"Satchel" against missiles

23
Modern war can rightly be called the war of electronics. Over the past few years, this industry has reached such results that it is becoming increasingly common to completely remove living soldiers from the battlefield and entrust everything to electronics. Nevertheless, a living person will still be present on the battlefields for a long time, although his life will be facilitated with the help of electronic devices. In view of this tendency, electronic warfare in general and means of active radioelectronic counteraction in particular become particularly important. Thus, the work of almost any unmanned aerial vehicle, of which so many have appeared in recent years, can be, at a minimum, broken with the help of EW tools. According to Tehran’s official statements, this is how the American drone RQ-170 was captured last year.

"Satchel" against missiles


However, it is not always necessary to take the enemy technique "alive." It is often enough to destroy it and not to worry about further "hospitality." The most promising way to destroy enemy aircraft or guided weapons is a directional beam of electromagnetic radiation of sufficient power. When the electronics of a cruise missile or an aircraft gets under such an impact, there is a serious disruption of its operation, and in some cases it literally burns out. Accordingly, the aircraft or rocket is no longer able to perform a combat mission.

More than ten years ago, at the Malaysian arms exhibition LIMA-2001, employees of the Moscow Radiotechnical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences for the first time demonstrated their latest development called the Ranets-E (also the designation Ranets-E is found). The presented sample was made on the basis of the MAZ-543 chassis and in appearance resembled some kind of communication machine. A container-cabin with a parabolic antenna on the roof was located on a four-axle chassis. The purpose of the “Ranets-E” complex, as was clear from the accompanying brochures, is to direct “firing” an electromagnetic pulse of the microwave range at various air and (if possible) ground targets in order to disable their electronics.

Mobile microwave protection system "Ranets-E" - this is exactly what the full name of the complex looks like - incorporates a high-power electric generator, a control system, an electromagnetic pulse generator and an antenna. Depending on the requirements of the customer, the complex can be manufactured both in stationary and mobile versions. Judging by the same declared mass of both versions of five tons, mobile is a container with equipment and a remote control mounted on the chassis. Stationary, respectively, differs only in supports for placement on the ground. The rest, apparently, the version of "Rantz-E" are similar.

The stated maximum radiation power of the “Rance-E” is 500 megawatts. This indicator produces a complex when the waves of the centimeter range are emitted and when a pulse is generated with a duration of the order of 10-20 nanoseconds. With longer work, respectively, the power of the electromagnetic beam is reduced. From the published data on the effectiveness of the complex, using the 50-decibel antenna unit (there is also an 45-decibel) guaranteed damage to the electronics of the aircraft or controlled ammunition is possible at distances up to 12-14 kilometers, and serious violations in its operation are observed at a distance to 40 km. Thus, with properly placed detection and target designation, the Ranets-E complex can easily cover objects or troops on the march from a large number of existing types of controlled weapons.

When firing an 50-decibel antenna, the electromagnetic radiation is transmitted by a relatively narrow beam, of the order of 15-20 degrees. In some cases, for example, when working on speed or maneuvering targets, another antenna, an 45 decibel, is required. It has a slightly lower radiation power and, as a result, a smaller effective range. Guaranteed damage to the enemy's electronics using this antenna is possible at ranges of no more than 8-10 kilometers. At the same time, this antenna has a much larger radiation angle: 60 °. Thus, depending on the tactical situation, you can use the most suitable antenna and hit existing targets.

As can be seen, the Ranets-E complex is a kind of alternative to short-range anti-aircraft missile systems. In addition, he even has some advantage over them: after hitting a target, only the target itself falls to the ground, without missile debris. This can be useful when covering objects surrounded by buildings or in similar conditions. In addition, this "microwave gun" is enough to know in which sector of the space the enemy aircraft is located. Having sufficiently recent data on this subject, "Ranets-E" can produce a "salvo" and destroy the enemy object. This can be useful when destroying aircrafts created using stealth technology: such a device only needs to appear on the radar screen a couple of times and with high probability it will get into the “Rantse-E” action area.

