"Emka": the history of the service car officer (part 2)

33
Favorite Marshal Zhukov

Despite the fact that the emka turned out to be much better than its American prototype, it was adapted for use in Russian conditions, its off-road qualities left much to be desired. Simply put, the M-1’s permeability was not up to par: front-line drivers remember well how much power they had to put on spring and autumn slush to get the emka stuck in an impassable ridge. And with what sincere envy they were escorting exactly the same in appearance of the car, who jokingly coped with the muddy road - all-terrain vehicles M-61-73! ..



"Emka": the history of the service car officer (part 2)

The all-terrain vehicle M-61-40 is on trial. Photo from snob.ru

The fact that the army car lacks permeability, the military began to speak almost immediately. The classic "emka" perfectly coped with the tasks of the staff car, when you did not have to go into serious off-road. But professional military men differ from all others in that they are obliged to think first of all about how and with what they will have to fight. And from this point of view it was clear: the ordinary M-1 cannot be considered an all-terrain vehicle, even with a very big stretch.

On this basis, by the summer of 1938, the command of the Red Army formulated a request for a passenger car-all-terrain vehicle based on the EMKI. Why the base chose this particular car is understandable: by this time the troops had gained enough experience in operating and maintaining the M-1 machines, the technical companies had an adequate supply of spare parts, and therefore it did not make sense to make a garden, creating an all-terrain vehicle on a new base and creating unnecessary difficulties for the military. At the end of July 1938, the design specification for the design of a comfortable all-wheel drive vehicle-all-terrain vehicle arrived at the plant, and the development team led by Vitaly Grachev (the future designer of the legendary GAZ-64 and GAZ-67B gas engines) began work.


The most common version of the "emki" all-terrain vehicle - the car M-61-73. Photo from the site http://ursa-tm.ru

First of all, they chose a modification of the emka, which could be taken as a basis. It was impossible to use the familiar 1 model on the M-1936 conveyor of the year model, which was well known to designers: its engine was too weak for an all-terrain vehicle. But by that time, GAZ had already begun work on a new engine - reincarnation (since the total amount of innovations and improvements was quite large) of the six-cylinder Dodge D5 engine, which received the national GAZ-11 index. It was he who became the heart of the future SUV based on the "emka".

Since the work on fulfilling the order of the military was in parallel with the modernization of the basic model M-1, it was decided to unify the new product with the modernized emka for the body and many other details, but with a completely different suspension and all-wheel drive. This was the most difficult task for designers: they had to quickly develop a driving front axle for the car and a transfer case, that is, to do something that in our country industrial, and not experimental scales, nobody did to them.


M-61-40 with a phaeton body overcomes the ford. Photo from www.autowp.ru

Nevertheless, the experimental design bureau of Vitaly Grachev coped with this successfully. Moreover, in the course of development, the designer had to solve an almost detective task: to unravel the secret of creating pivot hinges for the swivel wheels of the front drive axle: until then, in our country no one had developed and produced such nodes. It was not possible to buy a license for their production: manufacturers refused to the Soviet automobile plant. It was necessary to go for a trick: to purchase the model LD2, created by Marmon Herrington, which was engaged in tuning ordinary cars to off-road vehicles, based on the well-known Ford GAZ car with the V8 engine. Having received the pivots of this car, Grachev eventually figured out the principles and geometry of the hinge grooves - and developed his own king pin for the first domestic SUV.

By January 1939, the working drawings were ready, and the 10 of June of the same year, the first car - still experienced, not serial, was assembled and submitted for testing. The exam for the first GAZ SUV was to be harsh. He needed to be tested for durability and throughput in the most difficult conditions to make sure that the car was really able to drive where everyone else was saved. But Grachevskaya novelty coped with this!

