"Diamond" became a "Star"

18
What did the astronauts at the secret orbital station? What kind of space gun did our designers invent? How long did the spy satellite missions last? About this "RG" told the developers of "Almaz" - the most closed military-space project of the USSR.

Sight from orbit



Is it easy to spot enemy ships in the oceans? At the height of the Cold War, this task was very difficult. The real way out for the USSR was the space surveillance system. Already in the mid-60s, the first Soviet "Robots-spies". For example, electronic intelligence satellites (US-A, US-P), created at the Design Bureau of Vladimir Chelomey, could "sweep" the World Ocean twice a day and recognize not only the coordinates of the enemy, but also the composition of the ship group, direction These were the world's first spacecraft operating on a nuclear power plant.

At about the same time, photo-reconnaissance aircraft of the Zenit type, developed in Sergey Korolev OKB-1, were launched. However, the percentage of successful shots they had was small.

- Often the capsules with cassette tapes "on the machine" landed almost empty: on the film you could only see dense clouds. At the same time, even successful shots made in good weather did not always suit the military, as the camera had too low a resolution, ”said Vladimir Polyachenko, the former lead designer of the Almaz program at the TsKBM (now NPO Mashinostroeniya). - Therefore, it was decided to bet on people who could assess the situation on Earth and press the shutter of a powerful camera at the right time.

"Stuffing" for spy

So in the Chelomey Design Bureau a project of a secret orbital manned station "Almaz" appeared. Mass - 19 tons, length - 13 meters, diameter - 4 meters, orbit height - about 250 km. Estimated work time - up to two years. In the nose compartment, sleeping places were supposed for two or three crew members, a dining table, lounge chairs, and portholes. And the central working compartment was literally “crammed with” the most advanced “spy” technologies. Here were located the control panel for the commander and the location of the operator control survey. There were also television surveillance systems, a high-resolution long-focus camera and a semi-automatic film processing system. Plus, an optical sight, an infrared instrument, a circular periscope ...

Soviet "spybots" were the world's first spacecraft operating on a nuclear power plant.
“The periscope was set the same as in a submarine, but it was very useful in space,” cosmonaut Pavel Popovich recalled. - We, for example, saw the Skylab periscope (the first and only US orbital station. - Editor's note) at a distance of 70-80 km.

The third compartment was a docking station for a transport supply ship (TKS), which could deliver five times more payloads than the Soyuz or Progress. Moreover, thanks to its powerful thermal protection, its returnable apparatus was reusable, it was actually used three times, and it could have been used up to ten times!

But the astronauts launched a special information capsule from orbit to Earth to transfer the captured cassettes. She fired from the launch chamber and landed in a strictly specified area on the territory of the USSR. The resolution of the images thus obtained is a little more than a meter. In terms of quality, they are quite comparable with the frames provided by modern Earth remote sensing satellites.

“In the General Staff and the Main Intelligence Directorate, they were amazed at the clarity and detail in these photographs,” says Vladimir Polyachenko. - For example, Popovich and Artyukhin fixed real missile bases in America. There everything could be considered: the type of equipment, its readiness for combat use. Is that the numbers on the cars were not available.

But sometimes it was necessary to transfer information urgently. Then the astronauts right on board showed the film. On the TV image went to Earth.

Did the gun shoot?

Perhaps the most secret system of the station is Shield-1. This is a 23mm fast-firing aviation gun design Nudelman, modernized and installed in the bow of the "Diamond". What for? In the early 1970s, the United States announced the start of work on the Space Shuttle: these ships could return large-mass spacecraft from orbit to Earth. The parameters of the cargo compartment of the shuttles were in good agreement with the dimensions of the Diamond. And there were real fears: what if the Americans in their "shuttle" fly up to our station and abduct it?

Closing a project was a big mistake. If the program were implemented further, we would now have a different position in space
The system "Shield-1" is still classified, but the details of this experimental weapons became known to reporters.

