AK-12 will serve as a base for many modifications.

90
The new Kalashnikov assault rifle, designated AK-12 and presented by Izhmash in mid-February, meets all the requirements of Russian customers and has a fairly good chance of success in the global small-arms market. weapons. Such a statement was made by the creators of the new automaton, noting that the new AK model would be evidence that the Izhevsk enterprise changed the line of conduct with customers and began to listen to incoming complaints. “The Twelfth Kalashnikov,” according to the developers (chief designer V. V. Zlobin) has a number of fundamental differences from other AK series machines, which will allow it to become the basic model for creating future models of the most diverse functional purposes.

"Izhmash" admitted criticism

At present, the Izhmash plant is satisfied with its new brainchild. The main reason for pride is the use of Picatinny rail, which makes it possible to strengthen the base model of the machine with additional devices: range finders, optical sights, grenade launchers and others.

Picatinny rail is a rail interface system, a special bracket used on various types of small arms to unify the mounting of sights (collimator, optical) and other accessories, including laser sights, tactical flashlights, bipods and other things. These strips are common and widely used in NATO countries.
AK-12 will serve as a base for many modifications.
Picatinny Plank on a Saiga-12 carbine

They also acknowledged at the plant the criticism from the Ministry of Defense, in particular, the accusations of the military in the absence of a company with radically new products. Understanding this, the head of the company, Maxim Kuziuk, decided to work with the new team to launch a new machine. Previously, the plant carefully studied all the requirements of the special services and the military, as well as the existing line of automatic weapons. In the process of developing a new automaton, engineers found optimal solutions for improving the accuracy and accuracy of both single and automatic fire, reducing the recoil shoulder when firing. In the new AK significantly improved ergonomics and the ability to install a "body kit."

The Picatinny strips already mentioned will be used in the manufacture of other weapons, and will also allow Izhmash to produce products that meet the requirements of customers. According to the general director of the company, at the recent exhibition held in Nuremberg, the plant presented a whole line of its products - around its new products 18. Most of the smooth-bore guns and carbines "Saiga" is already equipped with Picatinny rail, as this is a requirement of the modern market. They are working on "Izhmash" and the question of relatively inexpensive modernization of existing Kalashnikovs with the installation of this bar.

Also, according to the general director of Izhmash, Russian automata remain the most reliable in the world, although this does not help them win major tenders. Maxim Kuzyuk connects this with political aspects and with dumping by competitors. At the same time, the enterprise successfully implements its civilian versions of the Kalashnikov assault rifle. The supply of Saiga rifles and carbines to the American market was increased by 50% based on the results of the exhibition held in Nuremberg. Prior to this, in January, at an exhibition in Las Vegas, Izhmash signed a contract for the supply of smooth-bore semi-automatic rifles with store supply “Saiga-12” to US police units

AK-12 will be the base for almost 20 developments

The fact that on the basis of the new machine can be created around 20 new models, including a sniper rifle, which can be replaced in the troops of the SVD, "Izhmash" reported at the beginning of 2012 year. Among other things, the designers of the company are busy developing the design of new machines, which is important for the civilian market. At the enterprise they understand that at the present time there is no point in producing weapons only for the needs of the military, on Izhmash they are busy creating a universal platform that can serve as the basis for many modifications. On the basis of AK-12 it is planned to create a whole range of dual-use products. According to the general director of the enterprise, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Ministry of Defense of Russia have already expressed interest in the development, currently negotiations are underway to demonstrate the machine to the leadership of the Ministry of Defense and the General Staff in April of this year.

Before reaching a series of state tests, the AK-12 assault rifle has already managed to make a lot of noise. So the General Staff noted that the machine does not fundamentally differ from the AK-47 modifications, which means it will have the same drawbacks. The Defense Ministry noted that they would not buy anything at Izhmash in 2012, and also noted the fact that they had given all their requirements for small arms to manufacturers two years ago, since then nothing has been submitted to state tests. Anyway, most of the criticism for the Izhevsk novelty is coming from the media, and not from the mouth of the official representatives of the army.

In turn, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin spoke in defense of Kalashnikov, who, during a visit to the enterprise, noted that the merits of the Russian machine gun are recognized even by Americans. We were satisfied with the novelty at the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, requesting an automatic machine for trial operation at the plant. To say how good or bad a new machine is, it will be possible after the state tests.

