Movable machine gun nest / wedge "Object 217"

29
The thirties were a period of active development of tanket shoes. Until a certain time, this class of equipment showed good performance and suited the military. However, the further development of armored combat vehicles led to the gradual abandonment of tankettes. The latest domestic development in this area was a machine called PPG-1 or “217 Object”.

The development of the “Object 217” project started at the very beginning of 1940 of the year on the order of the Red Army command. At this time, the Soviet Union fought with Finland, and the army had to face a number of characteristic problems. In particular, he constantly let himself be aware of the lack of armored vehicles capable of supporting troops in the offensive. The military wanted in the shortest possible time to get a light and cheap sample of armored vehicles capable of supporting infantry with machine-gun fire and protecting their own crew from enemy bullets. The execution of such an order was entrusted to the Special Design Office No. XXUMX of the Leningrad Kirov Plant under the direction of J. Ya. Kotin.



Movable machine gun nest / wedge "Object 217"
The only known shot of the PPG-1 prototype. Photos Otvaga2004.ru


Having received the technical task, employees of SKB-2 set to work. L.E. was appointed the lead designer of the new project. Sychev. The new wedge received the working designation “217 Object”. Later, during the military tests, a promising model of armored vehicles was called PPG-1 - "Movable machine-gun nest, the first model." Both names are equivalent, and can also be used without any confusion with other models of armored vehicles.

The main requirements for the new project stipulated the use of machine-gun weapons, relatively powerful protection and permeability in complex landscapes. In addition, the developers of the “217 Object” decided to increase the survivability of the machine by reducing its dimensions. Among other things, such features of the project should have led to a decrease in mass with improved mobility. The result of the preliminary work was the formation of the original appearance of the promising light class armored vehicles.

In order to maximize the size of the machine, I had to use the original layout of the internal volumes of the case. In addition, the designers were forced to abandon some of the units that improve performance, but complicate and weight the design of the machine. In particular, it was planned to simplify the composition of the transmission and chassis. Also significantly reduced the volume of the fighting compartment.

Within the framework of the “Object 217” project, an original armored hull was created, able to protect the crew from rifle weapons and artillery shell fragments. The front part of such a body was to be made of 20-mm armor plate. The hull sides were 10 mm thick. All other parts were 8 mm thick. To further increase the level of protection, rational angles of armor were used.

The front part of the body was made of a curved sheet. Its upper and lower parts remained straight, but there was a significant bend in the center. Behind the top of the forehead was a small horizontal section of the roof. Behind it was placed a large sheet of the roof, placed at an angle. In the stern of the roof, an additional raised casing was provided. Behind the machine was protected by a curved forage sheet of small thickness. The bottom is made horizontal, the sides are vertical.


Modern layout of the “217 Object”, front side view. Photo Bronetechnikamira.ru


The front part of the body was given a manned volume, performing the functions of a fighting compartment and a control compartment. A small compartment of the stern of the hull had to accommodate the engine and transmission. The internal volume of the case was quite small. Thus, the maximum height of the habitable volume did not exceed 55, see. The aft part of this compartment was even smaller, which could impede the work of the crew.

In the stern of the hull, it was proposed to install a two-stroke two-cylinder motorcycle engine of a horizontally opposed layout PMZ with a power 16 hp The lower part of the engine was placed inside the armored car body, and for the top, protruding above the roof, it was necessary to create a special casing with beveled sides, having several hatches for access inside. The exhaust pipe with a silencer was placed to the right of the casing on the roof of the case. Next to the engine placed three-speed manual gearbox with three speeds forward and one reverse. With the gearbox mating friction clutches that perform the functions of the rotation mechanism. It was proposed to drive the car using a set of levers connected to transmission units.

