RT-15: the history of the creation of the first self-propelled ballistic missile of the USSR (part 1)

17
The mobile combat missile system 15P696 developed in Leningrad became the forerunner of the legendary “Pioneer”

RT-15: the history of the creation of the first self-propelled ballistic missile of the USSR (part 1)

The first prototype self-propelled launcher complex 15P696 on field trials. Photos from http://www.globalsecurity.org



"Land submarines" - what can be hidden behind this strange, at first glance, term? Academician Boris Chertok, one of those people who created the domestic rocket industry, called this phrase mobile earth rocket systems - unique weapons, which the main opponent of the USSR in the “cold war” could not copy.

Moreover, the term coined by academician Chertok hides much more than just an analogy with submarine rocket carriers. The United States, having failed after the creation in the Soviet Union of such missiles as the UR-100 and P-36 family and its successor, to restore parity in the land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, relied on nuclear submarines. It is clear that the submarine, whose location in the ocean is very difficult to establish, is almost an ideal platform for storing and launching ballistic missiles. Moreover, they can be made not too long-range - it is enough to sail to the shores of a potential enemy, and from there even a medium-range missile will finish almost to any place.

Having failed to create an equally powerful nuclear missile fleet, the Soviet Union found its answer to the American approach - mobile missile systems. It is not by chance that the Molodets railway combat missile system frightened overseas strategists so much that they insisted on its categorical disarmament. But no less a problem for reconnaissance and, accordingly, targeting of ballistic missiles are mobile complexes on a car chassis. Go find such a special car in the vast expanses of Russia, even if it is twice the size of a regular truck! And satellite systems can not always help with this ...


Self-propelled launcher of the mobile missile system 15P696 with a rocket RT-15 in combat position. Photos from http://militaryrussia.ru

But the creation of mobile BRK strategic purpose would be impossible without the appearance of solid-propellant rockets. It is they, who are lighter and more reliable in operation, have allowed the development and launching of land-based submarines of the Russian Strategic Missile Forces into mass production. And one of the first experiments in this direction was the mobile 15P696 ground-based missile system with the RT-15 rocket - the first (along with the “mother” RT-2) medium-range commercial solid-propellant in the USSR.

Liquid to the detriment of solid

Despite the fact that before the beginning of the Second World War and during it, the priority in the development, and most importantly - in the practical use of rockets on solid fuel engines belonged to the Soviet Union, after the war he lost it. It happened for a number of reasons, but the main one was that the gunpowder on which the shells of the legendary Katyushas were flying was completely unsuitable for large rockets. They ideally dispersed the missiles, if their active leg of the flight took seconds. But when it came to heavy rockets, in which the active site takes dozens, or even hundreds of seconds, domestic solid-propellant rocket engines (RDTT) were not up to par. Moreover, in comparison with liquid rocket engines, they had an insufficient specific impulse of thrust at that time.


Solid fuel rocket RT-15 in a shipping container at the plant "Arsenal". Photos from http://www.russianarms.ru

All this led to the fact that in the Soviet Union, which got into the hands, even if heavily thinned out by the Allies, still very informative documents and samples relating to German rocket technology, relied on liquid-propellant engines. It was on them that the first Soviet ballistic and operational-tactical missiles with nuclear warheads took off. At the same engines, at first, American intercontinental ballistic missiles also flew. But - only at first. Here is how Boris Chertok talks about this in his book of memoirs “Missiles and People”:

“Since the times of the classical works of the pioneers of rocket technology, it was considered unshakable that the solid fuel — types of gunpowder — is used in those cases“ when simple, cheap, short-term propulsion is required. ” For long-range missiles, only liquid fuel should be used. This lasted until the beginning of the 1950-ies, while the jet propulsion laboratory of the California Institute of Technology has not developed a mixed solid rocket fuel. It was not powder at all. The only thing common with the powders was that the fuel did not require an external oxidizer - it was contained in the composition of the fuel itself.