AK-12 main features

AK-12 is a promising development of Izhmash, designed to replace the previous versions of Kalashnikov assault rifles: AK-74 and AK-74М, AK-103, as well as earlier versions. The AK-12 index means “Kalashnikov assault rifle 2012 of the year”, but now it’s somewhat premature to talk about its prospects, since the machine has not yet been transferred for testing by the military. The main task in its creation was the preservation of combat performance, primarily reliability, while increasing versatility, improving ergonomic characteristics and accuracy of fire. The manufacturer promises to release AK-12 in two versions of the “light” caliber 5,45-mm and “heavy” caliber 7,62-mm.

AK-12 uses "classic" automation with a butterfly valve and a long stroke gas piston. To improve the operational and ergonomic characteristics of the model, the receiver was significantly redesigned, especially its upper part - the lid. The machine gun received an elongated roof of the receiver, which has increased rigidity and is hinged on the receiver in the front part of it. To disassemble the weapon, the lid folds forward and up. Together with a separate latch lid, which is controlled by a lever located in the rear of the receiver, this has achieved a constant position of the lid relative to the barrel of the machine. This is necessary for mounting optical and other sights on the Picatinny-type integral guide located on the cover.

The cocking handle was moved forward and attached to the gas piston rod, while the shooter can, if desired, be mounted either on the left or right side of the machine. This solution made it possible to eliminate the gap between the lid and the receiver, which is typical for the entire Kalashnikov machine gun family, which is covered by the safety catch-translator lever in the stowed position and is open to the "all winds" in the fighting position.

Fuse-translator fire modes has been redesigned. In the new model, it is placed on both sides of the machine, under the thumb of a shooting hand, and has four positions: a fuse, firing single cartridges, shooting bursts of 3 and automatic fire. Also in the design of the AK-12, a slide delay appeared, which is designed to speed up the recharge. There were upgraded and rifling and bullet entry of the barrel, which is designed to improve the accuracy of shooting. AK-12 can be used with regular magazines of the appropriate caliber with 30 capacity for ammunition (from AKM, AK-74 assault rifles), and magazines with RPK / RPK-74 machine guns, as well as with new promising four-row box-shaped magazines with 60 ammo capacity.

Differences AK-12 from previous versions:
- Improving the ergonomics of the machine, the introduction of a two-way shutter delay button, a two-way fuse-switch of the type of fire and a shift to the back of the magazine latch allows you to control the machine with one hand that holds the weapon (without removing it from the handle);
- the integration of Picatinny slats for mounting on an automatic attachment (sighting devices, range finders, flashlights, grenade launchers, etc.) required the developers to process the receiver, especially its covers;
- a new telescopic butt, folding in both directions, an adjustable pad and butt plate, the butt fixing mechanism in the unfolded state is now in the butt itself, and not in the receiver as before;
- the ability to install reload handles on both sides of the receiver (for convenience of left-handers and right-handers);
- the possibility of firing in 3-x modes: automatic, with a cut-off in 3 shots and single shots, previously optional for automatic "hundredth" series;
- muzzle device of the machine, which allows the use of foreign-made rifle grenades;
- New combined removable sight with an increased aiming line;
- variable rate of firing: automatic - 600 shots / min, mode with a cut-off queue for 3 shots - 1000 shots / min;
- barrel with improved performance accuracy;
- Changed the dynamic characteristics of the work of automation to increase the accuracy of automatic firing and reduction of shoulder recoil;
- shutdown shutter (gate delay);
- modified trigger mechanism;
- A new design of the bolt group.

