Own among strangers - 7. English suitcase without handle

24
Own among strangers - 7. English suitcase without handle


Summer 1942 of the year. After the defeat of the PQ-17 convoy, the British command nevertheless decided to attend to if not gaining superiority at sea and in the air of the northern direction, then at least bring it to a certain parity. Indeed, in fact, the Luftwaffe reigned supreme in the sky, and German submarines reaped the harvest among the ships of the northern convoys with impunity. And Tirpitz and his satellites continued to cause muscular relaxation in all the Lords of the Admiralty.



With the exception of the area of ​​responsibility of the North fleet USSR, there it was problematic for the Germans to live and win victories, despite the extreme weakness of the SF and the formations attached to it.

So begins story War on the Eastern Front of our hero.

Hendley Page HP.52 "Hempden" (English Handley Page HP.52 Hampden).



Twin-engine torpedo bomber, the Royal Air Force of Great Britain. Together with “Wellington” and “Wheatley”, “Hempden” took part in the early stage of the war in Europe, participated in the first raid on Berlin and the first “raid of thousands of bombers”, raid on Cologne.

The most “modern” of the British twin-engine bombers, “Hempden”, nicknamed “Flying suitcase” (as well as “Frying pan handle” and “Tadpole”), turned out to be absolutely unsuitable for modern warfare in the air, so the word “modern” turned out to be no wonder in quotes. The losses incurred by the units armed with this masterpiece of aviation were so serious that Hampden was first demoted to night bombers, and at the end of 1942, it was completely removed from the weapons of the Royal Air Force.

The beginning of the creation of Hampden dates back to 1932, when the ministry aviation Britain announced a competition to create a new daytime twin-engine bomber. Handley Page won the competition with its prototype PP.52.

It is even difficult to imagine what happened to competitors if the competition was won by such a weak aircraft.

The first serial "Hampden" flew around 21 June 1938 g. From the prototype, this aircraft differed with a modified nose and a modified wing. Slightly increased the bomb bay, in which it became possible to hang two bombs of 2000 pounds (907 kg). For two more 500-pounders (227-kg) bombs there were holders under the wing.

LTH:
Modification "Hampden" TB.Mk.I

Wingspan, m 21,08
Length, m 16,28
Height, m ​​4,55

Weight, kg
Empty Aircraft - 5400
normal takeoff - 8800
maximum take-off - 10600

Engines: 2 "Bristol Pegasus" XVIII x 1015 l / s

Maximum speed, km / h - 406
Cruising speed, km / h - 350

Practical range, km - 3300
Fighting range with maximum load, km - 1920
Practical ceiling, m - 6920
Crew, pers. - 4
Armament: six 7,69-mm machine guns, bombs up to 1250 kg or one 907-kg torpedo

The composition of the aircraft’s small arms was repeatedly changed, the mechanized armored towers did not fit in the narrow fuselage, I had to confine myself to two hand turrets with twin 303 Vickers K machine guns to protect the rear hemisphere and two more such machine guns in the nose — coursework and navigator’s cabin.

In general, the aircraft turned out ... "Hurrican". Slow, poorly controlled, with weak weapons. The war in the air with Germany made Hampden a desirable goal for German pilots and anti-aircraft gunners.

Of the 1430 aircraft was lost in the battles of 714.

But let us return to the autumn of 1942, when, together with the 210 division, equipped with the Catalina amphibians, and the Spitfire division of the PRIV reconnaissance unit, two Hampden divisions from the 144 and 455 squadrons set off to the Soviet Arctic.

Before the Soviet airfields safely reached 23 "Hampden." 144-th division lost six, and 455-th - three cars. One torpedo bomber, having strayed off the course, landed with empty tanks on the Norwegian coast. The crew was captured. Two aircraft crashed in Sweden, three more intercepted and shot down German fighters. Already on Soviet territory, two Hampdens were badly hit during a forced landing. One sat on the “belly” in the Kirov region, and the other in the forests between Murmansk and Polar. Their crews remained intact.

