Iranian machine Khaybar KH 2002

32
Among the new products from famous manufacturers weapons models of lesser known brands are often lost. Such weapons are rarely distinguished by something new and are usually created for domestic needs and small exports to other countries that cannot afford their own development and production. So in 2003, a machine from the Iranian manufacturer Defense Industries Organization was created and demonstrated to the public.

History create machine Khaybar KH 2002



The pedigree of the Iranian rifle KH 2002 is rather long and in its outlines one can hardly see the weapon with which everything began. Let's try to unleash the whole chain.

KH 2002 is a deep upgrade of the DIO S-5,56, which in turn is a copy of the Chinese CQ 5.56. Well, looking at the CQ 5.56, it’s not difficult to see that this is an American M16А1 with minor differences.

Looking at the weapons that the Iranian designers turned out to be, it’s really difficult to even assume that it all began with the M16A1.

It took only three years to develop a new machine gun, although there was no urgent need for a new weapon. But on the wave of interest in weapons in the configuration of the bullpup, this automatic machine, with its cheapness, could not only interest the military and the police, but also bring money from exports. However, the machine did not make much noise, although it interested many.

The design of the machine Khaybar KH 2002

The Iranian machine gun is made in the bullpup layout and has a number of drawbacks that are characteristic of weapons assembled in this form. The main disadvantage of the machine is that the window for ejection of spent cartridges cannot be transferred from the right to the left side of the weapon. That is, left handed users will not be comfortable using Khaybar KH 2002. These inconveniences will be caused not only by the sleeves flying in front of the face, but also by the fact that the switch of the fuse-translator of fire modes is located on the left side almost at the very back of the machine gun.

The weapon automatics is built according to the scheme of work with the removal of a part of the powder gases from the barrel bore, with their direct impact on the bolt group, that is, the completely analogous design М16А1.

An interesting solution was the creation of a large safety bracket, the entire length of the handle to hold. This allows the weapon to be used in a warm glove without any interference. In order to ensure the safety of the handling of weapons on the pistol grip there is a large automatic fuse button that blocks the trigger of the machine gun.
The bolt handle was placed under the rear pillar, which is also the handle for carrying the weapon. It is noteworthy that the cocking handle is rigidly connected with it and moves during firing, which means that with its help it will be possible to eliminate some delays in case of occurrence.

Iranian machine Khaybar KH 2002The trigger mechanism of the machine, as well as automation, is completely analogous to the M16А1, with the only exception that long thrust has been added to carry the pistol grip and the trigger forward in front of the weapon shop. USM allows you to fire as a single shot, and the queue. The ability to shoot with a cut-off of several rounds of the machine is missing.

Sights consist of a reversible diopter pillar and fly. Depending on the version of the weapon, the front sight is located either on one of the edges of the carrying handle, or on a separate stand.

In the front of the receiver, the machine has light bipods folding forward, although it would be more reasonable to try to add a seat for the under-barrel grenade launcher, on which, if necessary, the bipods could be installed.

Characteristics of the machine Khaybar KH 2002

Weapons produced in three versions, the main differences are in the length of the barrel, and accordingly the total length of the weapon and its mass. The basic version has a length of 780 millimeters and a mass of 3,7 kilograms. After it comes a slightly shorter version with a length of 730 millimeters and a mass of 3,6 kilograms. The most compact machine is also shorter on 50 millimeters and its weight is reduced by 100 grams. Weapon rate of fire is unchanged for all three options and is 850 shots per minute. The machine feeds from detachable stores with a capacity of 20 or 30 cartridges.

Pros and cons of the Iranian automaton

The main advantages of the weapon include not only its compact dimensions, but also the fact that it is made according to the already worked out scheme of automation, and therefore, with due quality of production, the machine will not have any obvious problems. The complete interchangeability of weapon parts makes repair easier, as there are plenty of various M16A1 options around the world.
The familiar scheme of automation will significantly simplify the process of weapons mastering by military personnel, although you still have to get used to the layout of the bullpup.