Sources used:
www.newsru.com/russia/03apr2012/kalashnikov.html
www.lenta.ru/news/2012/04/03/ak12/
www.world.guns.ru/assault/rus/kalashnikov-ak-12-r.html
Materials free online encyclopedia "Wikipedia"
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Dimitrxnumx
    +23
    April 4 2012 08: 52
    Kalash’s potential is still huge, until they invent weapons based on new physical principles, Kalashnikov will be in high demand.
    1. +15
      April 4 2012 09: 10
      Yes! The old, new Kalash will remain for a very long time the soldier’s best friend! smile
    2. Flight Recorder
      -21
      April 4 2012 09: 15
      With the same success, using modern technologies, it is possible to modernize the three-ruler and the T-62 tank, and then declare, until the weapons are invented on new physical principles, these systems will be in high demand.
      Francis Fukuyama also once announced the End of History, but recently took his words back.
      1. +1
        April 4 2012 09: 54
        And they do it! )))
      2. +15
        April 4 2012 10: 12
        Board.
        The difference is that there is no more reliable AK in the world than an AK.
        Imagine holding G36 or Fn2000 or M16 and Ak.
        On the street, rain, dirt .... And the enemy creeps. Believe me, any person from any country in the world will choose AK in such a situation. Yes, he is not as accurate as the Belgian rifles, not as fast and convenient as the American carbines, But with ... he shoots! And does not misfire! And believe me, if you’re not even shot, you’ll shoot him without experience in 10 minutes!
      3. George IV
        +1
        April 4 2012 10: 53
        In my opinion, you are being neglected simply by inertia.
        By definition, nothing sensible and sensible is expected.
        1. Tyumen
          +3
          April 4 2012 11: 22
          And here, in the apt expression of Local,
          very severe patr-r-riots. Why read
          and delve into if the epaulet is gray.
      4. +1
        April 4 2012 12: 58
        Just apply modern technology in the production of the same mosquito ... and the results will pleasantly surprise you ... And this is the idea ... Plus ... an unconditional plus ...
        1. +9
          April 4 2012 15: 02
          Fins mosinka to a good sniper brought. Lodge, butt. I wouldn’t refuse such a thing. 7.62 TKIV 85
          1. 755962
            +2
            April 4 2012 16: 34
            I am glad that the potential of this system has not been exhausted. With modern technologies, you can continue to improve further. Legends go about reliability.
          2. +10
            April 4 2012 17: 17
            We did not forget about the "mosinka" either, after the OTs-48 (based on the Mosin rifle model 1891/1930), we carried out its deep modernization according to the "bullpup" scheme, received the OTs-48K.
            1. +1
              April 4 2012 17: 55
              You plus for Old. But still a freak, and I don’t like bulpups.
              1. +3
                April 4 2012 18: 13
                I don't know why, but when creating the OTs-48, they did not use a replaceable box magazine, and so, I like it more than the OTs-48K. I hope it's not evening yet, for creativity with the "Mosinka".
              2. Kamaz
                0
                12 May 2012 17: 20
                But still a freak, and I don’t like bulpups.



                But in vain! Indeed, in the Bull-Pap scheme there are a lot of advantages! For example, thanks to the back of the store, with unchanged dimensions, the barrel length changes significantly, which allows to increase accuracy!
                Also (again thanks to the store) the rifle will be more stable (because of the support on the shoulders) and it can be deployed very quickly (AK of course, you can also deploy wink but amer is not very convenient laughing)!
      5. predator
        +3
        April 4 2012 18: 36
        a three-ruler with many "barrels" can still be stretched, this is fantastic accuracy and unpretentiousness, though I had to shoot from a carbine, this is THING!
      6. HOUSES
        +8
        April 4 2012 18: 36
        Read an article by Peter J. Kokalis, an American expert on small arms, called Black Kalashnikov. This is a review of the 100th series. So he believes that in accuracy and accuracy the AK under the NATO cartridge is in no way inferior to the AR-15, and in reliability it is much higher. He gives an example: when shooting several stores from a Korean AK, it turned out that all this time a piece of a torn sleeve hung in the receiver.
        Conclusion: the machine is not a bad, bad cartridge. But we cannot understand how to change the cartridge, we will blame the domestic weapons until blue in the face and invent the long-invented weapons.
        1. +2
          April 4 2012 21: 46
          you are right, I also read somewhere that an AK with a good (high-quality) cartridge shoots more closely.
          1. 0
            April 6 2012 22: 52
            It has been written here more than once that accuracy is a relative advantage, and when shooting at a distance of <= 300m (the most frequent shooting distance) should not be too high, otherwise the probability of hitting is reduced.
          2. 0
            April 8 2012 21: 13
            so it can insert the wick's patrons, so that the cartridges are the same fired, and not + - 1g. by bullet, gunpowder
      7. mind1954
        +2
        April 5 2012 00: 56
        Why not ? What do you dislike about the three-ruler?
        It still determines cost-effectiveness!

        And if you apply new materials, technologies to AK
        which have now become much cheaper in recent
        ten years or introduce the latest squeaks of science and technology,
        which will become available for mass use
        and cheap, then at the same cost you can achieve
        increase efficiency!

