Automatic rifle M231 Firing Port Weapon (USA)

28
One of the main methods of creating a new small weapons is the processing of existing samples. On the basis of serial weapons are created new models with enhanced performance or other advantages over their predecessors. In some cases, new projects are created in order to obtain certain special features. It is for this reason that the M231 Firing Port Weapon automatic rifle was created by the American defense industry.

The project of a new automatic rifle, which has a distinctive appearance, was originally part of a larger program to develop new weapons and equipment. In the mid-sixties, the Pentagon launched the Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle program, the purpose of which was to create a promising armored vehicle for transporting soldiers with weapons. The end result of this program was the M2 Bradley infantry combat vehicle, which went into series and became widespread. Together with the armored vehicles under the MICV program, some other new products should have been created. In particular, the military demanded the development of special small arms.




General view of the M231 FPW rifle. Photo Imfdb.org


The MICV program’s technical assignment stipulated the use of airborne embrasures of the troop compartment, with which the soldiers could fire at the enemy from their personal weapons, while remaining protected by armor. However, it soon became clear that regular M16 rifles cannot be used for such purposes. An unacceptably long rifle could not ensure the proper comfort of the soldiers. Moreover, in some cases, the shooter would not even have the opportunity to insert his weapon into the embrasure due to problems with his ergonomics. It became clear that for equipping onboard embrasures, some new weapon with high firing characteristics and acceptable dimensions is required.

In 1972, the Rhode Island Arsenal received a new mission. Using existing products and developments, Arsenal specialists had to create a promising model of small arms, fully compatible with the embrasures of the new BMP. The main objective of the project was the development of weapons with certain dimensions. In addition, the new model was to differ from the existing ones by some increase in firepower. The project of advanced weapons for armored vehicles received the designation Firing Port Weapon - “Weapons for firing through the loopholes”.

Soon, Rock Island gunsmiths came up with three options for the new weapon. The first preliminary draft suggested the use of a heavily redesigned M3 submachine gun from World War II. The second project involved the use of a converted Heckler & Koch HK33 automatic rifle. The third and final proposal involved the creation of a new weapon based on the standard M16 army rifle with a significant redesign of its design.

Automatic rifle M231 Firing Port Weapon (USA)
Handguard, adapted for use with an embrasure BMP. Photo Augee / Ar15.com


For some time, parallel development of three projects has been carried out. In 1974, the customer compared the available offers and made his decision. On the basis of the calculated characteristics, the third project was the most successful, based on the M16 automatic rifle design. It was decided to continue work on this project while closing the other two. The remaining project received a new working designation XM231.

It should be noted that the XM231 project was only based on the ideas and aggregates of an existing automatic rifle. The requirements of the military to the FPW product, related to the improvement of the main characteristics, as well as the specifics of the use of such weapons led to the appearance of noticeable differences. In particular, the characteristic feature of the new rifle was to become a different “heavy” barrel, with the help of which it was planned to ensure the possibility of long-term shooting at a higher rate. In addition, in order to increase the rate of fire automation has undergone notable differences. The design changes used suggest that, unlike the basic M16 product, the new XM231 was not an automatic rifle, but a light machine gun.

Numerous refinements of the original design clearly affected the timing of the project. By the mid-seventies, the product XM231 was able to bring to the test, but the test and the subsequent refinement took a lot of time. During the finalization of the project, it was decided to abandon the previously proposed shoulder rest, change the means of fastening the rifle in the embrasure, and also reduce the rate of fire. The first two changes were related to the safety of the shooter: during the tests, it became clear that the rifle could fly off with insufficiently strong mounts and injure the fighter with the butt. The requirement to reduce the rate of fire, in turn, was caused by the need to save ammunition and defeat targets. With the current rate of fire, a fighter could devastate a shop in seconds without any special results.

All the necessary work to improve weapons continued almost until the very end of the decade. Only in 1979, the prospective weapon was declared ready for use and recommended for use. The automatic rifle was standardized under the designation M231 Firing Port Weapon.


Rifle without forearm. Photo Augee / Ar15.com


From the point of view of some basic features of the design, the new model was a direct development of the existing M16 rifle. The already tested layout with a receiver box divided into two “receivers”, gas automatics with a piston mounted on a slide frame, etc. were used. At the same time, an updated design of the firing mechanism, advanced fire control devices and new elements for interaction with embrasure were used. Externally, the new M231 rifle looked like a serial M16, which received a new forearm and lost its stock. The degree of unification was 65%.

