Reflex Scope PC-12

53
The collimator sight PK-12 was designed by the scientific and production unitary enterprise “Scientific and Technical Center LEMT”, which is part of a large Belarusian holding BelOMO. The company was founded in 1992 in the framework of structural restructuring. At present STC "LEMT" ("Lasers in ecology, medicine, technology") consists of four design bureaus, as well as pilot and mass production. The company, located in Minsk, specializes in research, development, production and modernization of various optical-electronic and laser devices, both civilian and military.

The BelOMO brand itself needs no introduction. The Belarusian Optical-Mechanical Association has a rich history and is one of the largest optical companies in Eastern Europe. It was created in 1971 on the basis of the Minsk Mechanical Plant. He was one of the leaders of the optical industry of the Soviet Union, here the tasks of civil and military instrument engineering were successfully solved. The company gained great fame thanks to one of the most popular SLR cameras in world history - the famous Zenit-E camera.



One of the new Belarusian manufacturers is the PC-12 collimator sight. According to the official website of the manufacturer, it is designed for automatic assault weapons, including equipped with grenade launchers. It can withstand loads up to 1000g for a short time. The PC-12 sight provides operation in various background illumination conditions: from white winter snow on a bright sunny day to nighttime conditions of use when the shooter uses a night-vision device.

Photo: lemt.by


In the modern world, collimator sights are becoming more common not only in the military sphere, commercial models are actively used by hunting enthusiasts. The collimator sight has a very important advantage compared to traditional open sights - the speed of aiming with its use is about 2-3 times higher. This is a very important feature in the conditions of a fleeting modern battle. When aiming with a collimator sight, the shooter must combine only two points - the red luminous mark that the shooter sees through the eyepiece and, in fact, the goal itself, while the eye of the arrow is accommodated at a distance from the target (in mechanical sights - usually on the front sight, the sight and the target visible out of focus).

The Belarusian collimator scope PC-12 is also known by its export designation PC-28S. The sight was, on its own initiative, created by the specialists of the STC LEMT BelOMO especially for the promising Russian AK-12. This sight was created taking into account the advanced experience in the creation and operation of army collimator sights, it meets all the most important criteria for such sights, which are applied to commercially available general military equipment:

- maximum simplicity of the sight design;
- long duration of work and use of standard batteries - AA battery;
- small dimensions;
- high resistance to critical overloads.

Photo: lemt.by


The latter property is not accidental, it was dictated by the need to share a fighter and a collimator sight on the machine, and grenade launchers such as GP-25, GP-30 and GP-34. During a shot from a grenade-launcher grenade launcher of this line there is a significantly greater recoil momentum than when fired from another equally common, but already American, M203 grenade launcher. At the same time, the machine itself in combat conditions is subject to significant overloads, which leads to the loosening of the main components and a decrease in the service life of the firearm and its “body kit”. Modern electronics to such shock loads is even more susceptible. Very often this leads to knocking down the amendments, as well as disrupting the functioning of collimator and optical sights, causing damage. Taking this into account, the Belarusian developers, while designing the PC-12 sight, laid a higher load threshold - up to 1000g (with the standard for such sights - 300-500g).

The developers proceeded from the fact that in modern war the under-grenade launcher became almost an integral part of the machine gun. For example, during the fighting on the territory of Chechnya, grenade launchers were equipped with up to 90% of all machine guns. And in the modern Russian ADS machine gun, which is designed for combat swimmers, the 40-mm under-barrel grenade launcher is an integrated part of the weapon itself, that is, the ADS is already in essence a rifle-and-grenade launcher complex.

From a technical point of view, the Belarusian PC-12 collimator sight is a further development of a whole line of BelOMO PC-01 sights, which are currently produced in 8 in various modifications and are analogous to Aimpoint's Swedish collimator sights 2. In particular, the modification of this sight PK-3ВС was adopted by the Ministry of Defense and the border troops of the Republic of Belarus.

