Test of modern small arms

28
Test weapons on the range - this is exactly the milestone that must be overcome for the adoption of a particular weapon. The results of these tests, despite their recommendatory character, still affect the further use of the whole structure.



In general, the study of small arms begins with measurements of the hull and chamber, since each type of weapon has its own caliber, which must be adhered to. The length of the barrel channel and the presence of the necessary gaps between the sleeve and the gate are also measured. If all standards are met, the weapon is sent to fire.

Tests begin, as a rule, with determining the level of accuracy of shooting and dimensional stability. Possible changes in the internal diameter of the barrel, efforts to release the bolt are taken into account. For this, a large number of shots are made from the tested weapon. Thus, accuracy of fire is checked.

In order to determine the possibility of using weapons in extreme conditions, they freeze them, and then they shoot them. This makes it possible to determine how reliable a particular weapon is, and whether there will be any misfires, how the cartridge will be fed, and how it will be sent in future use of the weapon. The same tests are carried out with water - whether the weapon will burst, with dusting with sand and water.

In the course of all tests conducted and test for strength. Weapons are thrown onto a concrete surface from a height of 1 and 1,5 meters with a constantly cocked trigger. This way it is checked whether the shutter will accidentally open and whether the weapon will shoot if dropped.

Approximately in this way, not so long ago, at the test site in the Moscow region, significant tests of modern small arms — the Kalashnikov AK-74 national machine gun and the American M-4 assault rifle — were conducted. The main task of the tester was to accurately hit the target, regardless of which sample he was testing. The first stage involved shooting at an imitation sheet of a bulletproof vest. The caliber of both weapons is about the same - 5,5 millimeters. The results obtained are diametrically opposed. Holes left by the domestic machine, did not even have to celebrate on the stand. The second stage involved shooting at an acoustic target in order to determine the accuracy of shooting. M-4 showed great accuracy with single shots. When shots burst the best was AK-74. Thus, according to the results of the two stages, the weapon is approximately equal.

In addition to comparing this weapon in accuracy, killing power and accuracy, there is another important quality - the absence of misfires. Therefore, conditions were created for extreme shooting. Both samples were frozen to –50 degrees, after which these samples were thawed and frozen for a second time. As a result of tests in extreme subzero temperatures, it was possible to establish that the AK-74 is able to shoot without misfire, while the M-4, after a couple of shots, becomes unusable.

The Kalashnikov assault rifle was adopted by the Soviet troops after the ground tests in the 1949 year. In spite of the fact that the automatic machine demanded a revision to improve the accuracy of fire, the commission nevertheless recommended it for launching into mass production.

History The creation of the Kalashnikov assault rifle began back in 1942, when Soviet troops captured the first samples of German automatic rifles MKb.42 (H) under an 7,92-mm cartridge. In the 1943 year, as a result of the study of this machine, as well as the American M-1 carbine, the Soviet command decided that it was necessary to immediately develop its own weapon system for intermediate cartridges that would allow ground forces to conduct effective combat at a distance of up to 400 meters. The development of a new type of weapon began with the development of a directly new cartridge, and in the same 1943 year, all organizations that were engaged in the development of weapons received drawings and characteristics of a new cartridge that was developed by designers Semin and Elizarov. The cartridge was a bottle sleeve, the length of which was 4 centimeters and was equipped with a bullet caliber 7,62 millimeter, weighing 8 gr. Under the new cartridge, it was decided to develop several types of weapons - an automatic rifle, a manual reload carbine and a self-loading carbine. In 1944, the automatic machine Sudaeva АС-44 was selected for testing. After it was finalized, it was decided to manufacture a small series for testing conducted in the 1945 year. Tests were carried out both by troops stationed on German territory and by subunits on the territory of the USSR. Despite the fact that the results were very successful, the troops demanded a reduction in the mass of weapons. After that, another test phase was conducted in the 1946 year.

At this time, Sergeant Kalashnikov appears, who, after being injured in 1942, during the treatment, managed to develop a submachine gun having an original design. He was sent for further service in NIPSMVO near Moscow. There, two years later, he presented another development - a self-loading carbine, very similar to the American M1Garand rifle. When the competition for the creation of an automaton was announced, Kalashnikov also took part in it. In 1946, the sample, along with several others, was approved for prototyping. As a result, an automaton, known as AK-46, appeared. As a result of the tests, this sample was declared unfit for the continuation of the tests. However, the author managed to achieve a review of the decision and approval for its further refinement.