        At one time, a Japanese company bought one of the first
        lasers for monstrous money and began to cut them
        ferrite heads for tape recorders
        the whole world at a "penny" cost with an amazing
        quality!
      8. 0
        April 6 2012 22: 47
        Well, there are no modern technologies that can surpass AK technology. Do you disagree? Give examples.
      9. Kamaz
        -1
        April 16 2012 17: 06
        Well actually! Why do we need a new same assault rifle if an old one of the same body armor flashes with the same success (or does not flash lol )
  2. JoylyRoger
    +7
    April 4 2012 09: 06
    Considering how many are produced, it may make sense to upgrade old designs by introducing some innovations on them.
    In addition to the possibility of a cut-off of 3 shots, I did not notice a particular principle.
    The use of trims for another sight and reloading handles on both sides, as well as the use of imported rifle grenades, should not be considered fundamental.
    Hence, IMHO is a purely export model, all this ergonomics, a telescopic butt for this
    1. 0
      April 4 2012 23: 41
      shutter delay. in my opinion, as well as for serious specialists (KARDEN, for example), this is a very important innovation. half a second to cocking the shutter in close fire contact can cost life ...
      1. +2
        April 6 2012 22: 55
        In combined arms combat, this delay does not matter. While you are changing the store, you are covered by a comrade
        the rest is from the evil one. For specialists, there is another weapon.
  3. +9
    April 4 2012 09: 06
    Everything is great! I just don't understand why they complicated the design with a cut-off for 3 rounds? If a professional will use all the trim that is planned, then he does not need this cut-off. And if the "monkey", then the old "Kalash" will suit her even better - there is nothing to break!
    We have a wonderful weapons school and production culture, and "Kalash" will be considered the Best for a long time! There is no need to try to imitate the Western culture of production in everything, otherwise we will catch up with them all our lives. We have our own way! I think that it is not worth making revolutionary changes to a design that has been tested over the years - enough has been done. The only thing that may need to be worked on is on new cartridge options. Now it's up to the military, who will test a new model in action.
    1. +9
      April 4 2012 13: 03
      When firing bursts, the first two rounds go to the target ... The bursts are used to create barrage ... I fired two rounds ... but the mixture is formed both when pressed and released ... and if you can control it when pressed, then it’s almost impossible when releasing ... When the cut-off, accuracy and accuracy increases ... I have twenty percent ... and with practical shooting it is a lot ... plus for raising the problem ...
    2. Mahamont
      +2
      April 4 2012 18: 52
      There is a cutoff of three rounds - 1000 rounds per minute. It is very convenient to quickly switch from one line of fire to another. At this speed, and the barrel does not have time to move, everything will fly away at the target.
    3. +2
      April 4 2012 20: 37
      A good special and in automatic mode can shoot single!
    4. +2
      April 4 2012 21: 34
      In general, that’s true ... A normal fighter cuts off 2 rounds each at shooting, at least we were taught this way, and very well taught, by the way
    5. 0
      April 6 2012 22: 58
      The only explanation is the desire to save on cartridges. I see no other meaning
  4. cvx
    cvx
    +3
    April 4 2012 09: 39
    The Picatinny rail is certainly good, but is it justified on the forend. Without the front handle, the grooves of this bar will rest in the palm of your hand.
  5. marauder
    +7
    April 4 2012 09: 41
    AK-12 is a commercial option. The Picatinny rail on the movable light cover is highly doubtful. The sight can shift from deformation of the cover. Additional trims and any body kit increase the total weight, but you begin to understand this only in the field.

    He will not be taken into the army due to the lack of obvious advantage. The bourgeois will go.
    1. prunx
      +4
      April 4 2012 12: 36
      All the same, the article must be read before scratching the comment.
  6. andrey903
    -2
    April 4 2012 09: 44
    The barrel can be made heavier, special cartridges can be adjusted for 9 mm, the more so the sleeves are the same. The gas piston can be made either lighter or from several parts
    1. marauder
      +3
      April 4 2012 10: 01
      Still need to clarify the heavy version is under 7.62x51 NATO (308WIN)
      Under this caliber, a normal machine is generally impossible to do. Actually, for this, they came up with an intermediate cartridge 7.62x39 because they cannot shoot bursts with a rifle cartridge. Or the weight you need to do 9 kg. like a Kalashnikov machine gun.

      And to replace SVD even smiled. They have been dreaming about this since 1963.

      Everything suggests that the designer decided to make money.
      At the teapots.
      1. Igor
        -1
        April 4 2012 13: 15
        Quote: Maroder
        Everything suggests that the designer decided to make money. At the dummies.


        In our country, many people think that an IQ soldier = an IQ teapot, so a Kalashnikov assault rifle for dummies will be a people's automaton.

        Quote: Maroder
        And to replace SVD even smiled. They have been dreaming about this since 1963.