Tests have shown that the all-terrain vehicle, which received the GAZ-61 index, has outstanding off-road qualities for its time and class. He could lift on hard ground up to 28 degrees, on sand - up to 15 degrees from the spot and up to 30 degrees from the course, with the fan belt removed, overcame a ford 82 centimeter deep, took 90-centimeter ditches and walked confidently along a forty-centimeter snow cover (this It turned out a little later, when the weather conditions allowed). With a full half-ton load, the car accelerated on the highway to 108 kilometers per hour, and on sand to 40 kilometers per hour. It is noteworthy that during the tests, the all-terrain vehicle was forced to climb the famous “Chkalov ladder” leading from the Volga embankment to the Nizhny Novgorod Kremlin. The car went up steadily, breaking 273 stone steps, and not in a straight line, but with turns - and proved its excellent off-road abilities. Thus was born the first in the world closed, comfortable SUV.


Modification of M-61-416 in the courtyard of the Gorky Automobile Plant. Photo from http://warspot.ru

By the end of 1940, by order of the People’s Commissariat of Heavy Industry, GAZ-61, in the sedan version with a closed metal body, received the 73 index, and in the “phaeton” version with the open one, GAZ-61-40 was launched. Since on the conveyor it was a much more complex machine than the non-wheel-drive M-11 (the same emka, but with the same new engine GAZ-11), it was decided to release the all-terrain vehicle in small batches for the higher command personnel. That is why GAZ-61-73 and -40 got the nickname “all-terrain vehicle for marshals”: ​​the most famous of its passengers were Georgy Zhukov (who, according to his chauffeur Alexander Buchila, preferred all such cars), Ivan Konev, Semyon Budyonny, Konstantin Rokossovsky and Semyon Timoshenko. In total, it was planned to release 500 all-terrain vehicles of both versions, but the war corrected these plans, and all 200 of such cars came off the conveyor: 194 in the 73 variant and six in the 40 variant.

"Emka" -protivotankist

Assessing the high off-road qualities of the new car, the designers of GAZ, perfectly feeling that the air smells more and more distinctly of war, thought about creating a light artillery tractor on its basis. Until then, the main force in artillery, especially small-caliber and anti-tank, were horses - but it was clear that they needed to be replaced with a car as soon as possible.
The idea of ​​gazovtsev was simple and logical: to connect the possibility of GAZ-61 with the appearance of the newly developed pickup GAZ-M-415, produced on the basis of the classic M-1 and well-developed. It turned out a sane machine that possessed only one unsuccessful feature for an army vehicle: with the closed cabin inherited from the "four hundred and fifteenth" and complex in form, it was unsuitable for fast and cheap production in wartime.


An experimental copy of the M-61-416 on trial. Behind attached a shell front, which was abandoned in the series. Photo from http://www.nika-limuzin.ru

It was necessary to find a way to simplify and reduce the cost of construction - and it was found. The designers of GAZ refused the closed cabin and then the doors. As a result, the car received the exterior of a classic army off-roader of the Second World War, which is well known from front-line photographs: an open cab with a canvas awning, instead of doors — openings with tarpaulins, a rectangular body with longitudinal benches behind, representing a shell box in which 15 shells were packed three canisters. In short, nothing complicated and superfluous, absolute practicality and lightness.

It was in such a simplified form that the first pickup GAZ-61-416 was assembled on the fourth day of the war - June 25 of the year 1941. The second copy was assembled for August 5, and in October, the 1941-th began the serial production of these machines. The simplified body was immediately adapted for artillery needs: shell boxes and other ammunition were placed under the longitudinal benches, and a trailer hitch, for which the gun was hooked, was placed at the back (it was possible to refuse from the shell front, connecting the benches and the shell box). Spare wheels were installed in the front fenders: they not only provided quick replacement if necessary, but also served as additional anti-bullet protection for the engine.