Interestingly, due to the “slimness” of the weapon, the Iranian Khaybar KH 2002 bayonet looks appropriate and can be used, since there is more than enough space for a convenient grip of the machine gun. Attached bayonet does not interfere with folding bipod.

The machine has more minuses than the manufacturer would have liked. Even if you close your eyes to the fact that the weapon has collected a full bouquet of the flaws of its layout, there are others besides them.

First of all, it should be noted that the balance is very strongly shifted back, which negates one of the advantages of the layout - the stable behavior of the barrel when maintaining automatic fire. There is even an opinion that the bipod on the arms is fixed just to level the balance, which does not quite help.

A lot of censures are caused by the cocking handle, perhaps this is the misfortune of only those weapons that were presented at the exhibition, but the handle dangled left and right, which is of course uncritical, but unpleasant. If the handle were slightly extended and inserted into the groove on the rear side of the rack, you could get rid of such a negative point.

In general, if you give any assessment to the Iranian machine, you can not fail to make a discount on the fact that this is just the third self-produced serial machine and the first machine developed independently, even if it is based on a well-known and well-established design. We can say that this is the result of the awareness of the fact that the weapons in the country should be their own so as not to depend on other countries. In any case, the foundation of its arms school in Iran has already been laid, and talented designers will always be there.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    7 March 2017 13: 24
    The main condition of the machine is reliability!
    Of course, there are a lot of minuses, rather, after all, an experimental model. In any case, the foundation of their weapons school in Iran has already been laid, and talented designers will always be found.
    1. +6
      7 March 2017 15: 00
      The Iranians are great, they don’t expect weather from the sea, but they themselves mumble little by little. Thanks to the author!
    2. 0
      9 March 2017 22: 51
      Quote: Samaritan
      The main condition of the machine is reliability!

      This is just one of the main requirements for any weapon. One of many.
      Quote: Samaritan
      In any case, the foundation of their weapons school in Iran has already been laid, and talented designers will always be found.

      I don’t know, not sure. In the USSR, somehow it was very tight. Although the Nagan rifle was redesigned about 100 years ago, like the Iranians of the M16 most recently.
      1. 0
        8 January 2018 18: 20
        Nagant’s rifle was remade 100 years ago

        what a subtle throw !!!! continue about the storm trooper ???
  2. +1
    7 March 2017 14: 19
    Freak, however.
    1. raf
      +3
      7 March 2017 22: 56
      Quote: Skubudu
      Freak, however.

      Yes, it’s not so scary, it’s even more terrible! However, in my opinion any bulpap is generally kak!
  3. avt
    +2
    7 March 2017 15: 36
    KH 2002 is a deep upgrade of the DIO S-5,56, which in turn is a copy of the Chinese CQ 5.56. Well, looking at the CQ 5.56, it’s not difficult to see that this is an American M16А1 with minor differences.
    Looking at the weapons that the Iranian designers turned out to be, it’s really difficult to even assume that it all began with the M16A1.
    ,, I blinded him from what was .... "Stupid business and no
    Quote: Samaritan
    , the foundation of his weapons school

    We would have taken and adjusted the A-91M license from the Tula, especially since there is a version for the NATO cartridge and now from this production base, we could have really developed a school with quite a series of weapons for our troops.
    1. +1
      7 March 2017 20: 17
      Quote: avt
      Would take and establish a license

      They want their own here and are now tormented by such a present - Fateh chambered for 5,56 mm

      In general, they demonstrate such a "variety" of riflemen produced in the country.
      1. +1
        9 March 2017 23: 00
        Quote: quilted jacket
        chambered for 5,56 mm

        Dig in the right direction. Unlike some of the "most advanced in the world."
    2. 0
      8 March 2017 22: 50
      Quote: avt
      Stupid business and no

      For some reason, European arms companies do not think so.
      Quote: avt
      Would take and establish a license A-91M from Tula

      This is truly a miracle judo that has never been verified anywhere.
    3. 0
      9 March 2017 22: 58
      Quote: avt
      They would take and establish the A-91M license from Tula, especially since there is a version for the NATO cartridge

      Something I did not notice anywhere in the lines of Russian small arms on NATO cartridges. Why wouldn’t you think about it?
      Quote: avt
      and already from this production base, we could really develop a school with getting quite a series of weapons in the troops.