Photo: lemt.by


The sight belongs to the collimators of the closed type. It is mounted in a massive cylindrical sealed enclosure (able to withstand immersion to a depth of 5 meters). Front and rear sight can be closed with hinged covers. The lens diameter was increased to 28 mm, this is done to increase the field of view. The aiming mark is made in the form of a red dot with angular dimensions 1,5 MOA, it has 8 of different brightness gradations for working in different lighting conditions. Even with a minimum battery charge, the sight can function, it carries out adjustment of the brightness of the aiming mark depending on the degree of battery discharge.

The sight is able to function in the temperature range from -50 to + 50 degrees Celsius, which is a good indicator for such devices and makes the scope suitable for use in arctic conditions and in the subarctic climate, unlike most Western European sights, which are designed for freezing temperatures -25 ..- 30 degrees. The sight is powered from the only standard AA battery, which is located in a cell on the side of the sight, so to change the battery there is no need to remove the sight from the weapon. The mass of the PC-12 sight does not exceed 300 grams. Experts note that in the near future the civilian version of this collimator sight can also enter the market, which will be in demand provided the product is adequately priced. There is a demand for such products from hunters and shooters-athletes, especially when it comes to reliable and durable optics.

Information sources:
http://www.znk.by/arhiv/04_06_2016/lemt.pdf
http://lemt.by/pritsel-kollimatornyiy-pk-12
https://www.all4shooters.com/ru/strelba/optika/NTTS-LEMT-BelOMO-novyy-kollimatornyy-pritsel-PK-12
http://belomo.by
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    6 March 2017 07: 02
    I had a Zenit-E with a Helios lens - a cool thing for an amateur. I think the sight will be on the level.
    1. +5
      6 March 2017 08: 57
      “Zeniths” also made Krasnogorsk
    2. +1
      6 March 2017 14: 36
      And what just do not come up with for the murder? Business and nothing personal! I wonder how many steps a yakut will get a squirrel in the eye from a conventional screw cutter without an optical sight? recourse
      1. +19
        6 March 2017 15: 19
        Quote: siberalt
        in how many steps will a squirrel get into the eye from an ordinary screw cutter without an optical sight?

        - what do you think is "ordinary screw cutter"?

        - if this is the case, then (1) BCC without a telescopic sight - this is somehow strange; (2) there is no difference in the eye or nose. the squirrel will still be headless.
        - and to shoot the squirrel "in the eye" makes sense from the small things (0,22).
        - this, in your opinion, is the "usual screw cutter", right? laughing

        The waves ... fell with a swift jack ... everyone fell, and fell ... request
        1. +3
          6 March 2017 21: 14
          He shot at the squirrel, from the bottom up, from the small things. He aimed at the jaw, all the same, the Bosko was torn off.
          1. +3
            6 March 2017 21: 17
            Quote: wagner72
            He shot at the squirrel, from the bottom up, from the small things. He aimed at the jaw, all the same, the Bosko was torn off

            - I honestly have never tried, never happened.
            - IMHO about the "squirrel in the eye" - it's still a bike, no more.
            - and in your case - there is either a weak squirrel or a bullet bent and with a displaced center ... or ... well, I don’t even know request laughing
          2. +1
            8 March 2017 18: 21
            Shot at a squirrel ... a Bosko was torn off.

            Don't you feel sorry for the squirrel?
      2. +5
        6 March 2017 16: 16
        Quote: siberalt
        I wonder how many steps a yakut will get a squirrel in the eye from a conventional screw cutter without an optical sight?
        For proteins in the eye from screw cutters do not shoot. The bullet will tear the rodent to shreds.
        1. 0
          14 March 2017 08: 34
          "To get a squirrel in the eye" is just a figurative, exaggerative saying.
          1. +1
            23 March 2017 19: 13
            not quite a bike ...
      3. +3
        8 March 2017 20: 39
        Quote: siberalt
        I wonder how many steps a yakut will get a squirrel in the eye from a conventional screw cutter without an optical sight?

        If necessary, a large number of assassin recruits will be called up from the country's mobilization resources, which must be trained in shooting techniques within an hour or two. The outcome of the conflict will depend on how exactly this contingent will be trained in competent methods of warfare. Yakuts will not solve the problem. Weapons must be made for the rapid development of the mass army.
    3. +1
      7 March 2017 01: 28
      The Minsk camera was called Zenit-ET. Produced at the Belarusian Optical and Mechanical Association from 1982 to 1995 year.
      1. +2
        7 March 2017 03: 19
        Quote: Duke
        The Minsk camera was called Zenit-ET. Produced at the Belarusian Optical and Mechanical Association from 1982 to 1995 year.

