The Swedish army chose Mjölner self-propelled mortars

24
Some plans of the command of the Swedish army concerning the renewal of the self-propelled artillery fleet have become known. After the failure of previous projects of this kind, it was decided to purchase a new type of armored vehicles with artillery weapons. Such plans have already led to the signing of a contract with a contracting company that will perform the design and then master the serial production of a new sample. At the same time, however, at the moment some technical details of the promising project are not known for certain.

December 23, the procurement department of the Swedish military department Försvarets Materielverk and BAE Systems Corporation, announced the signing of a contract for the completion of the development and subsequent construction of serial armored vehicles for the benefit of the Swedish armed forces. According to the terms of the contract, at the beginning of 2019, BAE Systems will transfer to the customer the first new type of 40 machines ordered. Thanks to the implementation of the recently signed treaty, the Swedish army will be able to significantly renew the fleet of self-propelled mortars, without resorting to unacceptably high costs.



The Swedish army chose Mjölner self-propelled mortars
The only official image of the self-propelled mortar BAE Mjölner


A promising self-propelled mortar for Sweden was named Mjölner ("Mjölnir" - the hammer of the Scandinavian Thunder god of Thunder). As part of the Swedish army, this technique will be operated under the official designation Granatkastarpansarbandvagn 90120 (Grkpbv 90120). The cost of the recently signed contract is 575 million Swedish kronor - about 68 million US dollars. Thus, the price of one mortar was determined in 14,4 million crowns or 1,7 million dollars.

The recently signed contract was the result of a competition held over the past few years. The Mjölner machine, the modified AMOS self-propelled mortar, the Finnish Patria NEMO system (a simplified single-barreled AMOS version), and the 120-mm mortar installation project in the CV 90 armored vehicle compartment with a large sunroof. Based on the results of a study of the four proposals, the army chose the Mjölner project. The proposed architecture of the machine allows to obtain quite high performance with relatively simple design.

As part of the fulfillment of the signed contract, the Swedish side and BAE Systems Corp. should organize a joint venture HB Utveckling AB, which is a subsidiary of BAE Systems Bofors AB and BAE Systems Hägglunds AB. The main task of the joint venture will be the installation of new equipment and weapons on existing tracked chassis. Thus, the new project Mjölner provides for the maximum possible localization of production.

The order of BAE Mjölner self-propelled mortars can put an end to the lingering stories with the selection and purchase of equipment of similar purpose. The program to create a promising self-propelled mortar with enhanced characteristics, designed for the Swedish army, was launched in the mid-nineties. Then the company BAE Systems Hägglunds together with the Finnish Patria began work on the AMOS project. A prospective mortar was supposed to have a number of characteristic features, but the fine-tuning of this system was seriously delayed. As a result, mass production was limited to the release of 18 gun turrets for the Finnish army and several experimental products for Sweden.

Initially, it was assumed that Sweden would acquire 40 self-propelled mortar AMOS on the crawler CV 90. Nevertheless, difficulties with the project implementation have led to the fact that in 2009, they refused from such plans. Built chassis, and not equipped with towers with weapons, were sent for storage. At the same time, however, the need to purchase self-propelled mortars did not disappear, which is why later several new projects were launched, including Mjölnir. In the medium term, this project should lead to the beginning of the re-artillery units.

At the moment, the developer has announced some information about the technical appearance of a promising self-propelled mortar. At the same time, much of the data is not disclosed. In addition, some of the previously published data may contradict each other. In such conditions, the exact determination of the appearance of a new combat vehicle is not an easy task. Interestingly, some of the data available on the Mjölner system suggests the use of ideas previously proposed for use in the AMOS project.

At the moment, we can only speak with confidence about the type of chassis offered for use as a base for a self-propelled mortar. Mjölner mortars will be built on the basis of a modified CV 90 tracked infantry fighting vehicle chassis, created by BAE Systems in the early nineties. Four dozen such machines in the past were built to implement the AMOS program, but the abandonment of this project left the equipment out of business. Now remaining in storage chassis is planned to be used in a new project.


Previously published versions of the layout of promising armored vehicles


The CV 90 or Stridsfordon 90 is a tracked infantry fighting vehicle with a combat mass up to 25 T. The machine is built according to the standard layout for such equipment with a front engine compartment and aft landing compartment. Diesel engines with power up to 810 hp are used, depending on the modification. The hull of the machine is able to protect the crew from various threats, up to the shells of 30-mm automatic guns. BMP for the Swedish army were equipped with turrets with 40-mm automatic guns. Export equipment carries 30- and 35-mm guns.