One Hampden was shot down near Vaenga by the Soviet Hurricane, the pilot of which took an English plane for Me-110. Hampden sat on the water. Saved all but the lower arrow. Due to the lack of information about the arrival of the British at least two more aircraft were mistakenly fired by anti-aircraft gunners. The pilots from the crew of Major Foster could not immediately identify the fighters who escorted their Hampden to the nearest airfield in Monchegorsk, the Soviet Aerocobra and, according to the instructions, ate secret documents. Fortunately, they were printed on thin rice paper.

Fortunately or trouble, but the English pilots did not meet with the Tirpitz. The convoy PQ-18 arrived safely (in comparison with its predecessor) to the ports of the USSR, and as if the British decided that they had coped with the task, it was time to go home.

But no one expressed a clear desire to fly back on these sludges. For losses on the way to the USSR made up 9 aircraft from 32.

Due to a multitude of damages and malfunctions, the aircraft were able to make the first (and only) combat departure from Vaenga only on September 14. The Hampdens, under the command of Lieutenant Colonel McLaughlin, were looking for enemy surface ships in the Altenfjord, on the path of the PQ-18 convoy. But they did not find anyone, because the Germans, as in the case of the PQ-17, preferred to attack convoys with submarines and aircraft.

After the question of the return of the Hampdens arose, the commander of the 455 division, Lieutenant Colonel Lindeman, managed to convince the RAF leadership of the inexpediency of returning the torpedo bombers. Meanwhile, German 29 bombers of September destroyed three in unprotected parking lots and seriously damaged nine Hampdens.

1 October, the Soviet side made an official offer to transfer torpedo bombers. October 6 Prime Minister Churchill approved the decision to provide the remaining aircraft of the USSR. By agreement, the Hampdens crossed the 3 squadron of the 24 th mine-torpedo air regiment (MTAP) of the Northern Fleet, without English sights, cameras and some devices considered secret. He left for England and the stock of torpedoes Mk XII.

Technicians 24-th MTAP quickly restored the on-board equipment of the aircraft and adapted the suspension units under the torpedoes of domestic production. Our torpedoes were longer than the English ones, so our technicians had to increase the bomb bay due to the position of the navigator and to weld the hatch flaps. But such “improvements” of imported equipment have already become normal, so they didn’t cause any problems.



On October 22, after receiving the last "exams," the personnel of the British divisions sailed home, and on 17 surviving torpedo bombers began combat operations of the 3 Squadron (1-I and 2-I fought on SB-2 and DB-3F bombers). North Sea "Hampden" rarely acted in large groups, they often flew to the hunt in pairs.



On December 18, a combat debut took place, when one IL-4 and one Hampden flew out to a “free hunt” for enemy ships found in the Tanafjord area, and in 11 h. 33, m. Were attacked at the fjord entrance two vehicles from the 4- distance 5 cab. and height 30 m. Confirmation of the effectiveness of the attack was not.

By 1 February 1943, only the Hampden 11 remained in the regiment. Due to the lack of spare parts, there were no more than five combat-ready ones. At the same time, the remaining machines were refined - the wing tanks were equipped with a filling system with exhaust gases to reduce fire safety in the luminaire, the chassis were refined and reinforced, the upper turrets with 7,69-mm Vickers were replaced with UTK-1 towers with an UNT 12,7-mm machine gun.

In attempts to find confirmation of the effectiveness of the combat use of the Hampdens, I was able to find only one reliably confirmed case.

On April 25, five “Hampdens” took off with torpedoes to attack enemy ships in the Gamvik area, accompanied by six Pe-3. In 13 h. 00 min. they attacked this convoy, which was marching in two groups in the Kongsfjord area. According to reports from pilots and undercover intelligence, two vehicles and two guard ships or minesweepers were sunk. In air combat, one Non-115, one Me-110 and two of our Pe-3 were shot down, and the anti-aircraft artillery of the enemy ships was hit by the lead torpedo bomber.

