Insurance collector

17


Having received official independence from the United States immediately after World War II, the Philippines retained a very close relationship with the former metropolis, including in the military field. Most of the aircraft technology is American-made. Although there were deliveries from Europe, Australia, Israel. Recently, military-technical cooperation with the Republic of Korea has been actively developing.



In the Philippines, there were two of the largest US military bases outside the United States — the Clark Field air force and the Subic Bay naval base, but both were eliminated at the start of the 90's. The country is one of the most active participants in the dispute over the Spratly Islands and the surrounding waters.

Being in Southeast Asia, the Philippines for a number of signs have significant similarities with the countries of Latin America. We are talking about an unconditional orientation to the United States, Catholicism as the dominant religion, a very high level of corruption and crime, and a very peculiar structure of the armed forces. The Philippine armed forces are large in number, but they are focused exclusively on counterguerrilla operations and have accumulated good experience in this area.

At the same time, the army is completely unprepared for a classical war, since it does not have the equipment for this. The sun has no major tanks, Self-propelled guns, MLRS, full-fledged combat helicopters, ground-based air defense systems, submarines, ships and boats with any missile weapons. Available equipment of other classes, as a rule, is very outdated, its quantity is insignificant.

Ground forces are divided into joint commands - Northern Luzon (5, 7-Infantry Divisions), Southern Luzon (2, 9-I Infantry Divisions), Western, Central (3, 8-I Infantry Divisions), Western Highland Division, Western Highland Division, Western Highland Division, Western High Command infantry division, regiments of the SSO and rangers), East Mindanao (1, 4, 6-I infantry divisions). The 10 Infantry Divisions include the 10 Infantry Brigade. In addition, the ground forces include a motorized infantry division, five engineering brigades. There is also the command of the army reserve, which includes 32 infantry divisions.

Armed with 45 English Scorpion light tanks, 45 Dutch YPR-765 infantry fighting vehicles and 6 Turkish ACV-300s, more than 500 armored personnel carriers and armored vehicles - the American M113 and V-150 (268 and 137 units, respectively), the English Simba (133) , Portuguese V-200 (20). The artillery includes up to 300 towed guns - mostly American M101 and Italian M-56, as well as 570 mortars - Serbian M-69V (100), American M-29 and M-30 (400 and 70). In the army aviation up to 11 American light aircraft (3-4 Cessna-172, 1 Cessna-150, 2 Cessna-R206A, up to 2 Cessna-421, up to 2 Cessna-170).

As part of the Air Force of all 12 full-fledged combat vehicles, however, the latest South Korean fighter FA-50. There is a 2 base patrol aircraft (1 Dutch F-27-200MPA, 1 Australian N-22SL), up to 16 American reconnaissance OV-10. Transporters: American C-130 (5), Commander-690A, Cessna-177, Cessna-210 (one by one), the Dutch F-27 (2) and F-28 (1), the newest Spanish C -295 (3). Training aircraft: Italian S-211 (3) and SF-260 (22), to 36 American T-41. S-211 can theoretically be used as light attack aircraft. Multipurpose and transport helicopters: American AUH-76 (up to 8), S-76 (2), Bell-412 (up to 14), MD-520MG (up to 16), S-70A (1), Bell-205 ”(Up to 11), UH-1 (up to 110), as well as Italian AW-109 (6) and Polish W-3А (7). AUH-76 and W-3A can be used as drums.

The Navy has 4 old American-made frigates with purely artillery weapons: 1 Raj Humabon (Canon type), 3 Gregorio Pilar (Hamilton type, from the US Coast Guard). But patrol ships and boats in the set: 1 "General Alvarez" (American "Cyclone"), 3 "Emilio Jacinto" (English "Peacock"), 5 – 6 "Miguel Malvar" (old American trawlers "Edmyrabl"), 2 " Rizal "(old American minesweepers" Ok "), 2" Conrodo Yap "and 6" Tomaz Batilo "(South Korean" Sea Hawk "and" Chamsuri ", respectively), 2" Kagittingan "(German-built), 22" Jose Andrada ", 2 "Alberto Navarrete" (type "Point"), 29 "Swiftship". In addition, more than 20 patrol ships and boats are part of the Coast Guard. 2 DVKD type "Tarlak" Indonesian construction, including 15 TDK - 2 type "Bacolod" (American assault transports "Besson"), to 5 "Zamboan del Sur" (American LST-1 / 542), 1 "Tabganua" and XGNUMX "Tabgana" and X. "Manobo" (own construction), 1 "Ivatan" (Australian "Balikpapan").

As it was said, the ships and boats of the Philippine Navy do not have any missile weapons, even short-range air defense systems.

