Onshore Mobile Artillery Complex A-222 "Bereg"

53
The coastal defense system "Bereg" is designed to destroy surface ships of small and medium displacement with speed characteristics up to one hundred knots, with a detection radius of up to 35 kilometers and a range of up to 22 kilometers. It is also possible to use this artillery system for the destruction of ground objects. The advantages of the artillery system are large caliber, high versatility, both in terms of targets and in the ammunition used, the choice of operating mode, high overall rate of fire. Art systems with similar characteristics no one else in the world produced.

Onshore Mobile Artillery Complex A-222 "Bereg"


In the Soviet Union, in addition to missile anti-ship complexes, artillery complexes were used to protect the coast. Like the SCRC, the art complexes were mobile and stationary. The 130 mm SM-4 mobile complex, by the end of 70, was morally obsolete — low mobility characteristics and outdated control equipment made it unsuitable for modern defense tasks of the Soviet coast. In 1976, work begins on the creation of the newest 130 mm mobile complex A-222 called “Bereg”. The main developer of the central design office "Titan", the manufacturer of software "Barricades". The artillery part of the AK-130 aka ZIF-94 was taken as the base of the artillery unit of the new complex, and some elements from the 152 mm howitzer of the self-propelled type 2С-19 Msta were used - in particular, they used the elements of the swinging part. The trunk of the new mobile art complex received an increased muzzle brake and an ejector located in the center of the barrel. The fire rate of the A-222 “Bereg” gun has fallen compared to the AK-130 stationary analogue vehicle almost 4 times.
By 1980, the technical design of the new self-propelled coastal 130 mm complex A-222 "Coast" was completely ready. It is transferred to the main project producer of the Central Design Bureau “Titan” - the production association “Barricades”. But the project did not immediately go into production - the workload of the enterprise affected by the production of missile systems affected. The first prototype 130 mm artillery complex was created in 1988. Until 1992, the A-222 Shore was tested at the Feodosia training ground. At state tests, the self-propelled artillery complex showed itself in its own glory - the established target was destroyed in front of the military representatives. The public saw the A-222 Shore at the 1993 Abu Dhabi Military Technology Salon. 1996 year. MAK A-222 "Coast" is taken into service by the Russian Navy. 2003 year. IAC A-222 demonstrate the head of the military department of Russia S. Ivanov. A month later, the first production copy of the A-222 “Shore” is part of the fortieth BRAP, which is part of the Black Sea fleet and located near Novorossiysk.



The composition of the MAC "Bereg":
- 4-6 self-propelled gun mounts with a caliber 130-mm;
- Mobile CPU with SU MP-195;
- 1-2 machine OBD.
The whole complex has as a base MAZ-543M with the formula wheel 8х8.

Self-propelled artillery unit MAC A-222
The ACS is provided with an 130 mm caliber gun, which is mounted on a rotating-type rotary device in the form of a roller special bearing. An electromechanical system is used for pointing the instrument with the following pointing modes:
- automatic mode - occurs on incoming digital codes from the central post;
- semi-automatic mode - carried out by the gunner with the help of sighting equipment ACS;
The semi-automatic mode is used in case of breakage of communication with the central post and OBD machines. The autonomy of each ACS MAC "Bereg" significantly increases the overall survivability of the complex. In the SAU tower, spaces for the crew are equipped: loaders, gunner and commander 4-x. The commanding position is provided by the control unit of all internal and external ACS systems and a full range of instruments for guidance, surveillance, firing, communications and life support of the ACS. The gunner’s site is provided with surveillance, guidance, communications and lighting control devices. Two workplaces of loaders are located near the supply trays along the gun barrel. The other two loader jobs are located near the ammunition and ammunition loading device. Also in the tower are 2 stacking for 40 unitary type ammunition. The inner part of the tower has a synthetic coating - to absorb external sound effects and heat. Almost all the mechanisms in the tower ACS are sealed. To reduce the gas content inside the tower, a fan is used, the air intake for which is carried out through a pipe on the roof.



Before the start of firing, the SAU will level out the 4 jacks, which provide the chassis with the necessary rigidity for combat use. Movement during firing is possible - it will be taken into account by the system of introduced amendments, which includes an optical viewfinder and roll sensors. A power compartment was installed on the chassis, near the mobile tower, which provides the drive for the amplifiers to provide guidance, there is also a generator for the operation of jacks, batteries, power supply systems, firing control and guidance.