He decided to radically redesign his weapon. As a result, the new machine was ready for the new test phase, which had practically nothing to do with the AK-46, but it was very much like the Bulkin machine. In general, all the main elements of the design were borrowed from other types of weapons: the firing mechanism from the Czech Holek rifle, the placement of the bolt group inside the receiver - from the Soudaev machine gun, the safety lever - from the Remington rifle.

It should be noted that such copying of design solutions was not only not prohibited, but was also strongly supported, since all intellectual property, however, like everything else, was considered in the Union to be common, owned by the people. In 1947, new tests were carried out, as a result of which the Kalashnikov assault rifle was recognized as the best among those presented and was sent to mass production.

A Kalashnikov assault rifle is an automatic weapon with vapor-automatic, equipped with magazine-powered and barrel-cooled air. The trigger mechanism is of the hammer type, which allows firing in bursts as well as single fire. The choice of shooting mode is a special lever. The stem part is equipped with a thread on which you can install a compensator to increase the accuracy of shooting. The thread can also install a silencer.

The American M-4 carbine was created based on the M-16 automatic rifle. This carbine has a high accuracy of fire due to the high speed of ammunition, high-quality cutting and low recoil. But at the same time, due to the more complex design of the gas tube and the automatic frame, it is very sensitive to the ingress of dirt.

It is worth noting that such a design with a shutter, which walked in a frame with a minimum gap, will very often be exposed to pollution from the release of powder gases, therefore the sleeve will not be thrown away. It can only be removed with a ramrod on the barrel side. In this situation, inevitable significant delays in the conduct of shooting. And since the misalignment of cartridges happened every few shops, the effectiveness of the weapon, respectively, decreased.

During the conduct of hostilities in Afghanistan, there was a large amount of evidence from American soldiers that M-4 was unreliable in battle, which resulted in large losses.

Therefore, the US government decided to abandon procurement on a non-competitive basis of this type of weapon. The most compelling argument for refusal is the results of tests of several types of weapons, conducted last year. In terms of reliability, the M-4 ranked last after the automatic rifles HK416, XM8 and SCAR.

Despite the results, the military department stated that M-4 had proven itself well during the fighting, and the number of misfires was insignificant. But at the same time, the Pentagon recognizes the need to improve this carbine in terms of strengthening the spring mechanism in order to eliminate misfires. Trials of the upgraded M-4 are scheduled for the summer of 2012. It should be noted that some of the US military units in the 2004 year replaced the M-4 carbine with an HK416 automatic rifle and a modified SCAR.

The M-4 automatic carbine was put into service in the 1994 year, and over the past years it has practically not been modernized.

Each of these two types of weapons has both its advantages and a number of disadvantages. AK-74 is reliable, unpretentious in operation, easy to use, has a low cost. At the same time, it has not entirely successful ergonomics.