        Nevertheless, "Zenith trademark belongs to KMZ" ... (Krasnogorsk Mechanical Plant)
  2. +4
    6 March 2017 07: 27
    subject to adequate product prices
    Why never indicate the price? am
    1. +6
      6 March 2017 09: 22
      NcStar D3RS135 collimator sight (USA) with red, green and blue mark? It costs 10 p.
      The Aimpoint Micro H-1 (2) collimator sight (USA) under Weaver / Picatinny (2MOA, 12th century bright length 62mm, weight 84g.) Costs 38 000 r.
      Collimator sight PK-01VM / weaver (Belarus) costs 16 p.
      Aimpoint Micro T-1 under Weaver / Picatinny (2MOA, 12st. Bright, NV mode, length 62mm, weight 84) 67 000 rubles.
      PC 12 so far no prices ... but I think a piece of dead American presidents ...
      SPECIFICATIONS:
      Lens diameter of the lens - 28 mm
      1x magnification
      Alignment Range - ± 1 °
      Aiming mark size (red dot) - no more than 1,5 MOA
      Grads of brightness of an aiming mark - 8
      Power Supply - 1 x AA
      Tightness (immersion) - up to 5 m
      Operating temperatures - from -50 ° С to + 50 ° С
      Loads - 1000g
      Weight, not more than 300 g.
      1. +4
        6 March 2017 09: 51
        Belarusians decided to crush advertising? am
        Schwabe updated PKU-2
      2. +4
        6 March 2017 11: 49
        some weight is not clear ...
        let's say on Aimpoint Micro T-1 - there is data like yours "weight 84", but there is:
        1 - Weight, g. 215 - collimator with covers, bracket and battery, 240 - in a box.
        2 - Weight sight only (incl battery): 84 g, (3,0 oz)
        Weight conf: 116 g (4,1 oz) incl. Lens covers and mount

        as for the PC-12 itself, the "Mass of the sight of the PC-12 does not exceed 300 grams" - in my opinion, all the same ...
        1. +2
          6 March 2017 13: 10
          Weight walks because someone points with a mount (bracket), covers, etc. and someone without!
          For example: Aimpoint Comp M4S Collimator Sight (2MOA, 16st Subsoil, including 7NV, weight 265 gr .Length 120mm), and full: 405 - a collimator with covers, an arm and a battery, 500 - in a box.
      3. +1
        7 March 2017 05: 16
        300 gr And why not the floor. kilogram?

        The weight is big. The sizes are big. Why an AA battery? There are enough tablet batteries for a year. Yeah ... I wanted the best, but it turned out as always.

        In the photograph, the soldier looks through the collimator, like through an optical sight. Is he the first time he sees a collimator?
        1. 0
          13 March 2017 18: 36
          Quote: gladcu2
          In the photograph, the soldier looks through the collimator, like through an optical sight. Is he the first time he sees a collimator?

          Look at what and How it is installed. belay
        2. 0
          April 6 2017 20: 55
          Quote: gladcu2
          . Why an AA battery? There are enough tablet batteries for a year.

          but in order that in case of war it would not be necessary for the batteries to crawl across the front line ... And the AA capacity is more than that of tablets with the same filling
    2. 0
      6 March 2017 13: 21
      The article does not say a word about the possibility of working together with NVD
      1. +3
        6 March 2017 14: 05
        Quote: Skubudu
        The article does not say a word about the possibility of working together with NVD

