Ballistic missiles - on aircraft carriers

27
Ballistic missiles - on aircraft carriersDid the Celestial Empire succeed in what the USSR could not do?

According to military analysts, in the very near future, China may begin deploying land-based DF-21 ballistic missiles in an anti-ship variant capable of hitting moving naval targets. It is assumed that the use of such BR will allow the destruction of aircraft carriers, despite the presence of a variety of means of air defense and missile defense on the carrier-assault groups.

This will help the Celestial Empire to greatly strengthen the influence of its fleet at the naval theater of operations adjacent to the coast of China, to pose a serious threat (at least to this theater) by the US Navy, whose power relies primarily on “floating airfields”.

Problems remained

Incidentally, story rocket application weapons to fight the ships of the enemy originates not in the past century, but much earlier. And here our compatriots proved themselves to be innovators. It is known that in 1834 – 1838, the Russian military and inventor A. A. Schilder worked on the possibility of using combat missiles in the navy and suggested launching them from submarines. The construction of a riveted metal construction developed by Schilder was started in March and completed in May 1834 in St. Petersburg at the Aleksandrovsky Foundry. It was just intended for striking powder rockets at enemy ships at anchor, as well as at enemy squadrons passing through the straits.

The first studies and experiments with guided ballistic missiles that could be used to solve anti-ship missions were carried out in the Soviet Union in the 60 – 70s, in general, for the same reason that the Chinese are doing it today. But then our rocket R-27K was only in trial operation and was not accepted for service.

However, time has changed, but problems remained. At the same time, according to foreign experts, modern technologies make it possible to create a ballistic missile warhead with a radar guidance system or an infrared system to ensure the defeat of large moving targets such as an aircraft carrier or other large displacement warship.

Today ahead of the rest

The press, relying on information from American intelligence and Pentagon analyst assumptions, reported that China may have been developing a new class anti-ship weapon. According to the United States Naval Institute (The United States Naval Institute, a non-governmental organization. - Approx. Ed.), Information about these weapons was published in one of the Chinese specialized publications, which the US military experts consider to be a fairly reliable source. Then the translation and a more detailed description of the rocket system appeared on the naval portal Information Dissemination.


We are talking about ballistic missiles designed to destroy surface ships, primarily aircraft carriers. New weapons received the symbol Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile (ASBM). It is assumed that its development is based on the DF-21 medium-range missile (Dong Feng 21, another designation CSS-5) with a firing range of about 1500 kilometers.

The ballistic missile system (BRK) with the DF-21 “Dongfeng-21” strategic missile began to enter service with the People’s Liberation Army of China from 1991 onwards. Now the mobile compact two-stage "Dongfeng-21" replaces the "Dongfeng-3" at the missile bases "Jianshui", "Tonhua", "Lienshiwan", where they are deployed around 50 of such BRs. From here they are able to hit targets located in Northern India, on the territory of the states of Central Asia, as well as Vietnam and other countries of Southeast Asia. On the basis of the DF-21 rocket, a new medium-range DF-21X rocket is created, capable of flying 3000 kilometers, which is supposed to use GPS technology to improve the accuracy of hitting the control system. The development will take about ten years, the power of the warhead on the rocket should be 90 kilotons.

ASBM is equipped with a sophisticated guidance system with a radar homing head and target selection on the terminal part of the trajectory, which probably resembles the control system installed on the American Pershing II BR. However, as you know, at the end of the 80s, these missiles were decommissioned by the US Army and destroyed under an agreement to eliminate medium and shorter-range missiles. At the same time, the Pershing II homing system was designed to engage ground well-defended targets with an accuracy of up to 30 meters and guidance was carried out in comparison with a reference radar image of the terrain. Such accuracy forced to think about the security of their command posts.

In the proposed radar homing system of the Chinese ASBM missile, mobile naval targets such as a large warship and aircraft carrier were selected as the main targets of destruction. A similar task is no less difficult than the one that was assigned to the Pershing II BR. Therefore, the DF-21-based missile homing system is more likely to resemble a homing head (radar sighting) of cruise anti-ship missiles, especially since, as already mentioned, some of them have high supersonic speeds comparable to the speed of a medium-range ballistic missile combat unit . AGM-69 SRAM (USA) and X-15 (Russia) aeroballistic missiles are examples of medium-range air-to-surface missiles. The anti-ship variant X-15С was equipped with a radar homing head (RLGSN) on the final leg of the flight.