Both types are considered obsolete, therefore it is planned to replace them with newer types. But this is in the future, and even now hardly anyone can guarantee that this new weapon will be more efficient than the AK-74 and M-4.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    22 February 2012 09: 03
    This is the result of all the disputes.
  2. +13
    22 February 2012 09: 06
    Because Russia makes the best machines for REAL war, which is still the stage of drawings and tests of the product must go through exorbitant loads.
    The only thing is that our plants need new equipment, then we will do even better.
    + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
    With regards to this part - "In terms of reliability, the M-4 ranked last after the HK416, XM8 and SCAR automatic rifles."
    So nothing surprising - America is not pulling against the Germans and the Belgians!
  3. Dimitrxnumx
    +2
    22 February 2012 09: 24
    During the battle it is important that the weapon is reliable and does not fail, you don’t even think about ergonomics and beauty.
  4. +3
    22 February 2012 09: 42
    Thanks to the professionals. That's the result of all the disputes. The rest is from the evil one and from the corruption of officials.
  5. +2
    22 February 2012 10: 55
    which they do not compare with G36 for example ... with a brand or something more modern ........
  6. 755962
    +2
    22 February 2012 13: 05
    About the reliability of the AK-74 legends make up. Made in USSR!
  7. nok01
    +1
    22 February 2012 13: 54
    I have nothing against the AK-74, it will still serve and serve, but in modern combat it is already necessary to create radically new weapons for the next 60 years! Ak in warehouses up to *** ah, enough for three wars ....
    1. +1
      22 February 2012 20: 16
      weapons as well as money, there isn’t much !!! wink
  8. dred
    -6
    22 February 2012 14: 05
    Well, they created an ak-12 between m4 and ak-74.
  9. +9
    22 February 2012 14: 28
    Kalash is very reliable and a good car. Himself more than once in the light laid all the targets and single and bursts. And without much preparation. But with PM it didn’t work out that way. There you need skills and good practice. Although we had guys that they beat out a PM 48 th out of 50 with a hangover. I didn’t succeed :)) As a mass machine, Kalash is beyond competition. Although, I completely agree that for the special forces something more glamorous is needed. IMHO.
    1. Hans grohman
      +2
      22 February 2012 15: 14
      Quote: ikrut
      Kalash is very reliable and a good car. Himself more than once in the light laid all the targets and single and bursts. And without much preparation.

      When I was urgent, when firing at the firing range, I had the opportunity to lay down two targets in one burst - a growth target at 80m and a machine gun crew at 350m. Automatic - AKS-74.

      Quote: ikrut
      But with PM it didn’t work out that way. There you need skills and good practice.

      Well, skills are needed everywhere, just like practice is never superfluous. I managed to make friends with PM, but I don’t have a TT-shnik
    2. Altergo
      0
      29 March 2012 09: 53
      So special forces often run with Shafts and Vintorez.
  10. Anar) (East
    0
    22 February 2012 17: 07
    Interesting ... Why, to all not compare with other samples of foreign production? request
    1. 0
      22 February 2012 17: 31
      I think it should be compared with samples from "one niche". Kalash is a machine gun for MASS weapons of the army. Well, what other most popular machine would you suggest for comparison? That would be just as reliable, unpretentious, convenient, practical, technologically advanced in production for mass production and use ..
      1. Anar) (East
        +1
        22 February 2012 21: 58
        I have nothing against the Kalashnikov assault rifle, for example, it could be compared with G36, FAMAS, QBZ-95, Galil, SIG SG 550, Steyr AUG, L85A2. I think there are many examples of small arms. Compare and see if something is "missed", or something is missing.
  11. korbdegree
    -1
    22 February 2012 19: 42
    And the funniest thing. There is a dude with the nickname Lys on the yellow confe, he’s just from this office and generally an insider of the domestic defense industry, or rather its press release. The moment when the M4 wedged, waited a very long time. According to him, 12 stores were shot, then they still caught a wedge and mounted it as if it had happened right away. And yes, the second rifle, which seems to be falling in water, is the M16A1 made in 1965. Comparing it with modern weapons is stupid.
    And for dessert:
    http://vk.com/video121370594_161563270

    http://vk.com/video121370594_159003487

    http://vk.com/video121370594_159907925

    http://vk.com/video121370594_159777980

    http://vk.com/video121370594_159003460

    Stop believing propaganda, kids.
    1. Anar) (East
      -2
      22 February 2012 22: 05
      Support. drinks
    2. +10
      22 February 2012 22: 57
      Unfortunately I can not give a link. watched on satellite TV. The comparison was made by the Americans with the participation of NATO friends. First, in greenhouse conditions. Checked - the result is the same. We decided to complicate, the result is the same. Complicated yet, the result is the same. Complicated - the American won with a minimal advantage (though there could be a human factor), but God bless him - I emphasize minimally and insignificantly. But then they decided to make the test more interesting - they put both samples in the same puddle. Kalash all parallel and perpendicular. "Amer" gave a turn and "truncated". After that, it was decided to stop the test and give the victory ... to the creation of the most democratic gunsmiths on the basis of the 3rd greenhouse test. Why didn't you cut out the excess? This is not a question. But it is not at all interesting what I described here. The most interesting part of the report was in the background. And there was a former British Special Forces soldier who passed Iraq. So he kept repeating like a broken record: "Kalashnikov is better, Kalashnikov is the best because he works." He accompanied all this with expressive gestures as if he were not British but Italian (like jumping for joy after a test with a puddle or shaking his head in annoyance when the verdict was announced).