      Yeah Nevertheless, read at least a little about small arms. About the schools. Etc. You need.
  4. +2
    7 March 2017 15: 36
    The M16 has a robust buffer device mounted in the butt. I wonder what the Iranians replaced him with, and how did this affect the operation of the mechanisms and the comfort of shooting?
  5. 0
    7 March 2017 18: 52
    In the second photo, the bayonet-knife is similar to 6x4 (AK)?
  6. +1
    7 March 2017 21: 40
    For Iran, it may work. But as for me, in the winter at -20t - a penny to him, a piece of iron ... which also clings to everything .. + bayonet-pornography - a knife. recourse
  7. 0
    7 March 2017 22: 09
    Well done, the Iranians that developed their assault rifle, laying the foundation for their weapons school.
    1. +1
      7 March 2017 22: 14
      Especially if you take the dead end branch M-16 as a basis. However, they know better there ..
  8. 0
    8 March 2017 16: 31
    without design traditions, good weapons will not work right away, then a school is needed.
    1. 0
      9 March 2017 23: 04
      Quote: core
      without design traditions, good weapons will not work right away, then a school is needed.

      Gold words. I would also add, "without age-old ...".
      There, the Chinese are tormented and amused by the whole honest world (in the field of small arms). Just like the USSR during its existence. And nothing has changed. What is the first, what is the second.
      1. 0
        12 March 2017 16: 32
        And who has this "centuries-old tradition" in the field of shooting design? Given that to design at least something, they began only in the middle of the 19th century, and even then in very places. Before that, everyone sculpted on what much and everyone was happy.
        1. 0
          12 March 2017 21: 58
          Quote: OQtagooi
          Given that to design at least something, they began only in the middle of the 19th century, and even then in very places.

          More than a century has passed since the mid-19th century. And more than 1,5 later.
          1. 0
            13 March 2017 07: 01
            It’s sophistry already gone, but you didn’t answer the question of who has this ancient weapons school.
            1. 0
              13 March 2017 11: 38
              Quote: OQtagooi
              who has such an ancient weapons school

              The Americans have.
              The Belgians have.
              The Germans have.
              This is so, offhand.
              1. 0
                14 March 2017 07: 16
                And, of course, only white people of the correct religion and Aryan appearance can have weapons schools with a centuries-old tradition. :) But if you discard the Nazi filter and look into the historical perspective, you get a slightly different picture. The Americans have two weapons schools with more than a century of tradition - Mexican and Tang. Moreover, in the Tan even Mexican developments were adopted. In the old world, in addition to the German and Belgian weapons schools that you mentioned, there are also Russian and Czech weapons schools. And of course, one should not forget about the English and Japanese weapons schools. Although the products of the islanders differed in some specificity, nevertheless, both island empires still produce small arms specifically of their own design. But again, I want to notice that all of the weapons schools listed above have been developing weapons for more than a hundred years, but not for centuries.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +1
                    16 March 2017 05: 54
                    Quote: F.NN

                    I do not know. According to my observations, so far only in the most developed countries in industrial and technological terms.

                    Neither Belgium nor the Czech Republic (Austria-Hungary) have ever been leaders in either technology or metallurgy, which there is nothing to be considered, however, the gun schools in small arms were there as they are.
                    Quote: OQtagooi
                    The Slavs were also Aryans, except for the Poles.

                    Do not read fairy tales about fellow travelers for the night, Dr. Goebels, of course, was the storyteller himself, but he certainly didn’t say that.
                    Quote: OQtagooi
                    So, they lost their school, in whole or in part. And not in connection with the origin, but in connection with "socialism."