        And the third paragraph ?! ... using the night vision device when using the shooter ...
        PC 01 (previous version) no problem, naturally this one
        You can read in detail here: http://belomo.by/catalog/optical-and-optoelectron
        ic-products / priceli_kollimatornie_dlya_strelkovog
        o_orujiya / pk-01bd
  3. +5
    6 March 2017 08: 37
    Up to -50, and how will the battery work in such a cold?
    1. +5
      6 March 2017 10: 51
      In the cold, items stored in the bosom Yes
      Frost resistance of different types of batteries and accumulators
      (data for current consumption ~ 100-200 mA)
      Type Capacity at temperature -20 ° C in comparison with + 20ºС
      Saline (baht) 0%
      Alkaline (baht) 7%
      Lithium (baht) 25%
      NiMH (battery) 30%
      NiCd (battery) 75%
      1. +1
        6 March 2017 11: 37
        This is certainly good, but not too convenient, pull out the batteries, thank you for the table, interesting data.
        By the way, I read about paint with micro-vacuum spheres of 1 mm which provides a decrease in thermal conductivity of more than 5 cm glass wool.
        http://ctv7.ru/news/innovacionnye-tehnologii-v-ha
        kasii-kraska-vmesto-teploizolyacii
        1. +4
          6 March 2017 13: 56
          By the way, I read about paint with micro-vacuum spheres of 1 mm which provides a decrease in thermal conductivity of more than 5 cm glass wool.
          http://ctv7.ru/news/innovacionnye-tehnologii-v-ha
          kasii-kraska-vmesto-teploizolyacii

          This "innovative" paint is already "a hundred years old at lunch", for example, the American ThermoShield paint has been on the market for more than 20 years. In fact, the heat-insulating properties of all these paints are equivalent to 13-15 mm of mineral wool.
  4. +7
    6 March 2017 09: 01
    Quote: cth; fyn
    Up to -50, and how will the battery work in such a cold?

    I don’t think for long. In general, Belarusian optics are very solid. My PSO is on a carbine manufactured in BelOMO. It’s very reliable.
    1. 0
      6 March 2017 11: 43
      Yes, it’s clear that the optics are good, but the question of cooling the battery arose by itself.
      1. +2
        6 March 2017 13: 43
        acho incomprehensible? :) the battery in the cold stupidly flies in. and at the most inopportune moment. only hardcore only mechanics.
  5. +3
    6 March 2017 10: 07
    to shoot from the AKS74U no sight is needed at all
    1. +6
      6 March 2017 11: 38
      Oh well, on Toz 106, too, they’re modeling optics and not without success.
    2. +13
      6 March 2017 12: 06
      To shoot - is not needed. I need it. to hit :)))
  6. +1
    6 March 2017 12: 05
    300 grams is a lot!
    1. +1
      6 March 2017 12: 38
      But 1000q load, even with a brick pound laughing
    2. +3
      6 March 2017 13: 51
      What is it very then? Do not forget his 28mm lens ...
      untwisted Aimpoint Comp M4S 265 gr. with covers and bracket 405 gr ...
      Take it hard Russian PKU-2 from Shvabe 140 gr. with bracket!
  7. +11
    6 March 2017 15: 05
    Quote: siberalt
    I wonder how many steps a yakut will get a squirrel in the eye from a conventional screw cutter without an optical sight?

    How much I don’t know, but all the one-eyed squirrels in Yakutia say laughing
    1. +2
      6 March 2017 16: 41
      and always turn to the shooter with the blind side so that they don’t shoot in the eye ... winked
      but, here's another question, why do not make sights with natural light. Or mixed. The first I learned about, the American "quick poiht" had just that and was intended, including for shooting at dusk
  8. +1
    6 March 2017 16: 42
    And what just do not come up with for the murder? Business and nothing personal! I wonder how many steps a yakut will get a squirrel in the eye from a conventional screw cutter without an optical sight?