Mixed solid fuel, invented in the United States, was far superior in energy performance to all of our gunpowder grades used in rocket artillery. The powerful American chemical industry, with the help of rocket engineers, evaluated the prospects of discovery and developed a technology for large-scale production.

Mixed solid rocket fuel is a mechanical mixture of solid fine particles of oxidizer, metal powder or its hydride, evenly distributed in the organic polymer, and contains up to 10 – 12 components. Oxygen-rich salts of nitric (nitrates) and perchloric (perchlorate) acids and organic nitro compounds are used as oxidizing agents.

The main fuel is metal in the form of highly dispersed powders. The cheapest and most common fuel is aluminum powder. Mixed fuels, even with well-established technology, remain significantly more expensive compared to the best in energy performance liquid components.

When pouring into the body of the rocket, an internal combustion channel is formed. The engine housing is additionally protected from heat exposure by a layer of fuel. It became possible to create solid propellant rocket motors with a working time of tens and hundreds of seconds.

A new technology of equipment, greater safety, the ability of mixed fuels for stable combustion made it possible to produce large charges and thus create a high value of the mass perfection coefficient, despite the fact that the specific impulse of solid propellant rods is even lower than that of the best composite recipes. - liquid rocket engines. However, constructive simplicity: the absence of a turbopump assembly, complex fittings, pipelines — with a high density of solid fuel makes it possible to create a rocket with a higher Tsiolkovsky number. ”


The first American ICBM solid fuel "Minuteman" in the museum. Photos from http://historicspacecraft.com

So the Soviet Union lost priority, first in the creation of intercontinental ballistic missiles, and then began to give way to strategic parity. After all, solid-fuel missiles can be produced much faster and cheaper than liquid ones, and the safety and reliability of solid-propellant solid propellant rocket engines allow you to keep them on alert constantly, with the highest degree of readiness - within one minute! These are the characteristics of the first American MBR on solid fuel "Minuteman", which began to enter the troops at the end of 1961. And this missile required an adequate response - which still had to be found ...

Three impulses for Sergey Korolev

Looking ahead, I must say that the real answer to the “Minutemen” was the liquid “weaving” - the UR-100 rocket, developed in Vladimir Chelomey's OKB-52 (detailed on stories the creation and adoption of this missile can be found here). But at the same time as the "weave", the first solid-fuel Soviet missiles were developed and tested - and also as a response to the "Minuteman". And a man who for a long time was accused of being too strongly addicted to liquid engines, Sergei Korolyov, took up their creation. Boris Chertok writes about it this way:

“Korolev received not one, but three impulses at once, forcing him to be the first of our chief designers and rocket strategists to rethink and change the choice in which strategic missile weapons were oriented exclusively towards liquid-propellant rockets.
<...>

The first impetus for the start of work in the OKB-1 over solid-fuel missiles was the abundant information about the Americans’s intention to create a new type of intercontinental three-stage rocket at the beginning of 1958. I don’t remember now when we received the first information about “Minutemen”, but, having appeared for some business in Mishin’s office, I witnessed a conversation about the reliability of this information. Some of the designers reported to him about the correspondence of the information received to our then ideas about the capabilities of solid-propellant rockets. The general opinion was unanimous: to create a rocket with a launch mass of just 30 tons and a mass of the 0,5 head part to the tonnes at a distance of 10 000 km in our time is impossible. On that temporarily and calmed down. But not for long".

The second impetus for the start of work on solid-fuel missiles, Boris Chertok calls the return to the rocket industry of "the old ally of GIRD, RNII and SRI-88" Yury Pobedonostsev. And the third is the appearance in Sergey Korolev of OKB-1 of another old rocket man, Igor Sadovsky, who once worked in the “rocket” scientific research institute-88. Boris Chertok recalls:

“Sadovsky encouraged volunteers and gathered a small“ illegal ”group to prepare proposals for ballistic solid fuel missiles (BRTTs). The main core is three young specialists: Verbin, Sungurov and Titov.