But back to the ASBM Chinese anti-ship ballistic missile. According to experts, the emergence of such weapons can significantly increase the security of mainland China from the sea. By countering the threat of the appearance of enemy surface units near its borders, ASBM is able to radically change the nature of hostilities in the coastal seas, as well as the development prospects and existing aircraft carrier construction programs.

No alternative?

The latter statement is controversial, since the long research and development of reliable means of combating US carrier strike assaults in the Soviet Union did not lead to significant results. And a successful alternative to the concept that the main adversary of the aircraft carrier - the aircraft carrier, apparently, has not been found so far. Moreover, great attention was paid to solving this problem in the Navy of the USSR, it was the second most important after the strategic task - delivering a nuclear strike on the coastal targets of a potential enemy and destroying his SSBNs. According to a number of experts, for our forces operating in the oceans and over its expanses, the struggle with American aircraft carriers stood in the first place. For this, in addition to submarines with cruise missiles, missile cruisers and marine missile-carrying aviation long-range aviation was involved.

According to news agencies, ASBM can fly about 1800 – 2000 kilometers. Rocket travels this distance in 12 minutes. In the middle of 2011, the Chinese newspaper China Daily published a small piece of material based on the comments of the PLA General Staff Chief Chen Bingde. The note reported that the firing range of anti-ship BR DF-21D, based on "revolutionary technologies", is 2700 kilometers.

This will allow the Chinese military to control the areas of possible confrontation between Beijing and Washington, related to disagreements over the future fate of the island nation in Taiwan.

According to analysts, thanks to the energy capabilities and dimensions of a two-stage fifteen-ton rocket, it can carry a combat charge (in non-nuclear equipment about 500 kilograms) of sufficient power to cause serious damage to large surface ships, including aircraft carriers. Some experts suggest that ASBM is capable of sinking even the largest American aircraft carrier from the first hit. By the way, the standard version of the DF-21 rocket is equipped with an 300-kiloton nuclear warhead.

There is an assumption that the Chinese anti-ship BR will be aimed at the target using satellites, radar systems, or receive information about the target from unmanned aerial vehicles. However, it is known that the Celestial Empire does not have its own full-featured satellite navigation system. CRNS “Northern Bucket” (“The Big Dipper”) BeiDou-2 on 2 December 2011 had six of the necessary 30 NCAs, and BeiDou-1 consisted of three NCAs. Hope for the American GPS in the event of a conflict with the United States (and no other country has a carrier fleet, the destruction of which requires such powerful weapons), of course, nothing. At the same time, China can take advantage of the Russian GLONASS space navigation system, which has recently been significantly increased and pushed through the international market, or its Beidou.

It is now known that China is developing a new over-the-horizon radar station that will be able to detect large ships like aircraft carriers at a distance of up to three thousand kilometers and use this data to send missiles. Similar radars were used in the USA and the USSR for detecting heavy bombers and launching intercontinental ballistic missiles. Currently, over-the-horizon radar stations of various modifications are in service with Russia, the USA, China and Australia. Later modifications of such stations were focused on solving the problem of controlling the surface situation.

Here we can recall the coastal trans-horizon surface-mounted radar (BZGR) “Sunflower-E” of the short-wave range of radio waves, which is intended for use in coastal monitoring systems of the surface and air situation within the 200-mile economic zone of the coastal state. It was created in the Russian JSC NPK NIIDAR.

New Chinese-made radar stations are believed to be used to combat the US Navy aircraft carriers in conjunction with the DF-21 anti-ship missiles.

Probably, the ASBM anti-ship ballistic missile has low visibility (Stealth technology) for the radar and has a high level of maneuverability, making the flight path unpredictable for the enemy. As believed in the US military department, tests of "aircraft carrier killers" could have been carried out back in 2005 – 2006.

