KRISS KARD Pistol

The American company KRISS USA Inc. In February, 2010 applied for a patent (# 20070214699) for a new pistol using the original shutter retard system.

The body of the gun is made of plastic. The KARD barrel is fixed, as opposed to most conventional pistols. To ensure inertia, the weight is in front of the gun and is actuated by a bolt. A weight shifted down during recoil performs the same function (inertia) as a slinger in a conventional pistol. The recoil spring drives the bolt into the firing position, allowing it to send another cartridge from the magazine.

So what are the advantages of this system? The main advantage is that the recoil mechanism transmits part of the recoil energy in a downward direction (and in front of the gun), and not vice versa, as it happens in an ordinary gun. This should help keep weapon on purpose. On the other hand, the same effect can be achieved in this gun due to the relatively low location of the barrel axis and the presence of additional mass in the front fly area. Both of these advantages can be obtained in more traditional and proven designs of short-stroke pistols.

Another advantage is that, since the upper part of the pistol does not have barrel guides (skids) and is stationary, optics can easily be mounted on it, which will further increase the accuracy. Although this question is quite controversial, since most modern pistols are already more accurate than their users. A fixed barrel can provide better accuracy, and it will be easier to fasten silencers and flame arresters, as well as other devices, onto it.

The disadvantages include the following. A semi-free-bolt system may have strength problems, which may limit the use of more powerful ammunition. There are many doubts about the safety and reliability of this gun. The pivot weight must remain in the lower position until the bolt returns and slides the cartridge into the chamber. If this mechanism is stuck in the lower position, the gun will turn into a system with a straight stroke of the bolt. And this is likely to lead to rupture of the liner and the destruction of weapons.

Those who wish to get acquainted in detail with the principle of the action of weapons can do this by studying patent.

Comments

[Brother Sarych]

Not credible, in my opinion ...
And not very handsome in appearance ...

[Reddragon]

Many do not inspire confidence ...
Surely will be expensive to manufacture and sensitive to pollution.

[Kyrgyz]

Quote: Brother Sarich

It does not inspire confidence, in my opinion ... And it is not very beautiful in appearance ...

C'mon, it looks like a blaster

[755962]

Dimensional machine

[Kyrgyz]

Quote: 755962

Dimensional machine

If it sticks, you can split the head with a hilt

[Igor]

Hollywood rules:

[ward]

Well, finally ... as I imagined ... pulling it out ... and all from one view ....

[Reddragon]

Especially impress children

[coast]

and everyone starts to laugh and no one runs away

[dred]

Quote: ward

Hollywood steers

Maybe the creator watched the movie blade and did it in the likeness.

[snek]

Interesting idea. Of course, for mass weapons it is too complicated, but I do not understand the rejection of all new ideas coming from anyone other than our gunsmiths.

[PSih2097]

In principle, it’s also interesting why the main small arms got stuck on the face of the AK-47 ... that the AK-74, AK 100 and 200 series, AN, AEK ... Is it really impossible to look at world practice, why the same butt is not a telescope like on with skara or or m4, m16, and yet it is more convenient. Why does the same GP do not cling to the RIS forend, on which most useful things are hung? What is it? Wrecking or resting on our laurels?

[Bad_gr]

Quote: PSih2097

In principle, it is also interesting why the main small arms got stuck on the face of the AK-47 ... that the AK-74, AK 100 and 200 series, AN, AEK ...

And if you look at the bows, those before block bows appeared did not change for millennia.
Of course, it is necessary to invent and test new variants of pistols and machine guns, but it’s silly to sweep a licked design only because it was invented a long time ago.
The Ministry of Defense has not yet decided what kind of weapons they need, and without technical specifications, our gunsmiths do not know in which direction to work. Parroting from the West is not a solution.

[alexey garbuz]

Everything that is concocted from plastic is not worth attention until it turns into metal. Polyvinyl chloride scimitars have not inspired anyone yet.

[vylvyn]

The idea is excellent, but the plastic performance of a number of parts. It’s clear that for weight loss, but is it worth it? Most likely this toy is again intended mainly for the civilian market. Civilians love plastic.

[PSih2097]

Glock is also made of plastic, so what? this is not an indicator of the demand for the army ... especially since the idea of ​​creating this barrel is to show that the patented scheme works and most likely it will not be produced in large quantities.

[Nilfgaard]

Rather, like all 99% of mega-American super-revolutionary projects into which billions are swelling, will be sawn and closed.

[saruman]

Not at all. It is a private company and a weapon for the civilian market. Americans love to experiment, for this they are a plus. These Krisovs have created a submachine gun according to this automation scheme, which is now gaining popularity (and after the release of the last part of "Resident Evil", it will become a movie hero no worse than the "desert eagle"). Now they decided to make a pistol in pair. This is normal. Time will put everything in its place.
In general, it reminded me of the "Parabellum" scheme, just the opposite, and the shutter platoon as on Japanese pistols of the WWII era.

[SenyaYa]

Here is the trunk duck trunk !!! Terrible power is not that American fart

[saruman]

My favorite gun. Like a bullet puts -just a class. Here are just a holster-butt stupid thing, with it I never learned how to shoot, even with two-handed strings I did more accurately.

[PSih2097]

Here is an analogue from plastic - Glock 18 located in the same niche with APS:

[Pahanito]

Like Judge Dredd from the movie It remains to introduce different cartridges in one clip and voice commands.

[PSih2097]

It's interesting to watch, everyone is shouting "barrel - g ... but", but show me at least one example of the revolutionary development of the shooter over the past ten years, or at least during the Russian Federation ...

[Zynaps]

suppose that over the past 20 years, revolutionary pistols have not been created all over the world. maximum interesting, like the K-100. Among the Russian weapons, the ПЯ, СПС, ГШ-18 are clearly distinguished. their problem does not lie not in the design, but in the quality of performance, which rests on personnel, the technical process and the use of new composites.

in the Russian science and technology industry, an entire generation has been knocked out and broken generations. weapons have not yet been forgotten how to develop, but because of the junk in production capacities, because of the shortage of qualified middle-level personnel, the lower level means that the barrel of a good PY pistol has a maximum of 4 thousand shots. and even then, after 3 thousand problems with the mechanics already begin.

if I had a chance to choose my trunk, then my choice is clear - Klimovsky SPS. great hole punch.

[Sevastopol]

PP-2000 in terms of Pts is good. especially with 7H31

[bazilio]

The pistol may also be "raw", there are many weak points, but what new weapon does not have "childhood" diseases? But it seems to me that this system has a future. Of course, systems with a short stroke are simpler and more reliable, but the presented system also has its advantages. Time will tell how good this unit is))

[Sevastopol]

outwardly ugliness is certainly rare. and the dimensions of the campaign are considerable. it's easier to take pp, or a shortened machine.

[Chicot 1]

An entertaining concept, but ...
But is this game worth the candle? .. Excessive complexity of the design, increase in dimensions and mass of the weapon ... It must be assumed that the price will have more pistols of a classic design ... And how much will all this pay off by the very improved accuracy (accuracy, persistence) etc.)?..

[amph1cyon]

Is it good is bad. I can say one thing, the creation of such weapons and weapons in general leads to the emergence of a new, more advanced orgy.

[Michael HORNET]

We must wait for a workable sample, and only then draw our far-reaching conclusions
The design is quite interesting, but how will it be implemented