Conquerors of water and air: "miracle" -screens of Rostislav Alekseev

63
Conquerors of water and air: "miracle" -screens of Rostislav Alekseev

Ekranoplan "Lun"

100 years ago in the city of Novozybkov (now the Bryansk region) was born a man who was destined to create one of the most amazing cars on Earth - WIG, combining the features of an airplane and a ship.



Rostislav Evgenievich Alekseev was born in 1916 year in the family of an agronomist and teacher. In 1933, the Alekseevs family moved to Gorky, where Rostislav went to study at the Gorky evening work school, while at the same time working as a draftsman and artist. In the same years he began to practice sailing.

Alekseev became interested in the idea of ​​increasing speed on the water during his studies at the transport and engineering department of the Gorky Industrial (Polytechnic) Institute named after Zhdanov. Rostislav Evgenievich came to the Krasnoe Sormovo plant with his diploma project. During the Great Patriotic War, he began work at the factory in the Quality Control Department for acceptance tanks T-34. Out of hours, he tests the first hydrofoil model. In 1943, the launch of the first hydrofoil boat took place.

Subsequently, for the creation of the first domestic torpedo boats on hydrofoils, Alekseev and a group of his associates who were directly involved in the work, in 1951, the Stalin Prize was awarded.

From 1952, a Research Experimental Hydrodynamic Laboratory was established on the basis of a hydrodynamic laboratory and an experimental tank workshop, which subsequently grew into the Central Design Bureau for hydrofoil vessels.

Since 1960, the Central Design Bureau has been developing ekranoplan designs. In total, about 40 projects of these ships were developed, more than 30 units of various purposes were built. The transition from hydrofoil to air wings made it possible to remove restrictions on the speed of ships and bring it closer to aviation.

WHAT IS SCREENPLAN

The ekranoplan is an apparatus that uses the so-called screen effect, which consists in the property of a wing moving near the surface of the sea or even land, to increase lift and reduce drag. The effect is greater, the smaller the distance of the wing from the surface.

Ekranoplans have airspeed of movement, but do not require airfields, have a large carrying capacity, can be operated over any relatively flat surface. On seaworthiness restrictions for ekranoplans exist only during takeoff and landing.

The winged surface effect vehicle (as opposed to an airplane) has a special profile and shape, maximally adapted for the effective use of the incident flow, which is compressed between the wing and the surface ("screen").

Large ekranoplans, equipped with engine jetting under the wing, have seaworthiness on take-off and landing up to 5 points, and in flight their seaworthiness is practically unlimited. This ensures a high regularity of movement of an airplane.

Sea ekranoplan has much more safety in flight than airplanes, because the airfield is always under it, and even the simultaneous failure of all engines allows it to perform a safe landing on the water. The ekranoplan can fly over shallow water, which is not available to high-speed vessels.

The speed and controllability of ground effect vehicles, as well as the ability to quickly increase the flight altitude, allow you to safely disperse from ships and other obstacles.

FAMOUS "MOON" AND "Eaglet"


Ekranoplan "Lun"

In 1966, the first experimental full-scale naval warship "Ship-mock-up" (KM) with ten aircraft turbojet engines was created.

The pilot sea transport assault landing vehicle Eaglet (C-21, laid in 1970 year) built at the Volga plant in 1973 made the first test output in the technological configuration on the Volga River.

In 1982, a group of two marine transport and landing craft "Orlyonok" during the exercises on the Caspian Sea demonstrated unprecedented speed and secrecy, delivering marines from Baku to Krasnovodsk and returning in just three hours. The division of these ekranoplanes was part of the Red Banner Caspian flotilla.

In 1989, after the shooting, the first in stories world technology experienced shock ekranoplan-rocket carrier "Lun".
In 1992-m, the project of an experienced search and rescue WIG model "Rescuer" was created and approved on the basis of the material part of the second built model of an WLG.

Ekranoplan "Lun"

The take-off weight is up to 400 tons, the flight speed is up to 550 km / h, the capacity is 150 – 500 people, the hospital-medical complex is unprecedented for aircraft in scale.

Analogs to the previously created ekranoplans with similar characteristics of take-off weight, speed indicators and seaworthiness do not exist.
Today TsKB on hydrofoil vessels to them. R.E. Alekseeva leads the development of a number of ekranoplan projects for various application areas, with different take-off mass and a range of speed characteristics. EKP projects can be used for the transportation of passengers, urgent cargo delivery, as well as for solving the problems of the Ministry of Emergency Situations.

The ekranoplan in contrast to the aircraft does not imply a change in pressure associated with a change in altitude, as well as "air holes" and "bumpiness."
EKP designs are more technological than planes, which gives a slightly lower cost. Infrastructure for maintenance and safety of ekranoplans is less costly. Ekranoplans can take off from the water at a considerable distance from the coast, which means that they can produce less noise in the city than airplanes and move from the port in the "small gas" mode. The parameters of the exhaust gases of engines comply with the requirements of international standards and, compared with aircraft, are neutralized faster by the surface of the sea.

