Red berets vs blue helmets: Russian peacekeepers will bring order to Syria

39
Red berets vs blue helmets: Russian peacekeepers will bring order to Syria


The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation published a training manual, which will guide the Russian military police when conducting special operations in Syria.



The duties of the "red berets", as they were christened for the bright subject of the uniform, will include the protection of Russian military personnel, primarily employees of the reconciliation center and sappers. Also, the Russian police will carry out patrol functions, and fight the terrorists who are still short of the Syrian army.

It is no secret that after the liberation of cities from terrorist oppression, there remain a lot of secret agents of militants. Over time, these militants form underground cells of terrorists, after which the question arises of re-cleansing the city by the military.

Russian police will prevent the spread of terrorist metastases. The Syrian military, who are leaving the city in pursuit of militants fleeing to the east, can be sure that they are leaving the rear in the hands of professionals.

Red berets work within the centers for reconciliation of the warring parties and in their arsenal there are impressive opportunities for “forcing terrorists to peace” - these are special means and firearms weapon.

Military experts point out that the Russian military police in Syria is actually a completely new structure. It performs both the usual functions of the military police and the peacekeeping mission. It is very likely that the “red berets” will become a world precedent, and in the future it will be from this unit that they will take an example when conducting peacekeeping missions around the world, and the blue helmets of the UN will disappear.



The Syrian army yesterday drove the terrorists out of Palmyra and is moving inland. The leaders of ISIS realized that the defeat of the group was inevitable; therefore, they issued a directive on the transition to predominantly sabotage methods of struggle. The publication of the manuals of the Russian military police is a kind of response to the militants - the Russian Defense Ministry is ready for any action on their part.

At the final stage of the war, it is worthwhile to act without undue haste, carefully preparing each subsequent step, not allowing the terrorists to take advantage of even the slightest opportunity to turn the situation to their advantage. Bringing the Russian military police to work in Syria is just a brilliant example of this strategy. Now we can say with confidence that cities freed from terrorists will remain such once and for all. Good luck in the work of our guys!
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    4 March 2017 06: 24
    Also Russian the police will carry out patrol functions, and fight against the uninhabited terrorists of the Syrian army.

    In my opinion, this is the business of the Syrians themselves,

    VKS is normal and necessary, and “land” is Syrian responsibility.
    1. +7
      4 March 2017 06: 31
      VKS is normal and necessary, and “land” is Syrian responsibility.

      Responsible is not enough. There is a gradual pulling into the war.
      1. +9
        4 March 2017 08: 01
        Russian police will prevent the spread of terrorist metastases. The Syrian military, who are leaving the city in pursuit of eastward fighters, can be sure that they are leaving the rear in the hands of professionals. - from article

        The sad news. Russia is increasingly drawn into the Syrian civil war. What for?
        There is no longer any accumulation of “combat experience” here, as our commentators wrote about the Russian Air Force participating in this war. These are police functions.
        1. +10
          4 March 2017 08: 20
          And our leadership has constantly stated that there will be no ground operations. And so it turns out that we first defend the sappers, then we clean out the unfinished militants, and then the Syrians peacefully smoke bamboo and agree among themselves, and we are waging a full-fledged war. Already as "occupiers". Doesn’t resemble anything?
    2. +8
      4 March 2017 10: 19
      Quote: Olgovich
      Also Russian the police will carry out patrol functions, and fight against the uninhabited terrorists of the Syrian army.

      In my opinion, this is the business of the Syrians themselves,
      VKS is normal and necessary, and “land” is Syrian responsibility.

      Already discussed, leaving them now is to spit on everything that has been done and get a new war in a year!
      Watch a video about our police in Syria, I think a lot of questions will be removed:
    3. +2
      4 March 2017 10: 52
      [quotePublishing a training manual of the Russian military police is a kind of response to the militants - [/ quote]

      Terrorists are not beaten by training manuals, but exclusively by weapons and only by weapons, the language of power is the only language that is understandable to them ... And the anti-sabotage struggle, especially in BV where suicide bombers are in full use, is a rather difficult task even for specially trained structures, and not VP, which has its own tasks ....

      in the future, it will be from this unit that they will take an example when conducting peacekeeping missions around the world, and the UN blue helmets will sink into oblivion.

      It began, then at the same VO there were so many cries that the VP was not needed, and now, every day, then the praises addressed to her - it’s time to calm down not to lose the sense of proportion and not to rush to extremes ...
      For the author’s information, there is a part specially prepared for peacekeeping operations, our troops are in the blue helmets and bury them early, although their effectiveness is not always at their best ...
      It would not be necessary for the author to run ahead of the engine and declare an unconditional victory - in war, as a war, anything happens, in Palmyra, after all, they also held a concert ...
      There are still a lot of things to do in Syria, and everything is not so simple there, as it seems to some "strategists" like the author ...
    4. +1
      5 March 2017 12: 30
      Apparently, the reality is that, leaving these functions in the hands of the Syrians themselves, all efforts to liberate Aleppo and Palmyra will come to naught ...
  2. +4
    4 March 2017 06: 31
    From the article it is clear that the work ahead is complicated, and the volume is large. Good luck and no loss to the guys.
  3. +3
    4 March 2017 06: 48
    "It is very likely that the" red berets "will become a world precedent, and in the future it will be from this unit that they will take an example when conducting peacekeeping missions around the world, and the UN's blue helmets will sink into oblivion."