CP IAC "Coast"
The central station includes: a fire control system BR-136 with optical-electronic and radar channels for detecting and maintaining detected targets, and equipment for communication and life support. The installed fire control system provides a predetermined or circular view of the coastal situation at any time, day and night. The LMS can detect and maintain objects with active or passive counteraction. OWC features:
- support to 4 goals;
- ensuring the firing of any SPG on 2-m objects, both at sea and on land.
After firing at one of the targets, the BR-136 fire control system can instantly organize firing at the next accompanied object. The BR-136 calculates the guidance parameters of all ACSs based on the motion parameters of the detected objects using the center pickup mode, the correction system and the estimated distance of the ACS from the central post. All calculations are done automatically, as is the correction of shooting. The control system of the MAC “Bereg” provides for the firing of self-propelled guns with single shots and with a queue from 4 to 12 HR / min. The commander observes the combat situation on the azimuth-range indicator, or receives the necessary information from observation points, or from a corrective helicopter. Documentation of firing is carried out in automatic mode, the results of the shooting can be obtained using digital printing devices.
The central post itself is divided into 5 compartments:
- engine compartment, where the diesel-electric emergency power unit and converter are located to provide power to the BR-136;
- antenna post (compartment), where the receiving and transmitting equipment of the SLA is located;
- high-frequency compartment, which has a special shielding from microwave radiation, and where the devices operating on the microwave;
- a radio operator compartment, where information processing devices and places for a radio telegrapher and an electrician-driver were located. The place of the wireless telegraph operator is equipped with a radio station, communication devices, a fan and a heater. The place of the electrician-driver is equipped with a control panel for a diesel generator, electricity, life support system;
- camera compartment, in which the commander's places are equipped with all of the art complex, central post commander, foreman, electrician and radiometrist. The place of Commander A-222 "Coast" is equipped with navigation, alarm, communication and surveillance equipment. Nearby are folding-type tables for working with topographic maps, an emergency fire control device. The place of the commander of the central post is equipped with communications and fire control devices. Approximately also equipped with a place foremen. The places of the electrician and radiometrist are equipped with devices for tracking the detected targets, observation and communication.



Installing the central post on the ground is fixed by special jacks to ensure the horizontal plane of rotation of the antenna. Jacks have both electromechanical and manual control. In addition, in the bow above the cabin, 2 air conditioners are installed, for ventilation of equipment and for life support of the CPU.


Machine Provision MAC "Bereg"
The combat duty support vehicle consists of:
- removable power supply unit. It has two diesel-electric stations with insulated neutral, to supply power to the central post;
- fuel tanks for diesel engines with the calculation of continuous work during the week;
- 2-x and 4-x local coupe for recreation;
- 4-x local dining;
- kitchens with food for a week;
- 7.62 turret machine gun mount mm caliber on the roof;
- special equipment for signaling radiation-chemical contamination;
- navigation equipment to reach a given point;
- lockers for storage of various property of personnel.



The need for MAC A-222 "Beach"
Coastal complexes with cruise missiles will not replace coastal artillery complexes. The main reason - the dead zones in the BRK. This is the distance from a couple of kilometers to a couple of tens of kilometers of the non-affected area. In addition, cruise missiles, unlike artillery shells, are dependent on the enemy’s opposition — interference and air defense of surface ships. In addition, it makes no sense to use the CD for small boats if the cost of the CD is equal to the cost of several such vessels. Now many small countries are arming small boats, which then make up the military potential of the naval forces of a given state.

As an addition to anti-ship systems, artillery self-propelled systems should be a priority in strengthening Russian coastal defense. Now this direction is almost bare. The debate about which caliber the MAKs should have still not subsided. The main advantage of a caliber of 152 mm or more is the ability to use guided missiles and tactical nuclear munitions. The main advantage of the caliber 130 mm high rate of fire. Among other things, to increase the survivability of the coastal artillery complex, it is proposed to transfer it to tank chassis. A-222 “Shore” has bullet-proof armor and a wheeled chassis, and could have a tank chassis and armor from the impact of 127 mm of enemy naval ammunition, but this will increase the weight of the vehicles and their scope.