        Don’t worry !!! Picatinny rails will be put on it and we will have a new CB.
  7. grizzlir
    +4
    April 4 2012 09: 54
    DRY +. Picatinny plane. When I first saw these teeth on the weapon photograph I was horrified. I can’t judge, I used other weapons more in the service, but the sticking teeth are not ergonomic and I need to clean between them, and the dirt will fill up perfectly. And also a tactical grip. I held it as a weapon with such a grip in my hands, if I honestly didn’t understand the point. It’s inconvenient. But I won’t argue about this, maybe I am too stiff on the classic position scheme for firing a machine gun.
    1. +5
      April 4 2012 10: 47
      I’ll support you, the Picatinny rail is nonsense, if you hang a sight there, when running, hitting the ground it will become loose, this is an unreliable mount. The side mount is much better and more reliable, even if you’re about to land in battle, an automatic throw machine will not loosen anything if you break the current sight. Our snipers, who were running with the SVD and were given the SV-98, just complained about it, the side mount was removed, and the backlash sight was behind the picatinny rail. The handle of transferring fire to the AK is nonsense, since due to the large size of the machine it gives only inconvenience, it would be normal for the AKSU but not for the AK, because you would have to stretch your arm out almost at full length. Butt looks flimsy somehow, it seems that when it falls, it comes off immediately. And with the rest of the improvements, you can upgrade the old AKs, but as an independent AK-12 machine, for me personally, it makes no sense. The changes are not so significant to purchase, but in the role of the modernization block will do. It would be better if the AEK-971 were modernized and put into service.
      1. +4
        April 4 2012 11: 06
        I’ll support you, the Picatinny rail is nonsense, if you hang a sight there, when running, hitting the ground it will become loose, this is an unreliable mount.
        the question is how to fix it? On my saiga with a shot for 1k, the sight did not go astray.
        Our snipers who ran with the SVD and were given the SV-98 just complained about it, the side mount was removed, and the backlash sight was behind the picatinny rail.
        Unfortunately, the SV-98 is one big misunderstanding.
        And with the rest of the improvements, you can upgrade the old AKs, but as an independent AK-12 machine, for me personally, it makes no sense.
        Well, this is AK modernization
        It would be better if the AEK-971 was modernized and put into service.
        And why, with a low-pulse cartridge, it is possible to shoot bursts at 100m accurately enough without problems.
    2. +4
      April 4 2012 11: 01
      I also tried (though I held the Belgian gun in my hands) The difference is and is huge (imperceptible at first) But when you start shooting precisely in movement or at long distances or in a room where there are a lot of angles and turns, then from that same handle more than workmate.
    3. +4
      April 4 2012 11: 09
      I can’t judge, of course, I used other weapons in the service, but the protruding teeth of ergonomics do not give.
      they don’t cling anywhere.
      Yes, and you need to clean between them, and the dirt will be perfectly packed there.
      So in any weapon it is necessary to clean and in critical conditions there will not be dirt to create problems
      And also a tactical grip. I held it as a weapon with such a grip in my hands, if I honestly didn’t understand the point. It’s inconvenient. But I won’t argue about this, maybe I am too stiff on the classic position scheme for firing a machine gun.
      No tactical handle makes it possible to quickly transfer fire at close range, but for me there is also a more ergonomic retention of weapons with ANY hand.
      1. +1
        April 4 2012 23: 56
        leon-iv, No, the tactical handle makes it possible to quickly transfer fire at close distances, but for me there is also a more ergonomic retention of weapons with ANY hand. leon-iv,