The main element of the design of the rifle for the BMP, as in the case of the base model, was a metal receiver, divided into two articulated devices. The upper part of the box had a cylindrical internal channel with several additional slots, stops and windows necessary for the installation of the bolt group. The lower "receiver" had a store front shaft, and in its rear part were placed the details of the firing mechanism. In addition, this element of the receiver had a ring to install a cylindrical recoil spring, taken out of the weapon.

The product M231 FPW received a rifled barrel caliber 5,56 mm, which is a modified unit of the basic rifle. Because of the need for long firing, the barrel of a new weapon was distinguished by a greater wall thickness. It was originally proposed to use a barrel with a length of 280 mm (50 gauges), but during the refinement of the weapon, this parameter was increased to 396 mm (71 caliber). The barrel was equipped with a slot-type flame arrester borrowed from the M16. In the middle part of the barrel there was a gas outlet, through which the powder gases were supplied to the piston. As in the case of the base sample, a gas tube of small cross section was installed between two large bushings placed on the central and breech parts of the barrel. The front hub received a spiral protrusion necessary for proper interaction with the BMP embrasure.


The return and buffer springs are removed. Photo Augee / Ar15.com


For the M231 rifle a new shank was developed. It consisted of two symmetrical halves and could be removed from the weapon. Handguard had metal parts, trays, interacting with the sleeves of the trunk. Plastic covers were mounted on top of these devices. This handguard differed from the standard with a smaller length and dimensions that meet the new requirements of the customer.

New rifle retained the existing design of the bolt group. Its main element was a massive frame moving in the cavity of the receiver. At its front end there was a slot for the installation of a butterfly valve. Above, it was planned to install a short gas piston that does not extend beyond the bounds of the receiver. The barrel was locked by turning the bolt with several lugs.

The structure of automation initially included only one return spring, located behind the bolt group, in the receiver and the rear casing. Calculations and tests have shown that with this design the rifle can show technical rate of fire more than 1220 shots per minute. Such characteristics were considered redundant for the intended method of application, because of which the project was finalized. Two additional buffer were placed on a common guide rod with a return spring. Increasing the rollback time, it was possible to reduce the rate of fire to acceptable values.

The most important feature of the M231 Firing Port Weapon product was shooting from the open bolt. Before firing, the slide group was retracted and fixed there with a sear. She moved forward only after pressing the trigger. Such a refinement of automation allowed to improve the cooling of parts, but demanded the use of a redesigned firing mechanism. So, the place of the trigger took a sear that blocks the shutter. The design of the automatic fuse-translator of fire has changed accordingly.


Details of the firing mechanism. Photo Augee / Ar15.com


Unlike the base rifle, the new M231 could only fire in bursts. The choice of such a shooting mode or blocking the trigger was carried out using a standard flag on the left surface of the weapon. It is noteworthy that the small flag was supplemented with a large plate with holes. The latter was intended to protect the pins of fastening parts USM from external influences.

The rifle for the BMP was supposed to use an intermediate cartridge 5,56x45 mm NATO. The ammunition was supplied from a standard 30 magazine with ammo capacity. Cartridges were removed from the weapon through a window in the right wall of the receiver. As with the M16, the ejection window was covered with a movable lid. The rifle was offered to be completed with a fabric bag for collecting spent cartridges.

The specificity of the intended use has affected some of the design features. So, the new rifle did not get the usual sights. The upper carrying handle remained, but there was no movable adjustable rear sight on it. Removed and stand with the front sight on the trunk. For a very rough aiming, the upper U-shaped tray of the handle could be used as a sight. In addition, it was recommended to use only tracer cartridges for tracking the results of shooting with a new rifle. Apparently, the authors of the project considered that the shooter would not be able to realize all the advantages of a conventional sight when firing from a moving armored vehicle.


Flap fuse-translator flag. Photo Augee / Ar15.com


One of the reasons for the rejection of the M16 rifle as a weapon for firing from onboard embrasures was its long length, directly related to the use of a rigid butt. For this reason, the M231 butt has not received. From the receiver came out a cylindrical casing return spring, but it was not installed any butts or other products. At the same time, a number of serial rifles for infantry fighting vehicles received simple wire shoulder stops, mounted directly on the rear end of the spring case.