Operation of WIG is possible in all climatic zones. Most advantageous is their use in the south. Ekranoplans are particularly effective, ranging from 600 – 800 tons of carrying capacity. Depending on the setting of tasks, a ground-drive vehicle may have a minimum crew size. An amphibious landing vehicle can transport up to 50% of take-off weight.

The flight range of the ground effect vehicle is commensurate with the performance of aviation technology. For a water based ekranoplan, a pontoon dock is needed, the rest of the equipment is required the same as for aircraft. For training pilots accumulated the necessary base. Learning how to control ground effect vehicles will be easier for pilots with experience in managing seaplanes.

CIVIL PROJECTS


Ship-ekranoplan "Ship-layout"

At the moment, experts are working on the creation of projects of high-speed boats of the new generation "Sagaris", "Tourmalin", "Goldfinger". The exterior of these ships has a futuristic design, according to the CDB.

The Central Design Bureau for the SEC in the territory of its own research and production complex is building a prototype hydrofoil vessel (SEC) "Valdai 45Р". The prototypes of this vessel are the SEC "Belarus" and "Polesie".

The Vimpel plant is building the leading hydrofoil ship Comet 120M. A great experience has been gained in creating ships and boats with an air cavity on the bottom with a displacement from 100 to 400 tons and speeds from 30 to 60 nodes: a speedboat Serna, a landing craft Dugong, patrol boats Mercury and Sokhoi, a passenger boat ship "Linda".

One of the new developments is the high-speed expedition ship KVK 1200. The ship is able to solve a whole range of tasks: implementation of research and development, geological exploration, environmental monitoring; transportation of fuel and energy complex; the implementation of freight transport; participation in rescue operations. On the basis of the KVK 1200 platform, the concept of an "intelligent ship" was implemented, providing a high level of management efficiency. The command complex is concentrated in one place and allows for constant monitoring of all life support systems of the ship and the state of the crew.

Rostislav Alekseev’s design ideas were ahead of time by decades. We can say that the word "ekranoplan", which is commonly spoken in Russian all over the world, has come down from the light hand of the ingenious designer.

It was under the leadership of Alekseev that the ships for the transport of goods and passengers on rivers and seas managed to reach speeds of 200, 300 and even 500 km / h. High-speed vessels of the Central Design Bureau for SEC are recognized by classification societies of the USA, Italy, France and other shipbuilding powers.
The ships designed under Alekseev were operated not only in the USSR, but also were exported to Italy, Greece, Cuba, Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary and other countries.
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    25 December 2016 15: 24
    this is the technique I understand!
    1. Cat
      +2
      25 December 2016 15: 50
      The main expediency!
      To operate ekranoplanes, it is necessary to create an infrastructure, train pilots and, most importantly, "give birth" to a car!
      1. +9
        25 December 2016 16: 11
        In reality, a whole bunch of technical problems have not been solved there, everything seems to be fine, but what about the efficiency of the engines? there is not a word about them in the article, or at what excitement is he able to move safely? I read that during tests 1 literally crumbled from vibration and the crew died.
        1. Cat
          +5
          25 December 2016 17: 21
          In principle, "vibration" and the death of the "first" Eaglet are childhood diseases! Which for lunch is already 35-40 years old.
          WIG concept is interesting! But for its development it is necessary to determine why it is needed!
          Rescue ship!
          Missile carrier!
          Landing platform!
          Or something different.
          If an order is needed programmatically, a concept and money! My personal conviction must start small!
          1. +8
            25 December 2016 23: 00
            The trouble with ekranoplanes is that they are generally not particularly needed. Everywhere they have a less adequate replacement. And if there is a niche, then it is so narrow that it does not allow this type of machine to get out of the exotic area.
        2. +3
          25 December 2016 19: 23
          Quote: tilovaykrisa
          In reality, a whole bunch of technical problems have not been solved there, everything seems to be fine, but what about the efficiency of the engines? there is not a word about them in the article, or at what excitement is he able to move safely? I read that during tests 1 literally crumbled from vibration and the crew died.