Naval aviation includes up to 13 aircraft (up to 8 English BN-2A, American "Cessna-172» and «Cessna-421») and to 14 helicopters (up to 7 German In-105, 1 American R-22, 6 Italian AW-109 ).

Marines consists of four brigades (one - reserve), is considered a "branch" of the land forces and is designed for counterguerrilla wars. In addition, the Philippine fleet can conduct landing operations of a limited scale only within its own archipelago. The 45 American BTR (23 LAV-300, 18 V-150, 4 LVTH-6) and 56 towed guns (30 M101, 20 M-56, 6 M-71) are in service.

In June, 2016-th Manila won a case against Beijing in the Hague Arbitration regarding the ownership of a number of islands and reefs in the South China Sea, but the opponent ignored this decision as expected. On the southern island of Mindanao, the war against Islamic radicals has been going on for many years, and in 2014 they swore to the banned in our country IG. In the event of the complete elimination of the bases of terrorists in Iraq and Syria, a significant part of the surviving militants will move to Southeast Asia, primarily to Mindanao. The 2017 battles against the caliphate militants outside the city of Maravi, which continued from May to October, although formally won by the Philippine army, showed that its potential was extremely limited.

Today, the PLA Navy without any problems can organize a large-scale landing on the Philippines. Paradoxically, it would be much easier for the Chinese than to go to Taiwan. But his Armed Forces are much stronger than the Philippine army, moreover, initially focused on repelling such aggression.

As the experience of the last decade shows, hopes for a military alliance with the United States have become suicidal for a number of countries and non-state actors (Georgia, Ukraine, the Syrian “opposition”). Apparently, in the near future the Kurds, and then Taiwan will replenish this series, since Washington’s gigantic military power is formal. Comparable opponents are too tough for him. In these cases, he was not ready for war with Russia, and also obviously not capable of armed confrontation with China. The United States can deliberately expose the Allies under attack without rendering them any real help.

Apparently, the new Filipino President Duterte made certain conclusions from these facts and began a significant diversification of foreign policy. It is worth noting that so many modern national leaders are still incapable of such awareness, continuing to believe that the alliance with the US guarantees them something.

The impossibility of the military confrontation of the PRC and the interest in economic cooperation with this country force Duthert to come to a substantial rapprochement with Beijing. At the same time, the Philippine president is not ready for a complete break with the United States due to the presence of too close ties in the economic and military fields, as well as the need for insurance against the influence of China. And in order not to be sandwiched between the two giants, Duterte will strengthen ties with other centers of power. Russia should be an additional argument against the United States, Japan - a counterweight to China.

In general, we can say that Duterte, to a certain extent, changed the geopolitical situation in Southeast Asia. However, Manila’s influence is limited due to its low economic, political and military potential. Coupled with internal instability, this automatically reduces the value of the Philippines as a potential ally for major powers. In particular, for Russia, the country will obviously remain on the far periphery of interests, although in words Moscow will in every way welcome rapprochement with Manila. For the United States and for the close neighbors of the Philippines, interest in this country will be somewhat higher, but it will not be in the center of their attention unless the new “Islamic Caliphate” emerges in the Philippines. However, this option is hardly needed by Manila itself.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    27 January 2018 15: 43
    That's where these come from? A man writes about the Philippines, suddenly BABAH! fart blast, Ukraine, Georgia, they are all but uninhabited, Chinese landing, geopolitics. Again.
    1. +1
      27 January 2018 18: 50
      The Philippines has more than 7100 islands (perhaps not everyone has figured it out yet). It doesn’t fit my head how the state can control everything there? belay
  2. +4
    27 January 2018 16: 35
    And in my opinion everything is in the subject.
  3. 0
    27 January 2018 18: 45
    Wang, that only an attempt to diversify will end in a color revolution
  4. 0
    27 January 2018 21: 08
    Georgia and Ukraine did not have a military alliance with the United States.
    If there was, it is clear that there would be no Russian troops in either Crimea or Ossetia with Abkhazia.
    1. +2
      27 January 2018 21: 21
      Quote: sd68
      Georgia and Ukraine did not have a military alliance with the United States ..

      What do you mean a military alliance? Arms supply, training, joint maneuvers, staff exercises on tactics and strategy, planning the attack 080808 and providing satellite information for you is not a military alliance with Georgia.
      Then what is it?
      Quote: sd68
      If there was, it is clear that there would be no Russian troops in either Crimea or Ossetia with Abkhazia.

      It’s only a pan that could come up with such words (no offense of course), do you think the United States will fight for Ukraine, Georgia or Turkey, Kurdistan? You still do not understand that Ukrainians are fighting just for the interests of the United States?
      1. +1
        27 January 2018 23: 19
        Quote: APASUS
        What do you mean a military alliance?

