News of the program "Warrior": details of trial operation

44
In 2011, the Russian defense industry for the first time unveiled the Ratnik military equipment kit (KBEV). After carrying out a number of necessary checks, the kit received military approval and entered mass production. Every year, the army receives several tens of thousands of such kits. Over the past few years, the military and industry experts conducted the necessary tests, in which various information was collected about the kit as a whole and its individual components. Now some details of the checks are known.

Not so long ago, the newspaper of the Ministry of Defense "Krasnaya Zvezda" began publishing a series of articles written by Yuri Avdeev on the state and prospects of the KBEV "Ratnik". So, on November 19 was published the material “Warrior” with an eye to the future. ” Exactly a week later, the article “Digitized“ Warrior ”was published, continuing the story about the latest domestic developments. Apparently, in the very near future, the cycle will continue with a new article, but already published publications are of great interest. Consider the published data about the "Warrior".



News of the program "Warrior": details of trial operation


In the first article - “Warrior” with an eye to the future ”- it was noted that some of the components of the perspective equipment had already been accepted for the supply of the armed forces. At the same time, the testing of new products and the development of the whole complex does not stop. Simultaneously with the improvement of already existing components of the “Warrior”, new projects of one kind or another are being developed. The goals of the current work are defined, and now the specialists are working on solving the current tasks.

In general, the “Warrior” project provides for the creation of a promising innovation system that has life support functions and increases the efficiency of solving combat missions. Currently, the industry is engaged in the creation and improvement of individual instrumentation equipment. Communication, navigation, targeting, etc. controls have a special priority. A modular approach to building equipment is also actively used.

As repeatedly stated earlier, all the means of the “Warrior” are summarized in five basic systems. A set of combat equipment includes a system of destruction, protection, life support, control and power supply. In this case, the composition of individual systems may vary in accordance with certain requirements.

In March 2015 of the year, it was decided to launch the controlled operation of KBEV Ratnik. During the execution of this instruction, special groups for the collection, processing and analysis of information were organized in the troops. The control units of different types of troops operate the “Warrior” kits, and also interact with information gathering groups. The operation of both the entire complex and its individual elements is being studied. According to the results of the exploitation analysis, the industry receives certain instructions concerning the further development of systems.

Several research organizations are involved in data analysis. According to the Red Star, the 3 Central Research Institute of the Ministry of Defense, the 27 Central Research Institute of the Ministry of Defense, the Main Scientific Research Testing Center of Robotics, the Mikhailovsky Military Artillery Academy, the Military Academy of Military Air Defense and other organizations participate in such works. For example, the role of the 3 Central Research Institute of the Ministry of Defense is in mathematical modeling, allowing to evaluate the results of certain improvements in the context of the combat use of systems.

The article "Digitized" Warrior "indicates that the control groups of military personnel are almost fully equipped with products of the promising KBEV. So, the fighters used body armor like 6B45 with modular transport system, armor 6B47, camouflage set 6Ш122, joint protection kit, patrol satchel, gas mask with bag, etc. Similar products were used by fighters as part of tactical, physical, fire and engineering training. The servicemen also checked the compatibility of the “Warrior” kits with existing vehicles and combat vehicles.

It is indicated that the initial level of training of control units was the same. They practiced by the same methods; tactical conditions and instructions for solving the tasks set were also not different. The skills and abilities of the fighters were tested using both existing and advanced equipment. This made it possible to compare the results and draw conclusions about the characteristics of the KBEV “Warrior”. As part of pilot operation, the control units worked using new systems for about 500 hours.

Interesting results were obtained in the study of the defeat system, which is part of the "Warrior". During trial operation, the specialists compared two pairs of automata. These were products AK-12 and 6P67 chambered for 5,45х39 mm, as well as 7,62-mm assault rifles AK-15 and 6P68. Machines were compared with each other, and with the standard armament of the army. Study of weapons carried out on the basis of motorized rifle divisions, marines and airborne troops.

A comparison of automata showed that AK-12 and 6P67 products have both advantages and disadvantages. At distances up to 300, the 6P67 submachine gun shows 1,1 times greater fire efficiency. At distances over 300 m, the AK-12 submachine gun shows superiority. At the same time, the advanced weapons were compared with the standard AK-74M machine gun. AK-12 and AK-15 products showed a twofold superiority, and the efficiency of the 6P67 fire is higher by 2,3.