          It is at the junction of all problems.According to current technologies, many problems can and must be solved, for example, composites will remove the problem of corrosion and weight, new engines - economy, new radar and communication technologies - excess weight of electronics, and then only advantages will remain - it is simply impossible kill, he always calmly sits on the water, even without motors at all !! The platform is massive enough and, due to the economy of the above, can accept a small air defense system of the armor type, this will solve the local problem of protection from fighters, or / and the Khibiny class protection system -fortunately, the size and energy allow. wink
          1. +1
            26 December 2016 04: 46
            new engines, new materials, light rockets will go on airplanes - and you don’t even want to think about it fool
            EP will catch 2-4 fuel-efficient engines? And the plane on one will take twice as much cargo and rush it over any terrain twice as fast and three times further! Where is the savings negative
          2. 0
            26 December 2016 20: 58
            The shell is not needed there. With such speeds it is necessary to put aviation all-angle missiles. Radars also put aviation.
            It should also be noted that ekranoplanes were built according to the residual principle. Therefore, they received neither normal metal nor engines.
            Therefore, there was an excess weight.
          3. +1
            7 January 2017 01: 16
            The crash of the CM in the Caspian Sea showed how the ekranoplan "quietly sits down" without motors. He fell apart in half and that's the end of it. And people died. It turned out very calmly.
          4. 0
            30 October 2017 11: 34
            here it is "junction of all problems" kills everything ...
            If it were so beautiful, do you think the United States wouldn’t make them ??? They have long ago calculated everything and probably came to the conclusion that this device is absolutely inexpedient
            That's why its nowhere and they don’t build - in spite of all its charms ...
  2. +10
    25 December 2016 15: 31
    I have a feeling that the articles are being reprinted from each other, with minor changes. there was an article about Alekseev and his technique at VO, by the way, maybe a month or two ago. And mine was all the same.
    And about the ekranoplanes every week, about their necessity and uselessness.
    Same. Creative crisis?
    1. Cat
      +4
      25 December 2016 16: 09
      This topic "excites" readers and authors of VO!
      Moreover, I consider it reasonable, where we were in parity, now we are losing ground. All this is sad ......
      So we spill everything onto the pages of VO.
      Let's hope that the breakthrough in the development of ekranoplanes is just around the corner.
      1. +3
        25 December 2016 16: 28
        When the topic excites, they turn on the head, worry about the topic trying to prove, such as Kaptsov or Andrei from Chelyabinsk, and here's a dumb reprint of the text. starts to bother. yes and comments of such a plan: we must work in this direction.
    2. 0
      26 December 2016 12: 28
      no, not a creative crisis, you just need more articles, then there will be more clicks and downloads, and from here and advertising revenue ... his mother woke ...
  3. +4
    25 December 2016 15: 38
    It is necessary to continue work in this direction.
    1. +4
      25 December 2016 15: 59
      Quote: Darth Revan
      It is necessary to continue work in this direction.

      First you need a clear and understandable concept of using these platforms. As well as understanding on which TVD such platforms can effectively show themselves.
      1. +2
        25 December 2016 16: 12
        in the USSR they planned to use them against aug, I do not think that the Navy has changed its mind about them.
      2. +3
        25 December 2016 17: 59
        Quote: NEXUS
        need a clear and understandable concept for using these platforms. As well as understanding on which TVD such platforms can effectively show themselves.

        As an option, cargo-passenger communication between the mainland and the islands of the Kuril ridge. Including in terms of supplying military bases. In the event of hostilities, their use as an amphibious assault.
        1. +1
          27 December 2016 09: 34
          Quote: man in the street
          As an option, cargo-passenger communication between the mainland and the islands of the Kuril ridge.

          For freight

          For transportation of passengers
  4. +5
    25 December 2016 16: 31
    Quote: Kostya Andrei
    I have a feeling that the articles are being reprinted from each other, with minor changes. there was an article about Alekseev and his technique at VO, by the way, maybe a month or two ago. And mine was all the same.
    And about the ekranoplanes every week, about their necessity and uselessness.
    Same. Creative crisis?

    Looks like. This is the third topic on one page of the "Armament" section. And during this day

    Quote: tilovaykrisa
    in the USSR they planned to use them against aug, I do not think that the Navy has changed its mind about them.

    These Wishlist had nothing to do with the real situation. You may want to shoot down American planes from near Moscow on the American continent, but there are no ways to do this yet. The same with EP. Moreover, the military did not want this, because the electronic agents were not in demand by them ...
  5. +4
    25 December 2016 18: 04
    Well, how much is already possible.
    Make an article about Alekseev’s PDA. Hundreds of ships built. But why drag in his mistake? Yes, even to attribute some machinations of unknown enemies ...
    No need to wishful thinking. The CCP lives like hovercraft. We experimented with ekranoplans, and abandoned this rotten business. Nobody needed them. Neither here nor abroad. Even in China.
    Humanity is constantly checking something, discarding unnecessary, this is normal.
  6. +1
    25 December 2016 19: 01
    For the transfer of troops along sea and northern wounds through ice-covered oceans. Northern Territory, Far East. Taxi between the Kuril Islands.
  7. +1
    25 December 2016 19: 23
    Yes ... really a miracle ... We would develop further ... in this area would be ahead of the rest ...
    1. +1
      25 December 2016 20: 38
      Quote: parusnik
      Would develop further ... in this area would be ahead of the rest ...