The draft AMOS proposed to deprive the existing standard chassis of the tower and the troop compartment. On the roof of the hull it was proposed to mount a swiveling tower with a double-barreled mortar. In this connection, the central and aft compartments of the corps were assigned to the combat compartment and the laying of ammunition. In the new project BAE Mjölner, as follows from the available data, a similar layout will be used. Probably, the geometric and layout features of the combat module of a new type were determined in accordance with the parameters of the previous project, thanks to which the Mjölnir towers could be mounted on the already built chassis.

Earlier, BAE Systems published several images of a promising self-propelled mortar. At the same time, while we are talking only about diagrams and drawings. A full-fledged prototype of the Mjölner machine has not yet been built, which is why the manufacturer simply cannot provide photos of it.

On the existing figures and diagrams depicts a tracked chassis combat vehicle equipped with a large turret or wheelhouse. The tower may have a sloping frontal part, as well as a large central and aft compartment. In the frontal part of the tower / felling should be a gun mount. Aft niche can be used to place stacking ammunition. The free volumes of the fighting compartment are allocated to accommodate the crew. Available data suggest that mortar is not supposed to seat, and they will have to work while standing. Such features of the ergonomics of the fighting compartment are directly related to the unusual approach used in creating weapons and auxiliary systems.

One of the main problems of the previous AMOS project was the unacceptable complexity of the design of the artillery system and their means of control. Because of this, the terms of reference for the Mjölner project provides for the greatest possible simplification of all the main elements of the fighting compartment. So, it is proposed to use hand drives to rotate the turret and vertical guidance of the gun mount. Mortar recharging is also offered manually. Finally, the proposed use of some simplified fire control system. What exactly is its simplification, however, is not specified.

The desire of the customer to simplify the design of the combat vehicle led to the emergence of original ideas and unusual equipment. The main weapon of the Mjolnir machine must be twin mortars of the caliber 120 mm. It is proposed to install two such tools side by side on common brackets and equip them with combined recoil devices. Weapon mounting tools must be equipped with manual vertical drive drives. The muzzle of the barrels, which goes beyond the combat compartment, can be covered with a large casing of a characteristic angular shape, the task of which is to protect the weapon itself and its additional units.

Contrary to the obvious ideas and solutions, in the project BAE Mjölner it is proposed to use the muzzle loading of mortars. To do this, both guns must be equipped with special means of supplying ammunition to the muzzle of the barrels. Thus, the crew’s task will be to carry the mine from laying onto a tray or a movable element of the loading system, which will then feed the shot into the barrel. How exactly this technique will be implemented and how the loading drives will be is not yet specified.

It should be noted that similar loading systems were studied by Swedish experts in the mid-nineties, in the early stages of the AMOS project. Then, in order to carry out the tests, a pilot plant was assembled with two muzzle loaders and mines. Above the trunks were placed two long guides in the form of trays, on the sides of them - rotary axes with cylindrical devices for transporting ammunition. Most of the elements of such a system had hand drives. The principle of operation of the systems was quite simple. Mina was asked to be laid on the tray, after which the corresponding mechanism gave it forward and took it outside the fighting compartment, where it fell from the tray into the cylinder. Then the rotation of the axis moved the cylinder with a mine to the barrel, after which the ammunition under its own weight fell into the gun.


Experimental twin mortar installation with a muzzle loading system


In the full-fledged AMOS project, it was decided to use only mechanized and automated systems, while the manual ones were not of interest to the customer. Nevertheless, in the course of testing and refinement, certain problems of automation were identified, which ultimately was one of the reasons for rejecting such equipment. Given this experience, respectively, the new Mjölner self-propelled mortar should have the maximum possible number of systems with manual control.

In 2019, a joint venture between two Swedish offices of BAE Systems should transfer the first self-propelled mortar of the 40 required to the customer. As part of serial construction, only towers with weapons and some other devices will be manufactured from scratch. They are planned to be mounted on existing tracked chassis, which are the “legacy” of the unsuccessful AMOS project. All this equipment is available and is currently in storage.

Mjölner / Grkpbv 90120 self-propelled mortars are planned to be reduced to batteries of eight cars each. One such unit will be present as part of five heavy maneuverable motorized infantry battalions. Operation of such equipment will begin after the implementation of current plans for reforming the structure of the army. The deadlines for the completion of deliveries of four dozen self-propelled mortars have not yet been specified. Apparently, the supply of equipment will end no earlier than the middle of the next decade.

Currently, the Swedish army does not have self-propelled mortar caliber 120 mm, continuing the operation of relatively numerous towed systems. In the mid-nineties, an attempt was made to create the required technology with high performance, but for almost a decade and a half of work it did not lead to the desired result. As a result, the army was forced to abandon the AMOS project and later issue updated technical requirements, revised to simplify.

Recently, the Swedish army completed an analysis of four proposals, the results of which selected equipment for future purchases. Over the next few years, BAE Systems Corporation and its structural divisions will have to complete the development of the project, and then prepare for the mass production of Mjölner mortars. The first cars of the new type will be handed over to the customer at the end of the current decade.