      Last week, a news report from Afghanistan: in the frame of a rash of American Marines, they stand with M-4 in their hands - all honor is on honor; there’s only one fire, it’s always with its back to the lens; gives a long line and changes position. At that moment for a moment (I myself noticed this purely by accident) a familiar trunk and forearm flashed painfully from behind his shoulder.

      All of us here were holding Kalashnikovs in our hands not in the sense of "looking at".
      Quote: korbdegree
      Stop believing propaganda, kids.

      Not propaganda. And to your eyes, healthy logic and PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. That's it, son.
    3. Vilis
      0
      26 February 2012 19: 42
      By the way, yes! I noticed too !!! laughing
    4. slas
      0
      8 March 2012 22: 17
      Quote: korbdegree
      And for dessert:
      http://vk.com/video121370594_161563270

      http://vk.com/video121370594_159003487

      http://vk.com/video121370594_159907925

      http://vk.com/video121370594_159777980

      http://vk.com/video121370594_159003460

      Stop believing propaganda, kids.

      looked and I advise you to be more critical of what you offer * sweet * I will not explain Who wants to look and understand recourse And in childhood you are my friend, sweet tooth laughing
  12. +2
    22 February 2012 22: 38
    Who among those present has operational experience with the M-4 / M-16? don’t believe this video, everything is not so bad with an American rifle, AK is certainly not surpassed and not killed in terms of reliability, but when shooting in bursts, for example, I have M-4 accuracy at times better, I’m not talking about single players ... By the way, I’m talking about the above noticed but I repeat, at least once someone heard that they arranged a comparison of AK for example with G-36, FN F2000, FN SCAR, Tavor, AUG Steyr, MAGPUL Masada / Bushmaster ACR ... NO? Why? Because questions will arise, but is it time to create and arm the army with something new ...
    1. 0
      22 February 2012 23: 51
      It has long been calculated that the AK-74 to M-16 has more dispersion at 20-25% (dis. 200m), but this does not interfere with putting all the bullets in the head and is sure to hit at distances up to 400m (you can continue). The sniper version (extended by 70mm) is equal in accuracy to SVD (I don’t know the details).
      Some of AKMs have a good shot at 200-400. For me, this is a mystery (experience on the floor of a horn)

      M16 was so indestructible that it was delivered to Vietnam without a clean kit. Only then they decided that it was unprofitable and made the rifle killable, but now it had to be cleaned (sarcasm laughing )

      If you so want, you can search on the sites about reliability and accuracy (search for the tag "MOA"). I can only say that many armies willingly run with AK, not only because of the low price wink
      1. 0
        25 February 2012 00: 37
        I don't need to look for such information on websites, I have personal Saiga and M-4, every day I can compare them ... bully
        1. novic
          0
          26 February 2012 22: 21
          Saiga is a civilian weapon and cannot be compared with a military one.
    2. Vilis
      0
      26 February 2012 19: 37
      you write that YOU WITH M-4 QUALITY ARE MUCH BETTER, but it depends on the person! You may be better and someone worse !!! request
  13. +1
    23 February 2012 00: 13
    Matched to the pitch of the 5,56x45 rifling from AK-105 packaged in a modern body kit and a good DTK, it flies no worse than from the M-4 / AR-15, and therefore it is correct to compare precisely these samples. Everything is in the hands of the shooter, from his experience of shooting from a specific sample, but the retention skills when shooting from these types of weapons vary significantly.
  14. Vilis
    0
    23 February 2012 08: 54
    Of course, I'm pretty good at this, but judge for yourself! Almost half of the world is buying AK not depending on whether it is-47, then it is-74, etc. Not that they are buying, it is just that some countries have a Kalash in service. I will give the most flawed example of why all the terrorists prefer AK AND NOT TIGHTEN M. why7 yes because Kalash is BETTER !!!! bully
  15. +1
    24 February 2012 22: 12
    Even if the United States launches its M-16 half the price, AK will have priority, with AK47 over priority. There is no more powerful device in its niche.