      This is the only goal - "to be ahead of the rest." What about common sense? request
  8. +13
    25 December 2016 19: 33
    To once again smile put an end to the subject of ekranoplanes, I propose to read the article from the site Russian Top.
    With all due respect to Alekseev, Lippis and Bartini, constantly flying in the takeoff mode is bad, damn uneconomical and deadly. Altitude is very useful for the aircraft, the health of its crew and passengers. All the benefits of the screen effect (increase in lift when flying a few meters above the surface) are leveled by the resistance of dense atmospheric layers, aggravated by the design of the “sea monsters” themselves. They require whole “garlands” of engines to enter the screen mode, which entails obvious troubles : A) Deterioration of aerodynamic appearance compared to a conventional aircraft (smooth cigar-shaped fuselage, only two or four engines). B) Catastrophic fuel consumption in take-off mode. Ten jet engines of the KM ekranoplane burned 30 tons of kerosene at the start! C) Some of the engines were switched off when they entered the on-screen mode and then fumbled as useless “ballast”. To make you understand how essential this is, each of the Lunya engines, together with fuel valves and a nacelle, weighed four tons. And he had eight of these! D) To expand the capabilities of using ekranoplanes in stormy weather and to safely take off and overcome hydrodynamic drag at speeds of hundreds of km / h, the design of their hulls should have increased strength, almost like ship hulls. All this is a direct violation of the theory of aircraft, where there is a struggle for every kilogram of weight. Yes, that’s why the unfortunate “Eaglet” with the same payload as the An-12 had 1,5 times lower speed and half the flight range. He lifted only 20 tons, with a dry mass of his structure 120 tons! For comparison: the An-12 created twenty years before it was lifting the same load with its own weight of only 36 tons. That is why the Lun ekranoplane lacked a combat radius to cross the Caspian Sea. Then someone suggests using similar EPCs to pursue aircraft carriers in the Atlantic. It’s not funny for yourself, which is why the modern Aquaglide ECP has the same carrying capacity (400 kg) as the Cessna-172 created half a century ago. At the same time, “Cessna” for some reason (surprise!) Is content with a motor with half the power (160 versus 326 hp) and, of course, has a higher speed. All the figures given are unlikely to impress the public. Fans of this type of technology will continue to deny the obvious. As usual, all failures will be blamed not on the objective difficulties that arise when flying in dense layers of the atmosphere, but on the lack of modern engines, materials and calculations. But if long-term “calculations” show that it is stupid, it would be strange to continue to solve something. In the future, new lightweight materials and economical engines will appear, but the situation will remain the same. With the introduction of new technologies, airplanes will once again show their complete superiority over ekranoplanes. Aeroplanes only took 10 years to turn into a full-fledged air force. Without the participation of which any military conflict became unthinkable. Despite the wretched design of the first “whatnots”, their advantages were so great that they could not leave anyone aside. A reliable mechanism for screw skewing was hardly created - helicopters went into the series en masse. “Sikorsky R4” has been quite actively used in hostilities since April 1944. In the same 1944, the Germans operated a helicopter carrier “Drache” with a squadron of anti-submarine helicopters Fl.282 “Hummingbird”. Appreciating the car, the Kriegsmarine command immediately issued an order for 1000 such “birds”. The ability to take off from any “patch”, hover in place and move bulk cargo on an external sling - these properties of helicopters are priceless. And what can an ekranoplan offer? The only achievement of the creators of the “monsters” was that they, at the cost of incredible effort, nevertheless were able to lift into the air that, by its nature, should not fly. Ignoring the costs, relying on endless funding from the state. The question, why and why create difficulties out of the blue, remained unanswered. Probably, it was fun for them to drive a 500-ton “shed” around the Caspian Sea using a “garland” of 10 jet engines from Tu-22 supersonic bombers. The inadequacy of the 10-engine “monster” was obvious even at the stage of initial calculations. But he was nevertheless embodied in metal. And, apparently, the experiment was considered successful. The crazy ideas of the “Caspian Monster” were developed in the form of an “Lun” ekranoplane with eight engines from the wide-body airliner Il-86. A comedy with ekranoplanes lasted more than half a century, but it could not last forever. Having obtained the results of the practical operation of these machines, including 140-, 380- and 540-ton “monsters”, customers from the Navy, in the end, covered up a hopeless direction. At times lower speed and carrying capacity with the same take-off weight, triple fuel consumption, the practical impossibility of flying over land - this is what distinguishes an ekranoplan from an ordinary airplane. Is an airplane ideal for landing reconnaissance groups? Of course - after all, the roar of 10 engines will be heard all over the coast. About stealth on radars when flying at low altitude: what prevents the bomber-rocket carrier from doing the same trick? Sneaking up to the target at extremely low altitude at twice the speed than the EPC? Contrary to rumors about the safety of ekranoplanes, “which when the engines fail immediately go into the water”, in reality they fight no less than ordinary planes. Of the eight large “Alekseevsky” monsters, four were defeated, including two catastrophes with human casualties. WIG pilots have no saving seconds left to evaluate the situation and level the car. One awkward movement by the helm - and from the impact on the water at 400 km / h the tail will break off. If you take the helm a little on yourself - separation from the screen, loss of stability, loss of control over the car, disaster, death. Another big problem is handling. Due to the impossibility of making bends with a deep roll, the turning radius of the “Moon” at cruising speed was three kilometers! Now let the most desperate ones try to “walk” the meander of the river on a 380-ton ekranoplane. Or to avoid a tugboat that unexpectedly appeared right at the heading. The only field of application of EPCs today is a water attraction for spoiled tourists who are tired of riding a banana and hydro skiing. The story with an ekranoplan is an interesting social experiment. How easily people believe in all kinds of nonsense. And when trying to point out the obvious fallacy of their judgments, they are ready to violently uphold the absurd point of view, accusing opponents of betraying national interests. And then they are surprised how Kashpirovsky and MMM could appear. Those who call for the revival of work on the creation of heavy ekranoplanes are divided into two categories. The first are impressionable townsfolk who liked the look of a low-flying “super-plane” with a dozen roaring engines. Being confident in their rightness, they do not notice the flaws and on the move invent the imaginary advantages of EPC. The latter represent a group of interests of serious people.
    1. +3
      25 December 2016 19: 49
      Well, yes, the Russian Top website is the last resort in this dispute of water and air ...
      1. +6
        25 December 2016 20: 35
        Quote: sabakina
        Well, yes, the Russian Top website is the last resort in this dispute of water and air ...