The “217 Object” got an extremely simple undercarriage. On each board it was proposed to install four large-diameter skating rinks. To facilitate the construction, the rollers had a spit-like structure. Any elastic elements in the suspension were not provided for: the axes of the rollers were rigidly fixed on the sides of the machine. At the same time, the project implied the use of internal depreciation of the rollers. Front support rollers served as guide wheels. In the rear part of the hull there were two driving wheels of small diameter, they were approximately half the size of the rollers. The large diameter of the rollers allowed to do without additional rollers. The upper branch of the caterpillar was supposed to lie directly on them.

On the sides of the hull were installed small wings covering the front and rear of the tracks. Full futuristic shelves were not envisaged by the project.

In accordance with the task of the customer, the new armored vehicle was supposed to carry machine-gun armament. Designers SKB-2 LKZ proposed to equip the "217 Object" with two machine guns such as DT. In large openings of the frontal body part, it was proposed to mount two ball mounts. The design of machine gun installations allowed shelling a section of the front hemisphere several tens of degrees wide. It was also possible to change the stem elevation within a certain vertical sector. It is noteworthy that the angles of targeting machine guns, primarily limited to the small volume and specific ergonomics of the habitable compartment, but not the design of machine-gun installations.


DT machine gun with a regular store and bag-bag. Figure Opoccuu.com


The armament of the "Object 217" was two "7,62-mm tank machine gun of the Degtyarev system mod. 1929 " Machine guns of this type used a rifle cartridge 7,62x54 mm R and were equipped with disk magazines with a capacity of 63 rounds. Automation based on the removal of powder gases gave a rate of fire of 600 rounds per minute. With an initial bullet velocity of about 840 m / s, the machine gun had an effective firing range of up to 800 m. The design of the DT machine gun, based on the infantry DP, had a number of features necessary for mounting on machine gun mounts of armored vehicles.

Ammunition of two machine guns consisted of 1575 cartridges. They were placed in 25 disk stores. Ammunition was proposed to be transported on special mounts of the sides of the fighting compartment. This arrangement of ammunition to some extent made it difficult to replace stores, but allowed to bring the transported ammunition to acceptable values.

The crew of the "Mobile machine-gun nest" was to consist of two people. One of them acted as a mechanic-driver, and in a combat situation both crew members were responsible for the use of weapons. An interesting feature of the project was the change in the position of the crew in preparation for the battle. When moving to the battlefield, the crew had to be placed in a sitting position in the aft part of the habitable compartment, for which a large double hatch in the roof had to be opened. Before the battle began, the driver and the gunner had to lie on the bottom of the hull and close the hatch behind him, after which they could use weapons and not fear return fire.

A large doorway in the sloping part of the roof, closed by two doors of the hatch, was used for landing in the car. Such covers could fold back and forth. In the combat position, the hatch closed, providing protection for the crew against attacks from above. The main means of monitoring the situation in the battle position were two periscopic devices in front of the roof. With their help, it was possible to search for targets for machine guns, and aiming was carried out with the help of standard sights. The heads of the periscope instruments were protected by box-shaped housings, which gave the frontal part of the body a characteristic appearance.

On the case there were two sets of lighting equipment. On the front of the starboard placed a pair of headlights. Another similar product was to be in the stern, on the left side.


Layout PPG-1, the upper hatch is open. Photo Bronetechnikamira.ru


One of the main tasks of the project was to reduce the dimensions of the combat vehicle. Due to the use of the original layout of internal volumes and some other ideas, this problem was successfully solved. The length of the "Object 217" tanket was only 2,5 m, width - 1,72 m, height - 0,86 m. Ground clearance was equal to 300 mm and could not change due to the stiff suspension. The combat weight of the armored vehicle was only 1,73 tons.

The 16-strong motorcycle engine provided a specific power of about 9,5 hp, which did not allow us to expect high mobility, but it was considered sufficient to solve the problems posed. The maximum speed of the car on a good road was to reach 18,5 km / h. The fuel range is up to 100 km. There was the possibility of climbing a slope with a steep 35 ° or 40-cm wall. Width of the moat to be overcome is 1 m. Without preparation, water barriers could be crossed along fords up to 0,5 depth. Sealing the hull yielded 40% buoyancy margin.