In the “Military Chronicle of the Navy” this case is described as follows: “At the time of the attack on the engine of the aircraft of the leading group of captain V.N. Kiselev hit the projectile. But, despite the fact that the entire plane was engulfed in flames, the North Sea residents did not turn off the combat course and, having broken through the fire curtain supplied by enemy ships, dropped a torpedo on the cargo ship “Leese” with a capacity of 2624 brt from the minimum distance. Having flown over the masts of sinking transport, the crew sent its plane to the nearest escort ship, but, not having reached it several tens of meters, the torpedo bomber fell into the water. ”

Three crew members of the deceased aircraft 24 July 1943 was awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union.



In addition to the transport "Leesee" 25 April, the transport "Sturzsee" was sunk with a capacity of 708 brt.

These are the only two losses of the Germans in the north, confirmed on both sides, where Hampden torpedo bombers took part.

At the beginning of July 1943, the material part of the 9-th gmtap was completely updated. The last and long-time defective Hampden was decommissioned on July 10 1943.

So ended the service of the torpedo bomb "Hampden" in the Soviet Air Force of the Northern Fleet. Tellingly, around this time Hampden ended his service in the Royal Air Force of Great Britain.

Did this plane have positive sides?

According to the pilots, yes. Hampden had a very good overview. Plus, good wing mechanization, equipped with slats for almost the entire length, allowed the aircraft to take off using all the 550 meters of the runway.


View from the navigator's cabin

The downsides were a frank low speed (40-50 km / h less than IL-4), almost two times smaller than the IL-4 range, the plane was very strict in control and had poor maneuverability, especially at low altitudes. And so worse that the pilots were not recommended to perform sharp maneuvers in the horizontal. Can not be called good and crew protection.

It has even occurred to anyone that this can be used as a torpedo bomber who must break through the enemy’s air defense, maneuvering and dodging, will remain on the conscience of the British.

Unfortunately, due to the lack of torpedo bombers at that moment, our pilots had to fight on a machine that was frankly weak and unsuitable for this. Probably because the list of dead crews is much larger than the list of victories won.

By the way, it was the episode with the participation of “Hampden” that became the basis for the plot in the movie “Torpedo Bombers”. 14 January 1943 two Hampden discovered a caravan of seven ships. Captain Bashtyrkov's plane was shot down by escort ships when entering the attack. The flaming torpedo bomber did not turn off the combat course, and before falling into the sea, he managed to drop the torpedo through transport. The second Hampden, led by captain Kiselev (later the Hero of the Soviet Union posthumously), despite the damage, returned to his airfield. The crew commander A. A. Bashtyrkov and the gunner-radio operator VN Gavrilov were posthumously awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union.

However, in the film based on the materials of the correspondents of Red Star, Lee-2, made up for IL-4, took part as an airplane. Indeed, the same hero pilot could not fight on a "foreign car" ...

Another page in the stories about what our ancestors had to fight on. Not the most, I must say, joyful. But alas, it is. They fought on what was, but what was not always an excellent technique is a fact.

You can talk for a long time (and reason so far) about everything that came to us (especially from the British) from imported weapons. But the fact that several dozen of our pilots (not the worst, young or unprepared) simply died without causing any damage to the enemy because they fought on frank slow-moving coffins, this is worth remembering.

Whose fault is here, ours, who did not have time to release more good airplanes, or the British, who sent us frank trash, to the dead pilots did not care. The feat was already the fact that they went into battle, hoping to win, but well aware of how small the chances are.

And the burning Hampdens fell into the icy arms of the northern seas.