        The last resort is much higher, and the article really describes the shortcomings of ekranoplanes and suggests thinking with your own head! hi
      2. 0
        26 December 2016 04: 51
        the article (Kaptsova) is full of arguments - what can you produce in response? Change the laws of physics?
      3. 0
        1 January 2017 07: 17
        Quote: sabakina
        Well, yes, the Russian Top website is the last resort in this dispute of water and air ...

        I am an atheist, but with an "instance" you obviously .... come on, sit down, two Slavka, -burn ..!
    2. +1
      25 December 2016 19: 53
      Well, why did you write all this? In a few days, or maybe tomorrow there will be an article about ekranoplanes, and again they will tell and argue with each other until they understand, compose all kinds of applications and so on and so on. But the facts that you provided will not even be considered, because they do not meet the knowledge and requirements of commentators, therefore they will be transferred to oblivion.
      And so, in your commentary, my opinion is: interesting, reasoned, adequate.
      1. +5
        25 December 2016 20: 30
        Quote: Kostya Andreev
        Well, why did you write all this? In a few days, or maybe tomorrow there will be an article about ekranoplans, and again they will tell and argue with each other until they come to terms

        No, in a few days they will prove that the Americans were not on the moon smile And so to infinity - such a contingent! smile
      2. +2
        25 December 2016 23: 07
        So this is the beauty of ekranoplanes - you can write the same article about them every year - to put order a couple of new lines and hint at great prospects. And rest again. Well, once every six months ....)
        1. 0
          25 December 2016 23: 14
          You are behind the times, now you can write once a week, or even every dune, changing only the author and title of the article. You don’t even have to give a hint, the commentators will arrange a S.A.Ch. themselves and write about prospects and shortcomings. and also the same
        2. +1
          26 December 2016 10: 39
          Enormous prospects for ekrozhelet will appear only when the cars go into the series - for example, the same Orion, A 050 and A 080 and so on.
          1. +1
            28 December 2016 15: 13
            In order for them to go into the series, they need huge prospects. Everything is like the airships, which all go to the prospects, but there is no way to get there.
    3. Hog
      +2
      25 December 2016 20: 26
      A fall from a height of 10 km is very useful for the aircraft, the health of its crew and passengers.
      1. +1
        25 December 2016 20: 32
        Quote: Hog
        A fall from a height of 10 km is very useful for the aircraft, the health of its crew and passengers.

        Yes, it’s more useful - there is enough time to get out of this situation!
        1. Hog
          0
          25 December 2016 20: 40
          Only situations are different, and if you lose control, most planes will not seem to be as small as those on board.
  9. 0
    25 December 2016 19: 55
    Quote: demiurg
    Hundreds of ships built.

    Thousands count
  10. +2
    25 December 2016 21: 14
    This topic "excites" readers and authors of VO!