It remains not entirely clear how far the anti-shipping version of the Chinese DF-21 rocket, if it actually exists, and is not just another “duck”, has progressed in the possibilities of hitting moving naval targets. It is also not known whether Chinese scientists and designers managed to create a compact homing head (GOS) with unique characteristics for a ballistic missile combat unit, as well as a control system for combat unit maneuvers by the commands of this GSN.

Already at the beginning of the 80-ies to destroy the carrier-based and large amphibious units of a potential enemy on the approaches to the shores of the European part of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries based on the 15ХХ45 medium-range missile of the Pioneer mobile complex and target designation systems of the Navy MKRTS Legenda and MRTS " Success ”The Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering (MIT) was working on the coastal reconnaissance-strike system (RUS). Work on this system was stopped in the middle of the 80-ies due to the high costs of creation and in connection with the negotiations on the elimination of medium-range missiles. And in the class of Chinese anti-ship counterpart corresponds to this development.

And what will happen next with anti-ship BR, time will tell ...
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. bagira
    +2
    12 March 2012 08: 53
    It is necessary to purchase a small batch and test them. If the declared characteristics of Chinese missiles are true, then this is a very formidable weapon and we should copy it.
    1. 0
      12 March 2012 10: 29
      Yeah, wait, they will sell it to you! fool
    2. +5
      12 March 2012 10: 32
      Copy? Leave this to the Chinese. We create wink
      1. bagira
        +1
        12 March 2012 11: 15
        I do not see anything shameful in this. Everyone is copying: both we and the Americans and the Chinese
        1. 0
          12 March 2012 19: 12
          Well ... this: we were better at creating smile
  2. 0
    12 March 2012 09: 08
    Perhaps, probably, presumably - there are too many dark spots in this matter. Almost nothing is known about the AUG detection system, the warhead guidance system, the warhead power, the probability of destruction, etc. There is no mention of the ship's air defense, which, of course, will not be idle. In short, the information on these new Chinese ICBMs looks very much like another Peking duck.
  3. Eugene
    +1
    12 March 2012 09: 15
    IMHO the most subtle moment - as if the enemy did not take it for a "normal" BR with special ammunition and did not answer with a couple of dozen Tridents and Minutemans.
    And so the maneuvering warhead, the speed is probably 5-6 Machs (I don’t remember exactly) should not please the aircraft carrier :)
  4. +5
    12 March 2012 10: 22
    Bullshit it all. I'm sorry, but if the creation of such a rocket failed in the USSR ... But they did. But it quickly became clear that the ballista couldn’t hit the moving target even with the homing it had, so we only assumed nuclear ballistases — but even they did not guarantee the aircraft carrier’s fatal defeat (the warhead would have missed 1,5-2 km from AB, and even warheads megaton class might not be enough)
    No one has yet learned how to use over-the-horizon radar to issue target designation to weapons - is China ahead of the rest, or what?
    Quote: Eugene
    IMHO the most subtle moment - as if the enemy did not take it for a "normal" BR with special ammunition and did not answer with a couple of dozen Tridents and Minutemans.

    Gold words. It was this that once stopped work on the development of high-precision non-nuclear intercontinental ballistic ammunition in the United States.
    1. 755962
      +4
      12 March 2012 11: 33
      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
      Excuse me, but if the creation of such a missile failed in the USSR.

      Why did not succeed wink The initial decree of the Council of Ministers dated April 24, 1962 on the creation of the D-5 complex also provided for the creation of a missile with a homing warhead capable of hitting moving ships. The anti-ship version of the missile was designated R-27K (GRAU index 4K18). Tests of the complex with the R-27K rocket began in December 1970. The ground test cycle at the Kapustin Yar test site included 20 launches (of which 16 were recognized as successful). Under the rocket launcher, under the pilot project 605, a diesel-electric submarine - K-102 of project 629, with 4 missile silos on board was converted. The first launch from the submarine was carried out in December 1972. And in November 1973, the tests ended in a two-rocket salvo. In total, 11 launches were completed, of which 10 were recognized as successful. During the last launch, the target vessel was hit by a direct hit of the induced block. In 1974, the rocket was put into trial operation. http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/r27/r27.shtml
      1. +4
        12 March 2012 11: 55
        Quote: 755962
        Why did not succeed

        so it still did not succeed crying
        Quote: 755962
        A total of 11 launches were performed, of which 10 was recognized as successful. During the last launch, the target ship was hit by a direct hit by the induced block.