Reference sample car M-61-416. The shell box is clearly visible, at the same time being a seat for calculating the ZIS-2 gun. Photo from http://warspot.ru

Since the Gorky plant No. 92 located near GAZ by that time had already launched the production of one of the most successful anti-tank guns of the Second World War - the 57 mm ZiS-2 gun designed by the famous Vasily Grabin, there were no questions about what the GAZ-61 would be a tractor for -416. The first 36 (according to other sources - 37) vehicles assembled by the Gorky residents during 1941, received regular guns immediately upon leaving the factory - and headed towards Moscow, where they almost immediately went into battle. Alas, the first cars became the last: by the beginning of 1942, due to the loss of a significant part of metallurgical plants in the western part of the USSR, there was a shortage of automobile steel sheet, and the production of the all-terrain vehicle-tractor was stopped. Later, in June 1942, the Red Army command, which assessed the capabilities of the light anti-tank complex as part of the ZiS-2-GAZ-61-416, issued an order to resume production of a successful car, but this was no longer technically possible. By that time, all the GAZ-11 engines that were available went to the production of light tanks T-60 and T-70: for the sake of this, they were even removed from the M-11 modifications taken from civilian users.

From cars to armored cars

After the start of World War II, the vast majority of M-1 vehicles of all modifications turned out to be in the army. Machines that were in civilian use literally “called for” military service, compensating for the catastrophic losses of the first months of hostilities. In the case were all the options: and pickups, and phaetons, and of course, the most common closed model "emka". But there was another car that, with some stretch, can also be considered a modification of the GAZ-M-1 - the BA-20 lightweight armored car. This is what can be called the most military of all the variants in which the emka was issued!

Designing a new armored car, which was supposed to replace the FAI armored car that was in service with the 1933 of the year. The reason was simple: the base for the FAI was a GAZ-A passenger car, the production of which was rolled up for the sake of emoc. Accordingly, it was necessary to create an armored car on a new base - and it is completely logical that GAZ-M-1 became this base.


Armored BA-20 on maneuvers. Photo from http://bronetehnika.narod.ru

The design of an armored car based on it went almost in parallel with the preparation of the M-1 for placing on the conveyor. The result was that the BA-20 almost overtook the mother platform in serial production. The standardized version of the new armored car was prepared and handed over for testing in February 1936 of the year, and in July, when the emki began to roll off the conveyor in full swing, technical documentation was transferred to the Vyksa crushing and grinding equipment plant. Despite the strange name, it was precisely this enterprise located under Gorky that the BA-20 had to be adjusted.

In 1937, the BA-20 received a new conical tower, which became its main one, and a year later, the modernized model BA-20M appeared, which was distinguished not only by reinforced springs and rear axle, but also by thicker armor of the forehead and tower, as well as a new radio station which received a whip antenna instead of a handrail, which equipped the machines of earlier releases. Together with the new radio, a third fighter appeared in the crew - a radio operator who served it. They also reinforced the armored vehicle’s armament: in addition to the main DT machine gun mounted in the turret, another one of the same spare was now in the fighting compartment. True, they did not increase their ammunition: as before, it was still 1386 cartridges - 22 disc magazines.

A new armored car in the same 1936 year received another modification, rather unusual - BA-20ж / д. The additional alphabetic index was deciphered traditionally - “railway”. Such an armored car had, in addition to the usual wheels, four more replaceable metal ones equipped with a flange - a rim, the same as that of the carriage wheels, and could move on them along a railway track. For half an hour by the forces of the crew, the armored car turned into armored rubber, capable of passing from 430 to 540 km by rail. In this case, if necessary, for the same half hour, the armored rubber was converted back into an armored car: the removed automobile wheels were fastened along the sides.


Armored vehicle BA-20 in the rail version, mounted on rails. Photo from http://bronetehnika.narod.ru

BA-20 was so successful and easy to manufacture and maintain the machine that became the most massive armored car of the Red Army. In total, 1936 through 1942 year released 2013 (according to other data - 2108), of which 1557 collected before the start of World War II. This machine took part in all armed conflicts, wars and campaigns, starting with 1936: it passed the Khalkhin Gol and the Winter War with Finland, entered the Western Ukraine and Bessarabia during the Liberation March, and fought from the first to the last day of the Great Patriotic War , having even noted in the war with Japan in the late summer and early autumn 1945.