“I attended the ground tests of the cannon: this is a terrible crash, a powerful automatic line-up,” says Vladimir Polyachenko. - We were afraid that the shooting in space would affect the psyche of astronauts. Because the command "fire" was given only after the crew left the station. Vibration, noise, feedback - everything is fixed within acceptable limits. And at the next station we planned to suspend the shells of the space-to-space system. Then this idea was abandoned.

The sky in "Diamonds"

50 years ago, in 1967, a commission from 70 of the most authoritative scientists, designers and officials of the Ministry of Defense approved the draft of the Almaz rocket and space complex. And already in 1971, the Proton launch vehicle launched the first Salyut-1 station in the world. Then in V.P. Mishina had to modify this project into a civilian version and remove all spyware. And in 1973, the real military "Salyut-2" (the "Almaz-1" was called for cover) was launched. But on the 13-th day of the flight there was a depressurization of the compartments, and the station collapsed from orbit.

Salyut-3 (Almaz-2) was more fortunate in 1974: he stayed in 213 for 24 days, of which astronauts worked there: commander Pavel Popovich and flight engineer Yuri Artyukhin.

- They were specially “trained” to define the goals and purposes of ground objects. For example, to see from orbit, the farm in front of you and whether the missile base - says Vladimir Polyachenko. - The astronauts had to work with the most complex photographic equipment, process the film, fit the capsule ...

For psychological relaxation, open radio channels transmitted music from the MCC to the station, broadcasts, and telephone conversations were available. One day a woman even got through to the station ... through the usual long-distance. How and why this could happen is still a mystery.

The last manned station of the Almaz project, Salyut-5, was launched in 1976. She was in orbit 412 day. The first crew, Boris Volynov and Vitaly Zholobov, worked for 49 days. The second - Victor Gorbatko and Yuri Glazkov - 16 days ...

According to experts, the closure of the project "Diamond" would have been a mistake: if the program were implemented further, we would now have a different position in space.

Heritage "Almaz"

“The Almaz station, which includes a module with a volume of 90 cubic meters with ergonomically equipped working places for a crew of three, is still relevant today,” says pilot-cosmonaut, head of the Star City Valery Tokarev. It allows for a long time to work effectively in space both in low-Earth orbits and during flights to nearby planets or asteroids.

By the way, a significant part of the International Space Station is the heritage of Almaz. It was from him that the service module of the ZS Zvezda inherited the hull design. And the Zarya module was created on the basis of a multi-purpose transport supply ship platform.

In 2018, the renewed pavilion "Cosmos" will open in Moscow at VDNH. There will be presented not only declassified materials on the program, but also the real automatic station "Almaz-1".

By the way

The world's first anti-space defense system based on maneuvering satellites equipped with homing heads was also developed under the leadership of Vladimir Chelomey. The Satellite Fighter was designed to intercept space targets and destroy them.

The first launch is in 1963. And in 1978, the complex was put into service and was on alert until 1993. “This drone could change the height and plane of the orbit. With the help of a radar head, he aimed at a spy satellite, blew up his combat units, and a bundle of fragments hit the enemy,” Vladimir Polyachenko said. “At that time, this development stopped the space arms race. All documentation there are live samples, and technology can now be restored fairly quickly. "









"Diamond" became a "Star"



18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    25 June 2017 06: 30
    The good news is that the backlogs from the times of the USSR remained for many decades! And with rapidly developing technologies, probably more! After all, the ideas themselves do not age!
    1. +12
      25 June 2017 06: 53
      Quote: Tol100v
      After all, the ideas themselves do not age!

      Of course, just now they are embodied by OTHERS, or rather, ALIENS.
      1. +1
        28 June 2017 16: 37
        or rather, ALIENS.

        More truly, it will be said ALIENS AMONG OWN.
  2. +1
    25 June 2017 10: 42
    The article, of course, may be interesting for many, but a huge number of mistakes.
  3. +8
    25 June 2017 11: 20
    for a transport supply ship (TKS), which could deliver five times more payloads than Soyuz or Progress. Moreover, its returning device, thanks to its powerful thermal protection, was reusable, was actually used three times, and could even be up to ten times!