    Yes, here that throw me - they will discuss everything. Write every day the same thing and every day there will be disputes about anything, just to light up.
  11. Net
    +5
    25 December 2016 21: 38
    A pointless argument.
    Let's compare the ekranoplan with a rocket, they both fly. Or a submarine. They are swimming.
    I'll tell you one story. During the Soviet era, some bum or a Chinese spy in the winter cut off the water heating valve from the heating station in the northern village and all the pipes with the batteries froze and burst. What to do? Kill thousands of people? I had to bring in cast-iron batteries by plane. Economy and efficiency "awesome". Fortunately, the airfield was. Then the buildings were warmed up with machines for defrosting aircraft in arctic conditions and only after that the batteries were changed. And if there was no airfield, as in most northern villages?
    Skeptics, suggest an option. By helicopters? Class, and enough fuel to fly with a load?
    By cars? Winter Week. Who and how will people warm this time?
    Economical? Yes, after one trip, the new Ural is thrown out or undergoing overhaul. This is also "economical".
    In Russia, there is a problem that other countries do not have - huge northern territories with impassability and northern delivery. The only option is in summer on barges. In the spring and in the fall of sludge - you will not send barges. In summer, swamps and impassability. Winter off-road - the organization of caravans and bulldozer escort.
    In small towns, people are completely cut off, mail does not reach. Why do oil workers carry all the equipment in helicopters? And nothing more.
    The ekranolet calmly and over water on rivers and ice in winter and sludge goes at any time and weather. There are no problems landing - water, ice or soil. You can even sit on the sludge (with a special design, such as an air cushion, the skirt is reset). There is no need to build roads, they are rivers.

    Another example? You are welcome. I heard this at one conference. There is Lake Baikal. Rather "lake". In short, to get, let's say, from Irkutsk to Ulan-Ude you go by train for 8-10 hours.
    You go round the whole Baikal. And between these cities 200 km. An hour on the ekranolet. What will people choose? In Soviet times, between them every half hour flew An-24. And then they killed the aircraft. Is security taken into account? An-24 flies at an altitude of 5 km, and an ekranoplan at an altitude of 2 meters.
    There are Barguzin, Kurumkan, Goryachinsk, the Small Sea - resort places with hot healing waters and so on. By ship and minibus get there a day. Ekranoletom 1-2 hours. In Irkutsk and aircraft factories
    there is prevention of crashes (By the way, earlier ekranoplanes were called constructions without an engine - they are pulled by a glider or an airplane, an ekranoplan - with an engine).

    Military? What the hell was the Kuzyu being dragged into the Mediterranean with a squadron? It's so "economical".
    Try a few deck planes? And the airfield is worse? The air defense was dragged, to block the zones inaccessible to the stationary S-300. And control the ovs with their desire to test Tomahawks in Syria and "unknown" aircraft. And if the air defense / missile defense on the screen? Aviation on the screen? Calculate the efficiency and economy in comparison with Kuzya. Enemy fighters themselves will flee from the sky. How to catch an unobtrusive target moving at a speed of several hundred kilometers per hour (ekranoplan)? And between the islands and in the skerries? We will not throw only hats and other AUG?

    If you take away all the anchors from the ekranolet (-planes), three tons each - the Moremans require, according to aircraft technology, make the hull not ship, then when starting from the hydrofoils, two engines are enough in takeoff mode (within two minutes) to tear off the hull of the "wing" from the water and flooded in cruising. You need to carry extra engines.
    All warriors are preparing for the last war, so all their "recommendations" will be negative for a new breakthrough technique. Have you forgotten that all recommendations for MANPADS were also negative, until the enthusiasts bombarded a bunch of Israeli planes? You need to experiment and test.
    1. +3
      26 December 2016 05: 26
      Dear, did you compare the cost-effectiveness of EP with an airplane or a helicopter before writing this nonsense?
      Yes, you didn’t even think why he had such a corps - and at the same time dream of cruising in the Mediterranean and landing in Siberia

      Check out at your leisure https://topwar.ru/91147-ekranoplan-neobhodim-kak-
      pokoyniku-kaloshi.html
    2. 0
      26 December 2016 05: 51
      Quote: Net
      In the days of the USSR, some bum or a Chinese spy in the winter closed the water heating valve from a heating station in the northern village and all pipes with batteries froze and burst.

      Hmm ... A valve to open the mind was not enough, and waited until the batteries and pipes burst? It's easier of course to get batteries ... winked
      1. +1
        27 December 2016 15: 06
        And just did not have time. And when they found it, it was late. At -40, the score goes for minutes.
    3. 0
      1 January 2017 07: 06
      I agree. The argument is pointless. Small ekranoplanes - boats with a plastic, specially shaped hull have long been on sale. Easily moves in shallow water and overcomes small obstacles. Simple, fast, efficient. To fishermen and hunters. For joy. Rivers are expensive for them. There are commercial projects. On an airplane road train, but faster. Here speed and unpretentiousness. The Future Will show.
      http://guarantee-dostavka.ru/?id=747&page=about
      1. 0
        1 January 2017 07: 09
        Small ekranoplan Akvaglayd-5

        Aquaglide-5 is a small type A ekranoplan according to the classification of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Aquaglide-5 is certified by the Russian Maritime Register of Shipping.

        WIG is available!