However, the wedge had some limitations in terms of mobility. Due to the use of a stiffer suspension, the armored car did not differ much in comfort, which should have led to the crew’s rapid fatigue. For this reason, it was proposed to transport the equipment over long distances by half-ton trucks. With its own move, PPG-1 was only supposed to go into battle and move through the battlefields.

The development of the 217 Object project took only a few weeks. Already in March, 1940, the Leningrad Kirov Plant built the first prototype of an armored vehicle. In accordance with the order of the army, four more prototypes should be built in the near future. Five "mobile machine-gun nests" were supposed to be used in factory, state and military tests. According to the results of all inspections, it was planned to draw conclusions and resolve the issue of adopting new equipment for service.

The first conclusions about the project PPG-1 / "Object 217" were made during the factory tests. Checks showed that SKB-2 engineers managed to create an original military vehicle, but the prospects for this development were in doubt. It was found that the new tankette has a number of characteristic flaws that prevent its full use and limit the potential in a real battlefield.

The available characteristics of mobility and weapons allowed the wedge to accompany the infantry, supporting it with fire. Also, the advantage was the use of relatively thick armor, protecting the crew from various small arms in a large range of ranges. Vitality was further enhanced by a small frontal projection, which seriously hampered the detection and attack of such a machine. A positive feature could be considered the low cost of technology, which in the future would allow for full-scale mass production. However, the positive features of the project actually ended there.


View of the stern. Photo Bronetechnikamira.ru


The military felt that the survivability of the “217 Object” in some situations may not be sufficient. 20-mm frontal armor could not protect the crew from the shells of tank and field guns, and the relatively low mobility made it difficult to escape from the shelling. Another reason for the claims was the deployment of the crew in a combat position, not very different comfort. The need to use a weapon in the supine position, as well as the absence of shock absorbers in the running gear, led to a rapid fatigue of the crew with a reduction in the efficiency of its work.

The last minus of the project, which influenced the final decision of the military, was too late its appearance. A new wedge was developed in connection with the participation of the Red Army in the Soviet-Finnish war. It could be used during this conflict and have a certain impact on the course of the battles. However, by the time the project was completed, the war was over. Because of this, the future development of the future was in question. It was required to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the test results and make a final decision.

With all its advantages, the wedge “Object 217” had a lot of shortcomings that could seriously hinder its operation, as well as limit the potential in terms of combat use. Because of this, new development was considered unpromising. The army command ordered to stop work on an unsuccessful project. At the same time there was a cancellation of the order for the construction of several new prototypes. On adoption and mass production of speech was no longer going.

During the work on the project “Object 217” / PPG-1, a complete set of design documentation was prepared and a single prototype was built. After the test was completed, the need to save the prototype wedge was gone. Exact information about the only prototype built is missing, but apparently, soon after the project was closed, it was disposed of as unnecessary. By the beginning of the forties, the development of armored vehicles led to a drastic reduction in the potential of tankettes and, as a result, to a gradual abandonment of such light combat vehicles. The project "Object 217" was the last national attempt to create tanketki. In the future, Soviet engineers were not engaged in this topic.


Based on:
http://alternathistory.com/
http://bronetechnikamira.ru/
http://otvaga2004.ru/
Solyankin A. G., Pavlov M. V., Pavlov I. V., Zheltov I. G. Domestic armored vehicles. XX century. - M .: Exprint, 2002. - T. 1. 1905 – 1941
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    16 December 2016 06: 37
    The reincarnation of the tachanka ... I don’t think that it could greatly affect the outcome of the first border battles, and in the future. It clearly lacked at least a 45 mm gun, instead of one of the machine guns ... or at least replace one DT with a DShK ...
    1. +1
      16 December 2016 08: 05
      Very very low speed. It’s just nothing. She should fly like Christie and not crawl like a turtle
    2. aba
      +2
      16 December 2016 08: 22
      It clearly lacked at least a 45-mm gun, instead of one of the machine guns ..