The crown of officer's career

Taxi, pickup, staff car, journalistic car, “all-terrain vehicle for marshals”, artillery tractor-SUV, armored car - in what guises did not appear the legendary emka! It is rightfully the first mass passenger car of the Soviet Union: the total production of all modifications of this car was almost 80 000 copies. And the overwhelming majority of them somehow took part in the Great Patriotic War - and many did not return from it.

“We have a reason to drink: for military wire, for Y-2, for emku, for success! ..”, - these words from the once popular Song of War Correspondents by Konstantin Simonov best describe the attitude towards M-1 on the war and after it. This legendary car has served what is called "from bell to bell" by entering history domestic automotive industry not only as the first Soviet car mass production, but also as a car-warrior. If the lorry produced by the same GAZ truck - a GAZ-AA truck - was called a soldier vehicle, then the emku can be rightfully called an officer vehicle. An officer who traveled from lieutenant to marshal - and passed him more than worthily.


War correspondent Konstantin Simonov (second from left, in profile) on the Kursk Bulge near the GAZ-M-1, which slid into a ditch. Photo from http://waralbum.ru

Sources:
https://ru.wikipedia.org
https://www.zr.ru
http://techno-story.ru
http://www.nika-limuzin.ru
http://wio.ru
http://armedman.ru
http://www.abs-magazine.ru
https://www.autowp.ru
http://avtomobilgaz.ru
http://www.birzhaplus.ru
http://bronetehnika.narod.ru
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    17 March 2017 06: 18
    And where is 1 part?
    1. +2
      17 March 2017 21: 09
      hi
      Maybe a typo and this is the 1 part?
      I found another typo:
      The second copy was collected to 45 of August, and in October 1941-th began the serial production of these machines.

      I remember, Munchhausen dated a statement on the divorce of 32 in May
      wink
  2. +5
    17 March 2017 06: 49
    At the end of July 1938, the terms of reference for the design of a comfortable all-wheel drive all-terrain vehicle arrived at the plant, and a group of developers led by Vitaly Grachev (future designer of the legendary GAZ-64 and GAZ-67B gaziks) started to work.

    The legendary "Grandfather" as Gracheva was called already on ZiL created not only the GAZ-64 and GAZ-67B. This is the ZIL-485 (BAV-485) and a whole series of ZIL-135 vehicles. Since Vitaly Anreevich was engaged in the construction of special equipment, his name still remains little known, unlike his legendary cars. And probably the most legendary machine Gracheva was "Blue Bird"
    1. +6
      17 March 2017 06: 53
      The legendary machine for astronauts ZiL-4906 "Blue Bird".
      And then we write about cars and forget about those who created these machines. Much about Grachev’s work is in E. Kochnev’s book "Secret Cars of the Soviet Army."
      1. +3
        17 March 2017 08: 37
        Quote: Amurets
        The legendary machine for astronauts

        I allow myself to correct you a little, the machine is not for astronauts, but for their search and rescue hi
        1. +2
          17 March 2017 08: 41
          Quote: veteran66
          I allow myself to correct you a little, the machine is not for astronauts, but for their search and rescue

          Sorry, the stylistics let us down, this is my mistake, but I think it does not detract from the merits of V.A. Gracheva.
          1. +3
            17 March 2017 09: 27
            Quote: Amurets
            but I think she does not detract from the merits of V.A. Gracheva.

            but where are we to “dump” such a genius? laughing
  3. +2
    17 March 2017 08: 18
    Although it’s not a child for a long time, I know that history does not suffer a subjunctive mood, but sometimes it’s a shame to the devil that the war began when the USSR was “barely prepared.” For a whole year, or even less, was not enough fist, and on the forehead.
    1. +2
      17 March 2017 08: 35
      Quote: 505506
      when the USSR was “a little bit prepared.” The whole year, or even less, was not enough to make a fist, and even on the forehead.