With the 396-mm barrel, the M231 Firing Port Weapon rifle had a total length of 717 mm — nearly a foot shorter than the earlier versions of the M16. The mass of weapons without a magazine was 3,33 kg. A regular magazine on 30 cartridges added 460 to the weight. The technical rate of fire reached 1220 rounds per minute, but was reduced to 200-300 rounds using buffer springs. In a combat situation, the practical rate of fire should not exceed 50-60 rounds per minute. The effective firing range was set at 300 m.

"Weapons for firing through the embrasure" was put into service in 1979 year, shortly before the start of mass production of the newest BMP M2 Bradley. An order for the mass production of new weapons was received by Colt, a little earlier joining the project as one of the developers. Soon the army received the first M231 serial products, which were later introduced into the armored vehicles complex. The design of the "Bradley" machines included the installation of two embrasures on each side of the troop compartment and two similar devices in the rear sheet and the door. Thus, each BMP could carry and use up to six rifles of a new type.

In the late eighties, the production of the upgraded infantry fighting vehicle M2A2 started. It differed from the base sample by a number of changes, including new side screens. The presence of these products overlapped the embrasures of the troop compartment and excluded the use of small arms. Later versions of the M2 Bradley also lost the ability to fire through the onboard embrasures. However, the M231 rifles were not excluded from the weapon system. Now such weapons are transported in the packing of the troop compartment and can be used under certain circumstances. Regular use, however, is no longer foreseen for objective reasons.


M231 rifle in the rear door embrasure of the M2 Bradley BMP. Photo Chainlinkandconcrete.blogspot.fr


When developing the M231 Firing Port Weapon project, a number of specific requirements were taken into account, directly related to the need to fire through the embrasure. Because of this, such a rifle has some features that seriously distinguish it from the base M16. The M231 product has a greater muzzle flash and other recoil parameters. Handguards special design can be very hot when shooting, and the absence of the usual butt makes it difficult to hold. Finally, the rifle needs a bag-catcher bag. With all the restrictions and rules of treatment, weapons can be used as a conventional automatic rifle outside the armored vehicle.

Officially, the special M231 Firing Port Weapon rifle is still in service with the US Army and remains part of the armament of an infantry fighting vehicle. However, due to the gradual modernization of the fleet of vehicles and the introduction of on-board screens that block the embrasures of the troop compartment, the number of actively used weapons was reduced. To date, the original model has the status of exclusively auxiliary weapons, necessary for the most extreme case. Full operation in the original quality, for obvious reasons, stopped and is unlikely to ever resume.

The M231 automatic rifle project is of particular interest in the context of the development of small arms. The reason for his appearance were some of the shortcomings of the existing rifle systems, namely, the excessive length of regular army rifles. This problem was solved by creating a new model based on the existing structure, but having a lot of differences. The emergence of a new specialized rifle allowed to close the existing niche for the next few years, until its disappearance, due to the further development of armored fighting vehicles.


On the materials of the sites:
http://militaryfactory.com/
http://ar15.com/
http://chainlinkandconcrete.blogspot.fr/

Detailed photo review rifle:
http://ar15.com/forums/t_3_123/459672_M231_Firing_Port_Weapon_Review________56K_MASSACRE______________.html
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    17 March 2017 15: 36
    To the disgrace, a highly specialized sample, it simply does not have the right to exist at the present time.
    1. +11
      17 March 2017 16: 10
      Wasn’t it easier to design a car for a rifle than to design a rifle for an BTR?
      1. +4
        17 March 2017 16: 27
        layout with receiver box divided into two “receivers”, gas automatics with piston
        Author: Kirill Ryabov

        As for gas automatics with a piston, is this exactly about the M16?
        In the middle part of the barrel there was a gas outlet, through which the powder gases were supplied to the piston.
        Author: Kirill Ryabov

        What nafih piston? In the M16, powder gases act directly on the slide frame.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +3
            17 March 2017 19: 31
            Quote: AlexMark
            Apparently the piston was inserted into the construction, which did not protrude beyond the bounds of the receiver.

            Excuse me, where is the piston?
            Chris Bishop writes in the book “Small Arms”: Due to the absence of a piston, gases are diverted back through the gas tube directly into the barrier frame, which moves backward under the influence of gases.
            I enclose a photo of the same rifle, which Cyril did not add to the article. Where do you see the piston?