On the materials of the sites:
http://baesystems.com/
http://fmv.se/
http://defence.pk/
http://cornucopia.cornubot.se/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    28 December 2016 05: 40
    Available data suggest that the mortars are not put in place, and they will have to work standing up.
    Well, where is the union looking? If only they bought stools from "Ikea" ...
    For this, both guns should be equipped with special means of supplying ammunition to the muzzle of the barrels. Thus, the crew’s task will be to carry mines from laying on a tray or a moving element of the loading system, which will then supply the shot to the barrel. How exactly this technique will be implemented and what the loading drives will be is not yet specified.
    The Swedes in our repertoire - we will make the complex even more difficult ...
    1. +6
      28 December 2016 11: 47
      Quote: svp67
      The Swedes in our repertoire - we will make the complex even more difficult ...

      On the contrary, it will be a simplification.
      First, conventional mines can be used, not special ones.
      Secondly, it is not necessary to bring the package of trunks to the positions for loading
      Thirdly, the conditions of the loader’s work will improve, in the aft niche of the tower it will be possible to install a non-mechanized warhead instead of a complex automated one, which, accordingly, will be much more voluminous
      Fourthly, it is possible to abandon two breeches with two rather complicated barrel locking systems.
      Fifth, two ejectors can be dispensed with to remove powder gases from the bore

      ===========
      But there are also disadvantages to this solution. Small elevation angles will become unavailable. The trunks are shorter, which means less maximum range.

      Well, the impossibility of cooling the trunks. At NEMO, it seems like the barrel was cooled with water injection to increase the rate of fire. On the other hand, if you throw a mine into overheated barrels in the muzzle-loading version, then nothing really bad will happen. When the mines move along the bore, the beams will ignite, and it will simply spit out with decreasing range. "Ouch" will happen in the breech-loading one with sad consequences for the crew

      The only thing is that I can't even imagine how to carry out an "abortion" on such a system. Looks like they think that they will not have misfires when fired by default.
      1. +1
        28 December 2016 11: 52
        Quote: Spade
        The only thing is that I can't even imagine how to carry out an "abortion" on such a system

        easy...
        Quote: Spade
        On the contrary, it will be a simplification.

        I don’t understand two points
        - how do mines still fall into the trunk
        - what is the protection against double loading
        1. +1
          28 December 2016 12: 40
          Quote: svp67
          - how do mines still fall into the trunk

          From the tray, the mine rises to the cutoff level of the barrel, the coordinator displays it on the loading line and throws it. In principle, nothing particularly complicated.

          Quote: svp67
          what is dual charge protection

          Electronics or mechanics. The prohibition on the operation of the loading system has so far "come in but not out". There is nothing particularly complicated.
          1. 0
            28 December 2016 12: 45
            Quote: Spade
            From the tray, the mine rises to the cutoff level of the barrel, the coordinator displays it on the loading line and throws it.

            That is, for some time, BOTH of the barrel can not shoot or are they mismatched?
            Q It turns out that the mines at this moment are subject to external influences? Does it mean that she cannot shoot in motion?
            1. +2
              28 December 2016 13: 23
              Quote: svp67
              That is, for some time, BOTH of the barrel can not shoot or are they mismatched?

              In the sense of? They do not shoot at "prick". We threw two mines into two barrels, all the loading systems on the original ones, then the shots.

              Quote: svp67
              Q It turns out that the mines at this moment are subject to external influences?

              Watching how they do the coordinator. You can book it.

              Quote: svp67
              Does it mean that she cannot shoot in motion?

              Not a single self-propelled mortar shoots in motion. This requires a stabilizer, and this is a complication.
              1. 0
                28 December 2016 20: 55
                Quote: Spade
                In the sense of? They do not shoot at "prick". We threw two mines into two barrels, all the loading systems on the original ones, then the shots.

                Basically you answered. That is, at the time of loading, they are unarmed. It would still be possible to mismatch loading and aiming trunks, then it would be possible to conduct more intense fire.
                1. 0
                  28 December 2016 21: 09
                  Yes, they fool around foolishly. The problem of high rate of mortar can be solved without two barrels.
      2. +5
        28 December 2016 13: 41
        Quote: Spade
        The only thing is that I can't even imagine how to carry out an "abortion" on such a system

        The coup of the whole car. smile Or pull out through the barrel with a long rod, fastened through the transition head to the head of the mine (thread, bayonet mount, etc.).

        It is strange that the Swedes did not realize their favorite option, firmly fixing the trunks and arranging guidance with the whole body using the suspension. wink
        1. +1
          28 December 2016 17: 43
          Quote: Alexey RA
          It is strange that the Swedes did not realize their favorite option, firmly fixing the trunks and arranging guidance with the whole body using the suspension.