                    Putin is to blame! 146% :) The Czechs, under socialism, also made very interesting models of shooting, but Ceska Zbrojovka didn’t go anywhere and feels great, no worse than Kalashnikov or Colt. CZ-806 BREN-2 is now released.
                    Quote: F.NN
                    I do not know anything about the Russian school of designing small arms.

                    If I have never been to Hawaii, then no Hawaii exists. :) Well, you don’t know, you don’t know, but if you don’t want to know, it’s only your troubles and they don’t affect the surrounding reality.
                    Quote: F.NN
                    Are you hinting at the Mondragon rifle? Something since then nothing particularly interesting from those edges is not visible. Although, maybe I'm just not in the know.

                    Mendoza light machine gun, FX-05 Xiuhcoatl assault rifle, which is now armed with the Mexican army, have not heard?
                  2. +2
                    23 October 2017 18: 28
                    According to my observations, so far only in the most developed countries in industrial and technological terms

                    what are you doing among the inferior ones ???? aaaa !!!! bring the light of knowledge ...
      2. +2
        23 October 2017 18: 27
        what subtle stuffing stuffs went on the fan .... and righteous anger is straight and rushing ... here and
        In the USSR, somehow it was very tight. Although Nagant’s rifle was remade 100 years ago, just as the Iranians M16 recently
        it's about the lack of talented weapons designers in the USSR / Russia ...
        Dig in the right direction. Unlike some of the "most advanced in the world"
        it's about 5,56 cartridge ...
        Something I did not notice anywhere in the line for Russian small arms on NATO cartridges
        I understand this about the fact that there is no sensible weapon in the Russian Federation ....
        Well, a masterpiece !!!!
        the Chinese are tormented and laugh the whole honest world (in the field of small arms). Just like the USSR during its existence

        tovarzch !!! and tovarzch .... ento not your famas recognized as the ugliest weapon in the world ???? and??? are not ento famas now being removed from service due to low reliability ???
  9. 0
    12 March 2017 16: 11
    The trigger mechanism of the machine, as well as automation, is completely similar to M16A1

    Yah. The M16A1 has Stoner automation, so there can be no movable shutter handles in it, and, as rightly noted above, the buffer with the return spring, which the M16A1 has in the butt, is also not observed here. So to M16A1 this machine, if it is related, is very distant.
  10. 0
    13 March 2017 11: 36
    Iran also decided to create a "fashionable Bupapov unit" - everyone sculpts and I can too.
    The main advantages of weapons include not only its compact size, but also the fact that it is made according to an already developed automation scheme, which means that with the proper quality of production, the machine will not have any obvious problems.

    This is just the most criticized part of the M16 (automation) - just for reliability.
    And as Yusovtsy are not eager to see such a scheme of automation in their perspective samples.
  11. 0
    25 March 2017 08: 35
    Quote: F.NN
    Quote: Samaritan
    The main condition of the machine is reliability!

    This is just one of the main requirements for any weapon. One of many.
    Quote: Samaritan
    In any case, the foundation of their weapons school in Iran has already been laid, and talented designers will always be found.

    I don’t know, not sure. In the USSR, somehow it was very tight. Although the Nagan rifle was redesigned about 100 years ago, like the Iranians of the M16 most recently.

    How interesting was it tight with talented designers in the USSR? Fedorov, Degtyarev, Tokarev, Shpagin, Sudaev, Makarov, Kalashnikov, Stechkin, Shipunov, Gryazev, can I forget someone? Are they copywriters? Yes, and Mosin. What is Nagan in the three-ruler? Yes, some parts of the design. Yes, in the West they say the Mosin-Nagan rifle. Also say that AK is a copy of the storm trooper created under the strict guidance of Herr Schmeisser.
  12. +1
    27 March 2017 10: 56
    Quote: vonWolfenstein
    maybe I forgot someone?

    Goryunov, Alexandrov, Korobov, Vladimirov. Machine guns - also shooting. :)
    1. +2
      23 October 2017 18: 29
      you need to start with Fedorov ....
    2. +2
      23 October 2017 18: 30
      oh-xx !!!! my extreme apologies ... did not make out in the post above ....