    But what about helping the legitimately elected president of South Vietnam with the Viet Cong terrorists as an American military? Something I do not remember the case that the counterguerrilla actions of the interventionists would bring someone fame
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. +4
        4 March 2017 07: 19
        But the military police aren’t meant to conduct a counter-guerrilla war. For this, completely different units were created which are now transferred to the National Guard under the authority of the National Guard. In general, Mr. Novitsky is in a hurry making a statement at the end of the article about the final stage of the war in Syria
        1. +2
          4 March 2017 08: 47
          Chechen special forces will cope perfectly with police tasks.
          1. +2
            4 March 2017 10: 12
            This is Russia so getting rid of terrorists and Chechens, they say let them kill each other. The usual colonial policy.
            1. 0
              9 March 2017 09: 02
              Actually, funds are pumped out of the colonies. And here is the opposite.
          2. 0
            6 March 2017 07: 03
            There is nothing to profit from. Sadness.
    2. 0
      4 March 2017 11: 48
      the legitimately elected president of South Vietnam

      Do not tell with strange phrases, a brief reference to the "legality" of the first South Vietnamese president coming to power.
      The reunification of the country was supposed to be carried out after the general free elections, which were to be held no later than mid-1956.
      On July 16, 1955, Zieh announced that South Vietnam would not comply with the Geneva Agreements, there would be no general elections and that there should be an anti-communist state in South Vietnam. In October of that year, he held a referendum on which the question was raised whether to remain South Vietnam as a monarchy or become a republic. Ziem announced that, as a result of the referendum, the monarchy was abolished, and proclaimed himself the first president of the now “Republic of Vietnam”.


      And then the Yusovites (more precisely, their military intelligence with the help of "democratically minded officers") engaged in a periodic shift of the change of "legally elected" - the guys were very nasty.
      They exchanged as many as 5 pieces — whom they asked for good, someone for bad, and they no longer asked someone (Ngo Dinh Zyom).
      Bad - poor Assad was normally elected !!!
  4. +3
    4 March 2017 07: 48
    Also, the Russian police will carry out patrol functions, and fight against terrorists that are not completed by the Syrian army.


    how much does it take, our guys, to get everything done and done? Are there many people trying to "hang" on them?
  5. +7
    4 March 2017 08: 21
    And Syria will definitely not become the second Afghanistan for the Russian military? Indeed, at the beginning of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces, they said that only aviation would be used, which would quickly defeat ISIS, and the ground forces would not be needed at all, those who doubted were called the “fifth column” and “liberals”.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +2
      4 March 2017 11: 32
      Indeed, at the beginning of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces, they said

      Did not tellи, but one specific person spoke.
      But this man has already said a lot and promised. So do not take his words seriously.
      1. +2
        4 March 2017 12: 49
        Quote: Antarctica
        They didn’t speak, but one specific person spoke.
        .


        It was said by many, both military and civilian.
        Quote: Antarctica
        But this man has already said a lot and promised. So do not take his words seriously.


        Trumps and merkels with olands are taken seriously, and Antarctica is, of course, more abruptly. lol
  6. 0
    4 March 2017 08: 49
    Quote: Olgovich
    and "land" is a Syrian responsibility

    And raped "Palmyra -2".
  7. +5
    4 March 2017 09: 34
    Yes ... Now our contingent will be there. Let it be in the form of police. A dangerous game in which we get involved. The eagles have a lot of allies, including the United States, and a fart at any time can give another knife in the back. And I would like to believe that red takes only for parades. This is what a disguise it is!
  8. +2
    4 March 2017 09: 35
    I am not a patriot, but in principle I see nothing wrong with using partially in the rear of Syria the Russian police forces that would carry out a peacekeeping mission. Based on the events, Russia already partially fulfills peacekeeping functions there: only with the participation of the Russian Federation was it possible to peacefully "reconcile" a decent number of bandits, as well as liberate quite a few towns and villages or force them to go over to the side of the legitimate authorities. At the moment, there are not many countries in the world that have real experience of reconciliation with the disobedient territories. (probably not at all) But in the Russian Federation and in the USSR such experience was and, poorly, poorly, a heavy bloody massacre they managed to strangle. Perhaps the Russian - Soviet experience is not perfect, but it is necessary to use it and develop it too, correcting along the way the mistakes accumulated by ourselves in the past.
    1. +4
      4 March 2017 12: 51
      Quote: AwaZ
      I am not a patriot, but in principle I see nothing wrong with using partially in the rear of Syria the Russian police forces that would carry out a peacekeeping mission.