    Ardent greetings to Mask and Falcon, and the same “Progress” (and everything else) is bad, as some people think.
  4. +11
    25 June 2017 11: 29
    Once a woman even got through to the station ... in the usual long-distance city. How and why this could happen is still a mystery.

    And after that they say that the USSR was a backward country? ... if an ordinary citizen could call a space station. lol
  5. +18
    25 June 2017 11: 41
    Closing a project was a big mistake. If the program were implemented further, we would now have a different position in space

    Our main mistake, or rather, a crime, was the closure of a great project - the USSR. Were it not for the reasonably carried out reforms, our state and position in the world would be completely different.
  6. +6
    25 June 2017 13: 35
    a significant part of the International Space Station is the legacy of Diamond. It was from him that the service module of the ISS Zvezda got the hull design. And the Zarya module was created on the basis of a multi-purpose platform of a supply supply vehicle.
    Not a very correct statement. At least because the Zvezda was created on the basis of the Salyut (Mir) long-term orbital stations (DOS), which had the indices 17K, 17KS (Zvezda had 17KSM), while the orbital manned stations (OPS) The “Diamond” index is 11F71.
    The same with the "Dawn" (index 77KM). It was a further development of the modules of the Mir orbital complex, the so-called "77th" series: "Quantum-2" (77KSD), "Crystal" (77KST), "Spectrum" (77KSO) and "Nature" (77KSI). Another thing is that these modules were created on the basis of the functional-service unit (FSB) (11F77) of the supply supply vehicle (TKS) (11F72), which was also created at Fili.
  7. +10
    25 June 2017 17: 50
    Yes ... I haven’t seen such illiteracy in a long time!
    Let's start.
    "Is it easy to detect enemy ships in the oceans? In the midst of the Cold War, this task was very difficult. The space surveillance system became a real solution for the USSR. Already in the mid-60s, the first Soviet" spy robots "were put into orbit. For example, the radio intelligence satellites (US-A, US-P) created in the Vladimir Chelomey Design Bureau could “scour” the World Ocean twice a day and recognize not only the enemy’s coordinates, but also the composition of the ship’s group, the direction of movement. the world's first nuclear powered spacecraft. "
    This complex was called "Legend". Spell - marine reconnaissance and target designation complex. As they say - "Feel the difference!". They were adopted in the early 70s, Chelomeevsky was only a carrier. The nuclear power plant (the only one in the world!) Was only at US-A. I speak not just like that - for me, the names are: Brukhansky, Osipov, Salgannik, Borisov and many others meant my immediate superiors. Before writing frank nonsense, Madame should have read a book about the ICRC "Legend", published in St. Petersburg, in the early 2000s.
    About Zenit - just a laugh. To begin with, there have been (and are) several generations. Read in the memoirs of those involved and understand how highly their work was evaluated by specialists of the GRU GSH.
    About the 23-mm cannon on board the Diamond, the "capture" by the Shuttle and other "long-distance calls to board" - the sore nonsense of Madam who has read / seen American militants.
    IN! Aren't you ashamed to publish this analytics?
    1. 0
      25 June 2017 23: 32
      Quote: AB0877
      About the 23-mm cannon on board the Diamond, the "capture" by the Shuttle and other "long-distance calls to board" - the sore nonsense of Madam who has read / seen American fighters


      Why is this Nudelman gun - nonsense?
  8. +1
    25 June 2017 19: 59
    Quote: Deadush
    Ardent greetings to Mask and Falcon, and the same “Progress” (and everything else) is bad, as some people think.

    Unfortunately, these are two different things. Land and reuse the first stage of a carrier rocket or use a reentry vehicle.