      This would immediately lead to an increase in overall dimensions and mass of the wedge. Accordingly, another engine, another chassis, etc.
    3. 0
      16 December 2016 08: 49
      So he invented a bicycle (tank destroyer) wink
    4. +2
      16 December 2016 11: 08
      Thanks for the interesting review!
      Before the start of the battle, the driver and the gunner had to lie on the bottom of the hull.
      Author: Kirill Ryabov

      Perhaps the developers of the PPG-1 were familiar with the project of engineer Maksimov in 1919. I'm talking about the all-terrain armored machine gun "Shieldon".

      The only crew member (mechanic - driver, he is a machine gunner) was located in a reclining machine. This reduced the silhouette of the car and had to increase its vitality.
    5. avt
      +4
      16 December 2016 11: 30
      Quote: svp67
      The reincarnation of a cart ...

      Belching from the remaining admirers of the talent of Marshal Misha and his theories about the clouds of wedges replacing cavalry. Thank God that they did not repeat the mass experiment with thousands of T-2 variants scrapped, but at least the remaining tractors worked.
      Quote: Gray Brother
      A waste of time and resources. To develop such a flawed device, after literally three or four years ago, the Soviet T-26 shamelessly battled his brothers in Spain - this is a crime.

      laughing Congratulations on joining the Stalinist club. bully
      1. avt
        +1
        16 December 2016 12: 00
        Quote: avt
        scrap options T-2

        Underproduced, of course T-27
      2. +1
        16 December 2016 21: 39
        Quote: avt
        Thank God that they did not repeat the mass experiment with thousands of scrap T-2 variants,

        And they looked funny ...

        1. 0
          17 December 2016 09: 29
          Only once I met a description of the combat use of tankettes in military memoir literature. From NG Lyaschenko, General of the Army, in the book "Years in the Greatcoat". And then in a battle with the Basmachi gangs ...
        2. avt
          0
          17 December 2016 11: 25
          Quote: svp67
          And they looked funny ...

          Kurchevsky’s gun still, only when you’ll figure out how much effort and material resources for this fun they lowered, making 3 and almost half THOUSAND pieces ... request The rest of which, later, "historians" added to the total number of tanks. That is no longer amusing, however ... Well, at least they worked as tractors, even a tuft of wool from the money thrown into the wind.
    6. 0
      16 December 2016 13: 40
      Quote: svp67
      It clearly lacked at least a 45 mm gun, instead of one of the machine guns ... or at least replace one DT with a DShK ...

      And it turns out And 13.73-SU (1x45 mm) or And 13.75-SU (2x45 mm). smile
    7. +3
      16 December 2016 15: 28
      Whether you want it or not, you like it, you don't like it, but in the Soviet army, the British Universal Carrier and Bren carrier were in service. Everything else from the region "and without them would have done" But what was, it was
      1. +2
        16 December 2016 15: 38
        [media = http: //]
        1. +1
          16 December 2016 18: 13
          it’s better to go bad than to go well :)
      2. +1
        16 December 2016 16: 49
        Quote: Vz.58
        Do you want, do not want, like, do not like, but in the Soviet Army were in service with the British Universal Carrier and Bren carrier.

        Duc ... Bren-Carrier, we appreciated not for Bren, but for carrier. smile
        Nice small armored personnel carrier - with the possibility of transporting 5-6 people.
        1. 0
          16 December 2016 21: 37
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Nice small armored personnel carrier - with the possibility of transporting 5-6 people.

          Moreover, we did not develop our own production on the basis of the T-27 wedges ..
          1. 0
            19 December 2016 10: 16
            Quote: svp67
            Moreover, we did not develop our own production on the basis of the T-27 wedges ..