Ivannikov S. Chronicle of a flying suitcase.
Directory of losses of the naval and merchant fleets of Germany and its allies suffered from the Soviet Navy in the Great Patriotic War 1941-1945.
Shirokorad A. Torpedo.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    8 November 2016 07: 32
    When there were not enough aircraft, they fought on EVERYTHING that could destroy the enemy. Time was like that, and people are Heroes!
    1. +7
      8 November 2016 08: 20
      Real Heroes !!! I fully agree! ps a little smiled episode with eating secret documents - although all according to the Charter ........
  2. +10
    8 November 2016 08: 51
    "Indeed, a hero pilot could not have fought in a" foreign car "..." And the author did not think where our filmmakers in 1983 would have taken Hendley Page HP.52 "Hempden" and even acting, if even under IL 4 had to make up LEE 2?
  3. +7
    8 November 2016 09: 19
    Before writing a novel about the fact that a hero in a movie could not fight in a foreign car, one should recall such a famous film as "Two Captains" with Bogatyrev. So there Grigoriev goes on the attack in Boston. When there was a plane then they filmed a real one, and a real restored IL4 was rolling across the field in torpedo bombers.
    The British sent the weapons on which the English themselves fought, because they had no other. Therefore, they often had to fight on American technology. Therefore, I consider your sighs and indignation about the supply of aircraft not fair. When they were able, then the Allies began to supply new ones. You will not call the Mitchells and Boston obsolete?
    1. +3
      8 November 2016 12: 59
      Something I do not remember that they would send velinkton or Lancaster and Mosquito is not visible in landliz deliveries.
      1. +1
        8 November 2016 16: 44
        Quote: RPG_
        then I don’t remember that they would send velinkton or lancaster and Mosquito is not visible in landliz deliveries.

        Lend-Lease is an American program to help the warring countries, the British did not owe us anything, but nevertheless shared what was.
        Quote: RPG_
        velinkton or lancaster
        strategic bombers were not included in the L-L program either, the British themselves needed Mosquito
        1. 0
          29 November 2016 11: 55
          Here it is quite controversial. It is necessary to read the Lend Lease agreement, but the British at least signed it too and had to supply something in exchange from the union was raw materials.
          1. 0
            29 November 2016 16: 25
            Quote: RPG_
            Here it is quite controversial

            yes, there’s nothing to argue about, the LL program for helping the USA fighting against the Axis, and the return LL is the help of these countries of the USA as a partial payment for materials and raw materials, the countries did not exchange each other under the agreement on LL.
        2. 0
          April 1 2017 17: 03
          Of course, they did not owe anything, they were allowed to shed blood both for them and for themselves.
      2. Alf
        +2
        8 November 2016 19: 46
        Quote: RPG_
        Something I do not remember that they would send velinkton or Lancaster and Mosquito is not visible in landliz deliveries.

        Mosquito was tested in the LII, the result was, in his own words, “The plane is interesting, but for the Air Force of the Red Army it is not of interest because it was created for a completely different tactics of application.
        As a fighter-bomber is not suitable due to the complete lack of reservation, as a scout too tall, as a night fighter, the Germans fought very rarely at night.
        About the Lancaster. On the Lancaster stood the engines of Merlin, which the British themselves lacked. No wonder the British heavy bombers had such a mess with different types of engines. Even the licensed Packard V-1650 Americans delivered to the British.
        I do not say whether the islanders were right or not, but always in all unions the party first provided its needs and only then helped the ally.
    2. 0
      14 November 2016 21: 05
      Quote: Kostya Andreev
      The British sent the weapons on which the English themselves fought

      The devastating criticism of the described twin-engine monoplane in the role of a torpedo bomber would be even more devastating, compare its author with Swordfish. That after all Bismarck knocked out. Something better than Hampden was a single-engine biplane?
  4. 0
    8 November 2016 11: 56
    Quote: aszzz888
    , fought on EVERYTHING,

    The Severomors once had a proverb, “You are my friend or Hampden!” Looks like they “loved” this English miracle very much! hi
  5. +3
    8 November 2016 12: 32
    Whose fault is it here, ours, who did not have time to produce more good planes, or the British, who sent us frank trash, to the dead pilots anyway.