“The guys are still green, but very intelligent,” said Sadovsky. - I distributed three main tasks between them: internal ballistics, external ballistics and construction. The previous hardware connections helped me, managed to agree with Boris Petrovich Zhukov, the head of the Scientific Research Institute-125 (this is our main institute for rocket and special powders), on a joint theoretical study. And at NII-125, our old general head Pobedonostsev is in charge of the laboratory, where they are already working not only on paper, but are also experimenting to create gunpowder drafts of new composition and large sizes. Sadovsky spoke about his "underground" activities to the Queen.
Korolev immediately agreed with Zhukov and Pobedonostsev about “leaving the underground,” and the development of a project for a medium-range solid-fuel rocket began. ”


The family of Soviet solid-state ballistic missiles. Photos from http://www.globalsecurity.org

Sergey Korolev managed to attract people to these works who, it would seem, could hardly find themselves in the rocket theme - employees of the former artillery design bureau of General Vasily Grabin, the creator of many legendary artillery systems of World War II (guns ZiS-2, ZiS-3 and others) . Nikita Khrushchev's fascination with rockets led to the fact that the artillery was driven to the outskirts of the arms industry, and the former design bureaus and research institutes on this subject distributed to missilemen. So, about a hundred specialists turned out to be at the disposal of Korolev, who enthusiastically took up the idea of ​​working with solid propellant rocket engines that was quite understandable to them.

All this led to the fact that gradually the work, scattered and seemingly unrelated, concentrated and began to acquire real features. And then, according to Boris Chertov, “in November 1959, the quenching power of the Queen and annoying information from overseas worked at the highest level. A government decree was issued to develop a rocket at a range of 2500 km using charges from ballistic powders with a mass of the 800kg head part. The rocket was called PT-1. This was a government decree on the creation of a solid-fuel fuel tanker in the Soviet Union, whose chief designer was Korolyov. Immediately after the resolution was issued, it was assigned the index 8K95. ”

Solid "two"

Work on the solid-fuel rocket RT-1 stretched for more than three years - and ended, it would seem, a failure. A total of nine missiles were launched, but the results of these tests remained unsatisfactory. In fact, it turned out that the “powder-growers” ​​could only create another medium-range missile - in addition to the already existing P-12 and P-14, developed in the OKB-586 by Michael Yangel. It was clear that the military would refuse to accept it - and it was necessary to take steps to prevent the topic from completely closing.


A solid-fuel rocket RT-2 on a transport vehicle during the November parade in Moscow. Photos from http://kollektsiya.ru

Sergey Korolev found this solution by submitting to the government and achieving agreement on a project for a solid-fuel rocket RT-2 - a completely new one for Soviet rocket production. Another quote from the memoirs of Academician Chertok:

“Starting to work on a new topic, Korolev sometimes showed the breadth of the problem, which irritated high-ranking officials. He did not tolerate the principle “we will begin, and then we shall understand”, which was sometimes followed by very authoritative figures. From the very beginning of work on a new problem, Korolev sought to attract as many new organizations as possible, competent specialists, and encouraged the development of several alternative options in order to achieve the same goal.

Such a method of wide coverage of the problem often led to the fact that “on the way” to the final goal other, previously unplanned tasks were solved.

The resolution on the creation of an intercontinental solid-fuel rocket RT-2 can serve as an example of such a broad coverage of the problem. On the way to the final task, two more were solved: of the three stages of the intercontinental rocket were medium and short range missiles. The decree of 04.04.1961 of the year, issued before the end of the tests of the PT-1 rocket (8K95), was prepared for a long time. Korolev patiently conducted difficult and tedious negotiations with new people and leaders of not always loyal departments. The resolution approved and adopted for implementation the original project, which provided for three interconnected solutions for solid-fuel engines, which made it possible to create three missile complexes complementary to each other:

1. Intercontinental missile complex RT-2, mine and ground-based, with a three-stage solid-fuel mixed rocket, at a distance of at least 10 thousands of kilometers with an inertial control system. The rocket of the PT-2 complex was originally intended for a unified warhead with the same warhead that was developed for the P-9 and P-16, with a power of 1,65 megatons. The chief designer of the missile complex by order was Korolev.