Key Features:
- barrel length 54 caliber;
- angles of vertical guidance from 5 to 50 degrees;
- horizontal guidance angles 120 degrees;
- travel speed up to 60 km / h;
- transfer to the combat position up to 20 minutes;
- the overall rate of fire 72 vyst / min;
- range 850 kilometers;
- the allowable distance of ACS from the CPU is no more than one kilometer;
- the weight of each unit of the complex from 43 to 44 tons;
- dimensions of ACS 13 / 3.1 / 3.9 meter;
- dimensions of the CPU 15 / 3.2 / 4.4 meter;
- dimensions MOBD 15.9 / 3.2 / 4.4 meter;
- crew of ACS / CPU / MOBD - 8 / 7 / 4 person.

Information sources:
http://xn----7sbb5ahj4aiadq2m.xn--p1ai/guide/army/ar/a222.shtml
http://armor.kiev.ua/Tanks/Modern/bereg/bereg_3.php
http://www.arms-expo.ru/049051124050055048056054.html
http://rnns.ru/14910-udarnaja-sila-artillerijjskijj-specnaz-mak-bereg.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jynqlDOXv4Y
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. grizzlir
    +4
    April 3 2012 09: 44
    Of course, such systems are very necessary. I will not go into all their pros and cons. One significant drawback of such weapons is described in the article. Weak booking.
    1. +1
      9 May 2015 01: 21
      Quote: grizzlir
      Of course, such systems are very necessary. I will not go into all their pros and cons. One significant drawback of such weapons is described in the article.Weak booking.

      Well this is not a damn tank! Do you think the conventional anti-tank gun also has a drawback - poor booking?
  2. 755962
    +5
    April 3 2012 11: 31
    Coastal systems with cruise missiles will not replace coastal artillery complexes.

    In BO, as in the ground forces, guided missiles and artillery systems do not replace, but only complement each other. All BO cruise missile systems have "dead" (unaffected) zones from several kilometers to several tens of kilometers. Missiles are dependent on active enemy interference and can be shot down by air defense systems of ships. Cruise missiles are ineffective in skerry areas and, finally, they are much more expensive than barreled artillery shells, especially when firing at low-tonnage and landing craft. For example, during the hostilities in Abkhazia, both the Georgians and the Abkhaz armed small pleasure boats and other watercraft, the cost of which is much less than the Termit or P-35 missiles.
  3. marauder
    +2
    April 3 2012 11: 32
    And if you still adapt guided high-precision shells to it.
    maybe already. they just don’t tell us.
    1. Dust
      0
      April 3 2012 18: 29
      It seems that so far managed to make shells only larger caliber ...
      1. marauder
        0
        April 3 2012 19: 42
        It seems like they are already developing or trying to develop, controlled bullets.
  4. +6
    April 3 2012 11: 42
    A real advantage is the absence of any bells and whistles ... such as satellite navigation ... Complete autonomy of use ... In short, an ideal means of dealing with an amphibious assault ... An almost instant reaction allows you to suppress fire support ships .... and then it is already guaranteed to destroy the landing vehicles .. Novel as always on top ... grizzly plus ... article plus ...
    1. Vitmir
      +1
      April 3 2012 14: 06
      Weak - bulletproof armor (penetrated by fragments of naval artillery), low mobility (patency) and vulnerability from the air sharply reduce the value of the artillery system for its practical application.
      1. +2
        April 3 2012 15: 14
        Interesting article and interesting weapons. As for the weak penetration and security - I agree. Perhaps this can be explained by the conditions of use, as it were, "in the rear". However, I think it would not be superfluous to provide control machines for at least one light ATGM and ZURS installation. And the guns themselves - with machine guns. Otherwise, one ordinary sabotage group on light armored vehicles will disassemble the whole complex for parts.
        1. tverskoi77
          +4
          April 3 2012 15: 58
          There is a machine gun support on the roof of the tower machine gun installation, but it is more designed to scare away peaceful passers-by))). You can cover the artillery complex with the help of independent armored vehicles with a separate calculation, the task of which is to block everyone on the way to the position of the Coast.
          The same KUNGs at MAZs are used including in the Strategic Missile Forces, where they are always covered by BPM, BTR ...
        2. +5
          April 3 2012 19: 28
          I hope that you don’t have to think badly about command - the coastal battery will not be put in a clean field in splendid isolation. then there will be armored personnel carriers and Tunguska. so why hang heavy guns on guns, carry a complex from a cruiser and it's so hard. I do not agree about uniqueness in the world - and the Swedes have similar self-propelled guns and the British (?).
        3. 0
          April 4 2012 02: 11
          ikrut machine guns on the roof armor-straight armored train get ..........
          but in fact yesterday and not a complex ...... no range
          1. Pessimist
            0
            April 5 2012 22: 46
            The range is sufficient for 130mm and assigned tasks. Covering the coast from the landing justifies the appointment! In addition, the high density of fire of several barrels allows you to produce something like a massive fire raid with a short duration of combat contact.
      2. Pessimist
        +1
        April 5 2012 22: 40
        Aerial vulnerability canceled by a pair of Tungusoks! And modern ships do not even carry bulletproof armor at all ...
      3. 0
        9 May 2015 01: 23
        Artillery is always hiding. Alone, alone, does not fight!
  5. vylvyn
    +2
    April 3 2012 14: 01
    a range of 20 km is still small. It is interesting when on the basis of wheeled chassis (possibly two-link) we have mobile railguns. This will be a cannon so a cannon.
    1. quaygon
      +3
      April 3 2012 15: 09
      will definitely appear when mini nuclear power plants will be transported behind them laughing
    2. marauder
      0
      April 3 2012 19: 40
      they wrote a cheap way to destroy the enemy.
      with a railgun it will no longer be cheap.