      Cleaning up the remaining terrorists is NOT a peacekeeping function, it is a full-fledged, very dangerous war.
      1. 0
        4 March 2017 14: 57
        Yes, it is unlikely that Russian troops will carry out full-scale sweeps. This is still the work of the Syrians themselves. but to maintain order is possible. Of course, it is impossible to exclude provocations against Russian soldiers, but the Syrians will nevertheless carry out full-scale actions against gangs who have settled in the "rear". Perhaps the Russian military will participate in this, but mainly in the role of "specialists." Whatever happens, but it’s not at all in our headquarters that they sit and understand the situation and soberly assess it.
  9. 0
    4 March 2017 10: 17
    Quote: 0255
    And Syria will definitely not become the second Afghanistan for the Russian military?

    --------------------------
    From Syria they want to make a second Crimea, as it seems to me. Establish your permanent control in the form of a military base in Latakia.
  10. 0
    4 March 2017 10: 27
    Quote: 0255
    And Syria will definitely not become the second Afghanistan for the Russian military? Indeed, at the beginning of the operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces, they said that only aviation would be used, which would quickly defeat ISIS, and the ground forces would not be needed at all, those who doubted were called the “fifth column” and “liberals”.

    Something I do not remember in the statement of the President or Shoigu about the rapid defeat of ISIS. Do not invent the rationale for your insecurity! If you do not provide a reliable rear, gang running will continue for another 10 years with varying success, and meanwhile the Russian Federation not only uses the airborne forces, but also trains and forms new combat-ready units of the SAA, which are pretty battered over the previous 5 years of the war with the bandits of Saudi and the USA ! soldier
  11. +3
    4 March 2017 10: 36
    Also, the Americans were drawn into the Vietnam War.
  12. +5
    4 March 2017 11: 23
    Another stupidity, if not worse, of our current leaders.
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      4 March 2017 17: 24
      Antarctica
      Since when did Chechens become Russians?

      From the very ones when the RF Constitution was adopted in 1993, the EMNIP. ALL the peoples of Russia, its inhabitants, Russian!
  14. +4
    4 March 2017 11: 57
    Still, slowly but surely, our soldiers are drawn into ground operations. And the pretext is plausible: the protection of our facilities. The thing will end with the fact that suicide bombers will regularly blow up not only Syrians or Iraqis, but also our guys. It will be so and, as they say, "do not go to the grandmother." We are waiting for two hundredth.
  15. 0
    4 March 2017 12: 27
    Quote: Samaritan
    Quote: Olgovich
    Also Russian the police will carry out patrol functions, and fight against the uninhabited terrorists of the Syrian army.

    In my opinion, this is the business of the Syrians themselves,
    VKS is normal and necessary, and “land” is Syrian responsibility.

    Already discussed, leaving them now is to spit on everything that has been done and get a new war in a year!
    Watch a video about our police in Syria, I think a lot of questions will be removed:
    [media = https: //youtu.be/7215V4t9VK4]
  16. +5
    4 March 2017 12: 33
    Quote: valerei
    Watch a video about our police in Syria, I think a lot of questions will be removed:
    [media = https: //youtu.be/7215V4t9VK4]

    That's right: - this video has removed a lot of questions, except for one: why is it completely forgotten what the Chechens did with the Russians in Chechnya in the early 90's? No one!! the Chechen at least would not apologize for the massacre of the Russian people that they committed. I do not believe the Chechens, it does not work out.
    1. 0
      5 March 2017 23: 01
      Quote: valerei
      No one!! the Chechen at least would not apologize for the massacre of the Russian people that they committed.

      Each crime has a first and last name.
  17. 0
    4 March 2017 15: 26
    How to distinguish an "unfinished terrorist" from other citizens of Syria? Or is it written on their forehead?
  18. +1
    4 March 2017 19: 03
    Personally, I’m not happy with this news,
    But if there are no other options yet,
    1. 0
      4 March 2017 19: 37
      support
  19. +2
    4 March 2017 19: 33
    Competent move, when Russian “Muslim” battalions are attracted to maintain order in the liberated territories, it should be understood that there is a civil war going on, and Assad’s allies are Iranians, Lebanese are also not white and fluffy, and largely due to religious troubles, and Russian Muslims they are related to those who have been rolled, they are trusted by the local people and they will support the necessary order without a doubt. Many more in Syria are ready to lay down their arms under specific Russian guarantees in the form of "Muslim" battalions of the Russian military police. Therefore, the Ingush battalion is also being sent not to replace the Chechens, but additionally, the Chechens still remain.
  20. 0
    5 March 2017 01: 12
    How much money, as if it is already a region of Russia. The Syrians themselves do not want to do anything, they no longer need this country.
  21. +3
    5 March 2017 05: 47
    In fact, this was to be expected. After the Syrians "went to ..." Palmyra, let "go ... to" Aleppo is too expensive and expensive. Unlike the export of "democracy", Russia positions the turnkey security export ". The game is worth the candle. In the literal sense, the crazy, faded Leopards and Abrams along the roads clearly illustrate the dullness and futility of the Western model of foreign policy.