2. A medium-range missile system - up to 5000 kilometers, land-based using the first and third stages 8K98. This rocket has been assigned the index 8K97. Mikhail Tsirulnikov, the chief designer of the Perm design bureau of mechanical engineering, was appointed the chief designer of the medium-range complex, he was also the developer of the first and third stages for 8К98.

3. The RT-15 mobile missile system, tracked, with a possible launch from mines, to a distance of 2500 kilometers. The launch launch vehicle has been assigned the index 8К96. For it used the engines of the second and third stages 8K98. The central organization for the development of the mobile complex was identified TsKB-7, and the chief designer - Peter Tyurin. TsKB-7 (soon renamed the Arsenal design bureau) to the beginning of work on rocketry had a great experience in creating artillery systems for the Navy. For all three missile systems, Korolyov was the chairman of the Council of Chief Designers. ”


Early prototype self-propelled launcher for the rocket PT-15. Photos from http://www.russianarms.ru

The project of a solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile, worked on by the royal OKB-1, eventually grew into the RT-2 rocket and its upgraded version of the RT-2П. The first was put into service in the 1968 year, the second came to replace it in the 1972 year and remained on duty until the 1994 year. And although the total number of deployed "twos" did not exceed 60, and they did not become a real counterweight to the "Minuteman", they played their part, proving that solid propellant engines are quite suitable for intercontinental rockets.

But the fate of the RT-15 was much more difficult. Although the rocket quite successfully passed the flight design tests and was even put into trial operation, as a result, it was not reached before being put into service. The main reason was that the designers of TsKB-7 did not manage to bring the control system RT-15 to a satisfactory state. But as a demonstration of the possibility of creating a mobile missile complex "Fifteen" played its role. And in fact, it paved the way for the 15P645 complex following it - the famous Pioneer developed by the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering under the guidance of Academician Alexander Nadiradze.

Продолжение следует ...
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    31 March 2017 07: 06
    It is no accident that the Molodets railway combat missile complex frightened overseas strategists so much that they insisted on its categorical disarmament. But no less problem for reconnaissance and, accordingly, targeting ballistic missiles are mobile complexes on a car chassis. Go find such a special car in the vast expanses of Russia, even if it is twice as big as an ordinary truck! And satellite systems cannot always help with this ...
    The Americans had their own BZHRK with an MX missile and it was no less scary for our Soviet leadership. Link to the site "Missile Technology". http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/mx/mx.s
    html
    But the Americans failed to create a soil complex.
    1. +5
      31 March 2017 10: 02
      It was developed. He was not in service. Shooting was mock as far as I remember.
      One of the reasons for refusal is too heavy composition i.e. high pressure on the ground and, as a consequence, the need to replace the railroad tracks, the second one is that many railways are in private hands, the third complex is disposable (the launch melted both the rails and the car)
      1. +1
        31 March 2017 10: 26
        Quote: ShadowCat
        One of the reasons for refusal is too heavy composition i.e. high pressure on the ground and, as a consequence, the need to replace the railroad tracks, the second one is that many railways are in private hands, the third complex is disposable (the launch melted both the rails and the car)

        I do not agree with the first paragraph.
        With the same eight axles, the load on the rails is roughly 22,5 tons per axle, and this is less than that of our Molodets. Our 25 tons per axle. The rest I agree. This is the data of the American BZHRK.
        Maximum firing range, km 9600
        Circular probable deviation, m 90
        Rocket diameter, m 2,34
        The length of the missile assembly, m 21,61
        Curb weight, t 88,443
        The mass of unloaded missiles, t 10,885
        Launch container length, m 20,79
        Diameter of the launch container, internal, m
        1. 0
          April 1 2017 07: 01
          With the same eight axles, the load on the rails is roughly 22,5 tons per axle, and this is less than that of our Molodets. Our 25 tons per axle

          Immediately upon the start of operation of the 23UTTKh, it became clear that only about 30% of existing railways can normally maintain the weight of the BZHRK. And even after the accelerated modernization of the tracks (at the expense of the Ministry of Defense), this percentage expanded slightly. The Americans had the same problems that the railway ownership was still superimposed on.
          As a result, all of our BZHRK only occasionally went on the route one at a time - and basically stood at the "standard parking lot".
          The rest I agree.