      an increase in length over 20 km also sharply increases the cost.

      for the expensive destruction of ships, anti-ship missiles exist ..
      1. vylvyn
        -1
        April 4 2012 02: 17
        And with railguns it would still be cool. By the way, the speed of the disc released from it is about 50 km per second (as the Americans said). No security system can intercept it. This is a really guaranteed option for the destruction of any (even aircraft-bearing) object. Class.
        1. krot00f
          +1
          21 August 2013 15: 23
          AAA guard, Well, dispersed the disc and then? How much will she lose? What is her mass? And why does ordinary shells intercept something? Heresy and desa.
    3. Pessimist
      0
      April 5 2012 22: 52
      Yeah, for direct fire !!! laughing I see I shoot I do not see I do not shoot! With a monstrous initial speed you can’t indulge in outboard fire, but for a range of more than 50 km, expensive corrective shells are needed again due to dispersal !!! So why then a super-mega-cool expensive railgun if the same problems are solved by RCC or OTR ??? laughing
      1. vylvyn
        0
        April 6 2012 09: 53
        And the tip is always direct. They are big-eyed, they see everything at a distance of 50 km 1 meter.
    4. 0
      9 May 2015 01: 26
      Quote: vylvyn
      It is interesting when on the basis of wheeled chassis (possibly two-link) we have mobile railguns. This will be a cannon so a cannon.

      When the energy is free and in sufficient quantity, like Tesla's, I stuck a nail into the ground and eat where you are standing.
  6. Nechai
    +1
    April 3 2012 16: 40
    Quote: grizzlir
    .Weak reservation

    So the choice of this particular chassis was due to the fact that after the TRAITful destruction of the 9K714 "Oka" operational-tactical missile system, a sufficient number of platforms remained. Although the amers and demanded them under pressure. But they were magco sent to a well-known address. The article misses one of the main purposes of the A-222 "Coast" - the fight against ekranoplanes. That is, with air targets, including low-flying targets with speeds of the order of 500 km / h. 130mm unitary artillery shot !!! And his sleeve is very interesting. The issue of gas contamination of the b / compartment has been coordinated. Eeschshch !!!
    1. FROST
      +1
      April 3 2012 22: 42
      The article missed one of the main purposes of the A-222 "Beach" -fighting ekranoplans. Ie with aerial, including low-flying targets with speeds of the order of 500 km / h.


