Will ionic engines occupy a dominant position in outer space?

9
Will ionic engines occupy a dominant position in outer space?

At the end of 2011, NASA announced plans to hold a competition to develop a concept for ion propulsion systems for spacecraft that will be powered by solar panels. A little later, the space agency entered into five contracts with companies that pledged for 600 thousand dollars to provide in four months the concept of "tug", which will be equipped with ion engines.

These companies include Ball Aerospace & Technologies, Analytical Mechanics Associates, Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Northrop Grumman. After they present their concepts, NASA will conduct an analysis of possible ways to overcome possible technical difficulties and a series of experiments to validate key technical solutions.



Ordinary rockets equipped with chemical engines that have been used for more than half a century can tear cargo off the Earth and take it into space. However, it is worth huge funds that hinders the conquest of space. On the contrary, ion engines, which have also been used for several decades, promise other perspectives. They have a relatively small burden, so they can not be used to put cargo into orbit. However, they have the ability to accelerate the products of combustion, which they emit, to enormous speeds, ten times higher than those that chemical RDs can achieve. Because of this, in order to create an impulse they need to throw away a lot less substance. Therefore, in open space, they are more economical than conventional rockets.

NASA plans to provide conventional carriers to take cargo to near-earth orbit, where a tug equipped with ion engines will take further transportation, bringing them to high orbits — geostationary or first Lagrange point. In the future, vehicles of this type can be used to send the ship into interplanetary space. And in orbits close to Earth, they can be engaged in towing commercial satellites that have come close to the atmosphere, thus increasing their lifespan.

So the space tug on solar batteries and with ion engines can look. (Image Boeing)


Such tugs can play a crucial role in the development of the solar system. Having reached the Lagrange point, gravity no longer acts on the ship, and the DRC can safely "pull" the vehicles into remote areas of space.

It is worth noting that one of the contest participants, Northrop Grumman, announced the start of work on the development of alternative power sources in addition to the existing solar panels. The new concept proposed by the company can scale these systems to power in 300 kW, which is an outstanding result.

Thus, the first results of collective “brainstorming” can be expected in the coming months. However, we can already note the key problems that developers will have to solve. The first is the dispersion of solar energy in space, which requires the creation of large-sized batteries. And in order to maintain the possibility of movement in the shadow of the Earth, the DSB will need additional batteries, which will further increase all the devices. This will naturally lead to restrictions on its ability to cheap and fast transportation of various goods. The conclusion of such a device using conventional rockets will be quite expensive. It is also problematic to use solar cells beyond the orbit of Mars, since the radiation intensity decreases.

Ion engines have been used in spacecraft for quite a long time in order to stabilize the orbit, to conduct small maneuvering. Many research probes, including Hayabus, even used them as marching. However, at the moment to use ionic engines powered by solar batteries for trucks is impractical. They simply do not have enough solar energy to create the required thrust.

By the way, this is exactly what made the USA and the USSR consider the possibilities of using nuclear reactors in spacecraft. The USSR collapsed, and the United States turned the project "Prometheus" in 2005 year due to financial difficulties. Naturally, the production of such ships is extremely undesirable, because any accident in the atmosphere will lead to the release of radioactive materials. NASA has relied on "solar" power, which means that American developers have to do a difficult job.
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    3 February 2012 09: 08
    It used to be in science fiction books and films, but now it is already a reality. Hmm, technology does not stand still.
  2. +5
    3 February 2012 11: 14
    Russia will create a nuclear engine for spacecraft

    RSC Energia Director Vitaly Lopota said that the first start-up of reactors with power from 150 to 500 kW could be carried out in 2020.
    The development of megawatt-class nuclear power systems for manned spacecraft is crucial to maintaining Russia's competitiveness in the space industry, including exploration of the moon and Mars. The project will require about 17 billion rubles. In addition, the corporation is working on the concept of an atomic space tug, which can more than halve the cost of putting goods into orbit.

    A nuclear reactor used as an energy source for an ion engine is capable of taking astronautics to a whole new level. The principle of operation of the engine is to ionize the gas and accelerate it with an electrostatic field to high speeds exceeding 210 km / s, which is much more than that of classical chemical rocket engines (3-4,5 km / s). Currently, ion engines are quite widely used on spacecraft. However, these are mainly low-power, low-thrust propulsion systems, since an ion engine requires a lot of electricity, measured in hundreds of kilowatt hours, and a nuclear reactor can also heat hydrogen to several thousand degrees and give great reactive thrust, without the need for an oxidizing agent.

    In any form, a cosmic nuclear reactor will be able to provide the spacecraft with the necessary energy, a burden, and provide a quick flight to the most remote corners of the solar system, where there is not enough sunlight to use solar batteries.

    http://www.exyavenue.com/novosti_vysokih_tehnologij/rossiya_sozdast_yadernyj_dvi
    gatelj_dlya_kosmolyotov
  3. snek
    0
    3 February 2012 12: 38
    "Will ion thrusters take the lead in outer space?" Well, so far they look very promising, especially in terms of interplanetary flights.
    1. Sergh
      0
      3 February 2012 15: 08
      On an ionic engine, amers back in the 90s sent space stations to Jupiter and Saturn (if I can dig, I’m reluctant), they flew safely and took pictures of the rings and natural satellites of both, dropped the probe into the atmosphere. There is even a documentary Discovery and National Geography.
      1. Zynaps
        0
        5 February 2012 00: 43
        fairy tales. more or less run-in technology of plasma electro-jet engines, and even how auxiliary. To ensure the long-term operation of the ion dvigla beyond the orbit of Mars, it will not require fuel cells or radioisotope (as before), but a full-fledged nuclear power plant. in which radiating excess heat panels can overlap the size of solar panels.
  4. 0
    3 February 2012 13: 52
    Question - M-70, M-100 modules manufactured by OKB Fakel - how many of them are produced per year now?
    In the 80s we made them somewhere around fifty a year and they went to satellites, the purpose of which is usually silent
  5. ICT
    0
    3 February 2012 17: 26
    Quote: Ascetic
    Russia will create a nuclear engine for spacecraft


    the program with the reactors will be closed for now, (in the sense that it is impossible to ensure 100% of no failures at startup), the Americans even had problems at the time simply with a radioactive power source when launching some satellite, then they turned a cool green
  6. dmitry98
    +1
    3 February 2012 18: 45
    "However, they have the ability to disperse combustion productswhich they throw away "
    fool
    The ion engine has NO combustion products, gas is used (inert, the lighter, the more MI). It is ionized and dispersed in an ESP.
    1. Zynaps
      0
      5 February 2012 00: 48
      gee. that’s the main problem of ion engines - where to get hold of heavy alkali metals, cesium or rubidium for them, at an affordable price. since in the ion engine we are not talking about more high-calorie rocket fuel, but only about the velocity of the outflow of particles, a larger UI will give just heavy elements. otherwise, accelerating the apparatus to the required speeds with light particles will take a tiring long time.
  7. 0
    11 January 2015 13: 25
    Well, let them fly to Mars on ion engines. The Americans really want to land on it, so let them fly. All progress for space exploration.