AK-74M machines were tested both in the initial configuration and with a set of additional equipment, formed in the framework of the Aves design work. Thanks to additional devices, shooting accuracy improved 1,3 times in comparison with the base machine. At the same time, some problems arose in the context of weapons service. Thus, the incomplete disassembly of the AK-74M with a “body kit” takes on average 47,5 seconds, whereas the initial automaton can be disassembled in 12,1 seconds. Assembling a weapon from such a state takes 18,6 with (basic AK-74М) or 84 with (“body kit”). According to the results of testing the results of the ROC Obves, the industry received some recommendations. At the beginning of 2017, she presented an updated version of the machine with additional equipment.

Along with the weapons tested means of observation and aiming. These works were carried out in four stages. The first two were to issue products to the personnel, followed by their study and assignment to the soldiers. The third stage provided for the training of personnel in the light and dark hours of the day. As part of the final stage of testing, experiments were conducted that involved changing the quantitative composition of the sighting devices in the subunit.

It is reported that the use of "Warrior" leads to positive results in some areas and to inconvenience in others. Thus, it was determined that the new equipment does not adversely affect the results of the fighters in the context of fire training. In addition, there is an increase in indicators in tactical training. Soldiers get the opportunity to quickly deal with their combat mission.

At the same time, the presence of a large number of various means leads to an increase in the mass and volume of a soldier in full gear. This adversely affects the usability. Embarking and disembarking a combat vehicle takes 2,3 times as much time, and the grenade throw distance is reduced by 3-7 m.

As already mentioned, the experts of the 3 Central Research Institute of the Ministry of Defense performed mathematical modeling and determined the increase in combat effectiveness. It was found that when equipping the reinforced battalion of the ground forces of the KBEV “Warrior”, losses are reduced by 12%. Ammunition consumption increases by 5%. The enemy has the opportunity to penetrate into our positions to a depth of no more than 50-200 m, and in some situations his progress is excluded. It was also determined that in a dueling firefight, the number of targets hit grows.

"Red Star" also reveals the plans of the Ministry of Defense for the last months of this year. Before the start of 2018, it was supposed to complete the control operation of a number of new devices. It was about new means of intelligence, observation and aiming. In addition, several prospective sniper rifles should be completed in the near future. These are products of SVDM, VSSM and ASVKM. After all this, the Ministry of Defense will gather a coordination and scientific council, which is to discuss the results of the latest tests.

The final of the program of tests and inspections will be the development of new proposals that will be used in the course of further work. New proposals and refined requirements will be taken into account in subsequent development work, the purpose of which is to create a promising complete set of combat equipment of a soldier under the code "Warrior-3". This work will continue over the next few years.

***

Deliveries of the “Warrior” kits of the existing modifications started a few years ago. Since then, a number of defense industry organizations involved in the program have created a full set of necessary equipment, and also carried out several upgrades to individual products. All the main components of KBRA "Warrior" are in mass production and in large quantities are supplied to the armed forces.



According to previously published data, in the 2014-15 years, the army handed over more than 70 thousand sets of "Warrior" with all the necessary equipment and products. Later, representatives of the military department noted that annually the armed forces will receive 50 thousand sets. At the same time, the possibility of increasing rates with a noticeable increase in supply volumes was not excluded. In parallel with the procurement of new equipment, the military department conducted various tests on the basis of combatant units. Based on the audit results, recommendations were made regarding the further development of the tested systems. In addition, preparations were made to create a new generation of the kit.

At present, specialists from a number of organizations of the Ministry of Defense are completing ongoing tests of the KBEV “Warrior” in the existing configuration with an up-to-date set of equipment, weapons, protection and electronic equipment. In the course of such tests, it is planned not only to reveal the real characteristics and capabilities of the systems, but also to determine the further development paths of the kit. New recommendations, which should appear in the near future, will be taken into account in promising projects of the program "Warrior-3".

Earlier it was claimed that the next “generation” of the “Warrior” kit will appear at the end of the current or the beginning of the next decade. It will have certain advantages over existing systems, achieved through the use of updated tools and components. When creating new products will be taken into account operating experience and testing of existing ones.