      And a lot of ekranoplanes from probable friends?
  7. Dust
    0
    April 3 2012 18: 31
    There are doubts about the value of this complex - the firing range is clearly less than that of the alleged enemy, plus big doubts that this complex will not be suppressed from the air! Somehow it is necessary to solve the issue of cover, but then the goal will become too noticeable - here both the air defense and armored vehicles loom, it will be a little easier and easier to make stationary installations ...
    In general, the idea is good, but the performance is still rather weak in my opinion ...
    1. +1
      April 3 2012 19: 33
      How long do we have a coastline? if memory does not fail - about 60 t. km. this complex, it seems, could be transferred by aviation to the desired area, but you cannot fill up the hospitals and you cannot strengthen it so that you could withstand massive attacks, sooner or later they will still be shot down, and the "shore" will be removed after work and go to a new place
      1. -2
        April 3 2012 19: 55
        Well, about "tossing over with aviation" - it's doubtful, firstly, it's heavy and voluminous, and secondly, it's not worth the performance characteristics of this complex. In addition, if we talk about the entire sea border, then the north and east are clearly not for the "Coast" - will not work. It seems to me that Black, Baltic and (not everywhere?) Caspian. The range is not enough for sure and the caliber is better than 152 ...
        1. krot00f
          +1
          21 August 2013 15: 19
          Well, who told you about 152, this is a separate-shell loading, forget about the rate of fire, (Range is not needed there, unification is more important.
    2. Pessimist
      +3
      April 5 2012 23: 15
      Attach the same "Pantsiri" and "Tunguska" to the complex! And if you still use the folds of the terrain, then the ship's missiles are unlikely to "take the target", and the artillery on modern ships is sparse at all, against 6-8 barrels of the coast, dispersed, three or four barrels of a standard landing group will not pull! And in the sea - at a glance and completely without armor!
    3. 0
      22 July 2019 18: 07
      Let me disagree with you. If you make a complex that would be protected from air and from tanks, you’ll get a child prodigy, like the F-35, all at once and nothing. Like a shit fighter, like a bomber shit, like a stormtrooper shit. That shit in the cube.
      And our complexes are defensive, not offensive. This means that he will be on his territory, and a pair of TORs and a platoon of black berets of protection will be assigned to him. This is quite enough for normal operation.
  8. +1
    April 3 2012 18: 35
    Garny device !!! The main thing is the necessary and demanded ... smile