            And what was there to develop? The youngest T-27s were launched in 1934 - after which the wedge was discontinued. Moreover, when, after Tymoshenko’s arrival, an inventory of the property of non-profit organizations was carried out, it suddenly turned out that somewhere in a quarter of the issued tankettes mysteriously disappeared:
            ... comparing the presence of military vehicles with the number of industrial plants produced, the following discrepancies were revealed:
            Missing:
            BT-7 96 cars
            BT-2 34 cars
            BT-5 46 cars
            T-26 103 cars
            T-38 193 cars
            T-37 211 cars
            T-27 780 cars
            BA-10 94 cars
            BA-6 54 cars
            FAI 234 cars…
            Raised archival material since 1929 for accounting, special. sending and writing off combat vehicles did not give a significant change in reducing shortages, because decommissioning of military vehicles until 1936 was not conducted.
            The number of decommissioned vehicles, for example T-27 - 26 units - is clearly not true, because the production of these machines began in 1931 and over 10 years this figure should undoubtedly be much larger ...
            © Shein / Ulanov
            At the end of the 30s, the BTR based on the T-26 looked more promising. But due to the load on the tank factories with new tank models and the transfer of the release of parts to the old models to new plants with the conversion of the T-26, they did not have time.
  2. 0
    16 December 2016 08: 21
    In such a specific armored flea, the crew should be difficult - the smaller the growth, the better. For staffing it was necessary to mobilize circuses.
    And yet - it is not clear how the position of the BCP-1 was supposed to change in the battle: it turns out that the crew must again move to the aft compartment, sit open with hatches wide and leaning out waist-high and ride around the battlefield in this form? It turns out that the technique is a one-time use.
  3. 0
    16 December 2016 08: 28
    Thank you.
    The question is somewhat off topic. Since when in the USSR the experimental BTT began to be called "Sample XXX"? What and under what number was "Sample" №1.
  4. +3
    16 December 2016 08: 37
    In the aft part of the hull, it was proposed to install a two-stroke two-cylinder motorcycle engine of the horizontally opposed layout PMZ with a capacity of 16 hp.
    To begin with, the PMZ engine produced only one engine: PMZ-A-750 is the first motorcycle with an ignition switch and an instrument panel.
    The engine of the motorcycle is two-cylinder, four-stroke. With displacement
    746 cubic centimeters. Maximum engine power 14 hp at 3700 rpm At the heart of the engine was Harley-Davidson. Where is the boxer scheme? I do not see.

    Although the PMZ-A-750 is sometimes described as “a Harley-Davidson engine in a BMW chassis,” in fact, when designing its power unit, Mozharov paid tribute not only to H.-D., but also to Indian. The purely Harley scheme with four cams is clearly visible in the section, but, as in the early Indian ones, the PMZ motor gear was gear and the lubrication system was circulating.
    Well, then about the wedge itself. If we take all the developments, then in addition to the shortcomings that the authors draw attention to, the Soviet BTT, at that time, had another big drawback, it was the overload of duties of the machine commander.
    The article is interesting, claims to errors are not to the authors, but to those sources from which they took the data.
    1. +2
      16 December 2016 08: 49
      Quote: Amurets
      Well, then about the wedge itself. If we take all the developments, then in addition to the shortcomings that the authors pay attention to,

      I also forgot to add, if there is no fan, the engine will overheat, and on motorcycles, the engine is cooled by air flow when the motorcycle is moving. By the way, on the M-72 motorcycles there was a boxer engine, and the production of M-72 motorcycles before the war began just at PMZ. But the engine is also 4-stroke.
      << The production of the motorcycle was discontinued in 1939. During the entire production period, 4636 PMZ-A-750 motorcycles were produced.
      After the production of PMZ-A-750 was discontinued, the entire production of motorcycles for the needs of the Red Army switched to the M-72 motorcycle. >>
  5. +1
    16 December 2016 10: 02
    as for me, the idea is very good, I would modify it, put 45ku, strengthen the armor, which at least would hold 37mm non-mchurovskoy. Accordingly, the engine and hodovka. And it would be an analog of a hatzer. A very cheap and effective PT would come out.
  6. +3
    16 December 2016 10: 35
    A waste of time and resources. To develop such a flawed device, after literally three or four years ago, the Soviet T-26 shamelessly battled his brothers in Spain - this is a crime.
    Food for T-26, Italian Wedge Heel CV-35:

    The first tank battle of the Red Army took place precisely between these participants, and the Francoists had flamethrower modifications there.
  7. +1
    16 December 2016 11: 38
    The project is complete nonsense. Even the T-40 tank with a rotating turret, a heavy machine gun and with much greater mobility was useless against the German infantry, which were armed with anti-tank rifles, a 37-mm anti-tank gun and 75-mm infantry guns. And here we see a misunderstanding, somewhat creeping along the battlefield, and devoid of any maneuverability in firing. In my opinion, a rotating tower is a prerequisite for military equipment. No wonder even self-propelled guns now began to be equipped with a tower.
    1. +3
      16 December 2016 14: 59
      So Object 217 is not a tank. And not even self-propelled guns. This is a movable machine gun nest, a self-transporting firing point with bulletproof armor.
  8. 0
    17 December 2016 13: 59
    Quote: svp67
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Nice small armored personnel carrier - with the possibility of transporting 5-6 people.

    Moreover, we did not develop our own production on the basis of the T-27 wedges ..

    Dear colleague, on the other hand, we had a Komsomolets tractor, in my opinion a good idea.
  9. 0
    17 December 2016 23: 30
    The situation in the 30s was of course that. T-37, T-38 amphibious tanks, T-27 tankettes, T-26 two-turret tanks. One has a tower on the left, another has a tower on the right, the third has no tower at all. There was such a leapfrog all over the world. Why attribute everything to Tukhachevsky? Was it better for the British and Poles? Archaic in everything and everyone, incl. and the "gloomy Germanic geniuses" - one T-1a is worth something (by the way, also "food" in Spain for the T-26). That was the time. By the way, the wedge looks good on the outside. The growth of the tanker is probably 1,20 m, or maybe less. belay
  10. 0
    19 December 2016 16: 34
    About. 217 and Ob. 219 in figures, the difference is not big. But really ...
  11. 0
    22 December 2016 14: 58
    I would prefer not wedges but transporters with good frontal armor. Throw smoke at an enemy’s point or trench and at maximum speed to its positions. The landing force dismounts only directly above the trenches of the enemy. Which one? You are sitting in a trench with a rifle and grenades, and then suddenly such a technique comes in from the smoke. And in the trenches, the landing is already operating. The main thing here is that the equipment donate rifle bullets. With machine guns or rifles. look especially no where necessary. I felt with my ass that the trench had been crossed, so it was necessary to stop and land. Until the smoky grains come over them. If only on a straight line the equipment on the guns or crew calculation does not run over. But there will already be landing all the same. The wounded then to these transporters and back. The landing settles down a position. The second wave, either immediately after the first, goes to capture the second line of defense. With the transfer of smoke to it. Either by the same transporters if there are few of them, but with a new landing, or the second unit should be stocked up, or as it should be called more correctly. Now if he suddenly fought, it would be possible to use the old BMP 1 (if they were good, they could be towered into uninhabited and more fast-moving krupnyak with ags). When holding smoke. Naturally, before such a breakthrough, everything is necessary where it is possible to trample and one time just before the offensive. Smoke the likely locations of tanks, guns, reconnaissance, gunners, and correctors. Specialists know where to look for them. It should look so that the position is enveloped in smoke and after it is dispelled, the line of defense is already taken. I think that could be done in Siri as well. But here preparation is needed for close combat is very thorough. Who is how. Counts? Of course, I moved away from the topic. But I never understood wedges. These caterpillar machine guns. Against cavalry, they can do nothing. Among the field. While grenade throw. And yes, I'm a sofa expert.