    From the beginning it is necessary to find such a Yakut, because I personally know a considerable number of Yakuts with problem vision. But even if we find it, we still won’t recognize it, since after getting such a bullet into a small rodent it will be impossible to find not only the inlet, but in general to distinguish what and where is located. The day will be spent searching for fragments of the body and an unknown amount of time for folding the mosaic from what was a squirrel.
  9. +4
    6 March 2017 19: 21
    Twenty-five again .... Tovarischi collimator scope was created as an uncontested "alternative" to a mechanical scope. Or in addition to mechanical ring sights due to a strong drop in light-transmitting ability depending on the time of day (most NATO sights are ring sights). In the dash, it’s clearly clearly visible in the ring .... looking through it at dusk and you won’t see just anything .... then you need a red dot ... Damn it ... any red dot is aimed at a direct shot distance depending on caliber. For example (I’ll explain roughly) setting it to the “point” a hundred meters to get to 600 will not work. Bullets go down. Critics say they need to raise the red mark by eye ..... Yeah, "on ....... a mound" as in an ankdote. In most mechanical sights there is a function of compensating for bullet burning along a ballistic curve. Those same numbers in meters .... Another argument, they say faster aim .... With what tomatoes? Has anyone ever seen athletes shooters on a ramp or monastery with collimators? Maybe they don’t know about this device?
    Another argument, they say, all the special forces in the pictures "in varnish" ..... In the first in the pictures or in the games there are always basically all kinds of "deltas" ... Secondly, I personally feel a bit violet what they are on and what, even in thongs let them run, according to their fashionable trends. They have nothing to do with Russian special forces. In the third, special forces often work at dusk and at short distances, where the red dot is needed. Because you can’t just not see the mechanical fly. I own a couple of years of detailed sights for several years, and in practice I came to the conclusion that he didn’t fall. The previous model was a Belarusian such a batwa ... Sold fuck.
    1. +1
      6 March 2017 19: 43
      Put a plus, and to a large extent I agree. these sights on the smoothbore of an amateur are useful, acquiring and at dusk. But at the stand they really quickly become unnecessary, because with a good shooting the shooting goes “on the sensation” literally like from a slingshot
    2. +4
      7 March 2017 00: 19
      The main shootings take place at a distance of up to 300 m - I mean combined-arms operations with ordinary regular small arms. In this case, the weapon must be fired at the rear sight of a direct shot at a distance of 25-50m to the center of the torso of the growth target. Then aiming without changing the rear sight at the center of the torso at any distance up to 300m will lead to falling within the body. Such a sighting allows you not to be distracted by making amendments to the sight during short-lived battles. Similarly, the collimator shoots at the mark in the place where the bullet hit the above technology from the same distance. And then the collimator will allow you to open fire earlier, and get there than with a regular mechanical sight (any), since it needs to combine only one mark, and not two, on the target.
      1. +2
        7 March 2017 01: 05
        Mil people, "you check or ride?" Or look cool? If you just make some noise and the white nozzles on the trunk are more than enough. A collimator is not necessary for this. In addition to growth goals, there are many more. And for what you described, there is a letter "P" on the whole. In addition to it, there are many other numbers that allow you to fire deep into the front. On the essence, you propose to abandon any scope of the sight except the distance of a direct shot. This is at least somewhat ... presumptuous. I’m not talking about the effectiveness of such shooting .. About other things such as batteries or the reliability of the on-off sensor, the size of the light pillar on the target at which the diameter of even the smallest one will block a person’s height by 300 meters, I’m just talking about it all. In my time, in the Airborne Forces, recruits were selected who could easily combine believe not only the rear sight and the front sight, but a lot more. I checked it on my own experience in a warm mountain climate ....
        1. 0
          7 March 2017 05: 31
          tracer

          Red dot, it will be better than the front sight and the rear sight. Especially in the forest. There is less distance. Therefore, the aiming speed is more important. And at 300 m, it’s possible to remove red dot in time, if you don’t like it.
          Then collimators have not only a dot, but also a circle with a dot. And then you and the correction for the wind and the height.

          With collimators, correct collimators, quick transfer of shooting to another target. Since you look with two eyes, you see the whole picture and only bring the point to the target.
          1. +1
            8 March 2017 20: 36
            Sorry, dear, I remember you are very passionate about airsoft. Well, between real weapons and airsoft, there is, as it were, a very big difference. And also, I advise you not to close your second eye even when shooting airsoft. Your one statement on this subject immediately tells me that you have nothing to do with shooting and shooting sports. Consequently, your advice has the same weight. I appreciate your comments on another occasion on the site. But an armory ... not yours.
            1. 0
              11 March 2017 18: 48
              Yes, the attitude towards real shooting is small. He served in several armies.

              But pumped with all kinds of information on small arms. At the very top.

              When you have installed the collimator correctly. And it’s right to put it in the center of the mass of the rifle and a little further away from the shooter. Then you have the following. You see the big picture of the battlefield. When the target appears, you point the red dot at the target without releasing the target from the overall picture. Just the hands at the direction of the brain perform the task of pointing the red dot. The analogy with a computer shooter is 100%.