        1. Brief description and purpose



        Ekranoplanes are fundamentally new high-speed vehicles that combine the positive qualities of ships (vessels) and aircraft. The ekranoplanes have the ability to sail like ships on an agitated surface and move above a surface (water, earth, snow, ice) at a speed close to aviation.
        The five-seater marine walking passenger WIG craft “Aquaglide” is a high-speed vessel - WIG type A in accordance with the classification of the International Maritime Organization (IMO). WIG type A in the cruising mode of movement are constantly in the zone of influence of the screen effect, i.e. at such a height from the supporting surface (water surface), which provides maximum load capacity, speed and stability of movement.
        Aquaglide was designed and built in accordance with the requirements of the WIG Safety Guide adopted by the International Maritime Organization in 2002, and the Rules for the classification and construction of small WIG type A. Aquaglide has a certificate of the Russian Maritime Register of Shipping.
        Aquaglide is designed to transport 5 people, including the driver, at a speed of up to 170 km / h at distances of up to 450 km.

        A comfortable cabin with aviation-type seats, an air conditioning system, an excellent view from the windows of the cabin, the possibility of access to the wing for photographing and filming while standing on the water create maximum comfort for passengers.

        Unsurpassed speed over water in combination with a high degree of safety and reliability provide superiority of ekranoplanes over other passenger ships, including high-speed ones.
        The design of the ship’s hull, resembling a modern high-speed aircraft, its varied color distinguishes Aquaglide from the standing or adjacent ships. Against the background of an ekranoplan moving in cruise mode, all other vessels look like static objects.

        Aquaglide can be successfully used on sea, river and lake routes. High speed significantly reduces travel time and allows for the same time to carry several times more passengers compared to ships of the same class.
        Aquaglide has amphibious qualities, ie the ability to move both on water and in shallow water, and on land, to independently get out of the water and move relatively
        flat coast, start from land to water. Amphibiousness allows to significantly reduce the time, costs and material costs of organizing and executing transport operations, especially on the coast, in places where there are no equipped platforms for boarding and disembarking passengers, berths, and necessary port facilities.
        Ekranoplans to a greater extent, compared with traditional vehicles, meet the requirements of environmental safety, preservation of the environment and biological resources in their places of use.

        The ecological safety of the WIG-Aircraft ekranoplan is achieved due to the features of its design and technical solutions that ensure:
        - lack of wave formation, destroying the coastal strip;
        - the absence of noise transmission under water (there is no propeller) and adverse effects on the aquatic fauna;
        - the absence of harmful effects on the vegetation cover when operating in shallow water, in marshy areas, when entering land.

        The winged hull material (fiberglass) does not adversely affect people and the environment, does not corrode and does not emit harmful substances in contact with seawater.
        As a power unit in the winged aircraft “Aquaglide”, the Mersedes Benz V8 engine is used, which meets the requirements of the Euro-4 standard and higher in terms of efficiency and environmental friendliness
        1. +1
          1 January 2017 07: 14
          Quote: Peacemaker
          WIG is available!

          take ... wrap! Do not forget to load the current of beer into the refrigerator, and the jerky "fish" ... by the way-defky- with me, do not slow them down .... uk ... drinks
  12. 0
    26 December 2016 03: 31
    It would be nice to have a navy base in southern Africa. If somewhere, God forbid, a ship or pirates sank, then a two flies out - one covers up and the other one releases helicopters or boats ...
    1. 0
      26 December 2016 05: 53
      Quote: gorets50
      It would be nice to have a navy base in southern Africa. If somewhere, God forbid, a ship or pirates sank, then a two flies out - one covers up and the other one releases helicopters or boats ...

      Then it’s better from orbit! smile
      1. 0
        30 October 2017 11: 42
        Quote: Bayonet
        Quote: gorets50
        It would be nice to have a navy base in southern Africa. If somewhere, God forbid, a ship or pirates sank, then a two flies out - one covers up and the other one releases helicopters or boats ...

        Then it’s better from orbit! smile
        - yeah, the battery plug cast iron (50) threw overboard (only need a very good ballistic computer feel ) and that's it - there is no pirate, drown from the blow of tremendous force and speed ......
  13. 0
    26 December 2016 08: 26
    Quote: Tlauicol
    Dear, did you compare the cost-effectiveness of EP with an airplane or a helicopter before writing this nonsense?
    Yes, you didn’t even think why he had such a corps - and at the same time dream of cruising in the Mediterranean and landing in Siberia

    Why would he need it. The main thing is to take a force majeure situation and put an equal sign. That's all I read these articles and have never met any arguments in their favor among the supporters of ekranoplanes-monsters. And sometimes there is, for example, the substitution of the concept of an ekranoplan for an ekranolet. Some can "fly", incl. and over land, others are "tied" to the ground effect and cannot maneuver with a sharp roll. And our supporters of this type do not distinguish. Give them the opportunity to drive ekranoplanes over rough terrain.