However, despite all its advantages, the Ranets-E mobile microwave protection system, even more than ten years after the first demonstration, has not been adopted. The fact is that in addition to the advantages it has its drawbacks. Thus, the normal operation of the complex is possible only in direct visibility conditions. Various objects of natural and artificial nature that are on the path of an electromagnetic pulse, if not screening it, at least significantly weaken it. Moreover, even at distances of more than ten kilometers, a “beam” of radiation is dangerous to humans. The second drawback directly follows from the need for "direct interference". A relatively small radius of guaranteed damage to the enemy's electronics can provoke him to use "smart" ammunition with a range of more than 15-20 kilometers, if any. Obviously, a massive strike with such missiles or bombs will make it relatively easy to destroy the covered objects together with the “Knapsacks-E” themselves - these “electromagnetic guns” may simply not have time to work on all targets. Finally, relatively long pauses should follow between pulses of maximum possible power to recharge the radiation generator.

All these shortcomings of the Ranets-E system ultimately affected the fate of the project. In its current state, it is simply disadvantageous to the military. At the same time, the further development of the project may well bring it into an acceptable form. If further versions of the Rantz-E will have a greater range of guaranteed destruction, less reload time and better opportunities to work at maximum power, then they will undoubtedly be able to break into the troops. Yes, and the commercial potential of such systems seems to be quite good, because it is a convenient, and most importantly, cheap means against expensive and accurate "smart" weapons.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 18 2012 08: 48
    Here it is, science fiction from movies is becoming a reality!
    1. 755962
      +2
      April 18 2012 10: 43
      And at first I even doubted. Dashing trouble is the beginning.
    2. estonian
      +3
      April 19 2012 00: 46
      Shas has Russia in service with the EW spectrum and has gone into serial production since 1998. I also have helicopter EW helicopter groups to suppress enemy air defense. Also, they are dangerous weapons against air defense. Air defense.
      1. 0
        April 19 2012 12: 16
        already there was such a topic ... or discussed in kamenty, but a nice device!
        Obviously, a massive blow with such missiles or bombs will make it relatively easy to destroy hidden objects together with the Knapsacks-E themselves - these "electromagnetic guns" may simply not have time to work for all purposes. Finally, between pulses of the highest possible power, relatively long pauses should follow to recharge the radiation generator.