The kit of combat equipment of a soldier “Warrior” includes several dozen products of different classes and different purposes. All of them are reduced to five systems responsible for solving various tasks of a combat or auxiliary character. The components of the kit, shortly after their appearance, passed the necessary tests, after which they were recommended for introduction into the “Warrior”. Then, after the appearance of a complete set, tests started, in which all products are studied together, during their full use.

Joint tests of the CBEV assembly allow for the timely identification of certain problems with the interaction of components, as well as to identify and note the positive qualities of the products. Thus, according to the results of all current work, the army will be able to receive a complete set of equipment that fully complies with current requirements. In addition, current work predetermines the course of promising projects, the creation of which will start in the near future.

It is important that the military department in the person of official representatives and its own newspaper regularly announces certain results of various works, including the “Warrior” program. Thanks to this, those interested get food for thought, and society as a whole is another reason to be proud of their armed forces.


Based on:
http://redstar.ru/index.php/newspaper/item/35117-ratnik-s-pritselom-na-budushchee
http://redstar.ru/index.php/newspaper/item/35204-otsifrovannyj-ratnik
http: /rg.ru/
http://tass.ru/
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    29 November 2017 06: 45
    The next stage in the development of combat equipment is the built-in eco-skeleton, which is already being slowly tested in different countries.
    1. +1
      29 November 2017 07: 46
      I agree, but his problem, as in many other areas, is a compact power supply of sufficient capacity. Lately, here and there one has heard about breakthroughs in this matter, but nothing has come to production yet.
      1. 0
        29 November 2017 08: 10
        And how do you like the small “dynamos” built into the soles, and the battery-energy storage in the form of a trouser belt?
        1. +1
          29 November 2017 11: 08
          more fun:
          http://dvs.ugatu.ac.ru/index.php?id=125&Itemi
          d = 62 & option = com_content & view = article

          and at the same time charging of power-consuming devices is provided ...
          1. 0
            29 November 2017 11: 34
            The problem is the efficiency of such a scheme. The energy received as a result of mechanical actions, such as steps, is enough only for a flashlight. But certainly not for the work of exoskeletons.
        2. +1
          29 November 2017 11: 46
          And how do you like the small “dynamos” built into the soles, and the battery-energy storage in the form of a trouser belt?

          For an exoskeleton, kilowatts of energy will be needed, it is unlikely that your option, at the current stage of technology development, will provide the required efficiency.
        3. 0
          1 December 2017 04: 43
          Well, if only nuclear .. laughing
    2. +13
      29 November 2017 12: 27
      Absolutely empty, useless article .. Anyone can write such a thing without getting off the couch .. Empty scientific findings without a grain of information ... Sorry for the lost reading time ... Such authors must be multiplied by zero, full "0" with a well-defined phraseology. ..
      1. 0
        29 November 2017 13: 38
        Well, you can’t even have fun?
      2. +4
        29 November 2017 15: 46
        Quote: okko077
        Such authors ....