            The part that is attached to the bolt carrier is called the bolt carrier key, not the gas piston.
            In the Armalite nomenclature, this part is called the Bolt Carrier Key .223 / .308 EB0150
            1. 0
              18 March 2017 05: 50
              Excuse me, where is the piston?

              Three hundred times it’s kind of discussed where the M16 has a piston, and again twenty-five:

              The Lungman AG-42 and MAS49 do not have a piston as a separate part - they really have powder gases directly affect the bolt frame.
            2. 0
              18 March 2017 19: 21
              Quote: Mister X
              The part that is attached to the bolt carrier is called the bolt carrier key, not the gas piston.
              In the Armalite nomenclature, this part is called the Bolt Carrier Key .223 / .308 EB0150

              Brownells .... nice shop. for picking ARs
        2. +5
          17 March 2017 19: 35
          I agree, lured warm with soft. Pardon me feel My apologies, delirious something on Friday
          1. +2
            17 March 2017 19: 49
            Quote: AlexMark
            I agree, lured warm with soft. Pardon me

            It is pleasant to communicate with a person who listens to arguments and admits his mistakes.
            Quote: AlexMark
            My apologies, delirious something on Friday

            It's okay, colleague! drinks
            By the way, how did you delete the comment? In the previous version of the site, comments could be edited / deleted within a few minutes after its publication.
            1. +4
              17 March 2017 19: 58
              If you click on the "More" button, then "Edit" and "Delete" appear. Don't misunderstand, I just didn’t want to produce the nonsense that I wrote) Clasped, of course, notably ... you can't argue) It's a shame, damn it (((
              1. +1
                17 March 2017 20: 06
                Quote: AlexMark
                If you click on the "More" button, then "Edit" and "Delete" appear.

                The functional is known to me. Just before, a user could edit his comment for a limited time. Then the recording was blocked from recording / deletion.
                Quote: AlexMark
                just did not want to produce nonsense, who wrote)

                I would do the same.
                Quote: AlexMark
                Kosyaknul, of course, notably ... you can not argue) It's a shame, damn it (((

                We all make mistakes ...
                1. +3
                  17 March 2017 20: 10
                  It is especially nice when an adequate response to errors smile
                  1. +1
                    17 March 2017 20: 47
                    In the course that most Sabatti rifles have multiradius barrels?
                    I can throw you their directory. True there is no Urban Sniper ...
                    1. +2
                      17 March 2017 22: 38
                      Already saw (((And the characteristics saw ... Lancaster is with all the consequences ... Disgusting characteristics (((As they wrote in the next topic - shoot at banks only if No. Although it may be suitable for hunting at a distance of 200-300 meters, I don’t see what’s the advantage over a normal rifle. As always, "having no analogues in the world" laughing
    2. +2
      17 March 2017 17: 01
      On the contrary, what the doctor ordered. Look at its characteristics. Better than the M-16 and its descendants in all cases when the weight of the wearable ammunition is not particularly significant.

      That is, its use on infantry fighting vehicles, MRAP, other armored vehicles, at stationary checkpoints is not justified, it is preferable to the use of full-time infantry armaments.
      It’s even strange that the Americans practically do not use it.
      1. +3
        17 March 2017 21: 24
        Look at its characteristics. It is better to M-16 and its descendants in all cases when the weight of the wearable BC does not really matter.

        Javadxan - they re-established the stop and so controversial apparatus. fool
        From it, it was possible to shoot at least relatively single in a clean and dry place - and here the butt was broken off, the sights were torn with meat and, in addition, only from the open bolt and without single shots. request
        Yes, it would be better if a DT would be pushed into a sleeve - at least it could be pulled out on the parapet and the enemy could be given away - and what to do about it. what
        Sincerely ...
        1. +3
          18 March 2017 10: 24
          Quote: Lekov L
          From it, it was possible to shoot at least relatively single in a clean and dry place - and here the butt was broken off, the sights were torn with meat and, in addition, only from the open bolt and without single shots.

          Take MRAP, for example, a vehicle that must be resistant to explosions and effectively fight back from ambushes.

          In order to fight back from an ambush, loopholes in the sides are necessary for the possibility of creating a high density of fire. To suppress an ambush with fire. Quick create.