        But further pilot operation, it did not go crying
        Because the system in general turned out to be completely unreliable and did not guarantee the defeat of the aircraft carrier. Passive GOS was very easy to fool (stupidly not including their own radar) or kerf radar destroyer air defense patrol, (then knocked out again and quickly drapan)
        And most importantly - the option of defeating a conventional, non-nuclear warhead - was not even considered in principle.
        So, heavy cruise missiles were chosen to kill aircraft carriers
        1. soldier of fortune
          0
          12 March 2012 13: 57
          You, for some reason, are trying to destroy a modern aircraft carrier by means of the 60s of the last century. Well still do not discuss the Greek fire.

          And modern BRs with separable self-guiding (more correctly ......... corrected) warheads, capable of making the same Trident accuracy, make drushlag from an aircraft carrier. laughing
          1. +1
            12 March 2012 16: 36
            Quote: soldier of fortune
            And modern BRs with separable self-guided (more correctly ......... adjustable) warheads, capable of making Trident exactly the same aircraft carrier, with accuracy

            Yeah. If he will stand still. But aircraft carriers, crap, usually do not stand still
    2. soldier of fortune
      +3
      12 March 2012 13: 53
      Are you kidding me?
      1,5-2 km for a nuclear warhead is a hit on the bullseye! At approximately this height above the surface, the nuclear warhead is undermined. There is even a dok.film about tests at sea. From the decks of the ships blows everything that can be torn off (antennas, radar, machine guns, pipes, not to mention people and planes). Shock wave speed 1km / s. And the crew (given the external surface area of ​​the ship) on their own is unlikely to cope with deactivation. If they do not leave the ship, then alive or at least healthy, they will certainly not sail anywhere.
      1. +1
        12 March 2012 16: 44
        Quote: soldier of fortune
        Are you kidding me?

        It seems that with distances I really messed up something (I wrote from memory) - but the point is that the accuracy of hitting even 0,65 MT does not guarantee the defeat of AV
  5. sazhka0
    0
    12 March 2012 10: 52
    Surely I can say if the Chinese are doing it, then in any case we already have THIS .. Just do not shout at every corner.
  6. Skiff
    0
    12 March 2012 11: 05
    Likely, if maybe la la la, blah blah blah.
    Another Chinese chatter, eternal stuffing on the links of "authoritative" publications, clumsy photos from behind bushes of "super-duper technology".
  7. +1
    12 March 2012 11: 28

    I speak differently - "the fruit of a gloomy cross-eyed genius"
  8. +1
    12 March 2012 11: 31
    That's what causes this all-strange feeling that the Chinese are bred all ... Mountains of weapons with, say, not very good parameters ... There is one thing but ... If there is no opposition to this ... I’m talking about bookmarks ... Now it’s overwhelming the amount of electronics produced in China ... An aircraft carrier, on the other hand, is a large number of all kinds of transmitters ... And if for example at the time of the attack you turn on one of them in the beacon mode ... It will probably be much easier to get there ... Yes, and all kinds of systems counteraction is not a fact that they will work ... And the task is reduced ... d flew and dropped ...
    1. Eugene
      +3
      12 March 2012 12: 42
      Stupidity.
      Any electronics put into service is tested for undocumented capabilities and embedded devices. The source codes are examined in the software (not always as it should, there are terrible examples from what I saw, with the same acronym certified by FSTEK) and the hardware is disassembled by screw. This often takes several years.
      I talked about two years ago with comrades who are engaged in the supply of mainframes for large companies (Russian Railways, MGTS) and the Ministry of Defense. They said that it takes about 7 years to fully analyze and certify. During this time, any mainframe will become obsolete. And the necessary computing power is growing. Plus, the latest modifications of mainframes by some law in the USA can not be delivered to the Russian Federation, and even more so the source codes of their OS. So think now.
  9. vostok
    0
    12 March 2012 13: 05
    I can’t wait to sink the American Aircraft Carrier !!!
    1. Eugene
      +1
      12 March 2012 13: 14
      Shkolota Detected?
    2. Jaguar
      +1
      12 March 2012 16: 02
      and why drown a person with such a strange surname and name?))
  10. German
    +3
    12 March 2012 15: 39
    I’m not special for radar and missiles, but what is written in the article seems to me to be the place to be .... China is developing very actively and no one should
    to surprise the appearance of their own developments in them! Another thing is where the legs of these developments grow from ..... ..... It was very surprising that someone was minus quite sound comments!
  11. -1
    12 March 2012 21: 47
    But it’s interesting, if you put an RLGSN on a missile of the Iskander complex, can it shoot at ships?
    1. Jaguar
      0
      12 March 2012 22: 31
      And why is this even necessary? Enough and the Bastion with the Yakhonts / Onyxes http://www.npomash.ru/activities/ru/missile2.htm, knocking them down is not easier due to the low flight altitude
  12. -1
    12 March 2012 22: 16
    information about these weapons was published in one of the Chinese specialized publications, which American military experts consider a fairly reliable source. Then a translation and a more detailed description of the missile system appeared on the naval portal Information Dissemination