        You are up to this author, as to the moon cancer. You can better - portray, and we will compare.
        1. +1
          29 November 2017 19: 15
          Yes, the author achieved great perfection in the ability to transfuse “from one to another”, almost like Tolkien.
        2. +3
          29 November 2017 19: 37
          From the past, chew if you can cancer ...
          Armor of the future: the latest equipment "Warrior" for 60 seconds
          What are the armor of the future? What nonsense? Modern military operations do not provide for military contact of soldiers on the battlefield with the enemy ... All technological progress, or rather its use in the army, is directed to this. They try to exclude this contact with the help of technical and surveillance equipment in all advanced armies ... In all but ours ... We will only stack our best fighters at the stage of searching for the enemy ... And I think that it will be ultraviolet, which they will die in the best outfit in the world, without even seeing who or what killed them and where they were shooting from ... Blind kittens will rush around, not having the slightest idea about the enemy, but computer technology will count them, determine their coordinates , take the pulse and ammo and transmit it to the CP, where their blind commanders will sit and watch this stupid action on the air ... I wonder how this will help defeat an unidentified enemy ??? The technique should help determine where the enemy is located in the first place. It’s clear to you .... When our ..... not quite smart generals understand this ....
          1. +2
            30 November 2017 07: 30
            Ok, let's continue the conversation. First, I talked about your attitude to the author of the article, and not about the "armor of the future." Read his articles and, if objective, of course, understand what I mean.
            Secondly, if you know something about "modern military operations that do not provide for military contact of soldiers on the battlefield with the enemy," give examples. Immediately, Hiroshima and Yugoslavia did not offer, this is from another opera.
            Third - you yourself used the "warrior" to talk about "blind kittens"?
            1. +1
              30 November 2017 10: 11
              First I set my priorities ... I am not against the Warrior as protection, but the information component, the innovative part, is moving in the wrong direction with the easy hands of our idiots ... Instead of counting and controlling the fighters and everything and transmitting this information that is not clear why the commander, instead of the uselessness of the junk of events, you must first find the enemy, provide target designation .... All this can and is necessary, but secondly, first you need to first detect the enemy, detect remotely, without fire contact, in advance, on every small piece combat zone .... And the author is sideways: Of particular priority are communications, navigation controls, target designation, etc. So at the end by the way. Or I forgot at all: As repeatedly indicated earlier, all the tools of the "Warrior" are summarized in five basic systems. A set of combat equipment includes a system of destruction, protection, life support, control and energy supply.
              ,
              1. +1
                30 November 2017 10: 52
                We have such an approach in the army to everything. We are developing the latest weapons systems, but we are not developing systems for providing target designation for them in real time based on modern information technologies ... Why do we need new systems with advanced capabilities if they do not know WHERE TO SHOOT? Why do we need high-precision weapons, if the coordinates for it are determined by reconnaissance spotters on the back of the enemy with binoculars and a walkie-talkie in the TEETH? And they believe that it should be so, that this is correct. One half-fool said with pleasure that it would be possible to set goals even for strategic bombers .... Such a DEBILY approach would lead to unjustified losses of elite units in the event of a real military conflict using conventional weapons only at the stage of enemy search .... We are being prepared for the new 41 year ... We are not ready in this regard and again, "Spike on feet of clay" ?! And our General Staff does nothing to correct this situation ... This crime is the result of the stupidity and short-sightedness of our military leadership, which does not understand the drama of the situation ... It hopes to hide behind a nuclear club ... These idiots must be stopped ... Most interesting that there is no lag, there is misunderstanding, complacency, complacency and stupidity .... We can do everything, but "comrades do not understand" ....
              2. +2
                30 November 2017 11: 13
                I assume that information is exchanged in both directions. And if the “bottom up” is what you call “trash”, then the “top down” is just target designation. For "remote detection" should be used the means of the senior manager and the higher education institution (higher management links) bring the information to the carriers of the "Warrior". Maybe the author of the article did not fully reflect the issue of transmitting information precisely from the top down, but this, in my opinion, is what the least should be known on the side, and the fact that the fighter’s pulse rate goes up ... maybe someone needs it (I'll start :-)), or maybe it's a joke. In general, Kirill Ryabov's articles differ in a fair amount of knowledge of the material and its intelligible presentation. Probably not everything could be voiced in the article (IMHO).
                1. 0
                  30 November 2017 11: 40
                  And the information from above, in the original source, comes from the same group on the battlefield in the warrior 3 hours late, when everyone has already been killed ... or did the pilot broadcast by radio or did he see the astronaut from the side into the telescope? Or is her "giving birth" to a higher headquarters? You are told that we do not have the technical means of observing and detecting the enemy for real-time target designation, and you that not everything can be voiced ??? You can replace Gerasimov, you have the same mindset!
                  1. +2
                    30 November 2017 11: 48
                    Quote: okko077
                    we do not have technical means of observation and detection of the enemy
                    Do you have a question about our latest developments in the field of intelligence systems? Then I envy. And if you just throw it on the fan, then there’s nothing more to talk about.
            2. 0
              30 November 2017 12: 04
              About Hiroshima and YugoslaviaI didn’t appreciate the joke ... Although everything is standard in Yugoslavia. The first stage is the destruction of air defense and infrastructure facilities ... The second destruction of the centers of resistance from the air. And the third, cleaning up the centers of resistance with the possibility of combat contact, after processing by artillery .... Possible combat contact is already at the third level! ... This is from that opera, we don’t even remember Iraq .... What doesn’t suit you?
              Now aboutUSED"... No, I'm from the Air Force ... But we have an opinion on the forum, or rather a few words of practitioners in comments are more valuable than 10 such articles .. I read them carefully, with respect to the authors ...
              1. +2
                30 November 2017 12: 19
                About Hiroshima and Yugoslavia is not a joke, but an example of "military operations that do not involve combat contact of soldiers on the battlefield with the enemy." From the last comment I realized that you confuse the warm with the soft, basing your opinion on the opinions from the forum. The ability to remotely destroy the enemy does not detract from the need to protect the infantry, which will clear the area with the possibility of "combat contact", which is "already at the third level." I would recommend less peremptory judgments, especially when you yourself are not involved in the process. For sim finish. Good luck on the forums.
          2. +2
            30 November 2017 19: 41
            Quote: okko077
            Modern military operations do not provide for combat contact of soldiers on the battlefield with the enemy ...