      The complete rearmament of the Red Army was planned for the 42nd year, but, as you know, people are not fighting weapons. The training of the command staff left much to be desired, while the Hans already had practical combat experience. Given these factors, only a preventive strike by the USSR against Germany could exclude those victims that our people suffered in that war.
      1. +2
        17 March 2017 08: 54
        “people are not fighting weapons,” of course, yes. But such a naive belief that we simply did not have enough time.
        1. 0
          17 March 2017 09: 28
          Quote: 505506
          But such a naive belief that we simply did not have enough time.

          it's hard to disagree with you.
      2. +2
        17 March 2017 11: 01
        Quote: veteran66
        only a preventive strike by the USSR against Germany could exclude the sacrifices that our people suffered in that war.

        Less Rezun need to read!
        1. +3
          17 March 2017 11: 45
          If only Rezun. V.D. Danilov, M.I. Meltyukhov, V.A. Nevezhin, B.V. Sokolov, Yu.N. Afanasyev, etc. etc. And also translations of the Gillesen, Hoffman, etc.
        2. 0
          17 March 2017 12: 03
          Quote: V.ic
          Less Rezun need to read!

          And then Rezun? you have few examples from life? Tried to sit in the 41st and what? Until Moscow and Stalingrad, they sat out, 60 million people remained in the occupied territory. The advantage of the one who hits first and the Germans in WWII proved it.
          1. +3
            17 March 2017 13: 11
            Quote: veteran66
            First beat

            The advantage of one who is experienced is fully mobilized. The "liberation campaign" of the Red Army in September 1939 and the "winter war" of 1940-41. revealed the unpreparedness of the Red Army for a big war. The Soviet attack on Germany would have reminded a “hitting” of a pioneer athlete against a professional boxer (with quite obvious results), with the loss of the image of peacekeepers, etc. After all, in 1914 Rennenkampf and Samsonov (professionals, however!) Popped into East Prussia in order to seize the landver for the "German Faberge" ... Remember the result?
            1. 0
              17 March 2017 13: 37
              First of all, let me say that the "winter war" was a little earlier, from November 30, 1939 to March 12, 1940.
              Quote: V.ic
              The Soviet attack on Germany would have reminded a “hitting” of a pioneer athlete against a professional boxer (with quite obvious results), with the loss of the image of peacekeepers, etc.

              In this regard, and together with the "liberation campaigns" and the occupation of the Baltic states, the image of the USSR peacekeepers was kakbe "tarnished", so you should not worry about it. As for the Pioneer’s “hitting” the boxer, on June 22 it turned out exactly the opposite which is much worse. Your comment about
              Quote: V.ic
              the unpreparedness of the Red Army for a big war.

              at least incorrect, since the USSR was ready for a big war, the economy was mobilized, reserves were prepared. The Red Army was just not ready for a surprise strike, which was used by the Germans and the Red Army command had to fight according to the rules that the attackers imposed. You yourself know the results.
              Quote: V.ic
              After all, in 1914 Rennenkampf and Samsonov (professionals, however!) Popped into East Prussia in order to seize the landver for the "German Faberge" ... Remember the result?

              nothing to do with it at all, they had as much experience as the Germans did, and the troops were mobilized, but the Germans were smarter, unfortunately. But the lack of fear of losing the mythical image of the “peacekeepers” made it possible to wage war without sacrificing their large territories, but in many ways even on enemy territory.
              1. 0
                18 March 2017 10: 40
                in what place was the USSR ready for a big war? and what kind of "sudden blow" is it? not to notice about two hundred divisions on the border it must be not only blind and deaf it must be dead ...
      3. +2
        17 March 2017 13: 29
        Complete rearmament of the Red Army was planned for the 42nd year

        full would not work. It would not be possible to make the required number of new tanks, submachine guns, new howitzers and anti-aircraft artillery. I wonder what roles radio communication and, most importantly, motor transport played in rearmament. It seems to me that you can treat the "allies" as you like, but we achieved the necessary motorization of the army only in the 43rd year thanks to the supply of a large number of trucks.
        1. +2
          17 March 2017 13: 48
          Quote: Mikado
          full would not work. It would not be possible to make the required number of new tanks, submachine guns, new howitzers and anti-aircraft artillery.