    Found someone to collect information !!!! the Chinese !!!!
    The main performance characteristics of the rocket 8K84

    Developer OKB-52 (TsKBM) and branch # 1 OKB-52 GKAT
    Ch. Designer V.N.Chelomey
    Manufactured by Khrunichev Plant, Orenburg Production Association "Strela", Plant "Polet" (Omsk)
    NATO Code SS-11 Sego
    Designation according to START-1 RS-10
    Complex type missile system with light ampouled ICBM and silos type OS, second generation
    The condition was adopted on July 21, 1967, removed from service in 1988
    Rocket UR-100 (8K84), 15A10 (version of the modernization of the rocket - project), UR-100M (version of the missile for the Navy, D-8 complex)
    Shooting range, km:
    - with heavy warhead up to 5000
    - with easy warhead 1100-12000
    Shelling sector, city - + 30
    Accurate firing (KVO), m 1400 (maximum deviation - 5000)

    Head part (Option 1 - main):
    - type light monoblock thermonuclear 15F842
    - charge developer VNIITF
    - chief designer S. Kocharyants
    - charge power, MT 0,5
    - weight, kg 760-800

    Head part (Option 2):
    - type heavy monoblock thermonuclear
    - charge developer VNIITF
    - charge power, MT 1,0-1,1
    - weight, kg 1500

    Inertial control system with a gyroscopic platform based on float gyroscopes and electromechanical computing devices
    - developer of NIIAP
    - ch. designer N.A. Pilyugin
    Governing bodies:
    - I stage rotary combustion chambers of the main engines
    - II stage 4-chamber steering engine
    Separation of stages brake solid propellant rocket motors in the first stage
    - developer of solid propellant rocket plant, plant # 81
    - chief designer I.I.Kartukov
    Start type "hot" due to its own motors along guides from TPK to silo
    The number of stages of the rocket 2
    Missile length, m:
    - full with heavy warhead 16,925
    - full with easy warhead 16,97
    - on the project 16,45-16,69
    Max body diameter, m 2,0
    Starting weight, t 39,4-42,3
    Combined fuel carrier tanks
    UDMG fuel
    Fuel weight, t 10,7
    Oxidant AT
    The weight of the oxidizing agent, t 27,4
    Warranty period stored, rockets
    in TPK, years 17

    Based on:

    A.V. Karpenko, A.F. Utkin, A.D. Popov
    "Domestic Strategic Missile Systems"
    St. Petersburg: Nevsky Bastion - Gangut, 1999
  13. SAVA555.IVANOV
    -2
    13 March 2012 03: 22
    Above and below this "bad ship" can be reached, a torpedo rocket (not a "Flurry") of a special design with "stealth" technology, with an approach to the target from the depths, with a long power reserve, in general, almost like a drone. , but it should be !! A little fantasy and we will win))
  14. Igor-71
    -1
    14 March 2012 03: 52
    the technology is gorgeous .... the future is behind it, I think everyone is quietly working on it now, since no matter what Aegis can save from a ballista in 5 swoops! .... the most important problem is guidance .... but I’ll solve it ,soon