        but what about the fact that everything should work together? and such satchels need a regiment then, given NATO's love of electronics
  2. +3
    April 18 2012 09: 27
    They’re probably working on Knapsack-2 !!!
  3. +5
    April 18 2012 09: 37
    Well, here's the answer to drones .... along with detection tools such a thing will greatly complicate their lives ...
  4. +2
    April 18 2012 09: 42
    I won’t be surprised if the Satchel-2M is already =)
  5. +3
    April 18 2012 11: 29
    Good stuff. Thanks to the domestic defense industry.
  6. KAZAKHSTAN
    0
    April 18 2012 12: 08
    Stretch the cables from the nuclear power plant and here you have a power source and volley bursts
  7. +1
    April 18 2012 12: 11
    / Here, like laser weapons, there are several areas of development ... the first is such complexes ... the second is the use of disposable elements ... based on elements that, when subjected to explosive action, generate powerful electromagnetic pulses during compression ... or for example the simplest ... if you apply a voltage to the microwave magnetron with a pulse that is hundreds of times higher than the rated voltage ... before burning out, it will give out an EMP pulse ....
  8. +2
    April 18 2012 12: 38
    The idea, of course, is beautiful) Turning a smart wunderwafer into a pile of useless scrap metal smile Yes, and the little man, apparently, is unpleasant. I would like to believe that such systems are already on the protection of critical facilities, in a stationary version it is much easier to solve the problem with high energy consumption, and, accordingly, with the speed of recharge.
    I am sure that work on modernization is underway. And in case of success and the spread of technology, everyone will have to think deeply about protecting their electronic filling.
    Or fight on the technique of the 50s smile
  9. +2
    April 18 2012 12: 40
    Satchel and Satchel E, this is only a simplified version of the Spectrum EW machine, which is still under the stamp, but was developed in the 1987 year, and so the Spectrum burns completely brains and boards, everything that conducts current, this kind of combat electronics, these are not Aboriginal steel birds frighten)))
    1. +1
      April 18 2012 13: 14
      Thank you for the information, Yandex does not know about Spectrum)
  10. alseek
    +3
    April 18 2012 13: 07
    We must already test in combat conditions - to put prototypes in Iran and Syria, you can in Sudan, camouflage under the house with a satellite dish and forth.
    In general, the future belongs to combined systems, a laser, an EMP, a Gatling gun, rockets are too expensive a pleasure, and to set up in such a way that it dodged the rays, to achieve iron at close range.
  11. KA
    KA
    +1
    April 18 2012 14: 08
    I think that the effectiveness of this weapon is greatly exaggerated! There are many ways to protect electronics from EMP, and if an UAV can act, then there is no airplane. But the main thing the author didn’t mention is electromagnetic compatibility, electronic warfare products to exclude spurious electromagnetic radiation should be located no closer than 1,5 km from the air defense system, and they only have 2 kW of continuous radiation power, and this thing will burn all of our electronics .
    1. +1
      April 18 2012 14: 28
      If used in a complex would be good ...
    2. +5
      April 18 2012 21: 54
      Soviet-made electronic warfare systems, from the 1980 years, learned to create EMR without direct influence, that is, directivity, imagine that you have a protected computer, with all the foil and graphite, in general, fully protected from EMP, and somewhere in kilometers 12- 15 is a special machine, and so it creates this impulse inside your system unit, due to microconductivity, that is, the field is created inside the protection and burns everything that conducts current. In tests, cables with a cross-section 5x15 in protective containers burned like firewood, and they were not even connected.
    3. +1
      April 19 2012 00: 03
      Well, as far as I understand the article, the radiation is narrowly targeted, so you don’t have to worry about your technique
  12. +6
    April 18 2012 15: 08
    US military microwave installation for remote non-fatal effects on people.
    Do not find it, it is very similar.
    1. Sergh
      +2
      April 19 2012 06: 14
      DEMENTIY, not about this installation, whether there was a lot of screaming and noise, the amers themselves remained crippled.
      1. +1
        April 19 2012 15: 04
        Serqh
        You are absolutely right, it’s about this one.
        I corrected you, minus received not deservedly.
  13. REPA1963
    +2
    April 18 2012 22: 03
    Represented 10 years ago, which means the development is still Soviet.
  14. Eugene
    0
    April 19 2012 19: 04
    But can not it be forced to work only on air targets?
    shoot down for example tactical cruise missiles, tomahawks, etc.?
    1. 0
      April 20 2012 02: 44
      it does not shoot down missiles, but burns their brains out. for this, the installation was done. and not for "suppressing riots", as is the case with amers.
      1. Eugene
        0
        April 20 2012 16: 55
        Well, I'm under the knock down and had in mind the burning of electronics on a rocket.
    2. volodj
      0
      April 22 2012 18: 26
      Well, the brains will burn out the rocket and that, but nothing, by inertia the rocket will reach the target anyway, the range of the EW complex is not large
  15. volodj
    0
    April 22 2012 18: 29
    Easier and cheaper to detonate a thermonuclear bomb at high altitude
    1. postman
      0
      3 May 2012 15: 53
      Quote: volodj
      Simpler and cheaper
      and more accurate and reliable e-bomb
  16. postman
    +1
    3 May 2012 15: 53
    Everything is wonderful and a 500 mega watt SERIOUS APPLICATION.
    FOLLOWED ONLY:
    - At what distance from the antenna? = 10 km (as claimed) And what do 10 km give?
    -How does power density fall at a distance from the axis of the beam? -n.d. (I won’t be surprised that much), and accordingly we must get the whole goal
    -How is the momentum created?
    Most likely FC-generators (the essence is the same explosion):

    In a typical coaxial FC generator, a cylindrical copper tube forms the armature. This tube is filled with "fast" high-energy explosives. Several types of explosives were used, from type B and C compositions to machine-machined PBX-9501 blocks. The armature is surrounded by a spiral, usually copper, which forms the stator of the FC generator. The stator winding in some designs is split into segments, with branching of the wires at the segment boundaries, in order to optimize the electromagnetic inductance of the armature spiral.
    "Backpack-E" is essentially an e-bomb that "explodes" in the container-cabin, and the energy is transmitted to the antenna to create an EMP.

    -How is reloading done?
    -How many intervals m / y pulses (rate of fire?)?
    - Power distribution depending on the angular magnitude of the EMP beam?
    etc.
  17. 0
    31 October 2014 10: 57
    interesting article, happy to give it a try. thanks to the author.