          But at the same time, using the standard weapons of the "landing" is not a very wise decision. Their full-time armament during movement should not be in the hands, but in special clamps, otherwise it will become dangerous if it is undermined.
          So, we need a model of weapons that is constantly in the loophole, does not interfere with the movement of people in the airborne compartment, and has a high rate of fire to compensate for the lack of a stabilization system. M231 is quite suitable for these tasks.
          1. +2
            18 March 2017 15: 14
            hi
            Quote: Spade
            Take, for example, MRAP,

            You all say it right, but do not forget that the project XM231 was developed in the middle of 70-x. At that time, there was no MPV or MRAP technique yet. Besides, it's kind of like wheeled armored vehicles.
            Quote: Spade
            during armament, regular weapons should not be in the hands, but in special clamps

            Absolutely agree with you. And again, do not forget that in those years, the first representatives of the class MPV or MRAP (South Africa and Rhodesia) did not have either of these clamps, nor special chairs, or retrofit tanks.
            Quote: Spade
            A sample of weapons is required that resides in a loophole, which does not interfere with the movement of people in the troop compartment

            And here I am with both hands for! But look at competitor M231 from Germany. Which sample will be less likely to interfere with moving around the troop compartment: a modified M16 with a sticking stub or HK33 with a full-fledged retractable butt? Which sample is more convenient to use?
            My opinion is that the Americans stupidly did not let the Germans into their market and lobbied for a less suitable weapon. But the American.


            An early version of the HK33 for the MICV program with a sleeve, retractable butt and magazine for 40 cartridges.


            Modified HK33 for the MICV program with a rifle mount in a loophole and a quick-detachable barrel.
            1. 0
              18 March 2017 17: 26
              Quote: Mister X
              And here I am with both hands FOR! But look at the competitor M231 from Germany.

              As for me, both are not perfect. I didn’t write about a specific sample, but about the principle itself. The need for specialized rifle complexes for firing amphibious assault targets in modern conditions, on the contrary, is increased.
              Well, in terms of the device ... Perhaps, two barrels are needed to increase the density of fire, perhaps there is a need for an even higher rate of fire, maybe you should finally give a damn about the need to leave the possibility of using the machine outside the pivot installation
              1. +2
                18 March 2017 19: 33
                Quote: Spade
                Perhaps you need two trunks to increase the density of the fire,

                You are probably familiar with the SALVO program.
                As part of this program, manufacturers have developed rapid-fire samples. Some of them offered double-boosted ammunition to increase the density of fire.
                And Springfield Arsenal and Olin / Winchester even offered double-barreled systems for a two-cartridge cartridge.
                As a result, this program was closed, as it did not lead to the creation of such a system, which would be a worthy replacement for M16.

                Winchester salvo rifle


  2. +2
    17 March 2017 15: 43
    Thanks to the author for an interesting article! For the first time I learned about this sample.
    For me, this is a good example of the "development" of the defense budget. Having the M16 rifle at that time and the experience of its use, including in conditions of limited space of the B113 MXNUMX corps, and to put forward requirements for promising infantry fighting vehicles using amphibious assault on-the-fly standard weapons is a good “bookmark” for substantiating future R&D.
  3. +1
    17 March 2017 16: 41
    This article is for all spitters on the AKS-74U! Look and feel. wink
    1. +3
      17 March 2017 17: 10
      Quote: Svetozarny
      This article is for all spitters on the AKS-74U! Look and feel.

      Uh ... And the AKS-74U is generally on which side?
      M231 is a step from the standard rifle towards the machine gun. Our “shortening” is a step in the opposite direction.

      What are the main complaints against the AKS-74U? Cooling problems. M231 with a heavy barrel and shooting with an open shutter by default is better in this parameter of its "source" M-16.
      1. 0
        17 March 2017 17: 13
        I mean that, too, a stub.
        1. 0
          17 March 2017 17: 16
          No, it's a completely different bit.
          1. +1
            17 March 2017 17: 44
            Quote: Spade
            No, it's a completely different bit.

            But our stub is better! wink
            1. +6
              17 March 2017 19: 16
              It’s just that Ksenia should be able to use, and she will be Ksenia, and not the “bitch” as many call her.
  4. +2
    17 March 2017 19: 54
    Need this ...... in the BMP, like a dog's brake light. Although it is possible - this is a new type of brake light.
  5. +2
    18 March 2017 03: 40
    Americans are such Americans!