          and how much is needed? At the beginning of the war, we had only the latest T-34 and KV tanks, more than 1200, and this was only the beginning of production, the Germans were willing to use our captured antiaircraft guns, in general, there were enough weapons even in June 41, but if not for this or not this (the result of a surprise attack), then to
          Quote: Mikado
          the supply of a large number of trucks.

          one could not have resorted to from the allies.
          1. +2
            17 March 2017 14: 53
            mechanized corps states watched? how many tanks relies how many cars? consider that most of the cars - one and a half, "Gazelle" in our opinion. It is impossible to supply such a colossus to them. Radio stations? I bet if it weren’t for the war, then the mechanized corps staff would not have changed until the 42nd year. And we would have gotten it wrong already in the 42nd, on the offensiveas some patriots want. with respect, hi The feeling that the first photo is most likely a traffic jam formed at the crossing, and covered by aircraft, or burnt due to a lack of fuel (again, there were few tankers too!). Perhaps this is just a "hodgepodge" of different retreating units.
            And the significance of the surprise of the attack and the Germans holding the initiative is your true truth, I agree 100%! hi
            1. +1
              17 March 2017 16: 03
              Quote: Mikado
              mechanized corps states watched? how many tanks relies how many cars?

              I agree that the motorization of our troops was lagging behind what was desired, but, nevertheless, I was very surprised at the bewilderment of the Germans (I read the memoirs of their uninhabited veterans) to saturate our troops with equipment. Second, the Polish company was by no means an easy walk for the Germans; Halder had it in his diaries. So the chance not to lose so much equipment, people and territory in the first year of the war was a good one.
              Quote: Mikado
              The feeling that the first photo is most likely a traffic jam formed at the crossing and covered by aircraft,

              This is Karelia, there are few roads, the chances cut one of them, as a result, I had to drop everything and leave. But this is not the point, there were just a lot of such “traffic jams” in the first months of the war, i.e. equipment and weapons were simply abandoned, not even lost in battle. The result of imposing on our command the rules of the game by the Nazis.
              1. +3
                17 March 2017 16: 39
                the Germans were shocked by the saturation of our troops with self-loading rifles. But they still had more trucks. Isaev wrote that they only in Denmark, Holland and Benelux mobilized as many cars as ours planned to get by mobilization from the national economy. And most importantly, their subdivision structures were balanced, and control systems were debugged to the limit, plus combat experience. In fact, there were many systemic problems due to which our army was worse prepared for war than the German. A discussion of them, this is already from the category: "Uuuhh, we would give them if they caught up with us!" drinks
                1. +2
                  17 March 2017 16: 45
                  Quote: Mikado
                  A discussion of them, this is already from the category: "Uuuhh, we would give them if they caught up with us!"

                  but I am not a supporter of hat-making politics, and "in a foreign land by a mighty blow" most likely, it would remain only in the song. Yes, they would wash themselves with blood, but, I repeat, such losses of people, equipment and territories of the first days of the war would hardly have happened. Then, it’s no secret that the troops were taught to advance, but they were afraid to even talk about retreat. So it was necessary to do what they knew how, they got all the knowledge in the “Finnish” and in the khalkhin goal hi
                  1. +2
                    17 March 2017 16: 50
                    received. And the correct conclusions were made (except for the composition of the mechanized corps) - in terms of supply, training, etc. But the experience was still much less than that of the Germans. There is a wonderful essay, “The Day of the Division Commander,” the general meaning of which is that everyone, both commanders and soldiers, learned to fight. Unfortunately, not everything was put into practice before the war ..
                    1. 0
                      17 March 2017 16: 57
                      Quote: Mikado
                      But the experience was still much less than that of the Germans.

                      so who argues with this? But what was left to do? Sitting and waiting when the first hit? Wait, but what came of it?
                2. +1
                  17 March 2017 18: 10
                  Quote: Mikado
                  But they still had more trucks.


                  The Germans at the beginning of the war captured in warehouses a large number of not only weapons, but also Soviet motor vehicles, in particular ZIS-5 and GAZ-AA. Used them long enough in the photo shows that even registered put their numbers. The first winter for the Germans in the USSR 1941-42. Outwardly, our trucks are in excellent condition for the winter of 1941-42.