        a huge plus for you, Leon. I myself shoot relatively little in the service, but I VERY want a stick on my regular barrel.
    4. +1
      April 4 2012 21: 31
      Well, why ... the collimator, for example, makes shooting very easy, and the tactical grip is quite useful in assault operations, or in battles in the city, for example. In the forest, there, in the field, of course, its presence or absence is not critical, (again the same, you can either remove or install) but in the premises allows you to quickly transfer the aiming point
  8. Dmitry.V
    +6
    April 4 2012 10: 11
    I wish the Picatinny rail wasn’t empty.
  9. Owl
    +1
    April 4 2012 10: 26
    A full range of samples is required: in terms of ammunition 5,45x39, 7,62x39, 9x39 and in size (long and short barrel). From it, in the presence of a "body kit" and sights, it will be possible to choose samples for equipping units: 5,45x39 - for the army, 7,62x39 - for the Ministry of Internal Affairs, 7,62x39 and 9x39 - for the special forces of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Army and the FSB.
  10. +3
    April 4 2012 10: 27
    I have an AK clone - Saigu M3 in caliber 5.56x45. I often shoot. Previously, I used to shoot AK-74 quite often. So that's my personal opinion. With the announced improvements and the former reliability of the AK-12, the Kalash will once again become the best assault rifle in the world.
    As soon as IZHMASH launches the civilian version of the AK-12, I will be the first in line for the purchase. Since, what I would like to improve on my Saiga appeared on the AK-12.
  11. 0
    April 4 2012 10: 56
    I hope the accuracy of firing improves
    1. vylvyn
      +2
      April 4 2012 12: 07
      And due to what, picatinny slats?
      1. 0
        April 4 2012 12: 39
        there is no possibility of better retention of weapons and more ergonomic forms. and Sights Improvements.
        1. DrekerexeN
          +1
          April 4 2012 14: 06
          As well as the new DTC and more stringent tolerances for barrel quality.
  12. vylvyn
    +3
    April 4 2012 11: 38
    Above I read a comment about the horrors when cleaning the picotini strips from dirt. Have you seen a new butt? You can’t clean out any dirt from there. And in general there will be complete nonsense - cleaning the butt on the AK-12. At least develop a whole manual on the future cleaning of stocks on new Kalash. Such instruction in volume will overshadow the instruction in firing from the machine itself.
  13. larsky1
    +3
    April 4 2012 11: 40
    good weapon. We must give it to our security forces in the Caucasus, for testing. Let him bearded in the mountains
    1. vylvyn
      +4
      April 4 2012 12: 16
      So sure, Comrade Stalin! Just let the bearded men drive our drones through the mountains, for the development of which 4 billion rubles were spent. After all, we live in the age of the latest technology. The drones of all bearded men are driven to death in 30 minutes and the AK-12 is not needed. That's when the machine can carry its owner on its hump, and not vice versa, then it will be possible to drive with him in the mountains and in the valleys and forests.
  14. +3
    April 4 2012 11: 49
    I’m wondering, what can’t be done on the ak74 (if we really have 15 mil.) to put a new receiver cover with a picatinny rail.? she, as I recall, is completely removed?
    1. vylvyn
      +2
      April 4 2012 12: 22
      But this is the right question.
      1. +3
        April 4 2012 12: 40
        no maybe there is no HARD coupling. The meaning of such a sight, I do not see.
        AK 12 has another receiver cover.
    2. sergskak
      +2
      April 4 2012 14: 37
      And how do you make a gate delay there? In my opinion, this is the main modernization in the new AK, but I can’t argue with the rest about the old one.
      1. HOUSES
        +1
        April 4 2012 18: 09
        Yes, no one will remodel anything, the plant has not been sharpened for remaking, it is necessary to build a new one. But to sell stocks to some kind of commercial structure at the price of scrap metal, followed by conversion into civilian weapons ... Many would say thanks to the Minister of Defense, otherwise you know what rating he has in society. Oh yes, they are real estate sawing that there are some half a billion rubles.
  15. schonia06rus
    0
    April 4 2012 13: 13
    I have a question for the local ikspirtam, but on this machine, besides making it more ergonomic, did anything else change? picatinny rails can be successfully hung on a regular AK (including the forend), and the stock can be changed to a NATO stock (the company commander went with the AKM - all hung) there are no fundamental design changes, the rate of fire is the same. and our warriors like to "suppress the enemy with fire" (ie release the entire store at a time)
    And judging by the drawings with the assembly, this is the same AK.
    1. sergskak
      0
      April 4 2012 14: 42
      schonia06rus, Read above and understand that the bar and butt are far from the main thing.
    2. 0
      April 4 2012 16: 03
      I answer. In addition to changes in ergonomics, which in my opinion are quite successful, these are:
      1. Introduction of shutter lag. In combat, a very useful thing.
      2. The cocking handle of the shutter was transferred to the gas exhaust piston, and the cutout in the receiver cover was eliminated. In a combat situation, any Kaka will not get into the receiver, which greatly increases reliability. (I’m on a hunt for semi-automatic weapons in these cutouts, after climbing through the woods any kind of kaka fell and as a result - weapons failure, and if the same situation in the war?).
      3. Modified pool entry and rifling. Everyone missed this item, but in vain! This greatly affects the accuracy and accuracy of shooting.
      The above items allow you to talk about creating a new modification of the machine. These innovations can not be shoved into the old machine with its modernization.
      1. SIT
        +1
        April 4 2012 18: 52
        Quote: saruman
        Modified pool entry and rifling. Everyone missed this item, but in vain! This greatly affects the accuracy and accuracy of shooting.

