Little David Mortar: The Largest Gun in the World

19
By 1944, the outcome of the Second World War was no one in doubt. Allies had to win it. The whole question was how long Germany, Japan and their remaining satellites could drag out the conflict. In 1944, the Red Army conducted one of its most successful operations in stories, blows "Bagration" was defeated by the German Army Group "Center". In June of the same year, troops from the United States, Britain and Canada landed on the beaches of Normandy, opening the Second Front in Europe, and the territory controlled by Japanese troops in the Pacific Ocean was rapidly declining.

The US military increasingly thought about a possible invasion of the territory of Japan itself. It was assumed that in their own land, the Japanese Imperial Army would put up very fierce resistance on the previously prepared defense lines. As a means of destroying the long-term fortifications of the Japanese, a mortar of a very large caliber - 914 mm (or 36 inches) was proposed. According to this indicator, the American project, which received the playful name Little David (Little David), surpassed the German artillery systems of super-large caliber known today all over the world, like "Karl" (600 mm) and "Douro" (807 mm).



The unique American mortar, which still holds the record for the largest caliber among all modern artillery, was created on the basis of an experimental system designed to test aviation large bombs. The mortar was distinguished by the fact that, with a caliber larger than that of the German giants of the Second World War, it was more compact than them, however, its firing range was quite modest. Structurally, an unusual artillery mount was a barrel slightly more than 7 meters long and weighing more than 36 tons and a stationary base in the form of a box, which had to be buried in the ground, weighing about 46 tons. The transportation of the two main parts of the mortar was carried out by two tank transporters.

Little David Mortar: The Largest Gun in the World

During the Second World War, the American army often used decommissioned barrels of large-caliber naval guns to test aerial bombs. The tests were carried out using relatively small powder charges, which were sufficient to send a bomb to a distance of several hundred yards. Such systems were used by Americans because with the usual dropping of bombs from an airplane, much depended on the change in weather and the ability of the bomber crew to accurately fulfill all the test conditions. With the increase in the caliber of bombs 9- and 12-inch gun barrels are no longer suitable for these purposes. Therefore, in the US, it was decided to create a device that received the designation Bomb Testing Device T1.

This device is very well proven, and the experience formed the basis of the idea of ​​using it as an artillery gun. It was planned to use it against enemy fortified objects, mainly well-defended fortifications. The Americans were very afraid to meet the deep-echeloned defense of the Japanese islands with a large number of fortifications and bunkers. The project was launched in March 1944, in the same year, but already in October, test shooting began. The US military expected to have a more powerful weapon at their disposal than the 16-inch guns that were on the Iowa type battleships. During the battle for Iwo Jima in February-March 1945, the 1200-kg shells of these guns showed their lack of effectiveness against Japanese bunkers located on the island.


Externally, the Little David Mortar 914-mm Mortar was created in the USA. It was a barrel-gunned mortar with a rifled barrel that rested on a large steel box (5500x3360x3000 mm) weighing over 46 tons, dug into a deep hole. In the steel box, which was the base of the mortar, there was a vertical guidance mechanism, as well as six hydraulic jacks designed to install and remove the barrel, which weighed more than 36 tons. The barrel of the mortar was lowered and raised with the help of a “quadrant” driven from the breech, the width of the box allowed for horizontal guidance of the mortar. The thumb of the mortar was missing, the hydraulic recoil brake was concentric. A pump was used to return the barrel to its original position after the shot.

Especially for this mortar was created a unique projectile T1-HE with a long cone-shaped nose and cuts, which should coincide with the rifling of the barrel for reliable obturation. The mass of the projectile was 1678 kg (3700 pounds), of which 726 kg (1600 pounds) was the mass of the explosive. Mortar could send such a projectile to a distance of 8687 meters (9500 yards). Charging was carried out with a muzzle cut, split cap. At zero elevation angle, the T1-HE projectile was fed into the barrel with a crane, after which it advanced some distance, then the mortar barrel was raised, and further loading was carried out under the action of gravity. In the nest, which was located in the breech, was inserted primer-igniter. The mass of the total charge was 160 kg, and the 18 and 62 kg bags were used. It was believed that the destructive impact of such a projectile would be enough to destroy any goals. The funnel, which remained at the point of rupture, reached 12 meters in diameter and 4 meters in depth.


Mortar was created in a single copy and never left the location of the Aberdeen Proving Ground, and therefore did not participate in the hostilities. Tests of artillery installation was delayed, the Second World War ended, and the invasion of the Japanese islands was not required. Therefore, the work on the mortar was frozen at the stage of finishing tests. At the same time, the main disadvantages of the 914-mm artillery system, which included a small firing range (less than 9 kilometers) and insufficient accuracy, could not be eliminated. The project was completely closed in 1946 year.

Not inspired by the US military and 12 hours, which were required for the deployment of mortars and equipment positions. In fairness, it is worth noting that the German superheavy 800-mm Dora gun was transported by 25 special railway platforms, and the process of bringing the gun into combat readiness with the arrangement of the position for shooting took weeks. Near Sevastopol, it took the Germans 4 weeks to arrange the position, with more than three thousand people participating in the work, including prisoners of war. In this regard, the Little David American mortar was much more mobile, and it was much easier to deploy it. For its transportation, two powerful tank transporters M25 Tank Transporter (G160) with the wheel formula 6х6 were used. One transporter transported the receiver, the second - the box-base. Thus, the mortar was much more mobile railway guns. In addition to the 914-mm mortar itself, the unit included a bulldozer, a crane and a bucket excavator, which were supposed to be involved in the artillery position equipment.