          Could ...
          Even now they are trying to advance along a "special path" without making decisions that have been worked out for a long time.
  2. 0
    28 December 2016 06: 46
    But 2 trunks! IKEA in action. It is clear that this is not a Direct Fighting Machine, but excluding the possibility of not even a direct hit, but a cover, their trays will not lead to the side? on the other hand, it was probably this scheme that made it possible to build a 2-barrel mortar, which in principle would probably increase the accuracy of fire and its speed.
    1. +2
      28 December 2016 07: 00
      Quote: Aasdem
      But 2's trunk!

      I wonder how all this will work in practice. If salvo firing from two barrels at once, how will the gunpowder gases of the barrels affect the mine from an adjacent barrel? And if shooting in turn, how is the problem with the rollback force asymmetric with respect to the center of mass solved?
    2. +1
      28 December 2016 08: 14
      Well, you can see how AMOS works. Direct fire and even on board and even with wheeled armored personnel carriers are possible, there is a video of such shooting. Probably after loading, you can aim guns.
  3. +1
    28 December 2016 10: 42
    Self-propelled mortar with loading outside the reserved volume? Hello, new Churchill AVRE. smile

    Or did the Swedes get their Kurchevsky? what
  4. +1
    28 December 2016 11: 11
    I thought that everything was normal with AMOS, so they praised him, but it turned out they didn’t even take them into service
  5. +2
    28 December 2016 11: 21
    The Swedes have their own path, winding - like Loki’s thoughts.
    1. +3
      28 December 2016 11: 28
      Yeah. And if you consider that Mjellnir returned to the owner after the throw, then how will it look in the modern version? what
  6. +3
    28 December 2016 11: 27
    Well ... at AMOS, everything was by no means as curly as it seems.
    Firstly, a mortar breech-loading mortar, and therefore required a special mine with a sump for obturation. It seems that the muzzle-loading variant will solve this problem.
    As well as the problem of the need to output the package of trunks to the position for loading. Of which two. Loading from two conveyors in the aft recess of the tower and manually loading from a non-mechanized stacking in the stern of the machine body ...

    Secondly, there has never been a fully automatic loading. It was necessary to remove unnecessary beams of charge manually, and with "automatic" loading from the aft niche of the tower, apparently the commander.
    In addition, most of the mines of the ammunition were located in a non-mechanized warhead in the car body

    And loading from it required the loader to work in a very uncomfortable position with the letter "siu"
    1. 0
      28 December 2016 13: 49
      And how does the breech-loading cornflower shoot with conventional mines? And in fact, bursts (like about 120 rounds per minute)? How is the issue of obturation resolved in it? By the way, and the ammunition with the finished rifled Swedes apparently will not be able to shoot ....
      How many mines can a Swedish doublet issue before changing positions, in the case of an adequate opponent?
      1. +2
        28 December 2016 17: 12
        Quote: demiurg
        And how does the breech-loading cornflower shoot with conventional mines?

        Everything is much more complicated there. The "Vasilka" has a massive piston bolt, which moves forward during a shot, and the powder gases need to do a lot of work to stop it and throw it back. Plus there is an obturation ring.

        Quote: demiurg
        And in fact, bursts (like about 120 rounds per minute)?

        As I recall, 60 rounds per minute with barrel cooling, 40 without cooling. Otherwise it will be byaka ...
        1. 0
          30 December 2016 13: 07
          Quote: Spade
          As I recall, 60 rounds per minute with barrel cooling, 40 without cooling. Otherwise it will be byaka ...

          In general, the practical rate of fire at Vasilka is 100-120 v / m, and the technical rate of fire is 170. In combat conditions, it is really in the region of 60.
          1. +1
            30 December 2016 13: 24
            Quote: avdkrd
            in general, the practical rate of fire at Cornflower is 100-120 v / m, and the technical 170

            Technical AK-74 sort of like 600 rounds per minute? What happens if I try to shoot 600 rounds in a minute?

            In artillery there is such a thing as a fire regime. In a minute, 40 minutes can be released from those modernized mortars that still remain in the troops in some places, or 60 from the old non-modernized water-cooled mortars.
            And as far as I remember, these numbers are in TO and IE. That is, the developers do not guarantee the adequate operation of the mortar when exceeding this pace.
  7. 0
    28 December 2016 17: 30
    What the hell is that pig! laughing and they called it so formidably Mjolnir, the hammer of Thor, probably also firing on gas, shoots.
  8. +4
    7 June 2017 12: 52
    An interesting thing is a quick-fire mortar.
    Put on something like the T-90, supplement the 30-mm cannon and a pair of machine guns with remote control, plus add all sorts of goodies for active and passive defense and voila - a “wunderwaffle” for urban battles.