    Quote: Deadush
    And after that they say that the USSR was a backward country? ... if an ordinary citizen could call a space station

    This is nonsense, fairy tales of the "Vienna Forest". How do you imagine all this. Took a certain Madame and called the station by phone?
    The maximum that she could do, knowing the indices and numbers, was to get through to the MCC. Even the families of flying astronauts came to the MCC for communication. Just a telephone headset for them was replaced with a telephone. And the ground-to-board connection initially had no access to the telephone network. Of course, such a connection could be specially commuted to the top leaders. But only on purpose
  9. +3
    25 June 2017 20: 14
    Quote: AB0877
    About Zenit - just a laugh. To begin with, there have been (and are) several generations.

    Not only were these products launched not in the mid-60s, as Madame writes. and the first was launched on December 11, 1961. And US-A type satellites began flying from 3.10.1970/367/60 (Cosmos-XNUMX), and not from the mid-XNUMXs
    I already wrote about the phone call above. As for the gun - what to do. Sometimes we have many things that went beyond the reasonable. It is interesting how a shuttle could put a 20-ton station inside and sit with it when the maximum that it could carry on landing was a load of 14 tons.
    The system was developed, but most likely for its own reassurance. First, "Shield-1" with a Nudelman gun, and then "Shield-2" with two missiles again of the same Nudelman

    Quote: Cannonball
    Not a very correct statement. At least because the Zvezda was created on the basis of the Salyut (Mir) long-term orbital stations (DOS), which had the indices 17K, 17KS (Zvezda had 17KSM), while the orbital manned stations (OPS) The “Diamond” index is 11F71.
    The same with the "Dawn" (index 77KM). It was a further development of the modules of the Mir orbital complex, the so-called "77th" series: "Quantum-2" (77KSD), "Crystal" (77KST), "Spectrum" (77KSO) and "Nature" (77KSI). Another thing is that these modules were created on the basis of the functional-service unit (FSB) (11F77) of the supply supply vehicle (TKS) (11F72), which was also created at Fili.

    The author has everything mixed in one pile. But it was not only that there were three types of stations, but Salutes were also divided into generations.
    If the author would like to write the history of the USSR orbital stations, then it was necessary to talk about unrealized projects, such as 11F711, 11F? 30 orbital station, and not to mention only long-term 11F715 orbital stations, they are also Salyut stations, they are 17K complexes and 27KS, mention not only the 11F71 Almaz orbital manned stations. but also complexes 11F668 - automatic stations "Almaz"
    And the history of the TCS and modules of the 37 and 77 series would not hurt to mention
  10. 0
    26 June 2017 14: 28
    Quote: Old26
    Sometimes we have many things that went beyond the reasonable. It is interesting how the shuttle could put a 20-ton station inside and sit with it when the maximum that it could carry on landing was a load of 14 tons.

    And it's not about “stealing” a station from orbit using a shuttle (although such an application was supposed for the shuttles by their creators, only for proportionate vehicles). It is clear that it will not fit. A cannon is a defense against "inspections" and many other unfriendly actions of a potential adversary related to his direct access to the spacecraft.
  11. 0
    26 June 2017 17: 14
    Quote: USSRengineer
    And it's not about “stealing” a station from orbit using a shuttle (although such an application was supposed for the shuttles by their creators, only for proportionate vehicles). It is clear that it will not fit. A cannon is a defense against "inspections" and many other unfriendly actions of a potential adversary related to his direct access to the spacecraft.

    Alas, it’s not so much for protection from inspection (try to inspect the object in those years when the series of expeditions to it was continuous), namely from capture. Boarding if you want. The crew was supposed to be protected by this defense system "Shield-1". Although, in principle, this is not so significant. Capture or inspection. The gun, which was installed motionless and could only be guided by turning the entire station - sorry, but not entirely adequate
    And the shuttle in our press was presented precisely as a possible kidnapper of our stations
    Moreover, our newspapers didn’t at all think about the fact that having “captured” such a shuttle station, they simply could not have sat down

    Quote: sergo1914
    Why is this Nudelman gun - nonsense?