    The British flew on this trash themselves. You yourself write that the "Hampdens" were inherited from the British squadrons.
    As for the domestic industry ... the fact is that the Navy's Air Force received equipment "on a leftover basis." Just look at what the 1942st squadron of 1 mtap fought in the fall of 24:
    On October 22, after taking the last "exams", the personnel of the English divisions sailed to their homeland, and the 17rd squadron began fighting on the 3 surviving torpedo bombers (the 1st and 2nd fought on SB-2 bombers and DB-ZF).

    And it was not only at the Northern Fleet. In the Baltic, the naval IAPs covering Leningrad and the Road of Life until 1943 flew on the I-16. "Golubev-13" even managed to fight the FW-190 on the "donkey".
    1. 0
      8 November 2016 17: 17
      In 1942, 83 I-16s were produced. Moreover, it was a rework of the UTI-4, superior in combat power to all other types of I-16. Type-15B was produced in Baku at the factory # 458 Baku, after evacuation from Rostov. So, in capable hands, it was possible to intercept on the approach to the target on the I-16. Although, I'm sure that Golubev would have preferred a more modern plane, but it's like Tolstoy: "The club of the people's war rose with all its formidable and majestic strength and, without asking anyone's tastes and rules ..."
      1. 0
        8 November 2016 17: 56
        Quote: samoletil18
        In 1942, 83 I-16s were produced.

        The Air Force had a significant reserve of "donkeys" - in the air defense iap:
        In the spring of 1942, most of the I-16 fighters were part of the air defense regiments of the rear areas of the country. In the air defense system of large cities and military facilities, 333 I-16 fighters were used. In addition to the 6th IAK Air Defense, covering Moscow and the 7th IAK Air Defense, defending Leningrad, there was the 8th IAK Air Defense, deployed in the vicinity of Baku. In the arms of the 8th IAK Air Defense units in the spring of 1942 there were 118 I-16 aircraft. In addition, 13 I-16 fighters were part of the 106th Air Defense Fighter Division, which defended Bologoye and 24 aircraft - armed with the Stalingrad Air Defense of the 102nd Air Defense Fighter Division. Eight I-16s were in the 105th IAK Air Defense which closed the Luftwaffe from Rostov-on-Don from air attacks.
        In the summer of 1942, the number of I-16s in air defense units increased to 348, but fell significantly in the fall - many fighters had to be sent to the front to make up for losses. In mid-1943, 143 I-16s remained in the air defense, and by the end of the year - no more than forty. In 1944, all I-16s were retired from the air defense regiments.

        And the regiment of Golubev in 1943 was rearmament on La-5. But several I-16s in the regiment survived - and was used by the most experienced crews in the role of ... night attack aircraft.
        Wanting to save as many U-2s as possible, we were hovering over enemy positions as single "donkeys" at an altitude of 700-800 meters and quite successfully stormed the searchlight installations.
  6. +1
    8 November 2016 12: 47
    It has even occurred to anyone that this can be used as a torpedo bomber who must break through the enemy’s air defense, maneuvering and dodging, will remain on the conscience of the British.

    Well, the English lords had their own cockroaches in their heads, they not only adopted this trash into service. Moreover, they planned to fight on these machines themselves, and not to deliver to the USSR
    1. +1
      8 November 2016 13: 05
      Quote: Amurets
      Well, the English lords had their own cockroaches in their heads, they not only adopted this trash into service.

      I immediately remembered Bolton Paul Difiant ... laughing
  7. +1
    8 November 2016 13: 05
    Whose fault is it here, ours, who did not have time to release more good planes, or the British, who sent us frank trash,