    For example, I gave an example of such a device as "Buresetnik-24" as a necessary type of transport (if sclerosis does not change me, that is what it is called). Carrying capacity 6 people or 600 kg of cargo. It can operate in several modes: as a displacement craft, as a glider, as a snowmobile, as an ekranoplan, as an airplane. Here is such a vehicle (TC) you really need. And it gives a lot more pluses than minuses. Let it be a slightly larger vehicle, perhaps even a passenger vehicle for several dozen people. But an ekranoplan, not an ekranoplan.
    Supporters of ee take ekranoplanes as an example and make "wunderwaffe" out of them. Sometimes fantastic projects are generally offered, which it is not known in how many decades will be implemented.
    Life itself has dotted I. Well, what about our military, if these machines were as good as the proponents of ekranoplanes describe, they would not count the money and then squadrons and fleets of ekranoplanes would plow the vast seas. But no. They did not need this "miracle". "Miracle", losing in all respects to both ships and aircraft. One plus over ships is speed. Everything else is cons. And when compared with airplanes, there are no obvious advantages at all.
    In addition, supporters forget that the tests took place in principle in the greenhouse conditions of the Caspian Sea ....

    But I am tormented by vague doubts that such articles will appear again and again. Under other names, somewhat modified, but the same
    1. +1
      26 December 2016 09: 01
      Petrel 24 is not an ekranolet. But even if it did, the "economic efficiency" of its aerodynamic appearance in comparison with an aircraft can be seen with the naked eye.
      You only half understood the problem. Learn the second one: even the ekranolet will lose to the airplane / helicopter in flight mode always and in everything!
      with respect !
  14. +1
    26 December 2016 09: 38
    Quote: Tlauicol
    Petrel 24 is not an ekranolet. But even if it did, the "economic efficiency" of its aerodynamic appearance in comparison with an aircraft can be seen with the naked eye.
    You only half understood the problem. Learn the second one: even the ekranolet will lose to the airplane / helicopter in flight mode always and in everything!
    with respect !

    I know it. But if you have to choose from among several evils, you need to choose the lesser. Of course "Buresetnik" loses to the plane. It's just that in certain regions (and it is going to be exploited by EMNIP in Yakutia) this is one of the lesser evils.
    1. +1
      26 December 2016 10: 42
      In Russia, ekranoplanes cannot do without amphibious equipment, including seaplanes.
  15. +2
    26 December 2016 12: 42
    Yes, commentators. Every second, judging by the replicas, is the navel of the earth. But he left literacy and brains somewhere else at school. There are no arguments of their own, they stupidly repeat after the "scribblers". Why compare on the basis of replacement. Compare by complement. A simple example. MBT and KBM with 90-120 mm guns. According to the "couch clever", the military is clearly downsides, since they create such KBM, because there is an MBT. Or maybe the whole point is that each product has its own niche of application, in which this product will feel like a "fish in water". There are such niches for ekranoplanes (ground effect vehicles). As one of the commentators correctly put it, there were problems with materials and filling, most importantly, "children's sores" were identified. And now you can safely start production for those niches where these products are optimal. And based on operating experience, move on. And it is good that experts, and not illiterate "sofa experts" will determine "whether ekranoplanes live or not live".
    1. 0
      1 January 2017 08: 03
      Quote: Arkt
      Yeah, commentators. Every second, judging by the replicas, the navel of the earth

      I definitely don’t ... otherwise, I would live in Sochi, and not in the Urals ....
  16. +2
    26 December 2016 19: 19
    Quote: Arkt
    And it's good that experts will determine "whether ekranoplanes live or not live"

    And they have already identified. All written off. "Lun" has been rusting on the Split in Kaspiysk for a quarter of a century. And experts do not see any inclinations in this direction. And the military does not need it for nothing
    1. 0
      27 December 2016 22: 04
      It is better to develop hydrofoil and air cavern ships.
    2. 0
      1 January 2017 07: 19
      Lun rusts due to its monstrosity and high cost. And his smaller brothers reproduce themselves quite well, are sold and exploited with a bang! And all this Lun ...
      And those who have and produce ekranoplanes are not fools!
  17. +1
    26 December 2016 20: 15
    Quote: man in the street
    As an option, cargo-passenger communication between the mainland and the islands of the Kuril ridge. Including in terms of supplying military bases.

    A little expensive compared to traditional delivery methods.
  18. 0
    27 December 2016 22: 36
    Quote: Vadim237
    It is better to develop hydrofoil and air cavern ships.

    They do it on the air cavity, on the PC - I didn’t hear it. Several were created in the USSR. And on VP too
  19. 0
    1 January 2017 07: 07
    Put ekranoplanes (or hovercraft) on electric traction on high-voltage power lines and on the Russian Railways - it will be a workhorse and wars like "Barguzin" or better ....
  20. 0
    16 January 2017 16: 51
    Since childhood, I am amazed that almost nobody knows about people of this scale. Ever since the beginning of the 80s, a couple of topics slipped about Rostislav Alekseev in the press and that's it. And they write about a person on a scale of the Queen, Sikorsky, Parsons, etc., extremely rarely. Why is that?