    Eh ... fellow I wish we had such an instrument in the anti-avalanche (anti-avalanche service) !!! ... fellow bully feel
  9. SenyaYa
    -1
    April 3 2012 19: 29
    All the same, I don’t understand who they were going to bullet into ??? Within a radius of 30 km ??? And who would allow them to bullet at such a distance ??? Navy fleet ???If we assume that there will be a revolt of monkeys, for example, in Turkey and they will build a fleet and want to capture our NOVOROSSIYSK (Or maybe Gelendzhik !! To relax there), then of course the complex is in demand! Well, we have boats to sink the Black Sea Fleet. He’s just done it!
    1. +1
      April 3 2012 19: 45
      on whom to shoot - there will always be a worthy target
    2. 0
      April 3 2012 20: 05
      Judging by the description, within a radius of 20 km ... Doubts are fair. But this is better than nothing, and there is no alternative in sight: ((There is a "Bastion" with an anti-ship missile system (if I don't confuse anything), but a little expensive and more exclusive.
    3. 0
      April 3 2012 20: 27
      Judging by the description, within a radius of 20 km ... But this is better than nothing, since there is no alternative: ((There is only Bastion with Onyx anti-ship missiles (radius 300, along the front 600), but expensive and exclusive. there was only one battery of the Black Sea Fleet.
    4. 0
      22 July 2019 18: 10
      Have you heard about the amphibious assault in case of war? Landing in Normandy ?? So, there no one would have swam to the shore, and the support ships would have crushed ...
  10. Stasi.
    +1
    April 3 2012 19: 31
    Great complex! Such complexes in the required quantity should be in service not only with the Black Sea Fleet but also with all our other fleets and flotillas. It would not be a bad idea to deliver an export version to Iran and Syria, then it is certain that the amphibious assault will become problematic.
  11. 0
    April 3 2012 20: 12
    The complex is interesting and in demand, but the "partners" also work http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CHnEuivWWw&feature=related something could be learned from them.
  12. Sergeev
    0
    April 4 2012 13: 37
    The meaning of this system without reliable air cover? And with cardboard armor.
    1. Pessimist
      +2
      April 5 2012 23: 28
      And where did you get the idea that they won't cover him from the air? "Tunguska", "Pantsiri", etc. WHAT IS ARMOR ON MODERN SHIPS? laughing Please give an example !!!
  13. enemy
    0
    April 5 2012 18: 40
    And why is it necessary to use a gun system, even if it is an A-222? I believe that the salvo system will cope with this task better, perhaps it will be Tornado-G. Even the updated hail has a firing range of 40 km 160 shells 122 mm Hail will be more effective than the first tens of 130 mm of the Shore.
    1. Pessimist
      0
      April 5 2012 23: 25
      It's all about accuracy! And in the selectivity of the goal! Something all over the world still gun mounts are a necessary attribute of the ship's armament. Well, they would have sculpted instead of AU "Grady" and "Katyusha" !!! But no, the accuracy is not the same, not at all the same! And if the first tens of 130mm "Shore" will hit the bull's-eye, then the landing operation is already trying! They will knock the flagships out of order, everything, no coordination or cover worthy of the landing. And "hail" only on the squares "bullet"!
      1. vylvyn
        +1
        April 6 2012 10: 03
        And if they don’t fall into this bullseye and knock out this triple-winged flagship, then what? Or at 130 caliber, all homing shells (with additional adjustment in the air).
  14. enemy
    0
    April 6 2012 10: 57
    The landing is usually preceded by reconnaissance, possibly UAVs and the expulsion of special forces on the coast. The shore should be on the shore, here it is kirdyk, since the fire support ships will carry it out at one time with a firing range of 40-45 km (Otto Melara) or the Kyrgyz Republic. With the existing accuracy of the upgraded Castle and Tornado with adjustable shells, the cover will be provided. Perhaps the power of the warheads is not enough, then I propose to consider the possibility of a Tornado-S.
    The coast is definitely outdated before it appears. The landing is carried out at a distance of 30 - 40 km from the coast due to the craft and amphibious infantry fighting vehicles and what, will the coast hit on each boat? If I made a mistake in the distance, correct me.
    1. +3
      April 6 2012 17: 06
      Opponent, during the exercises in Sevastopol, I saw how this system shoots. how much time does she need to turn around and curl up.
      Firstly, coastal defense is a whole range of activities undertaken by the defending side, including engineering. As a rule, the landing of reconnaissance and engineering groups is carried out with simultaneous fire defeat of the enemy until the latter approaches the RBU (Safe Removal Frontier) and is then transferred deeper. As a rule, aviation starts and landing and convoy ships are connected in order to open, destroy or suppress the main fire weapons. After clearing the aisles, the first-echelon landing grenade landing for the capture and retention of the bridgehead begins.

      And just imagine how long the air assault group will travel 40 km to its shore on its amphibian. well ... got a foothold. But we must also maintain a foothold for the landing of the main forces. But the enemy, after dispersal and regrouping, will not wait, but will inflict a retaliatory defeat or throw a counterattack into the sea. And the ships, approaching closer to the shore, the fire will lead already in depth so as not to catch their own.

      Therefore, mobile artillery will contribute to the defense.
    2. krot00f
      +1
      21 August 2013 15: 12
      Ha ha So it is made to hit each boat and hit the target from the second shell. Well, if you stick to your thought MLRS and from the coast perfectly shoot, and at a distance of 100 km. with correction.)
  15. ra1647
    +1
    April 11 2012 16: 23
    FH77 BW L52 Archer 155-mm Swedes in the beam will be
  16. Daemonir
    +2
    7 June 2012 21: 49
    maybe better (a larger caliber), but also more expensive, but is it so much better?
  17. enemy
    -1
    8 June 2012 21: 19
    vorobey
    It seems that you really can not imagine the moment when 3 to 4 BDKs land 10 to 15 high-speed landing boats + BMPs each. Do not be offended. Landing ships must be disabled 150-200 km from the landing site, the artillery complex can’t cope, only missiles, and Shilki and AK-630 are quite suitable to block the moment of landing from boats
    1. krot00f
      +1
      21 August 2013 15: 01
      Oh well, 12 rounds per minute hit from the second in the battery of 8 guns, Something I doubt that the boat needs more than one 130mm shell. Yes, even a margin of time of about 6 minutes. They’ll smash it into slivers.