        Hmm ... How did they change them? This is an interesting question. The cartridge is the same, but the rifling is different? Riveted 17 million. AK74 trunks and finally came to the conclusion that the rifling is wrong?
  16. cvx
    cvx
    +1
    April 4 2012 13: 14
    On the sleeve connecting the barrel and gas pipe there are also 3 teeth of the Picatinny rail. Why are they there? What for example can I hang there? In a shortened version of the machine, this sleeve is just aligned with the front sight.
    1. +1
      April 4 2012 13: 23
      For example, a laser or a collimator. But this is for CQB
    2. vylvyn
      +3
      April 4 2012 13: 28
      Apparently, the tactical handle will fit perfectly on these three prongs. There is simply nothing more to hang on. Well, the fun automatic turned out.

      And one more question remained behind the scenes - were the ramrod improved too, or what? It is interesting to see the ramrod type a la picatini.
    3. +1
      April 4 2012 17: 02
      Quote: cvx
      On the sleeve connecting the barrel and gas pipe there are also 3 teeth of the Picatinny rail. Why are they there? What for example can I hang there? In a shortened version of the machine, this sleeve is just aligned with the front sight.


      The possibility of installing a removable front sight is provided, in such a modification it is necessary to remove the front sight block from the trunk.
      1. 0
        April 5 2012 00: 46
        cool too, in my opinion.
  17. DrekerexeN
    +5
    April 4 2012 14: 04
    IMHO. There is nothing special to do with Kalashnikov. Just improve accuracy and ergonomics. All. The rest was invented already in 46 ...
  18. Igor Vladimirovich
    +1
    April 4 2012 15: 06
    Pretty boy!
  19. 0
    April 4 2012 16: 22
    Something he now resembles not AK, but either Galil, or an Indian assault rifle .... what
    At least we would have "bumped" him for a change what
    1. +1
      April 4 2012 16: 55
      tfu you get involved with bullapup. This kaki was not enough for us.
      1. 0
        April 4 2012 20: 35
        No, well, why such and such? request
        SVDhu won-zabulpapili, and what "Kalash" is worse? lol
        1. +1
          April 4 2012 21: 26
          Ukraine AK "bullied" how much their "Vepr" ("Vepr") became better than the AK-74, question ...
          1. 0
            April 4 2012 21: 30
            Yes, until you shoot, you won’t understand what
            1. 0
              April 5 2012 07: 58
              Yes, there is such a device, though not serial ....
            2. 0
              April 5 2012 08: 00
              Although ... There is still such a device, not serial, though ...
          2. 0
            April 4 2012 21: 40
            we have OTs-14 many do not like.
          3. +2
            April 4 2012 21: 56
            AK of high-quality production until 1985 could well be upgraded like this.
            experience of the Moscow enterprise Zenit
            1. DrekerexeN
              0
              April 5 2012 14: 54
              Zenit kit you know how much it costs ???
              1. vylvyn
                0
                April 6 2012 08: 00
                Sorry, but free and cheap now it’s not profitable to fight. It would be beneficial - they would still have fought with clubs and sticks, like 1000000 years before our era. True, the cudgel does not take oil from Iraq.
            2. vylvyn
              0
              April 6 2012 08: 15
              Class. It was necessary to supplement the body kit not with a tactical handle, but with a grenade launcher. It would be really cool.
          4. vylvyn
            0
            April 6 2012 07: 56
            Their bullpup with a grenade launcher weighs like an AK-74 without a body kit.
  20. serezha.fedotoff2013
    +1
    April 4 2012 18: 06

    ghjuynjkkihhyyyyyyy

    Quote: Landwarrior
    Something he now resembles not AK, but Galil,

    Galil is essentially a modification of AK
    1. 0
      April 4 2012 20: 36
      I am aware of what is galil inside. wink
      I'm talking about the appearance
  21. +1
    April 4 2012 21: 23
    In any case, I would love to have this unit for personal use.
  22. 0
    April 4 2012 22: 28
    Quote: saruman
    As soon as IZHMASH launches the civilian version of the AK-12, I will be the first in line for the purchase.
    And I, too, because everything necessary for AK modernization was announced, except for the store receiver (I think that only because a new store for 30 for the widespread ammunition would be needed) And I’ll purchase exactly 7,62? 51 (I love the bolistica). Respectfully.
  23. 0
    April 4 2012 22: 56
    The fact that they carried out the alteration of the mechanics and the barrel is very good, and has long been a necessary thing. But outwardly, a solid comb. Of course, I understand you need a body kit, but try to wear the machine around the clock. The weapon should "caress" the hand, and vice versa. The fastening strips should be improved.
    1. vylvyn
      -1
      April 6 2012 08: 10
      If you want to live, you will yearn for five years. They dragged me to my service for a month at the AKM exercises with full ammunition. We are all alive and well, but the conditional opponent was completely destroyed.