            Think about it when you gut your guts on a bayonet am
            1. +1
              4 December 2017 09: 47
              Or when you cover type caliber.
  2. +4
    29 November 2017 07: 59
    Will the second company / battalion volley grow? How is target designation in a warrior?
    For fans of elephant bombs and other rifle prodigies, I remind you: 80 percent of the enemy’s manpower and virtually all the battlefield equipment is carried out by artillery and aircraft.
    I would be very pleased to read about the presence in the warrior of a device in each compartment that allows you to transmit the coordinates of the target, with the possibility of choosing the means of destruction, from AGS / mortars to 152mm / front-line aviation.
    1. +1
      29 November 2017 09: 29
      For fans of elephant bombs and other rifle prodigies, I remind you: 80 percent of the enemy’s manpower and virtually all the battlefield equipment is carried out by artillery and aircraft.


      And also in every modern military conflict, the statistics of losses is approximately the following: 70 percent from fragments, 30 from bullets and other factors.
  3. +4
    29 November 2017 08: 16
    Thus, incomplete disassembly of the AK-74M with the “Bodykit” takes an average of 47,5 s, while the original machine can be disassembled in 12,1 s. Assembling weapons from this state takes 18,6 seconds (base AK-74M) or 84 seconds (“body kit”). Based on the results of checking the results of OKR “Obves”, the industry received some recommendations. At the beginning of 2017, she presented an updated version of the machine with additional equipment.
    Lord .... But who needs to disassemble the machine on the battlefield? If the enemy is 20 meters away, disassembly will not help you, if you can always find shelter or another machine gun (90% sure that in battle you still can’t fix the problem if disassembly is necessary) ...
    PS: in general, I liked the article in everything except:
    1) these coefficients and percentages everywhere taken from a spherical vacuum horse (apparently learned from the Yankees, but neither MICH allows you to get 11% more information on a battle meal compared to PASG)
    2) when, when he will not be reported to everyone in the army ...
    1. 0
      29 November 2017 08: 46
      All right, this is not necessary for everyone.
      1. +1
        29 November 2017 09: 36
        In my opinion everyone needs:
        1) Tile (unloading vest with the possibility of installing armor plates) with the Prayer system
        2) The belt is also mole
        3) Everything that clings to these moles
        4) The choice of armor plates, according to the situation and profession
        5) Collimator / optics
        6) walkie-talkie
        7) NVD, greenhouses, etc. already depends on the budget and specialty
        All sorts of GPS, glanas, etc., it is enough to issue a commander’s platoon or of a department + to equip a vehicle
        Well, it’s enough to equip the usual Ak-74M with a picatini on the barrel lid (although I don’t know how reliable it is, can anyone hear the reviews from the new aka with this mount?)
  4. +3
    29 November 2017 08: 44
    Already wrote briefly on the account of the raid backpack. I understand that it should be difficult in the army, but still.
    According to the claimed characteristics, the volume of 65 liters, load capacity 50 kg. Has anyone checked the strength of the hardware at a temperature of say - 25 and a load of 35 kg? Purely visually, it looks like handicraft made in an underground workshop by labor migrants. Numerous side straps are a great help for moving around the bush, they also serve as a snow accumulator in wet snow. Net weight 3.5 kg, which is typical for backpacks with a machine tool or ordinary 120 liters.
    Imagine a loaded raid backpack standing next to you and you need to rearrange it a little to the side, well? Conveniently ?
    Particular attention was paid to the chest retainer (mounts for the camera?), Why is it located so low? So that the belly does not bulge? It would be all right, because it (the lock) on the backpacks is removable and its location can be changed, but we are dealing with a raid backpack, apparently for this reason it is sewn tightly on one side! I feel without the Chinese here. The back design is acceptable, albeit not modern.
    Army goods advertising is surprisingly cheap.
    1. 0
      29 January 2018 22: 52
      And google is not fate? Already have a bunch of reviews)