        Relevant international treaty. In relation to Ukraine - an agreement between the administrations of B.Kh. Obama and V.F. Yanukovych, apparently.
        Quote: APASUS
        Arms supply, training, joint maneuvers, staff exercises on tactics and strategy, planning the 080808 attack and providing satellite information for you is not a military alliance with Georgia.

        No. The union involves commitments.
        Quote: APASUS
        you think the United States will fight for Ukraine, Georgia or Turkey, Kurdistan

        There is no Ukraine, no Georgia, because there is no union. There is no Turkey, since Turkey attacks itself, and the North Atlantic Treaty provides only protection against attack. Everything is complicated with the Kurds, however, the very moderate successes of the Turkish army in Syria show that most likely someone called to Ankara.
        1. +1
          28 January 2018 10: 01
          Quote: Cherry Nine
          No. The union involves commitments.

          A union based on the destruction of the sovereignty of one country to another, do not tell me laugh. When it was the knights who fought for the will of the slaves.
  5. 0
    28 January 2018 12: 30
    Test photo.

    The boys have sharpening sharpenings.

    And the article gave an idea of ​​itself in one phrase, about the counter guerrilla struggle.
    The Philippine Army is designed to solve local partisan conflicts.
  6. 0
    29 January 2018 09: 21
    // In June 2016, Manila defeated Beijing in the Hague arbitration case regarding the ownership of a number of islands and reefs in the South China Sea, but the opponent expectedly ignored this decision. //
    This offer just killed me!
    Since when does arbitration resolve territorial disputes between states !? Naturally, the Chinese ignored this decision, because the court is not authorized to examine such cases.
    1. +1
      29 January 2018 11: 52
      Quote: Serg4545
      This offer just killed me!
      Since when does arbitration resolve territorial disputes between states !?

      You just are not in the subject.

      Territorial waters (12 miles) and the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) (200 miles) are measured off the coast or islandsoccupied by the state, but not from rocks, reefs and shallows. Accordingly, in the South China Sea (SCM), 6 countries understand what is considered an island, and what is a rock or reef. China, among other things, made several islands itself, with dredgers, and now it requires the EEZ around them (and this is the exclusive right to catch and to extract PI).
      Naturally, these legal issues are decided either by shooting, or through the courts. In this case, through the UN Commission on the Law of the Sea. The arbitration mentioned is not the one according to Yukos, but the special one according to Yukm. Just such a city, judges like to live there.

      Among other things, China from time to time declares that the UKM is its historical waters, such as the White Sea (the White Sea, by the way, is also wider than 12 + 12 miles at the entrance, so theoretically it can also be considered international waters and driven there by everyone even aircraft carriers, even drilling platforms). Naturally, everyone sends him away. The SKM is not a dead end, like Beloye, where Russia is on all sides, but a passage yard. China, of course, does not recognize these "all".
      1. +1
        29 January 2018 20: 05
        "China, among other things, made several islands itself, with dredgers, and now it requires around" /////

        The topic is really interesting ... It is technically quite possible to wash and pour a full-fledged island in a shallow place in neutral waters. And declare it yours.
        I did it myself - it means mine. Whose else could be?
        1. +1
          29 January 2018 20: 13
          Quote: voyaka uh
          The topic is really interesting ... It is technically quite possible to wash and pour a full-fledged island in a shallow place in neutral waters. And declare it yours.
          I did it myself - it means mine. Whose else could be?




          It is prohibited by international maritime law.
      2. +1
        29 January 2018 20: 40
        Quote: Cherry Nine
        China, among other things, made several islands itself, with dredgers, and now it requires the EEZ around them (and this is the exclusive right to catch and to extract PI).




        Artificial islands do not have the status of islands and do not have a territorial sea, an exclusive economic zone and a continental shelf.
        1. +2
          30 January 2018 06: 56
          Quote: Town Hall
          Artificial islands do not have island status

          As far as I remember, the Chinese took some kind of rock, stuck a flag, washed the island, set up a garrison and now claim that it is not only an island, but even a inhabited one. But this is a memory, I can lie.
          1. +1
            30 January 2018 10: 23
            Quote: Cherry Nine
            As far as I remember, the Chinese took some kind of rock, stuck a flag, washed the island, set up a garrison and now claim that it is not only an island, but even a inhabited one.



            They have such know-how. In the area of ​​Spratley Island .and they also cling to Japan because of some rocks in the sea.


            But since the law of the sea treats such a feint unambiguously, no one recognizes the Chinese Wishlist, they score it and drag it over by arbitration.

            And China will not be able to pull a vlushka against all its neighbors - South Caucasus, Vietnam, Cambodia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Japan, and who else claim these zones. This is not counting the United States
  7. 0
    10 February 2018 17: 55
    South Koreans release the "latest fighter"?
    This is news for me, I'll go read.