          Our unlike Yusovtsy managed to successfully solve the other problems of the BZHRK - they used the "mortar launch", developed a system for removing the contact network, made a simple and very stable automatic navigation system.
          1. +1
            April 1 2017 07: 28
            Quote: Nikkola Mac
            . The Americans had the same problems that the railway ownership was still superimposed on.

            The main problem for Americans is the ownership of railways. In contrast to Russia, the USA also has another movement organization. This is a separate topic, but if interested, the network is the "Encyclopedia of American Railways"
      2. +2
        31 March 2017 12: 03
        Quote: ShadowCat
        Shooting was mock as far as I remember.

        Martin Marietta XMGM-134A
        Photo: USAF


        The first launch of an ICBM in 1989 is a failure.
        The second launch of the 18 rocket on April 1991 of the year, made from the Western missile test site (Vandenberg Air Force Base, California). ICBM reached the crash site in the area of ​​the missile defense site on the Kwajalein Atoll (Marshall Islands, Pacific Ocean) in 30 minutes, flying 7300 km.

        Quote: ShadowCat
        One reason for refusal

        this is complete nonsense
    2. +3
      31 March 2017 12: 11
      Quote: Amurets
      But the Americans failed to create a soil complex.

      managed to create.
      refused in favor of SSBNs
      The launch systems of the Midgetman ICBMs were to be a four-axle tractor with a three-axle semi-trailer, on which a transport and launch container made of a new generation of organic fiber was placed horizontally, closed with sashes from special armored steel. In tests, the prototype mobile launcher - "Phoenix" showed a speed of 48km / h on rough terrain and up to 97km / h on the highway. The power plant is a turbocharged diesel engine with 1200 horsepower, the transmission is electro-hydraulic. Upon receiving a command to launch a rocket, the tractor stopped, unloaded the semi-trailer from the TPK to the ground and pulled it forward. Thanks to the presence of a special plow-like device, the semi-trailer was self-buried, providing additional protection against the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion. Further, the doors of the semi-trailer were opened and the transport and launch container was brought into a vertical position. The solid fuel gas generator, located in the lower part of the container, when triggered, threw a rocket to a height of up to 30m from the upper cut of the TPK, after which the first stage marching engine was turned on. To reduce the error in determining the coordinates of the starting position, the BGRK was to be equipped with satellite navigation systems.


      Martin Marietta teamed up with Caterpillar Tractor Company Caterpillar Tractor Company = HML (Hardened Mobil Launcher)


      The Boeing has teamed up with the Goodyear Aerospace (Loral Defense Systems Division) and PACCAR Defense Systems teams to create a similar vehicle (MGM-134 Midgetman Hardened Mobile Launcher)


      As a result of the tests, a unit developed by the Aerospace & Electronics division of the Voeing corporation was selected.
      Aerospace & Electronics' subcontractors were Defense Systems Division of Loral and Rolls-Royce Perkins. A modified version of this installation (ETU - Engineering Test Unit), which had its own name "Phoenix", arrived at Malmstrom AFB for further testing in December 1988.


      At first, the Phoenix was tested autonomously; later, an electro-transport ICBM was placed on it. Testing the "mortar" launch was carried out in 1987. during the throw tests of the ICBM model at the special stand of the Nevada Test Site training ground.
      The first complex was tested in December 1988, and four years later, in accordance with the Strategic Offensive Arms of the Midjitman missile, the work was completed.
      ==================================
      We must pay tribute to abruptly Poplar turned out: that the rocket (and it is clear MX) that the rocket
      1. +1
        31 March 2017 13: 57
        Quote: opus
        We must pay tribute to abruptly Poplar turned out: that the rocket (and it is clear MX) that the rocket

        Yes! Cool. Thanks Anton. But with the transmission, it seems to me too smart. It was only possible to dispense with electric. It would have been easier.
        1. +2
          31 March 2017 14: 17
          Quote: Amurets
          electric dispense. It would be easier.