    Not the gun itself. And the defense system with its use
  12. 0
    27 June 2017 10: 34
    Quote: Old26
    Moreover, our newspapers didn’t at all think about the fact that having “captured” such a shuttle station, they simply could not have sat down

    Yes, the station would not fit in the cargo hold ... with solar panels. And without them, it would fit perfectly, but the descent to Earth would not have been possible. The size of the Shuttle cargo compartment is 18,3x4,6 m., And the size of the Salyut-3 station: length is 11,61 and the maximum diameter (according to EVTI) is 4,15 m. One "BUT": the mass of Salyut-3 is 18,9 tons, and the maximum load brought down from the orbit by the shuttle is less: not less than 14,5 tons. By and large, the suspicion of the intention to abduct the "Diamonds" was based solely on the dimensions of the cargo compartment and the return useful load, openly announced by the shuttle developers, close to the dimensions and weight of the “Diamonds”. Nobody knew that the American intelligence satellite, which the shuttle was planning to put into orbit, had a similar size.
    And the gun - it was just a technical solution that could be implemented in the shortest possible time. What they could quickly come up with and quickly do, they did. Acted on the situation.
  13. +1
    27 June 2017 15: 02
    Quote: USSRengineer
    Yes, the station would not fit in the cargo hold ... with solar panels. And without them, it would fit perfectly, but the descent to Earth would not have been possible. The size of the Shuttle cargo compartment is 18,3x4,6 m., And the size of the Salyut-3 station: length is 11,61 and the maximum diameter (according to EVTI) is 4,15 m. One "BUT": the mass of Salyut-3 is 18,9 tons, and the maximum load brought from the orbit by the shuttle is less: not less than 14,5 tons.

    And I'm talking about. By chopping off the wings, that is, solar panels could be placed in the shuttle arrester. But only that. When landing, the shuttle would simply crash ....

    Quote: USSRengineer
    By and large, the suspicion of the intention to abduct the Diamonds was based solely on the dimensions of the cargo compartment and the return payload, openly announced by the shuttle developers, close to the dimensions and weight of the Diamonds. Nobody knew that the American intelligence satellite, which the shuttle was planning to put into orbit, had a similar size ..

    That's it. The idea of ​​the abduction of the station spun for propaganda purposes. For most people, the presence of "lacrosse" and "Chihuahols" and about the same dimensions were simply unknown

    Quote: USSRengineer
    And the gun - it was just a technical solution that could be implemented in the shortest possible time. What they could quickly come up with and quickly do, they did. Acted on the situation.

    So it was. But the gun itself was fixed on the surface of the station "tightly." And to aim it at the target it would be necessary to "rotate" the entire station
  14. 0
    5 November 2017 14: 31
    "Diamond"gave the USSR priority in creating DOS. Salute-1 was made in the corps" "Diamond", forcibly taking the last from Chelomei.

    The spy camera lens on the Diamond is only slightly smaller than the Hubble’s boiled-off camera. laughing

    TKS, with a reusable returning apparatus and the widest possibility of orbital maneuvering, was ruined exclusively in vain. This is one of the most voluntaristic mistakes of the USSR. TKS is much more perfect "Union"in all respects, and could fly now instead"Union"on the ISS. As a rescue ship, he could provide emergency evacuation of the crew from the ISS for 6+ people.

    TKS is better than the designed Dragon (it is also reusable !!!) and Starliner, and maybe Orion.

    The USSR has always been ahead of the rest.
    1. 0
      20 November 2017 15: 31
      Recover, be!
      Quote: Gormengast
      TKS, with a reusable returning apparatus and the widest possibility of orbital maneuvering, was ruined exclusively in vain. This is one of the most voluntaristic mistakes of the USSR. TCS is much more perfect than Soyuz in all respects, and could fly now instead of Soyuz to the ISS. As a rescue ship, he could provide emergency evacuation of the crew from the ISS for 6+ people.

      Well, not always, more precisely, not everywhere!
      Quote: Gormengast
      The USSR has always been ahead of the rest.

      "But for the State it was not a shame!"