.
    The remaining products are only in development, maximum at the initial stage of testing. It will take years, if not decades, for a sufficient number of new products to stand on alert.
    During this time, the Americans will develop countermeasures, their scientific and technical reserve is enormous. Or, in the worst case, they decide to neutralize the threat in the bud, suddenly discovering that there is no democracy in Russia. And most countries will support them, no one will want to wait until Status-6 gives them mass genocide.


    It seems that you have dug in somewhere in Idaho or Iowa, and having eaten bigmacs with nutella for dinner, after a heavy sleepless nachi, covering your head in the morning with tricolor, incurred a troll without a twinge of conscience? Can I change the diet?
    And about the Ammerz bo-o-olshov hurt, I agree, after the shuttles a hole is closed for a long time!
  43. sib.ataman
    sib.ataman 13 March 2018 11: 27
    +2
    Quote: stone
    The dagger is the same Iskander screwed to the MIG; Sarmat is just a new unfinished ICBM. Nothing new and revolutionary. A hypersonic missile is real, but the Americans will do it faster. Judging by the PAK FA and other Armats, ours will be sawing it for another 10 years. Well, CR with NRE is ... I have a question how to test it with NRE, even if it is really shoved into a compact CR? Agree with the Japanese or Ukrainians to rent Fukushima or Chernobyl? lol


    Yours will not cut anything at all! They will troll and gundos. Sometimes they will pull their heads out of the sand to look around.
  44. The comment was deleted.
  45. LIP
    LIP 13 March 2018 22: 20
    0
    And who were Lomonosov, Mendeleev, Popov, Sakharov, Sikorsky and you can still list the names of prominent scientists, inventors and many others. All of them are RUSSIANS! This is not only famous for GREAT RUSSIA !!!
    1. Ingvar_1970
      Ingvar_1970 29 June 2018 01: 44
      0
      Yeah, we won our next programming competition again.
  46. Silinvv
    Silinvv 14 March 2018 14: 11
    +1
    Spent 10 minutes, understood nothing! What are you talking about? The atomic plane was made and tips and s and it all flew in the 60s. Nothing new...
  47. Knut
    Knut 14 March 2018 18: 23
    0
    [/ quote] Russia is not among the world's largest manufacturers of laser equipment (Coherent, IPG Photonics or Chinese Han 'Laser Technology) [quote]

    Not verified information in the article, just speculation.
    The IPG corporation was founded by Russians and still owned by the Russians; the production is located in Fryazino, Moscow Region as well (IPG occupies 80% of the laser source market)
  48. NordOst16
    NordOst16 14 March 2018 20: 58
    +2
    Of course, I have very modest knowledge in nuclear physics, a little more in chemistry. And what’s interesting to me is that nuclear rocket engines were tested in the USSR and quite successfully, but there hydrogen was a coolant, which is a relatively inert gas (but that does not mean that it did not cause problems with its diffusion). There was fuel, if memory serves, uranium carbide, and reflector zirconium hydride. Well, in this miracle rocket, the coolant will be air and oxygen (and nitrogen) heated to several thousand degrees, most likely they will dissociate very briskly, on the one hand - this is good because the volume of the coolant is growing, but on the other - atomic oxygen of the strongest oxidizing agents, which means this extremely aggressive substance and carbides with hydrides disappear immediately, like graphite. In addition, moisture from the atmosphere will also fall into the active zone, which will also affect the nuclear characteristics of AZs. As for me, it all sounds like Star Wars from the old Reagan.
    If you do not touch the physical and design component, then the victory of technology over common sense will not work out? For I am sure that such a CD will be much more expensive (if not an order of magnitude) of a regular CD if not an ICBM / SLBM. And what will this missile be able to, what can ordinary KR (X101 / 102) with a flight range of about 5k km not be able to?
    In the mornings Putin and Shoigu do not call me back, but, as for me, this is a rotten idea.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 15 March 2018 23: 50
      0
      The fact of the matter is that such a cruise missile with a nuclear engine will cost as much as an ICBM - not less than a billion rubles - for me, there is a regular nuclear fuel generator that powers an electric jet engine - and that's the whole point.
      1. NordOst16
        NordOst16 16 March 2018 12: 51
        +1
        I did not understand what you meant by the "nuclear fuel generator", but this is an even more abnormal idea because electric propulsion engines have an insignificant traction.
  49. Arikkhab
    Arikkhab 15 March 2018 10: 55
    +1
    Kaptsov? Kaptsov ....
    "The creation of the Angara launch vehicle, which dragged on for two decades? And it was financed, is this creation?
    "Against the background of the well-known situation with rocket science"? Failures during the test runs of the "Clubs"? It happens. Of course there are problems, most as a consequence of the politics of the 90s
  50. Feldscher
    Feldscher 15 March 2018 20: 24
    0
    Quote: Rey_ka
    the test of this weapon was monitored by the Norwegians and NATO A50 so that they are in the know and do not refute

    Doesn’t it bother that the A-50 is in service with Russia and India? laughing