          Ettt I'm not sure.
          97 km / h on the highway.
          They have no problems "Fools of the Road"

          I definitely don’t have roads (I’m looking at Peter with tears, snow has fallen, roads have gone too)


          SpaceX Falcon 9 on the Highway (I95) -VZIIIK (sho it was)?


          where the hell is Konanykhin?
          fool
          And then comes into effect His Terrible Majesty - Railway Dimension. You cannot change bridges, crossings, contact lines along the entire length of the route from the factory to the launch complex, so you must enter design in a maximum dimension of 3.7 meters.
          THREE WHOLE SEVEN TENTH faknashit meter. That's all you can. Do you understand? You, the lord of the United States, who has put everyone in cancer, are forced to reckon with the railway envelope.
          Oh Kay, cowboys, so what happens with our nine Merlins and railway gauge of 3.7 meter?
          1. +1
            31 March 2017 14: 52
            Quote: opus
            And here comes His awesome Majesty - Railway Envelope. You cannot change bridges, crossings, contact lines along the entire length of the route from the factory to the launch complex, so you must enter the design in the maximum size of the 3.7 meter.

            Anton! What do you say about our size?

            This is the GOST standard clearance gate and these dimensions also needed to be constantly coordinated or made according to the standard dimension

            Yes! As for the electric transmission. On TE-3 diesel locomotives, even of the first releases, the generator capacity was 1250 kW, and the diesel power was 2000 hp. The current is constant.
            1. +2
              April 2 2017 17: 45
              Quote: Amurets
              What do you say about our size?

              this is our karma.
              Regarding Konanykhin's insinuations ...
              Americans do not carry a train


              Quote: Amurets
              As for the electric transmission. On diesel locomotives TE-3,

              “Opaque”

              ZIL-135E
              1. +1
                April 3 2017 06: 21
                Quote: opus
                “Opaque”

                Anton! In principle, I am not a supporter of the use of electric transmission on rocket tractors. Difficult and unreliable. It will be argued that with solid-state technology, all problems have been resolved. Yes, nothing they are unresolved. On the railway, on hybrids, heaps of problems, counting batteries. About DET-250 is an example of a tank transmission that the military did not accept.

                And the DET tractors went with it only because the domestic hydraulic transmission did not go.
  2. +4
    31 March 2017 07: 16
    SPU "facility 815" of the complex with the RT-15 BRDS before the parade in Moscow, 07.11.1966/XNUMX/XNUMX
  3. +3
    31 March 2017 09: 49
    Anton! Thank you for the article. "Well broke" into a resource with interesting publications. In general, the history of the creation of rocketry is a big black hole. How much do we know about projects of the same MIT, alas, not implemented. About the same Agate?

    Quote: Amurets
    But the Americans failed to create a soil complex.

    Kolya! They have created. But by mutual agreement with us they did not continue to test and deploy. True configuration is different from ours, but nonetheless. We stopped working on the Courier, they are on the Dwarf
    1. +2
      31 March 2017 10: 12
      Quote: Old26
      Kolya! They have created. But by mutual agreement with us they did not continue to test and deploy.

      I didn’t know that. Thank you Volodya
  4. 0
    31 March 2017 13: 57
    first self-propelled ballistic missile

    Yes, damn it, I’m in insanity or something .... or were they going to carry it to America on a shoulder in a fit of enthusiasm ?????
  5. +1
    31 March 2017 20: 04
    Quote: Damir
    first self-propelled ballistic missile

    Yes, damn it, I’m in insanity or something .... or were they going to carry it to America on a shoulder in a fit of enthusiasm ?????

    Of course, the title is clumsy, the author still had in mind the mobile (mobile soil) complex. And as for America, it’s so medium range. That is, for Europe