  5. +1
    29 November 2017 09: 03
    The set of combat equipment of a military man “Ratnik” includes several dozen products of different classes and for various purposes. All of them are summarized in five systems responsible for solving certain combat or auxiliary tasks.
    As soon as I hear about dozens of products, I immediately get scared))) I imagine how in the field all this will break, get lost, etc. I can imagine how a sergeant-double bass, wise by experience, will beat the playful little hands of perfume-smells climbing into various ZHPS-GLONAS, with the words: given out !? - nyahvy hang, necho Iago touch !!!
    But seriously, the kit looks complicated and bloated by nomenclature .. My only visible solution is the unification and integration of systems in one product. For example: a helmet helmet: why not unify with a gas mask, goggles and a display device ... Fiction !? Who would argue! but we must strive for this)))
    1. 0
      29 November 2017 09: 30
      will peck at the playful little hands of perfume-smells climbing into various kinds of ZHPS-GLONAS, with the words: given out !? - nyahvy hang, necho Iago touch !!!


      Including this they do not give out laughing
    2. 0
      29 November 2017 21: 23
      You forgot another rubber woman with a gas mask. So that in moments of calm the fighter could strain.
  6. +2
    29 November 2017 09: 07
    For some reason there is no evaluation of machines under 7,62.
  7. +1
    29 November 2017 10: 22
    When I look at photos of Russian soldiers in new outfits, it touches me the most about how they became like American soldiers, moreover, 5-10 years ago. Americans are of course "dumb s", but I want to look like them. lol
    1. +2
      29 November 2017 11: 05
      Similar tasks, similar solutions. And what else should a soldier look like?
      1. +2
        29 November 2017 11: 11
        If there are solutions worked out by other people, why not use it? Yes, we are lagging behind, but now we are catching up quite well, although judging by the equipment and colors of the special equipment (and the reviews too), the quality and functionality have not yet shone. Let's hope that in the near future everything will develop and improve
      2. 0
        5 December 2017 22: 35
        Quote: Izotovp
        Similar tasks, similar solutions. And what else should a soldier look like?

        The main thing here
        Quote: stone
        moreover, 5-10 years ago
        , but they say a breakthrough! It has no analogues .. wink
  8. 0
    29 November 2017 15: 52
    50k is not enough at such a pace until 2050 we will introduce them ((they have a wearing period of 3 years at best.
  9. +1
    29 November 2017 20: 50
    Just the other day we were discussing a similar article where we were discussing weapons for the Warrior program. If they compared the AK-12 and AEK-971, then the AK-12 and 6P67 are already being compared. The main thing is that the AK-12 is lit everywhere. As the best, most approved by all, the most famous. AND SUCH EMISSIONS ARE DONE ON ORDER 1-2 times a month. Prepare public opinion.
  10. 0
    30 November 2017 00: 12
    It is very interesting to watch the clash of two assault rifles when, against my background, a more promising, in my opinion, ADS assault rifle with a built-in grenade launcher is adopted.
    1. +1
      30 November 2017 02: 10
      ADS is a special category for highly specialized submarine fighters.
      What relation can it even have to "linear" ground parts?
      1. 0
        30 November 2017 07: 45
        In the simplified version, without the possibility of shooting under water, it’s quite.
  11. +1
    5 December 2017 02: 47
    thermal imagers are outdated while they invented the warrior, now in the west new multimpectral ones that see through glass and are distinguishable by color at night with fog. 2. This is what all the info should be displayed on the helmet like the pilots so as not to be distracted by the tablets.
  12. 0
    5 December 2017 22: 38
    Quote: d ^ Amir
    more fun:
    http://dvs.ugatu.ac.ru/index.php?id=125&Itemi
    d = 62 & option = com_content & view = article

    and at the same time charging of power-consuming devices is provided ...

    These boots gasoline-powered walkers work, not on electricity. They do not work badly and consume little fuel, but it is impossible to navigate inside them secretly)))