              Aiming speed is not likely. I managed to hit the heads of the players at 50m. In half a second.

              Without a collimator is much more complicated. Time to install the stock in the shoulder, again finding the target, combining the direction of the weapon on the target, combining sights. Wild horror. 2-3 seconds.
        2. +3
          8 March 2017 02: 29
          For comrades who, apparently, have a collimator sight, and a mechanical one too, have only seen in the figures :))) Here is a table of the range to the target for the sight (for information, the collimator mark does not overlap the target’s contour :)))) PS And there is still such a concept as nastilnosti. And the mark on the whole "P", I will disappoint you, does not mean at all that the bullet at this distance flies perfectly evenly :))) You were taught shitty in the highlands :)))
          1. +4
            8 March 2017 20: 49
            Dear friend, thank you for reminding me, a former sniper of 21 brigades, then included in the Novorossiysk (Raevka) ... About the ballistic trajectory of the bullet and the features of its flight in the highlands from the heart ... Thank you. Only the article is not about that. An article about the fact that Belarusians have messed up the device for the army, which, in practice, isn’t needed in the troops. They put on the AKSU, smiled .... Do you remember the sector switch on the AKSU? So a person with normal vision perfectly sees at this distance without any problems.
  10. +1
    6 March 2017 19: 26
    But the 5.45 or 7.62 × 39 riflescope specially tailored for these calibers, with the correct aiming grid, open corrections drums, that would be good ...
  11. +6
    6 March 2017 19: 35
    With laser target designations, at least everyone calmed down and thanks for that ..
  12. +3
    8 March 2017 01: 18
    Quote: alex-cn
    and always turn to the shooter with the blind side so that they don’t shoot in the eye ... winked
    but, here's another question, why do not make sights with natural light. Or mixed. The first I learned about, the American "quick poiht" had just that and was intended, including for shooting at dusk

    We open the PBP-1B scope guidance manual, which belongs to the group of collimator sights, (the same one with which our pilots fought the whole WWII, jokingly decoded it like this; Device (var. Sight) Beating On the forehead - 1 time, It hurts). It says that its main difference is that all collimator sights use a grid light with an electric bulb, the brightness of which is regulated by a rheostat depending on the background of the terrain, and for PBP-1B it is used ... grid light from natural daylight. from natural daylight it provides good visibility in any position of the aircraft and in any background of the terrain ... " At dusk and at night, the backlight is also an electric lamp. This is for a minute 1941! A small mirror in an airtight housing was added to the design, well, then there were no fiber-optic materials. The ideal design solution is a self-regulating device (grid brightness), which, due to the gratuitous resource (daylight), maintains a rational ratio of the grid brightness, relative to the background brightness - the grid is slightly brighter. Next I have a question; Why a point, not a grid? Well, at least primitive at 0-20 in all directions. Another size of one and a half thousandths, not a candle to God, not a damn poker. The figure of the infantryman going to the attack has a width of 0,5 m, then if the point covers it completely, the distance is 0.5 x 1000: 1,5 = 333,33333333 M IN THE PERIOD! Well, just the pi number really. Of course, I understand that supposedly shooting - now - is carried out - at distances - no more ... But it’s ridiculous, but if not at these distances, then. And how do you tell me to determine the corrections for the wind that "carries the bullet" by the point, and even with such a clumsy multiplicity. How to calculate by counting: The wind relates the bullet in such a way as to drop two from the sight and divide into two. If there was a grid, then there would be no problems with corrections and crosshairs, turn to be guided no worse than a point. No, YOU however you want, but this is not serious.
    1. 0
      10 March 2017 17: 04
      I simply did not know about this sight, I’m not too interested in aviation, but thanks ...
      And the rest is disbelief in batteries with high humidity and frost, sad conclusions after water trips and winter hunting ...
    2. 0
      20 March 2017 17: 17
      Not seriously at this sight most likely with the time of work;) As for the reticle: take a look at the eotek. That's better this is not necessary. And what ... lateral corrections when shooting from a reddot ???)) It is up to 100m and 200-300 with a magnifier, and this is no longer for ordinary fighters.