    Here, in this case, the British do not need to blame, they didn’t impose this aircraft on us, they didn’t deliver them by Lend-Lease, they just left unnecessary rubbish at the airport .. But the fact that ours, due to the lack of the right amount of normal planes, decided to use this rubbish, sorry ...
  8. 0
    8 November 2016 14: 41
    5th photo in the article with the inscription on the torpedo "For Kiseleva"Another photo with the same caption.Foreman of the torpedo group of the 24th mine-torpedo aviation regiment A.V. Rakov is preparing a torpedo for installation on a British-made Hampden TB.I aircraft. On the dashboard - the inscription "For Kiseleva!" - in memory of the deceased commander of the 3rd squadron, captain V.N. Kiselev. Hampden TB.I torpedo bomber planes were used by the British to guard the northern convoys and were based at the Vaenga airfield near Murmansk, and then the remaining ones were transferred to the USSR, 3rd squadron of the 24th Northern Fleet mine-torpedo regiment (MTAP), without English sights , cameras and some devices considered secret.
  9. +3
    8 November 2016 14: 45
    Pilot of the 24th mine and torpedo regiment of the Air Force of the Northern Fleet Deputy squadron commander Captain Vasily Nikolayevich Kiselev.

    Vasily Nikolayevich Kiselev (1910-1943) in the ranks of the Navy since 1933. After graduating from a flight school in 1936, he was assigned to serve in the 44th reconnaissance squadron of the Air Force KBF. In 1939 he was transferred to the Northern Fleet in the 45th UAE, later deployed to the 118th OMRAP. He took part in the Soviet-Finnish war. A veteran of the Great Patriotic War since June 1941. As part of the 118th Maritime Regiment, senior lieutenant Kiselev (at that time was a flight commander) made sorties to reconnaissance of the enemy’s naval communications, destruction of enemy submarines and ships, bombing attacks on troops, airfields and military enemy naval bases, search for mines dropped by enemy aircraft. September 4, sank an enemy submarine in the throat of the White Sea. By the end of February 1942, Senior Lieutenant Kiselyov had 201 sorties on his account (79 of them at night). Since November 1942 - as part of the 24th MTAP, unit commander, then - deputy squadron commander. He flew on airplanes DB-F and British Hampden (Handley Page Hampden TB Mk.I). He made sorties to search for enemy convoys and torpedoing ships. By the end of April 1943, on the account of the crew captain Kiselev there were already 4 sunk vessels with a total displacement of 33 tons. On April 000, 25, an air group of 1943 Hampden torpedo bombers, led by Captain Kiselev, flew out to attack an enemy convoy in the Kongs Fjord area (northern Norway). Having discovered the convoy, the torpedo bombers, having built a "wedge", rushed forward. In the midst of an attack from a direct hit by a projectile, V.N. Kiseleva caught fire, but the pilot did not turn off the battle course. The navigator dropped a torpedo from a minimum distance. Struck by a torpedo transport "Leeze" went to the bottom. Flying over the masts of a sinking ship, the torpedo bomber lost control and fell into the sea. The crew of the captain V.N. Kiselev, navigator of the senior lieutenant M.F. Sting, air shooters of foreman I.A. Berdennikov and Sergeant V.I. Zhuchkova died. July 5, 24 to captain V.N. Kiselev posthumously awarded the title Hero of the Soviet Union.
  10. 0
    9 November 2016 07: 52
    And the Tirpitz and its satellites continued to cause muscle relaxation in all the Lords of the Admiralty.


    It is not known who else it caused more "muscle relaxation" at the thought of going to sea - the lords or the officers of the Kriegsmarine headquarters - for fear of losing it.
    As a result, it was only useful to Goebbels and, as a scarecrow, the specter of "tirpicism".
    It would be better if a dozen submarines were assembled - and much more.
  11. 0
    9 November 2016 11: 57
    Eternal memory and glory to the Heroes !!!
  12. 0
    3 May 2017 14: 26
    Whenever I hear questions such as “I should ask why they did not provide the required number of planes”, I want to say directly: well, of course, if you, so smart, had taken the place of the People’s Commissar, if you had given so much technology, the whole country would have screamed in horror, “Enough !!!”. Huh? What is this Kuznetsov? Who is this amateur Vannikov? That would have put the author of the article, so tomorrow would be the end of Hitler and all of Germany.