                  1. +1
                    20 March 2017 09: 43
                    good photo. Rather, I think. not in warehouses, but abandoned during the retreat due to lack of fuel. It seems to me that we didn’t have a reserve base then, in the army there were not enough cars anyway.
      4. +2
        17 March 2017 15: 25
        Quote: veteran66
        The training of the command staff left much to be desired,

        The command personnel from lieutenants to colonels of the initial period of the war fought well.

        But the training of the bulk of the generals and almost all the marshals, their readiness for war was simply disgusting and the results of their activities were tragic for ordinary soldiers, middle-level commanders and naturally for the civilian population.
        1. +1
          17 March 2017 16: 05
          Quote: Ivan Tartugay
          But the training of the bulk of the generals and almost all the marshals, their readiness for war was simply disgusting

          So I wrote about them, about senior officers, I would not have been so categorical, in the vast majority they came to the regiments from companies and battalions, experience was not enough.
  4. +2
    17 March 2017 12: 25
    This machine took part in all armed conflicts, wars and campaigns, starting in 1936: it went through Khalkhin-Gol and the Winter War with Finland, entered Western Ukraine and Bessarabia during the Liberation Campaign, and fought from the first to the last day of World War II having even managed to be noted in the war with Japan in late summer and early fall of 1945.
    Blimey! I thought that all armored cars were killed in the 41st, but then I got to Berlin! And in the chronicle and in the photo of the second half of the Second World War I did not even see them
    1. +1
      17 March 2017 15: 30
      about Berlin from the pre-war BA, units reached headquarters, but armored battalions reached Vyborg in the 44th. By the middle of the war, pre-war BAs, in large part, remained in the Far East, and on the Leningrad Front (due to its static nature), and it was on the LF that they took an active part in the battles. During the breaking of the blockade on the ice of the Neva, following the erupted infantry, the T-60 and Ba-10 were first launched as reinforcements with equipment - ice kept them!
  5. +2
    17 March 2017 19: 43
    Quote from the article:
    That is why the GAZ-61-73 and -40 received the nickname "all-terrain vehicle for marshals": its most famous passengers were Georgy Zhukov (who, according to his driver Alexander Buchil, I preferred just that to all other cars).

    According to the memoirs of A Buchin, the driver Zhukov, the GAZ 61-40 and GAZ 61-73 cars were not used by either Buchin or Zhukov. Despite the high cross-country ability, they were uncomfortable and Zhukov preferred the German all-terrain vehicle Horch to all other cars, with a powerful 160 horsepower engine, heating, windshield and rear window defroster, taken from the garage of the German Embassy in Moscow at the beginning of the war.
    From the memoirs of A. Buchin:
    What can I say, German masters worked solidly. This all-terrain vehicle had a long life ahead of us - mainly G.K. Zhukov traveled along front-line roads the next two years with a little.
  6. Alf
    0
    17 March 2017 19: 55
    Anton! You are not quite right about the GAZ 61-416. There was no such serial car; there was a GAZ-61-417.
    In the summer of 1941, the designers of the Gorky Automobile Plant, based on the experimental GAZ-61-415 all-wheel drive pickup truck, developed an all-wheel drive artillery tractor capable of pulling an anti-tank 57-mm ZIS-2 gun along the road and at the same time carrying calculation and ammunition in the back, which received the designation GAZ- 61-417.
    GAZ-61-417 Note: “There are disagreements about the index of this car. In some sources, it is designated as GAZ-61-417, which is logical, since this model was built after the appearance of experimental samples of GAZ-64-416. However, in a correspondence in 1941 of the Gorky Automobile Plant with the Main Artillery Directorate of the Red Army, the artillery tractor appears under the GAZ-61-416 index, and no other documents with this designation were found. ” From June to November 1941, 36 artillery tractors GAZ-61-417 were manufactured (2 prototypes and 34 prototypes in October).