      The whole question is not how much the machine gun weighs, but how much the ammunition weighs for it. Compared to wearable (even regular) ammunition, the machine is like a feather. The body kit of the type of sights allows you to reduce the number of wearable cartridges while increasing the efficiency of their use at times.
      1. wk
        0
        April 8 2012 03: 38
        Quote: vylvyn
        Body kit like sights allows you to reduce the number of wearable cartridges while increasing efficiency

        for this, a regular mount is enough .... in battle, all this countless number of "gadgets" is not needed, but for filming an action movie - perhaps there is not enough strap for a suspended crossbow or catapult ..... if you carried AKM for a month, I did not say such nonsense.
        1. vylvyn
          +1
          April 8 2012 05: 04
          Dragged and dragged. This usually does not believe either those who did not serve, or served in the culinary troops.

          I read your comments, something stuck in the movie. All filming, yes filming.

          By the way, I don’t remember writing in my last comment about "countless gadgets, about the standard mount and the picatinny rail". I wrote ABOUT SIGHTS (calimator or optical - this is optional) AND ABOUT AMMUNITION. I wrote it in big letters so that I could see it better. And the fact that you attributed your words to me are your words, not mine, I DIDN'T SAY that.

          From the body kit I am for sights, a grenade launcher, and a bayonet-knife. Everything else is for mushroom pickers and zoologists. And I know how to make a tactical grip out of a machine’s shoulder strap. It turns out better than plastic. The echo of war.
          (PS - I know that minus is not from you)
  24. +1
    April 4 2012 22: 57
    The IzhMashevites, of course, are Malays, who got down to business, but somehow through a stump-deck .... Namely, three years ago, amers began the process of recalling M-4 from divisions, for alteration, in factory facilities, USM-s are being removed cutoffs for three cartridges to shit as unjustified the expected tactical capabilities and turned out to be completely unclaimed in practice, but only complicating the mechanism and introducing confusion with the manipulations of the translator of the fire mode in combat conditions. But I’m still wondering - where is it here (or even "not here") who met "foreign-made rifle grenades" scattered or in packages? I have not seen, I have overlooked. Or will they buy grenades !! ?? recourse Many questions to the Izhevsk people ...
    IMHO. With the good old Kalash of work - an unplowed field!
    PySy: for some reason, it seems that as a result of improvements to the AK-12, changes to the design in it, and the elimination of comments, one hell will work .. Yes! Is he! Eternal AKM !!! good
  25. toguns
    0
    April 4 2012 22: 59
    drinks more of these weapons in our valiant troops.
  26. dred
    -1
    April 5 2012 13: 11
    Well, more became beautiful.
  27. 0
    April 5 2012 19: 19
    Quote: sedoii
    try vilifying the machine around the clock.
    For the amateur, of course, but tactical gloves helped me. But the idea is correct.
  28. wk
    0
    April 7 2012 12: 19
    pasting with an unnecessary number of planks .... made an unnecessary cut-off on the 3rd cartridge (at the existing rate of fire the 3rd cartridge will fly past) the machine will surely be harder, but it will look beautiful in the shootings of militants, where all its strips are surrounded by flashlights, sights, Swiss knives, .. with bows ...
    1. artem9570
      0
      22 October 2012 12: 32
      with loose shotguns as in COD MW 2 u 3. plus a border will be hung on the shot and a bumblebee will be placed on the last flame to put the tanks out
  29. artem9570
    0
    22 October 2012 12: 29
    oh my god well and the fearsman.
  30. 0
    26 May 2014 15: 56
    AK is classic
  31. 0
    31 December 2014 14: 59
    The shutter was stopped as on the Austrian "SIG SG-55x", but it would have been more successful to make it so that the bolt carrier was dropped by the hand controlling the fire. Or the trigger itself, when pressed, did a reset (which is very convenient, since you do not need additional movements and inspection of the "de enta spendyurk?"). Or an additional lever in the same trigger guard, but in front of the finger.

    But it’s better if the shutter release itself releases the shutter.