After the closure of the project, the Little David became a museum exhibit and today is represented in the extensive exhibition of the Aberdeen Artillery and Technical Museum. Here everyone can see the barrel and the box-base mortars, which rest on the wheels of the conveyors, as well as one of the unique shells. Of interest are also the video frames of tests of this artillery "monster" that have survived to the present day.



Little David mortar performance characteristics:
Caliber - 914 mm.
The total weight is more than 82 tons (together with the base).
Length - 8534 mm (receiver part).
Barrel length - 7120 mm (L / 7,8).
Elevation angle - from + 45 ° to + 65 °
The horizontal guidance angle is 26 °.
Projectile weight - 1678 kg.
The mass of explosives in the projectile - 736 kg.
The initial velocity of the projectile - 381 m / s.
The maximum firing range - 8687 m.
Deployment time - 12 hours.





Information sources:
http://www.popmech.ru/weapon/234030-samoe-krupnokalibernoe-orudie-v-mire/#full
http://warspot.ru/5574-samoe-tolstoe-orudie-v-mire
http://www.shooter.com.ua/specialnye-zadachi/327-914-mm-mortira-malenkij-david.html
Open source materials
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    4 November 2016 06: 54
    "Dora" at least fired at a fairly decent distance to exclude formally counter-battery firing (if not to take into account aviation). And so it is quite compact for its caliber and mobile "babakha". For destruction during siege and assault of various fortified areas, it would be quite suitable Yes hi
    1. +4
      4 November 2016 07: 34
      In the USSR there was a 280mm mortar. Made 45 pieces. Enough for the eyes. Including Koenigsberg.
      Easier to drag the ISU-152 for direct fire.
      1. AUL
        +3
        4 November 2016 08: 13
        Another miscarriage of mania of gigantism!
        1. +8
          4 November 2016 09: 46
          But it is very convenient to use in construction for extracting pits. Only 12 hours to install, and then in a radius of 9 km you can dig as much as you want, and most importantly - quickly!
      2. +9
        4 November 2016 09: 42
        You probably mean the Br-5 on the tracks, there was another 305 mm howitzer 15 years old (Obukhov plant) - on the Karelian Isthmus and Konigsberg it worked well.
        Shell 337 kg. But it was very mobile - 64 tons on a stationary machine.

        So, in fact, Br-5 and B-4 (the Karelian sculptor) in Karelia and Königsberg did the main “work” of the artillery of the RVGK.
        The Red Army turned out to be well armed to fight against bunkers and "unique structures" in Konigsberg. There was no need to develop anything new in a "fire fighting" order. The Germans, with their Dora, are like a pig - there is a lot of screeching, but almost no wool.
        1. 0
          10 November 2016 00: 38
          as it gets warmer immediately torn to Kronverk one more time))))
  2. +1
    4 November 2016 08: 59
    mdaaa, 12 hours to prepare
    1. +1
      4 November 2016 14: 30
      In general, "large-caliber" siege ballistae also made no more than three "shots" per day.
  3. +5
    4 November 2016 09: 14
    Tactical missiles CANCELED siege artillery of these calibers. "Iskander" will be more accurate, and not an example further. Well, in those days - there was no alternative. True, common sense ends somewhere - the complexity of using such monsters clearly outweighs the benefits of using them.
    1. 0
      4 November 2016 09: 58
      And Iskander will be able to break through what this babah can break through, it's me about the bunker. It is a pity that there is no data on prgribivaemost
      1. +4
        4 November 2016 11: 35
        missiles completely guns never replace
  4. +2
    4 November 2016 12: 27
    So what?
    Projectile weight - 1678 kg.
    Weight BB - 726 kg.
    The maximum possible funnel is 12 x 4 meters.
    -------------------
    Then they rubbed us on the ears in Donetsk .. a funnel with a depth of 12 meters, and a diameter (with uneven edges) - 33 meters.
    Like, this is Point U left. And at the Point At warhead weighs only 420 kg. That is - almost four times less. And the weight of explosives is 4,5 times less.
    -----------------------
    In short.
    Unclear. Why do we hang noodles on our ears in a coordinated and friendly manner, both from the Armed Forces of Ukraine and from the DPR.
    1. 0
      30 December 2016 13: 34
      Quote: ammunition
      So! and on the ears in Donetsk .. a funnel with a depth of 12 meters, and a diameter (with uneven edges) - 33 meters.
      Like, this is Point U left. And at the Point At warhead weighs only 420 kg. That is - almost four times less. And the weight of explosives is 4,5 times less.
      ----------------
      In short. Unclear. Why do we hang noodles on our ears in a coordinated and friendly manner, both from the Armed Forces of Ukraine and from the DPR.

      a simple difference in the effectiveness of weapons with a run in generations of half a century,
      Why is it incomprehensible to you?
  5. kig
    0
    4 November 2016 13: 17
    A mortar of the same caliber was created in 185 some year.
  6. 0
    4 November 2016 19: 58
    Yes, Americans, the most peaceful nation.
  7. 0
    4 November 2016 23: 20
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Tactical missiles CANCELED siege artillery of these calibers. "Iskander" will be more accurate, and not an example further. Well, in those days - there was no alternative. True, common sense ends somewhere - the complexity of using such monsters clearly outweighs the benefits of using them.


    What missiles, this gun was made in 1945, then only missiles were fau 2. read the article carefully, the gun was made to break through the defense lines in Japan, which had no missiles.
    1. 0
      5 November 2016 22: 10
      "Well, in those days there was no alternative." What is the subject of the dispute?
  8. 0
    8 November 2016 09: 27
    I want this myself
  9. 0
    10 November 2016 00: 37
    some of the developers have trouble with their own sizes, probably lol (joke)